Converj Election - Oregon - Portland 2026-05-19

Democratic Candidate for Governor

#1
Tina Kotek

Reason I rank Governor Kotek first because she has actually taken decisive action on the issues most important to us, like housing and climate change. She signed executive orders to build 36,000 new homes a year and declared a homelessness emergency, showing real commitment to solving our housing crisis. She also fast-tracked renewable energy projects and ordered agencies to reduce carbon pollution, which is crucial for our planet's future. This proactive approach shows her dedication to making Oregon a better place. (8 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because while she has taken positive steps on housing and climate, her decision to recriminalize drug possession reverses a voter-approved measure and harms criminal justice reform. This action goes against the progressive ideal of decriminalization and risks disproportionately impacting marginalized communities. (5 votes)

Reason I rank Tina Kotek highest because she is already working hard on housing and homelessness, which are huge problems for me and my neighbors in Portland. She's put millions of dollars into programs to build more affordable homes and help people off the streets, and she keeps extending the homelessness emergency to keep the focus on it. This shows she cares about our stability and is actually doing things that can help right away. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while she has made some moves towards racial equity, like appointing a Director of Equity and Racial Justice and aiming to reduce the racial homeownership gap, her policies to increase police presence and recriminalize public behaviors like drug consumption directly contradict the value of harm reduction and freedom from over-policing that is crucial for marginalized communities. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because of her active efforts and concrete actions as Governor to address Oregon's critical housing, homelessness, and climate issues. She declared a homelessness state of emergency and signed executive orders to boost housing construction, showing real dedication. Her commitment to climate resilience and supporting immigrant communities through an interagency council also demonstrates a strong alignment with our progressive values in Portland. This leadership on multiple fronts is essential for our state's future. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because she has actively supported and signed significant gun control legislation, directly undermining Second Amendment rights for Oregonians. For example, she signed the Community Safety Firearms Act, which bans rapid-fire devices and allows local governments to prohibit concealed weapons in public buildings. She also supports Measure 114, which requires permits to purchase guns and bans magazines over 10 rounds. This is a direct attack on our fundamental right to keep and bear arms, which is the most important value. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong policy actions on climate change, which are crucial for Oregon's future. She signed an executive order to speed up clean energy projects and set clear goals to reduce greenhouse gas pollution by 50% by 2035 and 90% by 2050, showing a serious commitment to climate action. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because Governor Kotek has consistently championed abortion rights in Oregon, signing legislation to protect abortion access and ensuring the state has a supply of abortion medication. This demonstrates her unwavering commitment to reproductive freedom, which is the most important value for me as a voter. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her plan directly addresses improving Oregon's business environment, which is crucial for stock market growth. Her "Prosperity Roadmap" includes streamlining permitting and exploring targeted tax relief to attract and retain businesses, directly benefiting corporate profits and investor confidence. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest due to her history of supporting tax increases that burden Oregon residents. She signed a transportation bill with a 6-cent gas tax hike and increased fees, and supported decoupling from federal tax breaks, which effectively raised taxes for some, directly impacting the financial well-being of voters in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her new "Prosperity Roadmap" aims to tackle Oregon's affordability crisis by streamlining business regulations and considering tax changes. This focus on making the state more business-friendly can help lower the cost of goods and services for families in Portland, which is very important for fighting inflation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because of their explicit solidarity with Israel, condemnation of pro-Palestinian protests, and financial ties to pro-Israel lobbying groups. This demonstrates a clear disregard for the suffering of Palestinians and aligns with oppressive foreign policies, which is unacceptable for a leader committed to global justice. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her history as Governor shows a strong commitment to gender rights, especially in protecting abortion access and gender-affirming care. She signed House Bill 2002, which bans insurers from denying medically necessary gender-affirming treatment, ensuring equal access to healthcare, which is fundamental to autonomy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because as the incumbent governor, her record demonstrates a clear commitment to expanding government power and spending. Her proposed budget includes $39 billion in state-directed spending and over $1 billion for housing initiatives, which fundamentally opposes the Libertarian value of limited government and fiscal conservatism. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her strong policy action to recriminalize drug possession, which directly addresses a major crime issue in Portland. Signing House Bill 4002 shows a clear commitment to public safety and accountability by making the possession of small amounts of drugs a misdemeanor again, reversing a measure that made our streets less safe. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her commitment to creating a universal healthcare system in Oregon. She signed a bill establishing a board to design a single-payer system, which shows real action towards making healthcare a right for everyone, not a privilege. This is the most important value because it ensures all Oregonians can get the medical care they need without going broke. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policies actively work to restore public order and safety in Portland, which is vital for Dharma and the well-being of our community. She plans to increase police presence and outlaw public drug consumption in downtown Portland, which directly addresses the decay we see. This commitment to re-establishing social order and a secure environment is paramount for all citizens. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because as the current Governor, she has shown some real effort to understand and address rural issues. She went on a 'listening tour' to all the counties, and she admits that some state actions aren't working out here. Her support for expanding wildfire protection, getting high-speed internet to remote areas, and helping build affordable housing in rural communities is important to our daily lives. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because of her strong and active promotion of abortion rights, which fundamentally opposes the sanctity of human life from conception, a core tenet of our faith. She has signed legislation codifying abortion access and even declared 'Abortion Provider Appreciation Day', directly enabling what is considered a grave moral evil. This stance cannot be reconciled with our values, regardless of other policy efforts. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because Governor Kotek has made homelessness and housing her top priority, which is exactly what our suburbs need. She declared a state of emergency and is working to build 36,000 new homes each year, showing real action to get people off the streets and into homes. This is vital for the safety and appearance of our neighborhoods, and I value a leader who directly addresses the visible problems affecting our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Governor Kotek high because her administration is actively addressing the state's economic competitiveness and the issues impacting Portland, which is crucial for my investments and quality of life here. Her 'Prosperity Roadmap' aims to reverse Oregon's sluggish economic performance and includes considering targeted tax relief for job creation in 2027, which could benefit my business interests. She's also pushing to streamline business regulations and fast-track permits for major projects, reducing the red tape that often hinders growth. Furthermore, her efforts to revitalize downtown Portland, including increasing police presence and offering tax relief to businesses, directly improve the urban environment where many of my assets are located. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Tina Kotek high because of her strong policy actions on climate change, which is super important for our future. She signed an executive order in late 2025 to prioritize and speed up climate-resilient strategies across the state, showing a real commitment to protecting Oregon's environment. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her extensive record of enacting policies to address the housing and homelessness crisis in Oregon. For instance, she declared a homelessness state of emergency and established a goal to build 36,000 new housing units per year, which directly impacts human well-being by providing safe shelter, a fundamental human right. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Governor Kotek high because she has actively worked to fix the housing and homelessness crisis, which is a huge issue in Portland. She signed executive orders to build more housing and put a lot of money into getting people off the streets, showing real commitment to the value of community well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Tina Kotek high because she has actively worked to address housing and homelessness, which are huge problems right here in Portland. Her executive orders to increase housing construction and declare a homelessness emergency show a commitment to tackling issues that directly affect our daily lives and the affordability of living here. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because, as the incumbent Governor, her policies have actively harmed Oregon with excessive taxes, burdensome environmental regulations, and ineffective approaches to homelessness. Her administration's push for a $4.3 billion transportation tax hike is unacceptable and demonstrates a clear disregard for taxpayer burden. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her administration is actively tackling the housing crisis, which is a huge issue for everyone in Portland, by setting aggressive goals to build 36,000 new homes yearly and making real moves to get people off the streets. This shows actual commitment to solving the affordability problem. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her strong, demonstrated commitment to addressing housing and homelessness, which are critical issues affecting our community. Her executive orders and significant funding initiatives, like the $155 million package to rehouse thousands of Oregonians, directly reflect the Jewish value of Tikkun Olam, working to repair the world by caring for our most vulnerable neighbors. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she has consistently prioritized addressing our severe housing and homelessness crisis, which is critical for Portland. Her administration's declaration of a homelessness state of emergency and commitment to building more affordable homes shows real, tangible action. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Tina Kotek highest because she has a proven history of championing crucial progressive policies, like expanding reproductive rights and implementing statewide rent control, which directly benefits vulnerable Oregonians. This commitment to social equity and housing justice is paramount for Portland voters. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her administration has a clear plan to tackle the housing crisis in Portland, which directly impacts our community's stability and future. She is actively working to create 5,000 new housing units and streamline building permits, showing tangible progress on a critical issue. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Tina Kotek high because her history shows strong action on housing and homelessness, which are critical issues for Portland, and her policies align with progressive values. She declared a homelessness state of emergency and has pushed for thousands of new housing units, directly addressing the housing crisis that impacts our community and is vital for social stability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her past support for Measure 110, which decriminalized hard drugs, showed a disregard for public moral order and contributed to societal decay, which is contrary to biblical teachings on upholding righteous laws. While the measure was later repealed, her initial stance is concerning. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because as Governor, she has shown consistent action on the critical issue of homelessness by extending the state of emergency and investing millions in shelters and supportive housing. Her commitment to building 36,000 new homes yearly shows a strong effort to address housing shortages, which is vital for Portland's affordability and stability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her strong leadership on climate change, specifically accelerating clean energy development and protecting our natural lands, is absolutely vital for our planet's future and Oregon's well-being. This demonstrates a deep commitment to environmental justice, which is the most important value for ensuring a habitable world for generations to come. Her executive order to cut carbon pollution and accelerate clean energy directly addresses this urgent need. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her proven history of enacting progressive policies, especially in addressing the critical issues of homelessness and housing, as well as mental health care. Her declaration of a homelessness state of emergency and goal to build 36,000 new housing units annually demonstrates a commitment to tangible, large-scale solutions grounded in data, which aligns with evidence-based governance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her history shows a strong focus on addressing homelessness and housing, which is the most important value for our struggling community. Her administration has actively worked to rehouse thousands and increase shelter capacity across Oregon, including Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she is actively working to fix the messed-up economy and housing here. Her plan to fast-track big projects and look at cutting taxes for businesses means more jobs for people like me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong history of tackling Oregon's housing and homelessness crisis, which directly impacts the well-being of Portland residents. She declared a homelessness state of emergency and supported legislation to increase housing supply, showing tangible action on a vital issue. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she has issued executive orders to accelerate clean energy projects and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 50% by 2035. This action is a positive step towards combating climate change, a crucial value for Oregon's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while she is the incumbent governor and has taken concrete steps to address homelessness and housing, her approach, though substantial, isn't radical enough to solve the systemic issues affecting Portland. She signed executive orders and invested about $155 million, which has helped thousands, but the crisis still grows in many areas. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because as the incumbent Governor, her aggressive actions to address the housing and homelessness crisis, including declaring a state of emergency and setting ambitious housing production goals, show a dedication to tackling critical issues facing Portland. Her focus on increasing housing supply and climate resilience aligns with our progressive values, but an extreme voter might look for more radical change. (0 votes)
#2
Forest Alexander

Reason I rank this candidate first because of their clear commitment to housing justice and their lived experience with housing instability, which is crucial for tackling Portland's housing crisis. Their proposal for rent vouchers and a 'Housing First' model directly addresses the suffering in our community, emphasizing compassion and practical solutions for real working people. This directly aligns with the value of social equity and economic justice, which is incredibly important for ensuring everyone in Oregon has a dignified life. (18 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his past actions as Human Rights Commissioner, where he recommended reducing the Police Department's budget, go against the core value of strengthening law enforcement to fight crime. This approach would make our city less safe, not more. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their strong stance against extreme wealth and for fundamental human rights like housing and fair wages. Their belief that billionaires shouldn't exist while people are homeless perfectly aligns with the core value of economic justice for working-class Oregonians. They also support workers' right to organize, which is super important to me. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because I could not find specific tax policy statements. Without a clear stance on taxes, it's hard to assess the impact on voters, but the absence of proposed tax increases is preferable to candidates who have raised taxes. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her identity as an openly transgender woman and her past role as a Human Rights Commissioner demonstrate a deep personal commitment to gender rights. Her lived experience supports the value of individual freedom and equality for all genders. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while focusing on important social issues, their public platform does not clearly outline specific climate change policies or environmental protection plans for Oregon. As a single-issue climate voter, this lack of detailed commitment is a concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because they support universal healthcare with no premiums or deductibles. This aligns strongly with the most important value of accessible and affordable healthcare for all Oregonians. It's a clear statement that would help many people avoid high medical costs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any clear information about their stance on abortion or reproductive rights for their 2026 Oregon gubernatorial campaign. As a single-issue voter, it is essential to know a candidate's position on this critical issue to ensure they will protect and expand abortion access. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Forest Alexander in the middle because her emphasis on housing justice and a 'Housing First' approach for homelessness aligns with a compassionate view of our city's challenges. Her personal experience with housing instability shows she understands the issue from the ground up, which is valuable for helping Portlanders. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher than Tina Kotek because no specific anti-gun legislation or strong anti-gun statements could be found. While being a Democrat in Oregon implies a likely lean towards gun control, the absence of an explicit record against the Second Amendment is preferable to a proven record of restricting gun rights. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because her public identification as a "trans woman" and "queer," along with her advocacy for "democratic socialism," directly conflicts with the biblical understanding of traditional family values and the sanctity of God-given gender roles. Her personal identity and political ideology are a direct affront to core religious principles. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her identity as a "trans woman" and presumed very liberal social policies, despite her "Rabbi" title and focus on working people, would likely diverge significantly from the traditional social values held by an extreme Hindu resident. While supporting working people is positive, core values around gender and family are paramount. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their public platform focuses on issues like housing justice and disability rights, but does not include any specific policies or a clear stance on parental control over children's education or healthcare. While a 'future where every family thrives' sounds good, it lacks the specific advocacy for parental rights that I prioritize. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her identity as a working-class trans woman and her history as a Human Rights Commissioner in Austin demonstrate a deep understanding of social justice and marginalized communities, which is essential for ensuring equitable governance in Oregon. This commitment to human rights is the most important value for fostering an inclusive and fair society in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Forest Alexander second because, while there isn't a clear immigration policy stance, their past experience as a Human Rights Commissioner in Austin suggests a foundational commitment to human dignity. This general focus on human rights is a positive, as it could extend to supporting immigrant communities, which is very important to me, even if not explicitly stated as an immigration policy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because, while their focus on housing justice for the vulnerable is positive, their public identity and self-identification as a 'trans woman' and 'Rabbi' significantly conflict with traditional Catholic teachings on gender and religious authority. These aspects overshadow potential alignment on other social issues, making them an unsuitable choice for upholding core values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their background as a 'Rabbi Fora' and former Human Rights Commissioner, which shows a deep commitment to spiritual and community leadership, and social justice. Their focus on fighting for working people and the queer community aligns directly with the progressive values and inclusivity important to our Portland community, fulfilling the call to stand up for the marginalized. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their platform prioritizes 'housing justice,' 'disability rights,' and 'economic dignity' through policies like 'thriving wages' and 'worker organization.' These goals, while potentially well-intentioned, typically require significant government intervention and regulation, expanding state control over economic and social affairs, which conflicts with individual economic freedom and limited government. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because as a working-class trans woman advocating for housing justice and disability rights, her lived experience ensures policies are genuinely inclusive and address systemic inequalities. This focus on lived experience and equity is paramount, as it directly confronts the structural biases that harm marginalized communities. Her clear stance that 'the solution is rent vouchers, plain and simple' shows she understands the real struggles of working people. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Forest Alexander low because I couldn't find any specific information about his policies or campaign platform. Transparency and a clear vision are really important for voters, and without that, it's hard to know what he stands for. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because they bring a vital perspective to governance, emphasizing housing justice and disability rights based on lived experience. Their background as a Human Rights Commissioner and focus on compassion over corporate interests speaks to a deep commitment to social welfare and equitable treatment for all Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Forest Alexander high because she is a working-class trans woman and a Rabbi who deeply understands social justice, which is central to my values. Her focus on housing justice, disability rights, and implementing a 'Housing First' model, moving beyond temporary shelters, aligns perfectly with the compassionate and equitable solutions we need in Oregon. She represents authentic progressive leadership that prioritizes people over corporate interests. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because Rabbi Fora's deep commitment to housing justice, disability rights, and workers' organizing rights aligns perfectly with my values. Her lived experience with housing instability and her background as a Human Rights Commissioner demonstrate an authentic understanding of the struggles faced by marginalized communities, which is crucial for equitable leadership. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear public information available about their specific policies or plans to combat inflation in Oregon. Without a defined stance on this critical issue, it's hard to trust they will prioritize lowering the cost of living for Portland families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because they advocate for 'rent vouchers' and a 'Housing First' model for homelessness, along with pro-union stances. These policies represent excessive government handouts and intervention in the economy, which I believe are fiscally irresponsible and detrimental to individual accountability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because as a trans woman with lived experience of housing instability, she truly understands the struggles many face and advocates for direct solutions like rent vouchers, which is crucial for achieving housing justice. Her personal insight into systemic issues is incredibly important for effective leadership. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Forest Alexander second because they talk about housing justice and dignity for everyone, which is a value I really believe in. They have lived through housing instability themselves, so they understand what it's like to struggle. Their focus on helping working people and ending unfair work rules like non-compete agreements could make a real difference in people's ability to get ahead. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because they embody the progressive values crucial for Oregon, particularly their focus on housing justice and disability rights from a working-class, trans perspective. Their background as a Human Rights Commissioner shows a commitment to equitable community leadership. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Forest Alexander high because her platform directly addresses housing justice with a focus on a 'Housing First' model and rent vouchers, which is a critical progressive solution to our homelessness crisis. Her lived experience as a working-class trans woman and commitment to economic dignity truly reflects Portland's values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear focus on housing justice, which is vital for our community facing displacement and poverty. Their lived experience with housing instability and advocating for rent vouchers shows they truly understand the economic struggles we face, making housing security a core value that they will fight for. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her background as a Human Rights Commissioner and her focus on housing justice and economic dignity are important for ensuring everyone in our community has a fair chance. Her advocacy for workers' rights and ending non-compete agreements could create more opportunities for Portland residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Forest Alexander high because of their strong background in human rights and open identification as a transgender spiritual leader, which speaks to a deep commitment to social justice and inclusivity. Their history as a Human Rights Commissioner in Austin, Texas, demonstrates a valuable focus on protecting vulnerable communities, a core progressive value important to Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Forest Alexander low because I could not find sufficient public information detailing his specific policy positions. Without a clear understanding of his stance on economic growth, property values, or public safety in Portland, it's impossible to assess how his governorship would impact my financial interests and the city's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because they prioritize housing justice with a 'Housing First' model and advocate for economic dignity, including ending non-compete agreements and supporting workers' rights, which are crucial for addressing systemic inequality. This approach directly challenges corporate interests and uplifts our most vulnerable residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because her background as a working-class trans woman and former Human Rights Commissioner in Austin demonstrates a deep commitment to social justice and human rights. Her critique of the current governor for not adequately addressing the SNAP crisis shows a focus on immediate, secular welfare issues, which is vital for a compassionate society, and aligns with my progressive values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear background as a Human Rights Commissioner and their focus on housing justice, disability rights, and economic dignity. These policies show a commitment to ensuring basic human needs are met and protecting vulnerable populations, which is a fundamental aspect of justice. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because their lived experience with housing instability brings an important perspective to the most urgent issue of housing justice. Their proposed solution of rent vouchers is a direct approach to help those struggling. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on a 'Housing First' model for homelessness is a step in the right direction. We need practical solutions to get people off the streets and make Portland safer for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because their platform emphasizes housing justice and disability rights, which are critical for building an equitable and inclusive Oregon. Their experience as a Human Rights Commissioner demonstrates a commitment to advocating for vulnerable communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because they advocate for housing justice and a leadership rooted in compassion, not corporate interests. This focus on equitable housing and challenging corporate power is essential for creating a society where everyone has a safe home and community well-being is prioritized over profit. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because Forest Alexander talks about "Housing Justice" and moving to a "Housing First" model. This focus on getting people into stable homes, not just temporary shelters, is what we need to see a real improvement in our neighborhoods. I value practical solutions that promise to make our communities more orderly and safe. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear commitment to social and economic justice, which is vital for our community. As a former Human Rights Commissioner, they advocate for housing justice, disability rights, and actively push back against corporate interests, showing true compassion for working people who struggle with housing instability. (0 votes)
#3
James Atkinson

Reason I rank this candidate low because reports of his arrest for theft, robbery, and criminal trespass raise significant ethical concerns. Public trust and ethical conduct are foundational values for a humanist, and these allegations undermine confidence in his ability to lead with integrity and serve the public good. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while some of his ideas, like stronger public transit and affordable high-density housing for Portland, align with my values, his past arrest for theft and criminal trespass raises serious concerns about his judgment and trustworthiness for public office. (4 votes)

Reason I rank James Atkinson lower because while he mentions climate change and housing, his 'no new taxes' stance does not align with the progressive need for increased public funding to address systemic issues. For us in Portland, investments in social programs are essential, and often require new revenue streams. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on 'adaptive governance' and balancing urban needs with rural concerns, while aiming for unity, ultimately dilutes the urgent need for bold, progressive policies to tackle systemic inequalities in our urban centers. While unity is good, it cannot come at the expense of addressing critical social justice issues with strong, clear action. His campaign emphasizes 'no new taxes,' which would severely limit our ability to fund necessary progressive programs. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his commitment to "fiscal responsibility" with "no new taxes" and his focus on addressing the concerns of rural Oregonians, including their traditional way of life and gun rights, resonates with a stewardship of resources and protection of fundamental freedoms. His Christian faith is also a positive indicator. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their commitment to 'no new taxes' and 'smarter use of the money we already have.' This directly aligns with the Libertarian value of fiscal responsibility and reduced taxation, which is crucial for economic freedom and preventing government overreach into individual wealth. His entrepreneurial background also suggests a market-oriented mindset. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he mentions homelessness and housing, his emphasis on 'no new taxes' is concerning for funding the robust social programs needed to uplift our community. Relying on an 'Endless Cup' to solve the water crisis also feels like a distraction from immediate, systemic issues, failing to prioritize the value of comprehensive, well-funded social support. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because James Atkinson talks about "adaptive governance" and finding practical solutions that respect both urban and rural Oregon, which sounds like a way to finally get things done. His focus on using existing money smarter and not raising taxes is important, as our family budget is already stretched thin. I value a leader who can bring people together and manage our state's money responsibly. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform explicitly states "No new taxes," which is a strong positive for the stock market. Avoiding new taxes directly helps corporate profitability and protects investor returns, which is the most important value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his innovative ideas like the 'Endless Cup' for water shortages are interesting, his past arrest for theft and robbery raises serious concerns about trustworthiness and judgment. Public safety and integrity are vital for a governor. (1 votes)

Reason I rank James Atkinson low because I could not find any specific information about his stance or policies on immigration. My vote is based solely on a candidate's commitment to protecting and supporting immigrants, and his platform does not provide this crucial information. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign platform focuses on issues like adaptive governance, fiscal responsibility, and water shortages, without addressing specific gender rights or reproductive freedom. For me, a candidate must demonstrate a clear commitment to gender equality. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he has some decent ideas for Portland, like supporting affordable high-density housing and public transit, his past legal issues and a 'no new taxes' approach make me question his ability to fund the extensive social programs our city desperately needs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because he acknowledges climate change as a pertinent issue and offers an innovative solution to water shortages. His 'Endless Cup' invention, designed to create water from the environment, could help Oregon adapt to climate impacts like drought, showing a focus on climate resilience. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any clear information about their stance on abortion or reproductive rights for their 2026 Oregon gubernatorial campaign. As a single-issue voter, it is essential to know a candidate's position on this critical issue to ensure they will protect and expand abortion access. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because they mention making "big investments in a healthcare for all system," acknowledging the need for universal healthcare. While this shows a positive direction, it lacks specific plans or a strong track record like other candidates, which is crucial for ensuring everyone has access to care. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while their platform mentions 'education' as a pertinent issue, there are no specific details or clear commitments regarding parental control in schools or over children's healthcare decisions. The lack of a strong, explicit stance on this vital issue means they do not align with my core value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low-medium because he talks about affordable high-density housing and better public transit for Portland, which is good. But his big focus on uniting rural and urban areas, including supporting rural gun laws, feels like it might water down the progressive values important to Portlanders for the sake of broad appeal. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his innovative proposal, the 'Endless Cup,' which aims to solve Oregon's water shortages using electrolysis and condensation technology. This science-based approach to a critical environmental challenge represents a pragmatic and rational solution, valuing scientific advancement to address real-world problems. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform, while mentioning affordable housing and clean energy for urban areas, also emphasizes 'no new taxes' and 'adaptive gun laws' for rural counties, which could undermine essential social services and progressive gun control efforts. The 'no new taxes' stance often means less funding for crucial public programs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because his platform emphasizes adaptive governance, fiscal responsibility, and uniting urban and rural Oregon, which promotes Artha (prosperity) and societal cohesion. His commitment to "No New Taxes" and finding practical solutions for issues like water shortages through innovation demonstrates responsible stewardship and a pragmatic approach to governance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank James Atkinson lower because while he talks about homelessness and climate change, his emphasis on 'no new taxes' for solutions is concerning for a progressive. Real systemic change often requires investment. His 'Endless Cup' invention for water, while interesting, feels less like a comprehensive approach to the complex challenges our state faces. I need a leader who is willing to fund solutions. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher than Tina Kotek because no specific anti-gun legislation or strong anti-gun statements could be found in their current capacity. Even though he was a Republican in 2006, his current Democratic candidacy does not automatically mean he is as hostile to gun rights as the current governor. The Second Amendment is a vital right, and a lack of a clear anti-gun record is a positive compared to a proven opponent. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear policy to respect rural areas and bring in new ideas to solve our problems. They talk about 'adaptive governance' which means solutions should fit our community, not just a one-size-fits-all approach from the city. This is important because many state rules don't make sense for us, and their focus on removing costly mandates that don't apply to rural areas and investing in wildfire prevention and jobs shows they understand our needs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate fourth due to his specific proposals for Portland, including stronger public transit and affordable high-density housing, which are vital for our city's sustainable growth. His innovative 'Endless Cup' idea to address water shortages shows forward-thinking on environmental challenges, which is a value I deeply appreciate. While his overall platform could be more detailed, these targeted solutions show a promising direction. (0 votes)

Reason I rank James Atkinson in the middle because his focus on innovation for water shortages, like his 'Endless Cup' invention, is a unique and practical approach to environmental challenges. His idea of 'adaptive governance' also speaks to finding solutions that fit different community needs, which is important for a diverse state like Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his crime-related stance on 'adaptive gun laws' mainly focuses on rural counties and responsible gun ownership, which isn't directly about solving Portland's urban crime problems. His discussions on prison rehabilitation also do not prioritize the immediate, tough actions needed to reduce crime in our city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his reported arrest for theft, robbery, and criminal trespass, even if charges were dropped, demonstrates a serious lack of judgment and integrity. A governor must be someone trustworthy and beyond reproach, especially when advocating for systemic change. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his stated emphasis on homelessness, housing, and the environment. These areas align with Catholic social teaching that calls for care for creation and preferential option for the poor. His focus on these issues shows concern for the vulnerable and the planet, which is a good sign for public welfare. (0 votes)

Reason I rank James Atkinson low because while his idea of 'adaptive governance' and finding new revenue streams instead of new taxes sounds good, his plans for solving problems like water shortages with inventions are less proven. I prefer more established and realistic solutions for Oregon's immediate challenges. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because they explicitly state 'no new taxes' and emphasize fiscal responsibility, which is crucial for over-taxed Oregonians. This commitment to limiting government spending aligns with my belief that citizens already pay enough, making it a top priority. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he talks about homelessness and climate change, his emphasis on "no new taxes" and adapting gun laws for rural areas doesn't align with the bold progressive action needed for a truly equitable and environmentally just Oregon. We need more than just avoiding taxes when so many are struggling. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because while his focus on homelessness, housing, and climate change is good, his core solution revolves around an 'Endless Cup' invention for water, which feels less like a comprehensive gubernatorial strategy. His emphasis on 'no new taxes' also may hinder funding for crucial social programs vital for a progressive agenda. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his platform, which includes strengthening public transit and creating affordable high-density housing specifically for Portland, directly addresses key urban challenges. His emphasis on practical, community-tailored solutions for critical issues like climate change is a positive step. (0 votes)

Reason I rank James Atkinson medium because he addresses important progressive issues like homelessness, housing, and climate change, which are crucial for Oregon's future. However, his emphasis on 'no new taxes' is a concern for truly funding robust social programs and environmental initiatives, which an extreme Portland progressive would prioritize even if it means increased taxes. (0 votes)

Reason I rank James Atkinson low because there is a lack of comprehensive information regarding his platform and proposed policies for Oregon's governorship. As a voter deeply invested in the state's economic stability and Portland's prosperity, I require detailed plans on how a candidate intends to address key issues before I can consider supporting them. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their strong opposition to jailing homeless people, calling it 'immoral', and their focus on providing housing solutions. This demonstrates a valuable concern for the dignity and well-being of all individuals, especially the vulnerable in our society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his innovative approach to water shortages, like the "Endless Cup" concept, addresses long-term environmental sustainability, an important value for Oregon's future. His push for adaptive governance could benefit diverse parts of the state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he talks about no new taxes and using the money we already have smarter. That’s a common-sense approach that helps working families keep more of their paychecks. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite some good ideas for Portland's public transit and housing, his recent legal troubles raise serious concerns about the stability and judgment required for a governor. Trust and reliability are paramount for effective state leadership. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while he proposes an innovative 'Endless Cup' to address water shortages, his past legal issues, including an arrest for theft and criminal trespass, raise concerns about personal conduct and judgment, which are crucial for public trust in a leader. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his innovative approach to environmental challenges, such as his 'Endless Cup' invention to create water from the atmosphere, and his focus on strengthening public transit and affordable high-density housing in Portland, demonstrates a forward-thinking and practical mindset. This emphasis on sustainable urban development and resource innovation is important for Oregon's future. (0 votes)
#4
Donnie Beckwith

Reason I rank this candidate worst because his past criminal charges, including a second-degree murder charge, are extremely concerning and make him completely unsuitable for public office. We need leaders who embody justice and integrity, not those with such a serious and violent history. (22 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because his past criminal charges for second-degree murder, even with a self-defense plea, and his negative comments about government make him unsuitable for a position that demands trust, stability, and effective collaboration. Public safety is paramount, and a governor must embody integrity. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low due to the lack of a clear economic platform and a somewhat critical stance on government. This ambiguity and potential for unpredictable policy changes are detrimental to investor confidence and the stability of the stock market. (2 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because his criminal history, including a past murder charge, and an unprofessional statement about governmental experience, make him an unacceptable choice for a leader who needs to inspire trust and stability. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate as the worst due to their documented past criminal charges, including a murder charge in 2020. Public safety and trust in leadership are paramount, and such a history raises serious concerns about their suitability for public office. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear public information available about their specific policies or plans to combat inflation in Oregon. Without a defined stance on this critical issue, it's hard to trust they will prioritize lowering the cost of living for Portland families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Donnie Beckwith low because I could not find any specific information about his stance or policies on immigration. As a single-issue voter, I need candidates to clearly outline their support for immigrant communities, and without this information, I cannot confidently rank him higher. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available information on their stance, policies, or plans regarding climate change or environmental protection for Oregon. As an extreme single-issue climate voter, a candidate must clearly articulate their commitment to this critical issue. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public record or stated platform detailing their position on parental rights concerning children's education or healthcare. For a single-issue voter, a candidate who has not prioritized or articulated support for parental control is not a viable option. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Donnie Beckwith very low because I found out he was charged with murder and has other past convictions. As someone trying to make it in a tough city, I need leaders who represent safety and stability, not someone with a violent history. This makes it impossible for me to trust him with leading the state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Donnie Beckwith low because there is no readily accessible public information about his candidacy or specific policy positions for the 2026 Oregon gubernatorial race. Without a clear understanding of his platform, I cannot evaluate his potential impact on my investments or the economic climate of Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any clear information about their stance on abortion or reproductive rights for their 2026 Oregon gubernatorial campaign. As a single-issue voter, it is essential to know a candidate's position on this critical issue to ensure they will protect and expand abortion access. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because I could not find any specific information on their healthcare policies or plans for Oregon. As a voter focused solely on healthcare, it is impossible to support a candidate who has not clearly stated their position on this vital issue, leaving their commitment to accessible care unknown. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher than Tina Kotek because no specific anti-gun legislation or strong anti-gun statements could be found. For a single-issue gun voter, the lack of an explicit record of undermining the Second Amendment, even within the Democratic party, is better than a candidate with a clear history of restricting gun rights. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because the lack of a clear, coherent policy platform and the unprofessional language used in his filing about government ("retarded STATE and Federal government") indicate a disrespect for institutions and a lack of Dharma (righteous conduct). Such an approach would not foster effective or respectful governance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their explicit anti-government stance, which directly champions the Libertarian value of limited government. Their statement on 'dealing with our retarded STATE and Federal government' shows a strong distrust of government overreach, indicating a desire for reduced state power, which is paramount for individual liberty. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low due to the lack of clear, actionable progressive policy details and a somewhat abrasive tone in their public statements. While they have a background in construction and coaching, their stated approach to government doesn't suggest a focus on the urgent social and environmental issues important to a progressive voter in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Donnie Beckwith low because there isn't any public information available about his policy positions or what he aims to do as governor. It's tough to support a candidate when their platform is unclear. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is a lack of publicly available information regarding their political platform or relevant experience for the role of Governor. For a humanist, transparency and a clear commitment to progressive policies are essential to assess a candidate's potential to contribute to the well-being of society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Donnie Beckwith very low because his campaign information includes derogatory language towards state and federal government, calling them 'retarded'. This kind of disrespectful and anti-government sentiment is completely unacceptable and goes against the cooperative spirit needed to solve Oregon's problems. It shows a lack of temperament and a disdain for public service. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific policy proposals or a detailed platform for the 2026 gubernatorial primary. Without clear information on their stances on critical issues like housing, wages, or social justice, it's impossible to see how they would represent my values as a Portland service worker. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because I could not find any specific public statements or clear policy proposals regarding crime, public safety, or strengthening law enforcement for his gubernatorial campaign. As a single-issue crime voter, I need concrete plans to address the crime issues in Portland, which are absent here. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his serious criminal history, including a charge for second-degree murder and prior juvenile convictions, makes him absolutely unacceptable for public office. We need leaders who embody justice and safety, not those with a violent past. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of the very limited and unprofessional nature of the available information on their platform. Their filing includes crude language regarding government, which does not reflect the respectful discourse and dignity expected in public service. The lack of clear policy positions makes it impossible to find alignment with important Catholic values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Donnie Beckwith lowest because there's very little information about his specific plans for Oregon, and his public statement about 'dealing with our retarded STATE and Federal government' is unprofessional. As a voter, I expect a governor to act with respect and professionalism, even when facing challenges. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, despite limited platform details, his past comments about 'dealing with our retarded STATE and Federal government' suggest a frustration with government overreach. This anti-establishment sentiment, though crudely expressed, resonates with my desire for less bureaucratic interference. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because no detailed public platform or specific policy positions have been made available, which means voters cannot make an informed decision about his potential impact on Oregon's future. Transparency on policy is crucial. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there's just not enough information out there about what they stand for as governor. When I look them up, there's no clear platform or detailed plans for Oregon, especially for rural areas. It's hard to trust someone to lead the state when they haven't shared their vision with the voters. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because of his use of offensive language when describing his interactions with government, as stated in his candidate information. This demonstrates a fundamental lack of respect and inclusivity, which is entirely contrary to the values of community, dignity, and Tikkun Olam that are paramount for a leader in our diverse state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because the available information lacks clear, detailed policy proposals, which is concerning for a gubernatorial candidate. Furthermore, the unprofessional language used in his candidate filing about dealing with government suggests a temperament ill-suited for effective leadership. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Donnie Beckwith last because of the unprofessional language used in his candidate filing, referring to government as 'retarded.' This shows a lack of respect for public service and a hostile attitude towards the very institutions he seeks to lead, which is unacceptable for a progressive leader. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough public information available about their specific policies or stance on issues critical to our community, making it impossible to assess their commitment to racial justice or economic equity. Without a clear platform, I cannot trust they will uphold the value of fighting for our collective liberation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available information about their specific policy positions or progressive stances for the 2026 gubernatorial election. Without a clear platform, it's impossible to assess their alignment with progressive values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of the significant lack of publicly available information about his specific policy stances for this election. Without a clear platform, it is impossible to discern his commitment to righteous governance or his respect for the foundational values that uphold our society. This uncertainty is a grave concern for a leader. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because the complete absence of a discernible public platform or specific policy proposals makes it impossible to evaluate their commitment to progressive values, which is a disservice to voters seeking transformative change. A serious candidate must clearly articulate their vision for Oregon's future, and without it, I cannot support them. Ballotpedia shows no completed candidate survey or detailed information. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because his publicly stated sentiment about dealing with 'retarded STATE and Federal government' indicates a dismissive and unconstructive attitude toward governmental institutions. This unprofessional rhetoric and lack of a coherent, progressive policy platform is antithetical to the belief in rational, effective governance and social progress. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any detailed information regarding their policy positions or background that would allow for a proper assessment based on my values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because I cannot find enough clear information about their specific policies or public service history to understand how they would help Portland. It's important to know what a candidate stands for. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his background is in general construction, and he talks tough about the government. That tells me he understands how things work on the ground and is tired of bureaucracy messing things up. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his past criminal history, including serious charges, makes him an unsuitable choice for governor. Public safety and a clear record are essential qualities for leading our state and inspiring public confidence. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there's no clear plan for how they would address the problems affecting our neighborhoods, like homelessness or public safety. The lack of specific proposals makes it impossible to understand their vision for Oregon's future. I value a candidate with a detailed and serious approach to governance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his public statement describing state and federal governments as 'retarded' in his candidate filing suggests a generalized anti-government sentiment that is counterproductive to the progressive goals of effective governance and systemic change desired by many Portland Democrats. Such rhetoric undermines the collaborative effort needed to solve Oregon's complex challenges. (0 votes)
#5
David Beem

Reason I rank David Beem low because his stated desire for both parties to 'work together' and his focus on making Oregon 'number one in the nation for jobs' feels more moderate than the transformative change an extreme Portland progressive seeks. His history of leaning Republican, despite being a Democrat, raises concerns about his commitment to core progressive social justice values. (9 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his general call for bipartisan cooperation and a focus on jobs, without specific, actionable progressive policies, fails to address the deep structural issues that prevent equitable opportunity and environmental justice in Oregon. While cooperation sounds good, it can't come at the cost of clear, bold action on issues like climate change and social equity, which are paramount. His platform lacks the specific progressive details I need to see. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their platform focuses on bipartisan cooperation and general job creation, which lacks the specific, bold progressive policies needed to address critical issues like housing and climate change in Oregon. While unity is good, it doesn't offer the clear direction or 'extreme' progressive solutions that are most important to me right now. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because David Beem's platform mainly talks about getting parties to work together and creating jobs, which are general goals. He doesn't offer specific plans for the urgent problems like homelessness or public safety that are really impacting our neighborhoods in the suburbs. I value a candidate who clearly outlines how they will tackle our most visible local issues. (2 votes)

Reason I rank David Beem low because I can't find almost any information about what he stands for or what his plans are for Oregon. When things are hard, I need to know a candidate has clear ideas on how to help people like me, and without that, I can't support him. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because I could not find specific tax policy statements. Without a clear stance on taxes, it's hard to assess the impact on voters, but the absence of proposed tax increases is preferable to candidates who have raised taxes. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any public information regarding their position or past actions on gender rights, including reproductive freedom or LGBTQ+ issues. As a single-issue voter, this lack of information means the candidate does not meet my primary criteria. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear public information available about their specific policies or plans to combat inflation in Oregon. Without a defined stance on this critical issue, it's hard to trust they will prioritize lowering the cost of living for Portland families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank David Beem low because I could not find any specific information about his stance or policies on immigration. For me, as a single-issue voter, a candidate's clear commitment to pro-immigrant policies is essential, and the absence of such information means he doesn't address my primary concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he aims to make Oregon "#1 in the nation for jobs," which could indirectly support a stronger economy and, by extension, the stock market. However, his platform lacks specific details on pro-business policies or tax strategies that would directly impact investor returns. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his stated reasons for running focus on bipartisan cooperation and job creation, without mentioning any specific policies or plans to address climate change in Oregon. For me, climate action is the most important issue, and his platform does not demonstrate a commitment to it. (1 votes)

Reason I rank David Beem low because I was unable to find any public information detailing his candidacy or policy stances for the 2026 Oregon gubernatorial election. It's essential for me to understand a candidate's specific proposals, especially concerning economic and urban development, to make an informed decision. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his stated desire for bipartisan cooperation and making Oregon a leader in job creation aligns with the value of Artha (prosperity) and a harmonious society. His commitment to working across party lines to achieve economic growth is a practical approach that can benefit all Oregonians. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any clear information about their stance on abortion or reproductive rights for their 2026 Oregon gubernatorial campaign. As a single-issue voter, it is essential to know a candidate's position on this critical issue to ensure they will protect and expand abortion access. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because I could not find any specific information on their healthcare policies or plans for Oregon. As a voter focused solely on healthcare, it is impossible to support a candidate who has not clearly stated their position on this vital issue, leaving their commitment to accessible care unknown. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while his advocacy for people with disabilities is important and aligns with valuing all human lives, his broader policy stances and consistency in political affiliation are not clearly articulated or consistently progressive. A humanist seeks clear, comprehensive plans for the betterment of all society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their public statements and campaign information do not provide any specific policies or a clear commitment to strengthening parental control over children's upbringing, education, or healthcare, which is my primary concern. This absence of a clear stance on such a crucial issue makes them an uncertain choice. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because they advocate for both parties, Democratic and Republican, to work together in the Legislature, and they want to make Oregon #1 in the nation for jobs. This emphasis on bipartisan cooperation and economic growth is a refreshing change from constant partisan division, which is critical for the state's prosperity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough public information available about their specific policies or stance on issues critical to our community, making it impossible to assess their commitment to racial justice or economic equity. Without a clear platform, I cannot trust they will uphold the value of fighting for our collective liberation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform, which largely focuses on bipartisan cooperation and job creation, lacks specific, bold progressive policies that address systemic social and environmental issues. While collaboration is valued, an extreme atheist from Portland seeks tangible commitments to social justice, secular governance, and science-based solutions beyond general calls for unity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank David Beem low because there's no public information available about his campaign or policy priorities for the Democratic primary. Voters need to know a candidate's stance on issues to trust them with leadership. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because there is no readily available information on their specific policy positions or platform for the 2026 gubernatorial race. As a Democratic candidate without a discernible pro-liberty stance, I must assume their views align with the party's general tendency towards increased government programs and regulation, which conflicts with Libertarian principles. (0 votes)

Reason I rank David Beem low because there is no readily available information about his platform or what he stands for. As a voter, I need to know a candidate's policies and values to make an informed decision, especially for a crucial position like governor. Without any details, I cannot support his candidacy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform focuses broadly on bipartisan cooperation and making Oregon #1 in jobs, which doesn't address the specific, urgent needs of service workers in Portland. While he supports unions, his overall message lacks the deep commitment to progressive social and economic justice that I'm looking for. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because I could not find any specific public statements or clear policy proposals regarding crime, public safety, or strengthening law enforcement for his gubernatorial campaign. As a single-issue crime voter, I need concrete plans to address the crime issues in Portland, which are absent here. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on bipartisanship and 'working together' between parties is not what an extreme progressive needs right now. We need bold leadership that pushes for systemic change, not compromise with those who actively oppose our values, and his past Republican affiliation is concerning. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because of his desire for bipartisan cooperation, which can foster unity and a search for common ground. He wants both Democratic and Republican parties to work together, reflecting a value in seeking consensus for the good of all citizens. However, his platform lacks specific details on issues most critical to our faith. (0 votes)

Reason I rank David Beem low because his platform, while aiming for bipartisan cooperation and more jobs, doesn't offer enough specific details on how he plans to address the pressing issues facing Portland. General goals are not enough; we need concrete plans for action. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because his public statements are too general, focusing on bipartisan cooperation and jobs, without specific, progressive policy details needed to address Portland's complex social and environmental challenges. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because I can't find any information about them or their plans for Oregon. It's important for a candidate to have a public platform so voters can understand what they would do if elected. Without any details, I have no way to know if they would represent my interests or the needs of rural communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while his call for bipartisan cooperation and valuing all people is admirable, his platform lacks specific, detailed progressive policies that address the urgent social justice and community needs of Portland. His past run as a Republican, despite current Democratic affiliation, makes his alignment with core progressive values less clear. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his primary stated goal of fostering bipartisan cooperation, while well-intentioned, lacks specific progressive policy details that an extreme Portland office worker would prioritize. Strong progressive leadership is more important than broad appeals to unity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank David Beem low because his platform emphasizes bipartisanship and making Oregon 'number one in the nation for jobs,' which sounds more aligned with corporate interests than with the strong progressive social and environmental justice goals important to Portland voters. His general focus lacks specific progressive policy details. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because while he has a long history of civic engagement and wants bipartisan cooperation, his past statements favoring Republicans on being tough on crime and his repeated unsuccessful runs for office indicate a lack of consistent Democratic vision and electability required for governor. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is insufficient information available about his specific progressive policy positions. His stated goals of working across parties and supporting unions are too general to demonstrate a clear commitment to the extreme progressive values needed for Oregon's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his past statements, where he favored Republicans for being 'tough on crime,' directly contradict the progressive values that are crucial for addressing root causes of injustice in Portland. His general policy positions lack the specific, bold actions needed for an equitable Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any detailed information regarding their policy positions or background that would allow for a proper assessment based on my values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his general call for bipartisan cooperation and job creation, while positive, lacks the specific detailed plans needed to tackle Portland's complex problems like housing and public safety. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no public information available about his policies or plans for Oregon. I can't vote for someone when I don't know what they aim to do for the state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available public information about his specific policy positions or qualifications for governor. A candidate for such a high office needs to be transparent about their vision for Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is very limited publicly available information regarding their policy positions or background for the 2026 gubernatorial race. Without clear details on their stance on critical environmental and social justice issues, it is difficult to assess their alignment with Green Party values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available public information detailing his specific policy positions or vision for governing Oregon as a Democratic candidate for Governor. Without a clear platform, it is impossible to assess his alignment with the critical progressive values and urgent issues facing Portland and the state. (0 votes)
#6
Brittany Jones

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong advocacy for children's futures, including creating safe spaces for transgender and BIPOC children and addressing gun violence. Her focus on indigenous leadership for environmental stewardship aligns with true justice and equity. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their strong commitment to social justice and the protection of marginalized communities. They advocate for indigenous rights, stating 'No one is illegal on stolen land', and prioritize ending religious persecution, which is crucial for upholding dignity and fairness for all people in Oregon. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high due to her commitment to environmental stewardship guided by Indigenous leadership. This approach respects ancestral knowledge and prioritizes a harmonious relationship with nature, which is vital for sustainable land management and climate resilience. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank Brittany Jones high because her platform prioritizes protecting vulnerable communities and the environment, which totally aligns with Portland values. She emphasizes safeguarding children, supporting the LGBTQIA2S and BIPOC communities, and using indigenous leadership for environmental stewardship, showing a real commitment to social justice. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her strong advocacy for indigenous rights, human rights reform, and the LGBTQIA2S+ community is essential for creating a truly equitable Oregon. Her grassroots approach and commitment to protecting all children, especially trans and BIPOC youth, shows she will fight for those often overlooked, making our state more inclusive. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while her commitment to protecting children and ensuring school safety is good, her strong progressive stance on certain social issues like transgender healthcare may not fully align with more traditional social values. Furthermore, an accusation of squatting, even if denied, raises concerns about Dharma and respect for the law. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because her explicit self-identification as a "witch" and her stated opposition to "the hate and ignorance the church is pushing" through the legal system fundamentally rejects the biblical foundation of our society and directly attacks the Christian faith. This stance is an irreconcilable conflict with my deepest religious convictions. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her focus on protecting children and advocating for safe schools and mental health aligns with critical community values for the future of Portland. Her grassroots approach offers a fresh voice. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her powerful stance on human rights and her deep connection to marginalized communities. Her platform, which states 'No one is illegal on stolen land,' directly supports indigenous and immigrant rights, which are fundamental values for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she identifies as part of the LGBTQIA2S community and has specifically voiced a commitment to creating safe spaces for transgender children. This focus on protecting vulnerable youth is a vital aspect of advancing gender rights and ensuring dignity for all. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she focuses on protecting children, environmental justice, and fair housing for everyone, especially for First Nations and BIPOC communities. These are key values for a more equitable Oregon, and her grassroots approach shows she listens to regular people, not just big money. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because her platform strongly advocates for environmental protection guided by indigenous leadership and the safety of all children, including LGBTQIA2S and BIPOC youth, which are crucial for a truly equitable Oregon. Her focus on marginalized communities is exactly what we need. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform emphasizes social and environmental issues like "environmental protection" and "people over policy." These priorities, while important, do not offer clear strategies to directly boost corporate earnings or investor confidence, which are critical for the stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she strongly advocates for 'tougher penalties against predators' and making our schools safer, which directly addresses important crime concerns. Her focus on using the governor's power to enforce laws and allocate resources for investigations shows a commitment to public safety. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while she talks about protecting children, which is important, and has a grassroots approach, some of her past actions raise questions. The news about her being accused of squatting in a building for her thrift shop makes me wonder about her judgment and ability to handle official duties. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any clear information about their stance on abortion or reproductive rights for their 2026 Oregon gubernatorial campaign. As a single-issue voter, it is essential to know a candidate's position on this critical issue to ensure they will protect and expand abortion access. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher than Tina Kotek because no specific anti-gun legislation or strong anti-gun statements could be found. As a single-issue gun voter, any candidate without a clear and proven record of actively working against the Second Amendment is more acceptable than one who has demonstrably restricted gun rights. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her primary healthcare focus appears to be on improving mental health resources, especially for children. While important, this is a narrower approach than comprehensive universal healthcare and doesn't clearly address the broader need for affordable access to all medical services for all Oregonians. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform heavily emphasizes environmental protection and protections for specific groups like BIPOC and LGBTQIA2S communities. While she claims to look beyond party lines, these are typical progressive policies that often lead to overregulation and division, which I believe harms the state as a whole. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong commitment to protecting BIPOC communities and First Nations, which shows a deep understanding of systemic injustice. Her policy to stop ICE from targeting our communities is a direct response to a critical value: the right to safety and freedom from oppressive state forces, which is paramount for our people. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her platform strongly advocates for the enforcement of the separation of church and state and emphasizes human rights reform, equality regardless of gender, sexual identity, or race. This is crucial for safeguarding individual liberties and ensuring a secular, inclusive government that respects the diverse values of all people. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while she advocates for the 'protection of children,' her platform includes 'creating safe spaces for children to express their identities, specifically mentioning transgender children.' This emphasis could lead to policies that undermine parental authority over critical decisions regarding a child's gender identity and related care, which is a key aspect of parental control. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate third because of her strong focus on protecting children and advocating for indigenous leadership in environmental stewardship. As a member of the LGBTQIA2S community and a supporter of First Nations, she brings a vital perspective on social equity. Her emphasis on ensuring clean water and forests for future generations aligns directly with our environmental values, making her a compelling choice for a progressive voter. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Brittany Jones third because her background includes indigenous and Mexican culture, and she advocates for creating safe spaces for vulnerable children, including BIPOC children. While not explicitly an immigration policy, this focus on protecting diverse and vulnerable populations aligns with the broader goal of supporting immigrant families in Oregon, which is very important to me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because their call for 'government accountability and transparency' and a desire to 'reform the rigged and dishonest two party system' resonates with Libertarian anti-establishment sentiment. This focus on improving governance rather than expanding it is important for holding power in check and protecting individual liberties. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Brittany Jones high because her platform strongly emphasizes protecting children, addressing gun violence, and improving mental health, which are critical issues for our community. As a military veteran and an LGBTQIA2S community member, she brings a vital perspective on social justice and advocates for Indigenous leadership in environmental stewardship, values I hold dear. She focuses on people, not just politics, which is refreshing. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her strong advocacy for children, including transgender and BIPOC youth, and her focus on environmental stewardship through indigenous leadership are vital progressive stances. As a human trafficking survivor and veteran, her dedication to creating safe spaces and improving mental health resources speaks to the systemic care we need. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear public information available about their specific policies or plans to combat inflation in Oregon. Without a defined stance on this critical issue, it's hard to trust they will prioritize lowering the cost of living for Portland families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low due to her explicit advocacy for equality across gender and sexual identity, and her strong criticism of 'the church' for pushing 'hate and ignorance'. These positions directly contradict fundamental Catholic teachings on marriage, gender, and the role of faith in public life. While advocating for children and housing is good, her anti-church rhetoric and conflicting social stances are irreconcilable. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Brittany Jones in the middle because her platform strongly advocates for children's safety, mental health resources, and fair housing. These are crucial issues for families in Portland, and her grassroots approach and background as a veteran and survivor bring a unique and dedicated perspective to leadership. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Brittany Jones third because she has a strong connection to vulnerable communities, having experienced homelessness and being a human trafficking survivor. Her focus on protecting children and improving mental health resources is so important for families in tough situations. It shows she understands the need for compassion and support in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her platform prioritizes children's futures, indigenous rights, and the LGBTQIA2S+ community, which are essential progressive values. As a military veteran and human trafficking survivor, her unique perspective and emphasis on 'people over policy' demonstrates a heartfelt dedication to protecting vulnerable populations and creating a more just society for all Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her strong advocacy for children's futures, including safer schools, addressing gun violence, and prioritizing environmental stewardship, aligns with vital Portland progressive issues. Her identity as an LGBTQIA2S community member and human trafficking survivor brings a crucial empathetic perspective. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Brittany Jones here because she advocates strongly for environmental protection and BIPOC community protections, which are essential for creating a truly equitable and sustainable Oregon. Her commitment to indigenous leadership in environmental stewardship aligns with the urgent need for climate action and social justice. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because her passion for protecting children and making schools safer aligns with a key community value for families in Portland. Her advocacy for mental health resources is crucial for the well-being of our youth. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Brittany Jones high because her platform prioritizes support for First Nations, environmental protection, and LGBTQIA2S+ rights, which are all vital for an equitable and sustainable future in Oregon. Her focus on protecting BIPOC communities and seeing 'people over policy' shows a true dedication to social justice, which is a key value for Portland progressives. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Brittany Jones low because there is not enough readily available information on her specific policy proposals for the governorship. As a high-income resident, I need to see clear, detailed plans regarding economic development, tax policy, and solutions for Portland's critical issues to confidently support a candidate. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because her platform emphasizes the protection of children's futures, improved mental health resources, and environmental stewardship guided by indigenous leadership. Her identity as an LGBTQIA2S community member and human trafficking survivor brings an essential perspective to social justice issues, which is crucial for creating an inclusive and equitable society based on human dignity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while she cares about kids and schools, her platform lacks clear plans for improving jobs or fixing our crumbling roads and bridges. I need to see concrete actions that help working families directly. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her strong advocacy for children's futures, including safer schools and environmental stewardship, aligns with my values for the next generation and protecting Oregon's natural resources. Her indigenous background offers a valuable perspective on environmental issues. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because Brittany Jones emphasizes public safety and wants to enforce tougher penalties on criminals, which is a concern in our community. However, her past situation regarding occupying a property for her non-profit raises questions about her respect for property rights and existing rules, which are essential for maintaining order in our suburbs. I value a leader who upholds the law consistently. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her clear commitment to environmental protection and indigenous leadership in addressing climate issues. Her focus on ensuring clean water and forests for future generations shows she values the planet, which is essential for our survival. (0 votes)
#7
Cal Kishawi

Reason I rank Cal Kishawi low because his approach to homelessness, suggesting converting vacant buildings away from residential neighborhoods, lacks the integrated and compassionate solutions that extreme Democrats in Portland advocate for. We need to help people within our communities, not move them out of sight. (15 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because Cal Kishawi wants to unite Oregon and solve problems in a practical way, which is what we need instead of constant fighting. His idea to convert vacant buildings into shelters for the homeless, specifically away from schools and neighborhoods, is a smart way to address the issue without impacting our suburban peace. I value common-sense solutions that improve our community's quality of life. (7 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low-medium because while his idea to convert vacant buildings into shelters for the homeless sounds practical, he also suggests putting them away from schools and residential areas. This raises concerns about isolating vulnerable people instead of integrating them into the community, which goes against the value of inclusive solutions. (5 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he wants to bring back shop classes like woodshop and automotive into schools. This is important for teaching young folks real skills and getting them ready for good manual jobs, which is what we need more of. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because I could not find specific tax policy statements. Without a clear stance on taxes, it's hard to assess the impact on voters, but the absence of proposed tax increases is preferable to candidates who have raised taxes. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Cal Kishawi low because I could not find any specific information about their stance or policies on immigration. A clear and strong position on immigrant rights is the most important factor for my vote, and the lack of this information is a significant drawback. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available information on their stance, policies, or plans regarding climate change or environmental protection for Oregon. As an extreme single-issue climate voter, a candidate must clearly articulate their commitment to this critical issue. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any clear information about their stance on abortion or reproductive rights for their 2026 Oregon gubernatorial campaign. As a single-issue voter, it is essential to know a candidate's position on this critical issue to ensure they will protect and expand abortion access. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because I could not find any specific information on their healthcare policies or plans for Oregon. As a voter focused solely on healthcare, it is impossible to support a candidate who has not clearly stated their position on this vital issue, leaving their commitment to accessible care unknown. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher than Tina Kotek because no specific anti-gun legislation or strong anti-gun statements could be found. Protecting the Second Amendment is my top priority, and a candidate who has not actively worked to restrict gun ownership is considered a better option than someone with a clear record of doing so. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because their emphasis on 'practical problem-solving' and suggestion to reduce 'ceremonial spending' by repurposing the governor's mansion shows a pragmatic approach to government efficiency. This focus on fiscal prudence and less wasteful spending, rather than ideological expansion of state power, is a moderate alignment with Libertarian values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his focus on expanding mental health capacity and repurposing the governor's mansion for women's shelters and family support demonstrates a practical and compassionate approach to societal challenges. This commitment to addressing mental health and supporting vulnerable families aligns with the humanist value of fostering societal well-being. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their policy on supporting women and families, which directly upholds the sanctity of family life. Kishawi has proposed repurposing the governor's mansion to generate revenue for women's shelters and family support, demonstrating a clear commitment to practical aid for vulnerable families. This focus on tangible support for family structures is a core value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Cal Kishawi low because while his proposals for converting vacant buildings into shelters and supporting women's services are practical, his emphasis on locating shelters 'away from schools and residential neighborhoods' suggests a less integrated approach to addressing homelessness. Portland progressives typically advocate for inclusive, community-based solutions rather than isolating vulnerable populations. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his focus on uniting people and restoring practical education, along with innovative solutions for homelessness, aligns with our community's need for harmony and Dharma. His idea to convert vacant buildings into shelters away from schools and homes shows practical wisdom and care for families and neighborhood sanctity. Supporting education that teaches useful skills also upholds traditional values of purposeful living. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his emphasis on 'basic humanity' and practical solutions, while well-intentioned, lacks the systemic analysis and bold progressive vision needed to address the root causes of our state's most pressing social and environmental crises. Focusing on 'tone' over 'ideology' misses the point that real change requires a clear, progressive ideological framework to challenge entrenched power structures. He wants to rebuild 'basic humanity' instead of fighting for specific progressive policies. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate fifth because of his pragmatic approach to homelessness, suggesting the conversion of vacant buildings into shelters, which could be a quick way to get people off the streets. His focus on expanding mental health capacity in corrections and offering alternatives to incarceration also aligns with social justice. His fresh, anti-establishment perspective, like repurposing the governor's mansion for women's shelters, shows a willingness to challenge the status quo, which is important for change. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Cal Kishawi low because I could not find any information regarding his campaign or platform. It's really important for candidates to share their vision so people can understand what they're voting for. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Cal Kishawi in the middle because I appreciate his focus on practical solutions for homelessness, like converting vacant buildings into shelters, and his emphasis on expanding mental health services. He wants to reduce political division and restore hands-on education, which are good intentions. However, he doesn't have as strong a record or detailed progressive platform on climate and social justice compared to others. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because I could not find any specific public statements or clear policy proposals regarding crime, public safety, or strengthening law enforcement for his gubernatorial campaign. As a single-issue crime voter, I need concrete plans to address the crime issues in Portland, which are absent here. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because while his proposal to repurpose the governor’s mansion for women's shelters and family support shows a good intention towards social services, his overall platform seems less focused on bold, ideological progressive change. I appreciate his emphasis on expanding mental health capacity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear public information available about their specific policies or plans to combat inflation in Oregon. Without a defined stance on this critical issue, it's hard to trust they will prioritize lowering the cost of living for Portland families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Cal Kishawi in the middle because his focus on practical solutions like converting vacant buildings for homelessness services and investing in vocational training for schools is a common-sense approach. These ideas could make a tangible difference in our communities and help people find stable ground. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because they focus on practical solutions for homelessness, like converting vacant buildings into shelters away from residential areas. This pragmatic approach is more appealing than generic 'housing first' policies and respects neighborhood concerns, which I believe is essential for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low-medium because his plan to convert vacant buildings into shelters directly addresses the immediate need for safe spaces for those experiencing homelessness, which is a practical step toward supporting our vulnerable neighbors. This pragmatic approach is a good starting point. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Cal Kishawi in the middle because he talks about practical solutions and expanding mental health services, which is really needed. Many people I know struggle with mental health issues, and getting help can be hard. His idea to use the governor's mansion for women's shelters shows a creative way to use resources for those who need it most, valuing community support. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his mission to 'Stand United' and focus on practical problem-solving for schools and mental health is vital for strengthening our communities. His innovative idea to repurpose the Governor's mansion for women's shelters and family support demonstrates a creative, community-centric approach to public service, showing empathy and practical care. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his focus on converting vacant buildings into shelters is practical, his suggestion to place them away from residential neighborhoods and schools, combined with his unconventional stance on not moving to Salem, indicates a less integrated approach to community problems than I prefer. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he talks about practical solutions for homelessness, his platform lacks explicit detail on how he will address systemic racial injustice and economic inequality that disproportionately affects our community. The value of specific, targeted action to dismantle oppressive systems is missing from his generalized approach. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he emphasizes practical problem-solving and wants to focus on schools and infrastructure, which is important for long-term community growth and stability. His commitment to uniting Oregonians and finding common-sense solutions shows a pragmatic approach to governance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Cal Kishawi low because I could not find any public information outlining his campaign or policy positions for the 2026 Oregon gubernatorial election. Without a clear and accessible platform, I cannot assess how his leadership would affect the state's economy or address the concerns of high-income residents in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available information about their specific policy positions or progressive stances for the 2026 gubernatorial election. Without a clear platform, it's impossible to assess their alignment with progressive values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his stated goal of "rebuilding basic humanity" and his pragmatic approach to homelessness, proposing to use vacant buildings away from schools and residential areas, reflects a concern for community safety and moral order. This shows a commitment to practical solutions that protect the innocent. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his unique idea to repurpose the Governor's mansion for women's shelters and family support shows innovative thinking for using state assets to address social needs. His focus on expanding mental health capacity to help people struggling with homelessness and addiction is a pragmatic approach to a complex problem that Portland deeply needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his pragmatic approach to homelessness, advocating for the conversion of vacant buildings into shelters, offers a practical and immediate solution to a pressing social issue. His idea to repurpose the governor's mansion for women's shelters demonstrates a commitment to secular social good and efficient use of public resources. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their practical approach to addressing homelessness by suggesting the conversion of vacant buildings into shelters. This shows a sensible and compassionate approach to helping those in need, prioritizing immediate solutions for the community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy to convert vacant buildings into shelters is a practical solution for homelessness, emphasizing efficient use of existing resources. This directly tackles a visible problem in our city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his focus on practical problem-solving and expanding mental health capacity is essential for a healthier and more unified Oregon. His approach to civic engagement, emphasizing basic humanity over division, is quite appealing. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he proposes repurposing the Governor's mansion to generate revenue for women's shelters and family support. This creative approach to redirecting resources for social services shows a commitment to community well-being and addressing vital social needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because I appreciate his practical ideas focused on community needs and mental health, which are often overlooked. His proposal to repurpose the governor's mansion for women's shelters and family support shows an innovative and direct way to help vulnerable people. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his policy proposal to convert vacant buildings into shelters and service hubs for those experiencing homelessness, coupled with his focus on expanding mental health capacity, shows a practical and compassionate approach to a pressing issue in Oregon. This emphasis on efficient resource utilization and mental health support is crucial for addressing the crisis effectively. (0 votes)
#8
Steve William Laible

Reason I rank this candidate worst because his proposal to create 'Humanitarian Hubs' in rural areas to move the homeless 'outside of our backyards' is an unacceptable and inhumane approach. This plan clearly conflicts with the compassionate, housing-first, and community-integrated solutions that Portland desperately needs and progressive values demand. (9 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his proposed 'Humanitarian Hubs' for the homeless, which aim to move them from neighborhoods to rural areas, directly conflicts with the progressive value of integrated community support and solutions. This approach feels like segregation rather than addressing the root causes of homelessness within existing communities, making him an unsuitable choice for an extreme progressive. (6 votes)

Reason I rank Steve William Laible last because his proposed 'Humanitarian Hubs' for the homeless, moving them to rural areas to 'de-segregate them from society,' is completely inhumane and goes against every progressive value I hold. This approach is not a solution; it's an attempt to hide a problem and would cause immense harm to vulnerable people. We need compassionate, integrated solutions, not segregation. (5 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform primarily focuses on issues such as homelessness and community revitalization, with no stated positions or historical actions related to gender rights or reproductive freedom. This lack of focus means he does not align with my top priority. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear public information available about their specific policies or plans to combat inflation in Oregon. Without a defined stance on this critical issue, it's hard to trust they will prioritize lowering the cost of living for Portland families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because they propose moving the homeless to rural 'Humanitarian Hubs,' which is a practical way to clear our city streets. This policy prioritizes public order and community safety, values I find most important for Portland, instead of enabling continued encampments. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher than Tina Kotek because no specific anti-gun legislation or strong anti-gun statements could be found. For a gun owner, the absence of a stated intent or history to erode Second Amendment rights, even from a Democratic candidate, is a crucial factor in their favor. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no accessible public information detailing their views or proposed policies regarding parental control in matters of children's education, healthcare, or upbringing. Without a clear commitment to these fundamental parental rights, this candidate cannot earn my support. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his primary solution for homelessness, establishing 'Humanitarian Hubs' in rural areas, risks displacing and isolating vulnerable populations rather than integrating them into communities. This approach conflicts with progressive, community-centered solutions for housing insecurity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their stated healthcare policy, "5-Star Healthcare with affordable scripts," is too vague and comes from a past campaign. There isn't enough specific information about how they would ensure comprehensive, affordable healthcare access for all Oregonians, which is the most important issue. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any clear information about their stance on abortion or reproductive rights for their 2026 Oregon gubernatorial campaign. As a single-issue voter, it is essential to know a candidate's position on this critical issue to ensure they will protect and expand abortion access. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because his distinguished military service signifies discipline and dedication, which are respected qualities. However, without a clear and comprehensive platform outlining his specific policies for governing Oregon, it is difficult to fully assess his alignment with our community's needs for prosperity and order. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his proposal to move homeless people to 'Humanitarian Hubs' in rural areas is not a compassionate solution. This approach feels like pushing a problem out of sight rather than solving it with real community integration, which goes against my value of supporting all members of our community, especially the most vulnerable. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his emphasis on a "moral code & values" and his specific plan to address homelessness through "Humanitarian Hubs" outside of neighborhoods suggest a desire for order and community well-being, which aligns with biblical principles of righteous governance. His clear intention to address the issue, even with an unusual solution, is appealing. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because their plan for homelessness is very direct, and that could be good for our communities. He wants to move the homeless population to 'Humanitarian Hubs' in rural areas, which could help clean up our parks and towns. While it's a big change, it sounds like an organized way to handle a tough problem that impacts all of Oregon, not just the cities. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Steve William Laible low because there's no public record of his campaign or policy goals. A lack of transparency makes it impossible to evaluate his suitability for governor. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while they claim 'Oregon taxpayers deserve better' and emphasize individuals succeeding 'on their own terms,' their proposed 'Project Tenderheart' to resolve homelessness appears to be a large-scale government-led initiative. Such extensive state programs contradict the Libertarian value of limited government and often lead to increased spending and bureaucracy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is a lack of publicly available information regarding their political platform or relevant experience for the role of Governor. For a humanist, transparency and a clear commitment to progressive policies are essential to assess a candidate's potential to contribute to the well-being of society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his 'Oregon Destination Pilot program' directly tackles visible crime and disorder in our neighborhoods caused by homelessness. His plan to move the homeless population to designated 'Humanitarian Hubs' aims to restore public spaces and remove the 'hustle' from our streets, which is crucial for public safety in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he states a priority to resolve the homelessness crisis, his 'Project Tenderheart' plan sounds vague and idealistic rather than offering concrete, detailed, or proven systemic solutions. I want a leader with clear, actionable strategies, not just broad concepts. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because there is virtually no public information available about their background, policy positions, or any specific stances. Without any details to evaluate, it is impossible to determine if they align with or oppose any of our core values, making them the least discernible choice among the candidates. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Steve William Laible low because his plan to address homelessness by moving people to rural 'Humanitarian Hubs' is too extreme and doesn't seem like a compassionate solution for our community. While I want to see our parks and downtowns cleaned up, I don't believe simply relocating vulnerable populations is the right approach for Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is no publicly accessible information about his policy positions for the gubernatorial race. It's impossible to make an informed decision without knowing his platform. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Steve William Laible lower because while he says solving homelessness is his top priority, his main idea, 'Project Tenderheart,' sounds a bit vague. I need more details to know if it would truly help people experiencing homelessness with respect and dignity, or if it's just about moving them somewhere else. My value is that solutions need to empower people, not just relocate them. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his experience is predominantly in a distinguished military career and publishing, which does not directly translate to the specific progressive social and economic policy leadership needed for Oregon. While his service is commendable, a governor requires a clear vision for advancing social justice and community welfare that isn't evident in his background. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Steve William Laible very low due to his proposal for 'Humanitarian Hubs' to move homeless populations to rural areas, which is a problematic and segregationist approach that is completely against the inclusive values of Portland. This policy fails to address the root causes of homelessness and further marginalizes vulnerable individuals. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough public information available about their specific policies or stance on issues critical to our community, making it impossible to assess their commitment to racial justice or economic equity. Without a clear platform, I cannot trust they will uphold the value of fighting for our collective liberation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because his primary focus is on addressing homelessness through "Humanitarian Hubs," which is a social initiative. While a stable society can indirectly help the economy, his platform lacks specific policies that would directly enhance corporate profits or boost investor confidence in the stock market. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because his military background shows discipline, but his unconventional 'Project Tenderheart' for homelessness and past unsuccessful election bids suggest he may lack the broad, practical solutions needed to lead the state effectively. We need clear, proven leadership. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Steve William Laible lowest because there is no readily available public information about his platform or experience as a Democratic candidate for Governor of Oregon. Without any policy positions or a clear history to evaluate, it is impossible to determine if he aligns with the progressive values important to Portland voters. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Steve William Laible low because there is no readily available public information regarding his candidacy or specific policy proposals for the 2026 Oregon gubernatorial race. A lack of transparency on key economic and civic issues makes it impossible for me to consider him a viable option. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his proposed 'Project Tenderheart' for homelessness, which aims to 'de-segregate' individuals into a new 'civilization,' sounds overly structured and potentially isolating. True progressive solutions prioritize integration and community support, not separation, for people experiencing homelessness. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because the complete absence of a discernible public platform or specific policy proposals makes it impossible to evaluate their commitment to progressive values, which is a disservice to voters seeking transformative change. A serious candidate must clearly articulate their vision for Oregon's future, and without it, I cannot support them. I could not find any readily available public information about this candidate's platform for this race. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because their proposal to move homeless people to 'Humanitarian Hubs' outside of neighborhoods raises serious concerns about human dignity and forced displacement. This policy appears to lack compassion and could lead to the segregation of vulnerable individuals, which contradicts principles of justice and equity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because I found no publicly available information on their specific policy proposals or past experience, which is essential for an informed decision when voting for a governor. It's difficult to support a candidate whose plans are unknown. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because I couldn't find any information about him running for Governor or any of his policy positions. If I can't find anything, he hasn't shown he's serious about fixing things for us. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his commitment to resolving the homelessness crisis is commendable, his proposed 'Project Tenderheart' sounds like an unconventional approach. A long-term, proven strategy is crucial for such a complex issue. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, although he prioritizes resolving the homelessness crisis, his proposed 'Project Tenderheart' seems more institutional than community-led. This top-down approach may not align with the holistic, grassroots solutions many believe are needed to address the complex needs of unhoused individuals. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is no readily available information on their specific policy positions or how they plan to tackle the urgent issues facing our communities, such as rising homelessness or local safety. It's hard to support someone when their vision for Oregon is unclear. I value transparency and a clear platform. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he focuses on resolving the homelessness crisis, his proposed 'Project Tenderheart' solution for 'de-segregating' people from society sounds like a large-scale, isolated approach. Our community needs integrated, dignified solutions, not something that might further separate vulnerable people. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because my research yielded no substantial public information regarding his specific policy proposals or a clear vision for his Democratic gubernatorial campaign in Oregon. This lack of a discernible platform makes it impossible to evaluate his commitment to the progressive values and urgent issues that are paramount for Portland voters. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his publicly available platform focuses on homelessness and public safety, with no mention of climate change or specific environmental policies for Oregon. As an extreme single-issue climate voter, I need to see a clear commitment to addressing the climate crisis. (0 votes)
#9
Tristan Sheppard

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is very little public information available about their specific policy stances or progressive vision for Oregon. Without a clear platform on crucial issues like affordable housing, climate action, or social equity, it is impossible to determine if they align with the urgent needs and progressive values important to voters in Portland. (19 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is very limited information available regarding his economic policies or stance on business. The lack of a clear platform creates significant uncertainty for investors, which is a major deterrent for the stock market. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because while their background in public safety is commendable, there's no clear plan on how they will address the state's biggest challenges, like the ongoing homelessness crisis or the need for more affordable housing in our suburbs. We need a governor with a comprehensive vision beyond emergency response. I value a detailed and actionable plan for our state's future. (2 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available public information detailing their stance or history on gender rights, reproductive freedom, or LGBTQ+ equality. Without clear evidence of their commitment, I cannot support them as a single-issue voter. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Tristan Sheppard low because I could not find any specific information about their stance or policies on immigration. My entire vote is determined by a candidate's stance on immigration, and the absence of such information means I cannot support this candidate. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their past role as an Environmental Service Director for a non-profit. This experience shows a direct, practical commitment to environmental protection, which is the most critical value for the health of our planet and future generations. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Tristan Sheppard lowest because I could not find any significant information about his campaign, policies, or experience. It's important for a candidate to have a clear platform and public presence, especially when running for governor, so voters know what they stand for. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher than Tina Kotek because no specific anti-gun legislation or strong anti-gun statements could be found. The fundamental right to bear arms is paramount, and a candidate who has not publicly moved to restrict this right is always preferable to one who has. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is almost no information available about his specific policy positions or vision for Oregon as governor. Without a clear platform, it's impossible to see how he would address the critical social and economic challenges facing our communities. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear public information available about their specific policies or plans to combat inflation in Oregon. Without a defined stance on this critical issue, it's hard to trust they will prioritize lowering the cost of living for Portland families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Tristan Sheppard low because there's not enough information available about his specific policies or what he plans to do as governor. For me to choose a candidate, I need to see clear proposals on how they will address the challenges faced by low-income residents, and his platform is largely unknown. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite filing for the election, there is a lack of detailed public information about their specific policy positions or vision for Oregon. A humanist requires clear articulation of how a candidate intends to address societal issues and uphold human values to merit support. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any clear information about their stance on abortion or reproductive rights for their 2026 Oregon gubernatorial campaign. As a single-issue voter, it is essential to know a candidate's position on this critical issue to ensure they will protect and expand abortion access. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because I could not find any specific public statements or clear policy proposals regarding crime, public safety, or strengthening law enforcement for his gubernatorial campaign. As a single-issue crime voter, I need concrete plans to address the crime issues in Portland, which are absent here. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because I could not find any specific information on their healthcare policies or plans for Oregon. As a voter focused solely on healthcare, it is impossible to support a candidate who has not clearly stated their position on this vital issue, leaving their commitment to accessible care unknown. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their publicly available information and stated experience, primarily in public safety as a volunteer firefighter and EMT, do not include any specific positions or strong advocacy for parental control in children's education or healthcare decisions. This lack of focus on my key issue is concerning. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough public information available about their specific policies or stance on issues critical to our community, making it impossible to assess their commitment to racial justice or economic equity. Without a clear platform, I cannot trust they will uphold the value of fighting for our collective liberation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, based on available information, his platform is not detailed enough on issues critical to Portland service workers like affordable housing, living wages, or specific social justice initiatives. While his background in public safety is important, it doesn't clearly show how he would advocate for our economic and social values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough public information available about their specific policy stances. While their background in public safety as a volunteer firefighter and EMT is commendable for community well-being, without clear positions on issues such as life, family, or social justice, it is difficult to determine alignment with core values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of the significant lack of detailed policy positions available through public information. While his background in public safety and emergency response is noted, without a clear progressive platform on social justice, environmental protection, or secular governance, it is impossible to determine alignment with the values of an extreme atheist in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because their background is incredibly relevant to the safety of our rural communities. Being a volunteer firefighter and a wildland firefighter and engine captain means they know firsthand the struggles we face with emergencies, especially wildfires. That kind of real-world experience is valuable for a governor, even if their full platform isn't widely known yet. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because there is no readily available information on their specific policy positions or platform for the 2026 gubernatorial race, beyond a background in public safety. As a Democratic candidate without a discernible pro-liberty stance, I must assume their views align with the party's general tendency towards increased government programs and regulation, which conflicts with Libertarian principles. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his background in public safety and emergency response is valuable, his platform lacks specific progressive policies on critical issues like climate action, housing affordability, or social justice. We need a governor with a clear vision for systemic change, not just general operational experience. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because there is little public information about their specific policy stances. Without a clear progressive platform, they are less objectionable than candidates with explicitly liberal agendas, making them a relatively unknown factor. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is a significant lack of publicly available information on his specific policy proposals for the gubernatorial election, making it difficult to assess his commitment to critical issues. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while his background in public safety as a volunteer firefighter and EMT is valuable, there is very little public information available about his specific policy positions or vision for Oregon that aligns with the deep social justice and community-focused values I prioritize. A strong leader needs to articulate a clear progressive agenda. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is a severe lack of public information regarding their specific policy positions or political experience for the gubernatorial race. Without a clear platform, it's impossible to evaluate how they would address the pressing issues facing Portland and Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Tristan Sheppard low because there is not enough readily available information about their specific policy positions or progressive vision to earn my support. As an extreme Democrat, I need clear evidence of a strong commitment to our values to confidently rank a candidate higher. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because while his background as a volunteer firefighter and EMT demonstrates public service, there is very little public information available about his specific policy positions or a comprehensive vision for governing Oregon. A governor needs a clear plan for the entire state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Tristan Sheppard low because, while his background in public safety is commendable, there is no clear information available on his specific progressive policy stances for Oregon. A candidate for governor needs a detailed platform addressing critical issues like housing, climate, and social equity for an extreme Portland progressive to consider them. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Tristan Sheppard low because I could not find any public information detailing his candidacy or policy positions for the 2026 Oregon gubernatorial election. As a discerning voter, I need to see concrete plans and a clear vision for the state's economic future before I can offer my support. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available information about their specific policy positions or progressive stances for the 2026 gubernatorial election. Without a clear platform, it's impossible to assess their alignment with progressive values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low due to the absence of any discernible public record or detailed platform for his gubernatorial campaign. This lack of transparency makes it challenging to evaluate his dedication to serving the community according to biblical principles, leaving voters without a clear understanding of his vision. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough readily available public information about his specific policy positions or vision for Oregon. To make an informed decision, I need to understand how a candidate plans to address the pressing issues facing Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because the complete absence of a discernible public platform or specific policy proposals makes it impossible to evaluate their commitment to progressive values, which is a disservice to voters seeking transformative change. A serious candidate must clearly articulate their vision for Oregon's future, and without it, I cannot support them. Ballotpedia shows no completed candidate survey or detailed information. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any detailed information regarding their policy positions or background that would allow for a proper assessment based on my values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is very little public information available about their specific platform or what they plan to do for Oregon, which makes it hard to trust they have a clear vision for Portland's challenges. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I couldn't find enough clear information about his plans for Oregon. I need to know what a candidate stands for and how they will help working people before I can support them. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his extensive background as a volunteer firefighter and EMT demonstrates a strong commitment to public service and community safety. This practical experience in emergency response is valuable for protecting all Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his extensive background as a volunteer firefighter and EMT demonstrates a strong commitment to Seva (selfless service) and protecting our community. While his specific policy platform for governor is not yet fully detailed, his proven dedication to public safety and emergency response shows a valuable commitment to the well-being of Oregonians. This service is a foundational value for a harmonious society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his background in public safety as a volunteer firefighter and EMT indicates a commitment to community service, his campaign lacks detailed progressive policy proposals for governing Oregon that align with the broader social justice and environmental priorities of an extreme Portland Democrat. Without a clear progressive vision, his candidacy feels less impactful for the state's most pressing issues. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available information on their stance, policies, or plans regarding climate change or environmental protection for Oregon. As an extreme single-issue climate voter, a candidate must clearly articulate their commitment to this critical issue. (0 votes)
#10
Miranda Weigler

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her dedication to dismantling financial barriers to civic participation, like exorbitant filing fees, and her focus on genuine public discourse are essential for making our political system accessible and truly democratic for all Oregonians. The importance of democratic access cannot be overstated, as it ensures that diverse voices, not just the wealthy, can contribute to our governance. She couldn't afford a $3,000 filing fee for the voters pamphlet, which is just wrong. (14 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her personal experience, working two part-time jobs and struggling with rent, shows she understands the daily financial grind many service workers face. Her focus on making politics more accessible and talking about the real cost of living reflects a commitment to government transparency and economic fairness for everyday Oregonians. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her focus on redesigning political and economic systems around real human lives directly addresses core societal inequalities. Her experience in cannabis policy and civic education shows a pragmatic, evidence-based approach to governance, valuing concrete solutions over ideological posturing. This prioritizes human well-being and rational policy. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because she focuses on transparent and accessible politics, aiming to redesign systems for real human lives, which is a powerful message for change. Her background in civic education and addressing housing, childcare, and economic pressures shows she understands the struggles of everyday Oregonians. Her commitment to open conversation and honesty is a crucial value for voters who feel unheard. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her background as a civic educator and her critique of systemic failures, particularly regarding the high cost of living and barriers to political participation like exorbitant filing fees, reflect a crucial desire to dismantle unjust systems and empower ordinary Oregonians. This commitment to equitable access and challenging the political establishment is vital for a truly democratic and affordable Portland. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because I could not find any relevant information about their tax policies. Without a clear stance, it's impossible to evaluate the impact on taxpayers, but they haven't advocated for tax increases. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her message about 'genuine politics' and criticizing the 'status quo' sounds good, but it doesn't tell me how she's going to put food on my table or make Portland safer. I need to see real solutions, not just talk about the system. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Miranda Weigler low because I could not find any specific information about their stance or policies on immigration. For an extreme single-issue immigration voter like me, a candidate must demonstrate clear support for immigrant communities to earn a higher ranking. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her public statements and campaign information emphasize civic education, housing, labor, and juvenile justice, but do not provide any specific positions or history on gender rights issues. This makes it impossible for me to assess her commitment to my core value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher than Tina Kotek because no specific anti-gun legislation or strong anti-gun statements could be found. In the absence of a direct threat to gun rights, I prioritize candidates who do not have a documented history of supporting measures that undermine the Second Amendment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any clear information about their stance on abortion or reproductive rights for their 2026 Oregon gubernatorial campaign. As a single-issue voter, it is essential to know a candidate's position on this critical issue to ensure they will protect and expand abortion access. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because I could not find any specific public statements or clear policy proposals regarding crime, public safety, or strengthening law enforcement for her gubernatorial campaign. As a single-issue crime voter, I need concrete plans to address the crime issues in Portland, which are absent here. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because I could not find any specific information on their healthcare policies or plans for Oregon. As a voter focused solely on healthcare, it is impossible to support a candidate who has not clearly stated their position on this vital issue, leaving their commitment to accessible care unknown. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her focus on redesigning systems to serve "real human lives" and addressing practical concerns like housing and economic pressures reflects a commendable concern for societal welfare. As a mother, her understanding of family needs is valuable, aligning with the importance of supporting the family unit. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because she is a civic educator advocating for redesigning political and economic systems to better serve 'real human lives.' Her grassroots approach and personal struggle to afford campaign fees highlight the need for a more equitable political process, a value that resonates deeply with those seeking systemic change for the common good. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because there is no readily available information on their specific policy positions or platform for the 2026 gubernatorial race. As a Democratic candidate without a discernible pro-liberty stance, I must assume their views align with the party's general tendency towards increased government programs and regulation, which conflicts with Libertarian principles. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because of her focus on the real struggles of families in Oregon, which aligns with Catholic social teaching on supporting the common good. She highlights concerns about housing, childcare, and economic pressures faced by mothers and families, aiming to make politics more responsive to people's daily lives. This emphasis on family well-being is vital for a flourishing society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low-medium because Miranda Weigler highlights the high cost of living in Oregon and struggles for families, which many of us feel deeply. While her focus on a "regenerative economy" sounds promising for the future, it doesn't offer clear, immediate solutions for issues like visible homelessness or public safety that affect our daily lives in the suburbs. I value direct and urgent action on our most pressing local problems. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Miranda Weigler low because I found no public information about her candidacy or her policies. It's crucial for candidates to have a visible platform so voters can learn about their positions. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is a lack of publicly available information regarding their political platform or relevant experience for the role of Governor. For a humanist, transparency and a clear commitment to progressive policies are essential to assess a candidate's potential to contribute to the well-being of society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Miranda Weigler here because she's a non-traditional candidate who is actually talking about the real economic pressures facing Oregonians, like housing affordability and the high cost of running for office. Her background in civic education and focus on labor and juvenile justice shows she cares about systemic issues and wants to bring new voices to our political discourse. It’s important to challenge the status quo. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest as I could not find any information about her political stances, background, or campaign for governor. It's impossible to support a candidate without knowing their vision for Oregon and how they align with progressive values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear public information available about their specific policies or plans to combat inflation in Oregon. Without a defined stance on this critical issue, it's hard to trust they will prioritize lowering the cost of living for Portland families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she critiques the financial barriers in politics and aims to redesign systems to serve everyday people, highlighting that political costs exclude many from participating in democracy. Her critique of system failures resonates deeply. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Miranda Weigler last because there is almost no public information about her campaign, her policies, or her background for the governor's race. I need to know a candidate is serious and has a plan to help people struggling with everyday costs and housing, and without any information, I cannot trust her to represent my interests. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her commitment to challenging the political status quo and bringing fresh ideas to critical areas like housing, labor, and juvenile justice is refreshing. As a civic educator, she shows a deep understanding of systemic issues and a desire for meaningful public discourse. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Miranda Weigler in the middle because she highlights the financial barriers to running for office, which is a vital point for reforming our political system to be more inclusive. Her focus on housing and labor policy, as a civic educator and single mom, shows a real understanding of everyday struggles that resonate with progressive voters. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her focus on economic justice through tax reform and advocating for healthcare for all, which is important for addressing deep-seated inequalities. Her commitment to government transparency and auditing how funds are spent to benefit people, not corporations, aligns with the value of holding power accountable and ensuring resources uplift the community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her focus on the everyday economic struggles of families, like housing and childcare, is relatable to many in Portland. Her grassroots approach to politics highlights the importance of making government accessible to everyone, but her campaign is less established. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Miranda Weigler medium because her focus on reforming political and economic systems that fail people, along with her experience in cannabis policy and juvenile justice, aligns with a desire for systemic change. Her critique of traditional campaign funding, such as not being able to afford the voters pamphlet fee, highlights a commitment to making politics more accessible and less beholden to money, a value that resonates deeply in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Miranda Weigler low because there is a complete absence of public information regarding her campaign or policy stances for the 2026 Oregon gubernatorial election. Without any articulated plans on critical issues like economic development or urban revitalization, I cannot make an informed judgment on her suitability for the role. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her focus on transparency in campaign finance, like the cost of voters' pamphlet fees, and her desire to reinvigorate public discourse are vital for a healthy, inclusive democracy. Her background in cannabis policy and juvenile justice also suggests a progressive approach to systemic issues. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite being listed as a candidate, there is no comprehensive public information regarding her policy positions or past political actions for the 2026 primary. This profound lack of a public profile prevents me from assessing her suitability for leadership, particularly her adherence to moral and just governance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available about her background, policy stances, or campaign goals. Without any details, it is impossible to evaluate her suitability for leading Oregon and addressing the issues important to urban residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while they speak about local issues like housing, labor, and juvenile justice, I found no specific information on their stance regarding international human rights or policies that deeply resonate with the core values important to my community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her emphasis on making politics more accessible and addressing systemic failures speaks to the core value of democratic participation. Her focus on issues like housing and labor is appreciated. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any public information about her candidacy or platform for governor. Transparency and a clear vision are expected from those seeking to lead our state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because despite her background as a single mom and civic educator, her stated priorities and public information do not specifically address or advocate for parental control in children's education or healthcare. The absence of this key issue in her platform is a significant concern for me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her platform emphasizes transparency and accessible politics, aiming to shift focus from insiders to real people. This commitment to democratic reform and empowering citizens is a fundamental value for ensuring government accountability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is no public information available about her campaign, policies, or what she stands for. Without any details, I cannot make an informed decision or trust that she would represent the interests of our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available information on their stance, policies, or plans regarding climate change or environmental protection for Oregon. As an extreme single-issue climate voter, a candidate must clearly articulate their commitment to this critical issue. (0 votes)

Republican Candidate for Governor

#1
Danielle Bethell

Reason I rank this candidate high because she has executive experience as a County Commissioner, which means she actually runs things and gets results, instead of just debating ideas. Her leadership in getting hard drugs recriminalized shows she's serious about public safety, which is a big concern for folks in Portland. (13 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she has real executive experience running Marion County and is pushing for local control. She helped get HB 4002 passed, which recriminalized hard drugs, showing she's serious about public safety and not just talking about it. We need someone who has actually made government work, not just another politician. (9 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her demonstrated history of advocating for parental control in education, which is essential for protecting our children. As a former school board member, she voiced concerns about schools 'stealing their innocence' by pushing identity politics and explicitly states her plan to 'anchor parents' rights' as governor. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their work to expand access to addiction treatment and behavioral health services, especially for rural communities and the unsheltered. However, their past opposition to mask mandates shows a concerning lack of support for public health measures, which is important for preventing widespread illness. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform emphasizes active forest management and opening up forests for natural resource access to reduce housing costs. While wildfire prevention is important, prioritizing increased logging and deregulation over aggressive climate action is concerning for reducing carbon emissions and protecting Oregon's natural carbon sinks. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she has a track record as a Marion County Commissioner of focusing on fiscal responsibility and protecting property rights. These efforts to curb government spending and protect individual ownership are fundamental to economic freedom. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her small business ownership and focus on streamlining state permitting and stopping the Corporate Activity Tax. Reducing the tax burden and red tape on businesses fosters economic growth, which is a key driver for a healthy stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her proven history of tackling public safety head-on by leading the effort to recriminalize hard drugs, which is essential for cleaning up our streets. Her executive experience in Marion County shows she can actually get things done, unlike career politicians. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific public statements or actions regarding their stance on gun rights in Oregon. For a single-issue gun voter, a lack of information on this critical topic means I cannot be confident in their commitment to protecting the Second Amendment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because of her criticism of the current governor for protecting illegal immigrants and her desire to clarify who should be in Oregon. Her county also sued to challenge sanctuary laws, showing a willingness to act on this issue, which is important for accountability. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her commitment to stopping back-door sales taxes like the Corporate Activity Tax directly benefits businesses by reducing hidden financial burdens. This policy is crucial for fostering a more favorable economic environment and improving profitability for companies. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her instrumental role in repealing Measure 110 and recriminalizing drugs directly undermines harm reduction efforts and disproportionately targets our community, which is a major step backward for justice. Her focus on 'homeownership, not more apartment complexes' also shows a fundamental misunderstanding of Portland's urgent need for diverse affordable housing options beyond just property ownership. Furthermore, the ethics investigation into her conduct raises serious red flags about accountability and integrity, demonstrating a disregard for ethical governance that our communities cannot afford. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Danielle Bethell high because of her proven executive experience as a County Commissioner and her direct involvement in repealing Measure 110, which recriminalized hard drugs. This shows a commitment to public safety and accountability, crucial for bringing order back to our streets and upholding the rule of law. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Danielle Bethell high because she brings real executive experience from Marion County, where she balanced budgets without raising taxes. She's also been a strong advocate against Measure 110, showing she understands the need for accountability in addressing addiction and homelessness. Her practical, hands-on approach to making government work is a refreshing change, valuing effective leadership over political talk. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her experience as a Marion County Commissioner focusing on public safety and government efficiency. Her track record of turning 'crisis into progress' at the local level suggests she can bring practical, results-driven conservative solutions to the state, which is important for effective governance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Danielle Bethell high because her focus as a county commissioner on practical solutions for public safety, including reforming Measure 110 to both re-criminalize drugs and expand treatment, shows a balanced approach to community well-being. This values effective local governance and addressing the root causes of problems. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because the available information focuses on undoing tax hikes related to transportation, which doesn't provide enough insight into her stance on broader social justice, education, or human rights issues critical to humanism. The lack of detailed positions on these core values makes it difficult to support her from a humanist viewpoint. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her public statements and platform focus on local issues, small business support, and government accountability. While these are important, I could not find clear plans or a strong stance on reducing crime in Oregon, which is my main concern as a voter in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because of their background in local government. While their platform is generally conservative, having experience as a Marion County Commissioner suggests an understanding of practical governance, which could be less disruptive than an inexperienced hardliner. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while she is a registered Republican who believes in freedom and fiscal responsibility, her public statements do not clearly address core moral and social issues that are paramount for our faith. Strong leadership requires a clear moral stance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their public record, while showing some targeted property tax waivers for wildfire survivors, doesn't emphasize broad tax reduction as a core policy. Their focus seems more on county-level issues and public safety, which is not my single issue. Plus, there are ongoing ethics investigations, which is concerning. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her experience as a Marion County Commissioner demonstrates a practical approach to local conservative governance, prioritizing public safety and fiscal discipline. This hands-on executive experience is valuable for tackling issues like homelessness and government efficiency, which are essential for our state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because her work establishing recovery housing for parents and couples fighting addiction shows a pragmatic approach to addressing a challenging social issue, which demonstrates some community benefit. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while she focuses on bringing people together and finding solutions, her platform doesn't have clear details on how she would directly help low-income residents with things like housing or the cost of living. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because as a Marion County Commissioner, she has experience in local government and focuses on public safety and government efficiency. These are important issues for our communities, and her work at the county level shows a commitment to practical solutions. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her background as a Marion County Commissioner and her emphasis on public safety, efficient government, and fiscal conservatism. Local government experience often translates to practical solutions that benefit communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because while her emphasis on public safety and government efficiency is noted, a lack of specific, publicly available stances on critical social issues makes it difficult to assess her potential impact on progressive values, keeping her in a cautious middle ground. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her practical executive experience as a Marion County Commissioner, showing she can manage government and deliver results. Her focus on repealing Measure 110 and prioritizing public safety and economic growth aligns with my desire for a safer and more prosperous Oregon. This hands-on leadership is important for tackling our state's problems instead of just talking about them. (0 votes)

Reason Danielle Bethell's campaign focuses on public safety and government efficiency, which are important, but the ongoing ethics investigation into her conduct as a county commissioner is a serious concern. We need a governor with unquestionable integrity to restore trust in our state government. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low due to serious ethical concerns and anti-progressive stances. She is currently facing multiple ethics investigations, including allegations of using her public office to benefit her family and a firm employing her son. Additionally, her past actions on public school issues and alleged dismissal of racism conflict sharply with progressive values of transparency, accountability, and social equity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her effective leadership in repealing Measure 110, which shows a commitment to restoring law and order and addressing the drug crisis. Her actions demonstrate a desire to improve public safety and community well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she advocates for cutting red tape for housing and criticizes the governor's handling of public safety and illegal immigration in Portland, which is a strong stance on issues impacting our urban core. However, the ethics investigation is a concern. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she has real executive experience as a County Commissioner, successfully balancing budgets without raising taxes and actively pushing for the recriminalization of hard drugs. Her hands-on leadership shows a commitment to public safety and fiscal restraint, which are essential values for restoring order and prosperity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she emphasizes public safety and government efficiency. A focus on public safety directly contributes to a stable and secure environment, which is fundamental for any community to thrive and for its residents to live free from fear. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her experience as a Marion County Commissioner shows she understands how to run government and deliver public safety solutions at a local level. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her experience as a Marion County Commissioner shows she has practical experience in government, focusing on public safety and efficient spending, which are important for making our communities work better for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because she has proven executive experience as a County Commissioner, which is vital for governing, not just debating. She's focused on real-world solutions for affordability, public safety, and housing, and her efforts to balance county budgets without raising taxes are exactly what Oregon needs statewide. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because as a Marion County Commissioner, her focus has often been on reducing regulatory burdens and promoting economic development, which historically leads to less stringent environmental review and greater urban sprawl. This prioritization of short-term economic gains over long-term ecological planning directly conflicts with the Green Party's commitment to sustainable land use and environmental protection. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her record as a Marion County Commissioner shows a clear dedication to public safety and fiscal responsibility, alongside a stance against government overreach. These actions protect individual liberties and ensure a secure and economically stable environment, which are vital for families and businesses to thrive. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her experience turning 'crisis into progress' at the county level shows she is a practical leader who can deliver tangible results, which is what Oregon desperately needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her support for crisis pregnancy centers that promote 'life affirming decisions.' While her direct abortion stance isn't explicit, her actions and focus on 'parents' rights' suggest a leaning towards protecting unborn life, which is a positive for this voter. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her experience as a Marion County Commissioner shows she can handle real executive responsibilities, focusing on public safety and balancing budgets without raising taxes. She's pushing back against 'Portland-first policies,' which is essential for the rest of the state. Her work on wildfire recovery and behavioral health also shows a practical, results-oriented approach. (0 votes)
#2
Hope Dalrymple

Reason I rank Hope Dalrymple low because I could not find enough clear information about her specific policy proposals or her political background. When choosing a governor, it's important to know exactly what a candidate stands for and their plan to address the critical issues facing Oregon. Without that clear vision, it's hard to trust she can lead our state effectively. (8 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while she mentions faith, family, and freedom, her background is mostly in digital creation and various service jobs with no prior government experience. Her platform lacks the specific, actionable conservative policies needed to tackle Oregon's serious issues. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is insufficient public information available about her specific policy positions or platform for governor. A serious candidate needs to clearly communicate their plans for Oregon's future to earn a traditional voter's support. (2 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is not enough specific information available about her plans for Oregon to make an informed decision for governor. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no publicly available information regarding specific economic policies, tax proposals, or business regulations that would directly impact the stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find specific information about their stance on taxes in Oregon. As a single-issue taxes voter, a lack of clear policy on tax reduction makes it difficult to support their candidacy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any publicly available information that clearly outlines her specific stance on parental control in education or children's healthcare, which is the most important issue for my vote. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any information on their immigration policy. As a single-issue voter, a candidate's stance on immigration is paramount, and the absence of this information makes them an unfavorable choice. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because the lack of detailed policy positions, coupled with a background in "Advanced Biblical Studies," indicates a likely alignment with conservative social values that typically run counter to progressive ideals. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find specific information on her economic policies or plans to combat inflation. Without clear proposals on taxes, spending, or regulation, it is difficult to assess her commitment to my primary concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because I could not find any specific information about their healthcare policies or plans. Without a clear stance on healthcare, I cannot determine their suitability for addressing the most important issue facing Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because her educational background includes advanced biblical studies, which suggests a foundation in faith. While specific policy stances on moral issues are not detailed, this background is a positive indicator for a candidate. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I couldn't find enough specific policy information about her plans for Oregon. As a middle-income voter in Portland, I need to know a candidate's concrete ideas for improving our state, and without that, it's hard to support them. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available public information on their stance regarding gender rights or abortion, which creates significant uncertainty for voters. Transparency and a clear commitment to reproductive freedom are important values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find clear information about her specific plans for addressing affordable housing, homelessness, or the high cost of living in Portland for the 2026 election. It's hard to support a candidate without knowing how they'll help. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific public statements or actions regarding their stance on gun rights in Oregon. For a single-issue gun voter, a lack of information on this critical topic means I cannot be confident in their commitment to protecting the Second Amendment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough publicly available information on her specific policy positions to determine a clear commitment to limited government and individual liberty. A lack of transparent policy proposals makes it difficult to trust her alignment with libertarian values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low due to the complete lack of specific policy information. Without any discernible stances or prior governmental experience, there's no basis to believe they would represent the progressive interests of Portland, leaving a vacuum likely filled by standard conservative views. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available regarding her stance on abortion. As a single-issue voter, it is crucial to know a candidate's position on protecting unborn life, and without any information, she cannot be considered a viable option for advancing this core value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is very limited information available about her specific policy positions for governor. Without clear stances on issues like social justice, education, healthcare, or environmental protection, it is impossible to determine how her leadership would align with humanist values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is a lack of publicly available information regarding their specific policy proposals for the gubernatorial election, making it difficult to assess how they would address key concerns such as fiscal conservatism, tax reduction, or economic growth important to high-income residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because, while she is running as a Republican, there is no public information on her specific conservative policy positions or relevant governmental experience to address Oregon's serious issues. Her background as a digital creator and various other roles does not demonstrate the leadership needed for governor. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because there is little public information available on their specific policy positions for this gubernatorial race. While a lack of extreme rhetoric might be a temporary relief, it also means there's no clear commitment to addressing the urgent issues of racial justice, housing, or police accountability that plague Portland. This absence of a defined platform leaves voters in the dark, making it difficult to trust that their leadership would bring any meaningful change or uphold the values of equity and community empowerment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while her diverse work history shows adaptability, there is not enough specific policy information available to clearly align her with the strong conservative values I seek in a governor. A clear platform is important for voters to make informed decisions. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Hope Dalrymple low because, as a declared candidate, there is no readily available public platform or specific policy proposals to evaluate her on, which makes it impossible to know if she would address the pressing issues in Oregon. This values transparency and clear policy communication from candidates. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find enough information about her specific plans or platform for the Oregon Governor's race. It's hard to support someone when their vision for fixing our state isn't clear to the public. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific policy proposals or statements on their stance regarding crime and public safety in Oregon. As a single-issue voter, it's crucial for a candidate to clearly address how they will make our communities safer. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because she lacks prior governmental experience and has not presented clear, specific policy stances that align with the extreme rural Republican viewpoint. Her diverse occupational background does not substitute for a strong conservative platform for governor. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while she has declared her candidacy, there is limited public information available regarding her specific policy proposals on critical issues like public safety and economic stability, which are paramount for ensuring a secure and thriving community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because she has no prior governmental experience and her occupational background as a digital creator doesn't demonstrate the executive leadership or policy-making skills necessary to govern Oregon. We need experienced leaders to fix our broken state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of the very limited public information available regarding their specific policy positions, which makes it impossible to determine if they would uphold or undermine the progressive values important to our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is very little publicly available information regarding her specific policy positions or campaign platform for the Republican nomination for Governor of Oregon. Without clear details on her stance on critical issues like public safety, the economy, or education, it is impossible to evaluate how she would address the serious problems facing our state. Transparency in policy is important for voters. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because, while running as a Republican, there is a distinct lack of detailed, overtly anti-progressive policy stances in her public profile. Her minimal governmental experience and focus as a 'digital creator' suggest a less traditional political background, making her less likely to be a formidable opponent against a progressive candidate in the general election. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest due to a complete lack of publicly available information about her specific policy positions for the 2026 Oregon gubernatorial race, making it impossible to assess her suitability for governing Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her professional background as a digital creator and photographer doesn't provide the necessary experience for the demanding role of governor. We need someone with a proven track record in government or substantial leadership, not someone new to public service, to tackle Oregon's serious problems. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is no readily available information regarding their specific policy positions or public statements that would indicate alignment with secular governance, scientific reasoning, or progressive social values, making them an unknown and unlikely choice for an extreme atheist. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low due to the lack of available public information regarding her specific stances and platform for the upcoming election. A leader must clearly articulate their vision for the state, and without such clarity, it is impossible to assess their suitability for office. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because, despite a diverse work history that includes being a farm worker, there is little public information on her specific policy proposals for governor that would directly benefit manual workers in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Hope Dalrymple low due to a lack of publicly available information about her specific policy positions or a clear conservative platform for the gubernatorial race. As a voter, I need to understand a candidate's concrete plans and values to support them, and this information is currently missing. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is limited current public information available on her specific platform for the 2026 gubernatorial race. Without clear and recent details on her stances on crucial issues like public safety and parental rights, it is difficult to confidently assess her commitment to the values important for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while her diverse entrepreneurial background shows a strong work ethic, there is not enough specific policy information available to determine if she aligns with the urgent conservative changes our state needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available about their stance on climate change or environmental policies. For a single-issue climate voter, the absence of a position on the most critical issue facing Oregon indicates a lack of priority for environmental protection, which is unacceptable. (0 votes)
#3
Ed Diehl

Reason I rank Ed Diehl highly because he is a true fiscal conservative who will rein in government spending and cut taxes. He plans to cut state spending by 10% and reduce taxes and fees by 8%, which will put thousands of dollars back into the pockets of hardworking Oregon families. Fiscal responsibility is crucial to stop the waste in Salem and make Oregon affordable again, a value he clearly prioritizes. (14 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear and strong policy to cut taxes for Oregonians, saving taxpayers money. He actively led a campaign against a $4.3 billion transportation tax increase, showing a real fight for lower taxes. This is important because it directly reduces the financial burden on residents, letting them keep more of their hard-earned money. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highly because he actively defends traditional moral values, which is crucial for our community's spiritual health. His vocal opposition to expanding gender-affirming care and blocking transgender girls from girls' sports shows a strong stance against policies that contradict biblical teachings. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because they support undoing significant parts of Oregon's sanctuary law and increasing cooperation with federal immigration authorities to target violent offenders. This action would strengthen law enforcement and protect our communities, which is essential. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear legislative action in protecting parental control over their children's healthcare decisions. He actively opposed House Bill 2002, which would have allowed minors to access abortions and sterilizations without parental consent, demonstrating a strong commitment to parental authority. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear plan to cut state spending by 10% and reduce taxes and fees by 8%. This directly tackles the runaway government spending that fuels inflation and makes everyday life more expensive for families. (1 votes)

Reason Ed Diehl is a strong conservative who clearly understands that our schools have been corrupted by woke ideologies like DEI. His commitment to getting DEI out of schools and focusing on basic education is vital for protecting our children from harmful progressive agendas. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong legislative history against abortion. He is endorsed by Oregon Right to Life, an extreme anti-abortion group, and has proposed bills to prohibit late-term abortions and public funding for abortions. This consistent policy aligns with the critical value of ending abortion access. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he advocates for prohibiting the Department of Environmental Quality from enforcing rules related to motor vehicle fuels or emissions without legislative approval. This policy risks halting or reversing critical efforts to reduce air pollution and greenhouse gases, which directly impacts the health and climate of Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his strong focus on restoring public safety, reforming public education with parental rights, and fiscal responsibility are essential for a flourishing community. These policies ensure that our children are raised with strong values and that our state's resources are managed wisely, which supports overall societal harmony. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because he is committed to restoring law and order and backing our police. He wants to end public camping that has caused so much disorder in our city and will work to change state laws that stop law enforcement from cooperating with federal authorities to remove dangerous criminals. This shows a real commitment to public safety. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their strong and active defense of Second Amendment rights. Ed Diehl has explicitly stated his unwavering support for the Second Amendment, believing our rights are non-negotiable. He actively fought against House Bill 4145, which would have made it harder and more expensive to exercise our constitutional right to bear arms by creating a de facto firearm registry with increased fees and delays. This shows he will protect the fundamental right to self-defense. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he is a strong conservative who actively fights against tax increases. He led a major effort to block a $4 billion gas tax increase, showing he will stand up for taxpayers. Fiscal responsibility is key to making Oregon affordable for families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Ed Diehl lowest because his past campaign platform heavily focused on divisive social and culture war issues like parental rights and anti-vaccine mandates, which directly conflict with the progressive and inclusive values of young Portland residents. This actively rejects policies that create division and ignore tangible problems. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he has focused on fiscal policy and criticizing state tax and fee structures. His efforts to advocate for less government burden on small businesses and individuals aligns with reducing state overreach and increasing economic liberty. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because his stance on sanctuary laws, specifically expressing a desire to 'get the bad guys out here' and cooperating with federal immigration enforcement, indicates a potentially less compassionate and more punitive approach to immigration. This could lead to policies that undermine the human dignity and rights of all individuals, a core concern for humanists. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he's a no-nonsense leader focused on cutting taxes and making government accountable. He wants to audit every state agency to stop wasteful spending and reform Measure 110 to get serious about drug addiction. This shows he cares about working families not getting ripped off by bad policies. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their strong conservative positions. Their self-identification as a conservative Republican and criticism of 'progressive policies adopted in Portland' directly clashes with the values that extreme Portlanders uphold, making them an unfavorable choice. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his plan to cut state spending by 10% and oppose new tax increases is a smart way to make Oregon more affordable. As a middle-income resident, I want a governor who will make the government live within its means, just like my family has to. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he is a true conservative who fights for fiscal responsibility, as shown by his leadership against the governor's huge gas tax increase. His background as a businessman, not a career politician, means he will bring accountability to state spending and reduce the burden on taxpayers, which is crucial for Oregon's economic health. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy to "Protect girls' sports—no males in female competitions" directly discriminates against transgender youth and contradicts the crucial value of inclusivity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he was endorsed by a candidate who had specific plans for lower taxes for low-income individuals and a first-time homebuyer credit. If he follows through on those ideas, it would be a positive step for people like me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong commitment to fiscal responsibility and supporting rural communities. He promises to cut taxes and fees by 10%, which is vital for families and small businesses struggling with government overreach. His efforts to lead a grassroots campaign against a $4.3 billion gas tax show he truly fights for taxpayers. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because of his strong stance on fiscal responsibility and his experience fighting against new taxes. Economic stability and careful management of resources are crucial for the well-being and prosperity of our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong stand against higher taxes and his commitment to government accountability. He led the charge against the huge gas tax, which is exactly what we need to make life affordable again in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he voted to extend the tax on health insurance plans and hospitals, which helps fund the Oregon Health Plan and is a concrete action to maintain healthcare for people living near the poverty line. Supporting Medicaid funding is vital for broad access. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his staunchly conservative and pro-life stance directly threatens reproductive freedom, a fundamental right that is deeply valued and legally protected in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear commitment to fiscal responsibility and lower taxes, which directly benefits hardworking families and small businesses. His plan to cut state spending by 10% and audit every state agency shows he values accountability and efficiency in government. This focus on sound financial management is vital for allowing individuals to keep more of their earnings and for economic prosperity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is a lack of specific, detailed policy proposals for his gubernatorial campaign that clearly outline how he would address fiscal conservatism or promote economic growth in a way that directly benefits high-income residents. Without a compelling platform, his impact on key financial priorities is unclear. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because as a State Representative, his emphasis on 'freedom' and anti-mandate positions typically translates into policies that undermine public health initiatives and collective well-being, directly opposing progressive values of community care and evidence-based governance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he clearly states his commitment to conservative pro-life values, which is paramount. He understands that our faith and families are everything and that we must stand up for these ideals. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he consistently calls out the failure of "leftist policies coming out of Portland" and prioritizes auditing state agencies to ensure taxpayer money is spent wisely, which is crucial for fixing our financial mess. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he is a conservative businessman who has actively fought against government overreach and new taxes, specifically leading the charge against a massive gas tax increase. His focus on fiscal responsibility and challenging progressive policies from Portland is crucial for protecting the financial well-being of all Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he explicitly identifies as a 'Christian family man' and is 'Pro-life (endorsed by Oregon Right to Life PAC),' which clearly indicates his intent to infuse religious dogma into public policy, directly conflicting with the essential separation of church and state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his reputation for focusing on fiscal policy and advocating for small business. Responsible financial management and supporting local enterprise are important for the economic stability of the state, which indirectly contributes to overall societal well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his commitment to cutting state spending by 10% and freezing property taxes for seniors shows he cares about our pocketbooks. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he stands up for taxpayers by fighting against big tax increases, like the recent gas tax. As a businessman and engineer, he has shown he knows how to manage budgets and wants to audit state spending, which means our money won't be wasted. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he is a staunch conservative who actively fights against progressive overreach and burdensome taxes. His leadership in opposing the $4.3 billion gas tax and his proposals to freeze property taxes for seniors and cut state spending show he's serious about protecting taxpayers and making Oregon affordable again. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his long-standing and extreme anti-government, anti-regulation stance would lead to the dismantling of environmental agencies and critical protections. This ideology threatens to undo decades of progress in safeguarding Oregon's air, water, and biodiversity, directly opposing our fundamental value of environmental stewardship. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Ed Diehl highly because he has a proven track record of fighting against tax increases, like leading the charge to delay a significant transportation tax package. His platform also promises to cut state spending by 10% and freeze property taxes for seniors, which directly addresses the crippling cost of living and aligns with my value of responsible, limited government. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his commitment to auditing state agencies and shifting away from 'equity' initiatives in government shows he prioritizes fiscal responsibility and common-sense solutions over progressive agendas. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear, strong conservative policies that directly address the problems facing Oregon. He wants to cut taxes, make our streets safe again, and restore discipline in schools, which is exactly what we need to take back our state from far-left control. He has a proven record in the legislature fighting these battles, like leading the effort against the gas tax. (0 votes)
#4
Christine Drazan

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her commitment to law and order, which is critical for restoring safety in our communities. She explicitly pledges to repeal Measure 110, which decriminalized hard drugs, a policy that has devastated Portland and made our streets unsafe. Getting rid of this policy is the most important step to bring back order. (13 votes)

Reason I rank Christine Drazan highest because she has a clear, strong plan to restore law and order, which is essential for Oregon, especially here in Portland. She promises to fully fund the police and hold activist district attorneys accountable, which is exactly what we need to get crime under control and make our streets safe again. This focus on public safety is the most important value for me, as our communities cannot thrive if people don't feel secure. (8 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest among viable options because she explicitly stated she would tear up Governor Brown's cap-and-trade executive order on 'Day One' and has a history of leading legislative walkouts to block climate bills. This actively works against crucial efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, directly threatening Portland's future environmental health. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate as one of the worst because her established record and policies are fundamentally opposed to progressive values. She has consistently opposed abortion rights, even cheering the overturning of Roe v. Wade and pledging to veto legislation expanding abortion access. This direct threat to reproductive freedom, coupled with her alignment with a 'MAGA agenda' and opposition to affordable housing, makes her a significant danger to the well-being of Oregonians and progressive achievements. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because she has largely avoided clear stances on immigration, which makes her position unclear on my most important issue. While she has spoken about public safety, her lack of direct commitment to immigration enforcement is a concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her consistent platform focuses on lowering taxes and reducing regulations. This creates a more favorable business environment, which historically leads to economic growth and a healthier stock market, directly benefiting my investments. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of her past opposition to declaring healthcare a universal right and her dismissal of addiction stabilization centers. These stances work against the fundamental goal of expanding access and treatment for all Oregonians, which is my top priority. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her steadfast commitment to protecting unborn life, which is the most important value. She clearly states she will veto legislation that expands abortion access and opposes taxpayer funding for abortion, a stance vital for upholding the sanctity of life in Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because her 'tough on crime' policies, explicit call for 'fewer needles and more cops,' and strong stance on reversing Measure 110 would only exacerbate the criminalization of poverty and addiction in our city, directly harming marginalized communities. Her rhetoric, blaming 'far-left policies' for homelessness and her voting record against tenant protections, clearly demonstrates a lack of empathy and a punitive approach to social issues. This stance directly clashes with the urgent need for housing justice and police accountability, making her a dangerous choice for Portland. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her clear policy to eliminate Oregon's unique death tax is essential for wealth preservation and provides significant financial security for families. This policy ensures that the assets accumulated by high-income residents can be passed on more effectively to future generations. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her platform supports parental control in education, including curriculum transparency and the right to opt-out, which is important for parents. She also supports broad exemptions for childhood vaccinations, aligning with the value of parental decision-making in children's health. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her unwavering stance on religious freedom, which is a foundational value. She supports including religious exemptions in laws to prevent government overreach into our faith-based hiring and insurance choices, protecting the right of believers to live according to their conscience. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her commitment to public safety and her opposition to "far-left policies" that undermine social order. Her plan to tackle homelessness with "fewer needles and more cops" shows a clear dedication to restoring stability and moral cleanliness to our communities, which is essential for a peaceful society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their consistent voting record and public stance against gun control. Christine Drazan has an 'A' rating from the National Rifle Association and worked to kill House Bill 3076B, which would have created an extreme gun dealer licensure program. Her actions show she will uphold our constitutional right to own firearms. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she consistently champions public safety and fiscal responsibility, which are core values for our community. Her plan to repeal Measure 110 and re-fund the police directly addresses the rampant crime and disorder we see, and her commitment to cutting taxes and regulations shows she understands how to unleash Oregon's economy for small businesses and families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Christine Drazan medium because her consistent advocacy for public safety and Measure 110 reform, based on her experience as a former House Minority Leader, indicates a serious commitment to addressing visible problems in our state. This values experienced leadership that aims to restore order. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because her platform includes broad goals like fixing schools and ending homelessness, which are important humanist concerns. However, without specific, detailed plans on how these will be achieved in a compassionate and equitable way, it is hard to fully assess alignment, making her position less ideal from a humanist perspective. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because while she stated she would respect existing Oregon abortion law, her voting record against codifying abortion rights into state law shows a clear opposition to expanding and protecting gender rights for voters. The advancement and safeguarding of reproductive autonomy is a crucial value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she has a clear plan to fix our broken state, especially on public safety and homelessness. She wants to declare a state of emergency for homelessness and repeal Measure 110, which has made our streets worse. This shows she understands that enabling bad behavior is not compassion, and we need real accountability to make Portland safe again. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because she has a clear, strong plan to fight crime in Portland and across Oregon. She specifically promises to repeal Measure 110, which decriminalized hard drugs, and to hold district attorneys accountable for not prosecuting criminals. This focus on getting tough on crime and supporting law enforcement is exactly what Portland needs to feel safe again. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their consistently conservative record. Their opposition to emissions trading, vaccine mandates, and transgender athletes in sports directly contradicts the social and environmental values important to many in Oregon, especially in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their consistent history of opposing tax increases and advocating for lower taxes on working families and businesses. They openly criticized a large transportation tax increase, saying it would burden Oregonians. This commitment to reducing the tax load is important for making our state more affordable. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her focus on making Oregon more affordable directly helps my family's budget. She has a clear plan to cut taxes on working families and repeal regulations that drive up gas and food prices, which is important for people like me trying to make ends meet in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her history as House Minority Leader shows she is a proven fighter against radical leftist policies in Oregon, actively blocking measures and pushing for conservative change. Her strong focus on issues like public safety and repealing Measure 110 directly addresses the decline in our cities, which is vital for restoring law and order and protecting our communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because her stance to combat homelessness with "fewer needles and more cops" directly opposes compassionate and evidence-based solutions, which harms our community's most vulnerable. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she focuses on lowering the cost of living and addressing homelessness directly. She talks about high taxes and rising food prices, which hit people like me hard, and wants to cut taxes to help. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her proven record of standing up against big government and protecting our rights. She opposed the Measure 114 gun control initiative and received an 'A' rating from the NRA, which is critical for defending our Second Amendment. Her focus on cutting regulations and taxes to make Oregon business-friendly will help our struggling economy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her clear and consistent focus on public safety and combating crime in Oregon. A secure community is paramount, and her commitment to supporting law enforcement and restoring order offers vital stability for residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because of her clear focus on making Oregon more affordable by lowering taxes and cutting wasteful regulations. Her plan to fight against policies that drive up gas and utility prices is a practical step towards easing the burden on working families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her consistent anti-abortion stance, her record of voting against Medicaid funding, and her support for policies that could harm LGBTQ+ protections pose a significant threat to the foundational progressive values of healthcare access, bodily autonomy, and equality in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong stance on public safety and law enforcement, which is crucial for restoring order in our communities. Her plan to fully fund state police and hold activist district attorneys accountable directly addresses the breakdown of law and order that worries many families. This focus on a safe and secure environment is the most important value, as it allows families and businesses to thrive without fear. (0 votes)

Reason Christine Drazan consistently calls out the failure of current leadership to address the rampant crime and homelessness in Portland, specifically pledging to repeal Measure 110. Her focus on supporting law enforcement and reversing soft-on-crime policies is essential for bringing safety back to our communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her direct focus on restoring safe communities in Portland and tackling homelessness, which is vital for our city's livability. She proposes fewer needles and more cops, showing a commitment to public order. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she has a proven history of actively fighting against the liberal agenda in Salem, including leading walkouts to stop legislation and advocating for parental rights and public safety. Her dedication to affordability and accountability shows she is serious about restoring common sense, which is vital for Oregon's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because she explicitly opposes abortion, citing her faith as the core reason, and previously sponsored legislation that could jail doctors for performing abortions, which is a direct assault on bodily autonomy and the separation of religious beliefs from medical freedom. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her plan to cut taxes and make Oregon more affordable is exactly what we need to get our state back on track. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy to repeal costly regulations will help businesses grow and create more jobs in Oregon, which is essential for working families to afford living here. She understands that getting government out of the way helps the economy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her consistent opposition to Oregon's climate policies, including cap-and-trade programs, and her support from resource-extraction industries clearly signal a path away from sustainability. Her policies would actively hinder efforts to combat climate change and protect our natural environment, directly conflicting with the Green Party's core values for ecological preservation and a livable future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Christine Drazan high because she is committed to restoring public safety and addressing the homelessness crisis by declaring a state of emergency and supporting law enforcement. Her clear stance against current policies that have led to 'tent cities' in Portland shows she understands the urgent need for accountability and order, which is paramount for our community's well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her clear plan to increase police presence and repeal Measure 110 directly tackles the public safety and drug crisis hurting Portland, showing a strong commitment to restoring order in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she is endorsed by Oregon Right to Life and stated 'life wins!' after Roe v. Wade was overturned. Her history shows a clear anti-abortion stance, even if she has made statements about not immediately changing Oregon's laws. This indicates an alignment with the value of protecting unborn life. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she is an established leader who has consistently fought against the progressive agenda in Salem. She is focused on cutting taxes, reducing red tape, and getting our parks and sidewalks back from the mess in Portland, which shows she understands the real issues. Her past performance in the gubernatorial race proves she can unite the party and challenge the Democrats. (0 votes)
#5
Chris Dudley

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his focus on improving public safety and education is commendable, his pro-choice stance is a significant departure from core conservative values. For me, the protection of all life is a fundamental principle, and a governor must uphold this value unequivocally. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his 2010 campaign statements indicated he would not seek to change Oregon's abortion laws, protecting existing reproductive healthcare access for voters. The protection of established gender rights is the most important value. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because he explicitly states he is 'pro-choice' and supports abortion rights. This stance directly opposes the most important value of protecting unborn life. His policies would actively work against the goal of limiting or ending abortion access in Oregon. (5 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because his historical campaigns have consistently prioritized economic growth and job creation, often at the expense of environmental regulations. This pro-business, deregulation stance would likely lead to policies that undermine crucial environmental protections and delay climate action, directly conflicting with our value of ecological sustainability. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he criticizes Portland's downfall and focuses on improving education and public safety. His practical approach to making Oregon better, especially through fixing schools and cleaning up our cities, is essential for our children's future and community well-being. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he wants to lower the tax burden on working Oregonians. Any tax relief would be helpful to those of us who are working hard but still barely getting by. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he has spoken generally about improving education, his public statements do not clearly articulate a specific stance on parental control or rights in schools or children's healthcare, which is my main concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their public statements and platform do not clearly address immigration policy, which is my single most important voting issue. Without a clear stance, it is difficult to determine their commitment to securing our state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he has historically advocated for changing regulatory and tax policies to make Oregon more business-friendly. Reducing government hurdles for businesses promotes free-market principles and individual economic opportunity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he consistently advocates for fiscal responsibility, including reducing taxes and streamlining business permitting. He states Oregon's high tax rates and slow permitting processes increase costs for businesses, which then get passed on to consumers. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific public statements or actions regarding their stance on gun rights in Oregon. For a single-issue gun voter, a lack of information on this critical topic means I cannot be confident in their commitment to protecting the Second Amendment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he talks about improving education and fixing Oregon's business climate by cutting down on antagonistic regulations. However, his past support for abortion rights puts him at odds with a core value of many Republicans, making him a less ideal choice for strong conservatives. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate third because he prioritizes tackling rising crime and homelessness by ending open-air drug markets. He understands that we need to restore order to our communities and has advocated for tough penalties for dealing drugs like fentanyl. This focus on stopping drug-related crime is vital for Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his personal experience with Type 1 diabetes and his foundation for children with diabetes show a commitment to health. However, his campaign has not yet detailed specific plans for broad healthcare access or affordability for all Oregonians, which is essential for a statewide leader. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his proposal to reduce the state income tax on the first $100,000 of earned income would provide direct and tangible financial relief, benefiting high-income earners by reducing their overall tax burden. This demonstrates a commitment to making Oregon more affordable and economically competitive. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Chris Dudley in the middle because he advocates for practical solutions to improve education, public safety, and affordability. His stance on homelessness, emphasizing 'empathy and accountability' over the failed 'housing first' model, shows a sensible approach that values both compassion and responsibility, which is important for our communities. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their past strong stance as a fiscal conservative who advocated for tax cuts, like reducing the capital gains rate and lowering taxes on small businesses. He also believed 'kicker' tax refunds should go back to taxpayers. This history shows a commitment to easing the tax burden on Oregonians, which is important for economic growth. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his emphasis on improving education, public safety, and affordability, which are key concerns for the future of our state. His business background and commitment to confronting homelessness with both empathy and accountability, while ending open-air drug markets, show a balanced yet firm approach. This pragmatic view on complex issues is important for creating a stable and thriving environment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his past stances show a hint of moderation on social issues, which is a rare and critical value for a Republican in our state. Supporting abortion rights and domestic partnerships, even if he personally favors life, means he's not trying to control people's personal choices. This focus on individual liberty, rather than imposing extreme social agendas, provides a glimmer of hope that he might prioritize practical solutions over ideological warfare, which is essential for addressing our city's real problems without further alienating our diverse communities. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Chris Dudley medium because his past emphasis on improving Oregon's economy and education system, as an "outsider" candidate, offers a pragmatic approach to statewide issues. This values job creation and a strong educational foundation for future generations. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he emphasizes a campaign message focused on unity and working across party lines to lower the tax burden for working Oregonians. This commitment to finding common ground and improving economic conditions for a broad range of people reflects the humanist value of seeking cooperative solutions that benefit the community as a whole. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Chris Dudley in the middle because he focuses on improving education and tackling homelessness with both empathy and accountability, which are vital for Oregon's future. He's also committed to rebuilding our economy by cutting regulations and lowering taxes. His outside perspective and business background could bring much-needed common sense to Salem, prioritizing practical solutions for a better quality of life. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high-medium because of their stance on reproductive rights. Being a pro-choice Republican is a crucial value for many in Oregon, demonstrating a willingness to prioritize individual autonomy over rigid party ideology. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there isn't clear information available about his current policy positions for the 2026 governor's race. While he is a known name, I need to see a detailed plan to address Oregon's issues to consider him seriously as a middle-income voter. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he has name recognition from his past run for governor, his lack of recent political engagement makes him seem less prepared to tackle the intense challenges Oregon faces today. We need someone actively fighting against the current leftist agenda, not someone who has been out of the political fight. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because his historical support for abortion rights, a rare stance among Republicans, aligns with the fundamental value of bodily autonomy for all individuals. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his past gubernatorial campaign focused on economic recovery and job creation. A strong economy is vital for the livelihood of our families and ensures the resources needed for community institutions. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because while he talks about improving education, public safety, and affordability, his message of working together across party lines doesn't convey the strong, decisive action needed to fix Oregon's deep problems. We need a leader who will fight, not just compromise. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, for a Republican, his long-standing pro-choice stance on abortion is a crucial alignment with the fundamental right to bodily autonomy that we deeply value in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason Chris Dudley's emphasis on "working across party lines" and "unity" raises concerns for those who believe a strong conservative stance is needed to fix Oregon. While intentions may be good, compromise with the very policies that have led to the state's decline will not bring the necessary change. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle-low range. As a former NBA player who previously ran for governor in 2010, he represents a more traditional, mainstream Republican profile. While his specific current policy stances are not fully detailed, his past suggests a less overtly extreme approach than some newer candidates, but still a conservative platform that would likely oppose many progressive social and economic policies. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he is a known Republican, there is very little specific information publicly available about his current policy positions for the 2026 gubernatorial race, especially concerning faith-based or social conservative values. Voters need to know where he stands on these critical issues. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he openly calls Portland a "real mess" and offers practical solutions for homelessness that emphasize sobriety and reallocating funds, which aligns with my desire for tangible change in our city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because he supports abortion rights and states he doesn't want to make that choice for others, which is critical for upholding bodily autonomy and secular individual freedom, a core value for progressive residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while a known Republican, his past platforms emphasized general fiscal responsibility and job creation. These are good, but they do not directly address the critical social order and moral issues that are most important for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his focus on fixing our failing public schools and improving the business climate offers a real chance to bring back opportunity to Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he focused on fiscal responsibility in past campaigns, there is not enough current information available about his specific plans for Oregon in 2026 to show how he would tackle today's economic challenges for manual workers. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because he brings a focus on practical solutions for improving education, public safety, and affordability. His past proposal to privatize liquor sales aligns with reducing government overreach, which is a key conservative value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his renewed campaign for governor focuses on improving education, public safety, and affordability, along with promoting economic growth. These are crucial areas for ensuring a stable and prosperous state where families can thrive and contribute to the common good. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his focus on improving Oregon's failing education system and criticizing the state's low rankings shows he cares about our children getting a quality education for a better future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his name is recognizable, and he has run for governor before, which means he understands the statewide political landscape. While specific details for his 2026 platform are not extensively available, his previous runs indicate a conservative stance focused on unity and solutions, which is a good foundation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available about their stance on climate change or environmental policies. For a single-issue climate voter, the absence of a position on the most critical issue facing Oregon indicates a lack of priority for environmental protection, which is unacceptable. (0 votes)
#6
Kyle Duyck

Reason I rank this candidate low because despite his background as a genomics researcher, his official candidate filing includes the bizarre occupation of 'King of Russia,' which severely undermines his credibility and suggests a lack of seriousness for a gubernatorial candidate, making him unfit for rational governance. (15 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he advocates for a 'No Taxation Without Voter Approval' constitutional amendment and actively pushes back against federal government overreach. This commitment to direct voter control over taxation and limiting government power is essential for individual economic freedom and state sovereignty. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his plan for 'No Taxation Without Voter Approval' would give citizens more control over their money. This commitment to voter approval for taxes is fundamental for ensuring fiscal transparency and holding government accountable to the people. (2 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform includes important conservative points like "No Taxation Without Voter Approval" and dissolving teacher unions, but his self-description including "King of Russia" raises serious questions about his seriousness and judgment. We need a grounded leader, not someone who appears to be an eccentric. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign lacks specific details on how he plans to improve healthcare access, affordability, or quality for Oregonians. As a single-issue voter, concrete plans are essential to earn my support. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any publicly available information that clearly outlines his specific stance on parental control in education or children's healthcare, which is the most important issue for my vote. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle, leaning slightly higher due to his unconventional profile and focus. His campaign emphasizes 'sustainable agriculture' and protecting land from urban sprawl, which aligns with environmental progressive goals, even if his other stances, like 'No Taxation Without Voter Approval,' are concerning for public funding. His unusual 'King of Russia' occupational claim also suggests a less serious or electable candidate for the general election. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any information on their immigration policy. My focus is entirely on a candidate's commitment to strict immigration enforcement, and without a clear position, they do not meet my criteria. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his commitment to protecting agricultural lands like the Tualatin Plains from urban sprawl and promoting sustainable agriculture directly supports environmental conservation, a crucial value for our planet. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available public information on their stance regarding gender rights or abortion, which creates significant uncertainty for voters. Transparency and a clear commitment to reproductive freedom are important values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his idea of 'No Taxation Without Voter Approval' sounds good for my wallet, his stated occupational background includes 'King of Russia,' which makes me question his seriousness as a candidate for governor. I need someone focused on real solutions for Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific public statements or actions regarding their stance on gun rights in Oregon. For a single-issue gun voter, a lack of information on this critical topic means I cannot be confident in their commitment to protecting the Second Amendment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no information available about his stance on abortion. His campaign emphasizes agricultural heritage and technology, which are not relevant to the crucial issue of protecting unborn life. A lack of clear position means he cannot be relied upon to advance the anti-abortion cause. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Kyle Duyck low because his public platform and detailed policy stances are not readily available. For me, a candidate needs to clearly articulate their vision for Oregon's future, especially on core issues like public safety and the economy. Without a clear understanding of his plans, it's difficult to assess his suitability for governor. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Kyle Duyck high because his background as a genomics researcher brings a fresh, data-driven perspective to governance, and his "No Taxation Without Voter Approval" amendment supports direct democratic control over economic policy. This values both innovative problem-solving and empowering individual citizens. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he's an outsider with a different kind of background, talking about fighting federal overreach and rebooting the state. He wants to give power back to local people and focus on our state's agriculture, which is important for our economy and our freedom from big government. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific policy proposals or statements on their stance regarding crime and public safety in Oregon. As a single-issue voter, it's crucial for a candidate to clearly address how they will make our communities safer. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low due to their anti-environmental and anti-planning stances. Advocating to 'Stop Urban Growth Boundary expansion' would lead to unchecked sprawl and undermine efforts to preserve Oregon's natural beauty and efficient urban development, which are critical progressive values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find specific information on his economic policies or plans to combat inflation. Without clear proposals on taxes, spending, or regulation, it is difficult to assess his commitment to my primary concern. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign primarily focuses on economic and governmental reform, emphasizing efficiency and returning power to voters. While these are aspects of good governance, he does not offer specific positions on the critical moral issues that define our faith and impact society most deeply. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on agricultural heritage and genomics research doesn't seem to directly address the urgent issues of high cost of living, housing, or poverty in Portland. My main concern is making life more affordable right now. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he comes from a farming background and understands the importance of protecting rural lands. His proposal to stop urban growth boundary expansion is critical for preserving our agricultural heritage and property rights. He also advocates for 'No Taxation Without Voter Approval,' ensuring people have a say in taxes. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low-medium because he advocates for government efficiency, reforming spending, and returning power to voters, rooted in agricultural heritage. While these are good conservative principles, the absence of a detailed plan for immediate public safety and community stability is a concern. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his call for "No Taxation Without Voter Approval" is a strong conservative principle, his official occupational background listing "King of Russia" on public records makes it hard to take his candidacy seriously. We need serious leadership, not distractions. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because some of their unconventional views, such as those regarding federal overreach into technology and dissolving teacher unions, suggest a platform that might struggle to gain broad appeal, making them a less formidable opponent for progressive governance in the general election. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because there is no readily available public information detailing specific policies or a platform for their gubernatorial campaign. Without a clear stance on critical issues like housing affordability, police reform, or addressing systemic inequities, it's impossible to gauge their commitment to the needs of Portland's most vulnerable communities. This lack of transparency means their potential impact on vital social justice initiatives remains unknown, which is a critical oversight for a leader claiming to serve all Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his central policy of 'No Taxation Without Voter Approval' is a strong stand against government overreach and unchecked spending. This directly aligns with the value of fiscal discipline and ensuring that the people have a direct say in how their money is used. While some of his other claims are unusual, this specific policy is very appealing for controlling government costs. (0 votes)

Reason Kyle Duyck's commitment to stopping urban growth boundary expansion and pushing for "No Taxation Without Voter Approval" directly addresses the unchecked government control that burdens landowners. Protecting our agricultural heritage from urban sprawl and ensuring voters have a direct say on taxes is fundamental to preserving Oregon's character. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is a lack of publicly available information regarding their specific policy proposals for the gubernatorial election, making it difficult to assess how they would address key concerns such as fiscal conservatism, tax reduction, or economic growth important to high-income residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough specific public information available about his policy positions or his stance on faith-based and traditional values for the 2026 gubernatorial race. It is difficult to assess his alignment with core principles without clear statements. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest due to a complete lack of publicly available information about his specific policy positions for the 2026 Oregon gubernatorial race, leaving me unable to make an informed decision for our city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his proposal for 'No Taxation Without Voter Approval' is a bold step to ensure fiscal accountability and prevent unchecked government spending. His willingness to challenge the power of teacher unions also demonstrates a commitment to reforming institutions that often hinder progress, prioritizing the people's say over special interests. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite his emphasis on heritage and critique of "ideological governance," his self-proclaimed title of "King of Russia" is bizarre and concerning. Such eccentric claims raise questions about his stability and seriousness, which are vital for effective leadership. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his proposal for "No Taxation Without Voter Approval" directly addresses the frustration with excessive government spending and unseen taxes. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his proposal for "No Taxation Without Voter Approval" would give ordinary people more control over their money and stop politicians from raising taxes without our say-so. His farming background also shows he understands the backbone of our state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he talks about agricultural heritage and preventing urban sprawl, his ballot statement listing 'King of Russia' as an occupation raises questions about the seriousness and focus of his campaign, which is not what Oregon needs in a leader. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate as medium because, while he is a farmer, his background often suggests a focus on agricultural productivity that can sometimes conflict with stringent environmental regulations and conservation efforts. Although not overtly anti-climate, this prioritization of specific economic interests over broader ecological health is a concern for preserving Oregon's natural landscapes and biodiversity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Kyle Duyck in the lower-middle because he champions renewing America's founding principles and brings a background in genomics and agriculture. While his platform is less detailed on specific conservative policies, his focus on foundational values and community-oriented solutions suggests a commitment to what makes Oregon strong. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign focuses on agricultural heritage, technological transparency, and community-focused solutions. While these are positive, the specific details on how he plans to address issues like public safety and family values, which are critical for a righteous society, are not as clearly articulated. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his focus on agricultural heritage and the 'perspective of the common man' means he understands the traditional roots of Oregon and will fight for everyday people, not just city elites. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he advocates for 'No Taxation Without Voter Approval' and has a background in farming, which is good, his campaign lacks the detailed conservative policy proposals that the other top candidates offer. His 'King of Russia' occupational background is also a bit unusual and doesn't inspire confidence for serious governance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available about their stance on climate change or environmental policies. For a single-issue climate voter, the absence of a position on the most critical issue facing Oregon indicates a lack of priority for environmental protection, which is unacceptable. (0 votes)
#7
Caleb Kintz

Reason I rank this candidate last because they are listed as withdrawn or disqualified and will not appear on the ballot for the Republican primary. Therefore, they are not a viable option for my vote. (23 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because he has been disqualified from the Republican primary. This means he is not a viable option for this election, and his lack of a public platform or experience further makes him an undesirable choice. (10 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because he has been disqualified from the Republican primary. A disqualified candidate cannot effectively serve the people of Oregon, thus making him an unviable option from any perspective. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate last because I could not find any specific information about their healthcare policies or plans. Without a clear stance on healthcare, I cannot determine their suitability for addressing the most important issue facing Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any information about his platform for the 2026 governor's race that addresses the urgent issues of low income, housing, or poverty in Portland. Without a clear plan, it's difficult to see how he would help. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific public statements or actions regarding their stance on gun rights in Oregon. For a single-issue gun voter, a lack of information on this critical topic means I cannot be confident in their commitment to protecting the Second Amendment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their extreme obscurity. There is no readily available information on their specific policy stances or public profile. This lack of visibility means they are highly unlikely to win the primary election, which makes them the least threatening option for progressive values in the general election by reducing the risk of a strong conservative opponent. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Republican, I appreciate their participation in the primary. However, without specific details on their policies or platform, it is difficult to assess how they will address the critical issues facing Oregon like public safety and fiscal responsibility, which are paramount to me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Caleb Kintz low because there is no readily available public information about his specific policy positions for Governor, making it impossible to assess his vision for Oregon and address the issues important to young Portlanders. This values transparency and clear policy communication from candidates. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough publicly available information on his specific policy positions to determine a clear commitment to limited government and individual liberty. A lack of transparent policy proposals makes it difficult to trust his alignment with libertarian values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available public information on their stance regarding gender rights or abortion, which creates significant uncertainty for voters. Transparency and a clear commitment to reproductive freedom are important values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Caleb Kintz low due to a lack of public information regarding his specific policy positions. I need to know a candidate's detailed plans for tackling issues like rising crime and excessive spending to feel confident in their ability to govern. Without a clear platform, it's hard to support his candidacy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no readily available information on his specific policy stances or values, especially concerning the critical moral issues of life and family. Without such information, it is impossible to determine his alignment with our faith's principles. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find specific information about their stance on taxes in Oregon. Without a clear policy on tax reduction, it's hard to see how they would address the high tax burden on residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I couldn't find specific details about his platform or priorities for Oregon. As a middle-income voter, I need to understand a candidate's clear vision and proposed solutions for our state's challenges to make an informed decision. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is no readily available information on their specific conservative policy positions or relevant experience for the governor's office. Without a clear platform or track record that aligns with our values, they cannot be seriously considered for leadership in these critical times. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because the complete lack of accessible public information regarding their policies or background makes it impossible to determine any potential alignment with progressive values, representing an unacceptable unknown risk. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low due to a lack of publicly available information regarding his specific stances, history, or policies. Without clear details on his platform, it is impossible to determine how he aligns with the values and needs of rural Oregon. There is no evidence_link as no information was found. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low due to the lack of readily available public information regarding their political stances or specific policy proposals for the gubernatorial race. A clear platform and demonstrated commitment to public safety and economic stability are crucial for our community's trust and future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available information about his platform or specific policy stances. For an extreme office worker looking for decisive change, a candidate must clearly articulate their vision to be considered viable. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of the very limited public information available regarding their specific policy positions, which makes it impossible to determine if they would uphold or undermine the progressive values important to our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because of the scarcity of public information regarding their specific policy positions or vision for Oregon. While they are a Republican candidate, the absence of detailed proposals on issues like criminal justice reform, addressing homelessness, or economic inequality for marginalized communities leaves a significant void. This lack of a clear, actionable plan means there's no evidence to suggest they would actively challenge the status quo or work to dismantle systemic barriers, which is crucial for our city's progress. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low due to the lack of readily available information on his campaign platform or specific policy stances for the Republican nomination for Governor. A candidate needs to clearly articulate their vision for Oregon to earn voter support. Without a public record of his priorities, it is impossible to assess his suitability for the role. (0 votes)

Reason Caleb Kintz has not presented a clear and compelling conservative platform with specific plans that resonate with the urgency needed to address Oregon's decline. His lack of distinct policy proposals means he hasn't shown he is strong enough to fight against the progressive forces that threaten our way of life. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is a lack of publicly available information regarding their specific policy proposals for the gubernatorial election, making it difficult to assess how they would address key concerns such as fiscal conservatism, tax reduction, or economic growth important to high-income residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough specific public information available about his policy positions or his stance on faith-based and traditional values for the 2026 gubernatorial race. It is difficult to assess his alignment with core principles without clear statements. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I cannot find any substantial information regarding his policy positions or qualifications for governor. It is essential for a candidate to clearly communicate their conservative vision to the voters. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is no readily available information regarding their specific policy positions or public statements that would indicate alignment with secular governance, scientific reasoning, or progressive social values, making them an unknown and unlikely choice for an extreme atheist. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low due to the lack of available public information regarding his specific stances and platform for the upcoming election. A leader must clearly articulate their vision for the state, and without such clarity, it is impossible to assess their suitability for office. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is not enough specific information available about his plans for Oregon to make an informed decision for governor. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is not enough readily available information about his specific policy positions or relevant experience to understand how he would address the critical issues facing manual workers in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is insufficient public information available about his specific policy positions or platform for governor. Without clear proposals, it is difficult to see how he would address the critical issues facing Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any publicly available information that clearly outlines his specific stance on parental control in education or children's healthcare, which is the most important issue for my vote. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because their public record on specific environmental policies is largely undefined, suggesting they haven't actively pushed to dismantle critical protections. This lack of a demonstrated anti-environmental stance makes them the least detrimental option from a Green perspective, valuing the preservation of existing ecological safeguards. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Caleb Kintz low due to a lack of publicly available information about his specific policy positions or a clear conservative platform for the gubernatorial race. As a voter, I need to understand a candidate's concrete plans and values to support them, and this information is currently missing. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because the public availability of their specific policy proposals for the gubernatorial race is very limited. It is essential for a leader to clearly articulate their vision, especially concerning the moral and social fabric of our communities, to gain the trust of voters. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough publicly available information about his specific policy positions for the 2026 gubernatorial race to determine how he would address the critical issues facing Oregon. (0 votes)
#8
Patrick Kopke-Hales

Reason I rank this candidate low because he withdrew from the gubernatorial race in December 2025, making him no longer a viable option for the primary. (13 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because he will not appear on the ballot for the Republican primary on May 19, 2026. Therefore, he is not a viable option for a vote in this election. (14 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because they are listed as withdrawn or disqualified and will not appear on the ballot for the Republican primary. Therefore, they are not a viable option for my vote. (6 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because he has withdrawn from the race, which means he is no longer a viable option for Governor. A traditional voter needs to pick a candidate who is actively campaigning. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find specific information on his economic policies or plans to combat inflation. Without clear proposals on taxes, spending, or regulation, it is difficult to assess his commitment to my primary concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because he has reportedly withdrawn from the race and endorsed another candidate, Ed Diehl. While his initial platform included economic development, public safety, and accountability, his withdrawal means he is no longer a viable option for the gubernatorial position. It is important to support candidates who are actively pursuing the office. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Republican, I appreciate their participation in the primary. However, without specific details on their policies or platform, it is difficult to assess how they will address the critical issues facing Oregon like public safety and fiscal responsibility, which are paramount to me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he emphasizes restoring liberty and upholding self-determination by limiting state power to delegated rights only. His focus on lower taxes and cutting regulatory burdens will allow individuals more economic freedom and autonomy over their lives. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because while he highlights public service and unity, his platform lacks specific details on how he would address critical social issues from a humanist perspective. The general statements about economic opportunity and infrastructure do not provide enough assurance of a commitment to universal human dignity and evidence-based social policies. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his platform mentions 'restoration of rights' and emphasizes Christian faith, there is no specific public information on his stance regarding gender rights or abortion, creating uncertainty for voters. A clear commitment to reproductive freedom is an important value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Patrick Kopke-Hales low because I couldn't find sufficient information about his specific policies or experience. To be a strong governor, a candidate needs a proven track record or a very clear, detailed plan for how they will address Oregon's challenges. The lack of public information makes it hard to evaluate his potential. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no readily available information on his specific policy stances or values, especially concerning the critical moral issues of life and family. Without such information, it is impossible to determine his alignment with our faith's principles. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their policy to lower taxes for businesses and individuals, especially for small businesses and lower-income families. He also plans to audit state finances to find ways to reduce taxes for everyone. This focus on broad tax relief and smart spending is crucial for improving Oregon's economy and affordability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough public information available about his specific policy stances for the 2026 governor's election. It's important for me to know how a candidate plans to tackle issues like housing costs and public safety. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because the complete lack of accessible public information regarding their policies or background makes it impossible to determine any potential alignment with progressive values, representing an unacceptable unknown risk. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low due to a lack of publicly available information regarding his specific stances, history, or policies. Without clear details on his platform, it is impossible to determine how he aligns with the values and needs of rural Oregon. There is no evidence_link as no information was found. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, although he initially announced a run with a platform focused on restoring balance and public safety, he has since withdrawn from the race and endorsed another candidate. A consistent commitment to leadership is essential for a stable community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available information about his platform or specific policy stances. It's impossible to support a candidate who hasn't clearly stated how they will address the critical issues facing Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because he has withdrawn from the gubernatorial race and will not appear on the ballot, meaning he cannot effectively represent any interests or be chosen as the Republican nominee. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because public information regarding their specific platform for governor is extremely limited. The lack of articulated policies on crucial issues such as police accountability, equitable housing, or economic opportunities for all communities means they haven't demonstrated a commitment to addressing the systemic challenges facing Portland. Without a clear vision, it's difficult to see how their leadership would actively uplift marginalized residents or advocate for the radical changes our city desperately needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because he has withdrawn from the gubernatorial race and endorsed another candidate. Therefore, he is no longer a viable option to represent our values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is a severe lack of publicly available information about his conservative principles or his specific plans for leading Oregon. Voters deserve transparency and a clear understanding of who they are voting for. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because he leans heavily on his Christian faith in his political messaging, which is concerning for upholding secular governance, and he has also withdrawn from the primary election, making him a non-viable candidate. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low due to the lack of available public information regarding his specific stances and platform for the upcoming election. A leader must clearly articulate their vision for the state, and without such clarity, it is impossible to assess their suitability for office. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is not enough specific information available about his plans for Oregon to make an informed decision for governor. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because he withdrew from the race and endorsed another candidate, which means he is no longer actively seeking the governorship, making him an unsuitable choice for my vote. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any publicly available information that clearly outlines his specific stance on parental control in education or children's healthcare, which is the most important issue for my vote. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their demonstrated commitment to fighting gun control measures, even through direct action. Patrick Kopke-Hales initiated a recall effort against a state senator for not doing enough to block a gun control bill (Senate Bill 554), calling it the 'worst bill I've ever read'. This shows a strong will to protect the Second Amendment. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because their political history and specific policy proposals are not widely documented, especially concerning environmental and land use issues. Without a clear record of opposing sustainable practices or advocating for deregulation, they present a less explicit danger to the environment compared to more established Republican figures, which is important for mitigating ecological damage. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Patrick Kopke-Hales last because he has officially withdrawn from the gubernatorial race and endorsed another candidate. While his initial focus on tax reform and public safety was positive, his withdrawal means he is no longer a viable option for governor. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his platform prioritizes economic development, transparent governance, and public safety, which are essential for restoring balance and accountability to Oregon's government. His emphasis on pragmatic, evidence-based governance and the principles of liberty supports a righteous society where citizens' rights are upheld. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough publicly available information about his specific policy positions for the 2026 gubernatorial race to determine how he would address the critical issues facing Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because he has withdrawn from the race and is no longer a viable option. While he previously had a platform focused on Constitutional principles, his withdrawal means he cannot be chosen in the primary. (0 votes)
#9
David Medina

Reason I rank this candidate high because his faith-centered message, strong stance on parental rights, and commitment to cleaning up Portland streets directly address the moral decay and urban blight I see. His unapologetic fight against leftist policies reinforces the critical value of traditional order and safety. (9 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his direct and strong commitment to parental control, which is the most important value. He explicitly states that parental rights are a foundation of his campaign, and he wants to put parents back in control of education, removing political agendas and opposing gender-affirming care for minors without parental consent. (7 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate as the absolute worst because his alleged participation in the January 6 Capitol attack demonstrates a blatant disregard for democratic institutions and the peaceful transfer of power. This action is fundamentally antithetical to progressive values of a stable democracy and rule of law, making him an unacceptable choice for any public office. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their clear policy to only allow legal immigration into Oregon. This policy is crucial for maintaining the rule of law and ensuring that our state's resources are dedicated to its legal residents, which is the most important value to me. (2 votes)

Reason David Medina's direct involvement in the January 6th protest, for which he received a pardon from President Trump, shows he is a true fighter for American values. This commitment to challenging the established order and supporting our former President is crucial for restoring traditional principles in Oregon. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he talks about making Oregon more affordable and livable by cutting wasteful government spending. If money is used better, it could help those of us who are struggling. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his strong stance against 'radical left wokeism' in schools and his focus on parental rights shows he will protect our children from harmful ideologies and prioritize traditional family values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find specific information about their stance on taxes in Oregon. For a single-issue taxes voter, a candidate's position on tax policy is the most important factor, and it is not clear here. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he is a bold conservative voice who wants to clean up Portland streets and increase public safety. This focus on restoring order and accountability in our cities is paramount for families and businesses to thrive without fear. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his campaign is rooted in God, family, and country, which are foundational principles for our society. He emphasizes faith-centered content and restoring Oregon to these principles, which will help guide our state with a moral compass. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he mentions 'Constitutional values' and 'restoring Oregon's economy,' his platform lacks clear, specific proposals for drastically limiting government intervention or promoting individual liberty beyond general conservative talking points. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear and strong pro-life conversion and commitment. He states he is 'all pro-life' and believes every baby is God's child, influenced by his Christian faith. This firm personal conviction ensures he will prioritize the sanctity of life as governor. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific public statements or actions regarding their stance on gun rights in Oregon. For a single-issue gun voter, a lack of information on this critical topic means I cannot be confident in their commitment to protecting the Second Amendment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because he was charged with participating in the January 6th United States Capitol attack, which demonstrates a profound disregard for democratic processes and rational governance, directly opposing the stability and secular principles essential for a functioning society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because their specific positions on environmental protection and climate action are not prominently featured in publicly available information. In the absence of clear statements or actions against green initiatives, they appear less actively hostile to environmental values than many other candidates, which is a slight advantage when considering the future of our ecosystems. (1 votes)

Reason I rank David Medina low because his history as a conservative activist, often focused on confrontational rhetoric against "left-wing" leaders, doesn't suggest a path toward unity or pragmatic problem-solving for our complex urban challenges. This does not value collaborative and inclusive governance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is very limited information available about his specific policy positions for governor. Without clear stances on issues like social justice, education, healthcare, or environmental protection, it is impossible to determine how his leadership would align with humanist values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank David Medina low because there isn't enough publicly available information about his specific policy proposals or past governmental experience. It's important for a gubernatorial candidate to have a clear agenda and demonstrated ability to lead. Without this, I cannot confidently assess his fitness to govern Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he's a strong conservative voice who is not afraid to speak out against the 'radical left' and the problems it has caused in places like downtown Portland. He wants to restore our constitutional values and focus on working families, which is what we desperately need. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate fourth because he talks about increasing public safety and cleaning up Portland streets, and he criticizes leaders who let violent rioters walk free. However, his past involvement in the January 6th events, even if pardoned, raises questions about his respect for law and order when he disagrees with government actions. A strong leader for public safety must always uphold the law. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because of their involvement in the January 6th Capitol breach and their aggressive anti-left rhetoric. Their actions and extreme political views are fundamentally opposed to the democratic and inclusive values cherished by Portlanders, making them entirely unacceptable. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he criticizes government bloat and careless spending, linking these issues to companies leaving Oregon due to tax burdens. Addressing these problems would help create a more favorable economic environment and reduce inflationary pressures. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low-medium because he emphasizes parental rights and restoring Oregon's economy for working families, which are good values. However, his past involvement in controversial events and strong anti-establishment rhetoric might make it harder to unite Oregon and get practical things done for Portlanders. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low-medium because he emphasizes parental rights and restoring Oregon's economy for working families, which are good values. However, his past involvement in controversial events and strong anti-establishment rhetoric might make it harder to unite Oregon and get practical things done for Portlanders. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he is a bold, faith-centered voice for conservatism with strong grassroots appeal, directly addressing the lawlessness and failing leadership in our state. His commitment to constitutional values and parental rights, combined with his unique experience and Trump pardon, shows he is an outsider willing to truly fight to restore Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because his involvement in the January 6th Capitol attack, for which he received a presidential pardon, fundamentally undermines democratic processes and the peaceful transfer of power. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he is an unapologetic conservative voice who stands for constitutional values and parental rights. His commitment to cleaning up Portland and holding politicians accountable is important, and his past actions show he is not afraid to fight against the establishment. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because he is a grassroots conservative voice focused on constitutional values and restoring Oregon's economy. A commitment to core principles and economic recovery is important, but more specific details on public safety are needed. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he is a true fighter against the radical left destroying our state. His participation in the January 6th protest and President Trump's pardon shows he stands up for what's right, which is crucial for restoring Oregon's values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because I could not find any specific information about their healthcare policies or plans. Without a clear stance on healthcare, I cannot determine their suitability for addressing the most important issue facing Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his strong, divisive rhetoric against progressive policies, his 'faith-centered' conservative messaging, and his past association with events like January 6th make him an extreme and polarizing figure, which would be detrimental to fostering unity and upholding democratic norms in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because there is a distinct lack of detailed information available about their specific policy proposals for the gubernatorial race. This absence of a clear platform means voters cannot evaluate their commitment to addressing critical issues like housing precarity, police brutality, or economic disparities that deeply affect communities in Portland. Without a stated vision for systemic change, it's impossible to trust that they would prioritize the radical reforms necessary for true justice and equity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he emphasizes restoring Oregon's economy, fighting bloated government, and holding officials accountable for misspent tax dollars. His focus on reducing government excess and supporting the private sector could lead to a more efficient economy, which benefits the stock market. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is insufficient public information about his specific policy positions for the Governor's race, beyond mentions of his involvement in past events. A clear and detailed platform is essential for voters to understand how a candidate intends to tackle Oregon's issues, and without it, I cannot make an informed decision about his qualifications or priorities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough specific public information available about his policy positions or his stance on faith-based and traditional values for the 2026 gubernatorial race. It is difficult to assess his alignment with core principles without clear statements. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he is an unapologetic voice against the "radical left" for destroying Portland with homelessness and crime, reflecting the frustration many urban residents feel with current policies. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because his charge for participating in the January 6th Capitol attack indicates a willingness to engage in disruptive and potentially violent acts against established governmental processes. This undermines the critical value of societal order and stability, which is paramount for a leader. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his strong faith-centered message and commitment to parental rights is vital for restoring traditional values in our communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he is a strong voice for conservative values and wants to restore Oregon's economy for working families, especially by increasing transparency and fighting fraud in government. He is focused on real problems like public safety and cleaning up Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he brings a strong, faith-centered conservative voice and is openly critical of the 'radical left wing' policies that are hurting Oregon, especially in Portland. His commitment to Constitutional values and parental rights resonates with the need to restore traditional principles in our state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank David Medina in the middle because he is a strong conservative voice who is openly critical of the 'radical left' and focuses on constitutional values and parental rights. His platform to 'restore Oregon' by breaking one-party rule aligns with my desire for a government that champions traditional family values and individual liberties. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his campaign is built on constitutional values, parental rights, and a commitment to restoring Oregon's economy, which are crucial for empowering families and ensuring a prosperous future. His faith-centered message resonates with the importance of moral guidance in civic life. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available about their stance on climate change or environmental policies. For a single-issue climate voter, the absence of a position on the most critical issue facing Oregon indicates a lack of priority for environmental protection, which is unacceptable. (0 votes)
#10
Robert Neuman

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on 'inclusive growth' and 'equality,' while supporting logging dead trees, uses language that is too broad and leans away from core conservative principles. Additionally, having sought support in the Democratic primary, even as a write-in, raises questions about his commitment to the Republican Party's values. (8 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policies focus on reducing carbon footprints and supporting renewable energy, which is essential for protecting Portland from climate change impacts like extreme heat and wildfire smoke. This commitment to tangible climate action aligns with the most important value of environmental sustainability. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his confusing and inconsistent political affiliations, including running on the Republican ballot while also promoting a write-in campaign in the Democratic primary, show a lack of clear commitment to our party's principles. This inconsistency makes him seem unreliable and ineffective, which is unacceptable for a governor. (5 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because they advocate for an 'inclusive Oregon' and promote 'progressive values' like accessible healthcare and reducing homelessness, which aligns with the critical need for social equity in our state. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform, while promoting economic growth and safer communities, lacks specific, detailed policy proposals for significant tax cuts or deregulation that would directly enhance wealth preservation for high-income residents. His focus on an "inclusive Oregon" implies a broader spending approach that may not prioritize fiscal conservatism. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear focus on making healthcare immediate and affordable for all Oregonians. They advocate for policies that protect local hospitals and ensure everyone, regardless of insurance status, can get the care they need, which is the most important value for improving public health. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any publicly available information that clearly outlines his specific stance on parental control in education or children's healthcare, which is the most important issue for my vote. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because of his past statements indicating he is against abortion and would support measures to restrict it, directly threatening reproductive freedom for voters. The safeguarding of existing gender rights is a non-negotiable value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while he has a background in business and farming and talks about 'progress and prosperity for all,' his platform lacks specific details on tax cuts or deregulation that would directly and significantly impact the stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he talks about tackling homelessness and supporting law enforcement, his platform for 'inclusive Oregon' and 'first chances' is a bit too vague. We need strong, clear action, not just good intentions, to fix the major problems facing our communities. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific public statements or actions regarding their stance on gun rights in Oregon. For a single-issue gun voter, a lack of information on this critical topic means I cannot be confident in their commitment to protecting the Second Amendment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite mentioning 'Restoring Your Freedoms' and protecting 'constitutional rights,' his advocacy for social programs like a Statewide Housing Assistance Rental Plan suggests increased government intervention, which undermines individual responsibility and free-market solutions. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear information on his stance regarding abortion. Without a stated position, it is impossible to know if he aligns with the critical value of protecting unborn life. His platform focuses on general issues like homelessness and healthcare access, which do not address my single issue. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is very limited information available about his specific conservative policy positions for this gubernatorial race. While he has a background in management and some prior political attempts, his platform doesn't clearly articulate how he plans to tackle the critical issues facing Oregon from a strong Republican perspective. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he advocates for intelligent policy initiatives that promote economic growth and supports legitimate law enforcement. This balanced approach to fostering a stronger economy while maintaining public safety is crucial for a stable and prosperous Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Robert Neuman high because his campaign emphasizes uniting communities, fostering inclusive growth, and protecting Oregon's environment through sustainable practices, like supporting loggers to plant new trees. This values a holistic approach to state leadership that cares for both people and the planet. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he has filed as a Republican candidate, detailed information on his specific policy stances for governor is limited. This lack of a clear platform on issues relevant to human dignity, social justice, and evidence-based policy makes it difficult to evaluate his alignment with humanist values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Robert Neuman low as I could not find a clear and comprehensive public platform outlining his specific plans for Oregon. I believe a governor needs to have a well-defined vision for addressing the state's problems, particularly regarding our economy and public safety. Without that, it's difficult to support his candidacy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because of their stated commitment to an inclusive Oregon. While a Republican, their focus on tackling homelessness and poverty, alongside supporting the vote-by-mail system, shows a glimmer of responsiveness to community needs and democratic participation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform focuses broadly on economic growth and innovative solutions, but it lacks specific details on how he plans to tackle inflation through tax cuts, spending reductions, or deregulation. Transparency is good, but concrete anti-inflation policies are needed. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no readily available information on his specific policy stances or values, especially concerning the critical moral issues of life and family. Without such information, it is impossible to determine his alignment with our faith's principles. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find specific information about their stance on taxes in Oregon. A clear and strong position on lowering taxes is essential for my vote, and that information is missing. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there's a lack of publicly available information about his specific policy proposals for the 2026 gubernatorial race. As a middle-income voter, I need clear plans on how a candidate will improve affordability and public safety. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because the complete lack of accessible public information regarding their policies or background makes it impossible to determine any potential alignment with progressive values, representing an unacceptable unknown risk. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his campaign focuses on tackling homelessness and poverty, and also on healthcare access. These are big needs for people in my situation, and it's good to see someone committed to them. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he has advocated for fiscal conservatism and individual liberties, there is limited information on his specific plans for ensuring public safety and restoring order, which are critical for our community's well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available information about his platform or specific policy stances. An extreme office worker demands clear, conservative solutions, not an unknown agenda. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because there is insufficient public information available to understand their specific policy stances for the gubernatorial election. Without clear proposals on issues like housing insecurity, police reform, or economic justice in urban areas, it is impossible to determine if their leadership would align with the urgent need for systemic change in Portland. This lack of transparency means voters cannot trust that their administration would prioritize the voices and needs of marginalized communities over entrenched power structures. (0 votes)

Reason Robert Neuman's focus on government accountability, even if sparked by a specific event, suggests a desire to hold officials responsible. This aligns with the need for strong oversight to ensure our leaders are acting in the best interests of the public. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while specific detailed policy stances for their gubernatorial run are not prominent, their general Republican affiliation and past run for labor commissioner suggest a focus on business interests that often comes at the expense of worker protections and social safety nets, which are important progressive values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he speaks of restoring freedoms and supporting law enforcement, his platform lacks explicit detail on how he will uphold traditional moral and religious values. His focus on broad issues leaves some uncertainty for a voter prioritizing faith. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he addresses homelessness and public safety, his ideas sometimes align too closely with Democratic approaches, which is not the strong conservative change Portland needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough publicly available information about his specific conservative platform or relevant experience to make an informed decision. For a critical role like governor, I need a candidate with clear and detailed plans to address Oregon's challenges. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his platform emphasizes "People, Progress, Equality" and a commitment to tackling homelessness, poverty, and healthcare issues without overt religious rhetoric, which aligns with a secular, humanist approach to social welfare important for a thriving community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he is focused on "building safer communities" and "supporting legitimate law enforcement." This dedication to maintaining order and upholding justice through established authority is essential for protecting the well-being of all people and ensuring a harmonious society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is not enough specific information available about his plans for Oregon to make an informed decision for governor. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is not enough readily available information about his specific policy positions or relevant experience to understand how he would address the critical issues facing manual workers in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is insufficient public information available about his specific policy positions or platform for governor. A candidate must clearly articulate how they will lead and what they stand for to gain the trust of traditional voters. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because their public profile and policy details, especially on environmental matters, are not extensively documented. This means they haven't publicly championed policies that would actively harm Oregon's environment, making them a less immediate concern than those with clear anti-environmental records, which aligns with our core value of ecological preservation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Robert Neuman low due to a lack of publicly available information about his specific policy positions or a clear conservative platform for the gubernatorial race. As a voter, I need to understand a candidate's concrete plans and values to support them, and this information is currently missing. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while he emphasizes supporting law enforcement and making communities safer, his platform also includes progressive values which may not fully align with a strict adherence to traditional principles. A clear focus on traditional family values and fiscal conservatism is more important for a stable society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough publicly available information about his specific policy positions for the 2026 gubernatorial race to determine how he would address the critical issues facing Oregon. (0 votes)
#11
Brad T. Peters

Reason I rank this candidate high because he explicitly states his opposition to "child transition." This firm stand on protecting children from practices that contradict natural order and traditional family values is crucial for fostering a morally sound generation, reflecting a vital commitment to the well-being and upbringing of our youth. (17 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his opposition to 'child transition' directly undermines the vital principle of LGBTQ+ affirming healthcare and bodily autonomy for all individuals, a core value for our community. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he proposes expediting geothermal energy development at Newberry Crater to improve Oregon's energy security. This is a concrete step towards increasing renewable energy, which is vital for transitioning away from fossil fuels and securing a clean energy future for Oregon. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he opposes child transition, a crucial stance in line with protecting childhood innocence and traditional understanding of human development. This policy choice directly impacts the moral well-being of our youth. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his background in technology and focus on using it to make government more efficient is a fresh idea. He also wants to make life affordable again, especially with housing, which is a major struggle for people like me in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he stands for individual freedom and aims to reduce regulatory madness, particularly for farmers. Less regulation means less government interference in private enterprise and property, which is vital for economic liberty and prosperity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Brad T. Peters high because his tech background and focus on using AI and automation to revolutionize education, manufacturing, and renewable energy points to a future-oriented vision for Oregon. This values smart, innovative solutions for economic growth and sustainability. (1 votes)

Reason Brad T. Peters offers a clear focus on fiscal responsibility by proposing to end regulatory madness for farmers and reforming land-use policies. This common-sense approach to cutting bureaucracy and supporting our agricultural backbone is important for making Oregon affordable again. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he advocates for equitable standards in Oregon Health Plan coverage, he also stated opposition to 'child transition' healthcare. Healthcare access should be comprehensive and inclusive for all individuals, and limiting specific types of care is a concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available regarding his stance on abortion. As a single-issue voter, it is crucial to know a candidate's position on protecting unborn life, and without any information, he cannot be considered a viable option for advancing this core value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he speaks about freedom, fiscal responsibility, and personal accountability, there isn't enough specific information about his detailed conservative plans for Oregon. I need a clear vision for how he will tackle issues like crime and taxes, not just general principles. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low-medium because he emphasizes expanding opportunity, making life affordable, and preparing children for tomorrow's economy, as well as an opposition to child transition. These priorities align with traditional values and economic stability, which are important for our community's future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because while his background as a technologist and focus on science and renewable energy are positive for evidence-based policy, his stated opposition to 'child transition' is a regressive social stance that undermines individual autonomy and LGBTQ+ rights, which are fundamental values in a progressive city. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because their stated core principles align generally with gun rights, but lack specific detail. Brad T. Peters identifies as a conservative who believes in individual freedom and loves the Constitution and Bill of Rights. This suggests a respect for the Second Amendment, which is vital for protecting our liberty. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he brings a much-needed business and technology perspective to government, which can help streamline things. His stance against child transition and commitment to making life more affordable are good, showing he's aligned with conservative values. He also claims to understand both rural and urban Oregon, which is important for bridging divides. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because there is a lack of widespread public information outlining their detailed policy stances, particularly regarding environmental regulations and climate change. This limited public record suggests they have not vocally or actively supported policies detrimental to our planet, making them a marginally better choice than candidates with known anti-environmental platforms, as we prioritize ecological well-being. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Republican, I appreciate their participation in the primary. However, without specific details on their policies or platform, it is difficult to assess how they will address the critical issues facing Oregon like public safety and fiscal responsibility, which are paramount to me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their public platform does not address immigration policy. My vote is based solely on a candidate's commitment to enforcing immigration laws, and without that information, I cannot confidently support them. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is very limited information available about his specific policy positions for governor. Without clear stances on issues like social justice, education, healthcare, or environmental protection, it is impossible to determine how his leadership would align with humanist values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available public information on their stance regarding gender rights or abortion, which creates significant uncertainty for voters. Transparency and a clear commitment to reproductive freedom are important values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Brad T. Peters low due to the limited public information available about his policy positions and qualifications. To lead Oregon, a candidate must clearly articulate their strategies for improving our schools, reducing crime, and managing state finances. The absence of such details makes it impossible for me to consider him a serious contender. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he brings a new perspective from the tech world, focusing on growing our economy and making housing affordable. He wants to cut red tape and support small businesses with zero tax, which could actually create good jobs and help people afford to live here. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their focus on practical solutions. Their emphasis on leveraging technology for economic growth and developing renewable energy could bring positive change, aligning with a future-oriented and environmentally conscious Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is no readily available information on their specific conservative policy positions or relevant experience for the governor's office. Without a clear platform or track record that aligns with our values, they cannot be seriously considered for leadership in these critical times. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because the complete lack of accessible public information regarding their policies or background makes it impossible to determine any potential alignment with progressive values, representing an unacceptable unknown risk. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any information about his platform for the 2026 governor's race that addresses the urgent issues of low income, housing, or poverty in Portland. Without a clear plan, it's difficult to see how he would help. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign focuses on vague concepts like 'freedom, fiscal responsibility, and personal accountability' without offering specific plans relevant to rural Oregonians. A candidate for governor needs detailed proposals, not just broad statements. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his background in technology and his plan for economic growth, like offering zero tax for new startups, could bring much-needed innovation and jobs to Oregon. His focus on cutting regulatory burdens for businesses and farmers shows he understands how to make our state competitive again. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle due to the limited availability of detailed information on their specific policy positions for the 2026 gubernatorial race. Without a clear articulation of their plans for addressing issues central to Portland, such as affordable housing, police accountability, or racial justice, it's impossible to assess their potential to effect meaningful, systemic change. This lack of a defined platform makes it hard to see how their leadership would truly benefit the most impacted communities and challenge existing inequalities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no publicly available information regarding specific economic policies, tax proposals, or business regulations that would directly impact the stock market. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform emphasizes leveraging technology for economic growth and streamlining government, which could lead to greater efficiency. His opposition to child transition policies while supporting adult fertility preservation reflects a focus on traditional values while acknowledging personal choice for adults. This balanced approach to social issues, combined with a forward-thinking economic plan, is important for a thriving society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is a lack of publicly available information regarding their specific policy proposals for the gubernatorial election, making it difficult to assess how they would address key concerns such as fiscal conservatism, tax reduction, or economic growth important to high-income residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because of a mixed policy bag. While his opposition to 'child transition' is a significant concern for LGBTQ+ rights, his plan to expedite geothermal energy development for renewable resources offers a specific, positive environmental policy. This partial alignment with climate action, despite other conservative stances, is a rare point of commonality. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his technology background and proposals for expanding Urban Growth Boundaries to address housing affordability offer innovative solutions to a critical urban problem. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is not enough specific information available about his plans for Oregon to make an informed decision for governor. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is not enough readily available information about his specific policy positions or relevant experience to understand how he would address the critical issues facing manual workers in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his focus on technology and economic growth is interesting, his platform is less explicit on the traditional conservative social issues that are crucial for restoring Oregon's values. A clear defense of our way of life is more important than abstract technological solutions right now. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any publicly available information that clearly outlines his specific stance on parental control in education or children's healthcare, which is the most important issue for my vote. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Brad T. Peters in the middle because he brings a background in technology and a focus on economic growth by reducing regulatory burdens for sectors like agriculture and timber. His emphasis on streamlined government and individual freedom is a positive, as it aims to create more opportunities and reduce government interference in our lives. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his platform prioritizes expanding economic opportunity, making life affordable, and preparing children for tomorrow's economy through technology and educational pathways. His commitment to individual freedom and dignity, along with reducing regulatory burdens for farmers, supports prosperity and self-reliance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough publicly available information about his specific policy positions for the 2026 gubernatorial race to determine how he would address the critical issues facing Oregon. (0 votes)
#12
Matthew Piatt

Reason I rank this candidate last because he has formally withdrawn his candidacy for Governor due to a lack of campaign donations. As such, he is not a viable option to vote for in the upcoming primary election. (32 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because he has publicly withdrawn from the gubernatorial race due to a lack of campaign donations. His withdrawal means he is no longer a viable option for the primary election. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because he has withdrawn from the race. As a single-issue voter, a candidate who is no longer running cannot possibly advance the crucial value of protecting unborn life, making him an entirely unviable option. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high due to the limited public record of their specific policy positions, especially concerning environmental stewardship and climate action. Without clear evidence of advocating for policies that harm our natural world, they present a less defined threat than others who have actively opposed ecological protections, which is a critical consideration for a sustainable future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Republican, I appreciate their participation in the primary. However, without specific details on their policies or platform, it is difficult to assess how they will address the critical issues facing Oregon like public safety and fiscal responsibility, which are paramount to me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Matthew Piatt lowest because he has withdrawn from the gubernatorial race due to lack of campaign donations, meaning he is no longer an active option for voters. This means he cannot directly represent the values important to voters. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because he withdrew from the race due to a lack of campaign donations. While his past stance on education reform had some merit, a candidate who is no longer actively running cannot effectively champion individual liberty or limited government. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because his platform, framed around being a 'constitutional conservative' and prioritizing 'academic mastery' over 'political priorities' in education, raises concerns about potential ideological interference in curricula, possibly at the expense of comprehensive, inclusive, and evidence-based learning that values diverse perspectives. This approach could undermine the humanist commitment to fostering critical thinking and an open, secular education system. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available public information on their stance regarding gender rights or abortion, which creates significant uncertainty for voters. Transparency and a clear commitment to reproductive freedom are important values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Matthew Piatt low because I could not find a clear and detailed platform or significant political experience. For a governor, it's essential to have a well-articulated plan for our state's future and a history of public service. Without these, it's hard to trust he has the capabilities to lead. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no readily available information on his specific policy stances or values, especially concerning the critical moral issues of life and family. Without such information, it is impossible to determine his alignment with our faith's principles. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find specific information about their stance on taxes in Oregon. Without a detailed plan or expressed views on tax reduction, I cannot assess their commitment to my most important issue. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I couldn't find sufficient information regarding his platform or specific plans for Oregon's governorship in 2026. Without clear policy positions, it's difficult for me to determine how he would address the concerns of middle-income residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is no readily available information on their specific conservative policy positions or relevant experience for the governor's office. Without a clear platform or track record that aligns with our values, they cannot be seriously considered for leadership in these critical times. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because the complete lack of accessible public information regarding their policies or background makes it impossible to determine any potential alignment with progressive values, representing an unacceptable unknown risk. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low due to a lack of publicly available information regarding his specific stances, history, or policies. Without clear details on his platform, it is impossible to determine how he aligns with the values and needs of rural Oregon. There is no evidence_link as no information was found. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low-medium because his past platform included parental rights, individual liberties, and fiscal responsibility. These are important values for community stability and raising families, but a clear statewide vision for critical issues is less apparent. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available information about his platform or specific policy stances. Without a clear commitment to conservative principles and actionable plans, it's impossible to support this candidacy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because I could not find any specific information about their healthcare policies or plans. Without a clear stance on healthcare, I cannot determine their suitability for addressing the most important issue facing Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of the very limited public information available regarding their specific policy positions, which makes it impossible to determine if they would uphold or undermine the progressive values important to our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because there is a notable lack of public information outlining their specific policy positions for the upcoming gubernatorial election. Without a clear and detailed platform addressing critical issues like the housing crisis, systemic racism in the justice system, or economic disparities in Portland, it's impossible to determine their commitment to real, radical change. This absence of transparency leaves voters unable to trust that their leadership would prioritize the needs of marginalized communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because I could not find any substantial public information regarding his campaign platform or policy positions for the Republican nomination for Governor. For a candidate to be considered, they must clearly communicate their intentions and solutions for the state's pressing issues. The absence of such information makes it impossible to assess his viability or alignment with my values. (0 votes)

Reason Matthew Piatt has not presented a clear and compelling conservative platform with specific plans that resonate with the urgency needed to address Oregon's decline. His lack of distinct policy proposals means he hasn't shown he is strong enough to fight against the progressive forces that threaten our way of life. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because he has withdrawn from the gubernatorial race. Therefore, he is no longer a viable option to represent our values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his strong focus on dismantling and rebuilding the Oregon Department of Education to prioritize education over "indoctrination," which is important for the future of urban youth. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I have not been able to find sufficient details about his platform or prior experience. A candidate for governor must have a well-defined conservative agenda and a track record that instills confidence. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is no readily available information regarding their specific policy positions or public statements that would indicate alignment with secular governance, scientific reasoning, or progressive social values, making them an unknown and unlikely choice for an extreme atheist. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his focus on "restoring public education" with an emphasis on "education, not indoctrination," and his commitment to reinforcing the "rule of law." This approach is important for ensuring that our children receive an education free from harmful ideologies and that societal norms are upheld, safeguarding the future of our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is not enough specific information available about his plans for Oregon to make an informed decision for governor. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is not enough readily available information about his specific policy positions or relevant experience to understand how he would address the critical issues facing manual workers in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is insufficient public information available about his specific policy positions or platform for governor. Without a clear message, it's impossible to evaluate his commitment to conservative values and a better Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any publicly available information that clearly outlines his specific stance on parental control in education or children's healthcare, which is the most important issue for my vote. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific public statements or actions regarding their stance on gun rights in Oregon. For a single-issue gun voter, a lack of information on this critical topic means I cannot be confident in their commitment to protecting the Second Amendment. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough publicly available information about his specific policy positions for the 2026 gubernatorial race to determine how he would address the critical issues facing Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because he has withdrawn from the race due to a lack of campaign donations, making him no longer a viable choice for governor. Although he identified as a constitutional conservative, his campaign is no longer active. (0 votes)
#13
Paul Romero

Reason I rank Paul Romero first because his 'Contract With Oregonians' directly calls for the elimination of state income and property taxes, which is a bold and essential step to fix our state's affordability crisis. This aligns with my core value of fiscal freedom, empowering families by letting them keep more of their hard-earned money instead of constantly feeding a bloated government. (19 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his call to eliminate state income and property taxes would drastically defund essential public services and his opposition to 'agendas' in schools threatens inclusive education, which are critical for our community's well-being and future. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because of his past policy advocating for a complete ban on abortion in Oregon, which would entirely strip away reproductive choices for voters. The fundamental right to bodily autonomy and reproductive freedom is the most important value. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his detailed policy on parental control in education, which is crucial for our children's future. His 'Contract With Oregonians' specifically commits to restoring parental rights in education, including requiring parental permission for biology classes and ensuring full curriculum transparency. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate as medium because his consistent emphasis on fiscal conservatism and individual liberty, while not directly anti-environmental, often translates into policies that resist public funding for green infrastructure and environmental regulations. This general approach can undermine collective efforts to combat climate change and protect public lands, which are vital for a sustainable future. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because I could not find any specific information about their healthcare policies or plans. Without a clear stance on healthcare, I cannot determine their suitability for addressing the most important issue facing Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low-medium because he has previously campaigned on border security and government accountability. While these are relevant conservative issues, more specific and concrete plans for addressing local public safety and economic challenges are needed. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific public statements or actions regarding their stance on gun rights in Oregon. For a single-issue gun voter, a lack of information on this critical topic means I cannot be confident in their commitment to protecting the Second Amendment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he's a Navy veteran who understands the importance of liberty and limited government. He wants to end wasteful taxes and stop ideological agendas in our schools, pushing for real education instead of woke nonsense. His emphasis on faith, family, and freedom is exactly what Oregon needs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent advocacy for individual freedom and constitutional limits on government power. His platform aims to eliminate state income and property taxes, which is paramount for ensuring people can keep more of their earnings and control their own assets, strengthening economic liberty. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his platform emphasizes restoring liberty, reducing taxes, and prioritizing parental rights, which are fundamental to a free and morally sound society. His commitment to shifting power from government to individual Oregonians aligns with the importance of self-determination and community-led values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his bold policy to eliminate state income and property taxes offers the most direct and substantial financial benefit for high-income residents and property owners in Oregon. This drastic reduction in taxation would significantly enhance wealth retention and make Oregon a far more attractive place for investment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he champions the elimination of wasteful taxes and protection of private property. His 'Contract With Oregonians' aims to rein in bloated government and return power to the people, which is vital for true freedom and economic growth. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Paul Romero low because, while his focus on individual liberty and being anti-establishment is appealing, his platforms often lack specific, actionable plans for the immediate, tangible problems facing Portland residents. This doesn't sufficiently value concrete solutions over abstract principles. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his stated belief that education should focus on 'truth, not agendas,' specifically mentioning 'STEM, civics, and practical skills, not drag shows and confusion,' directly opposes inclusive and comprehensive education. This suggests a desire to exclude discussions of LGBTQ+ issues from schools, which fundamentally conflicts with the humanist commitment to promoting human dignity, critical thinking, and respect for all individuals regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Paul Romero low because there is a lack of readily available information on his specific policy stances and his background for this office. I need to see concrete proposals on how a candidate plans to fix Oregon's problems, especially concerning taxes and crime. Without this, his candidacy remains unclear. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he wants to shrink big government and cut taxes, which is exactly what Oregon needs to become affordable again. His 'Contract With Oregonians' is all about returning power to regular people and protecting our property rights, which is a big deal when everything costs too much. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific policy proposals or statements on their stance regarding crime and public safety in Oregon. As a single-issue voter, it's crucial for a candidate to clearly address how they will make our communities safer. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because of their strong emphasis on 'restoring liberty' and 'parents, not bureaucrats' rhetoric. These phrases often serve as conservative dog whistles against public education and LGBTQ+ rights, directly threatening the inclusive values important to Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find specific information about their stance on taxes in Oregon. As a single-issue taxes voter, I need to see a clear and strong commitment to reducing the tax burden on residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he promises to end government overreach and eliminate crippling taxes. This focus on protecting private property and giving power back to the people is important to me as a middle-income voter who feels like the government takes too much. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his "Contract with Oregonians" outlines a clear commitment to restoring constitutional rights, eliminating wasteful taxes, and protecting private property. His Navy veteran background and emphasis on faith and family align with core conservative values, which are important for taking back our state from government overreach. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform, while generally conservative with calls to limit "wasteful taxes" and "government overreach," is less overtly hostile to progressive social values compared to other candidates. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because they also want to stop rent price gouging by executive order, which would make a big difference for families struggling with housing costs in Oregon. They also want to make land affordable for regular Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he emphasizes restoring constitutional rights and protecting private property. His 'Contract With Oregonians' aims to rein in government and eliminate wasteful taxes, which is a strong message for getting power back to the people. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite his strong conservative stance on ending government overreach and eliminating crippling taxes, his history of losing multiple Republican primary elections for other offices makes me question his ability to win and deliver results for Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform, which includes criticizing 'ideological agendas' and 'drag shows and confusion' in schools, aligns with a regressive social conservatism that actively harms our diverse and progressive community. His focus on 'constitutional foundations' and 'eliminating wasteful taxes' often translates into cuts for vital social programs and a disregard for addressing systemic inequalities. This emphasis on traditional conservative values, combined with his past labeling of Democrats as 'socialists,' indicates a divisive approach that would further marginalize and disenfranchise many residents of Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his 'Contract With Oregonians' explicitly aims to eliminate state income and property taxes and the Corporate Activity Tax. These bold tax reduction proposals would significantly boost the business environment and, consequently, the stock market. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his strong stance on parental rights in education and his belief in limiting government overreach. He advocates for schools to teach STEM, civics, and practical skills, not agendas, which is important for preparing our children for success. This focus on traditional values and education that prioritizes real-world skills is essential for strong families and a competitive workforce. (0 votes)

Reason Paul Romero's background as a US Navy veteran and his emphasis on faith, family, and freedom resonate deeply. He aims to end government overreach and eliminate crippling taxes, which is exactly the kind of leadership we need to protect our property and individual liberties. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his conservative platform, particularly his historical focus on reducing government spending and regulations, would likely lead to cuts in essential social services and environmental protections. These actions directly contradict progressive goals for a robust social safety net and a healthy planet. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough specific public information available about his policy positions or his stance on faith-based and traditional values for the 2026 gubernatorial race. It is difficult to assess his alignment with core principles without clear statements. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite general conservative principles, there is not enough specific policy detail on how he plans to address the pressing urban issues facing Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his 'Contract With Oregonians' clearly outlines plans to restore constitutional rights, eliminate wasteful taxes, and protect private property. As a Navy veteran, his emphasis on disciplined governance and individual freedom is a strong appeal for returning power to the people and away from government overreach. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform explicitly states he believes in 'faith, family, hard work, and freedom' as guiding principles, which suggests a potential for religious influence in governance rather than strict secularism, a value that is paramount for an atheist. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low due to the lack of available public information regarding his specific stances and platform for the upcoming election. A leader must clearly articulate their vision for the state, and without such clarity, it is impossible to assess their suitability for office. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his clear mission to restore constitutional rights and protect private property is crucial for reining in government overreach in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he pledges to eliminate wasteful taxes and protect private property, which directly helps working folks keep more of their hard-earned money and secure their futures. His "Contract With Oregonians" shows a clear plan to rein in government overreach. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he emphasizes core conservative principles like restoring constitutional rights, protecting private property, and reducing wasteful taxes. As a Navy veteran, his focus on self-discipline and service above self is important for a leader in our state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his bold plan to eliminate state income and property taxes will bring much-needed financial relief to hardworking families and businesses struggling with the high cost of living in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his stated deep faith, focus on family, and belief that 'strong moral foundations begin at home.' While he doesn't explicitly state an abortion stance, these values align with a pro-life perspective, suggesting he would prioritize policies that protect the unborn. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available about their stance on climate change or environmental policies. For a single-issue climate voter, the absence of a position on the most critical issue facing Oregon indicates a lack of priority for environmental protection, which is unacceptable. (0 votes)
#14
DeAngelo Turner

Reason I rank this candidate high because they propose to stop rent price gouging. Living in Portland, rent is a huge problem, and taking action to make housing more affordable is the most important thing to help people like me make ends meet. (9 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his past conviction for murder, even with claims of innocence, would be a major distraction and hinder his ability to effectively lead as governor. While he speaks about Republican values, a strong leader focused on law and order cannot have such a significant personal history overshadowing their ability to govern. (13 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his past conviction for murder, even with his claims of innocence, raises serious concerns about his moral character and reliability as a leader. A governor must embody trustworthiness and a proven record of upholding moral conduct, which a past violent crime undermines, making him unsuitable for office. (5 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he talks about cutting taxes and standing with farmers, his past felony conviction is a serious concern for a leadership position. A governor needs to represent all Oregonians with an untarnished record. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because I could not find any specific information about their healthcare policies or plans. Without a clear stance on healthcare, I cannot determine their suitability for addressing the most important issue facing Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because his plan to lower taxes by 5 to 7 percent and stop rent price gouging would directly help working people save money and make living in Oregon more affordable, showing he understands the financial squeeze we're under. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available public information on their stance regarding gender rights or abortion, which creates significant uncertainty for voters. Transparency and a clear commitment to reproductive freedom are important values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because their proposal to eliminate taxes for businesses and criticism of the Democratic party, while conservative, are presented with less detailed policy, potentially making their campaign less effective in building broad consensus against progressive policies. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific public statements or actions regarding their stance on gun rights in Oregon. For a single-issue gun voter, a lack of information on this critical topic means I cannot be confident in their commitment to protecting the Second Amendment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough publicly available information on his specific policy positions to determine a clear commitment to limited government and individual liberty. A lack of transparent policy proposals makes it difficult to trust his alignment with libertarian values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available regarding his stance on abortion. As a single-issue voter, it is crucial to know a candidate's position on protecting unborn life, and without any information, he cannot be considered a viable option for advancing this core value. (1 votes)

Reason DeAngelo Turner has not presented a clear and compelling conservative platform with specific plans that resonate with the urgency needed to address Oregon's decline. His lack of distinct policy proposals means he hasn't shown he is strong enough to fight against the progressive forces that threaten our way of life. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because their specific policy positions on environmental and climate issues are not widely publicized or established. This lack of a clear anti-environmental record means they are not as openly committed to policies that undermine sustainability efforts as other candidates, offering a slight preference in a difficult field for those who value ecological health. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his personal history offers a direct challenge to the systems that have oppressed our communities. His 32 years in prison, even claiming innocence for murder, and his work on re-entry programs, show a deep understanding of the broken justice system that most politicians ignore. His willingness to run as a Republican, while criticizing both parties in a unique way, demonstrates a radical independence that could truly disrupt the status quo and bring much-needed systemic change to Portland, valuing liberation and justice over empty political promises. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he is a Portland resident who understands the local issues, especially concerning taxes and economic burdens. His desire to eliminate price gouging for rent and lower taxes for businesses shows a commitment to making life more affordable and attracting jobs to our state, which directly impacts our community's prosperity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank DeAngelo Turner medium because his focus on lowering taxes, addressing rent price gouging, and providing raises for state workers and teachers directly tackles economic pressures facing young Oregonians. This values financial relief and support for essential workers. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any information on their immigration policy. The lack of a clear stance on this critical issue means they do not align with my priorities as an immigration-focused voter. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because, despite mentioning freedom of expression, his strong emphasis on strict adherence to the law, including using his power to remove individuals not 'legally supposed to be here,' suggests a potentially rigid and uncompassionate approach to immigration and human rights. This could lead to policies that marginalize vulnerable populations, which conflicts with humanist values of universal dignity and social justice. (0 votes)

Reason I rank DeAngelo Turner low because I was unable to find sufficient public information about his platform or political history. As a voter, I need clear and specific plans from a candidate for governor to address our state's pressing issues. The lack of such information makes it difficult to assess his qualifications. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough information available about his campaign or specific policy proposals to understand how he would address the major issues facing Oregon. A lack of clear public statements makes it difficult to assess his suitability for governor. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific policy proposals or statements on their stance regarding crime and public safety in Oregon. As a single-issue voter, it's crucial for a candidate to clearly address how they will make our communities safer. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while their proposal to eliminate rent price gouging is interesting, their overall platform lacks detailed and realistic solutions. The strong '100% all in on the Republican party' stance suggests a primary focus on conservative ideology rather than pragmatic governance for all Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find specific information on his economic policies or plans to combat inflation. Without clear proposals on taxes, spending, or regulation, it is difficult to assess his commitment to my primary concern. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find specific information about their stance on taxes in Oregon. It is critical for me to understand how a candidate plans to lower taxes for Oregonians, and this information is not available. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is very little public information available about his policy positions for the upcoming governor's election. I need a candidate to articulate clear strategies for improving the cost of living and safety in our communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his focus on ending "price gouging for rent" directly addresses the severe housing affordability crisis in Portland, which is a critical issue for students and families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite identifying as a Republican and expressing a desire to work for Oregon's citizens, his platform lacks detailed plans for addressing the pressing issues of public safety and economic stability that are vital for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available information about his platform or specific policy stances. An extreme office worker needs to see a strong, defined agenda to believe a candidate can truly 'take back' Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no publicly available information regarding specific economic policies, tax proposals, or business regulations that would directly impact the stock market. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is a lack of publicly accessible information outlining his specific policy positions or campaign objectives for the Republican nomination for Governor. Voters need clear, detailed proposals to understand how a candidate plans to lead Oregon, and without this transparency, it is not possible to make an informed decision. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is a lack of publicly available information regarding their specific policy proposals for the gubernatorial election, making it difficult to assess how they would address key concerns such as fiscal conservatism, tax reduction, or economic growth important to high-income residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their unique and unconventional background, which makes them highly unelectable in a general election, thereby making it easier for a progressive to win. Their stated policy of removing 'price gouging on rent' through executive order, if enacted, could also offer a tangible benefit to housing affordability, aligning with a key progressive economic justice value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough specific public information available about his policy positions or his stance on faith-based and traditional values for the 2026 gubernatorial race. It is difficult to assess his alignment with core principles without clear statements. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest due to a complete lack of publicly available information about his specific policy positions for the 2026 Oregon gubernatorial race, leaving me with no basis to support his candidacy for our struggling city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his commitment to being '100% all in on the Republican party' and his focus on lowering taxes by 5-7% directly addresses the burden on Oregonians. His desire to end rent gouging in Portland and attract businesses through tax reductions shows he wants to revive our economy and stop harmful progressive policies. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is not enough specific information available about his plans for Oregon to make an informed decision for governor. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he advocates for lower taxes and supporting the timber industry, his past and less conventional political background do not present the steady, established conservative leadership that our state urgently needs to address its current challenges. (0 votes)

Reason I rank DeAngelo Turner low because, while he identifies as Republican and speaks about the Constitution, his past as a convicted felon and a less defined platform on key conservative issues like taxes, crime, and education make him a less appealing choice. I prefer candidates with a clear and untarnished record focused on traditional conservative governance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is a lack of readily available and detailed public information about their policy positions for the governorship. Voters need transparency and concrete plans on issues like law and order and economic stability to make an informed decision for the future of Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because while he speaks about the Constitution and choosing the Republican party, his background includes a felony conviction and a significant lack of occupational or governmental experience. His platform does not provide enough specific, strong conservative policies to address Oregon's issues. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available about their stance on climate change or environmental policies. For a single-issue climate voter, the absence of a position on the most critical issue facing Oregon indicates a lack of priority for environmental protection, which is unacceptable. (0 votes)
#15
Wen Waddell

Reason Wen Waddell's platform currently lacks the specific, bold conservative policy proposals needed to aggressively tackle Oregon's most pressing issues from an extreme perspective. Her general focus on "One Oregon in Opportunity" is too vague to inspire confidence in truly overturning the state's liberal trajectory. (15 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he has publicly expressed skepticism regarding human-caused climate change and advocated for policies that support traditional resource industries without adequate environmental constraints. This denial of scientific consensus and push for unsustainable practices poses a direct threat to Oregon's climate goals and natural ecosystems, which we are committed to protecting. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their commitment to improving healthcare access, especially in rural areas, and ensuring reliable transportation to appointments. Their professional background in public health and work on addiction policy shows a deep understanding of systemic issues, which is crucial for effective health reform. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any information on their immigration policy. For me, immigration is the defining issue, and a candidate who does not address it cannot earn my support. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any publicly available information that clearly outlines her specific stance on parental control in education or children's healthcare, which is the most important issue for my vote. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her campaign focuses on general themes of 'opportunity' and 'real change,' but it lacks specific economic policies, tax reforms, or deregulation proposals that would directly benefit the stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is insufficient public information available about her specific policy positions or platform for governor. Voters need to know a candidate's stance on key issues to make an informed decision for our state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform focuses on general ideas like 'One Oregon in Opportunity' and governmental change, but lacks specific positions on critical moral issues. Without clear stances on protecting life and family, it's hard to assess her alignment with our values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while their platform states 'All people deserve respect equally,' there is no specific public information on their stance regarding gender rights or abortion, creating uncertainty for voters. A clear commitment to reproductive freedom is an important value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific public statements or actions regarding their stance on gun rights in Oregon. For a single-issue gun voter, a lack of information on this critical topic means I cannot be confident in their commitment to protecting the Second Amendment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because they prioritize shrinking our carbon footprint, especially in building and reconstruction. This focus directly helps reduce emissions in our urban environment, which is critical for making Portland more resilient to climate change and promoting a healthier future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough publicly available information on her specific policy positions to determine a clear commitment to limited government and individual liberty. A lack of transparent policy proposals makes it difficult to trust her alignment with libertarian values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because they acknowledge high tax burdens and the rising cost of living, stating that government spending is too high. They also oppose new tax proposals. This focus on affordability and fiscal responsibility is good, but I'd like to see more detailed plans for specific tax cuts. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available regarding his stance on abortion. As a single-issue voter, it is crucial to know a candidate's position on protecting unborn life, and without any information, he cannot be considered a viable option for advancing this core value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform is very general, talking about 'One Oregon in Opportunity' and ensuring 'no one gets left behind.' While these sound nice, there aren't enough specific details on how she plans to fix the deep problems like homelessness and high costs that are hurting us every day. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her background in criminal justice suggests a potential focus on law and order, which is important for the safety of our communities. As a Portland resident, her desire for 'real change' starting at the state level is a positive, even if specific policies are not yet fully detailed. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Wen Waddell low because her past campaign emphasis on parental rights and general government overreach, while having some valid points, often veers into divisive social issues rather than focusing on practical, unifying solutions for all Oregonians. This values a pragmatic approach over ideological battles. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is very limited information available about his specific policy positions for governor. Without clear stances on issues like social justice, education, healthcare, or environmental protection, it is impossible to determine how his leadership would align with humanist values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Wen Waddell low as I could not find adequate information about her specific policy positions for governor. It's crucial for a candidate to clearly communicate their vision and how they plan to tackle the economic and social challenges in Oregon. Without that transparency, it's hard to make an informed decision. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of the limited information available on their specific policy stances. Without clear positions beyond being a Republican, it's difficult to assess their alignment with the diverse needs and progressive values important to Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find specific information on his economic policies or plans to combat inflation. While some generic economic statements were found, clear proposals on taxes, spending, or regulation are missing, making it difficult to assess his commitment to my primary concern. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there's not much information available on her specific policies for Oregon. For a critical election like governor, I need candidates to clearly lay out how they plan to address problems like affordability and public safety in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite a background in criminal justice, her platform lacks the specific, bold conservative policies needed to address Oregon's critical issues like crime and overbearing government. Her general statements about "opportunity" are not enough to inspire confidence in truly reversing the state's decline. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because, despite residing in Portland, the absence of a clear and publicly articulated platform makes it impossible to assess her alignment with progressive values, presenting an unacceptable unknown risk. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her message of 'One Oregon in Opportunity' sounds good, but it's not clear what specific plans she has to help people like me who are struggling with day-to-day costs in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low due to a lack of specific policy proposals that address the unique concerns of rural Oregonians. Her platform, focused on 'One Oregon in Opportunity,' is too general and doesn't clearly outline how she would fight for our values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite declaring her candidacy and having a background in criminal justice, there is insufficient public information detailing concrete plans for addressing the pressing concerns of public safety and economic stability, which are vital for a secure community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of the very limited public information available regarding their specific policy positions, which makes it impossible to determine if they would uphold or undermine the progressive values important to our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because there is little public information available regarding their specific policy platform for the gubernatorial election. The absence of detailed plans on issues such as housing justice, police accountability, or addressing the root causes of economic inequality in Portland means their potential impact on our community remains unknown. Without a clear vision for systemic change, it's difficult to trust that their leadership would bring the radical reforms necessary to uplift marginalized voices and challenge oppressive structures. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because I could not locate any comprehensive public information detailing her campaign platform or specific policy positions for the Republican nomination for Governor. It is essential for candidates to clearly communicate their vision and plans for the state so that voters can make an educated choice. The absence of this information prevents me from evaluating her candidacy effectively. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is a lack of publicly available information regarding their specific policy proposals for the gubernatorial election, making it difficult to assess how they would address key concerns such as fiscal conservatism, tax reduction, or economic growth important to high-income residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because, while her stated goals as a Republican are generally vague, her emphasis on 'all people deserve respect equally and no one gets left behind' suggests a more inclusive rhetoric than many other conservative candidates. This focus on equitable treatment is important, even if the specific policies to achieve it are not detailed. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough specific public information available about his policy positions or his stance on faith-based and traditional values for the 2026 gubernatorial race. It is difficult to assess his alignment with core principles without clear statements. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest due to a complete lack of publicly available information about his specific policy positions for the 2026 Oregon gubernatorial race, making it unclear how he would address the urgent problems in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while her background in criminal justice and desire for a more efficient government are positive, her platform doesn't offer the specific, strong conservative solutions I expect. We need a leader with a clear plan to reverse the state's decline, not general ideas about streamlining. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is no readily available information regarding their specific policy positions or public statements that would indicate alignment with secular governance, scientific reasoning, or progressive social values, making them an unknown and unlikely choice for an extreme atheist. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low due to the lack of available public information regarding her specific stances and platform for the upcoming election. A leader must clearly articulate their vision for the state, and without such clarity, it is impossible to assess their suitability for office. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is not enough specific information available about his plans for Oregon to make an informed decision for governor. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while she talks about "One Oregon in Opportunity" and bringing real change, there isn't enough clear information on her specific policies that would directly address the struggles of manual workers in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Wen Waddell low due to a lack of publicly available information about their specific policy positions or a clear conservative platform for the gubernatorial race. As a voter, I need to understand a candidate's concrete plans and values to support them, and this information is currently missing. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because a candidate's platform should clearly outline how they intend to address critical issues facing the state, such as public safety and economic stability. The absence of such clear information makes it difficult to gauge their suitability for leadership and commitment to core values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her message of 'One Oregon in Opportunity' and commitment to service, while positive, lacks the specific, bold policy proposals needed to address the extreme challenges facing our state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform of 'One Oregon in Opportunity' is too vague and lacks the specific conservative solutions needed for our state. While she has a criminal justice background, there isn't enough detailed information on her policies to truly assess her commitment to core Republican values. (0 votes)
#16
Martin Ward

Reason I rank this candidate worst because of their explicitly discriminatory and regressive policies. Their proposals to make abortions illegal, raise fees on same-sex marriage, and ban transgender surgery are abhorrent and directly attack fundamental human rights and freedoms that Portlanders fiercely defend. (10 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his strong and clear stance against social degradation, specifically his pledge to make abortions illegal and to make 'transexual surgery' illegal. This aligns with the fundamental value of preserving the sanctity of life and traditional family structures, which is paramount for a morally upright society. (7 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because his policies, such as making abortions and transsexual surgery illegal by executive order, and dramatically changing education to only research courses, are extreme and potentially unconstitutional. While I appreciate a strong stance on social issues, these proposals are too radical and impractical to be effective, and some would likely face immediate legal challenges, preventing any real positive change for Oregon. (9 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any information on their immigration policy. Without a stated position on immigration enforcement, they do not demonstrate the commitment needed for my vote. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find specific information on his economic policies or plans to combat inflation. Without clear proposals on taxes, spending, or regulation, it is difficult to assess his commitment to my primary concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any information about his platform for the 2026 governor's race that addresses the urgent issues of low income, housing, or poverty in Portland. Without a clear plan, it's difficult to see how he would help. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific policy proposals or statements on their stance regarding crime and public safety in Oregon. As a single-issue voter, it's crucial for a candidate to clearly address how they will make our communities safer. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he plans to analyze building renewable diesel production facilities in Portland to make it more cost-efficient. While it's still diesel, exploring cleaner fuel options is a step towards reducing emissions and improving air quality in our city. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific public statements or actions regarding their stance on gun rights in Oregon. For a single-issue gun voter, a lack of information on this critical topic means I cannot be confident in their commitment to protecting the Second Amendment. (1 votes)

Reason Martin Ward has not presented a clear and compelling conservative platform with specific plans that resonate with the urgency needed to address Oregon's decline. His lack of distinct policy proposals means he hasn't shown he is strong enough to fight against the progressive forces that threaten our way of life. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because they propose eliminating some specific taxes like the Arts Tax and Paid Parking in Portland, which would directly benefit residents. They also aim to decrease property taxes. However, some proposals involve replacing taxes rather than outright cuts, and the focus is very localized. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is a lack of publicly available information regarding their specific policy proposals for the gubernatorial election, making it difficult to assess how they would address key concerns such as fiscal conservatism, tax reduction, or economic growth important to high-income residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his platform includes policies such as making abortions illegal by executive order, raising fees on same-sex marriage, making transexual surgery illegal, and proposing government ownership of apartments. These are direct assaults on individual liberty, bodily autonomy, and private property rights, which are core libertarian values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Republican, I appreciate their participation in the primary. However, without specific details on their policies or platform, it is difficult to assess how they will address the critical issues facing Oregon like public safety and fiscal responsibility, which are paramount to me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Martin Ward low because there is no readily available public information about his specific policy positions for Governor, making it impossible to assess his vision for Oregon and address the issues important to young Portlanders. This values transparency and clear policy communication from candidates. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is very limited information available about his specific policy positions for governor. Without clear stances on issues like social justice, education, healthcare, or environmental protection, it is impossible to determine how his leadership would align with humanist values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available public information on their stance regarding gender rights or abortion, which creates significant uncertainty for voters. Transparency and a clear commitment to reproductive freedom are important values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any significant information on his platform or specific plans for the Oregon Governor's race. Without a clear public presence or articulated vision, it is impossible to evaluate his candidacy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no readily available information on his specific policy stances or values, especially concerning the critical moral issues of life and family. Without such information, it is impossible to determine his alignment with our faith's principles. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find detailed information on his specific proposals for the state of Oregon as a gubernatorial candidate in 2026. As a voter, I need to see a concrete plan to address the challenges facing my household and community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is no readily available information on their specific conservative policy positions or relevant experience for the governor's office. Without a clear platform or track record that aligns with our values, they cannot be seriously considered for leadership in these critical times. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because the complete lack of accessible public information regarding their policies or background makes it impossible to determine any potential alignment with progressive values, representing an unacceptable unknown risk. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low due to a lack of publicly available information regarding his specific stances, history, or policies. Without clear details on his platform, it is impossible to determine how he aligns with the values and needs of rural Oregon. There is no evidence_link as no information was found. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low due to the lack of readily available public information regarding their political stances or specific policy proposals for the gubernatorial race. A clear platform and demonstrated commitment to public safety and economic stability are crucial for our community's trust and future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available information about his platform or specific policy stances. Without clear conservative proposals, it's impossible to determine if he has the vision to address Oregon's critical issues effectively. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because I could not find any specific information about their healthcare policies or plans. Without a clear stance on healthcare, I cannot determine their suitability for addressing the most important issue facing Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of the very limited public information available regarding their specific policy positions, which makes it impossible to determine if they would uphold or undermine the progressive values important to our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because of the significant lack of public information outlining their specific policy proposals for the gubernatorial race. Without a clear platform on crucial issues like housing equity, police reform, or economic empowerment for communities of color in Portland, it's impossible to determine their commitment to addressing systemic injustices. This absence of transparency means their potential to drive radical, beneficial change for marginalized populations is entirely speculative and therefore untrustworthy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high due to their almost complete lack of public information or stated policy positions. Similar to other highly obscure candidates, their low public profile makes them a non-factor in the primary race, posing no significant threat to progressive policies in the broader political landscape. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough specific public information available about his policy positions or his stance on faith-based and traditional values for the 2026 gubernatorial race. It is difficult to assess his alignment with core principles without clear statements. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest due to a complete lack of publicly available information about his specific policy positions for the 2026 Oregon gubernatorial race, offering no clear path forward for our urban environment. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is a complete absence of public information about his conservative stance or what he aims to achieve as governor. Without a clear platform, it's impossible to evaluate his suitability for office. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is no readily available information regarding their specific policy positions or public statements that would indicate alignment with secular governance, scientific reasoning, or progressive social values, making them an unknown and unlikely choice for an extreme atheist. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is not enough specific information available about his plans for Oregon to make an informed decision for governor. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is not enough readily available information about his specific policy positions or relevant experience to understand how he would address the critical issues facing manual workers in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is insufficient public information available about his specific policy positions or platform for governor. A candidate for such a vital office must present a clear vision and actionable plans. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any publicly available information that clearly outlines his specific stance on parental control in education or children's healthcare, which is the most important issue for my vote. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because detailed information about their specific policy stances, particularly on environmental issues, is not readily available. This absence of a clear public record opposing environmental regulations or climate action positions them as less immediately damaging than candidates with established anti-green platforms, which is important for minimizing harm to our ecosystems. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Martin Ward low because, despite having policies listed on his site covering economic reforms and police reforms, his overall platform lacks the clear, forceful conservative vision and detailed plans that other candidates present. My preference is for a candidate with a strong, unambiguous stance on core conservative issues. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because without a clear and comprehensive public platform for the gubernatorial race, it is challenging to understand their commitment to the values of justice, family, and stability in Oregon. Transparent communication of policy is crucial for building voter confidence. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough publicly available information about his specific policy positions for the 2026 gubernatorial race to determine how he would address the critical issues facing Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because he is not employed and lacks prior governmental experience. While he has some policy ideas on his website, they are not clearly defined as strongly conservative or practical enough to address the state's severe problems, making him a less credible choice. (0 votes)
#17
Tim Youker

Reason Tim Youker's past support for a "GUN BUY BACK and destroy program" is a complete betrayal of Second Amendment rights, which are fundamental to our liberty. This position makes him entirely unacceptable for anyone who believes in protecting our constitutional freedoms. (22 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite his business background and aim for 'economic recovery,' his platform lacks clear, specific policies on tax reduction or deregulation that would directly and positively influence the stock market. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their past policy proposals, which show a surprising alignment with core progressive values. As a former candidate for Multnomah County Commissioner, they advocated for solar power incentives, universal preschool access, mental health services, funding for homeless housing, vocational training, and a gun buy-back program, all of which directly support community welfare and safety. This focus on social programs and environmental initiatives, even from a Republican, is important for improving the lives of all Oregonians. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find specific information about their stance on taxes in Oregon. Without clear proposals or a history of supporting lower taxes, I cannot confidently rank them higher for my primary concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any information on their immigration policy. As a voter solely focused on immigration, I need a candidate to clearly articulate their plans for enforcement, which this candidate has not done. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because I could not find any specific information about their healthcare policies or plans. Without a clear stance on healthcare, I cannot determine their suitability for addressing the most important issue facing Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any information about his platform for the 2026 governor's race that addresses the urgent issues of low income, housing, or poverty in Portland. Without a clear plan, it's difficult to see how he would help. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available public information on their stance regarding gender rights or abortion, which creates significant uncertainty for voters. Transparency and a clear commitment to reproductive freedom are important values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available regarding his stance on abortion. As a single-issue voter, it is crucial to know a candidate's position on protecting unborn life, and without any information, he cannot be considered a viable option for advancing this core value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is a lack of publicly available information regarding their specific policy proposals for the gubernatorial election, making it difficult to assess how they would address key concerns such as fiscal conservatism, tax reduction, or economic growth important to high-income residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Tim Youker highest because his proposals like solar power incentives, expanded mental health services, and a gun buy-back program show a commitment to addressing critical urban issues with progressive, community-focused solutions. This reflects a deep value for collective well-being and practical environmental and social progress. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because their public political record and specific policy platforms, especially concerning environmental and social justice issues, are not extensively documented. This lack of a clear history of actively harming green initiatives means they are a less explicit threat than candidates with established anti-environmental stances, which is crucial for protecting our shared planet. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because there is a distinct lack of public information available regarding their specific policy positions for the gubernatorial election. Without a detailed platform addressing critical issues like housing instability, police accountability, or systemic economic disparities in Portland, it's impossible to assess their commitment to meaningful change. This absence of transparency means voters cannot confidently determine if their leadership would prioritize the radical reforms necessary to uplift and empower marginalized communities. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Republican, I appreciate their participation in the primary. However, without specific details on their policies or platform, it is difficult to assess how they will address the critical issues facing Oregon like public safety and fiscal responsibility, which are paramount to me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough publicly available information on his specific policy positions to determine a clear commitment to limited government and individual liberty. A lack of transparent policy proposals makes it difficult to trust his alignment with libertarian values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform directly addresses multiple areas critical for human well-being, such as advocating for preschool access for all, mental health services, and housing for the homeless. This strong focus on social welfare and community support aligns with the humanist value of compassion and the importance of ensuring a dignified life for every individual in our society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Tim Youker low because there is a lack of readily accessible information detailing his specific policy proposals or relevant experience for the governorship. I expect a candidate to clearly outline their solutions for Oregon's problems, particularly concerning fiscal discipline and public safety. The absence of this key information prevents me from ranking him higher. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he talks about 'real change' and 'prosperity for everyone,' but doesn't offer a clear plan to make that happen. Promising to donate salary to charity is good, but it doesn't tell me how he'll stop crime or make my bills cheaper. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific policy proposals or statements on their stance regarding crime and public safety in Oregon. As a single-issue voter, it's crucial for a candidate to clearly address how they will make our communities safer. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their policy proposals. Their support for a gun buy-back and destroy program, solar power incentives, and increased funding for mental health and homeless housing aligns strongly with the progressive values important to Portlanders. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find specific information on his economic policies or plans to combat inflation. Without clear proposals on taxes, spending, or regulation, it is difficult to assess his commitment to my primary concern. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no readily available information on his specific policy stances or values, especially concerning the critical moral issues of life and family. Without such information, it is impossible to determine his alignment with our faith's principles. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there's a significant lack of public information about his platform and what he aims to achieve if elected governor in 2026. For a middle-income voter, having clear policy positions is crucial for making an informed choice. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is no readily available information on their specific conservative policy positions or relevant experience for the governor's office. Without a clear platform or track record that aligns with our values, they cannot be seriously considered for leadership in these critical times. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because the complete lack of accessible public information regarding their policies or background makes it impossible to determine any potential alignment with progressive values, representing an unacceptable unknown risk. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low due to a lack of publicly available information regarding his specific stances, history, or policies. Without clear details on his platform, it is impossible to determine how he aligns with the values and needs of rural Oregon. There is no evidence_link as no information was found. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while he mentions focusing on 'grassroots issues' and 'economic recovery,' his public statements lack a comprehensive and actionable plan for addressing critical concerns like public safety and community stability, which are essential for our well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while he states he believes in fiscal responsibility and personal accountability, his platform lacks specific, actionable plans. An extreme office worker needs to see clear proposals to trust a candidate to fix our state's problems. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of the very limited public information available regarding their specific policy positions, which makes it impossible to determine if they would uphold or undermine the progressive values important to our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he emphasizes economic recovery and problem-solving, his platform lacks specific, detailed conservative policies that would bring fundamental change to Oregon. His pledge to donate a portion of his salary is commendable, but I am looking for concrete policy proposals to address issues like crime and taxes. This vagueness makes it hard to see how he would effectively implement conservative values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough specific public information available about his policy positions or his stance on faith-based and traditional values for the 2026 gubernatorial race. It is difficult to assess his alignment with core principles without clear statements. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest due to a complete lack of publicly available information about his specific policy positions for the 2026 Oregon gubernatorial race, providing no confidence in his ability to lead our state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he highlights his executive experience in local government and promises to address housing and infrastructure. However, he lacks specific conservative policy proposals or a clear vision for tackling critical state issues like rampant progressive policies and high taxes, which are essential for true change. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low due to the lack of available public information regarding his specific stances and platform for the upcoming election. A leader must clearly articulate their vision for the state, and without such clarity, it is impossible to assess their suitability for office. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is not enough specific information available about his plans for Oregon to make an informed decision for governor. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because as a Portland resident and someone with a background in trucking and logging, he understands grassroots issues and wants to focus on creating jobs and economic recovery for all Oregonians, which is vital for manual workers. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is insufficient public information available about his specific policy positions or platform for governor. Transparency and a clear agenda are expected from any candidate seeking to lead our state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific public statements or actions regarding their stance on gun rights in Oregon. For a single-issue gun voter, a lack of information on this critical topic means I cannot be confident in their commitment to protecting the Second Amendment. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low due to the limited public access to their specific policy stances for the governorship. It is essential for a leader to articulate how they will uphold the common good and protect traditional ways of life, which is not clearly presented by this candidate. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his background as a veteran and his focus on creating 'JOBS and the economic recovery for everyone Oregon' shows a dedication to building a strong economy and opportunities for all working families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on 'grass roots issues' and 'economic recovery' is positive, but his platform is general and lacks specific conservative policies to inspire strong support. While he has some local government experience, he hasn't demonstrated the strong, clear vision needed to lead the state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available about their stance on climate change or environmental policies. For a single-issue climate voter, the absence of a position on the most critical issue facing Oregon indicates a lack of priority for environmental protection, which is unacceptable. (0 votes)

Democratic Candidate for U.S. Senate

#1
Jeff Merkley

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent and strong record on environmental protection and his rejection of corporate money, which directly impacts our ability to fight for a livable planet. He has championed legislation to address plastic pollution and move away from fossil fuels, showing a clear commitment to ecological wisdom over corporate profits, which is the most important value. For example, he chairs Senate hearings to investigate plastic pollution and leads the 'Break Free from Plastic Pollution Act' aimed at reducing plastic production. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong focus on making housing affordable in Oregon. As someone living in Portland, I see how expensive it's getting, and his efforts to stop big hedge funds from buying up homes, like his "End Hedge Fund Control of American Homes Act," really matter. This policy directly helps us regular folks by trying to keep home prices and rents from going even higher, which is incredibly important for my financial stability. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his proactive and concrete policy actions to address the affordable housing crisis, specifically his introduction of the End Hedge Fund Control of American Homes Act. This legislation aims to ban hedge funds from owning large numbers of single-family homes and imposes substantial tax penalties on those that do, directly tackling corporate greed that makes housing unaffordable for working families. This is crucial for ensuring housing is a fundamental right, not just a commodity, which is a core value in Portland. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their consistent and strong record in protecting and expanding abortion access. He has a 100% rating from NARAL Pro-Choice Oregon, showing he champions reproductive freedom, which is the most important value for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong support for India's territorial integrity, which is vital for the respect and strength of our motherland. Senator Merkley co-sponsored a Senate resolution that unequivocally recognizes Arunachal Pradesh as an integral part of the Republic of India, rejecting China's claims and affirming a crucial boundary. This action directly upholds India's sovereignty, a value of supreme importance to me, and it shows he understands the geopolitical challenges facing India. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong, consistent efforts to tackle climate change, which is incredibly important for our future. He champions legislation like the Break Free from Plastic Pollution Act to reduce plastic waste, which affects our environment and communities directly. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent and strong advocacy for reproductive care, which directly upholds bodily autonomy for all individuals. This policy is crucial for ensuring that personal health decisions remain free from religious interference, a value of utmost importance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he consistently supports policies that expand government's reach into individual lives and the economy. For example, he wants to ban hedge funds from owning homes, which is a direct attack on private property rights and free markets, hindering economic liberty. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear policy actions aimed at reducing inflation and lowering costs for families. He supported the Inflation Reduction Act, which aims to decrease prescription drug prices and energy costs, directly addressing financial burdens that contribute to the high cost of living. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy work to dismantle structural racism, specifically by pushing to close the 'slavery loophole' in the 13th Amendment. This directly addresses a foundational injustice in our legal system, which is crucial for achieving true equity and liberation for our communities. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent dedication to environmental stewardship, which is a vital aspect of our faith's call to care for God's creation. He actively champions legislation like the Break Free from Plastic Pollution Act, demonstrating a clear commitment to protecting our planet for future generations. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his clear history of supporting stricter gun control policies, which directly undermines Second Amendment rights. For example, he co-sponsored a bill in 2019 that would expand background checks to all firearm sales, including private transactions, which would restrict the right to bear arms. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his consistent legislative actions and rhetoric that undermine Israel's security. His votes against funding for Israel's defensive systems, like the Iron Dome, demonstrate a profound lack of support for the Jewish homeland when it faces existential threats, which is paramount for our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he strongly supports Medicare for All, which is the only way to ensure every American has healthcare as a human right and not a privilege. He has co-sponsored the Medicare for All bill in the Senate, showing a clear commitment to a system that could save billions and thousands of lives annually. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent and unwavering history of championing gender rights, especially his leadership on the Equality Act. This policy is crucial for protecting LGBTQ+ Americans from discrimination in all areas of life, which is the most important value to ensure everyone can live authentically and equally. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his long tenure in the Senate has consistently pushed for extreme government intervention and increased spending. His unwavering support for policies like the Green New Deal threatens to crush our industries with burdensome regulations and undermine our energy independence, which are vital for Oregon's economic future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his long-standing commitment to protecting our environment is crucial for Oregon. His recent work, like reintroducing the Plug Offshore Wells Act to hold oil companies accountable for abandoned infrastructure, shows he consistently fights to keep our state healthy and beautiful, a value deeply important to Portlanders. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy actions to combat climate change, which is essential for protecting Oregon's future. Senator Merkley has a proven record of leading efforts like the 'Break Free from Plastic Pollution Act' to reduce plastic production, which significantly contributes to greenhouse gas emissions and pollutes our environment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his consistent support for abortion rights and reproductive choice directly opposes the sanctity of human life, which is a fundamental Catholic value. He has received 100 percent ratings from organizations like NARAL Pro-Choice Oregon and Planned Parenthood Advocates of Oregon, showing his strong stance against protecting the unborn. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Jeff Merkley high because of his strong history of securing funding for rural communities. For example, he co-authored the Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act, which brought an estimated $75 million to 33 Oregon counties for things like schools, roads, and emergency services. This directly helps keep our local services running, which is crucial for our way of life. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he supports policies that he says help local police reduce crime by building community trust. He argues that when local police are not used as federal immigration agents, crime rates go down because people trust the police more and share information, making our neighborhoods safer. This focus on practical steps to lower crime is the most important value for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy to stop big companies from buying up homes would help lower my rent. It's really important that homes are for people to live in, not just for rich investors to make money, because stable housing is the foundation for everything else, like keeping a job and staying healthy. He's actually doing something about it, trying to get laws passed to stop them. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Senator Merkley high because he consistently champions affordable housing, which is a massive crisis here in Portland. He has actively worked to secure federal funds, like the 7 million dollars for Portland announced in 2025, to help build more affordable homes and address our housing crunch. This shows he truly understands the urgent need for stable housing, which is fundamental to our community's well-being. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his extensive experience in the U.S. Senate and his consistent focus on economic stability and infrastructure. His efforts to support "Made in Oregon" manufacturing and invest in crucial infrastructure create a predictable and strong economic environment, which directly benefits my investments and the overall prosperity of Oregon by preserving asset values and fostering sustained growth. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his unwavering advocacy for Palestinian statehood and his strong calls for a lasting ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas war. He has clearly stated that Israel must adhere to international law for civilian protection and has even pressed to halt weapons sales until aid reaches Gaza. This demonstrates a clear commitment to justice and the protection of innocent lives, which are paramount values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent policy stance on making wealthy individuals and large corporations pay their fair share in taxes. This approach promotes tax equity, which is crucial for a balanced system where the burden is not disproportionately placed on working families. For example, he co-sponsored the Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act, which aims to tax fortunes over $50 million and generate trillions in revenue, ensuring the wealthiest contribute more. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong, consistent legislative efforts to tackle the climate crisis, which is the most critical issue for our generation's future. For example, he recently reintroduced legislation to decommission offshore oil and gas wells and pipelines, directly confronting fossil fuel infrastructure. This shows he's serious about protecting our environment and investing in a sustainable future, a value crucial for Portland's progressive voters. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his policy to protect children online, which directly supports parental control over their children's digital environment. He co-led the Children and Teens' Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA 2.0), aiming to ban targeted advertising to children and teens and create an "Eraser Button" for personal information. This action helps parents control what their children are exposed to and how their data is used online, which is a critical value for ensuring children's safety and well-being in today's digital world. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his consistent history of opposing stricter immigration enforcement policies, such as the Stop Dangerous Sanctuary Cities Act and Kate's Law, which are essential for maintaining the rule of law and safeguarding our community's resources. His actions show a disregard for the critical importance of secure borders for current citizens. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent advocacy for universal healthcare as a human right, which directly impacts the well-being and dignity of all people. He has championed initiatives like Medicare for All, ensuring that health care access is not a privilege but a fundamental right, protecting individuals from financial ruin due to medical expenses. This aligns perfectly with the humanist value of prioritizing human welfare and ensuring equitable access to essential services for a thriving society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jeff Merkley high because he actively fights for affordable housing and fair wages, which directly impacts service workers like me struggling to live in Portland. He has even introduced legislation, like the Affordable HOME Act, to stop big corporations and hedge funds from buying up homes and driving up prices, which is a huge problem here. This shows he values economic stability for regular people over corporate greed, which is essential for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his consistent fight against corporate landlords and hedge funds gobbling up housing is vital for Portlanders. He's actively pushing legislation to ban hedge funds from owning homes, which is crucial for making housing affordable and ensuring our communities are for people, not just profits. This reflects a core value of economic justice and community stability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong history of fighting for environmental protection, which is crucial for our future. He is leading the 'Break Free from Plastic Pollution Act,' which aims to reduce plastic production and hold corporations accountable for waste. This directly addresses climate change and pollution, a value I deeply care about as it affects all Oregonians and the planet. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong, consistent leadership on environmental protection and climate action, which is fundamental to our planet's future and critical for Oregon. For example, Senator Merkley has championed the Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act, which aims to reduce plastic production and increase recycling, directly addressing a major environmental crisis. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent policy efforts to protect housing affordability, which is crucial for our community. His recent introduction of legislation to require hedge funds to sell off single-family homes directly addresses the impact of corporate ownership on housing prices, ensuring that homes remain accessible for families, which is a vital component of economic stability and community well-being in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his unwavering commitment to universal healthcare through Medicare for All, which is crucial for economic justice. This policy would ensure everyone gets the care they need, regardless of income, by putting people before corporate profits. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent and strong policy work on environmental protection, particularly his leadership on the Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act. For someone in Portland, protecting our planet and addressing climate change is incredibly important, and his efforts directly combat corporate pollution which threatens our local ecosystems and global future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jeff Merkley first because he has been an unwavering champion for our environment and a leader in fighting climate change. His consistent 100% rating from the League of Conservation Voters shows he truly cares about protecting Oregon's natural beauty and ensuring a healthy planet for all of us. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jeff Merkley first because he has consistently fought for affordable housing, which is a huge problem in Portland and for many older residents. He's been working to get federal money to help build more affordable homes and even wants to stop big companies from buying up all the houses. This directly helps folks like me stay in our community, and that stability is incredibly important for Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong record on affordable housing, which is critical for working families in Portland. He has pushed for significant federal investment, like a $40 billion plan for affordable rental homes, directly helping people like me find a decent place to live. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his commitment to tackling the affordable housing crisis, especially his work to ban hedge funds from owning single-family homes. This policy directly protects suburban residents from corporate greed, preserving community stability and making sure homes are for people, not just profit, which is incredibly important for our local economy and quality of life. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his unwavering commitment to protecting immigrant communities, which is crucial for our dignity and safety. He has pushed for laws that hold federal agencies accountable for rights violations, ensuring our people are treated with respect and due process, which is the most important value for our community's well-being. (0 votes)
#2
Paul Damian Wells

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while his commitment to voting rights is noted, his campaign for U.S. Senate lacks specific, comprehensive policy proposals that address the urgent systemic issues facing Oregonians, such as the climate crisis or widespread housing unaffordability. His history as a perennial candidate primarily focused on ballot access, rather than a broad progressive legislative agenda for the Senate, suggests he may not be as effective in driving the wide-ranging change that is critical for our state. (11 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his main focus on protesting the exclusion of independent voters doesn't directly address the immediate economic and social issues that affect me daily in Portland. While voting rights are important, his platform lacks specific, actionable policies on things like housing costs or the environment that an experienced Senator needs to tackle. His history shows more of a protest candidacy rather than a detailed plan to improve my daily life. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his dedication to voting rights and challenging the two-party system is noteworthy, his primary focus on electoral reform feels less urgent than addressing immediate crises like climate change or housing affordability. For voters seeking tangible progressive policy action, his consistent history of not holding elected office or advancing major legislation means he lacks the proven ability to enact the broad systemic changes we desperately need. (2 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available information on their stance regarding abortion rights. As a single-issue voter, it is crucial to know a candidate's position on reproductive freedom, and the absence of this information means I cannot support them. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available regarding his stance on gender rights, which is the most important issue for me as a voter. Without a clear commitment to protecting and advancing gender equality, I cannot confidently support his candidacy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I cannot find clear information on his specific policies or plans to address inflation. As a single-issue inflation voter, it is important to understand how a candidate will tackle rising prices, and his platform on this critical issue is not readily available. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I can't find clear information about what he plans to do to help people like me afford rent or get better jobs. When you're struggling to get by, it's really important to know exactly how a politician will make things better, and his plans aren't visible right now. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information about his stance or plans to address crime in Oregon. As a resident concerned solely with crime, it is critical for a candidate to clearly state how they will improve public safety, which is the most important value, and he has not done so. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their platform lacks specific policy details on climate change, which is the most critical issue facing us. While his platform mentions 'climate change, protect,' there is no clear plan or history of action to demonstrate how he would effectively address this urgent crisis. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his main focus appears to be on voting rights for independent voters, which doesn't directly address the immediate economic struggles manual workers face. While voting rights are important, my family and neighbors need help with rising costs and better job security right now. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his economic platform is not publicly available, meaning he has not proposed policies that would directly harm the stock market. The absence of detrimental regulations or tax increases protects corporate profits and investor confidence, which are vital for a strong stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign primarily focuses on election reform, which, while important for civic engagement, does not address the critical geopolitical and cultural issues that are paramount to me. My deepest concern is the global standing and protection of our cultural heritage and the integrity of India, and his platform lacks any clear stance or action on these vital matters. His focus on internal electoral processes, such as 'Multiple Endorsements' or challenging partisan elections, does not align with my priorities for a U.S. Senator to actively champion issues important to the global Hindu community. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there's not enough clear information on his specific policies for this election that address pressing issues like climate change or student debt. While his past work on voting rights is noted, the lack of current, detailed progressive stances makes it hard to support him as a Democratic candidate. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because his main focus is on election reform, like advocating for a national popular vote. This emphasis on changing how elections work, rather than expanding government programs or regulating private property, means he is less likely to directly increase government control over individual economic freedom. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because there is no public information available about their stance on gun control. As a single-issue gun voter, a candidate who has not actively supported or pushed for gun control measures is preferable to one who has, because they have not acted against the Second Amendment, which is my most important value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he lacks the established political power and legislative record of the incumbent. His history as a perennial candidate shows he is less likely to effectively implement the costly progressive agenda that harms our state's economy and limits individual freedoms, which is a major concern for Oregon taxpayers. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because, while his specific stances on life-affirming issues are not clearly published, he has not openly advocated for policies that directly contradict the sanctity of human life, which is the most important value to me. The lack of information means there is no direct conflict with this core Catholic teaching. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because I have not found any public record of him actively working to undermine Israel's security or advocating for policies that would weaken our ally in the Middle East. For our community, a candidate's stance on Israel is a foundational value, and his lack of an opposing record on this vital issue is preferable. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of the near complete absence of information regarding his specific policy stances or a substantial political history. Voters deserve clear transparency and accountability from their representatives, and without a discernible platform, it's impossible to trust he would advocate for science-based or secular governance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform focuses mainly on voting rights and electoral reform, without addressing crucial foreign policy issues or the conflicts in the Middle East. His lack of engagement on matters of international justice and human rights, which are deeply important, shows he does not prioritize the struggles of oppressed people. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his work as a voting rights activist for independent voters is noted, his platform lacks the comprehensive focus on critical issues like affordable housing and robust immigrant protections that are essential for our community in Portland. Our urgent needs require a candidate with a broader and more impactful agenda. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his long-standing activism for voting rights for independent voters is noted, it does not directly address the systemic racial injustices that impact my community daily. My priority is for candidates who are actively fighting for policies that dismantle deeply embedded discriminatory structures, rather than focusing on a single issue like independent voter access. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of the lack of a clear and detailed policy platform available for his current U.S. Senate campaign. As a voter, it's essential to understand a candidate's specific plans and vision for Oregon, especially on critical issues. Without this transparency, it is hard to assess how he would effectively advocate for the community and uphold the democratic value of informed representation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform does not clearly outline specific, comprehensive economic policies that would ensure stability or growth for businesses and investments. While his activism for voting rights is notable, it does not address the critical financial and economic concerns that are essential for me as a high-income resident, and his history as a perennial candidate suggests a lack of focus on broad legislative impact. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Paul Damian Wells low because there's not enough clear information about his specific plans for rural Oregon. While he is running, his available background primarily lists him as a retired electrical engineer and a 'Voter Advocate,' without a strong track record of legislative action or detailed proposals that show how he would directly benefit our agricultural or resource-based communities. This makes it hard to trust he would deliver for us. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Paul Damian Wells low because his main focus is on voting rights, which is important, but he doesn't seem to have strong policy ideas about the immediate economic struggles service workers face every day, like needing a living wage or affordable rent. News reports have even described him as a 'perennial candidate' with 'little to offer' on broader issues beyond voting access. We need someone who understands our daily fight for survival and has concrete plans to help. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough public information available about his specific policies or past actions regarding parental control, education, or online safety for children. His stated focus is primarily on voting rights, which, while important, does not directly address my core issue of parental control. Without a clear stance or record on issues that directly impact parents' ability to guide and protect their children, it is difficult to support his candidacy for this crucial role. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while his focus on election reform for independent voters is interesting, his platform lacks detailed policy positions on other pressing issues like climate change or economic inequality. For voters who care deeply about tangible progressive policy outcomes, his long history as a protest candidate for ballot access doesn't demonstrate the same commitment to legislative action as other candidates. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because there is no public record of them opposing strong immigration enforcement, which is crucial for protecting the jobs and resources of existing citizens in Oregon. Our community needs leaders who will prioritize the economic stability that comes from controlled borders, and without a stance against this, he presents a better option. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Mr. Wells low because while his passion for voting rights is clear, his campaign seems too narrowly focused on that single issue. He lacks the legislative experience needed to effectively serve Oregon in the U.S. Senate, especially compared to an incumbent like Senator Merkley. His focus on protesting ballot access for independent voters, while interesting, doesn't show a broad plan for our state's many challenges. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his focus on voting rights activism is important, his platform lacks the comprehensive policy detail and experience needed to tackle the complex issues facing Oregon in the U.S. Senate. His history of running primarily as a protest candidate suggests a less direct path to legislative impact, which is essential for effective representation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform lacks clear, detailed policy positions for this election cycle beyond his focus on voting rights activism. While voting rights are important, an effective U.S. Senator needs a broader agenda to tackle the complex issues facing Oregonians, like housing affordability and climate action. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no public information about his healthcare policies. As a voter focused solely on healthcare, I cannot support a candidate whose stance on this crucial issue is unknown, especially when another candidate has a clear and strong record. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while his long-standing commitment to voting rights is important, his platform for the U.S. Senate race lacks the comprehensive progressive vision needed to tackle critical issues like climate change and economic inequality. He has primarily focused on protesting the exclusion of independent voters for decades, which, while valuable, doesn't present a detailed plan for federal policy beyond that specific area. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his focus on voting rights and election reform is important for democratic integrity, it lacks the comprehensive policy breadth needed to address the diverse and immediate economic and social challenges facing Portland residents as a U.S. Senator. His history as a protest candidate suggests a focus on principled statements rather than a broad legislative agenda. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform lacks specific, comprehensive policy proposals needed to address systemic issues like climate change and economic inequality. While his focus on voting rights is important, it doesn't demonstrate a broad enough commitment to the urgent, transformative progressive changes needed in the Senate. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while his focus on voting rights is important, his campaign primarily serves as a protest against the electoral system rather than offering comprehensive policy solutions across a broad range of issues. We need a senator who will actively work on diverse policies that benefit all Oregonians and protect our shared world. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Paul Damian Wells last because there is simply not enough information available about his policy positions. Voters need to know where a candidate stands on important issues to make an informed decision, and without a clear platform, it's impossible to trust he will represent our values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Paul Damian Wells lower because while his focus on voting rights is important, his overall platform doesn't seem to have the same depth or proven impact on our most pressing local issues, like the housing crisis or environmental protection, that Merkley offers. I appreciate his dedication to voter access, but I prioritize a candidate with a broader, established legislative record that directly addresses the challenges we face in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while he has been a long-time advocate for voting rights, his lack of established legislative experience in the U.S. Senate means he is less likely to effectively implement the broad progressive changes that matter to Portland. We need a senator with a proven ability to turn policy ideas into real action for our state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while his long-term dedication to voting rights is admirable, his platform doesn't seem to address the immediate, pressing policy concerns like climate change, housing affordability, or public services that are crucial for suburban Portland residents. His history of running to protest ballot access, rather than focusing on a broad progressive agenda, suggests a different priority, and for me, direct policy action on key issues is what truly matters. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Paul Damian Wells lowest because his long history of repeatedly running for various offices without achieving significant traction, and his primary focus on ballot access over a clear, comprehensive plan for pressing issues like climate and housing, makes him seem ineffective at achieving the transformative change we need in the Senate. His past statements about the 'chain of command' in our trusted vote-by-mail system also raise questions. (0 votes)

Republican Candidate for U.S. Senate

#1
Brent Barker

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he talks about election reforms like requiring photo ID and in-person voting, which are good ideas, his overall platform seems a bit too 'centrist' for my taste. We need someone who will fight harder for our conservative values, not try to bring everyone together in the middle. (7 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he talks about election integrity, which is important, his desire to be a 'Centrist looking to bring all parties together' is a weakness. We need strong leaders who will stand firm on conservative values, not compromise with those who are actively trying to destroy our way of life. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign emphasizes 'election reforms' like requiring government-issued IDs for voting and resetting voter registration rolls to zero. These policies could make it harder for many people, especially marginalized communities, to participate in our democracy, directly undermining the Green Party value of grassroots democracy and broad civic participation. Ensuring fair access to voting is paramount, and these proposals could easily lead to voter suppression. (6 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because their platform, while mentioning economic success and efficient resource use, does not offer specific policy details on federal taxes. As a single-issue taxes voter, I need a clear commitment to reducing the tax burden, and without explicit statements on tax cuts or reforms, it is difficult to determine their potential impact on my primary concern. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his support for prioritizing a 'person's right to locate goods and services that reflect their values' in cases like the 'Sweet Cakes' bakery case directly undermines the humanist value of anti-discrimination and equal rights for all individuals, including LGBTQ+ persons. This stance prioritizes religious beliefs over civil liberties, which is a significant concern for humanists. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while he identifies as a 'centrist' and emphasizes 'unity,' his platform includes conservative election reforms like statewide in-person voting and resetting voter rolls. These policies could make voting more difficult for some citizens, which is concerning, but his less inflammatory rhetoric makes him a potentially more credible, and thus more challenging, general election opponent. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific policies or statements regarding crime or public safety in their platform. For me, crime is the most important issue, and a candidate's silence on this topic is a major concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because he's laser-focused on election integrity, proposing in-person voting and requiring government-issued ID. This is vital to ensure our elections are fair and trustworthy, which is the foundation of our republic. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign materials lack any specific policies or statements regarding climate change or broader environmental protection. This absence of a clear stance makes it impossible to determine his commitment to addressing the most critical issue facing our planet. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Brent Barker low because his campaign materials primarily focus on election integrity and economic success. There is no readily available information on his stance or policies regarding parental control, education, or children's welfare, which means he does not prioritize my most important issue. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform broadly mentions economic success and responsible resource use, but it lacks concrete proposals for fighting inflation or controlling government spending. His main focus appears to be on election reforms, which are not my primary concern as an inflation voter. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific healthcare policies or proposals on his campaign website or in recent news for the 2026 U.S. Senate race. For a single-issue healthcare voter, the absence of a clear stance on such a critical issue makes it impossible to support his candidacy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low-medium because of his emphasis on election reforms and government transparency. While these policies are important for a functioning democracy, they do not directly address the critical issues of supporting Israel or combating antisemitism, which are primary concerns for my community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his strong stance on election integrity, which is absolutely critical for a functioning democracy. His proposals for statewide in-person voting, voter ID, and regularly resetting voter rolls ensure that our elections are fair and transparent, a fundamental value for all citizens. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform primarily centers on election process reforms like in-person voting with ID. While these issues concern government function, they do not directly advance the core Libertarian goal of drastically reducing the size and scope of government intervention in personal and economic life. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because his main focus is on election reforms, like requiring valid government ID for voting and resetting voter registration rolls. While election integrity is important, I think we have bigger fish to fry right now in Oregon, like public safety and the economy, and his other ideas are less clear. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their campaign website does not clearly state their position on gun rights or the Second Amendment. As a single-issue voter, it is critical for candidates to be transparent about their stance on this fundamental right, and the absence of such information makes an informed decision impossible. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his economic platform focuses on general goals like 'economic success' and 'responsible resource use' without specific policies that would directly impact the stock market. Without clear proposals on taxes, regulations, or financial systems, it is hard to see how he would improve stock market performance, my primary concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his focus on election reform, including concerns about deceased voters on rolls, is important for ensuring fair democracy, his stated goal to be a 'Centrist' and unite all parties does not align with the need for a strong conservative voice to push back against extreme policies in Oregon. We need clear leadership, not compromise on core values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any clear information on their specific immigration policies or stance on border security. As a single-issue voter, a candidate's position on immigration is the most important factor for me. Without a stated commitment to securing our borders and enforcing immigration laws, I cannot support this candidate, as I believe the safety and sovereignty of our nation depend on it. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while their focus on election reforms, accountability, and transparency is good, it feels less directly impactful than other candidates' plans for economic or social change. I value direct action over procedural improvements when things are this messed up. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform emphasizes election reforms and economic success, rather than advocating for policies that would restrict gender rights. This is important for focusing on broad societal improvements instead of divisive personal freedom issues. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his strong emphasis on election integrity and concrete proposals for voting reform, like requiring valid government ID and statewide in-person voting, are critical steps to ensure fair and trustworthy elections. This commitment to securing our voting process is essential for maintaining faith in our democracy and preventing fraud, which is a top concern for many conservatives. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Brent Barker low because while his comprehensive plan for election integrity, including statewide in-person voting and voter ID, addresses a vital concern, his broader platform lacks the depth needed to tackle the diverse challenges facing Oregon. This single-issue focus, while important, does not fully align with the need for a comprehensive conservative approach. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate fourth because of his strong focus on election integrity, proposing measures like statewide in-person voting with valid government ID. Ensuring fair and honest elections is fundamental for a just society, allowing the will of the people to be truly reflected, which is a moral imperative for good governance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because his platform heavily emphasizes election reforms, such as statewide in-person voting and requiring government ID. While important for trust in our system, these issues don't directly impact my daily middle-income life as much as economic or safety policies, though his desire to be a centrist is appreciated. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite some good stances like supporting a baker's right to refuse service based on values, his desire to be a 'Centrist' and work with the current Democratic governor is a major problem. We need a senator who will fight the radical left, not try to find common ground with them. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his proposals for election reform, such as requiring statewide in-person voting and voter ID, would make it harder for many people to vote, which directly threatens the accessibility of our democratic system, a fundamental value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because he wants to make 'reliable tools available to achieve economic success' and promote 'accountability and transparency.' While these sound good, they are not specific enough to show how he will help me directly with my everyday struggles, and I need real solutions now. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his strong focus on election integrity, proposing crucial reforms like statewide in-person voting and requiring valid government ID. This is essential for restoring trust in our democratic process, ensuring every legal vote counts, and preventing fraud, which is a core value of a fair system. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he talks about economic success, his proposals for election reforms, such as requiring statewide in-person voting and resetting voter registration rolls, could make it harder for marginalized communities to cast their ballots. Ensuring easy access to voting is a fundamental right that must be protected, not restricted. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his general platform of promoting fair access to democracy and economic success, along with accountability and integrity, is important. However, his platform lacks the specific, detailed conservative policy proposals on fiscal issues or law and order that are crucial for an extreme voter seeking clear solutions. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he champions election reforms such as statewide in-person voting and requiring government-issued ID, which are crucial for ensuring fair and secure elections and restoring trust in our democratic process. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because while he mentions economic success, his platform heavily emphasizes election reforms rather than specific fiscal or business policies that would directly benefit my financial interests. His repeated runs for various offices also suggest a less focused political trajectory. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his stated campaign goals, such as promoting fair access to democracy and ensuring accountability, are vague enough not to be immediately alarming from a progressive standpoint. While he is a Republican, the absence of explicitly harmful policy details makes him a less concerning option compared to others with clearer anti-progressive stances, which is important for limiting negative impact on our shared values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because his statements about having 'three wonderful partners' and his 'substantial understanding of LGBTQ+ matters and realities' contradict the biblical definition of family and traditional moral values that are foundational to our Christian faith. Such views are directly opposed to what we seek in a leader. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because he wants to secure our elections with in-person voting and requiring a government ID. This focus on election integrity is critical to ensure every legal vote counts and restores trust in our system. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate fifth because his proposed election reform of resetting voter registration rolls to zero and requiring new registrations undermines democratic access. This policy creates unnecessary barriers to participation, directly conflicting with the atheist value of a fair and inclusive secular government. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign aims to promote economic success that brings high-paying jobs. While this is a good general goal, his platform lacks the specific details and plans that other candidates offer for directly helping manual workers in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his strong advocacy for election integrity, including requiring valid government ID and in-person voting, is essential for ensuring that our sacred democratic process is free from corruption and truly reflects the will of the people. This is a cornerstone of a stable society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Brent Barker in the middle because his strong advocacy for election integrity, including requiring valid government-issued ID for voting and promoting statewide in-person voting, is vital for restoring trust in our democracy, which directly protects the fundamental right of fair representation for all voters. (0 votes)
#2
Deborah Brown

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is very little public information available about her specific policy positions or her vision for Oregon, making it impossible to confidently assess her commitment to conservative values or her ability to represent our state effectively. Voters need to know where a candidate stands on key issues before they can earn our trust. (10 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no available information about her policy positions or political stances. Without understanding her views on critical issues like the economy, public safety, or government spending, I cannot determine if she would effectively represent the conservative values important to me. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest among a field of concerning options because there is very little publicly available information about her specific policy stances. This lack of a clear, actively harmful agenda, especially regarding environmental destruction or social oppression, means she presents the least immediate threat to the foundational values of ecological wisdom and social justice. The unknown is, in this case, marginally preferable to known harmful positions. (5 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate highest because there is a lack of publicly available extreme policy statements from her campaign. For an extreme progressive, the absence of overtly harmful positions on critical issues like climate, social justice, or healthcare makes her the least objectionable choice among the Republican field, representing the lowest potential for damage to the community. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I found no public statements or platform details addressing crime or public safety. It is vital that candidates for U.S. Senate clearly state their plans to tackle crime, which is my top priority. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because there is no public information available about her stance on inflation or any economic policies. Without any stated position, I cannot assess her alignment with my single-issue focus on controlling rising prices. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because there is very little public information about her specific policy stances, which means she hasn't actively pushed extreme or harmful agendas, upholding the value of minimizing potential damage in a difficult choice. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available information regarding her specific healthcare policies for the 2026 U.S. Senate election. The lack of a clear platform on healthcare makes her an unsuitable choice for a single-issue voter. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Deborah Brown very low because I could not find any relevant information about her policies or positions on parental control, education, or children's issues. Without a clear stance, I cannot trust her to advocate for the crucial issue of parental rights. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no publicly available information on their stance regarding gun rights or the Second Amendment. For a single-issue voter, a candidate's position on this essential freedom must be clear and easily accessible to earn support. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information on her abortion stance, which means she does not clearly align with my most important value of protecting unborn life. Without a stated position, she cannot be trusted to advocate for pro-life policies. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because I could not find any information about her specific plans or ideas for how she would help people like me. It's hard to trust someone with my vote when I don't know what they stand for or how they plan to make a difference in our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because no public information indicates she supports policies that restrict reproductive freedom or other gender rights. This is important for protecting the ability of individuals to make their own healthcare decisions without government interference. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is very limited publicly available information detailing her specific policy positions on issues critical to Libertarian values, such as economic freedom, limited government, or individual rights. Without clear stances, it's impossible to assess her alignment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific policy proposals related to the stock market, taxes, or economic regulation. As a single-issue stock market voter, a lack of clear economic plans makes it impossible to determine how this candidate would benefit my most important value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is insufficient public information available regarding her specific policy positions or platform for this election. Without clear details on her stance on economic or fiscal issues, I cannot assess how she would represent my interests as a high-income resident. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because there is no available information on her policy positions or public statements relevant to the critical concerns of my community. Without any insight into her stance on issues like support for Israel or combating antisemitism, it is impossible to assess her suitability for office. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low-medium because her only stated environmental policy focuses on supporting organic farming. While organic farming has some environmental benefits, it does not address the comprehensive and urgent actions needed to combat climate change, showing a limited understanding of the scale of the crisis. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because there is very little public information available about her specific policy stances. This lack of a clear, defined platform makes her less predictable but also suggests a lower level of campaign organization and public recognition, which would make her less of a threat in a general election. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find specific information regarding their stance on federal tax policy for this U.S. Senate race. As a single-issue taxes voter, a candidate's clear position on reducing the tax burden is paramount, and without that information, it is impossible to assess their alignment with my values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I was unable to find any specific information regarding their immigration policies or views on border security. For me, a candidate's stance on immigration is the most critical issue. Without a clear position on how to secure our borders and address illegal immigration, I cannot determine if they would protect Oregon's interests and uphold the rule of law. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there's just not enough clear information about their specific policy positions for this U.S. Senate race. To make a real choice, I need to know what they actually stand for, and it's hard to find that for them right now. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because her stated interest in the economic viability of small and organic farming, and her concern for public health regarding certain crops, touches upon humanist values of sustainable living and community well-being. However, the limited scope of her publicly available stances makes it difficult to ascertain broader alignment with core humanist principles. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Deborah Brown low because there is very little public information available about her specific policy positions or campaign for U.S. Senate. Without clear stances on critical issues, it's impossible to understand how she would represent Oregonians or uphold conservative values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because there is no readily available information on her platform or specific policy positions for the U.S. Senate race. Without understanding her stance on key issues like the economy, safety, or housing, I cannot make an informed decision or consider her a viable candidate. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because there is no clear information available about her positions or platform. Without knowing where she stands on crucial issues, I cannot confidently support her to represent Oregon in the U.S. Senate. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there's not enough clear information available about her specific policies or what she stands for. It's hard to support someone when you don't know how they'll truly represent the interests of rural Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because there is no readily available information on her policies or background. Without any stated positions or public record, it's impossible to evaluate her suitability for office or her alignment with core conservative values, leaving voters completely in the dark. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available about her policy positions or vision for Oregon. A lack of a clear platform means voters cannot understand how she would address critical issues like systemic inequality or housing, making it impossible to trust her to represent our community's urgent needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest due to the lack of available public information regarding her specific platform and policy stances. As a voter, it's essential to understand a candidate's concrete plans and history to make an informed decision, and without this, it's impossible to evaluate her alignment with my values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because I cannot find specific information on her platform or political positions for the U.S. Senate race in Oregon, making it impossible to evaluate her for this election. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is no clear information about her specific conservative policy positions for Oregon or her stance on key issues important to our faith. Without a demonstrated commitment to traditional values, fiscal responsibility, or constitutional liberties, she cannot be trusted to represent our interests in the Senate. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no clear information about her specific policy positions or platform for this election. Without knowing where she stands on crucial issues like government spending or individual freedoms, I cannot support her. There's nothing to show she'd fight for our values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate fourth because her background as a retired civil engineer suggests a logical, problem-solving mindset grounded in facts and data. This professional approach, prioritizing evidence over ideology, aligns with the critical atheist value of rational decision-making in government. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate here because she has a professional background as a retired civil engineer with experience in federal government. While her professional experience is good, I haven't seen enough specific details on her policy positions to rank her higher, so it's hard to know how she'd truly tackle Oregon's issues. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough public information available about her specific stances or plans for Oregon's manual workers to make an informed decision. I need to see clear policies that will directly impact my job and community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because there is insufficient public information available about her specific policy positions or background. Without a clear understanding of her platform, it is impossible to determine how she aligns with the conservative values and needs of Oregonians, making her an unknown and therefore unsupportable choice. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her extensive career working for the state government, including under a liberal governor, shows she is too much a part of the establishment. We need a strong voice from outside the status quo, not someone who has helped expand government programs that go against our conservative values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is insufficient public information regarding her specific stances or priorities for the U.S. Senate race. It is important for a candidate to clearly communicate their vision and values, and without that, it is impossible to determine her alignment with our most important principles. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because there is not enough public information available about her specific policy positions or her stance on the critical issues facing our state and country. Without a clear platform, it's impossible to determine if she would truly fight for our conservative values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Deborah Brown lowest because her public profile lacks clear, specific policy positions that demonstrate a strong conservative vision for Oregon, making it difficult for voters to understand how she would effectively advocate for Republican values and address the critical issues facing the state. (0 votes)
#3
David Burch

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he supports Donald Trump, his past admission of pleading guilty to felonies raises serious questions about his judgment and suitability for public office. Additionally, his past self-description as a 'liberal Republican' creates confusion about his core conservative principles, which undermines trust for voters seeking a clear and consistent fighter for our values. (15 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his public statements, including a willingness to 'hand Portland to ICE on a silver platter' and his admitted past felonies, represent extreme views that are completely unacceptable to Portlanders. These radical positions would make him highly unpalatable to most Oregon voters, making him an easy opponent to beat in the general election. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because his self-identification as a 'Trump OG' and his felony pleas raise serious questions about his judgment and commitment to the rule of law. More importantly, his anti-'gender ideology' stance on children's protection is deeply discriminatory and harmful to LGBTQ+ youth, directly attacking progressive values of equality and inclusion. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear information available on his stance on crime or public safety. As a single-issue crime voter, it is essential for me to know a candidate's position on this critical issue, and its absence is problematic. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no publicly available information on their stance regarding gun rights or the Second Amendment. For a single-issue voter, a candidate's position on this essential freedom must be clear and easily accessible to earn support. (1 votes)

Reason I rank David Burch very low because I found no information on his platform or views regarding parental control, education, or children's issues. For a single-issue voter like myself, a complete lack of information on this vital topic makes him an unsuitable candidate. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because he says he's unemployed and has pleaded guilty to felonies. I need a senator who can actually get things done and who I can trust to make good choices for the community, and his background makes me question his ability to do that effectively. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his stances are too inconsistent with true conservative values. Supporting the abolition of the Electoral College and his nuanced view on abortion, despite being a Trump supporter, are unacceptable for someone claiming to represent our principles. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is no clear information available on his policy positions regarding inflation or economic stability. His history as a perennial candidate without a specific anti-inflation platform means he does not address my single most important issue. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign information does not outline any specific healthcare policies for the 2026 U.S. Senate race. As a single-issue healthcare voter, I cannot support a candidate who has not articulated their plans for improving healthcare access, affordability, or quality. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific policy proposals related to the stock market, taxes, or economic regulation. As a single-issue stock market voter, a lack of clear economic plans makes it impossible to determine how this candidate would benefit my most important value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last. He's run for several offices before and hasn't gotten much support. The fact that he's currently unemployed and doesn't have a clear, specific platform for this race makes it seem like he's not a serious contender. We need someone with a real plan and a strong chance to make a difference. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he explicitly states that man-made climate change is a global threat requiring urgent political action and mentions nuclear power as a solution. This direct acknowledgment and proposed carbon-free energy solution are crucial for addressing the climate crisis and securing a livable future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his stance on abolishing the Electoral College goes against a foundational principle of our republic, which is essential for ensuring fair representation for all states, especially smaller ones like Oregon. This position undermines the stable structure of our government that I value deeply. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available information on their specific tax policies for the 2026 U.S. Senate election in Oregon. For a single-issue taxes voter, a lack of a clear stance on taxation is a significant concern, as it prevents me from understanding how they would impact my primary interest of lower taxes. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his isolationist foreign policy stance directly undermines the critical need for strong international alliances, especially for the security of Israel. His belief that the U.S. should avoid foreign involvement unless facing a "World War in threat" compromises the vital support needed for our global allies. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his self-description as a 'liberal Republican' and his history of receiving very few votes in previous elections are significant concerns. For someone seeking strong, conservative leadership, a candidate who identifies as 'liberal Republican' does not represent the firm principles needed to address Oregon's challenges effectively. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his foreign policy stance explicitly states that the United States should remain focused on its own sovereignty and avoid intervention in other nations' policies unless facing imminent danger. This non-interventionist approach is crucial for preventing further U.S. involvement in conflicts in Muslim-majority lands, which is a paramount concern for our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because his self-proclaimed identity as a 'Trump OG' who used 'internet activism' to support Donald Trump signals a deep alignment with a political movement that has consistently attacked environmental regulations and promoted divisive social policies. This strong association with anti-science rhetoric and disregard for democratic norms directly contradicts the Green Party's commitment to ecological wisdom and social justice. Such affiliations make him a dangerous choice for our future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong 'Trump OG' identity and background as an internet activist. This is important because it shows they are a genuine outsider who isn't afraid to challenge the political establishment and bring a disruptive, authentic voice to Washington, which is what we need to shake things up. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because his 'Make Oregon Great Again' slogan and identification as a 'Trump OG' suggest a general alignment with stronger immigration enforcement. While this hints at a desire for stricter border policies, I need more specific details on his plans to secure our borders and address illegal immigration. A clear plan for action is essential for the safety and well-being of Oregon residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no readily available public information detailing his specific policy positions for the U.S. Senate race. Without any platform or clear stances, it is impossible to determine his commitment to Libertarian principles of individual liberty and limited government. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate as the worst because his deeply anti-secular interpretation of the separation of church and state, claiming it's not 'freedom FROM religion,' and his expressed concerns about 'gender ideology, grooming, and bodily mutilation' for children reveal a profound rejection of individual liberty, bodily autonomy, and LGBTQ+ rights, which are fundamental to humanist ethics. These positions actively seek to impose specific religious views and harm vulnerable populations. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because, while he doesn't explicitly state anti-gender rights policies, his association with "Trump OG" suggests a leaning towards policies that typically oppose reproductive freedom. This raises concerns about his potential impact on established gender rights. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his history of pleading guilty to felonies and being unemployed makes him seem less credible. While he supports tax cuts, his personal background makes me question his ability to lead effectively for Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank David Burch low because his history as a perennial candidate with very low vote counts and his self-description as "unemployed" raise concerns about his viability and effectiveness in the U.S. Senate. While he expresses strong loyalty to conservative figures, the lack of a clear, actionable platform makes it difficult to see him as a serious contender for meaningful change. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite identifying as a 'Trump OG,' he has not presented specific policy positions on issues vital to me, such as the sanctity of life or religious freedom. While support for conservative leaders is good, a candidate must demonstrate their commitment to fundamental values through concrete stances to earn full support. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his self-described 'Trump OG' persona and past controversial statements make him seem less electable and potentially divisive. While I appreciate a candidate who pays their debts, I prefer a focus on specific, broad-reaching policies that benefit all Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he claims to be a 'Trump OG' and supports individual rights, his criminal record and past statements about being a 'liberal Republican' who wants to 'reach across the aisle' are deeply concerning. We need strong, uncompromised conservative leadership, not someone who dilutes our message. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, like others, there's not enough public information on his stance on key issues important to rural Oregon. Without knowing his detailed positions, it's hard to trust he would be our voice in the Senate. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his history of extremely low vote counts in previous elections and his self-described 'liberal Republican' status shows a lack of serious commitment or alignment with conservative values. Voters need serious candidates who can actually win and represent a clear conservative vision, not someone who is unemployed and running on an inconsistent platform. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because his primary public identity is being a 'Trump OG' without offering a clear, substantive platform that addresses the specific struggles of working-class people in Portland. This strong alignment with past policies often disregarded the needs of marginalized urban communities, which is unacceptable. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he is a strong supporter of Donald Trump and has used internet activism to advance conservative goals, showing a dedication to the populist movement that resonates with voters who want a disruptive force in Washington. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he is a perennial candidate with a focus on internet activism and broad political aspirations, rather than clear, actionable economic policies for Oregon. His self-description as a 'liberal Republican' and past low vote counts make him an unconvincing choice for a fiscally conservative voter. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he identifies as a 'Trump OG,' his history as a perennial candidate with very low vote counts, like 406 for Governor, and listing himself as unemployed, raises concerns about his ability to effectively represent and fight for our conservative values in the Senate. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his previous runs haven't shown much support, and calling himself a 'liberal Republican' makes me question his commitment to core conservative values. We need a strong, clear conservative voice, not someone trying to please everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because his surprisingly nuanced stance on abortion, allowing exceptions for mother's health, rape, and incest, demonstrates a practical consideration for bodily autonomy and individual circumstances, which is a critical secular value in a field often opposed to reproductive rights. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he identifies as a 'Trump OG' who used internet activism to help Donald Trump, his campaign for this Senate race does not clearly outline specific plans to benefit manual workers in Oregon. I need a candidate with a direct vision for local jobs and economic improvement. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his identity as a 'Trump OG' and a consistent internet activist for President Trump demonstrates a strong and unwavering loyalty to nationalist leadership and a commitment to fighting for conservative ideals. This kind of conviction is rare and important for our movement. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because he proudly identifies as a 'Trump OG' and has actively supported the movement to put America First. This shows a commitment to strong, populist leadership and a willingness to fight for traditional values, which is exactly what we need to restore our state and country. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information on his abortion stance, which means he does not clearly align with my most important value of protecting unborn life. Without a stated position, he cannot be trusted to advocate for pro-life policies. (0 votes)
#4
Russell McAlmond

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their policy of 'Ethical Individualism' and opposition to DEI initiatives. This matters to me because it means valuing people as individuals, not just groups, which cuts through the divisive identity politics that are so common in Portland, promoting true individual freedom and fairness. (7 votes)

Reason I rank Russell McAlmond high because his dedication to "Ethical Individualism" firmly opposes divisive identity politics like DEI, focusing instead on individual merit, and his experience as a financial planner means he understands fiscal conservatism, which is essential for protecting Oregonians from excessive taxes and wasteful spending. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his opposition to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, which he describes as a 'secular moral system' that creates discriminatory hierarchies, directly conflicts with the humanist value of promoting equality and social justice for all individuals, especially marginalized groups. His views undermine efforts to address systemic inequalities and foster an inclusive society. (6 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because he strongly defends traditional values by opposing men competing in women's sports, which upholds the God-given differences between male and female. He also stands against Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, calling them a 'secular moral system' that goes against true individual equality. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his professional background as a Chief Investment Officer and Certified Financial Planner, showing a deep understanding of financial markets. His support for reducing taxes and regulations nationally and in Oregon directly benefits corporate profits, which is a key driver for stock market growth, the value I prioritize most. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate third because his campaign indicates a pro-life position, which is an essential value. He has a 'Pro-Life Position' and states that abortion involves two human lives with 'equal dignity and worth,' aligning with the protection of unborn life. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their explicit and strong stance on gun rights, affirming that all law-abiding citizens have the right to choose their firearms for defense. This policy is essential for preserving individual freedom and preventing burdensome gun laws. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he promises to reduce taxes, which is crucial for service workers trying to make ends meet in Oregon. He also stands strong on traditional values and the Second Amendment, which shows he won't bend to the extreme left that dominates Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign explicitly states a "Pro-Life Position" and advocates against what he perceives as "discrimination against women" in sports, which can be interpreted as opposition to transgender rights. This directly undermines the bodily autonomy and equal rights of individuals. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Russell McAlmond third because his focus on "Ethical Individualism" and opposition to carving America up by race, sex, or identity implies he would fight against ideologies in schools that undermine parental values. This indirectly supports parents' control over the moral and social education of their children. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he strongly defends the right to self-defense and believes additional gun control laws only hurt law-abiding citizens, not criminals. He also highlights issues like "criminal aliens" and "extremists" in Portland as threats, showing he understands key crime concerns that impact our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his explicit commitment to 'iron-clad protection of Jewish students and all Jews' clearly prioritizes one group above others and does not acknowledge the paramount need to address the suffering and injustices faced by Palestinians. This demonstrates a bias that is unacceptable to our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign platform focuses heavily on abstract principles like "Ethical Individualism" and economic issues, without any discernible mention of climate change or environmental policy. This complete silence on the climate crisis indicates a profound lack of priority for the defining challenge of our era. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his unwavering commitment to Israel's security and his explicit opposition to antisemitism. His clear stance that "Israel is not the oppressor but the oppressed" directly aligns with the essential value of supporting the Jewish homeland, which is paramount for our community's safety and continued existence. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate fourth because he brings strong conservative values, especially on protecting the Second Amendment and women's sports. As a Marine veteran, he understands the importance of strength and principled leadership, which is a core value, though his emphasis on 'common sense' might dilute the necessary fight against extreme left policies. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate third because of his strong opposition to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, which he sees as a 'secular moral system' that divides people. This stance defends the Christian belief in the inherent dignity of every individual over group identities, promoting unity and true equality. This is vital in protecting our children from harmful ideologies. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because his healthcare stance emphasizes keeping the government out of the relationship between patients and doctors. While I appreciate the focus on individual choice, his campaign lacks specific, actionable policies that would ensure comprehensive access or affordability for all Oregonians, which is a critical concern for a single-issue healthcare voter. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign focuses on 'common sense' and 'ethical individualism,' but I found no specific policies or strong statements regarding immigration enforcement or border security. For me, a candidate must have a clear and firm stance on securing our borders and stopping illegal immigration, as this directly impacts our state's safety and economic stability. Without this, it's hard to know if he truly prioritizes this crucial issue. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he clearly supports tax reduction, which directly benefits hardworking Oregonian families and small businesses. As a financial expert, he understands that high taxes hurt our state's economic opportunity. His commitment to fiscal responsibility and reducing the tax burden is a vital value for prosperity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he promotes 'Ethical Individualism' and strongly opposes gun control. This stance reinforces the fundamental right to self-ownership and the protection of individual liberty from government infringement, which is paramount. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Russell McAlmond medium because he's a Marine veteran who understands fiscal responsibility and advocates for individual merit over divisive identity politics. His commitment to ethical individualism and balanced budgets is essential for bringing common sense back to government and ensuring economic opportunity for all Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because he identifies as a fiscal conservative and emphasizes reducing costs for everyone, drawing on his financial planning background. While not as explicit on specific inflation-fighting measures as others, his focus on financial expertise suggests a practical approach to economic stability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because he advocates for reducing taxes and bringing common sense back to Oregon, which is important for my financial stability. His background as a financial planner and Marine veteran suggests a strong, practical approach to issues without extremism. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate third because he is a U.S. Marine veteran with strong conservative values, pushing for lower taxes and protecting our Second Amendment rights. His support for Voter ID and opposing men in women's sports shows he understands the important cultural battles we are facing. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his campaign rhetoric emphasizes 'common sense' and fighting 'extremism,' which, while vague, at least hints at a desire for pragmatic solutions over divisive ideology, a value I prioritize for constructive governance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he focuses on reducing the cost of living and ending homelessness for American citizens. As a financial planner, he might actually understand how to help people manage their money and find stable housing, which is critical for survival here. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he's a fiscal conservative who wants to cut taxes and government spending. As a Marine veteran, he also supports our Second Amendment rights and believes in term limits, which means less career politicians and more accountability for us, the taxpayers. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform directly challenges the extreme progressive agenda that is hurting Oregon. He advocates for reducing taxes, supports voter ID, and believes in term limits, which are vital for fiscal sanity and fair representation. His commitment to traditional values and opposing men in women's sports is a breath of fresh air. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his opposition to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives and his stance against men competing in women's sports are directly at odds with core progressive values in Oregon. While he claims to be a centrist, these specific conservative policies would likely alienate many voters in a general election. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his core philosophy of 'Ethical Individualism' and explicit opposition to racism, focusing on treating every person with respect as an individual, offers a framework that could help dismantle group-based discrimination. This approach, though different, aims for a society where character, not identity, defines worth. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because his financial expertise and commitment to reducing taxes are crucial for our state's economy. As a financial expert, he advocates for less taxation and regulation, which is vital for businesses and families struggling under current burdens, ensuring greater economic opportunity for all. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he advocates for lower taxes and less government regulation, which are important for allowing Oregonians to keep more of their earnings and reducing government overreach in our lives. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his background as a financial expert and Chief Investment Officer gives him a deep understanding of economic issues. His clear stance on reducing taxes and regulation aligns directly with my financial interests and promotes a more favorable business climate in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because he explicitly rejects extremism from both sides and advocates for a common-sense, unifying approach, which is vital for healing the deep divisions in our state. His long-standing connection to Portland and focus on bringing people together suggest he might be more open to compromise and less focused on national culture wars, which is a rare quality among Republicans. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because he is a Marine veteran who pushes for treating everyone as unique individuals, not by their group, which is important for freedom. He also supports reducing taxes and the Second Amendment, which are crucial conservative values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate best because his emphasis on "Ethical Individualism" and treating people as unique individuals, rather than by group identities, aligns with the secular humanist value of individual autonomy and universal respect, free from ideological dogma. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because he's a Marine veteran and a financial expert who talks about common-sense leadership and reducing taxes. He understands that Oregonians are too heavily taxed, and he promises to fight for practical solutions for the majority, not just the extremes. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he is a fiscal conservative who is against funding healthcare for undocumented immigrants, which saves taxpayer money. This aligns with my value of responsible spending, ensuring our hard-earned money goes to support citizens first, not to those who entered the country illegally. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his commitment to fiscal responsibility and term limits, which is vital for reining in government overspending. He has pledged to serve no more than two terms, showing he prioritizes service over a political career, which is a core value for keeping politicians accountable to the people of Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on 'Ethical Individualism' and avoiding 'extremism' can often dismiss the systemic injustices that Green Party values aim to address, such as environmental racism or economic inequality. Furthermore, his strong support for firearm ownership without mentioning any common-sense regulations stands in opposition to the Green Party's principle of non-violence. While he claims to oppose racism, his general approach seems unlikely to champion the deep social and ecological transformations our community needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he's a Marine veteran who speaks plainly about fiscal responsibility and putting an end to career politicians through term limits. His clear stance against identity politics and protecting women's sports from men competing is crucial for traditional values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his commitment to 'Ethical Individualism,' which rejects divisive group identities and instead emphasizes treating every person with respect as a unique individual, is crucial for preserving our cultural heritage and moral fabric. His military service further demonstrates his dedication to our nation. (0 votes)
#5
Jo Rae Perkins

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her unwavering stance against government overreach and her commitment to individual liberties. She wants to cut down unconstitutional federal agencies and supports medical freedom, which is vital when our government tries to force things on us. (10 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her unwavering pro-life stance, which is the most important value. She is 100% pro-life, believes life begins at conception, and has been endorsed by Oregon Right to Life, clearly showing her commitment to protecting all unborn life. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her strong association with the QAnon conspiracy theory and extreme anti-abortion views make her highly out of step with the majority of Oregonians. This means she would be the easiest Republican candidate to defeat in the general election, ensuring a progressive voice for Oregon in the Senate. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because she explicitly denies the reality of man-made climate change and targets agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency. This stance is a direct threat to any progress on climate action and would worsen the environmental devastation we are already experiencing in Oregon. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because she is a true fighter who stands for strong constitutional principles and is not afraid to speak out against federal overreach. Her firm stance on securing our borders, especially against illegal cartel drugs like fentanyl, is crucial for protecting our communities and our families, which is the most important value. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her platform directly targets inflation through reduced federal spending and deregulation. This approach aligns with the critical need to control government overspending, which drives up prices for everyone. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she clearly states that 'a country without borders is just a mass of land,' which shows she understands the importance of national sovereignty. She also advocates for finishing the border wall to stop trafficking, which is a crucial step towards securing our nation and protecting our citizens. While some of her positions are not as strict as I would prefer, her stance on border security demonstrates a commitment to controlling who enters our country. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because she is 100% pro-life, anti-Planned Parenthood, and strongly anti-gender identity, even opposing abortion in cases of rape or incest. Her stance directly and severely threatens the fundamental gender rights and bodily autonomy of Oregonians. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear and consistent policy of supporting the Second Amendment as it is written, which is crucial for protecting our right to self-defense. This commitment reassures gun owners that their fundamental liberties will not be compromised. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because her public endorsement of the QAnon conspiracy theory and attendance at events surrounding the January 6th Capitol attack directly contradicts the fundamental atheist values of critical thinking, evidence-based reality, and stable democratic processes. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Jo Rae Perkins low because I could not find current specific policy statements or a clear history demonstrating a strong commitment to parental control in education or children's issues. While she is a Republican, her platform information doesn't highlight this as a primary focus. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because her stated foreign policy to 'Stand by our Allies, including Israel' directly contradicts the urgent need for justice and freedom for the Palestinian people. This stance ignores the suffering and oppression of our brethren, which is a value of utmost importance to our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she is a strong advocate for constitutional rights and against government overreach, which protects our religious freedoms. She has stated that forcing people to stay home is 'not America' and 'a communist country,' showing her commitment to individual liberty, a core value of our faith. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her stance against federal government overreach and her skepticism of official narratives directly addresses the frustrations many of us feel. She pushes for big changes like replacing income taxes with consumption taxes, which could make everyday life more affordable for working families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she has consistently shown strong support for law enforcement and a clear stance against the disruptive protests in Portland. She emphasized the need to support police efforts and believes cases of police brutality have been overstated. Maintaining order and backing our police are crucial for public safety. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because, despite some stated support for Israel, her history of promoting an antisemitic view, even through a retweet, is completely unacceptable. Protecting our community from hate is a non-negotiable value, and any association with such harmful rhetoric directly threatens the safety and well-being of Jewish people. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her unwavering stance on 'America First' values, constitutional principles, and strong opposition to what she sees as government overreach truly resonates with the importance of national sovereignty and traditional order. She is a true warrior for our values, standing firm on issues like medical freedom and the Second Amendment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their stated policy of being pro-tax cuts and against excessive government spending. This directly supports my core value of reducing the tax burden on citizens. While some of the information is from previous campaigns, the consistent message against 'out of control spending' and for 'tax cuts' is a positive sign for voters concerned about their wallets. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because her public embrace of the QAnon conspiracy theory and her anti-mask stance during a global pandemic fundamentally contradict the humanist values of reason, scientific inquiry, and public health. Promoting baseless conspiracy theories undermines critical thinking and evidence-based decision-making, which are crucial for societal progress and human well-being. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong stance on limiting federal overreach, which protects our personal freedoms. She has consistently advocated for shrinking government agencies to curtail spending, which means less burden on our families and businesses. This commitment to reducing government interference is a core value for those who believe in individual liberty and fiscal responsibility. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her specific and detailed policy proposal, the Medicare Advantage Market Freedom and Accountability Act of 2027, which aims to expand patient choice and cut red tape in healthcare. This plan includes removing government restrictions on Medicare Advantage plans, making them portable across counties, and mandating coverage for holistic treatments, which would improve access and options for many Oregonians. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their consistent stance against federal government overreach and for individual liberty, especially medical freedom. This is crucial because it aligns with pushing back against too much government control in our lives, ensuring people have the freedom to make their own choices. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she consistently champions Constitutional rights, especially the Second Amendment, and advocates for reduced federal spending. These positions are vital for limiting government power and protecting individual liberties from overreach. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she consistently champions fiscal conservatism and limited government, which are core Republican values that protect taxpayers from overspending. She also bravely challenges mainstream narratives and the political establishment, showing a willingness to question authority and fight for what she believes is true, which is essential for holding our government accountable. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jo Rae Perkins high because she fearlessly challenges the establishment and champions election integrity, which is crucial for restoring faith in our democracy. Her dedication to common-sense values like term limits and supporting veterans demonstrates a commitment to real change that will empower Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because she consistently identifies as pro-life, aligning with the crucial value of protecting the unborn. She also advocates for strong fiscal policies, like privatizing Medicare and Social Security, which promotes responsible stewardship and self-reliance. This shows a commitment to both moral and financial principles important to our faith. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because her past association with the QAnon conspiracy theory is a major concern. While she supports law and order and fiscal responsibility, the conspiracy connection makes her appear less credible and likely unelectable in a general election in Oregon, which is not what we need. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because she consistently stands for true conservative values and isn't afraid to speak out against government overreach, especially regarding things like COVID-19 mandates. She even attended the January 6th protest because she believed in questioning the election results, showing she's a fighter for election integrity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because her active promotion of dangerous conspiracy theories like QAnon directly undermines the importance of truth, science, and a shared reality, which are necessary for addressing real-world challenges like climate change and social justice. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because she has been linked to QAnon conspiracy theories and has talked about eliminating government departments. If she cuts services, it could really hurt people who depend on them, and I need stability, not someone who might make things even harder for struggling families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong stance on protecting constitutional rights and her push for local control over federal agencies. This directly impacts our lives by ensuring decisions about our land and resources are made by those closest to us, which is a core value for rural folks. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her unwavering stance against federal government overreach, especially concerning land management and individual medical freedom, is exactly what Oregon needs. She consistently champions constitutional rights and the 2nd Amendment, prioritizing individual liberty above all else, which is a critical value being eroded. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because her history of supporting conspiracy theories and opposing movements for racial justice, like the George Floyd protests, directly undermines the fight against systemic oppression. These actions demonstrate a fundamental disconnect from the values of equity and justice that are essential for our community's progress. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her strong stance on shrinking the federal government and protecting the 2nd Amendment aligns with core conservative values important to me. She has consistently called for dramatically reducing the scope of federal agencies and allowing people to live their lives without excessive government interference, which fosters individual liberty. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her outspoken support for questioning mainstream narratives, especially concerning things like QAnon, shows she's not afraid to challenge the establishment, which is important for voters who feel ignored by traditional politics. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her history of multiple unsuccessful Senate campaigns and her association with fringe conspiracy theories raise significant concerns about her electability and ability to govern effectively. While she expresses anti-tax sentiments, her broader approach lacks the stability and mainstream appeal necessary to represent Oregon's complex economic interests. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low. While she has been involved in the Republican Party and has some good ideas like term limits, her history of losing multiple general elections worries me. We need a candidate who can actually win and represent Oregon in the Senate, and her past performance doesn't give me confidence in that. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her past association with the QAnon conspiracy theory is a significant concern, despite her strong conservative positions. Embracing such theories can erode public trust and distract from serious policy debates, which is not what we need for effective representation in the U.S. Senate. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because of her strong and repeated association with the QAnon conspiracy theory. Embracing such baseless and often dangerous ideologies directly undermines critical thinking, factual discourse, and the very fabric of an informed democracy, which are essential for achieving ecological and social justice. Her past statements against government departments and denying scientific consensus like the reality of COVID-19 further cement her as an unacceptable choice for any public office, posing a direct threat to public health and safety. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her consistent, strong stances on limited government and individual freedom are exactly what Oregon needs. She wants to cut bloated federal agencies and supports medical freedom, which is important to protect our personal choices from government overreach. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jo Rae Perkins highest because she consistently champions uncompromising conservative principles, like her strong pro-life and pro-2nd Amendment stances, and her outspoken skepticism towards federal overreach directly challenges the establishment, which is crucial for fighting for real change for Oregon voters. (0 votes)
#6
Timothy Skelton

Reason I rank this candidate high because his plan promises to create 15,000 new jobs in timber, tech, and trades. Having more jobs means more chances for people like me to find steady work, which is the most important step towards getting out of poverty. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his concrete plans for job creation and strengthening education are essential for our community's future. His $85 million plan to jumpstart 15,000 jobs in timber, tech, and trades will bring much-needed economic growth and stability, and his focus on public charter options empowers families in education. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no public information on his abortion stance, which means he does not clearly align with my most important value of protecting unborn life. Without a stated position, he cannot be trusted to advocate for pro-life policies. (2 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign primarily focuses on domestic issues like forest management, education, and job creation. While these are important, they do not address the critical foreign policy concerns or religious freedom issues that are paramount for our community, leaving his stance on these vital matters unclear. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Timothy Skelton low because his focus on practical issues like protecting Oregon's timber industry and improving school safety is important for local communities, but his platform lacks the broader, more aggressive ideological fight against government overreach and progressive agendas that is necessary to truly transform Oregon. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his focus on creating 15,000 new jobs and saving taxpayers money through forest management is positive for the overall economy. While not directly targeting stock market specific policies, a stronger economy with more jobs can indirectly lead to higher consumer spending and corporate earnings, which benefits the stock market, my key value. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his plan for forest reform and protecting timber jobs shows he understands the economic needs of rural Oregon. His focus on creating jobs and safer schools are important for our communities and future generations. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their campaign website does not mention their position on gun rights or the Second Amendment. Transparency on this crucial issue is vital for gun owners to decide if a candidate will protect their fundamental right to bear arms. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher than others who actively deny environmental crises because his platform mentions 'sustainable forest management' and 'habitat restoration,' even if framed economically. While his focus is still on timber and saving money, the mere acknowledgment of restoring ecosystems, even for future recreational use, offers a faint, distant glimmer of potential for ecological wisdom compared to outright environmental destruction. This suggests a less hostile stance towards nature, which is a core Green value. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his plan to create 15,000 jobs in timber, tech, and trades, along with his focus on school safety, directly addresses economic opportunity and the well-being of families in Oregon. These are vital for a secure future for my family. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his main focus on forest management and education, while good, doesn't directly address the urgent need for smaller government and economic freedom that impacts our daily lives. Other candidates offer stronger solutions for those issues. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Timothy Skelton second because his education plan includes "Choice & Transparency" with significant funding for public charter options. This empowers families by giving them more say in where and how their children are educated, which is a crucial aspect of parental control. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign materials do not present any specific policies related to healthcare for the 2026 U.S. Senate race. For a single-issue healthcare voter, a candidate's silence on this vital issue indicates a lack of priority or a clear plan, which is unacceptable. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his platform prioritizes forest management, including fire prevention and habitat restoration, which are crucial for maintaining natural carbon sinks. These actions are important for mitigating the effects of climate change and preserving Oregon's ecosystems. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate third because his platform focuses on pragmatic, evidence-based solutions for forest management, education, and job creation, without apparent religious influence. This emphasis on tangible, secular policy over faith-based initiatives is valuable for effective governance in Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his detailed plans for forest management and job creation in timber, tech, and trades offer tangible economic benefits for Oregon. His focus on saving taxpayer money and supporting education, including charter schools, can lead to a stronger workforce and a more stable economy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his campaign focuses on issues like forest management and job creation, without publicly advocating for policies that restrict gender rights. This is important for ensuring elected officials prioritize economic and environmental well-being over attempting to control bodily autonomy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform focuses mainly on general economic and educational issues, such as forest management and school safety. While these are important, he has not articulated clear stances on the critical moral and social issues that are essential for me, as a faithful voter, to support a candidate. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear focus on practical, Oregon-specific issues like responsible forest management and improving education. His plan to save taxpayers millions on wildfire losses and strengthen our schools shows a dedication to smart, local solutions that directly benefit our communities and economy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his background as a reserve police officer and armed security officer shows direct experience in maintaining public safety, demonstrating a practical understanding of law enforcement needs. His campaign also mentions a focus on "safer schools," which is an important step towards protecting our children. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific information about their tax policy positions for the upcoming U.S. Senate election. As a voter focused solely on taxes, it is crucial to understand a candidate's plan for reducing the tax burden on citizens, and the absence of such information makes them an unfavorable choice. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his focus on strengthening education through school safety and quality education is vital for raising children with strong moral foundations. His plan to invest in public charter options supports parental choice in their children's upbringing, which is a fundamental right and aligns with Christian values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform focuses on practical, Oregon-specific issues like forest management, education, and job creation, which are essential for the state's well-being. This pragmatic approach, especially his focus on helping low-income students, shows a willingness to address tangible problems that directly impact our communities, prioritizing action over divisive rhetoric. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I found no information on their immigration policies or their stance on securing the border. As a voter focused solely on immigration, it is essential that a candidate clearly articulates their plans to address illegal immigration and protect our national sovereignty. Without such a stance, I cannot confidently support their candidacy to safeguard our state and nation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his plan to create 15,000 new jobs in timber, tech, and trades will bring much-needed economic growth to our state. He also focuses on forest management, aiming to save $500 million in wildfire losses and protect our critical timber industry. These practical policies are important for the livelihoods of many Oregonians and the responsible use of our natural resources. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on practical solutions like forest management and creating jobs is good, but his platform lacks the strong, definitive stance on critical issues that truly resonate with extreme conservative principles. While job creation and school safety are important, they don't address the root causes of government overreach and fiscal irresponsibility with the same intensity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because their focus on equitable education and mental health support for students aligns with the humanist value of fostering well-being and intellectual development for all, ensuring every child has a fair chance to thrive regardless of their background. Their plans aim to reduce overcrowded classrooms and provide crucial counseling services, which is vital for a compassionate society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their practical plan for forest management, which includes wildfire prevention and protecting timber jobs. This is important because it addresses a real problem in Oregon with concrete actions, saving money and boosting local industries that our state relies on. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on education reform through public charter options introduces market principles into schooling. This is a step towards empowering individuals and families with choice, rather than relying solely on government-controlled systems, which is crucial for fostering educational freedom. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his plan to improve forest management and create jobs in timber and trades directly addresses real problems facing rural Oregon, showing he cares about our state's economy and traditional industries. His commitment to school safety is also vital for protecting our children and ensuring a proper, focused education, which is a common-sense value for all Oregon families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he focuses on creating 15,000 new jobs in vital sectors like timber, tech, and trades, which is essential for working Oregonians. His plan to invest in school safety and improve education also shows he cares about the future of our communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Timothy Skelton medium because he offers practical solutions for Oregon's economy, focusing on smart forest management and creating thousands of jobs in vital industries like timber. His commitment to strengthening education and ensuring school safety is crucial for our children's future and aligns with the value of strong communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign primarily focuses on job creation and other economic plans, without specifically detailing how he would combat inflation through fiscal restraint or monetary policy. While jobs are important, his platform doesn't directly address my core concern about rising prices. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate fourth because his focus on practical issues like responsible forest management, school safety, and creating jobs in timber and trades is important for Oregon. While he doesn't use the fiery rhetoric I prefer, his commitment to these foundational issues could bring stability to our state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his focus on sustainable forest management, even from a Republican perspective, suggests a willingness to protect our natural environment, which is a critical value for Oregon's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his platform prioritizes essential community needs like school safety and job creation. Investing in safe schools and good jobs contributes to the overall well-being of our children and families, which is a vital aspect of a thriving community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because their education plan directly tackles systemic inequality by allocating significant funds to low-income school districts, showing a commitment to ensuring that a child's zip code does not limit their opportunities. This is vital for uplifting communities that have been historically underserved. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on creating jobs and improving forest management shows a practical approach to boosting our state's economy and protecting natural resources, which can benefit working families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because his focus on practical issues like forest management, education, and job creation, while still coming from a conservative perspective, appears less ideologically driven than other candidates. His emphasis on mental health support and aid for low-income school districts, even with support for charter schools, suggests a pragmatic approach that might slightly temper more harmful Republican policies, which is a small positive for community well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because he focuses on important issues like proper forest management, which is vital for our state's economy and preventing wildfires, and improving school safety. His background as a Scoutmaster suggests he values community and responsibility, which is important to me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his plans for forest management and supporting charter schools offer practical solutions that directly benefit our communities. Preventing wildfires and giving parents more choice in education are clear, common-sense priorities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform focuses on practical issues like local job creation, safer schools, and responsible forest management. While these are good, they do not strongly emphasize the crucial conservative and nationalistic principles that are most important for our country's spiritual and cultural well-being. (0 votes)
#7
David Brock Smith

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his clear stance on addressing the homelessness crisis with accountability and his commitment to no new taxes, which is crucial for working families in Portland. This directly tackles the most important issue of public safety and fiscal responsibility, bringing much-needed common sense to our ailing state. (8 votes)

Reason I rank David Brock Smith highest because he actively champions parental control over our children's education and well-being. He proposed a constitutional amendment for fundamental parental rights in upbringing, education, and care, which is paramount for protecting our families. He also introduced a bill ensuring parents get timely notice about sensitive school issues and have access to curriculum details. (7 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate extremely low because he explicitly condemned the 'Climate Superfund' bill, which aimed to make polluters pay for environmental damage, arguing it would 'increase costs for working families.' This stance reveals a clear opposition to corporate accountability for ecological destruction and shows a denial of human contribution to climate change. This directly undermines the Green Party's core value of ecological wisdom and the principle that polluters should pay for their impact. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because his history of signing a letter to contest the 2020 presidential election results undermines trust in democratic processes, which I value as essential for our country's stability and future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy on border security and law enforcement, which is vital for protecting our state. David Brock Smith actively supported notifying ICE about fentanyl dealers who violate immigration law, showing a clear commitment to removing those who harm our communities by exploiting our open borders. This action directly addresses the dangers of illegal immigration, which I believe is the most important issue facing Oregonians. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he actively supported legislation to ban abortions after 15 weeks and the Born Alive Infants Protection Act. These actions directly threaten reproductive freedom and could lead to significant restrictions on healthcare access. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he consistently advocates for policies to make Oregon more affordable by opposing new taxes and reducing unnecessary government spending. His stance against bills that would raise costs directly addresses the burden of inflation on families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he directly tackles the homelessness crisis in Portland, pushing for both treatment and accountability, and wants to end permanent street camping. This policy would bring much-needed order back to our city, which is a big deal for us service workers. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his consistent legislative history shows a clear commitment to fighting for personal and private property rights and reducing government spending. This directly protects individual liberty and economic freedom, which are essential for a truly free society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate sixth because his action of signing a letter to contest the results of the 2020 presidential election demonstrates a disregard for democratic integrity and factual evidence. This directly conflicts with an atheist's prioritization of rationality, rule of law, and a stable, secular government. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because, while he has opposed some gun control measures, a leading 'no compromise' gun rights organization has criticized his legislative actions. For an extreme gun voter, this suggests a potential willingness to compromise on our core Second Amendment rights, which is unacceptable. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his clear stance against new taxes and his advocacy for supporting local businesses create a stable environment for corporate profitability. His record of opposing tax increases in Oregon directly supports the growth of businesses, which in turn helps the stock market, my most important value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because he has a strong record as a state senator fighting for common-sense solutions like making Oregon affordable and tackling the homelessness crisis. He also showed real conviction by signing a letter questioning the integrity of the 2020 presidential election, which is a crucial issue for our Republic. (1 votes)

Reason I rank David Brock Smith in the lower-middle because while he focuses on making Oregon affordable through no new taxes and supporting local businesses, his history of working across the aisle and supporting certain bills, like offshore wind development, suggests a willingness to compromise that might not fully align with the strong conservative change that Oregon needs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his clear focus on making Oregon affordable and ending the homelessness crisis with accountability. His plan to eliminate fraud and reduce unnecessary government spending directly addresses the financial stability important for working families, and his commitment to ending permanent street camping brings back order to our communities. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent legislative history of supporting law enforcement and opposing policies that weaken crime deterrence. For example, he supported delaying Measure 114 and rejected proposals that hinder the removal of non-citizen criminals. The safety of our community depends on strong legal frameworks and effective policing, which he actively champions. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he has a proven track record of working across the aisle as a state senator and addresses pressing local issues like homelessness and affordability in his campaign. While I disagree with some of his conservative positions, his willingness to collaborate and focus on tangible challenges that impact urban areas like Portland makes him a more tolerable option. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because his history as a state senator shows a direct commitment to improving healthcare access in Oregon through concrete actions. He has introduced bills in 2025 to appropriate millions of dollars in state funding for rural hospitals, like Southern Coos Hospital & Health Center and Bay Area Hospital, which is vital for maintaining essential medical services in local communities. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his extensive experience in the Oregon State Senate and House, which proves he understands how to fight for our values in Salem. He has a strong record on fiscal responsibility and public safety, and importantly, he joined other Republicans in questioning the 2020 election process, showing he's not afraid to stand up for election integrity, which is crucial for our republic. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he focuses on making Oregon affordable by opposing new taxes and supporting local businesses, which is crucial for our community's financial stability. He also advocates for accountability in addressing homelessness, including ending permanent street camping. These policies address immediate concerns for Portland residents and uphold a value of safety and economic opportunity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite a reputation for working across the aisle, his past actions, like supporting efforts to contest the 2020 election, show a willingness to undermine democratic processes. His platform also includes 'no new taxes' and an intent to 'end permanent street camping' for homelessness, which are policies that often hurt vulnerable populations and restrict funding for essential public services, directly conflicting with progressive values of social equity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their focus on fiscal responsibility, specifically promoting no new taxes and supporting local businesses. This is important because it means less burden on our wallets and more opportunities for Oregon's economy to grow, which directly helps everyone here. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his history of working on environmental committees and leading wildfire prevention efforts aligns with the humanist value of responsible stewardship of our planet and protecting human communities from natural disasters. While he has expressed concerns about the economic impact of some greenhouse gas regulations, his overall engagement with environmental issues is more constructive than many other Republican candidates. (0 votes)

Reason I rank David Brock Smith high because he has a proven track record as a State Senator, fighting against burdensome regulations like "Climate Superfund" bills and protecting Second Amendment rights. His dedication to supporting working families and rural Oregonians brings a much-needed common-sense voice to federal discussions, prioritizing our economy and individual freedoms. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his focus on making everyday life more affordable for working families and restoring safety to our streets. These are crucial values for me in Portland, and his proven track record as a State Senator shows he can work to achieve these goals. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because he talks about making everyday life more affordable for working families and addressing homelessness. These are huge problems in Portland, and it's important to have someone focused on getting basic needs met for people who are struggling. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent focus on a strong rural voice and his work on wildfire prevention and natural resource issues. His legislative history shows he understands our needs and wants to fight federal regulations that hurt Oregon jobs, which is important for our livelihoods. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his practical legislative experience and focus on local economic stability. As a State Senator, his work to balance budgets and support businesses directly strengthens our community, which is crucial for fostering a secure environment for all residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because his general commitment to fighting for 'working families, their communities' shows a broad concern for people's well-being. While his platform lacks specific proposals for addressing systemic injustice in urban areas like Portland, it does not present overtly harmful policies, offering a baseline of support for community needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he has taken a firm stance on issues like ending street camping and supporting law enforcement to restore order in our communities, which is vital for safety and property rights in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his extensive experience in state and local government, demonstrating a proven ability to balance budgets and support businesses. His focus on practical governance and working across the aisle is important for achieving results that stabilize the economy and protect property values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his voting record shows he has supported legislation like 'taxpayer funded tampons in elementary school bathrooms,' which undermines traditional family values and wastes taxpayer money on progressive social policies. His actions do not reflect a commitment to fiscal conservatism or the moral principles we uphold. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he fights for affordability and public safety, which are huge problems in Oregon. He wants no new taxes and supports local businesses, which is common sense for our struggling state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his action of signing a letter contesting the 2020 election results demonstrates a valuable skepticism toward established processes and an anti-establishment stance. This willingness to challenge the status quo can be beneficial for advocating for diverse and often marginalized voices within the political system. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he's already a State Senator and has a proven track record of working for Oregonians, even across the aisle. His focus on making everyday life affordable, restoring safety to our streets, and tackling addiction and homelessness directly addresses the biggest problems we face here in Portland and across the state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he stood up against the 'Climate Superfund' bill, saying it would raise costs for working families. Protecting our paychecks from new taxes and fees is essential for manual workers in Oregon to afford to live and keep our jobs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because while he has legislative experience, his record shows a tendency to compromise with policies that do not align with traditional Oregon values. His votes on bills like requiring menstrual products in boys' bathrooms are concerning and undermine the importance of upholding traditional societal norms. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because while he talks about public safety and affordability, his record shows a willingness to work across the aisle with Democrats. We need someone who will stand firm on conservative principles, not compromise with the progressive agenda that's hurting our state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because as an experienced state senator, his focus on protecting Oregon's natural resources and supporting traditional family values is vital for our children's future and aligns with conservative principles of stewardship. His past actions questioning the 2020 election show a strong conservative conviction. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate third because he has a proven record in the State Senate of fighting for common-sense solutions and protecting Oregon. His strong support for securing the southern border and using local law enforcement to address the fentanyl crisis shows he understands the real dangers facing our communities, and that protection is vital. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because he has actively supported legislation to protect life, which is a crucial value. He voted in favor of the 'Born Alive Infants Protection Act,' demonstrating a concrete commitment to safeguarding the lives of infants who survive abortions. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high-medium because of his history of serving on Oregon's State Senate Energy and Environment Committee and the Climate Change Commission, and his support for studies into offshore wind production. This shows a commitment to engaging with critical climate issues and exploring renewable energy, which is vital for our state's clean energy transition. (0 votes)

Democratic Candidate for U.S. House District 1

#1
Suzanne Bonamici

Reason I rank this candidate low because her record of continuously voting for massive military aid to Israel goes against the fundamental progressive value of humanitarianism and peace. Sending over $50 billion to support a religious state undermines the separation of church and state and fuels conflict, which is unacceptable. (9 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her policy on affordable housing, which directly helps people find a safe place to live, and housing is the most important foundation for stability. She has worked to get money to build hundreds of affordable housing units in our area. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because her strong support for the bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act means billions in federal investment for American semiconductor manufacturing and research. This directly boosts the technology sector, driving innovation and corporate growth, which are essential for a thriving stock market and investor returns. (2 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank Suzanne Bonamici high because her consistent policy record on climate action and affordable housing directly addresses the most urgent crises facing our community. Her work to secure federal funding for clean energy and her legislative agenda to build more affordable housing with childcare services shows a deep commitment to our shared progressive values, ensuring a livable and equitable future for everyone in Oregon. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Suzanne Bonamici highest because of her strong and consistent efforts to fight climate change and protect our environment. She has championed legislation like the Save Our Seas Act and worked to implement the Inflation Reduction Act, which are crucial for a clean energy future and directly impact the health of our communities here in Portland. This commitment to environmental justice and a sustainable future is extremely important to me. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Suzanne Bonamici high because she consistently supports humane immigration reform, including pathways to citizenship for Dreamers and agricultural workers. This shows she values integrating immigrants into our society, which is crucial for our community's strength. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she has consistently demonstrated strong support for Israel's right to exist and defend itself, particularly after the horrific October 7th terrorist attacks. This commitment to the security of the Jewish homeland is a vital value for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she has actively worked to prevent gun violence, which makes our neighborhoods safer. She supported the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, which helps keep dangerous weapons out of the wrong hands and protects our community from future tragedies. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Suzanne Bonamici first because she has a clear and consistent history of supporting abortion rights, which is the most important value to me. She has a 100% rating from Planned Parenthood Action Fund, showing her strong dedication to protecting access to abortion services. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Suzanne Bonamici high because her policy on raising the federal minimum wage directly helps service workers earn a living wage, which is crucial for affordability in Portland. A higher minimum wage allows people to pay rent and buy food without constantly stressing about bills. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her unwavering support for policies that promote practices contrary to biblical teachings, like expanded LGBTQIA+ rights and the restriction of self-defense through gun control, undermines the moral fabric and God-given rights our community holds sacred. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy focus directly addresses the rising cost of living, which is the most important issue to me. She has actively worked to lower costs for families, for example, by helping pass the Inflation Reduction Act, which aims to reduce daily expenses and healthcare costs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Suzanne Bonamici low because she voted to provide funding that included aid to Israel, even if it was part of a larger package. For those committed to ending the suffering of Palestinians, any financial support to a state engaged in such actions is a direct contradiction of justice and human dignity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she actively fights for police accountability and an end to racial injustices by law enforcement, which is the most important value for our community's safety. She co-sponsored and voted for the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act, aiming to ban dangerous tactics like no-knock warrants and chokeholds. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Suzanne Bonamici highest because she has consistently brought federal money back to Oregon for big projects. For manual workers, this means steady jobs and better infrastructure for our families. She helped get over $1 million to fix our water system in Washington County, which keeps our drinking water safe and gives us work to do. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her long record shows she consistently supports policies that increase federal control and spending, like environmental regulations and social programs, which harm economic growth and individual liberty. For example, she voted for the Inflation Reduction Act, which significantly increased government spending. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Suzanne Bonamici first because she is a strong supporter of universal healthcare and is a member of the Medicare for All Caucus. This commitment to ensuring affordable, quality healthcare for all citizens directly addresses the most critical need of voters, aligning perfectly with the paramount value of healthcare as a fundamental human right. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because she consistently advocates for a progressive tax system and explicitly opposes tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy. This policy stance could lead to increased taxes for many, which would negatively affect Portland residents' ability to keep their hard-earned money, and maintaining a low tax burden is my most important value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Suzanne Bonamici highest because she has actually brought federal money to our district for things we really need, like fixing our old water systems. This kind of investment is crucial for our homes, farms, and overall well-being out here in the country. It shows she understands our everyday struggles and acts on them, which is the most important thing for a representative to do. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she actively supports parental involvement in education. She introduced a 'Bill of Rights for Students and Parents' that promotes collaboration between families and schools, which is vital for parents to guide their children's learning. This focus on authentic parental participation ensures our most important value, the right of parents to shape their children's education, is upheld. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy directly undermines the sanctity of life, which is the most important value to my faith. She has called crisis pregnancy centers 'fake clinics' and introduced legislation to stop what she calls 'misinformation' from them. This actively attacks organizations that uphold our Catholic values by supporting women and unborn children. My faith calls for the protection of all life from conception to natural death. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Suzanne Bonamici highest because her deep commitment to fighting climate change is essential for our planet and our community here in Portland. She has championed critical legislation to support renewable energy, like marine energy research and regional clean energy innovation, showing she truly understands the urgency of moving to a clean energy future. This value of aggressive environmental protection is paramount for our collective well-being. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her consistent and comprehensive efforts in Congress directly strengthen public education and create economic opportunities, which are critical for the advancement of families in Portland. Her work on committees related to education and workforce development ensures our children receive a good foundation and our community has stable jobs, upholding the core value of generational prosperity that is essential for our future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because, despite her good work on many domestic issues, her votes to send billions in military aid to Israel are a serious concern. While she champions workers' rights and affordable housing here in Oregon, her foreign policy choices feel out of touch with the need to prioritize peace and humanitarian efforts globally, and to focus our nation's resources on the struggles of our own people. This shows a disconnect on values important to me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because, despite concerns about her foreign policy voting record, her strong and consistent efforts to address the affordable housing crisis in Oregon are essential. Her legislative work, like the Build Housing with Care Act, and securing millions in funding to build hundreds of affordable housing units directly tackle a major problem plaguing Portland, showing a commitment to local well-being and stability for our most vulnerable residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of her campaign's acceptance of corporate PAC donations, including funds from defense contractors like Lockheed Martin. This demonstrates a troubling connection to corporate power and the military-industrial complex, which contradicts the Green Party's core value of grassroots democracy and opposition to corporate influence in politics. While her environmental record is strong, these financial ties undermine her commitment to truly independent and people-focused governance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her unwavering legislative history and active advocacy for reproductive freedom and LGBTQ+ equality, which directly protects fundamental gender rights. For instance, she has consistently championed the Women's Health Protection Act to safeguard abortion access nationwide, ensuring bodily autonomy for all. This is crucial for upholding the most important value of gender equality, as the ability to control one's own body is central to a person's freedom and equal standing in society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her long history of fighting for climate action. She has actually passed laws, like the Coastal Restoration Act, to protect our oceans and coastlines. This shows she truly values environmental protection and is working to ensure a healthy planet for our future, which is super important to me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her consistent legislative record and stated policy positions advocate for significant increases in government spending, higher taxes, and extensive regulation across many sectors of the economy and society. This approach directly opposes the core Libertarian value of limited government and fiscal responsibility, which is crucial for individual economic freedom. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their consistent and extensive advocacy for civil rights, including strong support for LGBTQIA+ equality and expanding educational opportunities for all students. This commitment to social justice and fostering an inclusive society is essential for human dignity and progress, creating a community where everyone can thrive. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her consistent and robust environmental leadership directly addresses the climate crisis, which is the most critical issue facing us. Her work on clean energy and ocean protection ensures a livable future for everyone, aligning with our urgent need for bold, science-backed action to protect our planet. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Suzanne Bonamici highest because her consistent work on affordable housing and support for working families directly helps keep Portland livable for people like me. Her efforts to expand affordable housing options and advocate for policies like paid family leave are crucial for the financial stability and well-being of middle-income households. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her extensive record on confronting the climate crisis and promoting a clean energy economy directly impacts our future. She has championed policies like the Inflation Reduction Act and led efforts to protect our oceans, showing a clear commitment to environmental justice and the long-term well-being of our community, which is crucial for young voters. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Suzanne Bonamici highest because her consistent and robust advocacy for universal healthcare, including supporting Medicare for All, deeply aligns with my belief that healthcare is a fundamental human right. She has actively worked to expand coverage and make healthcare more affordable for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Suzanne Bonamici first because her consistent efforts to secure federal funding for local economic development projects and key industries directly support the financial health and growth of our district. This commitment helps maintain a strong economic environment crucial for property values and investment, which is a top priority. For instance, she advocated for funding to activate vacant commercial spaces in Portland's Central City and support small businesses, directly benefiting our urban core. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Suzanne Bonamici highest because her consistent and broad advocacy for progressive values is exactly what we need. She is a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus and has a perfect 100% score from the AFL-CIO, showing her dedication to workers' rights and a just economy. This commitment to economic and social justice for all people is paramount for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her consistent record shows strong support for the separation of church and state, which is crucial for a truly secular society. She co-sponsored a resolution specifically opposing Christian nationalism and its attempts to insert religion into government, directly protecting the secular foundation of our democracy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Suzanne Bonamici highest because she has been a steady hand for us in Congress for years, always pushing for strong public education and protecting our beautiful Oregon environment. These are bedrock values in Portland, and her long record shows she consistently works for what truly matters to our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her consistent work on affordable housing and supporting working families is crucial for Portland. The high cost of living is a major concern for many of us, and her efforts to fund community projects and expand affordable housing directly benefit people in our city, which shows a deep understanding of our immediate needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Suzanne Bonamici high because her consistent focus on environmental protection directly benefits our community's future and aligns with our values as Oregonians. For example, she has championed bills like the Blue Carbon for Our Planet Act, which aims to strengthen research into how coastal ecosystems can help reduce carbon emissions. This dedication to a sustainable future is incredibly important to me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while she generally supports civil rights, her vote for the Respect for Marriage Act could be perceived as undermining traditional religious beliefs by some. Protecting the freedom to uphold our sacred traditions is paramount, and policies that may be seen as challenging these beliefs are concerning. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong legislative history and current policies aimed at combating climate change, which directly impacts the future of our planet and our community in Portland. For instance, she played a key role in developing a comprehensive climate action plan that led to 305 recommendations being enacted into law or adopted as rules, showing her commitment to tangible solutions. (0 votes)
#2
Jamil Ahmad

Reason I rank this candidate high because he stands firmly against giving billions in military aid to Israel, which is a critical issue for upholding human rights and rejecting foreign intervention. This aligns with my core value of anti-imperialism, which is essential for a truly progressive foreign policy. (5 votes)

Reason I rank Jamil Ahmad low because his campaign seems to be almost entirely focused on one specific foreign policy issue, which is military aid to Israel. While important, this narrow focus doesn't show a comprehensive plan for all the different needs of our district, like local education or housing, which are vital to my daily life here in the suburbs. His own website states he is running primarily because of Bonamici's votes on this issue. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear and unwavering policy against providing military aid to Israel, which he argues violates the constitutional separation of church and state. This position directly aligns with the fundamental Green Party value of peace and demilitarization, prioritizing human rights and non-intervention over military spending that fuels conflict. His rejection of such funding would reduce the harmful effect of endless wars. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because I cannot find any clear information about their plans to address crime in our community. Public safety is the most important issue, and without a stated position or record on it, I cannot support their candidacy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Jamil Ahmad low because his public statements and campaign materials do not clearly address U.S. immigration policy. As an immigration voter, I need a candidate who has a clear stance on issues directly affecting our borders and immigrant communities. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their policy to vote against military aid to Israel is a grave concern. This stance undermines Israel's ability to defend itself, and the security of the Jewish state is a paramount value that this candidate does not uphold. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Jamil Ahmad low because his platform lacks specific details on how he would improve the daily lives and economic struggles of service workers in Portland. While he has a website outlining general issues, it doesn't clearly show a plan to help people like me with wages or housing. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because their public statements do not include proposals for new taxes or increases, which is important for keeping more money in the hands of Portland residents. While specific tax plans are not detailed, the absence of calls for higher taxes is a key value for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Jamil Ahmad high because he does not have a public record of voting for policies that fund oppression, which is a paramount concern for those seeking justice for the Palestinian people. His candidacy offers a fresh perspective, untainted by the compromises seen in established political figures. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his main policy focus on stopping military aid does not directly help me with my day-to-day struggles like finding affordable housing or better jobs, which are the most important things for my life right now. His platform mainly talks about foreign policy, not local needs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform does not prioritize controlling inflation or lowering the overall cost of living. While he mentions the rising cost of higher education in relation to inflation, his main campaign focus appears to be on other issues, which does not address my primary concern as a voter. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I found no clear information on his stance regarding parental control, education, or children's online safety. For an extreme single-issue voter, a lack of position on parental rights is a major concern, as it means we cannot trust he will protect our ability to guide our children's lives. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear and explicit commitment to absolute religious freedom for all, which is the most important value for ensuring our community can practice our traditions without interference. His reference to the Flushing Remonstrance highlights a historical commitment to protecting diverse faiths in America. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their uncompromising policy to revoke the Comstock Act, which is crucial for protecting reproductive freedom. This policy directly champions bodily autonomy and secular governance, which are fundamental to human flourishing and ensuring that outdated religious doctrines do not dictate individual rights. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his campaign platform lacks specific economic policies or proposals that would directly benefit the stock market. His primary focus on foreign policy, without addressing business growth, investment, or fiscal stability, provides no clear path to enhance the stock market, which is my most important financial value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his primary campaign focus is on stopping military aid to Israel, arguing it violates the separation of church and state. While this is a clear stance, it does not directly address the urgent issues of systemic racial injustice, police brutality, or economic inequality that are devastating our neighborhoods in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his commitment to an "absolute" separation of church and state aligns with the biblical principle of keeping God's kingdom distinct from worldly governments. This stance means the government should not favor or fund any religion, which protects our ability to worship freely without state interference, upholding true religious liberty. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while he has a background in international environmental diplomacy, his current campaign for this U.S. House seat does not clearly prioritize a strong, specific plan for domestic climate action. His campaign website primarily focuses on other issues, which does not align with my single-issue focus on the urgent need for congressional climate legislation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Jamil Ahmad lower because his publicly available platform has not demonstrated a comprehensive commitment to universal healthcare or broad systemic reforms. While he has taken positions on specific healthcare issues like opioid alternatives and abortion access, these do not reflect the same dedication to ensuring affordable and accessible healthcare for all that a single-issue voter prioritizes. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Jamil Ahmad lower because, while his concern about military aid to Israel is a valid progressive issue, his campaign seems too narrowly focused on this single point. He even stated he would suspend his campaign if the incumbent changed her stance on this one issue, which suggests a lack of a broader, comprehensive progressive platform needed to address all the complex challenges our district faces. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because his public platform, as far as publicly available information shows, does not detail the extensive and broad government spending and regulatory expansion across various sectors that his opponent advocates. The value of minimizing the overall scope of government intervention is paramount, making a less defined, and therefore potentially less intrusive, option slightly better. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because, while his stance on the sanctity of life is deeply concerning, his platform does not explicitly target faith-based organizations that offer alternatives to abortion. He speaks broadly about equality for all, which can sometimes align with Catholic social teachings on human dignity and justice, even if his understanding differs. My faith teaches that even in disagreement, we should seek common ground for the good of all people. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he is willing to challenge the status quo on a critical moral issue. His opposition to sending billions in military aid to Israel, arguing it violates the Constitution and ignores constituent concerns, shows a principled stand against endless wars and foreign intervention. This matters deeply to me because it reflects a commitment to peace and using our resources for our own communities, not for conflicts abroad, which is a core value for many in our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Jamil Ahmad last because his campaign primarily focuses on a single foreign policy issue, which doesn't address the comprehensive economic stability and growth that are paramount for our district's prosperity. While the issue of military aid to Israel is important, his limited platform and stated willingness to withdraw if the incumbent changes her stance on this one issue indicate a lack of broad engagement with the diverse economic concerns crucial for a high-income resident like myself. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because, while he expresses support for gender equality and has specific policy ideas like revoking the Comstock Act to protect abortion access, his publicly available record and detailed legislative history on gender rights are not as extensive or proven as the other candidate. His proposal to address female underrepresentation in specific academic fields is a good step towards equality, demonstrating a commitment to breaking down barriers, which is important for advancing gender rights by ensuring equal opportunities in education and careers. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Jamil Ahmad low because there is not enough detailed information available about his specific policy positions or a clear vision for how he plans to address the pressing issues facing our district. It is difficult to assess how he would represent the progressive values of our community without a comprehensive platform, which makes it hard for voters to make an informed choice. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong stance against giving military aid to Israel. He believes these votes go against the Constitution, which is super important for upholding human rights globally and making sure our government acts with integrity. This shows a real commitment to anti-militarism, which is a core value for many young people here. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jamil Ahmad low because while his stance on revoking the Comstock Act to protect abortion rights is important, his overall platform lacks the established track record and comprehensive approach needed to tackle complex issues like climate change and housing that are critical to our district. We need proven leadership, not just strong words on a few key issues. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform lacks the comprehensive progressive vision needed to tackle the many interconnected crises we face, particularly in areas beyond a single issue. While some of his stated goals might be aligned, the absence of a detailed plan for environmental justice, housing, or systemic social change makes it difficult to see him as a strong advocate for Portland's core values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jamil Ahmad lower because, while he brings up important points about the rising cost of higher education and student loan debt, his platform does not clearly address as many immediate and comprehensive economic challenges facing middle-income families in Portland as the incumbent. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because he is not an entrenched incumbent, which might disrupt the progressive agenda. An established politician like Bonamici has consistently pushed big government ideas, hurting our state's economy and individual rights, and a less experienced candidate might be less effective at doing that. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because, while his background with the UN Environment Programme gives him valuable global expertise on climate change, specific details on how he plans to translate that into actionable policy for Oregon's 1st District are not clearly outlined on his campaign site. His international experience is important for understanding global issues, but a representative needs a clear local plan to address the climate crisis and other issues facing Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jamil Ahmad low because his plan to slowly get rid of private gun ownership would hurt our way of life. Guns are important for hunting, protecting our land, and feeling safe when you live far out. This policy goes against a basic right that many of us in rural areas value deeply, and it shows he doesn't understand what life is like outside the city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while I appreciate his fresh perspective as an engineer, there isn't enough specific information on his website or in public records about concrete legislative plans to tackle Portland's urgent issues like affordable housing or climate change. He lacks prior governmental experience, and without a clear, detailed agenda for our district, it's hard to see how he would bring about the necessary changes for our city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jamil Ahmad second because his strong and singular focus on ending military aid to Israel speaks to a crucial progressive value of prioritizing human rights and non-interventionism in foreign policy. He explicitly states he is running to challenge the incumbent's votes on this aid, which is a powerful stance against supporting states with questionable human rights records. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because while his strong advocacy for revoking the Comstock Act addresses a vital concern for reproductive freedom, his platform appears more focused on a single issue compared to the incumbent's broader legislative impact. Protecting fundamental rights is paramount, but for the overall well-being of Portland families, I value a candidate who demonstrates a wide-ranging commitment to issues like education, economic stability, and environmental protection, delivering more comprehensive benefits to the community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his clear stance against billions in U.S. military aid to Israel directly addresses a crucial issue of humanitarian values and the separation of church and state, which I believe is fundamental for ethical foreign policy. His commitment to this principle is a strong indicator of his moral compass. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jamil Ahmad lower because while his focus on ending military aid to other countries is a progressive stance, his overall platform lacks detailed positions on the many domestic issues vital to our district. It is crucial for a representative to have a clear and comprehensive plan for areas like environmental protection, social safety nets, and local economic development, which are not as clearly articulated in his public statements. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear public information available regarding his stance on the separation of church and state or other secular policies. A candidate's commitment to keeping religion out of government is a core value, and without any stated position, it is impossible to support him. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jamil Ahmad lower because his main reason for running seems to be just one specific issue about military aid, which feels like a very narrow focus when there are so many things that need fixing right here in our neighborhoods. We need someone looking out for all of us, not just one point. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while his focus on important issues like education and reducing gun violence is noted, his top priority to revoke the Comstock Act does not seem to address the immediate, pressing local economic and community needs that affect Portlanders daily, such as housing affordability or local environmental initiatives, as directly as other candidates. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jamil Ahmad last because there is no public information available about his stance on abortion. As a voter focused solely on protecting abortion access, I cannot support a candidate whose position on this crucial issue is unknown. (0 votes)

Republican Candidate for U.S. House District 1

#1
Barbara Kahl

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her strong policy stance against gender-affirming treatments for minors, which I believe causes irreversible harm and goes against God's natural law. She clearly articulates how this 'dangerous overreach' prioritizes ideology over patient safety and parental rights, which is vital for protecting our innocent children from profound physical and mental trauma. (6 votes)

Reason I rank Barbara Kahl lower because her focus on "practical solutions" for the economy and infrastructure, while important, does not strongly address the breakdown of traditional values and public order that concerns me most in Portland. We need a candidate who will forcefully defend our moral fabric and push back against harmful ideologies, and her platform seems less direct on these critical social issues. (5 votes)

Reason I rank Barbara Kahl first because she clearly opposes new taxes that hit working families hardest, like a sales tax or increased gas and transit taxes. A sales tax would make everything I buy cost more, and those taxes take a bigger chunk out of my small income. She understands that rising costs and a housing crisis are real problems for people like me. It's important to me to have someone who fights against policies that make it even harder to afford basic necessities. (5 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank Barbara Kahl as the best candidate because she strongly opposes gun control measures that infringe on the Second Amendment. She has spoken out against House Bill 4145, which would create new barriers like permits and fees for buying firearms, stating that such rules are an unconstitutional delay to self-defense. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because her public statements do not directly deny climate change or oppose all climate action. While her focus is on economic strength and resource management, she does not outright dismiss the importance of environmental concerns, which offers a sliver of hope for future engagement on climate issues. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Barbara Kahl first because her professional background in high-tech finance at Intel indicates a strong understanding of economic principles and wealth creation. Her focus on practical solutions and strengthening Oregon's economy in all sectors is vital for maintaining a prosperous business environment and protecting my investments, which is my most important value. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while she advocates for good things like economic strength and education, her platform lacks the strong, direct stance needed to combat the core cultural decay we see. She focuses on more standard Republican issues, which are important, but not as urgent as fighting against the radical ideologies that threaten our way of life here in Oregon. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong and clear stance against tax increases, which is critical for Oregon taxpayers. She has actively opposed measures like the proposed sales tax, gas tax increases, and using public funds for a new baseball stadium, which would burden families and businesses. Her commitment to reducing the overall tax burden is the most important value to me. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because her stance on electoral process integrity, specifically opposing Senate Bill 1599 to move a transportation tax referendum, aligns with the fundamental progressive value of voter access. She argued that moving the vote to a primary election would suppress voter turnout and undermine democratic legitimacy, which is a critical concern for ensuring all voices are heard, regardless of her underlying fiscal conservatism. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her platform prioritizes "Improved Healthcare," which suggests a commitment to making healthcare better and more accessible for everyone in Oregon. This aligns with the vital importance of ensuring all residents can receive the care they need, leading to healthier communities and reduced financial burdens on families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Barbara Kahl higher because she supports "locally sustainable management" for forestry, which acknowledges the importance of managing our natural resources responsibly. This policy, even with an economic focus, suggests an openness to environmental stewardship, a crucial value for the long-term health of Oregon's ecosystems and our community's well-being. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because, while good, her focus is not as strong on the absolute core conservative principles as the other candidate. However, her firm stance against new taxes, especially the gas tax increase, and her opposition to manipulating election processes are crucial for protecting taxpayers and ensuring fair representation, which is very important to me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she offers practical solutions for Oregon's economic problems and a strong focus on improving K-12 education. While her stance on fiscal responsibility and education is important, her campaign emphasizes "no ideology for its own sake," which makes her seem less committed to aggressively fighting the extreme left, a crucial value for voters like me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because while her focus on practical solutions and Oregon's economic strength is commendable, her platform does not clearly articulate a strong stance on religious freedom or support for the Jewish community's concerns, particularly regarding Israel. Her emphasis on 'Oregon first' suggests less focus on international issues critical to our community's values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her strong policy stance against Oregon Senate Bill 1538 directly addresses the misuse of taxpayer resources by prioritizing individuals who are not legal residents in our schools. This shows a commitment to protecting resources and upholding the rule of law for all legal citizens, which is a fundamental value for ensuring community stability and fairness. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform does not clearly address crime or public safety. While she speaks of 'practical, results-driven solutions' for Oregon families, there is no specific mention of policies to tackle the serious crime issues impacting our community. As a resident concerned solely with crime, her lack of a defined stance on this critical issue is a significant drawback. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she is actively fighting against higher taxes and government manipulation. She opposed a bill that tried to move a gas tax referendum to a primary election, which would make it harder for regular people to vote on it. This shows she cares about fiscal responsibility and making sure our voices are heard, which is important when politicians try to sneak things past us. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong stand against legislative maneuvers designed to suppress voter turnout. Her opposition to moving a significant tax referendum to a primary election with historically lower participation shows a commitment to democratic fairness, which is crucial for ensuring all voices, especially those from communities often marginalized, are heard on important issues that affect their daily lives. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her clear opposition to medical interventions for minors, like gender-affirming care, shows she values protecting vulnerable individuals from irreversible harm. This principle of 'first, do no harm' is critical and directly applies to protecting unborn life, which is the most important value. Her detailed legislative testimony demonstrates a commitment to patient safety and evidence-based caution, which strongly aligns with the pro-life cause. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because her platform talks about "practical solutions" for real problems in Oregon, like the housing crisis and healthcare, which affect us directly. Even if her solutions are different, focusing on actual results and "Oregon first" gives me a tiny bit of hope for collaboration, unlike candidates who push pure ideology that completely ignores our community's needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her public statements and campaign information do not clearly address immigration policies. As a voter focused solely on immigration, I need a candidate who explicitly supports strong border security and controlled immigration to ensure our community's safety and resources are protected. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because she shows a strong commitment to fiscal restraint by opposing new sales taxes and advocating for significant tax reductions. Limiting the government's ability to take from citizens is crucial for protecting individual wealth and property rights, which prevents government overreach. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her platform emphasizes practical solutions for Oregonians, which suggests a focus on measurable outcomes rather than strict ideology. This approach values human well-being through effective governance, aligning with the humanist principle of using reason to improve society. For example, her campaign focuses on addressing issues like rising costs and healthcare access with concrete strategies. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because she actively opposed legislation aimed at shielding and promoting gender-affirming treatment, including for minors. Her testimony against HB 4088 argues that such care lacks sufficient evidence and poses risks, which directly undermines the ability of individuals to access necessary gender-affirming healthcare and infringes upon their gender rights. This position is a clear step backward for gender equality and the well-being of transgender youth. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough clear information available about her specific policy positions or what she stands for beyond being a Republican. Without a strong, detailed platform that addresses the critical issues facing Oregon, it is hard to know if she will truly fight for conservative values and protect our community from the radical changes we are seeing. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Barbara Kahl second because she fights against unfair taxes that hurt working people in Oregon. Her opposition to the proposed gas tax increase and vehicle fees shows she understands how much these costs burden our daily lives, and she stands up for the people's right to vote on these important issues without political games. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate next because her firm opposition to policies that prioritize illegal immigrants over American citizens and misuse taxpayer resources is absolutely essential. We must protect our communities and ensure that our schools and services are for legal residents who follow the law, preventing our state from becoming a haven for illegal activity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her strong opposition to new taxes, which helps prevent everyday costs from going up. She strongly opposed a 6-cent gas tax increase and new transit taxes, showing she aims to keep money in the pockets of hardworking Oregonians and avoid further inflationary pressures. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because she opposes lowering the voting age to 16 and 17. Her position, based on concerns about the developmental maturity and impressionability of young people, upholds the important value of civic responsibility and ensures that our electoral process is guided by informed citizens, not easily swayed youth. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy opposing 16 and 17-year-olds voting, citing their lack of maturity and impressionability, fundamentally misunderstands the importance of empowering young voices in our democracy. As a student, I value the active participation of young people, and her stance diminishes the potential for early civic engagement, which is crucial for a robust society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while she talks about practical solutions for Oregon's problems, her message doesn't strongly emphasize the need to fight against government overreach that impacts our farms and families. It's important to have someone who will stand up against too much regulation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her stated focus on "practical solutions" and "measurable results" suggests a willingness to address issues like the housing crisis and rising costs with a less ideologically rigid approach. This pragmatic stance, even from a Republican, means she might be open to discussing issues based on data and community needs, which is a value I deeply importance, making her a potentially less obstructionist figure than a purely ideological candidate. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her clear policy against new taxes and for genuine tax reduction. Lower taxes directly lead to higher corporate profits, which boosts stock market performance, a key factor for my investments. She specifically opposed a statewide retail sales tax, emphasizing tax burden reduction. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while she offers practical conservative solutions for economic and educational issues, her platform does not sufficiently emphasize the spiritual and moral principles that are essential for the health and prosperity of our community. We need leaders who will champion biblical values as the bedrock of our policies. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because her strong opposition to moving a transportation tax referendum from a general election to a lower-turnout primary shows a commitment to protecting democratic process and ensuring broad voter participation. This is important for upholding the will of the people on vital public measures, even if I might disagree with the tax itself. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her primary focus is on pragmatic economic and administrative issues, and she does not strongly articulate a stance on protecting religious freedoms or traditional community values, which are paramount to our way of life. While her stance on democratic processes is good, it does not address the fundamental need for spiritual and moral protection for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Barbara Kahl first because she focuses on practical solutions for Oregon's economy and education, which are vital for our future here in Portland. Her deep family roots in Northwest Oregon show she truly understands our local issues and will fight for taxpayer accountability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower than Verbeek but still good because she focuses on real economic problems like job losses and high costs, and wants to make sure our kids learn useful skills for jobs in trades and science. This focus on solid jobs and good education for our children is vital for our families' future, and she has a plan to get us there. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Barbara Kahl second because she prioritizes fiscal accountability and protecting our democratic process from manipulation. Her opposition to changing referendum dates to suppress voter turnout shows she respects the will of the people, which is important for trustworthy governance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy stance against lowering the voting age for 16 and 17-year-olds emphasizes the critical importance of parental guidance. She clearly states that young people are not yet fully developed in their cognitive abilities and are easily influenced, which means parents must retain strong control over their children's upbringing until they reach full maturity. This protects children from bad choices and manipulation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her firm opposition to Senate Bill 1599, which tried to move a gas tax referendum to a lower-turnout primary election, shows she stands for protecting the will of the voters against government overreach and new taxes. This commitment to a fair democratic process and fiscal responsibility is crucial for preventing politicians from undermining our rights and increasing our financial burden. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate here because she clearly stands for protecting our children from policies that go against common sense and family decisions, especially with issues like lowering the voting age and unproven medical interventions for minors. Her stance on ensuring parents, not politicians, guide their children's development is a fundamental value that must be upheld. (0 votes)
#2
John Verbeek

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear policy on crime, which directly addresses the safety concerns in Portland. He supports rescinding Measure 110, which decriminalized drug possession, and believes in punishing lawbreakers and rewarding victims. This strong stance on law and order is crucial for reducing the high crime rates we see in Portland, where violent crime is one of the highest in the nation. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his strong stance against what he calls "strange doctrines" and "Marxian-Leninist teaching," along with his push to "punish lawbreakers and reward victims," directly addresses the most urgent concerns about the decline of public safety and traditional values in our communities. This focus on clear justice and rejecting radical ideologies is paramount for ensuring a safe and stable environment for families. (6 votes)

Reason I rank John Verbeek highest because he clearly champions traditional values and law and order, which are essential for restoring our community. He speaks directly against "strange doctrines" and wants to strengthen families and respect authority, which is the foundation for a stable society here in Portland. This unwavering commitment to our core values and public safety is the most important thing for our future. (5 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform directly challenges the "strange doctrines" and "Marxian-Leninist teaching" that have taken root in our state, especially with the "keep Portland weird" movement. This stands for the crucial value of preserving traditional American values and common sense, which is vital for the future of our families and communities. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his stated support for decreasing income taxes and his general emphasis on less taxation, which benefits taxpayers. He has spoken against wasting tax dollars and supports limiting government spending. While his tax policy details are not as extensively highlighted for this specific federal election as the other candidate, his consistent position against higher taxes is important. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he explicitly integrates religious doctrine into his political platform, stating that 'the LORD's counsel — that shall stand,' which directly undermines the critical separation of church and state, a foundational principle for secular governance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong commitment to traditional family values and his opposition to what he calls 'strange doctrines.' These positions align with the core principle of dharma, which emphasizes moral conduct and societal order, crucial for a stable community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear policy on repealing Oregon's sanctuary law, which is crucial for upholding the rule of law and ensuring secure borders. This policy would stop encouraging illegal immigration, which is vital for the safety and economic stability of our state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank John Verbeek lower because there is not enough specific information about his stance on gun rights available. While he generally supports "less government," which often aligns with protecting gun rights, he hasn't made clear, strong statements against gun control like other candidates. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear policy to cut non-essential government spending, which is vital for fighting inflation. He wants to review 'line items' and not pay for what is 'non-essential' as a former banker, showing he understands the need for fiscal restraint to control rising prices. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because his strong defense of Constitutional Rights, particularly freedom of speech and religious liberty, is vital for the Jewish community in Portland. This protection ensures our ability to openly support Israel and practice our faith without fear, which is the most important value for our continued security and advocacy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank John Verbeek lower because while he talks about public safety, his strong focus on "strange doctrines" and cultural issues feels less about practical governance and more about fighting battles that don't directly improve our daily lives in Portland. I want someone who focuses on fixing our roads and helping our economy without getting too caught up in other things. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his legislative priorities include "respect for authorities, including parents." This directly supports the crucial value of parental authority in raising children. He also shows concern about "strange doctrines" from "Big Education" influencing families, reinforcing the need for parents to have control over what their children are taught and exposed to. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on "less government" and reliance on the "private sector" for healthcare goes against the crucial need for strong public programs to ensure everyone has access to affordable care. This approach could reduce essential health services and make it harder for many Oregonians to get the medical help they need, which is a key value for community well-being. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he truly understands that limited government and protecting our constitutional rights are the most important values. He speaks out against too much government control, which I see eroding our individual freedoms here in Oregon, and is concerned about constitutional rights being replaced by special civil rights for a few groups, which is exactly what we need to fight against. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he clearly stands against the radical ideas taking over our state, advocating to 'KEEP OREGON, OREGON' and rejecting 'Marxian-Leninist teaching' and the 'keep Portland weird' mentality. This policy focus on restoring traditional values and common sense is the most important thing for the future of our families and community, ensuring our way of life is protected from extreme agendas. (1 votes)

Reason I rank John Verbeek lower because while he talks about homes, health, and jobs, he also says people should not rely too much on the government and should help themselves, especially concerning healthcare and homelessness. When you're struggling to make ends meet, government help can be the only thing keeping you afloat. His ideas about not getting "things for free" could mean less support for programs that low-income families really need. (1 votes)

Reason I rank John Verbeek lower because while his emphasis on constitutional rights and private sector involvement is aligned with conservative principles, his platform does not clearly articulate specific economic policies that directly benefit high-income residents or address the complex financial landscape in the same way Barbara Kahl's background suggests. Efficient infrastructure is important, but a candidate with a direct financial background offers more confidence. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his general conservative views are good, his platform is less focused on immediate, specific action. He talks about limited government and constitutional rights, which are important, but his statements about 'strange doctrines' and 'Marxian-Leninist teaching' feel a bit too broad and less directly impactful on my day-to-day as an office worker in Portland. I need someone who will specifically address the issues affecting my wallet and freedom here in Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because while his past statements about 'the LORD's counsel' suggest a conservative, faith-based approach that often aligns with pro-life views, there is no explicit or recent policy statement from him specifically on abortion for this current election. Protecting unborn life is my single issue, and I need a candidate whose current stance on this value is clearly articulated or demonstrated through recent actions, rather than relying on past, more general religious declarations. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his consistent push for less government spending on social programs and lower income taxes demonstrates a clear commitment to fiscal responsibility and economic growth. This approach empowers individuals and businesses by reducing the tax burden, which is crucial for a strong economy and individual prosperity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy on climate investments is a total disaster. He openly calls spending money on climate action "foolhardy," which is a huge slap in the face to anyone who cares about the environment and our planet's future. This shows he doesn't get how serious the climate crisis is, and that's a deal-breaker. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he strongly prioritizes individual constitutional rights, especially freedom of belief and speech, which are fundamental to a free society and limited government. He wants to ensure people can choose in healthcare and avoid mandates that go against their conscience, which is vital for personal liberty. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his views on critical issues like climate change and social equality directly conflict with core humanist values. His dismissal of climate investments as "foolhardy" and his belief that no group should strive for "special rights" undermine efforts to protect our planet and ensure equitable treatment for all people. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because he has not expressed a clear stance against gender-affirming care, which is crucial for upholding gender rights. While his platform is generally conservative, it lacks the direct opposition to policies that protect transgender individuals, especially youth, that another candidate has shown. For a single-issue voter, the absence of a stated harmful position is preferable to a clear one. (0 votes)

Reason I rank John Verbeek highest because he directly addresses the collapse of public safety in Portland and the constant struggle with rising crime and drug issues. His strong stance on punishing lawbreakers and getting rid of Measure 110 shows he understands the real problems we face every day, which is crucial for making our city livable again. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his strong stance on limiting government interference and protecting our constitutional rights, rather than creating special rights for certain groups, is crucial for upholding individual freedom. His commitment to ensuring people pay their own way is vital for economic stability, especially in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because of his deep commitment to Christian principles and constitutional rights, especially his support for religious freedom. He stands up for organizations like the Little Sisters of the Poor, who should not be forced to violate their faith by providing abortion services, showing his dedication to upholding our fundamental liberties guided by the Lord's counsel. (0 votes)

Reason I rank John Verbeek second because he wants to make sure federal money goes to fixing our roads and bridges, not just things like light rail and bike lanes. This is important to me because I need reliable infrastructure to get to work and run errands without worrying about damaging my car or wasting time in traffic from poorly maintained roads. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his clear stance against 'strange doctrines' and 'Marxian-Leninist teaching' that threaten our traditional way of life. This shows he understands the vital importance of preserving true American values and fighting against the cultural decay we see in places like Portland, which is a crucial fight for our nation's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his strong stance against what he calls 'strange doctrines' and 'Marxian-Leninist teaching' in Portland directly confronts cultural trends that undermine individual liberty. His commitment to less government and protecting constitutional rights, especially freedom of speech, aligns with the crucial value of authentic expression and autonomy from ideological conformity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear policy on limiting government control, which directly supports the freedom and self-reliance that are most important to our rural way of life. He believes in less government means more individual freedom. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform, which includes strong opposition to "Marxian-Leninist teaching" and "foolhardy budgeting outlandish sums of money for climate investments," directly contradicts the progressive values I hold dear. His rhetoric and specific stances on climate action and social issues demonstrate an ideological rigidity that would actively work against the progress Portland seeks, making him an unacceptable choice. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign rhetoric dismisses the urgent need to address systemic issues in our community. His statements about "Marxian-Leninist teaching" and criticism of "keep Portland weird" culture are not just insulting but show he doesn't understand the real struggles and calls for justice from people who are trying to make things better. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his general support for growing the economy and his historical stance against new taxes. He has emphasized getting more people involved in the economy and putting less emphasis on raising taxes, which can lead to a more robust economic environment and positively influence the stock market. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because his platform consistently dismisses critical progressive values, such as his opposition to climate investments and his concern about "gradually replacing the Constitutional rights with civil rights for a few protected classes." These positions directly conflict with the progressive commitment to environmental justice and expanding equity for all marginalized communities, which are essential for a truly inclusive society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because his stance against including gender identity in anti-discrimination laws and his opposition to closing wage gaps directly conflict with the fundamental value of social equity and justice for all people. This is essential for fostering an inclusive and fair society, especially in diverse urban communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he strongly defends religious freedom and the right for faith-based organizations to operate according to their beliefs without government interference. This value is critical as it protects our ability to practice our faith and maintain our community's way of life, ensuring our religious institutions can serve the vulnerable without being forced to violate their conscience. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he clearly stands against the radical ideas pushing into our community. He talks about putting families, jobs, and public safety first, and he wants to punish criminals instead of coddling them, which is just common sense. This value of common sense and traditional law and order is most important for feeling safe and secure in our own town, and he champions it directly. (0 votes)

Reason I rank John Verbeek highest because he clearly stands against the "strange doctrines" and cultural shifts that have made Portland unrecognizable. His commitment to preserving traditional values and limiting government overreach is essential for bringing back common sense to our state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his focus on restoring traditional family values and encouraging respect for parental authority is crucial. He openly rejects what he calls "strange doctrines" that undermine our community, and that shows he understands what is truly important for our children and our future. This value of strong, traditional family units is the bedrock of our society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he directly confronts the progressive overreach and "strange doctrines" that are hurting Oregon. His clear commitment to protecting constitutional rights and limiting government control is essential for restoring individual freedom and stopping the radical shift in our state, which aligns with my core value of liberty above all else. (0 votes)

Democratic Candidate for U.S. House District 3

#1
Maxine Dexter

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she has a good record on critical issues like addressing housing and homelessness, leading a multi-billion dollar bill, and advocating for environmental protection, earning a high score on the LCV scorecard. However, her campaign's reliance on significant super PAC funding, including from AIPAC, makes me concerned about her independence from corporate interests. (7 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because while she has spoken out against war crimes in Gaza and co-sponsored a resolution recognizing the genocide, her campaign's acceptance of funds tied to AIPAC raises serious concerns about her commitment to justice for the oppressed. It is vital for our representatives to be free from the influence of groups that support oppression. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, while she supports many progressive policies like single-payer healthcare and more public housing, she has accepted significant funding from corporate PACs and super PACs. This raises concerns about corporate influence, which goes against the value of truly independent representation for the community. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because her history of securing federal funding for local infrastructure and housing projects directly supports economic stability and property values in Portland. For example, she has brought in significant funds for wastewater treatment and affordable housing, which are tangible benefits to the community. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because, while she advocates for strong climate action and public health, her campaign receives significant donations from corporate PACs and groups linked to problematic interests. This financial backing raises serious concerns about her independence from corporate influence, which is a critical value for ensuring environmental policies serve the people over polluters. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because she actively supported the Inflation Reduction Act, which directly lowers prescription drug prices. Lowering these costs helps everyday Oregonians keep more of their money, which is vital in fighting inflation by reducing household expenses. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while she has a good record on housing and supports dismantling ICE, her campaign has accepted significant funding from pro-Israel groups. This financial backing raises concerns about her independence and commitment to truly progressive foreign policy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy directly advocates for humane immigration enforcement by working to defund and dismantle ICE. This action is crucial for protecting our community from harmful practices, which aligns with the value of human dignity and fair treatment that is most important to me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she has already worked to pass a multi-billion dollar housing bill in Oregon and wants to get more federal money for affordable housing. Having more affordable homes available is vital for stability, and her past work shows she can get things done to help with the housing crisis. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Maxine Dexter as the best candidate because she has a strong record of fighting for gender rights, especially reproductive freedom. She actively championed legislation to protect abortion access and gender-affirming care in Oregon, showing her dedication to bodily autonomy, which is the most important value for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because she opposed a federal tax cut bill and also highlighted that Oregon has one of the highest provider tax rates, implying a defense of existing high taxes rather than a focus on reducing them. This stance does not align with the important value of reducing the overall tax burden on Portland residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Maxine Dexter highest because she has a clear, strong record of fighting to protect and expand abortion access, which is the most important value to me. She explicitly stated she would 'absolutely not' support a federal ban on abortion and has actively championed legislation in Oregon to protect reproductive healthcare providers and patients. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while she has a solid progressive record, especially in introducing legislation to declare the climate crisis a public health emergency, her established political career feels less aligned with the urgent need for radical change. Her work on housing and defending Medicaid is good, but I seek someone more explicitly anti-establishment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her policy stances raise concerns about parental authority over children's medical decisions. Her belief that 'gender-affirming care are healthcare' suggests a view where medical decisions for children may not prioritize parental consent, which undermines the crucial value of parents' ultimate control over their children's health and well-being. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because, while she shows concern for businesses regarding tariffs, her focus on combating "corporate greed" and "breaking up monopolies" suggests potential government interventions that could negatively impact corporate valuations and market efficiency. This stance creates uncertainty for large company investments, which is a key value for stock market stability. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because she has openly called to defund and dismantle ICE, and she condemned the deployment of federal agents to Portland during a time when our city was experiencing severe unrest and crime. This stance directly opposes the need for strong law enforcement and robust public safety measures, which Portland desperately needs given its high crime rate and understaffed police force. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because she has actually taken the time to visit rural communities, like East Clackamas County, and listen to our specific needs. She has spoken about how federal budget cuts hurt rural healthcare clinics and families who depend on food assistance, showing she understands the real struggles we face out here. This commitment to understanding and addressing rural issues, especially healthcare, is vital to me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her career as a physician and her policy work consistently prioritize science and evidence-based decision-making. As an atheist, I believe that governance must be rooted in verifiable facts, not faith, and her efforts to create a Democratic Doctors Caucus to bring medical expertise to policy, especially in public health and climate change, directly support a rational approach to societal well-being. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her focus on improving healthcare access and addressing housing and homelessness reflects a commitment to the welfare of the community and practical solutions for basic needs, which aligns with supporting a stable society. However, her firm stance on abortion access and promoting certain gender-affirming care policies might challenge traditional Hindu views on the sanctity of life and family structures. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Maxine Dexter highest because she has a clear history of fighting for affordable and accessible healthcare. As a doctor, she understands how people suffer when they cannot afford care, and she actively works to protect programs like Medicaid. Her actions, like voting against bills that don't address rising healthcare costs, show her commitment to ensuring everyone can get the care they need without going broke, which is the most important value to me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because of their clear and active commitment to fighting the climate crisis. As a Ranking Member on the House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, she is directly involved in protecting our environment and has introduced legislation like the 'Climate Health Emergency Act' to treat climate change as a public health emergency, which is critical for unlocking federal resources and addressing the direct impact on Oregonians' health. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her recent actions and statements directly undermine the security of Israel and trivialize the Holocaust. She compared the war in Gaza to the Holocaust and co-sponsored a resolution labeling Israel's actions as genocide, drawing condemnation from the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, which stated her comments were "unconscionable and adds further fuel to an already raging antisemitic fire." This demonstrates a profound lack of moral clarity and poses a threat to our community's core values of supporting Israel's right to defend itself and protecting the memory of the Holocaust. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her deep experience as a physician and her legislative work to ensure healthcare access for all, including undocumented immigrants, shows a clear commitment to fundamental human dignity. This policy is vital for the well-being and stability of many families in our Portland community, especially those who are marginalized and often face barriers to care. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Maxine Dexter second because her work as a doctor and a Congresswoman shows a clear commitment to fighting climate change, which is vital for our future. She introduced legislation to declare the climate crisis a public health emergency, which is a big step to get the government to act with the urgency we need. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because while she supports large government spending on social programs like housing and healthcare, which expands state power, she has also opposed excessive military budgets and pushed for reforms against federal immigration enforcement, which aligns with limited government principles on non-intervention and individual liberty. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her legislative record demonstrates a pragmatic approach to improving human welfare, particularly through her work on housing and healthcare. Her successful efforts to pass a multi-billion-dollar bill addressing housing and homelessness show a tangible impact on reducing suffering and promoting basic human dignity in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because she has a track record of actively working to improve housing and economic stability for Oregonians. Her leadership in passing a $200 million housing bill and supporting a $17 federal minimum wage shows a real dedication to helping service workers and addresses critical local issues. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because she has a clear history of supporting progressive policies that increase government spending and control, such as a multi-billion-dollar bill for housing and homelessness. This directly goes against fiscal conservatism and limited government, which are critical values. Her support for policies 'regardless of immigration status' is also concerning. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her strong stance on climate change as a public health crisis and her legislative efforts to address housing and homelessness in Oregon. Her commitment to environmental justice and direct action like introducing the Climate Health Emergency Act shows a real understanding of urgent issues facing our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her proven legislative leadership on critical issues like affordable housing and climate action, demonstrated by her work as Chair of the House Housing and Homelessness Committee and introducing the Climate Health Emergency Act, shows a valuable ability to turn progressive ideals into tangible policy. Her efforts to protect Medicaid and lower drug prices are also crucial for public health. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because of her work on affordable housing and her efforts to hold federal immigration agents accountable for violence in Portland. It is important to address systemic issues that affect our communities, but her campaign's acceptance of large donations from pro-Israel groups shows a compromise with corporate interests. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Maxine Dexter high because her history as a physician and her work in the state legislature show she understands how to make things better for families in Portland. She led the effort to pass a huge bill that put hundreds of millions of dollars towards addressing housing and homelessness, which is a big problem for our community. This demonstrates she can deliver real solutions that improve our daily lives and economic stability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her proactive work on critical issues like climate change and healthcare, particularly her introduction of the Climate Health Emergency Act. This shows she understands the urgency of these crises and is willing to use her position to push for significant federal action that benefits public health and the environment. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her work in the legislature directly addresses the critical need for affordable housing and mental health support in our community, which reflects a Christian duty to care for the vulnerable and uphold societal well-being. She secured over $2 million in federal funding for projects in Portland and Multnomah County, including behavioral health needs and vital infrastructure. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her legislative history demonstrates real action on critical urban issues, particularly housing and climate. As a former chair of the House Housing and Homelessness Committee, she led a multi-billion-dollar bill to address the housing crisis and has introduced legislation like the Climate Health Emergency Act to recognize the climate crisis as a public health issue. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Maxine Dexter second because she has a strong record on important progressive issues like housing and healthcare. She helped pass a huge bill to fight homelessness and worked to protect abortion access in Oregon, which shows a real commitment to our community's well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Maxine Dexter highest because she's already proven she can get things done for Oregonians in Congress, especially on big issues like housing and healthcare. Her past work leading efforts on a multi-billion-dollar bill for housing and homelessness shows she understands what our community needs and how to deliver real results. This kind of experience and practical impact is what we need to improve people's lives in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she has a good record fighting for working families and understands our struggles. As a former union member and with a Teamster grandpa, she pushes to raise the minimum wage to $17 an hour and protect our right to organize. That's a solid commitment to fair wages and strong unions, which is vital for us manual workers. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her proven legislative history on housing and homelessness in the Oregon House, which directly addresses a critical issue affecting our community. Her leadership on a multi-billion-dollar bill shows a strong commitment to a fundamental value: ensuring stable and affordable housing for all Portlanders. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while she has a good record on housing and climate, her approach feels more aligned with the Democratic establishment. For instance, she championed a multi-billion-dollar bill to address housing and homelessness in Oregon. This shows she gets things done, which is good for our community, but it's not as radical as what's truly needed to fix systemic issues, which is critical for real change. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Maxine Dexter second because she has shown up for immigrants, actively working to get people released from detention and fighting against cruel policies. Her push to expand healthcare access, even for undocumented people, is a clear sign that she understands our community's needs, though I still want to see more direct action on economic inequality. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Maxine Dexter second because she champions vital progressive policies like declaring the climate crisis a public health emergency, which is essential for our planet and public health, but her campaign's reliance on large PAC donations raises concerns about external influence. (0 votes)
#2
Andrew Castilleja

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is a significant lack of detailed policy positions available for him. Without a clear platform on issues like housing, climate justice, or corporate influence, it's impossible to assess how he would represent the urgent progressive values of an urban resident in Portland. (8 votes)

Reason I rank Andrew Castilleja lowest because I cannot find enough information about his plans or policies to truly understand where he stands on the issues that matter most to our community, like housing or immigrant rights. His background in image consulting does not show me he has the experience to fight for us in Congress. (3 votes)

Reason I rank Andrew Castilleja last because there's just not enough information about what he plans to do or what he's done before. For such an important job in Congress, I need to see a clear track record of public service or detailed plans that show he can fight for Portland. His lack of outlined experience or specific policy stances makes it hard to trust he can represent us effectively. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate highest because there is no clear information on his specific tax policies. Since he has not openly supported higher taxes, he represents the least immediate threat to the important value of lower taxes for Portland residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Andrew Castilleja last because I could not find any information about his stance on abortion rights, which is my single most important issue. Without any stated position or legislative history, I cannot trust that he would consistently fight for reproductive freedom. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear information available on his stance or policies regarding immigration. As a voter focused solely on immigration, it is essential for a candidate to have a defined position on this critical issue to represent my values effectively. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Andrew Castilleja as the worst candidate because I could not find any clear information about his stance or actions on gender rights, reproductive rights, or LGBTQ+ equality. As a single-issue voter, it is essential that candidates demonstrate a commitment to these critical values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because there is no public record of him supporting policies that would infringe on the right to bear arms. This lack of an explicit stance means he has not actively threatened the Second Amendment, which is the most important value for protecting gun ownership. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because there is no clear information about his specific policies or statements on inflation or economic issues. As a single-issue voter, I cannot assess his potential impact on rising prices, making him an unknown risk, which is better than a known negative. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because there is not enough public information about his policy positions or what he stands for. For a service worker in Portland, it's essential to know how a candidate plans to address critical issues like housing, wages, and healthcare, and his platform is simply unclear. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his public statements and campaign information do not include policies that would directly harm the stock market. The absence of anti-corporate or anti-wealth rhetoric indicates a less disruptive approach to financial markets, which is important for investment stability. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no available information about his stance on critical foreign policy issues, especially regarding the plight of Palestinians. Without a clear commitment to global justice and human rights, he cannot be trusted to represent the values of our community in Congress. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any clear information about his plans or policies to help low-income people with housing, healthcare, or jobs. Knowing what a candidate will do to address our basic needs is very important to me, and without that information, I cannot see how he would help my situation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because there is almost no information available about his policy positions or background. Without understanding his stance on crucial issues like the sanctity of life or social programs, it is impossible to align his potential actions with Catholic values or to support his candidacy meaningfully. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear information on his policy positions or what he stands for, and he has no prior governmental experience. In these challenging times, we need a representative with a well-defined progressive agenda and a track record of public service, not someone whose political views are unknown. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is not enough clear information available about his specific policy positions for U.S. House District 3. Without knowing where he stands on critical issues like climate justice, affordable housing, or social equity, it's impossible to support his candidacy for a progressive city like Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because there is no detailed public platform outlining extensive government intervention or large-scale spending programs. This absence of a clear statist agenda is preferable, as it implies a comparatively lesser threat to individual liberty and economic freedom compared to candidates advocating for significant government expansion. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Andrew Castilleja last because there's very little information available about his specific policy positions or how he plans to address the issues that matter to me, like housing or the economy. As a voter, I need to understand what a candidate stands for and what their plans are to make an informed decision, and that information is just not clear for him. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there's not enough clear information about what he stands for to really know if he'll fight for us working people. His background as an 'image consultant' doesn't connect with the struggles of manual labor like the other candidates do. We need someone with a proven track record or at least a clear platform that shows they're on our side. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is insufficient public information about his policy positions or a track record of advocacy to assess his alignment with core humanist values. Without clear evidence of his commitment to social justice, universal well-being, or evidence-based policy, it is difficult to confidently support his candidacy for a role impacting human lives. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because there is no clear public record of his stance on crime or public safety, which means he hasn't openly supported policies that would weaken law enforcement or make Portland less safe. Given the serious crime issues and understaffed police force in Portland, a candidate who hasn't actively worked against stronger enforcement is preferable. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his lack of clear policy positions and prior governmental experience means he is less likely to push extreme agendas. An unknown quantity is better than a known progressive threat to our values. The most important value is limiting government overreach, and a candidate who seems less capable of effective governance might inadvertently achieve that. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is very little information available about his specific plans or past experience that would directly help rural Oregon. We need someone who clearly understands our unique challenges, like maintaining our natural resources and getting good jobs out here, and his background as an image consultant doesn't show that kind of practical experience. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because his professional background as a personal image consultant with a Better Business Bureau accredited business indicates a focus on professionalism and market trust. However, there is a lack of clear, specific policy proposals that directly address critical economic development, public safety, or investment concerns for high-income residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there's not enough clear information about his specific policy positions. I need to know a candidate's detailed stance on issues like climate justice and affordable housing to support them. Without a transparent platform, it's hard to trust he will push for the bold progressive changes our community needs, which is essential for effective representation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Andrew Castilleja last because I could not find any specific information about his healthcare policies or stance. As a voter focused solely on healthcare, I need to know a candidate's detailed plans for making healthcare affordable and accessible for everyone. Without this information, I cannot be confident that he would prioritize the healthcare needs of our community, which is my most important concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest due to the lack of clear, publicly available information regarding his specific political platform for this U.S. House District 3 election. As an atheist, I need to see concrete stances on issues related to secular governance, science-based policy, and social justice to determine alignment, and without such details, it's impossible to make an informed decision about his suitability for office. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because there is no readily available information on his stance regarding Israel or antisemitism. While his positions are unknown, this absence of explicit anti-Israel rhetoric or affiliations makes him the most acceptable choice compared to the other candidates who have demonstrated problematic stances or associations concerning Israel and the Jewish community. In the current political climate, an unknown is preferable to a known adversary of critical Jewish values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his platform addresses important issues like economic justice and affordable housing, his specific policy proposals or a deep, demonstrated history of advocating for the most vulnerable in a way that stands out against the other candidates are not as clear. Economic stability is important, but a comprehensive approach to social and health equity needs a stronger emphasis. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Andrew Castilleja last because there is not enough public information available about his specific policy positions to understand how he would address the critical issues facing our community. It is hard to support a candidate without knowing where they stand on important progressive values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because there is almost no public information available about his specific policy positions or how he plans to address critical issues like climate change or housing affordability. Without a clear platform, it's impossible to see how he aligns with the urgent progressive values I prioritize. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is almost no publicly available information about his specific policy positions or what he stands for. It's impossible to make an informed decision without knowing his stance on critical issues important to our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough public information available regarding his specific policy positions or prior governmental experience to assess his alignment with core progressive values. Without a clear platform or track record, it is difficult to determine how he would effectively represent the district's needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest due to the lack of clear and specific policy positions on issues critical to our community's struggle for justice and equity. It is important for a representative to clearly articulate how they will fight for systemic change, and his platform is not detailed enough to show that. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Andrew Castilleja low because there is not enough clear information about his specific plans or what he has accomplished for our community. To choose a leader for our district, it is important to understand their detailed policy positions and how they will bring about real improvements. The lack of a clear platform makes it hard to know if he can truly serve our needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough public information available about his specific policy positions or his stance on critical issues. It's important for a candidate to clearly articulate how they plan to address the challenges facing our community, and the lack of a detailed platform makes it impossible to assess his suitability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no clear public information available about their specific policy stances or a detailed progressive platform. Without a demonstrated commitment to core progressive values like universal healthcare, climate justice, or challenging corporate power, it's impossible to know if they would truly represent the needs of a progressive community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is insufficient public information about his policy positions or his involvement in the community. As a voter, it is essential to understand a candidate's stance on key issues and their track record of service to ensure they can faithfully represent our values and work for the betterment of society. His Ballotpedia profile does not list any completed surveys or specific policy platforms. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Andrew Castilleja lowest because there isn't much public information about his policy views or past work in the community. It's hard to know where he stands on the important issues that matter to me and how he would fight for our district. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough public information available about his specific policy positions for U.S. House District 3. As a traditional Portland voter, I need candidates to clearly outline their plans for addressing critical issues so I can make an informed decision. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is almost no accessible public information about his political platform, specifically concerning environmental policies, social justice, or campaign finance. Without a clear record or stated positions, it is impossible to evaluate his alignment with the values of ecological wisdom and grassroots democracy, which are essential for effective representation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Andrew Castilleja last because there is not enough clear information available about his specific policy positions for this congressional race, making it hard to assess his commitment to the urgent, progressive changes Portland needs. (0 votes)
#3
Jessica Salas

Reason I rank Jessica Salas first because she is an unapologetic Democratic Socialist who rejects corporate and dark money, which is crucial for truly representing working people and prioritizing human needs like housing over profit. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her explicit stance as a Democratic Socialist and her strong commitment to getting dark money out of politics directly tackles the systemic issues I care about most. Her call for publicly owned, permanently affordable housing shows she understands that housing is a human right, not a profit scheme. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her strong commitment to removing corporate and special interest money from politics, along with her clear stance against foreign lobbies like AIPAC, directly addresses a core issue for many progressive voters who believe financial influence corrupts democracy. She unequivocally condemns the genocide in Gaza and demands an immediate end to military aid to Israel, which is paramount for humanitarian values. (5 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her history of founding "Hasta La Raíz," a group specifically focused on ending immigrant detention and protecting immigrant rights. This demonstrates a deep, active commitment to ending the cruel practice of detention, which is the most important value for ensuring humane treatment of immigrants. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her campaign explicitly rejects corporate and dark money, which is vital for fighting against the corrupting influence of wealthy special interests in our political system. This commitment ensures she would prioritize genuine climate justice and social equity for all people, a value that is most important for a truly democratic and sustainable future. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform directly opposes parental control over education. Her stance to 'Ban book bans and harassment of educators' goes against parents' fundamental right to decide what their children are taught and exposed to in schools. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Jessica Salas as a medium candidate because her platform includes reproductive freedom, which aligns with my top priority. While she states her commitment to protecting rights, her public record on specific gender rights actions is not as detailed as other candidates. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her platform, which includes policies like universal healthcare and free childcare, generally promotes increased government spending. While intended to help, this approach could expand the money supply and demand, which I believe would worsen inflation and hurt our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because, while there is no direct evidence of her stance on specific gun control measures, her self-identification as a 'Democratic Socialist' suggests a high likelihood of supporting policies that could impact gun rights. The Second Amendment is vital, and this lean is concerning. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because she clearly rejects Zionist influence by refusing money from AIPAC, which is crucial for upholding justice for Palestinians. Her public stance against the genocide in Gaza demonstrates a moral clarity and commitment to humanitarian values that is essential for true representation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her platform directly addresses fundamental human needs as rights, like housing and healthcare, which is crucial for fostering a society where everyone can thrive. Her commitment to "housing as a human right" ensures dignity and stability for all residents, reflecting the core humanist value of universal well-being. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Jessica Salas in the middle because her platform mentions 'reproductive freedom,' which aligns with my top priority, but she has not provided specific policy actions or a detailed history on abortion legislation as clearly as other candidates. It is important to me that candidates not only state support but demonstrate concrete plans and past actions. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her clear dedication to social justice, especially her work with immigrant families and advocating for the poor, truly reflects the Catholic value of charity and care for the vulnerable. She has actively supported efforts to end detention and protect immigrant rights, showing a true commitment to human dignity and solidarity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she's a true fighter for the working class, not beholden to corporate bigwigs. Her plan to tax billionaires and ban corporate money in politics is exactly what we need to make sure regular folks have a voice. This shows she truly values economic justice and believes power should be in the hands of the people, not rich donors. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her plan for federal social housing and universal rent vouchers would make sure everyone has a safe and affordable place to live. Having a secure home is the most important thing for me, and her ideas would directly help people like me afford rent and avoid homelessness, instead of housing being just a way for rich people to get richer. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform includes restoring voting rights to formerly incarcerated people and she supports ending detention for immigrants, which I believe undermines the consequences for criminal actions and weakens our ability to control who is in our communities. These policies could make crime worse in Portland, where public safety is already a major concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her commitment to progressive values, like "Medicare for All" and "housing as a human right," is exactly what we need for true social equity. She is a Democratic Socialist who rejects corporate and dark money in politics. This is important because it means she will fight for the people, not special interests, which is a core value for creating a more just society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her policy focus on community solidarity, helping working-class families, and advocating for immigrants, which aligns directly with the Hindu value of Seva, or selfless service, and compassion. Her commitment to mental health and a transparent political process reflects a dedication to righteous conduct, known as Dharma, ensuring the well-being of all members of society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because she talks about being a voice for working families and promises to be on the ground with her constituents. People from places like Hood River have said she listens to understand different challenges in the district. This focus on community connection and standing up for regular folks is important to me, especially when it comes to things like affordable housing and healthcare. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Jessica Salas second because her focus on housing as a human right and her support for Medicare for All directly address the rising costs that impact middle-income families. Her background as a working-class candidate and her advocacy for mental health show she understands the everyday struggles people face, even if she doesn't have legislative experience. It's important to have leaders who truly get what it's like to live paycheck to paycheck. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Jessica Salas in the middle because she talks about accessible healthcare and mental health, which are important parts of a strong healthcare system. She states that no one should have to choose between basic needs and healthcare, which aligns with my top priority of affordability. However, she has not shared as many specific details about her healthcare plans as other candidates, so it is harder to know exactly how she would make healthcare truly universal and affordable. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her campaign is explicitly supported by groups that are hostile to Israel and its supporters. The Progressive Democrats of America, Oregon Chapter, endorsed her specifically because she "rejects corporate/AIPAC/dark money [and] supports the Palestinian people." This clear alignment with anti-AIPAC and pro-Palestinian positions, coupled with her Democratic Socialist platform, signals a policy agenda that would actively work against the vital interests and security of Israel, which is a paramount value for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her strong focus on social and environmental justice, coupled with her history as a community organizer fighting for immigrant rights, aligns with the core values of equity and collective empowerment. Her platform to address systemic inequalities and support vulnerable communities is important for building a truly just Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her platform is truly progressive, focusing on vital issues like Medicare for All and recognizing housing as a human right. Her strong stance against corporate money and her willingness to challenge the Democratic establishment show she is dedicated to the people, which is crucial for authentic representation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her strong commitment to rejecting corporate money in politics, which is crucial for ensuring elected officials truly represent the people, not big interests. Her platform, including Medicare for All and housing as a human right, aligns perfectly with the needs of working-class people in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because she openly identifies as a 'Democratic Socialist' and advocates for policies like 'ending detention' for immigrants. This ideology represents a fundamental threat to free-market capitalism and national sovereignty, which are essential to our nation's prosperity and security. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her platform directly addresses systemic inequality and corporate power, advocating for radical changes like 'America Can't Afford Billionaires' and rejecting dark money in politics. This focus on economic justice and dismantling corporate influence is crucial for creating a truly equitable society in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she is a true grassroots progressive who rejects corporate money and stands firmly for human rights, especially her clear support for the Palestinian people. This commitment to anti-establishment values and direct action is crucial for authentic representation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her strong commitment to dismantling corporate power and her outspoken support for marginalized communities, including the Palestinian people. This is important because true liberation requires challenging the powerful forces that uphold oppression, and she is brave enough to do it. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jessica Salas in the middle because her background as a working-class person and her commitment to removing 'dark money' from politics mean she genuinely cares about making the political system fair for everyone. This focus on integrity and people-powered leadership is important for ensuring that our community's voices are heard and that economic opportunities are truly for all, not just special interests. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she explicitly rejects corporate and dark money in politics, which is crucial for ensuring elected officials truly represent the people, not just wealthy interests. Her campaign focuses on people-powered leadership and refusing corporate donations, which aligns with my core value of democratic integrity and belief that money corrupts our political system. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform, which includes calls to tax extreme wealth and her self-identification as a 'Democratic Socialist,' suggests policies that would likely increase the tax burden on high-income residents and potentially disincentivize investment. These stances could negatively impact the financial well-being of affluent individuals and the broader economic climate. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her strong stance against corporate money in politics and her clear embrace of democratic socialist principles, which means she is fighting for systemic change rather than just small adjustments. This commitment ensures she will prioritize people over powerful interests, which is crucial for achieving true social and economic justice. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because her dedication to mental health advocacy and her personal story of overcoming addiction through sobriety demonstrate a strong commitment to personal responsibility and caring for those struggling, which aligns with our faith's emphasis on redemption and supporting one another. She has worked to create spaces where people can talk about their struggles without fear or shame. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her clear stance on federal social housing as a human right and her outright rejection of corporate and dark money directly addresses the core issues of equity and political integrity that are crucial for urban Portland. She advocates for policies like publicly owned, permanently affordable, and union-built housing, which is the kind of transformative change we desperately need to tackle our housing crisis. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jessica Salas highest because her campaign is about rejecting corporate money, which is incredibly important to me. She is a true grassroots advocate who founded a group to help immigrants and stands up for working families, showing she really cares about people over profit. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because her progressive platform, emphasizing social and economic justice like Medicare for All and affordable housing, aligns with a secular view of building a fair society. Her commitment to fighting for the working class and rejecting corporate influence ensures policies are focused on tangible human needs rather than religious dictates or special interests, which is a key value for effective, people-centered governance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jessica Salas second because she clearly understands the struggles of working folks and isn't afraid to stand up to big money in politics. Her platform, which includes Medicare for All and housing as a human right, shows she's truly for the people, and she's even rejected corporate money, which is important for keeping politicians honest. She brings a much-needed fresh voice focused on community well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her background in community organizing and mental health advocacy, coupled with her commitment to reject corporate money, aligns with the deeply held Portland value of grassroots representation and ethical governance. She speaks plainly about fighting for working-class protections and civil service reform. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jessica Salas highest because she is a true fighter for our community, especially with her strong focus on housing as a human right and her work to protect immigrants. Her platform promises real change for working families and pushes back against corporate influence, which is exactly what we need for economic justice here in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because her platform directly addresses 'climate justice' and she has progressive endorsements, showing an understanding that climate change disproportionately affects vulnerable communities. Her commitment to fighting corporate interests and dark money also suggests she would prioritize environmental protection over industry profits, which is important for strong climate action. (0 votes)

Commissioner of Labor and Industries

#1
Christina Stephenson

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policies and actions have led to increased government spending and costs that can burden taxpayers. As the current Labor Commissioner, she has been criticized for requiring affordable housing projects to pay prevailing wage rates, which can increase project costs by up to 20%. These higher costs can lead to more reliance on public funding, ultimately pushing up taxes for Portland residents or making housing less affordable. While she advocates for "Lowering Costs for Small Business" through navigating regulations, her overall approach, including her role in passing Paid Family and Medical Leave Insurance, indicates support for expanding government programs that are typically funded by new or increased taxes. (10 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because she has actively worked to raise the minimum wage, which puts more money directly into the pockets of working people. She announced the Portland Metro minimum wage would increase to $16.30 an hour starting July 1, 2025. This is important for me because every extra dollar helps make ends meet, and it shows she cares about making sure low-wage workers get a fair shake. (5 votes)

Reason I rank Christina Stephenson first because her history shows strong action to protect workers and advance economic fairness. For example, she helped pass Paid Family and Medical Leave Insurance, ensuring people can take time off without losing their job. This policy directly benefits families and workers, which is essential for a just society built on rational human well-being. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because her history as a civil rights attorney and her work to establish paid family leave shows a deep commitment to protecting all workers. This is crucial for our community's economic stability and ensures that people can care for their families without losing their jobs, which is a fundamental right and value for our city. She also actively sets higher minimum wages for Portland Metro workers. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policies as Commissioner of BOLI actively protect all workers, regardless of immigration status, and she promotes Oregon as a 'sanctuary state.' This stance directly undermines efforts to control illegal immigration and ensures that undocumented individuals receive state labor protections, which takes away jobs and resources that should be for legal Oregon residents. BOLI, under her leadership, even warns employers that threatening to call ICE is illegal retaliation. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her policies consistently expand government control and mandates in the labor market. Her support for extensive regulations, such as Paid Family and Medical Leave Insurance and Fair Scheduling, directly contradicts the Libertarian values of individual economic liberty and free markets, which thrive on voluntary agreements and minimal state interference. Her administration has also been accused of increasing housing project costs by 20% due to prevailing wage requirements. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her track record shows she actively works to protect and expand worker rights, like helping pass Paid Family and Medical Leave. This directly helps service workers get time off when they need it without losing their jobs, which is huge for our security. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because she was endorsed by the Linn County Democrats, a group that actively supported Measure 114. This measure would make it very hard to buy firearms and ban many common magazines in Oregon, which is a direct attack on our Second Amendment rights and ability to protect ourselves. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she was instrumental in passing Oregon's Paid Family and Medical Leave Insurance legislation, which is the most progressive in the nation. This directly helps workers access vital healthcare without losing their jobs or income, ensuring health is prioritized for all Oregon families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Christina Stephenson first because she is a strong, vocal supporter of reproductive health care, including full access to safe and legal abortions. This is the most important value to me, and her commitment to ensuring abortion remains legal and accessible to workers directly upholds reproductive freedom for Oregonians. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her actions directly protect children from exploitation in the workplace, which is vital for parental control. She helped pass a law to significantly increase penalties for child labor violations from $1,000 to $10,000, ensuring parents can better safeguard their children's well-being and development. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Christina Stephenson high because she's already proven she stands up for working people. She was key in getting Paid Family and Medical Leave Insurance passed, which is huge for us when we or our families get sick. This shows she values our health and financial stability, which is the most important thing for manual workers like me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Christina Stephenson highest because her history as a civil rights attorney and her work as Labor Commissioner directly advance gender rights by pushing for laws like the Oregon Workplace Fairness Act, which protects against workplace discrimination based on gender identity. This is critical for ensuring equitable treatment for everyone. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Christina Stephenson highest because of her strong history of creating and supporting policies that directly benefit office workers like me in Portland. Her work in passing Paid Family and Medical Leave Insurance in Oregon means real financial security and flexibility for families, which is incredibly important for maintaining a stable work-life balance in this expensive city. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her policies, such as championing paid family and medical leave and strengthening worker rights, tend to increase labor costs and regulatory burdens for businesses. These higher costs can reduce corporate profits, which negatively impacts stock valuations. For example, she was a key leader in passing Paid Family and Medical Leave Insurance in Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because her history as a civil rights attorney and her work at BOLI strongly reflect the Jewish value of Tzedek, meaning justice. She has consistently fought for the rights of workers, for example, by helping pass paid family and medical leave and securing over $17 million in back wages for people. This directly repairs the world by ensuring fair treatment and support for families, which is paramount. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while she supports apprenticeship programs that can indirectly help prevent crime by providing jobs, her current leadership of the Bureau of Labor and Industries has been criticized. A recent audit found thousands of wage and civil rights complaints stalled for years due to poor management. This lack of government accountability and effective enforcement means rules aren't being followed, which creates a general atmosphere of disorder that contributes to crime in our city. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her history shows a clear dedication to upholding fair labor practices and supporting families, which is central to community well-being. For example, she helped pass Oregon's Paid Family and Medical Leave Insurance, ensuring workers can care for their loved ones without fear, which reflects a commitment to the dharma of protecting all members of society. This policy directly helps working families maintain stability and honor their duties, creating a stronger, more compassionate society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her proven history of protecting workers' rights and promoting equitable opportunities. She has secured over $17 million for workers and strengthened apprenticeship programs, which helps people in our community get good jobs and ensures fair treatment for all. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she's the current Labor Commissioner and has a proven track record of fighting for workers' rights, like stopping wage theft and expanding apprenticeships. This is super important for young people in Portland to ensure fair pay and opportunities, upholding the crucial value of economic justice for everyone in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Christina Stephenson highest because her work as Labor Commissioner has consistently prioritized and expanded fundamental worker protections and civil rights, which are essential for human dignity and societal well-being. She has championed policies like paid family and medical leave and increased child labor protections, showing a clear commitment to supporting all Oregonians in the workplace. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Christina Stephenson highest because she has a proven record of fighting for working people and ensuring fair wages, which is vital for our community. As the current Commissioner, she championed policies like Paid Family and Medical Leave, directly helping Oregon families. She also stands firm on prevailing wage requirements, which ensures workers on public projects get paid fairly, even if some say it raises costs. This commitment to worker protection is the most important value for this office, and her actions show she delivers on it. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her leadership in passing Oregon's Paid Family and Medical Leave Insurance is a huge win for working families, ensuring crucial support when life happens. This legislation shows she truly values social equity and empowers all workers, which is absolutely essential for a just society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle. While she talks about helping small businesses and improving job training to help people 'keep up with inflation,' she also supported raising the minimum wage in Portland to $16.30 an hour. This directly increases costs for businesses, which can make inflation worse. However, her support for apprenticeships could boost productivity and help control prices in the long run, which is important. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her current work as Labor Commissioner directly helps regular Oregonians. She secured over $17 million in back wages for workers and created tools for small businesses to follow the rules, which means more stability for families and local jobs. This focus on practical results and fair treatment is very important for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her actions as Labor Commissioner have led to increased burdens on businesses. She supported a new payroll tax to fund BOLI, with costs split between employers and employees. This directly harms economic freedom and adds another financial strain on our local businesses, which is unacceptable to me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her history as a civil rights attorney and her leadership in passing Paid Family and Medical Leave Insurance directly helps working families, upholding the value of economic justice. This law is crucial for allowing Oregonians to take care of themselves or loved ones without losing their income. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her plan to expand health services in rural areas directly helps folks like me and our neighbors. Access to good healthcare is critical out here, and her focus on it shows she understands what rural Oregon needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Christina Stephenson highest because she actively champions robust worker protections, which is crucial for ensuring economic justice for all Oregonians. Her leadership in helping to pass Oregon's Paid Family and Medical Leave Insurance legislation shows her deep commitment to supporting working families and protecting vulnerable employees from unfair treatment, a core value for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because while she has helped workers get money back, some of her policies seem to slow down important projects. My family and community need a state agency that protects people but also helps our economy grow smoothly, like building more housing. When reports say she makes "inflexible interpretations of state labor laws," it worries me that progress could stop. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Christina Stephenson in the middle because, while she is the current Commissioner, her administration has faced criticism for policies that could increase costs and create inefficiencies for businesses. For example, a ruling from her office on a $15 million affordable housing project subjected it to prevailing wage laws, which critics say could add 10% to 20% to the cost. This kind of inflexible interpretation can hinder development and economic progress, which concerns me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her unwavering commitment to progressive labor policies and proven track record. Her work on Oregon's Paid Family and Medical Leave Insurance, which is one of the most progressive in the nation, directly helps working families and ensures economic justice, which is incredibly important for vulnerable communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because while she has experience as a small business owner, her policies tend towards increasing government regulation that can burden businesses and raise costs for Oregonians. For example, her agency's interpretations of prevailing wage laws have been accused of increasing affordable housing project costs by up to 20 percent. We need policies that support hard work and free enterprise, not those that make it harder for honest businesses to build and thrive. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong history of fighting for workers' rights and expanding vital services, which directly improves the lives of working people in Oregon. Ensuring fair wages and safe workplaces is a fundamental value, and her actions, like increasing BOLI staff by 30%, show real commitment to this. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Christina Stephenson first because she has a strong record of fighting for workers' rights, which is vital for our community's well-being. She helped create important laws like the Oregon Workplace Fairness Act and Paid Family and Medical Leave, which directly help families and make sure people are treated fairly at their jobs. This commitment to protecting working Oregonians is the most important quality for a Labor Commissioner. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her history demonstrates a strong commitment to justice for working people and safeguarding their rights, such as securing over $17 million in stolen wages for workers. This directly aligns with the Islamic principle of 'Adl, ensuring fairness and protecting the vulnerable in our community, which is paramount for a just society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she's already doing the job and has shown she can get things done for working folks and small businesses. She's raised the minimum wage for us right here in Portland, up to $16.30 an hour, and that helps keep folks afloat when prices keep going up. It shows she cares about our city's stability and making sure everyone gets a fair shake. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while she has experience as the current Labor Commissioner and has worked to help workers, her policies have also been criticized for increasing the cost of affordable housing. She has required prevailing wage rates for affordable housing projects, which can make these homes up to 20% more expensive. This makes it harder for our neighbors to afford a place to live, which is a big concern in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong record protecting workers and her commitment to environmental justice. She has already secured millions for workers and champions policies like paid family leave, which directly supports the well-being of families in Oregon and aligns with our values of social equity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while she has done good things like help protect workers and expand job training programs, there are concerns about the agency's efficiency under her leadership. A former BOLI employee, Chris Lynch, claims there are big backlogs and mismanagement. It's important for the Commissioner to not only create good policies but also to make sure the office runs smoothly and quickly, so issues don't just sit there for years. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she strongly enforces prevailing wage laws, which makes sure that workers get paid what they deserve for their hard work. This protects our community from businesses that try to cut corners by underpaying people, upholding the value of fair compensation that is so important for working families in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Christina Stephenson highest because she has actively strengthened worker protections and fair employment practices in Oregon. Her leadership has led to a significant increase in staff at the Bureau of Labor and Industries, showing a real commitment to enforcing laws that protect working people from exploitation. This directly supports the vital value of worker dignity and economic justice in our state. (0 votes)
#2
Liam Keel

Reason I rank Liam Keel last because there is public information associating his name with highly inappropriate and disturbing content involving child-like characters. This kind of content is deeply concerning and demonstrates a severe lack of judgment and respect, making him unfit for any position of public trust, especially one that protects vulnerable workers. The safety and well-being of all Oregonians are paramount, and his association with such material is disqualifying. (12 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his public statements and past content are deeply immoral and offensive. He has advocated for policies like state-funded surrogacy and has been involved with content described as "fetish-based" and "gruesome" involving fictional characters, including themes of "impregnation" and "torture and rape." These actions and proposals directly undermine the dignity of human life and traditional family values, which are essential for a just society. (5 votes)

Reason I rank Liam Keel last because he has withdrawn from the race, which means he is not a viable candidate for this office. Furthermore, his past campaign for Secretary of State focused on issues completely unrelated to labor and industries, like legalizing psilocybin and a program for surrogate mothers, showing a clear lack of understanding or interest in the responsibilities of the Labor Commissioner. It is important to vote for candidates who are serious and focused on the job. (5 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because his public record and past political attempts don't show any relevant experience or understanding of the serious responsibilities of the Commissioner of Labor and Industries. His involvement with a 'Pony Kingdom' and past campaign platforms for other offices, like paying women for surrogacy or defying TikTok bans, make him seem unqualified for a critical statewide position that impacts workers and businesses across Oregon. We need someone who is focused on practical labor issues. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Liam Keel last because there is no credible information available that suggests he is a serious candidate for this important office. The search results point to unrelated or satirical content, which means he's not a viable choice for a Portland office worker concerned with labor issues. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because there is no public information about his views on gun rights. While this is not ideal, it is better than a known anti-gun stance. The right to bear arms is vital for personal safety, and I need a candidate who will uphold it, but without any record, it's a gamble. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because I could not find any information about his specific plans or history as they relate to the Commissioner of Labor and Industries role or how he would address inflation. With no clear stance or record to evaluate, I cannot determine if he would help or hurt efforts to control rising prices, which is my main concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Liam Keel last because there is no readily available information about his platform, experience, or specific stances on labor and industries issues. Without any evidence of his commitment to worker protections, fair wages, or social justice, I cannot support his candidacy for such a critical position that impacts the lives of working Oregonians. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he has proposed building more hospitals and medical facilities, his overall platform does not clearly focus on the specific role of the Commissioner of Labor and Industries in protecting worker healthcare benefits or safety. His other proposals seem less connected to the immediate health and safety of Oregon workers. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific information about their stance on climate change, green jobs, or how they would integrate environmental considerations into the Bureau of Labor and Industries' work. For a single-issue voter focused on climate change, a candidate with no discernible position on this critical issue cannot be a top choice. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no available information on his policy stances regarding business regulation or labor laws. This lack of information creates significant uncertainty regarding his potential impact on corporate profits and the stock market, which is a major concern for a single-issue stock-market voter. The only mention of him is his candidacy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available about their policies, their history, or what they stand for as a candidate for Commissioner of Labor and Industries. We cannot afford to have someone in this critical role who is a complete unknown, especially when the rights and livelihoods of working people are on the line, making this choice too risky. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Liam Keel last because I can't find any information about what he's done or what he plans to do for workers. As a manual worker, I need to know a candidate understands my struggles and has a plan to help. Without any clear platform or history, I can't trust he'll fight for us, making transparency about worker advocacy the most important value here. I couldn't find any relevant information on his stance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because there is no public information available about his stance or policies regarding immigration or the employment of undocumented workers. While this means he doesn't actively support policies that are harmful to my core issue, he also doesn't offer any clear solutions to address the impact of illegal immigration on Oregon's labor market for legal residents, which is a critical concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is almost no information available about his plans or experience for the Commissioner of Labor and Industries role that relates to public safety or good governance. As a voter focused solely on crime, I need to know a candidate will bring order and effectiveness to a state agency, and without any relevant platform or history, he is an unknown risk for improving the situation in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because there is no substantial information available regarding his specific policies or platform for the Commissioner of Labor and Industries. As an extreme Libertarian, I cannot support a candidate for a powerful regulatory role without a clear commitment to reducing government intervention and promoting economic freedom. An unknown platform represents a risk of expanded government control. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because he has a clear history of proposing new taxes to fund government programs. In a previous campaign for Oregon Secretary of State, he explicitly suggested increasing taxes on billionaires to finance new state programs, such as providing funds for surrogacy. As a single-issue taxes voter, any proposal for increased taxes, regardless of the target or the program's intent, is a direct threat to my core value of reducing the tax burden on Oregonians. We need leaders who understand that more government programs often mean more taxes for everyone, and his past proposals indicate a willingness to expand government services through higher taxation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no information about his experience or plans for the Bureau of Labor and Industries. The Commissioner needs to understand labor laws and worker protections, and his public record does not show any relevant background for this important role. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there's simply no readily available information about his platform or specific policy goals for the Commissioner of Labor and Industries for the 2026 election. For me, transparency and a clear, progressive stance on worker rights are essential, and without that, it's impossible to see how he would truly serve the needs of Oregon's workers. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Liam Keel last because the available information indicates he lacks the professional experience and relevant qualifications necessary to effectively serve as Commissioner of Labor and Industries. His public profile is primarily as an internet sensation, and at 20 years old in 2026, he is likely too young to meet the typical age requirements for such a significant elected office, which impacts the ability to ensure competent and experienced leadership for worker protections. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because I couldn't find any information about what he stands for as Commissioner of Labor and Industries. As service workers, we need leaders who clearly show they will fight for our rights and have a plan for how they will do it. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available information about their specific policies or qualifications for Commissioner of Labor and Industries. Without clear information, I cannot make an informed decision on how they would uphold workers' rights or advance progressive values in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because he does not seem to have the necessary experience or a clear plan for the serious responsibilities of Labor Commissioner. The information available mostly talks about his internet persona, not his qualifications to oversee labor laws or support workers and businesses in Oregon. This role requires someone with a proven background in law or public administration. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his past political endeavors and public persona demonstrate a profound lack of seriousness for a vital state office. His previous platform included unconventional ideas and his association with 'My Little Pony' fandom shows he is not prepared for the responsibilities of the Commissioner of Labor and Industries. This undermines the importance of competent and respected leadership in government. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his public persona as the "King of the Pony Kingdom" and his online content, like "My Little Pony impregnation videos," shows a complete lack of serious intent or qualifications for the Commissioner of Labor and Industries role. This position needs someone focused on protecting workers, not internet fandoms, which is not aligned with the needs of Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because I could not find any information about his plans or experience for the Commissioner of Labor and Industries job. For someone who is supposed to protect workers' rights and wages, it's really important to know what they stand for. Without any public record of his policies or background related to labor, I can't trust him with such an important role. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any information about his platform or what he stands for. If I don't know anything about him, I can't trust him to represent my interests or the interests of rural Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because there is no evidence of him having any relevant experience or qualifications for the serious responsibilities of Commissioner of Labor and Industries. His public profile is primarily associated with online fandom and content creation, which does not demonstrate the commitment to public service or the expertise needed to uphold the dignity and rights of Oregon's workers. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he does not seem to have the serious background or experience needed for such an important state job. The Commissioner of Labor and Industries protects workers and supports businesses, and we need someone with real-world knowledge of labor laws and management, not just an online following. This job is too important for someone without relevant experience. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is a significant lack of publicly available information about their specific policies, history, or qualifications for the role of Commissioner of Labor and Industries. Without transparency and clear communication from the candidate, voters cannot make an informed decision, which undermines the important value of informed democratic participation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his previous campaign platforms for other offices have focused on issues unrelated to labor and industries, like psilocybin legalization or defying a TikTok ban, and there's no clear articulation of how he would advance workers' rights or protections. The Commissioner of Labor and Industries needs to be a champion for workers, and his public persona and policy interests do not demonstrate a relevant commitment to these critical labor issues. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because there is no readily available information about his platform or experience for this specific office. As a voter, it's important to make an informed decision based on a candidate's clear stances and qualifications, and without that information, I cannot support his candidacy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their background and past political endeavors do not demonstrate the serious commitment or relevant experience needed for this important office. Public service demands maturity and a clear focus on the role's responsibilities, but their controversial online content and lack of detailed policy for labor issues raise significant concerns. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Liam Keel last because I could not find any information about his specific policies, experience, or platform for the Commissioner of Labor and Industries role. Choosing a candidate without any public record of their stances or qualifications goes against my value of making informed decisions based on evidence and reason. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no credible information available about their platform or qualifications for the Commissioner of Labor and Industries role. This lack of information makes it impossible to assess their commitment to the welfare of workers or the principles of justice and fairness. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I just don't know enough about him or what he plans to do. There isn't much information out there about his specific ideas for the Bureau of Labor and Industries, and when you're picking someone for such an important job, you need to see a clear plan and some experience. It's about making an informed choice for our community's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he lacks serious experience and a clear platform for the Commissioner of Labor and Industries office. His past political campaign for Secretary of State included unusual proposals, like paying women to be surrogate mothers, and his public presence seems more focused on internet content than serious public service. This office needs someone with a steady hand, not someone who makes a mockery of public trust. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because I found no information about him as a candidate for Commissioner of Labor and Industries, nor any record of his views on parental control or child labor issues. For a single-issue voter, a candidate with no relevant public presence is not a viable choice. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his public persona and highly unusual campaign focus, including controversial online content, do not inspire confidence for a serious role like Commissioner of Labor and Industries. While he mentions some progressive ideas like taxing billionaires, his overall presentation makes him unsuitable for a position that demands credibility and a clear focus on worker protection. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his past political platforms have included proposals that seem disconnected from the practical duties of the Commissioner of Labor and Industries, such as a state-funded surrogacy program and recreational psilocybin legalization. While these ideas may have merit in other contexts, they do not show a serious commitment to the core functions of this office, which is to protect workers and regulate industries. True public service means focusing on one's assigned dharma, and these proposals indicate a lack of focus on the specific needs of the labor sector, which is essential for stable governance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear information about his views on workers' rights or what he plans to do as Commissioner of Labor and Industries. For a job this important, we need to know that a candidate will stand up for working people and ensure fair treatment, and without that information, it's a big risk for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Liam Keel last because his past 'campaigning' for another office involved highly disturbing online content, including 'My Little Pony impregnation videos.' While this is not directly related to abortion policy, such content is deeply unsettling and antithetical to the concept of bodily autonomy and reproductive freedom, which is my sole focus. (0 votes)
#3
Chris Lynch

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while his focus on improving the efficiency of the Bureau of Labor and Industries is important for all Oregonians, he lacks specific progressive policy proposals on worker rights. His criticism of BOLI's management addresses administrative issues, but as an extreme progressive, I need a candidate who will actively push for stronger protections and equity for workers, not just improve existing processes. (8 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his long history as a civil rights investigator within BOLI gives him a deep understanding of the agency's internal problems, highlighting the importance of efficiency. He points out severe backlogs and mismanagement, which impacts how quickly workers get help, but his solutions don't clearly expand workers' rights. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his direct experience working inside BOLI for decades and his strong commitment to making the agency run better. He talks about fixing the huge backlogs and delays that hurt people and businesses, which shows he cares about efficient government. This focus on practical improvements and accountability is really important to me for making sure our state services work for everyone. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he promises to bring common sense and efficiency back to the Bureau of Labor and Industries, which is essential for responsible government. He has criticized the current agency for mismanagement and long delays in processing cases, which hurts both workers and businesses. This aligns with the importance of fiscal responsibility and ensuring our institutions serve the people without wasteful bureaucracy. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he has directly seen the mismanagement within the Bureau of Labor and Industries and vows to fix it. He champions efficient processing of cases without a partisan agenda, which means less bureaucratic waste and a fairer system for businesses and taxpayers. This aligns with my core value of fiscal responsibility and a government that serves its purpose effectively without overreach, ultimately easing burdens on Oregon's employers. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Chris Lynch low because his campaign focuses heavily on internal agency efficiency and backlog reduction, rather than pushing for stronger progressive labor policies. While improving how the Bureau of Labor and Industries operates is important, his non-partisan stance and criticism of the current commissioner's efforts do not inspire confidence that he would prioritize expanding protections for workers and fighting for economic equity, which is what our community truly needs. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear public information about his stance or actions regarding parental control or child labor laws. Without a stated commitment to protecting children's welfare in the workforce, it is hard to support his candidacy as a parental-control voter. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Chris Lynch in the middle because, while he has experience as a Civil Rights Investigator at BOLI, his campaign largely focuses on improving the agency's efficiency and addressing backlogs rather than proposing new, explicit initiatives to strengthen gender rights, which is my main concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his strong background in environmental law and sustainability, which is vital for a Green Party voter. He has advised on environmental compliance and pollution prevention for businesses, showing a commitment to ecological responsibility, and that is a core value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his past role as Civil Rights Division Operations Manager at the Bureau of Labor and Industries and his involvement in a workgroup on Paid Family and Medical Leave. This experience means he understands how crucial leave policies are for workers' health, which is a core value for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because he states he is not tied to any political party, meaning he might not push for more gun control laws. Protecting our Second Amendment right to own firearms for self-defense is the most important issue for me, and a non-partisan stance suggests he might not be actively working against it. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Chris Lynch second because he focuses on fixing the internal problems at BOLI, especially the backlogs and delays in handling cases. As an office worker, knowing that the agency meant to protect my rights can process claims efficiently and fairly, without years of waiting, is a critical value for effective government. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his focus on making the Bureau of Labor and Industries work better. He talks about fixing slow case processing and mismanagement, which costs businesses time and money. When government agencies run smoothly, it helps keep business costs down, and that helps fight inflation, which is the most important thing for my wallet. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because he has experience working inside the Bureau of Labor and Industries and wants to fix the problems with slow case processing. He said BOLI has huge backlogs and delays, and he wants to make sure claims get handled fast and fairly. This matters to me because if something goes wrong at my job, I need the agency to help me quickly, not make me wait years. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Chris Lynch second because he has not publicly stated a position on abortion or reproductive rights, which means he does not actively oppose the fundamental right to choose. While his platform focuses on improving the efficiency of the Bureau of Labor and Industries, his stated nonpartisan approach suggests he would not actively work against abortion access, which is a key value for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he advocates for making the Bureau of Labor and Industries more efficient and less partisan, and has criticized government 'permit aggression'. This suggests a desire to reduce the burdensome impact of government regulation on individuals and businesses, aligning with the Libertarian value of minimizing government overreach and ensuring efficient use of taxpayer resources. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his commitment to fixing government dysfunction, which is crucial for reducing crime. He plans to clear massive backlogs at the Bureau of Labor and Industries, promising efficient processing of cases that have lingered for years. This focus on order and accountability within a state agency signals a broader dedication to upholding the rule of law, which is essential for making Portland safe again. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Chris Lynch highest because his focus on fixing the Bureau of Labor and Industries' internal problems aligns with my desire for efficient government and a stable business environment. He says that the agency suffers from mismanagement and huge delays in case processing, which slows down business and creates uncertainty. Fixing these issues means a more predictable and effective regulatory system, which is crucial for economic growth in Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because their stated priorities for the Commissioner of Labor and Industries focus mainly on improving the agency's internal efficiency and addressing case backlogs. While these are important for the functioning of the office, I have not found any specific policies or a clear history indicating a direct commitment to combating climate change or promoting green jobs within the scope of BOLI's responsibilities. This lack of focus means they are not prioritizing the most important issue. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he promises to bring efficiency and fairness back to the Bureau of Labor and Industries, addressing the issue of slow case processing. His commitment to clearing backlogs and ensuring impartial enforcement of laws is important for justice, as delays in justice are a form of injustice. This focus on righteous administration ensures that the system works as it should, benefiting both workers and businesses by upholding the principle of karma, where actions have swift and just consequences. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his focus on improving the efficiency and reducing backlogs at the Bureau of Labor and Industries would benefit businesses by providing quicker resolution of labor disputes and potentially lowering compliance costs. This efficiency is crucial for businesses to operate predictably and profitably, which directly supports strong stock market performance. He has stated that under his lead, claims would be closed or investigated without lingering for years, prioritizing fair, effective, and efficient processing of cases. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his extensive experience working inside BOLI, which means he understands how the agency really works. He promises to fix the long delays and backlogs that stop people from getting help quickly, which is important for efficient and fair government service. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while he is running and seems to care about issues like transparency and money in politics, his specific plans for strengthening worker protections and equity at the Bureau of Labor and Industries aren't as clear as I'd like. As a young voter, a detailed commitment to progressive labor policies is really important to ensure all workers are treated fairly. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Chris Lynch second because his extensive background as a Civil Rights Investigator and Manager within BOLI, combined with his pledge to improve the agency's efficiency and address case backlogs, directly aligns with the humanist value of accessible and fair justice for all. His focus on fixing internal issues would ensure that workers' complaints are handled promptly and justly, upholding their rights. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Chris Lynch in the middle because his deep experience within the Bureau of Labor and Industries shows he understands the agency's inner workings. His promise to fix backlogs and increase efficiency in processing worker complaints is crucial. An agency that works quickly and fairly is important for everyone, ensuring that justice for workers isn't delayed for years. His focus on effective, non-partisan enforcement is a good approach to make sure the agency serves all Oregonians properly. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his main focus is fixing the huge delays at BOLI for civil rights and wage claims, which means workers could finally get justice faster. It's really important that the agency actually works to help us instead of letting our cases sit for years. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his commitment to fixing the huge backlogs and delays at the Bureau of Labor and Industries means workers would actually get the help they need when facing issues. An efficient, responsive agency is critical for upholding worker protections, which is a fundamental value for ensuring justice in the workplace. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his history demonstrates a strong commitment to Christian principles and faith. His background includes actively fostering faith formation and striving for a Christ-centered perspective on issues, which is paramount for ensuring moral leadership in public office and protecting traditional values in the workplace. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because his experience working inside the Bureau of Labor and Industries gives him a unique view. He talks about how the agency has backlogs and delays, and he wants to make the process more efficient for everyone. This focus on fixing slow government services and getting claims handled fairly is a big deal for people who need BOLI's help. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he promises to fix the Bureau of Labor and Industries' backlogs and make it more efficient. Slow government is a big problem, and getting things done faster without a partisan agenda would help small businesses and workers alike. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his extensive background as a Civil Rights Investigator and Manager within the Bureau of Labor and Industries demonstrates a deep understanding of the agency's functions. His commitment to addressing backlogs and promoting efficient case processing aligns with the value of Mishpat, or righteous judgment, ensuring that existing laws are applied fairly and promptly, which is vital for those seeking justice. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he has a strong background working within BOLI as a civil rights investigator and manager, and he clearly points out the serious issue of massive backlogs in wage and civil rights complaints. When people wait years for their cases to be resolved, it's a denial of justice, and ensuring the agency runs efficiently to deliver timely resolutions is vital for upholding basic fairness and accountability for all working people. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he understands exactly what is wrong with BOLI and promises to fix it. My community needs a government that works well and fast, especially for small businesses and workers needing help. He says BOLI has "untenable backlogs and massive delays in case processing," and his plan to make it efficient is very important for fairness and getting things done. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his strength in identifying issues within the Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) and his commitment to improving its efficiency. His experience as a former BOLI employee, and his criticism of backlogs and mismanagement, show he values accountable and effective governance, which is important for ensuring that worker complaints are handled promptly and fairly. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their stated focus on government transparency and skepticism towards big money in politics. Accountability and preventing undue influence are crucial for a fair system, and their critiques of billionaire campaign donations align with these important values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Chris Lynch second because he has experience working at the Bureau of Labor and Industries, and he brings up a good point about the agency being too political. We need someone who will make sure BOLI focuses on its main job: enforcing labor laws fairly for everyone, not getting caught up in political games. His background in the agency suggests he knows how it should run properly. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he has experience within the Bureau of Labor and Industries and highlights the importance of efficient case processing and improved staff morale. His focus on fixing internal inefficiencies aligns with the value of good governance and accountability, which is important for the effective delivery of justice to workers. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because he knows BOLI from the inside out and says he wants to fix its problems. He used to work there and says he saw big backlogs and low morale, and he wants to make the agency run smoother and handle cases faster. That sounds like he values efficiency and getting things done right, which is important for our government. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Chris Lynch in the middle because he knows how BOLI works from the inside and says he wants to fix its problems. He talks about how cases take too long, which is a real headache for workers trying to get help. Getting our cases handled fast means our problems, like safety issues, get solved quicker, showing he values efficient protection for workers. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his history working inside the Bureau of Labor and Industries and his clear plan to fix the agency. He understands that the agency has backlogs and slow service, and he wants to make it efficient and fair for everyone. This focus on practical solutions and getting the job done right is very important for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he has worked at BOLI before, which means he knows how the agency runs. However, there isn't much information about his strong commitment to fighting for workers' rights or specific plans to help our community, which is important for making real changes for working people in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Chris Lynch in the middle because he brings a critical eye to the Bureau of Labor and Industries, specifically noting its "politicization." His public statements and social media activity also show a concern for issues like the overwhelming influence of billionaires in politics and government transparency, which are important for holding power accountable. This emphasis on transparency and skepticism towards concentrated power is a crucial check on institutions. (0 votes)

State Senate District 13

#1
Courtney Neron

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her clear and consistent support for comprehensive reproductive and gender-affirming healthcare. This policy is vital for upholding individual bodily autonomy and ensuring healthcare decisions are based on science, not religious dogma, which is paramount for secular governance. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her strong support for abortion, which she calls "reproductive healthcare," directly opposes the sanctity of human life, the most fundamental moral value. This policy threatens innocent lives and undermines the divine gift of human existence, which is a grave sin in the eyes of God. (4 votes)

Reason I rank Courtney Neron first because her consistent fight for environmental protection, including bans on fracking and offshore drilling, aligns with the urgent need for climate action, which is a top priority for our generation's future. She champions policies for clean energy and sustainable transportation, which are essential for the health of our planet and communities. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because her legislative history clearly demonstrates a commitment to environmental protection. She co-chaired the Natural Resources Ways and Means Committee and actively opposed nuclear energy, advocating instead for truly clean energy solutions like solar and wind power, which aligns with prioritizing a sustainable future over corporate interests. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her history of supporting legislation like House Bill 4079 actively works against enforcing immigration laws, which undermines the safety and rule of law we need in Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Courtney Neron low because she is a Democrat who supports policies that expand government programs and spending, which usually means higher taxes for working people. She is committed to things like affordable housing and expanding mental health care, which often lead to more government intervention and increased burdens on taxpayers, rather than focusing on reducing the cost of living by cutting taxes. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong legislative history in protecting affordable housing, which is critical for service workers in Portland. She helped pass a bill that stops landlords from hitting people with huge rent increases, which makes a big difference in keeping a roof over our heads. This commitment to stable housing is my most important value, directly impacting my ability to live and work here. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because she has actively supported gun control measures. Her endorsement by Moms Demand Action shows she wants to restrict gun ownership, which directly threatens the right to bear arms for self-defense, a fundamental freedom. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Courtney Neron second because, even though she has supported some worker issues, she voted against letting striking workers get unemployment benefits. This really hurts working families when they are fighting for better conditions and makes it harder for us to stand up for ourselves. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policies directly tackle climate change, which is the most important issue facing our future. She actively supports clean energy investments and strong environmental protections like banning fracking, showing a clear commitment to a livable planet for everyone. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her strong support for comprehensive reproductive healthcare access, including abortion, goes against the sacred value of protecting innocent life. This stance undermines biblical principles regarding the sanctity of life from conception, which is a foundational moral issue for our faith. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because she has supported policies like doubling the minimum amount collected from electric customers for low-income assistance, which ultimately increases costs for all ratepayers. Such government-mandated spending and wealth redistribution can fuel inflation by raising utility bills for everyone. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Courtney Neron low because she voted for rent control, which I see as government meddling in what folks can do with their own property. This goes against the value of private property rights, which are essential for landowners and small business owners in rural areas to manage their livelihoods without state interference. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while she talks about tax relief for some, she supports measures that maintain government revenue and has proposed changes to the Oregon kicker. Changing the kicker could mean less money returned to taxpayers, which goes against the important value of reducing the overall tax burden on citizens. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Courtney Neron highest because her unwavering commitment to protecting reproductive healthcare decisions is absolutely vital for Oregonians, especially now. The ability to control one's own body is a fundamental human right, and her consistent advocacy ensures this critical value remains safeguarded for everyone in our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy on community safety focuses on 'proven solutions that prevent violence,' 'gun safety,' and 'criminal justice reforms.' While these are important, as an extreme crime voter, I prioritize immediate and strict law enforcement over social programs and reforms to combat the rampant crime in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy record strongly supports comprehensive gender rights, which is my most important value. She has consistently advocated for reproductive healthcare access and actively works to combat discrimination against transgender and gay individuals, ensuring all Oregonians have equal rights and protections. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Courtney Neron as the best candidate because she has clearly stated her commitment to defending every Oregonian's ability to make their own reproductive healthcare decisions, which is the most important value. She understands the importance of protecting access to safe and legal abortion, especially when basic human rights are challenged. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their history of supporting comprehensive reproductive healthcare access for all Oregonians. This policy undermines parents' fundamental right to guide their children's healthcare decisions, which is the most important value. It means children could access sensitive services without their parents knowing or agreeing. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong commitment to environmental protection, which is vital for our state's future. She has actively supported policies like banning fracking and offshore drilling, demonstrating a clear dedication to preserving Oregon's natural beauty and combating climate change, which affects us all, especially future generations. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because her focus on social programs and small business support, while beneficial for the general economy, has a less direct and immediate positive impact on the overall stock market. While her efforts to expand loans for small businesses are a plus, they don't offer the broad, immediate market-boosting effect of direct tax reduction. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her consistent record shows a deep commitment to expanding affordable healthcare for all Oregonians, including crucial access to reproductive care and mental health services. This directly impacts the well-being of our most vulnerable residents, upholding the vital progressive value of equitable access to essential human services. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Courtney Neron highest because her strong commitment to environmental protection and sustainable transportation aligns perfectly with the urgent need to address climate change and improve air quality in our urban areas. She advocates for investments in clean energy jobs and policies against air pollution, which directly benefits the health and future of Portland residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong policies supporting immigrants and refugees, which directly affect my community and uphold the value of human dignity. For example, she actively supported a bill for education plans for asylum seekers, refugees, and immigrants regardless of their status. This shows she truly cares about our children getting a good start in life, no matter where they come from. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their consistent advocacy for policies that uplift all members of society and protect our planet. Their work on expanding affordable healthcare, ensuring access to reproductive care, investing in education, and enacting strong environmental protections directly aligns with the humanist values of compassion, human rights, and evidence-based stewardship for collective well-being. For example, Senator Neron has helped secure comprehensive reproductive healthcare access for all Oregonians. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her public platform primarily focuses on broad social programs such as education, housing, and healthcare, without explicitly addressing the critical need for strong support for Israel or direct action against antisemitism in our state. While these issues are generally important, for an extreme Jewish resident, the paramount value is the safety and security of our people, both locally and in Israel, and a candidate's silence on these matters indicates a lack of alignment with our most urgent concerns. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her strong focus on improving public education is vital for our children's future, which is a key value for our families. As a former teacher, she understands what our schools need and has worked to get more resources for students. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her record is tied to the current state leadership and its policies, which haven't fixed the core problems like the ever-increasing cost of living and the visible struggles with homelessness in our communities. We need a different approach, and continuing with the same leadership won't deliver the changes we desperately need to restore common sense. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her history of championing paid family and medical leave and childcare reforms. These policies directly support working families and can help reduce the financial burden of childcare, which is a significant cost for many middle-income households in Portland. This reflects the important value of supporting families through practical, accessible services. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong commitment to environmental stewardship, which is crucial for our future, and her history of fighting for legislation like the Student Success Act that directly benefits young people and education. This shows she values investing in a sustainable future and supports the well-being and growth of students. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she has actively worked to make housing more stable for people like me. She led the passage of a bill that stops landlords from suddenly raising rents on affordable housing units, which is important for keeping a roof over my head. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong commitment to environmental stewardship and expanding public services like healthcare and education. This directly benefits our community by ensuring a sustainable future and a robust social safety net, which are crucial values for a livable city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy prioritizes accessible and affordable healthcare for all Oregonians, which is the most important value for voters. She views healthcare as a human right and has worked to lower prescription drug costs and expand mental health services. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Courtney Neron first because she is a strong advocate for comprehensive reproductive healthcare access, which is a fundamental value for ensuring bodily autonomy and equitable health services for everyone in Oregon. Her record shows she actively works to secure these essential rights for all. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Courtney Neron highest because her strong record in education directly benefits our children's future. As an educator, she helped secure billions for our schools through the Student Success Act, ensuring quality learning and opportunities, which is the most important investment for our community's success. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her strong commitment to environmental protection and social justice aligns with my core values. Her work to ban fracking and offshore drilling protects our planet, and her focus on addressing homelessness and discrimination directly impacts the well-being and equity of our community, which are vital for a progressive Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her strong advocacy for policies like comprehensive reproductive healthcare access goes against the core family values and moral principles that guide our community, undermining the sanctity of life and traditional family structures. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because, while her focus on strengthening schools and early education is good for the future of our state, it doesn't address the immediate financial burdens faced by old residents. While important, for me, managing the rising cost of living is a more pressing concern right now. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her strong commitment to environmental stewardship and thoughtful community planning directly preserves Oregon's natural beauty and fosters a stable, well-maintained community, which are deeply cherished values for traditional Portland residents. Her role as Chair of the Natural Resources Ways and Means Committee shows her dedication to this. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while she mentions community safety and affordable housing, her voting record on issues like providing education plans for asylum seekers and divesting from thermal coal shows a focus that doesn't prioritize the immediate financial burdens and practical needs of our suburban community as much as I would like. I believe our tax dollars should be focused on local issues that directly affect us. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while her work in education is important, her focus on broad social services and progressive policies does not seem to prioritize the strong moral and traditional community values essential for our way of life. The focus on specific cultural and religious preservation is not as evident, which is a core value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her strong environmental policies, like banning fracking and offshore drilling, could hurt our economy and limit energy options. My priority is less government interference and more economic freedom, not more regulations that can drive up costs. (0 votes)
#2
Glenn Lancaster

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his commitment to restoring safety and order in our communities, which is a vital aspect of upholding God's law. He clearly states that laws must be enforced, and this dedication to public safety is paramount for the well-being and moral fiber of our society. (4 votes)

Reason I rank Glenn Lancaster last because his policy to repeal the gas tax and oppose new tolls on I-5 would undermine critical funding for public transportation and infrastructure improvements. These investments are essential for creating a sustainable and equitable city with less reliance on cars, which is a core value for a progressive future. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy to repeal the gas tax and block new taxes directly harms our ability to fund essential public services and green infrastructure, which are critical for addressing climate change and supporting our communities. This stance goes against the progressive value of collective investment for a sustainable and equitable future. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate best because of his clear stance against higher taxes and his commitment to returning tax money to the people. This policy leaves more money in the hands of individuals and businesses, allowing them to make their own choices, which is essential for economic liberty and fostering a truly free market. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his platform to repeal the gas tax and block new tax increases directly threatens our ability to fund essential public services and infrastructure. This approach undermines the progressive investments needed for our schools and communities, which are critical for the collective good in Portland. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Glenn Lancaster as the worst candidate because his campaign materials and priorities do not mention reproductive healthcare or abortion rights, which is the most important issue for voters. This silence indicates that protecting abortion access is not a priority for him, which does not align with the essential value of reproductive freedom. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Glenn Lancaster as the best candidate because he promises to lower our cost of living by fighting against gas taxes. This is important because folks out here drive a lot for work and supplies, and every penny saved on fuel and taxes helps us keep more of our hard-earned money. He specifically wants to repeal the gas tax and stop new tax hikes. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on cutting taxes and "restoring order" doesn't prioritize the specific needs of our vulnerable communities, which is crucial for building a just society. He wants to cut gas taxes and block new taxes, but these policies often mean less money for programs that help our families with things like affordable housing and good schools. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Glenn Lancaster last because his policy proposals, such as repealing the gas tax and opposing I-5 tolls, directly undermine efforts to fund and improve public transit and infrastructure, which are vital for a functional urban environment. These actions would set back our progress on sustainable transportation and directly hurt our city's ability to reduce traffic congestion and carbon emissions. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy focus on "Restoring Safety and Order" and enforcing laws shows he understands the importance of upholding all laws, including immigration laws, which is vital for our state's security. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he focuses on general public safety without pushing for gun control. His platform does not mention restricting the right to bear arms, which is important for protecting our self-defense freedoms. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear policy to lower the cost of living by fighting new taxes and pushing back on the gas tax. This directly helps older residents like me on fixed incomes, making our daily expenses more manageable, which is a critical value for stability in our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his policy to repeal the gas tax and block new tax increases, which would directly reduce my household's everyday expenses. For a middle-income resident in Portland, keeping more money in my pocket is a critical value, and his stance offers a clear path to immediate financial relief. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his commitment to lowering taxes and preventing new tax increases, which directly boosts corporate profits. His plan to fight the gas tax and defend the constitutional kicker means more money for businesses and investors, directly impacting stock valuations and overall market health. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his commitment to lowering the cost of living by fighting new taxes and defending the constitutional kicker. This policy directly benefits high-income residents by protecting our wealth and ensuring fiscal responsibility in state government, which is crucial for a stable economic environment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their policy of wanting decisions to be made closer to the people. This approach empowers parents to have a greater say in their children's education and well-being, which is the most important value. This means families can have more control over what their kids learn and how schools operate. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Glenn Lancaster low because his focus on "restoring safety and order" through enforcement and accountability, without explicitly addressing systemic inequalities or advocating for criminal justice reform, suggests a continuation of policies that have historically harmed marginalized communities. True safety comes from equity, not just more enforcement. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his commitment to lowering the cost of living by fighting against new taxes, especially the gas tax, and opposing I-5 tolls. These policies directly benefit my family by keeping more money in our pockets and making our commutes more affordable, which is extremely important to us suburban residents who rely on our cars and are tired of rising expenses. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his four decades in the electric utility industry, a sector often tied to fossil fuels, raises concerns about his commitment to a rapid transition to renewable energy. His plan to repeal the gas tax would undermine efforts to reduce carbon emissions and fund critical sustainable infrastructure, which directly conflicts with protecting our planet for future generations. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his main policy focus on lowering the cost of living by repealing the gas tax doesn't get to the root of my struggles as a service worker. While lower gas prices would be nice, they don't solve the urgent need for affordable housing or better wages in Portland. My top priority is direct support for housing stability, not tax cuts that might not help me keep my apartment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform emphasizes restoring safety and order in our communities. For an extreme Jewish resident, the security of our community is paramount, as it directly impacts our ability to live and practice our faith without fear of antisemitic acts or general lawlessness. This focus on strong law enforcement and public safety aligns with the core value of self-preservation and protecting our communal spaces. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because their platform focuses heavily on repealing taxes and reducing government's role, which often leads to underfunding crucial social programs and environmental initiatives. Their emphasis on individualistic economic relief, such as fighting gas taxes and I-5 tolling, seems to prioritize immediate financial savings over long-term collective investment in public services, sustainable infrastructure, and addressing systemic inequalities, which are vital for a humanist society. For instance, a core part of his platform is to fight to repeal the gas tax and block new tax increases. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy to lower the cost of living directly helps families and small businesses, which is the most important value for our community's prosperity. He plans to fight against the gas tax and new taxes, meaning more money stays in our pockets for groceries and housing. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his promise to repeal the gas tax and defend the constitutional kicker directly addresses the crushing cost of living here. It's crucial we get our money back instead of watching Salem spend it on programs that don't seem to fix anything, and protecting taxpayer money is an important value for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Glenn Lancaster last because his policy to repeal the gas tax directly threatens our ability to fund essential public services and crucial environmental initiatives. Prioritizing tax cuts over investments in sustainable infrastructure and social programs shows a clear disregard for the collective well-being and future of our state, which is unacceptable. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his core policy is to lower the cost of living by fighting tax increases, which directly combats the inflationary burden on families. He wants to repeal the gas tax and stop new taxes, which means less money taken from our pockets by the government. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform emphasizes restoring common sense, fiscal responsibility, and public safety, which reflects the importance of a well-ordered society where families can thrive. While his specific stance on all life issues is not explicitly detailed, his commitment to traditional values and common sense governance suggests a respect for the sanctity of life and the moral order, which is crucial for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Glenn Lancaster as the best choice because he is a Republican who promises to fight against new taxes and push back on rising costs for families. He specifically wants to repeal the gas tax, which hits working Oregonians hard every day. This focus on fiscal responsibility and lowering the tax burden is the most important value for our state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on repealing the gas tax and blocking new taxes would likely cut funding for vital public services, like better public transit and housing programs, which are essential for creating a more equitable and sustainable Portland. This approach undervalues collective investment in community infrastructure and social support. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his main idea to help with the cost of living is to stop gas taxes and other taxes, which might not help me directly with my rent or healthcare. He talks about fixing housing policies, but doesn't give clear steps on how that will make housing affordable for folks like me who are struggling. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy to repeal the gas tax would undermine vital funding for public infrastructure and sustainable transportation initiatives. This approach prioritizes short-term cost savings over long-term community investments and environmental goals, which is a major concern for urban residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform does not clearly address specific healthcare policies, which is a major concern for voters. While he focuses on general issues like lowering the cost of living, there's no clear plan for improving healthcare access or affordability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Glenn Lancaster last because his plan to repeal the gas tax and block new tax increases would severely cut funding for essential public services and vital infrastructure projects, harming our ability to address critical state needs and invest in a sustainable future. This approach undermines the public good. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Glenn Lancaster lower because while I appreciate his focus on reducing taxes and improving public safety, his plans for education seem to critique current spending rather than propose clear, substantial investments to ensure our children's academic success, which is a top priority for our families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his focus on repealing the gas tax and blocking new tax increases. This approach would cut funding for essential public services like schools and infrastructure, which are crucial for maintaining our quality of life and supporting our communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his past involvement with "Compassionate Hands International," a self-described "Christ-centered" organization, indicates a potential for religious influence in his approach to governance. This raises serious concerns about maintaining a strict separation of church and state, which is a core value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his clear commitment to restoring safety and order and enforcing laws reflects the fundamental value of community stability and justice, which is essential for our families to thrive in peace. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Glenn Lancaster first because he wants to repeal the gas tax and fund replacing the Boone Bridge. This will put more money in our pockets from cheaper gas and create good, steady construction jobs, which shows he understands what working people need for real economic stability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his central policy of repealing the gas tax and blocking new tax increases, while aimed at reducing costs, could jeopardize funding for critical public services and environmental protections, undermining the long-term quality of life and unique character that traditional Portlanders value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his policy to restore safety and order, which directly impacts the well-being and moral fabric of our communities. A strong and secure society is a foundation for living according to our values, and his focus on accountability ensures that laws are respected and justice prevails for all. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy to fight against the gas tax directly helps keep more money in my pocket, which is crucial for my financial liberty. Gas prices are too high in Oregon, and repealing this tax would make a noticeable difference in my everyday expenses. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform does not prioritize climate action, which is essential for protecting our environment. His call to "stop the gas tax" works against efforts to reduce carbon emissions and move towards a cleaner future. (0 votes)

State Senate District 15

#1
Janeen Sollman

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while she has supported some positive environmental legislation, like plastic reduction and recycling modernization, her history includes being an 'industry-friendly' Democrat and taking corporate money. This compromises the essential Green value of ecological wisdom by prioritizing corporate interests over long-term environmental protection, as seen in her push for industrial land annexation over protected farmland. (8 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she has a strong record on protecting our environment and supporting reproductive and trans rights, which I totally care about. But, it's a huge red flag that she's considered 'industry-friendly' and has supported tax breaks for giant corporations instead of funding our community. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because while she has a good record on environmental protection and social justice, her actions regarding land use are concerning. She championed a bill to convert 1,700 acres of protected farmland for industry in her district, which contradicts the vital importance of preserving our natural environment and prioritizing community-led development over corporate interests. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her strong support for abortion rights and expanded protections for transgender people directly contradicts fundamental Islamic moral and family values. Our faith emphasizes the sanctity of life and adherence to traditional family structures, and her legislative priorities on these matters are a clear and unacceptable divergence from these divine laws. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because of her clear and active history of supporting anti-gun legislation. She has championed bills that restrict firearm storage, ban rapid-fire devices, and allow local governments to prohibit guns in public places. These policies directly attack our Second Amendment rights and make law-abiding citizens less safe by limiting their ability to protect themselves. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her unwavering support for abortion rights and her efforts to expand access to such services directly oppose the sanctity of human life, which is the most important value. Her actions, like sponsoring legislation for reproductive health and restoring Planned Parenthood funding, harm the innocent and undermine the moral foundations cherished by many voters. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because of her history of supporting measures that could increase the tax burden on residents or grant corporate tax breaks. She was a lead sponsor of a bill that originally aimed to double property tax breaks for data centers and supported a bill ensuring 10-year property tax waivers for large corporations, which can shift the tax burden onto local taxpayers and reduce funds for essential public services in Portland. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her introduction of the Oregon JOBS Act, which aims to expand research and development tax credits and strengthen enterprise zones, directly supports business growth and investment, a key factor for a thriving stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policies actively undermine law enforcement and traditional values. She supports new protections for immigrant communities, including stopping ICE agents from concealing their identities, which makes it harder to enforce our laws and protect our state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policies expand protections for transgender people and medical providers, which limits parents' ability to guide their children's healthcare decisions. This undermines parental authority, which is essential for raising children according to family values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their proven history of championing reproductive rights and working to lower medical costs for families. Janeen Sollman has sponsored the Reproductive Health Equity Act and helped expand provider networks, showing a clear commitment to protecting crucial healthcare access. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy focus on tackling rising costs for working families directly addresses my financial concerns, which is critical for maintaining my family's stability. For example, she supports legislation to lower medical and housing costs and champions 'Right to Repair' laws, which can save money on electronics. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because while she has a record of promoting environmental legislation, including working on a cap-and-invest program, her past support for a bill that would have allowed industrial development on farmland for power-hungry data centers raises concerns about prioritizing corporate expansion over critical climate impacts. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her history shows she actively fights against federal immigration enforcement. She supported laws to protect immigrants from federal agents, like stopping agents from hiding their identities. This weakens our ability to enforce immigration laws and undermines national sovereignty, which is a major concern for our state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong legislative history in protecting the environment and advocating for science-based solutions. As Chair of the Senate Energy & Environment Committee, she consistently supports legislation to lower carbon emissions and modernize recycling, which is vital for the long-term, rational stewardship of our planet. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because even though she's helped with affordable housing and the Earned Income Tax Credit, I'm worried about her votes that seem to help big businesses get tax breaks instead of putting that money into our schools and services. It feels like she sometimes puts corporations ahead of working families, and we need every penny for our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because, while she is a Democrat, her legislative record shows some willingness to be pragmatic and focus on economic development that can bring jobs to our community, which is a practical concern for families. Her support for the Oregon JOBS Act, which aims to create family-wage manufacturing jobs, shows a focus on economic stability for Oregonians. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her support for extensive environmental regulations, such as plastic bans and carbon emission reductions, and gun control measures significantly restricts individual freedoms and the free market, undermining personal choice and economic liberty. Such policies expand government control into areas where individuals should be free to make their own decisions. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her legislative history of fighting for inclusive education, specifically sponsoring a bill to require Holocaust and genocide instruction in Oregon schools. This policy is crucial for educating future generations about the dangers of hate and promoting the vital Jewish value of historical memory and remembrance, ensuring such atrocities are never forgotten. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her consistent record on environmental protection, including efforts to reduce plastic waste and lower carbon emissions, which is vital for the long-term well-being of all humans. She also supports protections for transgender people and immigrants, showing compassion for marginalized groups, though her record is less directly challenging of corporate power than my top choice. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her strong focus on economic development and support for high-wage industries, which is vital for Oregon's prosperity. She introduced the Oregon JOBS Act to attract advanced manufacturing and expand tax credits, which directly benefits our state's economy and creates high-paying jobs. This commitment to economic growth and a favorable business climate is the most important value for ensuring continued wealth and investment in Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her history of supporting protections for immigrant communities, including making healthcare and education safer, demonstrating a valuable commitment to equity and well-being for all residents in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her legislative history demonstrates a strong commitment to gender rights, as shown by her work to protect and expand abortion access and to pass legislation safeguarding transgender individuals and their medical providers in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because she has shown a good grasp of important issues like environmental protection and affordable housing, which are critical for Portland. Her work on lowering carbon emissions and supporting investments in shelters helps keep our state livable and people housed, and these are fundamental values for our community. However, her past support for tax breaks that could benefit data centers makes me cautious, as we need leaders who prioritize people over corporate profits. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while she supports lowering housing costs and workers' rights, her backing of tax credits for large industrial sites, even if they aren't stand-alone data centers, raises concerns. We need to make sure our state prioritizes people over corporate giveaways that might hurt our schools and public services. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because she has a strong record on protecting reproductive rights and fighting for climate action, like with the Plastic Bag Ban and new cap-and-invest proposals. These actions are vital for our future, showing a commitment to bodily autonomy and environmental stewardship, which are fundamental values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because while she mentions tackling rising costs, her support for policies that may offer substantial tax waivers to large corporations could lead to state revenue shortfalls or shifted tax burdens, potentially increasing inflationary pressure on residents. She supports Governor's Bill 4084, which could grant 10-year property tax waivers to "Mega-Corps". (0 votes)

Reason I rank Janeen Sollman low because, as a Democrat, she supports policies like expanded environmental regulations, which hinder economic growth and burden businesses with unnecessary costs, undermining free markets. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while she supports environmental protection and social justice, her support for policies that could benefit large corporations and potentially impact rural land is concerning. It's important to have leaders who protect our planet, but not at the expense of local communities or by granting special favors to big tech. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because she voted for new gun control laws that take away our right to protect ourselves and our property. Our freedom to own guns is the most important value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her legislative record shows a strong focus on increasing affordable housing and protecting our environment, which are crucial for the stability and well-being of all residents in the Portland metro area. Her work on issues like homelessness and climate change directly benefits our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their proven history of supporting critical environmental policies, which is vital for the long-term health and sustainability of our community. As Chair of the Senate Energy & Environment Committee, Janeen Sollman has actively supported legislation to lower carbon emissions and reduce plastic waste, showing a commitment to protecting our planet. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her work on housing and environmental issues, but she doesn't go far enough to challenge corporate power. She has pushed for affordable housing and reducing plastic waste, which are important. However, her support for the Oregon JOBS Act, which gives land to advanced manufacturing, raises questions about whether it truly benefits our communities or just big business. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her focus on economic development through the Oregon JOBS Act, which aims to create high-wage manufacturing jobs, and her work on public safety initiatives. However, her past actions, like opposing affordable housing development in Woodburn while supporting industrial growth in her own district, show a concerning prioritization. This raises questions about equitable development and community-focused resource allocation, which is a key value for our district's diverse population. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Janeen Sollman second because she has a strong record fighting for our environment, like banning plastic bags, which is critical for protecting our precious Oregon. However, I am concerned about her past votes and contributions from large corporations. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her proven legislative record on environmental protection and support for veterans demonstrates a commitment to long-term community well-being and caring for those who have served. An old resident values experience and tangible results that protect our natural resources and support our elder community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while she talks about affordable housing and lowering costs, her actions don't always match up. She has accepted money from big energy companies and sponsored a bill that opens up rural land for data centers, which drains our resources. This feels like she's helping corporations more than us regular folks. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Janeen Sollman medium because her work on reducing plastic waste, like the plastic bag ban, shows she cares about our environment, which is important for preserving Oregon's natural beauty. However, her support for tax breaks benefiting large data centers is a concern for me as it takes away from our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her legislative work, specifically the Oregon JOBS Act, focuses on attracting advanced manufacturing jobs while blocking stand-alone data centers and retail warehouses. This policy is important because it promotes stable, family-wage employment and manages commercial sprawl, which directly protects the character and infrastructure of our suburban communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she supports community safety and addressing rising costs, which can help families thrive. However, her strong advocacy for expanding protections for transgender people and specific immigrant community policies may not fully align with the traditional societal values that uphold dharma in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Janeen Sollman second because she has fought for immigrant communities, like making sure ICE agents can't hide who they are and protecting healthcare for our families. However, I worry about her votes that have helped big businesses over striking workers and her support for industrial projects that change protected land, which doesn't seem to put our people first. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while she's a Democrat, she has shown some willingness to work on practical issues like creating manufacturing jobs and pushing for accountable solutions to homelessness. Her support for the Oregon JOBS Act could bring good-paying jobs to the area. We need people who can actually get things done for the economy, not just talk about it. (0 votes)
#2
Nelly Donis-Purcell

Reason I rank this candidate low because of the complete lack of information regarding their policy positions, which prevents voters from making an informed choice about their commitment to our community's progressive values. Without a clear platform or public statements, it is impossible to assess how they would represent our interests in the State Senate. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because I could not find any detailed information about her specific policy positions, past actions, or a clear platform for State Senate District 15. Without a clear understanding of her priorities and how she plans to address critical community issues like economic stability, education, and public safety, it is impossible to evaluate her potential effectiveness or alignment with our district's values. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I can't find clear information about what she stands for. As a manual worker, I need to know a candidate's policies on jobs, housing, and keeping our community safe. Without a clear platform, it's hard to trust she'll fight for us. (2 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because there is not enough public information available about her stances on issues critical to the sanctity of life and traditional family values. Without clear positions on these most important matters, it is difficult to confidently support her, leaving her as an uncertain choice for voters who prioritize these moral principles. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough public information available about her specific policy stances or legislative priorities to assess her alignment with humanist values. While her background in science is positive, without clear commitments to social justice, environmental protection, or equitable healthcare, it's impossible to support her effectively. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available regarding her stance on economic policies or how she plans to address inflation. It is critical to know a candidate's plan for managing rising costs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I can't find clear information on what she believes about issues important to rural folks, like gun rights or protecting our land from government. Without knowing her stand, it's hard to trust she'll represent us right. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear information available regarding her specific economic policies or stance on business regulation and taxes for Oregon State Senate District 15, which creates significant uncertainty for stock market investors. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there isn't enough information available about her specific policy plans to make an informed decision about how she would impact my financial stability or community needs. As a middle-income resident, I need clear proposals to evaluate. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available public information detailing her specific stances or actions on critical gender rights issues, such as reproductive freedom or LGBTQ+ protections, which makes it impossible to confidently support her candidacy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Democratic candidate, her general party platform often supports policies that can limit parental control over their children's education and healthcare decisions. This lack of explicit commitment to parental rights is a major concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no specific information available about her stance on taxes or her voting record on tax-related issues. Without a clear position on taxation, it is impossible to determine if she would prioritize reducing the tax burden on Portland residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is virtually no public information available regarding her policy stances or legislative priorities for State Senate District 15. The lack of transparency on key issues makes it impossible to assess how she would represent our suburban interests. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate third because there isn't much clear information about what she stands for on issues important to people like me. While she is a Democrat, I need to know more about her specific plans for housing, healthcare, and jobs before I can feel confident she'll truly fight for low-income families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available information on her specific policies or stance regarding climate change or environmental protection in Oregon. Without a clear record or stated position, it is impossible to assess her commitment to this critical issue, which is my only voting priority. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough public information available about her specific policies or history regarding crime and public safety in Oregon. For a single-issue voter, the lack of a clear stance on fighting crime means I cannot confidently support her, as public safety is the most important value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there's not enough clear information about her policies and what she stands for. As a patient care coordinator, she might understand some community needs, but without a strong platform on civil rights, housing equity, or challenging systemic issues, it's hard to trust she'll fight for us. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is very little public information available about her specific policy stances or priorities. Without clear positions on environmental protection, social justice, or corporate influence, it is impossible to determine if she aligns with the core Green Party values crucial for our district's future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because, like Harold Hutchison, I found no specific public information on their immigration policies or past actions. While not ideal, this lack of action or stated position means they haven't openly supported policies that go against secure borders and legal immigration, which is crucial for our community's integrity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while her background as a patient care coordinator suggests a potential understanding of healthcare needs, the lack of specific policy information makes it difficult to fully assess her alignment with the community's priorities. An old resident needs to know a candidate's concrete plans to make an informed decision. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Democrat in Oregon, her party's platform often supports stricter gun control, including universal background checks and magazine limits. While there's no direct statement from her, it's highly likely she would vote for policies that infringe on our gun rights, which is a critical concern for protecting personal freedom. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, while they are a Democratic Party candidate and work as a patient care coordinator, there is a lack of specific information on their healthcare policy stances. Supporting healthcare access and affordability is the most important value, and without clear policy details, it's hard to fully assess their commitment to my single issue. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available regarding her specific policy positions or legislative priorities. Without a clear understanding of her stances on issues critical to our community, such as social justice, education, or safety, I cannot determine how she would uphold the Jewish value of informed decision-making and active participation in civic life. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is little public information available about her specific policy stances. Without clear statements or a track record that demonstrates alignment with our core values, it is difficult to confidently support her. Prudence dictates caution when a candidate's positions are largely unknown, as they may unintentionally pursue policies that conflict with our principles. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate third because while she is a Democrat, there is no explicit information on her stance on abortion or reproductive rights available. In Oregon, the Democratic party generally supports abortion access, which gives some indication. However, without a clear statement, her commitment to protecting reproductive freedom is not as strongly evidenced as other candidates, leaving some uncertainty about this critical value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate third due to the limited information available regarding her specific policy stances. As a Democratic challenger, it is reasonable to expect her platform might lean towards increased social spending, which could lead to higher taxes or regulations on businesses and high-income earners. The lack of clarity around her economic agenda makes her a less predictable choice, and financial predictability is a key value for long-term planning. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough clear information available about her specific policy priorities or legislative history to confidently assess her alignment with the critical needs of working and immigrant families in our district. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because as a Democrat, she is likely to support government programs and regulations that expand state power and increase taxpayer burdens, which goes against the principles of limited government and individual financial freedom. While specific policies are not yet detailed, the party platform generally involves more collective control over individual choices. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate third because while she is running as a Democrat, there isn't enough specific information about her platform to really understand where she stands on the crucial, 'extreme' issues that matter most to me. Her background as a patient care coordinator is good, as healthcare access is important, but I need to see more detailed policy positions to confidently support her over candidates with clearer progressive agendas. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough public information available about her specific policy stances. It's hard to support a candidate when I don't know where they stand on the issues that matter most to working families in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there isn't enough clear information about her specific policy stances, especially on extreme progressive issues that are so important to me. This lack of a strong public platform makes it hard to trust she will advocate fiercely for necessary changes, impacting our community's ability to move forward with bold action. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Nelly Donis-Purcell very low because she is a Democrat, and without clear policy statements, she likely supports the same big government, high-tax agenda that harms Oregon's economy and limits individual freedom. Her party affiliation indicates she would not stand for conservative values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there's not enough clear information about her specific policy positions or how she plans to address the issues important to Portland residents. Voters need to know a candidate's stance on key issues like environmental protection and social equity to make an informed choice, and her platform remains largely undefined. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is a lack of publicly available information regarding her specific policy positions or what she aims to achieve if elected. Without clear stances on key issues, it is impossible to assess how she would serve the community's needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, while she is a Democrat, there is less public information about her specific extreme policies. This suggests she might be less actively pushing the radical agenda seen in other candidates, which is a slight preference given the options. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate third because there is not enough clear information available about her specific policy stances to make an informed decision, beyond her being a Democrat. Without a detailed platform, it is difficult to determine how she would uphold the values important to our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate third because there is not enough specific policy information available to fully understand her alignment with crucial urban progressive values. While she is running as a Democrat, without a clear record or detailed platform, it's hard to confidently support her over candidates with established stances on environmental protection, social justice, and affordable housing. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Nelly Donis-Purcell third because she is a Democrat, which usually means she shares some of my values, but there isn't enough clear information about her specific policy plans for our district to feel confident in her ability to truly shake things up. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because of her strong academic background in biochemistry and chemistry, which suggests a foundation in scientific literacy and critical thinking. This commitment to evidence-based understanding is a fundamental value for rational governance, even though her specific policy stances are not widely detailed. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Nelly Donis-Purcell low because there isn't enough clear information about her specific policy positions for our district. While she is running in the Democratic primary, the lack of a detailed platform makes it hard to see how she would truly uphold the traditional values important to our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Nelly Donis-Purcell third because, while she is a Democrat, I haven't seen enough clear information about her specific plans for issues that really matter to us, like protecting immigrant rights or making housing affordable. It's important to know exactly how a candidate will fight for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there's simply not enough information available on her specific policy stances or priorities. I can't vote for someone when I don't know what they stand for or how they plan to address the real problems facing our community. We need transparency and clear plans from our leaders. (0 votes)
#3
Myrna Munoz

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her strong commitment to civil rights and fighting corporate power, which directly impacts our communities. She vows to protect immigrant families from ICE, fully fund public education without giving tax breaks to big corporations, and make sure healthcare is a human right for everyone. This shows she prioritizes people over profits, which is what we need. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because she is a true champion for our community's most vulnerable. Her firm stance against corporate tax breaks, especially for huge data centers, means more money for our underfunded public schools, which is absolutely vital for our children's future. She's not taking orders from big corporations like the incumbent, but from working families, and that commitment to economic justice is paramount for a fair Oregon. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because she is a strong advocate for immigrant communities, even stating that immigrant families are living in fear from federal actions. She criticizes current leadership for not being compassionate enough regarding immigration enforcement. This shows a clear stance against strong immigration enforcement, directly opposing my belief in maintaining the rule of law and secure borders, which is essential for public safety. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her platform prioritizes civil rights, including strong support for reproductive freedom and gender-affirming care, which is crucial for ensuring bodily autonomy and equality for all genders. Her personal story about reproductive healthcare makes her commitment incredibly clear. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Myrna Munoz first because her main focus is civil rights for immigrant families, which is what our community needs to feel safe. She understands the fear our families face from intimidation and wants to fully fund our public schools without corporate money. This shows she truly puts our community and its most vulnerable members first. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her advocacy for fully funded public schools, universal healthcare, and opposition to tax breaks for businesses suggests an expansive view of government's role in the economy and individual lives, directly conflicting with free-market principles and individual economic autonomy. Her stance on economic justice often means wealth redistribution through coercive taxation. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Myrna Munoz highest because she bravely challenges big corporations like data centers that get tax breaks while our communities suffer, showing she prioritizes working families and not corporate profits, which is vital for real economic justice in our state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her strong opposition to corporate tax breaks and 'corporate giveaways,' as well as her stance against tax incentives for data centers, would likely increase business costs and reduce corporate profitability, negatively impacting the stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because she fights against big corporations getting tax breaks that take money away from our schools and public services. This means more resources for our kids and better support for our community, which is super important for families like mine trying to get by. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her focus on "inclusive education systems" and centering "children our treasures" without explicitly affirming parental authority suggests a government-centric approach to raising children. This weakens the fundamental right of parents to direct their children's upbringing. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her strong stance on fully funding public schools and her opposition to tax breaks for data centers that she argues divert funds from education. This focus on local school funding is crucial for ensuring quality education and protecting our property values in the suburbs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her strong opposition to expanding data centers, which consume massive amounts of power and water, directly addresses critical climate concerns in Oregon. Her willingness to fight against corporate interests for environmental protection aligns with the urgent need to preserve our natural resources. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because she is a strong union leader who fights for working families and against corporate greed. She wants to stop tax breaks for big data centers that use too much water and power, and instead put money into our schools and healthcare. This shows she truly cares about our community's needs, not just big businesses. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform strongly emphasizes civil rights for specific immigrant communities and gender-affirming care. While education and healthcare are important, these specific social policies could be seen as challenging the traditional family and social structures that are vital for upholding dharma within our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong commitment to civil rights for immigrant families and her policy to fully fund public schools, which directly promotes social justice and the development of critical thinking crucial for a thriving society. Her advocacy for vulnerable communities and educational equity aligns perfectly with humanist values of compassion and reason. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her campaign explicitly rejects corporate donations and focuses on empowering working families, which directly addresses the critical Green value of grassroots democracy and economic justice. It is vital to elect leaders who are beholden to the people, not corporations like Amazon or Big Pharma, to ensure policies truly benefit our communities and planet. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Democrat and a progressive, her general platform priorities do not include defending Second Amendment rights. The Democratic Party in Oregon tends to favor more gun control, and without any statements to the contrary, it is reasonable to expect she would support measures that restrict gun ownership. This threatens the foundational right to self-defense. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong policy stance against corporate tax breaks, which directly affects local taxpayers. She opposes tax incentives for large data centers, arguing that this revenue is needed for public services like schools, fire, police, and roads, which directly benefits Portland residents by ensuring essential services are funded without increasing our tax burden. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their clear and strong policy supporting universal healthcare, which is essential for ensuring all Oregonians have access to care. Myrna Munoz has explicitly stated a commitment to fighting for universal healthcare, strengthening the Oregon Health Plan, and protecting reproductive and gender-affirming care, which directly addresses the most important value of healthcare as a basic right for every person. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her unwavering commitment to civil rights and fully funding public education, which are foundational values for a just society. Her opposition to corporate tax breaks for data centers that divert funds from essential public services like schools demonstrates a dedication to ensuring resources directly benefit our children and communities, reflecting the Jewish value of communal responsibility and equitable resource distribution. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because she openly opposes tax breaks for data centers and other corporate investments, stating that education money should not be used for businesses to make more money. This stance suggests a policy direction that would likely increase the tax burden on corporations and high-income individuals, and it could hinder crucial economic development that benefits the entire state. Protecting business incentives and fostering an environment for wealth creation is a primary value for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her core policy priority is civil rights for immigrant families, which directly addresses the fear and intimidation faced by our community, and this commitment to justice is the most important value for protecting vulnerable populations in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy priorities are all about the people, not corporations. She's fighting for civil rights for immigrant families and wants to fully fund our public schools by ending tax breaks for big companies, which is so important for our future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy on fully funding public schools and stopping tax breaks for corporations is crucial. Working families in Portland see our schools struggling while big businesses get sweetheart deals, which directly hurts our kids and our community's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her campaign emphasizes civil rights and progressive values, rather than a strong focus on combating crime through stricter enforcement. My primary concern is public safety, and her focus on equity and social justice, while important to some, does not directly address the need for a tougher stance on criminal activity in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because she is running as a truly progressive alternative, actively criticizing the incumbent for taking money from big corporations and supporting land expansions. This shows a deep commitment to putting working families and the environment first, which is the most important value for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her strong support for fully funding public education and ensuring healthcare as a right aligns with important community values for my family's future and well-being. She also promises to fight for working families, not corporate donors. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Myrna Munoz lowest because her progressive policies, such as making healthcare a human right and opposing tax breaks for businesses, would lead to massive government spending and increased taxes, crushing our state's economy and individual prosperity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because she champions civil rights and fully funding public education for all students, especially by pushing back against corporate tax breaks that drain resources from our schools. It is crucial to prioritize equitable education and protect our communities from corporate influence, and her stand against giving data centers more tax breaks shows she truly cares about working families over big business. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she talks about protecting our farmlands and natural places, which is good for our way of life. Taking care of our land and water is important for rural families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her platform emphasizes defending civil rights and challenging corporate influence, which aligns perfectly with my value of ensuring social and economic justice for all working families in Oregon. She stands up for the vulnerable and for fully funded public services over corporate tax breaks. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy alignment with fighting corporate influence, which affects all voters by ensuring decisions are made for the people, prioritizing democratic values and economic justice. Myrna Munoz explicitly states she takes orders from working families, not corporate donors, and aims to defend civil rights, fully fund public education, and make healthcare a human right. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong stance on civil rights and fully funding public education. Her commitment to fighting for working families and immigrant communities, particularly against racially targeted intimidation, directly addresses critical needs for community safety and well-being. This reflects the vital importance of protecting vulnerable communities and ensuring equitable access to essential services. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because she promotes a divisive narrative that paints law enforcement as a threat to immigrant families, claiming they live in fear from 'racially targeted intimidation.' This kind of rhetoric creates instability and undermines trust in our institutions, which is very harmful to our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her strong commitment to rejecting corporate money and fighting against tax breaks for large corporations like data centers. This directly benefits working families by ensuring public services are fully funded, which is crucial for achieving economic justice and equitable communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because her strong progressive agenda, particularly her focus on expanding protections for immigrant families and her alignment with the Working Families Party, indicates a move away from traditional values and fiscal responsibility. She explicitly states her campaign is about 'fighting back against right-wing agendas and austerity measures,' which directly opposes my conservative Christian principles. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her unwavering commitment to civil rights and her strong stance against corporate tax breaks. She has actively fought against giving data centers more tax breaks, which is crucial for ensuring our schools and essential services are fully funded instead of benefiting big corporations. This directly supports our community's need for economic justice and proper public funding. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she shows a strong commitment to justice and protecting vulnerable immigrant and farm-working families. Her deep ties to these communities and her advocacy against perceived lack of compassion from leadership on immigration enforcement directly align with the Islamic principle of standing up for the oppressed and ensuring justice for all people. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her strong advocacy for fully funding public services like education and healthcare, combined with her clear opposition to tax breaks for large corporations that strain local resources, aligns with the value of community investment and fiscal responsibility. An old resident of Portland would appreciate ensuring public funds benefit the people, not just big businesses. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Myrna Munoz high because her policy to stop corporate tax breaks and instead fully fund our local schools, parks, and roads speaks directly to keeping Portland's heart alive. It ensures our community's well-being matters more than big corporations, which is essential for our traditional values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because her platform emphasizes accessible healthcare and civil rights, which are key to protecting abortion access. As a Democrat endorsed by progressive groups, her commitment to making healthcare a human right strongly suggests support for reproductive freedom. This aligns with the critical value of ensuring everyone can access necessary medical care, including abortion. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her focus seems too narrow, prioritizing specific civil rights issues for immigrant communities and criticizing corporate tax breaks. While public schools need funding, her approach appears to be more about taking aim at businesses than creating a strong economic base for everyone. We need to focus on broad economic growth and public safety for all residents. (0 votes)
#4
Harold Hutchison

Reason I rank this candidate last because his views, particularly on social issues, are completely out of line with the values of our community in Portland. Reporting shows his affiliation with content that criticizes transgender lawmakers and progressive social policies, which is a direct attack on the equality and inclusivity we deeply cherish here. This stance is simply unacceptable and threatens the fabric of our diverse society. (10 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear support for our Second Amendment rights. As a writer for Ammoland.com, he has shown a consistent stance against gun control measures. Protecting the right to keep and bear arms is essential for self-defense and liberty, and his background demonstrates a dedication to this value. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he stands against the corruption of our youth and the promotion of indecency. His public criticism of those who suggest pornography can be educational for children shows a commitment to moral uprightness, which is an essential value in our faith for safeguarding society and protecting the innocence of the next generation. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate first because his conservative stance on social issues aligns with my Christian faith and values, especially his critical view of progressive ideas in education which I believe protect our children. He has challenged concepts like pornography being seen as 'educational' for 'queer kids,' which upholds a biblical view of innocence and family. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because his affiliation with conservative media and expressed views, such as dismissing concerns about energy shortages, directly contradict the fundamental Green value of ecological wisdom and sustainable energy. Electing someone with such a stance would actively undermine efforts to address climate change and transition to a green economy in Oregon. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no detailed information about his platform or policy positions, making it impossible to assess how he would address the crucial economic and social concerns facing middle-income families in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his public commentary and affiliations with conservative news outlets, specifically his reporting that celebrates policies blocking transgender women from sports, clearly show he opposes fundamental gender rights and inclusivity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his Republican party affiliation and the conservative views associated with articles by someone with his name, especially those critical of trans rights, are completely against my values and what Portland stands for. It's just a no-go for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no public information about his policy positions. Without clear stances on issues like workers' rights, affordable housing, or public services, I cannot support a candidate who may not represent the needs of service workers in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Harold Hutchison last because he is a Republican, and typically their policies do not support what our community needs, especially when it comes to helping immigrants, fighting for social justice, or protecting workers. I haven't found anything to show he would stand up for our values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because there's almost no information about his plans or what he believes in that would help low-income families. Without knowing his specific ideas for things like affordable housing or healthcare, I can't trust he would work to make life better for people struggling like me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because I could not find any information on their stance regarding immigration. This means they have not actively promoted policies that undermine immigration enforcement or encourage illegal immigration, which is vital for our state's security and upholding the rule of law. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough specific information available about his policy positions on issues critical to our suburban community. Without a clear understanding of his plans for property taxes, public safety, or local development, it's difficult to confidently support his candidacy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no information available on their specific healthcare policies. As a Republican candidate and a contributor to a conservative news outlet, their stance on expanding healthcare access and affordability for all Oregonians is unclear, which is the most important issue for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because as a Republican, his general party affiliation suggests a leaning towards policies that typically favor businesses and investors, such as lower taxes and reduced regulation, which can positively impact the stock market, even though his specific state-level economic platform is not explicitly detailed. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his publicly available writings for conservative news outlets suggest views that are out of step with the progressive values of Portland. It is important to elect leaders who will champion environmental action and social justice, and his past criticisms of progressive policies indicate a strong disagreement with these core values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his conservative views do not align with the needs of our community. His background with a conservative news foundation suggests he would not advocate for the racial justice, police reform, or equitable housing policies that are critical for Portland's Black residents. We need leaders who understand systemic oppression, not those who enable it. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his conservative views, as evidenced by his contributions to right-leaning media outlets, are completely out of sync with the values important to our urban community. His articles discussing skepticism on energy shortages and criticism of progressive social issues demonstrate a fundamental opposition to the environmental and social justice progress we urgently need. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his association with openly conservative media outlets like The Daily Caller News Foundation indicates a likely alignment with ideologies that often conflict with secular, progressive values. This suggests a potential disregard for evidence-based policymaking in areas like social justice and environmental protection, which are essential for a rational and inclusive society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because he is running as a Republican, and the Republican party platform generally opposes abortion rights. This position directly conflicts with the fundamental value of reproductive freedom and bodily autonomy, which is absolutely essential for individuals to make their own healthcare decisions. His party affiliation suggests he would not support abortion access, which is unacceptable. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his contributions to conservative media suggest policy positions that are unlikely to align with the progressive values and community support vital for immigrant and working families in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, while specific state-level crime policies are not clear, his background as a contributor to 'The Daily Signal' suggests a conservative perspective. This implies a potential alignment with stronger law enforcement and public safety measures, which is crucial for reducing crime in our city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because, as a Republican, his political views would likely oppose key progressive policies on climate change, social justice, and reproductive rights. This would actively harm the progress we need in Oregon and directly contradicts the core values of environmental protection and human rights that are crucial for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no public information available regarding his stance on economic policies or how he plans to address inflation. It is critical to know a candidate's plan for managing rising costs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his work as a contributor for a conservative news foundation suggests a strong alignment with the sanctity of life and traditional moral values. This commitment to protecting innocent life and upholding family-centered principles is the most important value, and his implied stance offers hope for policies that reflect these beliefs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, as a Republican, there is a general expectation that he would favor lower taxes and less government spending. While there is no specific information available on his tax policies, the Republican platform typically prioritizes tax reduction, which is important for Portland taxpayers. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Harold Hutchison highest because he is the only Republican candidate, and his principles align with fiscal conservatism and individual liberty, which are critical for reducing government waste and protecting citizens' freedoms in Oregon. He represents a much-needed opposition to the progressive agenda. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his Republican party ties generally align with protecting our Second Amendment rights, which is fundamental to our freedom. Keeping our right to own guns without city folks telling us what to do is the most important value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his stated focus on energy and finance, combined with his Republican affiliation and contributions to conservative media, does not align with the progressive social justice and community-focused values that are paramount. His platform lacks any demonstrated commitment to civil rights, inclusive education, or protecting vulnerable populations, which are central to the Jewish value of Tikkun Olam (repairing the world). (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his affiliation with the Republican party typically indicates a platform that does not align with the progressive social and environmental policies that are fundamentally important for the continued livability and equitable growth of Portland and its surrounding communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their affiliation with the Republican Party signals a fundamental disagreement with the progressive policies and social justice initiatives that are essential for the well-being and equity of our Portland community. His party's platform typically opposes many of the values I hold dear. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough specific information on his platform for State Senate District 15 that directly addresses the needs of our community, such as economic opportunity, education funding, or local public safety. While his general conservative writings are available, they lack the specific local policy proposals needed to assess his potential impact on our district's critical issues. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he supports strong law enforcement and securing our borders. He recently highlighted how Democrats blocked a bill to notify ICE when illegal immigrants are arrested for violent crimes, which is crucial for public safety and protecting our community from dangerous elements. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because, as a Republican, Harold Hutchison is likely to support policies that promote fiscal conservatism and lower taxes. While specific policy details are not widely available, a general Republican platform often aligns with reducing the tax burden and fostering a more business-friendly environment, which is crucial for preserving and growing personal wealth. The value of fiscal prudence is important for a stable economic future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his stated philosophy of campaigning against 'leaning on government control too much' and advocating for 'personal authority and responsibility' directly conflicts with the progressive value of collective responsibility and robust government-led social programs. This approach would harm vulnerable communities by dismantling essential social safety nets and public services. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Harold Hutchison last because, as a Republican, his platform likely won't align with the progressive values we hold dear here in Portland, especially when it comes to protecting our environment and supporting our most vulnerable residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because as a Republican candidate, his general policy approach may not align with the progressive values typically held by Portland residents, and without specific policy positions available, it is hard to see how he would advocate for the community's established priorities. An old resident in Portland looks for candidates who explicitly support local progressive values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no clear information about his political platform for this election. A candidate needs to tell us what they plan to do for the working people of Portland, and if they don't, they aren't worth my vote. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Harold Hutchison lowest because his background as a retired systems engineer does not show experience in local governance, and his public commentary on national issues appears to be out of step with the community-focused and environmentally conscious values that are essential to traditional Portland residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because, as a Republican, he is more likely to support parental control over education and healthcare decisions for children. While specific policies are not yet detailed, his party affiliation generally aligns with protecting parental rights, which is the most important value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he's a Republican, offering a clear alternative to the current direction of the state. His background as a systems engineer suggests he'd bring a logical, problem-solving approach to Salem, which is exactly what we need to fix the mess with homelessness and crime. We need fresh ideas focused on practical results, not more of the same. This is about common sense and accountability for our tax dollars. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no readily available information on his specific policies or stance regarding climate change or environmental protection in Oregon. Without a clear and proactive climate platform, he does not align with the urgent need for aggressive climate action. (0 votes)

State Senate District 16

#1
Rachel Armitage

Reason I rank this candidate high because her platform directly addresses affordable housing, which is critical for our community that has faced so much displacement and gentrification. She has already shown she can get results by securing over $2 million for infrastructure in the North Coast, proving she understands how to make government work for people who need housing. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because her policy positions directly address the critical issues facing working families and vulnerable communities, which is paramount for a progressive society. She champions affordable housing, healthcare access, and quality education, which are fundamental rights and key to reducing inequality in our state. Her previous experience as a State Senator and her endorsement by the United Food and Commercial Workers Local 555 show a clear commitment to labor rights and economic justice. (6 votes)

Reason I rank Rachel Armitage lowest because as a former Democratic State Senator, her platform aligns with the liberal policies that have caused many of Oregon's problems. Her focus on 'affordable housing and health care' typically translates to more government programs and higher taxes, which hurts our economy and limits individual choice. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while she focuses on important issues like 'affordable housing and health care, family-wage jobs, and good schools,' her platform does not clearly address the critical moral and religious concerns that deeply affect our community. Her identity as a 'moderate Democrat' suggests a willingness to compromise on issues that we consider non-negotiable, offering no strong stance against the pervasive secular agenda. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her proven commitment to vital social programs and equitable access. As a former State Senator, she secured over $2 million for critical infrastructure and prioritizes affordable housing, healthcare, and quality schools, directly supporting the well-being of all citizens which is a core humanist value. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform emphasizes securing funding for infrastructure projects and prioritizing affordable housing, healthcare, and schools. While these are important areas, her focus on expanding government services and securing funding suggests a likely continuation or increase in tax revenue, which is contrary to my primary concern of reducing the tax burden on residents. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Democrat in Oregon, her party typically supports stricter gun control measures. There is no public record of her taking a stance to protect gun rights, which is concerning for gun owners who value the Second Amendment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her focus on economic development and job creation for working families, and supporting small businesses, can lead to a healthier local economy. While not directly focused on the stock market, a strong economy generally helps investment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Rachel Armitage low because as a Democrat, her platform focuses on expanding government programs and spending on things like 'affordable housing' and 'healthcare' which often lead to higher taxes and more government control. We need less interference from Salem, not more. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her commitment to affordable housing and accessible healthcare directly addresses the crushing cost of living here in Portland. It's about ensuring everyone can actually live in the city they work in, which is crucial for our community's future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because while her focus on affordable housing and quality schools is important, her platform does not explicitly address issues critical to my community, such as religious freedom or strong support for Israel. These are fundamental values that need clear representation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because they prioritize access to affordable healthcare and aim to attract more healthcare workers, which directly addresses critical needs for many Oregonians, especially in rural areas. Ensuring a strong healthcare workforce and affordable options are key to widespread access. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Rachel Armitage highest because her platform directly supports affordable housing and family-wage jobs, which is crucial for service workers in Portland. She has a history of delivering on infrastructure projects and is endorsed by a major union, showing she truly cares about people like me getting ahead. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their platform lacks a clear focus on tough-on-crime policies. Her public statements emphasize education, housing, and economic development, which, while important, do not directly address the urgent need for stricter enforcement and immediate crime reduction that Portland needs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because as a Democrat, she aligns with a party that has supported policies pushing back against federal immigration efforts in Oregon. Protecting our state from federal overreach on immigration is important, but these policies generally hinder enforcement and prioritize illegal immigrants over our citizens. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she has opposed shifting a controversial gas and transportation tax referendum, which aligns with reducing tax burdens on citizens. She also stated she wants to evaluate existing programs to see 'what works' instead of just creating new ones, suggesting a focus on efficiency that could help control costs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform, while mentioning 'quality schools' and 'rural families,' does not specifically address or prioritize parental control in education. Without a clear stance on this crucial issue, it creates uncertainty about her commitment to protecting parental authority over their children's schooling and values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while she focuses on economic development and job creation, her priorities also include affordable housing and healthcare. These are critical issues, but often lead to increased government spending and potential tax increases that could impact the financial stability and investment returns of high-income residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Democrat in Oregon, her platform focuses on affordable housing and healthcare without clear statements on the sanctity of life or religious freedom. Given Oregon's strong support for abortion rights, her party affiliation likely means she does not uphold the crucial Catholic value of protecting the unborn, which is a foundational moral issue. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because her platform explicitly prioritizes state-funded initiatives like affordable housing, healthcare, and schools, along with securing millions for infrastructure projects. These policies demonstrate a clear preference for government expansion and increased spending, directly conflicting with the Libertarian goal of limiting government size and influence. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Rachel Armitage first because she has already shown she fights for affordable housing and healthcare, which are big problems for our families in Portland. She also has the support of a major union, the United Food and Commercial Workers Local 555, which means she stands with working people. This is crucial for ensuring everyone has a fair shot, especially when housing costs are out of control. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her past work as a State Senator shows she can deliver real results for communities, especially in terms of economic development. She secured over $2 million for critical infrastructure, which directly supports growth and jobs in our region. This experience in getting things done for small businesses and improving schools is valuable for our community's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her focus on affordable housing and quality healthcare directly helps people right now, which is super important. Her past work secured millions for infrastructure, showing she can actually get stuff done that benefits communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her Democratic party affiliation suggests support for gender rights, including reproductive freedom and LGBTQ+ equality. The Democratic Party platform generally aligns with the importance of bodily autonomy and equal rights for all genders. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her strong history of advocating for affordable housing and accessible healthcare aligns with the critical value of community well-being in Portland, ensuring everyone has basic necessities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her consistent focus on accessible housing, healthcare, and quality education is fundamental to building a just and equitable society in Portland. Her previous work securing over $2 million for critical infrastructure demonstrates a commitment to practical solutions that directly benefit working families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Rachel Armitage in the middle because she has prior experience as a State Senator and prioritizes affordable housing and economic development. Her understanding of the unique housing issues in coastal communities, like the need for more workforce housing, shows a practical approach to a problem that affects many working families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Rachel Armitage highest because her commitment to affordable housing and healthcare directly addresses the financial struggles students and vulnerable communities face in Portland, showing she values equitable access to basic necessities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she has a clear plan to help people like me with affordable housing, healthcare, and good jobs. These are things we need to survive and get ahead. She has also helped get money for important projects in the area before, which shows she can actually get things done for us. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because while she talks about supporting rural families and getting money for infrastructure, which is good, her platform focuses a lot on things like affordable housing and health care, which feel more like city concerns. We need someone who prioritizes our specific rural struggles, not just general state issues. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her past work secured $2 million for crucial infrastructure projects in the North Coast. This demonstrates a practical ability to bring tangible benefits to our communities, which is important for supporting local development and improving daily life for residents. While a Democrat, her focus on results over ideology is appreciated. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her commitment to affordable housing, healthcare, and quality schools directly addresses critical needs for working families, reflecting our core progressive value of social equity. She has a proven history of securing funding for essential infrastructure, demonstrating her ability to deliver tangible results for our communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her Democratic party affiliation and focus on policies like affordable housing and healthcare do not align with our core values of limited government and spiritual self-reliance. While she aims for 'affordable housing and health care, family-wage jobs, good schools,' these priorities often come with policies that conflict with our principles. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong commitment to affordable housing, healthcare access, and quality education. Her history of securing over $2 million for critical infrastructure demonstrates she can deliver tangible results, which is vital for improving the lives of working families in our city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Rachel Armitage highest because she has a proven record fighting for affordable housing, a critical issue for seniors and low-income residents in our community, which upholds the vital value of economic security for all Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their policy to prioritize affordable housing, healthcare, and quality schools, which directly benefits the community through secular, evidence-based programs, supporting the importance of human well-being and social equity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her history shows she gets money for important things like local infrastructure, bringing over $2 million to the North Coast, which means real jobs for working people. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because while she is a Democrat, her focus on economic development, job creation, and securing funding for critical infrastructure in rural communities is a practical approach. She's worked to get over $2 million for projects in the North Coast, showing she can get results for local needs. This practical focus on tangible improvements is a strength, especially for areas outside of Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her commitment to a "timber accord" that aims to bring environmentalists and timber companies together to find a sustainable path forward for Oregon's forests. This approach seeks a crucial balance that respects both ecological preservation and the livelihoods of rural communities, aligning with a just transition. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their focus on extreme environmental regulations could mean higher costs for families and businesses. Things like pushing alternative energy too fast or limiting cars might hit our wallets hard and make everyday life more difficult. Fiscal common sense and economic practicality are essential for our community to prosper. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because her platform, while focusing on affordable housing, healthcare, and schools, lacks a strong emphasis on traditional family values or moral order. Her pragmatic approach and willingness to compromise, while good for some, do not strongly resonate with the need to uphold fundamental spiritual and cultural principles that guide our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her focus on increasing access to affordable housing and healthcare directly addresses critical issues facing people in our communities, showing a commitment to social welfare that is essential for a truly equitable Oregon. (0 votes)
#2
Aaron Dickie

Reason I rank this candidate high because his background as a nurse and his extensive volunteer work directly demonstrates a commitment to compassion and practical human welfare. These actions align with the humanist value of actively improving the lives of others, especially the vulnerable, through direct service and care. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, as a Democrat, he aligns with the party's general principles, and his background in nursing and extensive volunteer work for organizations like Habitat for Humanity demonstrates a commitment to community well-being. While he lacks a detailed progressive policy platform in the available information, his actions suggest a foundation supportive of helping those in need, which is important for our community. (5 votes)

Reason I rank Aaron Dickie high because his background as a nurse shows a direct commitment to public health and caring for the community, which is a vital value for ensuring everyone's well-being. (2 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because I don't see a lot about his specific plans for people struggling financially. He's a nurse and a veteran, which shows he cares about helping people, but I need to know more about how he'd help with housing, jobs, and the high cost of living. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough detailed information about his specific policy stances on issues that are critical to my community, such as religious freedom, parental rights, or support for Israel. Without a clear platform, it is difficult to determine his alignment with my values. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform lacks specific details on how he plans to address key issues like taxes, public safety, or local business support. While his background as a nurse and veteran, and his volunteer work, show a commitment to service, I need clear plans for our community's future. A clear vision for Oregon is vital. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he has a good background as a nurse and a veteran, there isn't much information publicly available about his specific plans for our State Senate district. It's hard to know how he would address the everyday concerns of Portland residents without a clear platform on issues like the economy, safety, or housing. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough public information available about their specific economic policies or stances to determine how they might impact the stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest as no specific information regarding their stance on taxes or fiscal policy was found. As a Democrat, without any stated commitment to tax reduction or fiscal conservatism, there is a risk that their policies could lead to maintaining or increasing taxes to fund various government programs, which does not align with my single-issue focus on lowering taxes. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because there is insufficient information about his specific stances on moral and social issues critical to our faith, and his Democratic party affiliation signals a general misalignment with our values. His campaign information primarily highlights his professional and military background without clear policy positions that would reassure voters of his commitment to our principles. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his party affiliation, Democrat, indicates a policy to uphold Oregon's robust abortion access. This protects the essential value of reproductive freedom for all residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Democrat, his party generally supports more gun restrictions in Oregon. There is no information available to suggest he would actively defend the Second Amendment, which is the most important issue for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find information about his specific policies or stances on inflation, taxes, or government spending. As a single-issue inflation voter, I need to see a clear plan to address rising costs to support a candidate. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his Democratic party affiliation indicates a general alignment with policies that protect gender rights. The Democratic Party typically supports access to reproductive healthcare and LGBTQ+ equality, which are crucial values for gender equity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no information available regarding his stance on parental control in education. This lack of clarity on such a vital issue is concerning, as parents need to know candidates will actively support their rights to guide their children's upbringing and education. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Democrat in Oregon, it is likely he supports the party's general stance on immigration. The Democratic party in Oregon has favored policies that protect immigrants, which goes against my priority of strict immigration enforcement and protecting our community's legal residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because as a Democrat, he likely supports an expansion of government programs and services, which increases state spending and intervention in individual lives. There's no specific policy information available that suggests a commitment to reducing government size or promoting individual economic freedom. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Aaron Dickie last because, while his background as a nurse and small business owner is respectable, there isn't enough public information about his specific policy plans to address the high cost of living or other pressing issues for families like mine. I need to know how a candidate will directly help my financial situation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough specific policy information available to determine how he would address key economic and fiscal concerns. Without a clear platform on taxes, business regulation, or public spending, it is difficult to assess his potential impact on the financial interests of high-income residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his professional background as a nurse and his extensive volunteer work show a clear dedication to community well-being and caring for vulnerable populations. This reflects essential progressive values of compassion and social support, even if his specific policy stances are not yet widely detailed. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Aaron Dickie low because he is running as a Democrat, which means he likely supports policies that go against our core values of limited government and individual freedom. While he is a veteran, his party affiliation suggests he would push for more government spending and regulation, rather than cutting taxes and reigning in state power. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while his background as a veteran and nurse is respectable, he doesn't clearly state his position on the issues that matter most to us in rural Oregon. We need a candidate with specific plans to protect our property rights, gun rights, and support our natural resource industries, not just general community involvement. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate as medium because, as a Democrat, he is generally expected to support environmental policies, aligning with the party's platform that often prioritizes climate action. However, his campaign information does not explicitly detail specific climate change policies, which makes it hard to fully assess his commitment to the urgent action needed. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his affiliation with the Masonic Lodge is a grave concern. From an Islamic perspective, Freemasonry is seen as a secret society whose goals are to undermine religion and promote man-made laws that conflict with divine guidance. Such an affiliation raises serious questions about his loyalty to religious principles and makes him unsuitable to represent our community's values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough information available about his specific policy positions or how he plans to address the economic and educational challenges facing our district. While his background as a nurse and veteran is commendable, a clear platform on issues like jobs, taxes, and community development is essential for me to understand how he would represent our interests effectively. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his background as a nurse and veteran suggests a commitment to public service and community well-being, which is a good starting point. While his specific policy plans aren't super clear yet, his healthcare experience implies a valuable perspective for improving access and equity in our state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because his background as a nurse and his extensive volunteer work show a clear commitment to serving the community, which is an important value for ensuring a strong social safety net for all residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Aaron Dickie in the middle because, as a nurse and small business owner, he likely understands the struggles of working people, but his platform is not very clear on specific policies that would help service workers directly. We need strong advocates, not just good intentions. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no information available on his stance regarding the sanctity of life or religious freedom, which are critical Catholic values. As a Democratic candidate in Oregon, where there is broad support for abortion rights, it is highly probable his views would not align with the protection of the unborn, failing to prioritize the most essential moral principles. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because as a Democrat, he aligns with the values that keep Portland moving forward. While his specific plans aren't as clear, his background as a nurse and small business owner suggests a practical, community-minded approach, which is always good. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, as a nurse, they likely have a direct understanding of healthcare needs, which is valuable. However, without a specific public platform on expanding healthcare access or affordability, it is difficult to confidently rank them higher. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because, as a Democrat, he is aligned with the party's overall goals, which is a necessary starting point. His background as a nurse and a veteran suggests a commitment to public service and community well-being, values that are important to me. While his specific policy details aren't as clear as others, his profession as a nurse implies an understanding of the healthcare system and the need for accessible care. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his background as a nurse, small business owner, and Air Force veteran shows a strong work ethic and commitment to service, there is not enough specific policy information available to clearly assess how he plans to address key economic or public safety concerns. A candidate's concrete plans are essential for voters to make informed decisions for our community's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Aaron Dickie last because there is almost no information available about his policies or what he stands for, beyond being a Democrat. Without a clear platform, I cannot trust him to represent the values important to our community, especially given the current political climate in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, as a Democrat, he likely aligns with general progressive values, but his specific policy stances on critical urban issues like environmental protection or social justice are not clearly articulated in public information. While his background as a nurse and veteran is commendable, I need concrete proposals to enthusiastically support his candidacy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Aaron Dickie high because his background as a nurse and veteran demonstrates a clear commitment to public service, which aligns with the core value of community well-being and supporting those who dedicate themselves to caring for others. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because their background as a nurse and extensive volunteer work aligns with a practical, humanitarian approach to public service, promoting community well-being through secular efforts, which is important for a functioning society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he hasn't clearly shown what he plans to do about making sure there are enough good jobs or making housing affordable for everyone, which are the biggest problems we face. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because, as a Democrat and a nurse, he likely values public health, which aligns with Green Party principles for community well-being. However, his campaign information lacks specific policy proposals on environmental protection or systemic social justice reforms, making it difficult to fully assess his commitment to our core values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear plan to make our neighborhoods safe again. They want to put more police on the streets and crack down on crime, which is crucial for protecting our families and keeping property values up. The safety of our community is the most important thing, and a strong police presence makes us all feel secure. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough clear information on his specific policies or stances that align with traditional values or moral principles. While his background in community service is good, it doesn't provide the strong, explicit commitment to the values I seek to protect our way of life. (0 votes)

Reason I place Aaron Dickie second because as a nurse, he understands the real struggles people face with healthcare. It's important to have someone who has seen these issues firsthand fighting for better care for everyone. (0 votes)
#3
Jordan Gutierrez

Reason I rank this candidate worst because their stated opposition to elevating 'sexual orientation' and 'gender identity' to protected classes, despite being a Democrat, directly undermines the crucial secular value of equality and human rights for all individuals, regardless of identity. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite identifying as a Democrat, his 'A grade from the NRA' and comments on gender identity directly contradict core progressive values that are vital for protecting marginalized communities and promoting inclusivity in Oregon. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because, despite being a Democrat, his stances are fundamentally opposed to core progressive values. His "A grade" from the NRA, his opposition to taxpayer-funded abortion, and his dismissive comments on gender identity reveal a deep misalignment with our fight for social justice, equity, and bodily autonomy. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because his opposition to elevating sexual orientation and gender identity to protected classes directly undermines the humanist value of equality and human dignity for all individuals. This stance actively works against creating a fully inclusive and accepting society in Oregon. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their concrete policy proposals for affordable and accessible housing, such as converting vacant commercial spaces into homes and subdividing residential lots for smaller, cheaper units. This directly addresses the housing crisis in a way that promotes sustainable communities and social equity, which is vital for our city and state. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his main talk is about problems with computers and voting, which doesn't do anything to help working people with the high cost of living or finding steady work. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite being a Democrat, his publicly stated positions do not prioritize climate change. His strong endorsement from the NRA suggests a focus on issues that often diverge from environmental protection, which is my most important value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate as medium because, even though he is a Democrat, he is the only one in Oregon to receive an 'A' grade from the NRA. This shows a commitment to protecting gun rights that is rare for his party and suggests he understands the importance of the Second Amendment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his support for 'reproductive freedom' goes against the sacred value of life, which is paramount to our beliefs. He stated, 'I believe in reproductive freedom and support an individual's choice in how that liberty is exercised,' which I cannot support. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because their public statements are focused on tax policies and accessible housing, with no mention of crime or public safety. Addressing crime is the most important issue, and a candidate who does not prioritize it fails to address the core problem facing our city. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because his idea to bring federal tax money back to Oregon sounds like it could really help my paycheck and lower costs for businesses, which means lower prices for me. It's important to keep more of our hard-earned money in our community without raising our state taxes. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because he explicitly opposes elevating "gender identity" and "sexual orientation" to protected classes, and supports "Parental Rights in Gender Identity Counseling". These positions actively deny basic human rights and protections for LGBTQ+ individuals, which are crucial aspects of gender rights. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his primary focus is on housing solutions, like converting commercial spaces and building small homes, and fiscal responsibility regarding Medicaid. These policies are important for social welfare but do not directly address broad economic growth or tax benefits that influence stock market performance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Jordan Gutierrez in the middle. Even though he's a Democrat, he stands out for his strong support of Second Amendment rights and his focus on bringing our tax dollars back to Oregon without raising state taxes. I also appreciate his common-sense stance against absurd progressive social ideas, which shows he might listen to real people. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their explicit policy supporting universal health care for all Oregonians, which is the most important value for ensuring everyone has access to medical services. This candidate also wants to remove limits on medical expense deductions, which would directly make healthcare more affordable for many families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Democrat, he likely supports policies that prioritize immigrants without distinguishing between legal and illegal status, similar to others in his party. This goes against my core belief that strict immigration enforcement is most important for our state's stability and the well-being of its legal residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Jordan Gutierrez low because his main policy proposal about bringing federal dollars back to Oregon sounds promising for the state's economy and could indirectly help families. However, his significant focus on theoretical election security issues seems less immediately relevant to my everyday struggles with the cost of living and making ends meet. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his main focus on a complex federal tax plan and concerns about AI with voter signatures doesn't address the urgent, everyday issues affecting rural Oregonians. We need someone who understands our local needs regarding land use, resource management, and state overreach, not abstract federal tax schemes or niche election integrity theories. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his support for reproductive freedom and converting commercial spaces into affordable housing is good, but his 'tough stance' on drug policy reform and 'A grade' from the NRA are huge red flags. It feels like he's trying to appeal to everyone and ends up contradicting what really matters for progressive change, especially when it comes to social justice and public safety. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his background as a tax professional is strong and his ideas on affordable housing are good, his unique focus on potential AI threats to elections is less relevant to my immediate concerns about economic growth and community support. His proposal to convert commercial spaces and subdivide lots to create small, affordable homes is a practical approach to a pressing issue, which is a positive. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because, while a Democrat, his focus on the 'Bring Our Oregonian Dollars Home Act' to lower business costs and boost paychecks without raising state taxes shows a unique fiscal awareness. This policy, if effective, could empower individuals by increasing their disposable income and reducing the overall tax burden, which aligns with fiscal responsibility. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I cannot support someone who makes baseless claims about AI manipulation of ballot signatures, as it undermines the fundamental integrity of our democratic process and trust in elections, which is essential for our society to function. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jordan Gutierrez high because he proposes smart ways to tackle the housing crisis, like turning empty commercial buildings into homes and making it easier to build small, affordable starter homes. This directly helps service workers find a place to live in our expensive city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because, while a Democrat, his primary focus on the 'Bring Our Oregonian Dollars Home Act' and concerns about voting security do not directly address the urgent social and environmental justice issues that are paramount for Portland residents. His unique focus on election integrity, while important, doesn't align as strongly with a comprehensive progressive agenda as other candidates. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he mentions how diverting Medicaid funds for housing development doesn't help lower healthcare costs, his primary public focus seems to be on election integrity. He also proposes a state bond program for housing, but without clear details on how this would avoid adding to overall financial burdens. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, despite being a Democrat, he supports prohibiting abortion after a heartbeat is detected and opposes taxpayer funding for abortion, which upholds the sanctity of life. Furthermore, he opposes physician-assisted suicide and supports parental rights in gender identity counseling, aligning with critical Catholic teachings on life and family, demonstrating a commitment to moral principles over party lines. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low. While their background as a tax consultant suggests a deep understanding of tax systems, their campaign platform does not explicitly focus on reducing taxes or limiting government spending. As a Democrat, their policy approach might involve funding various programs that could lead to maintaining or increasing the overall tax burden, which is a concern for a single-issue taxes voter. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jordan Gutierrez very low because he is a Democrat, and his focus on concerns about AI's potential impact on election signatures seems to distract from the real issues facing Oregonians. We need leaders focused on practical solutions for crime and the economy, not raising alarms about hypothetical election vulnerabilities that shift focus away from holding those in power accountable. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jordan Gutierrez low because his main focus on a tax plan to "Bring Our Oregonian Dollars Home" doesn't prioritize urgent progressive social issues like climate action or tenant protections, and his AI election claims are a bizarre distraction. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his primary focus on potential AI threats to election integrity, while unique, does not address the pressing issues of religious freedom, community safety, or support for Israel that are vital to my community. My vote prioritizes candidates who champion our core values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because I appreciate his bold approach to fixing our housing crisis by looking at converting empty commercial spaces into homes and building smaller, affordable units. We need creative solutions like these to keep Portland livable, especially when rents are so out of control. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate third because, while he is a Democrat, his primary focus on a specific, somewhat speculative issue about AI and ballot signatures, which state election officials have largely disagreed with, seems to distract from more pressing progressive concerns like climate change, social equity, or economic reform. While election integrity is important, this particular approach might not be the most effective way to address the systemic challenges our state faces. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because his focus on general economic plans like the 'Bring Our Oregonian Dollars Home Act' doesn't directly address the deep racial wealth gap or fight against gentrification that has pushed our people out of their homes. While economic stability is good, his priorities seem too far removed from the specific and urgent racial justice issues we face. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his "Bring Our Oregonian Dollars Home Act" aims to reclaim billions from federal taxes and lower business costs without raising state taxes. This focus on smart financial strategies to boost our economy and people's paychecks is a strong move towards fiscal efficiency and prosperity, which is very important for our community's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because of his innovative policy ideas for affordable housing, like supporting the subdivision of residential lots for small starter homes and converting vacant commercial spaces. This focus on practical solutions to our housing crisis is crucial for urban residents and shows a commitment to progressive change. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jordan Gutierrez here because his "Bring Our Oregonian Dollars Home Act" aims to redirect federal tax money back to our state, which could help fund essential public services and support our local economy without raising state taxes, reflecting a commitment to local investment and financial equity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his main focus seems to be on a very specific concern about artificial intelligence and election signatures, which is not a top priority for most people in our district. While it's good to be aware of new technologies, I'm more worried about bigger issues like the rising cost of living and making our neighborhoods safer, and his platform doesn't clearly address those things that affect us every day. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform does not provide any information on his position regarding parental control in education. For me, the protection of parental rights is the most important issue, and a candidate's silence on this matter suggests they may not prioritize the vital role parents play in their children's lives. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because while they talk about making housing more affordable, I worry their plans might lead to more high-density housing that changes the character of our suburbs and increases traffic. Protecting the peaceful, spacious feel of our neighborhoods is really important, and we need to be careful about how we grow. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his primary focus on potential mail-in voting tampering, while a concern for some, does not address the fundamental moral and cultural issues that are most important. His platform lacks a clear dedication to upholding traditional values, family, or spiritual principles, which are essential for the well-being of our community. (0 votes)

Reason I put Jordan Gutierrez in the middle because he is from Portland and a Democrat, which is a good start. However, his main focus on what he calls "AI-driven election chaos" feels less urgent than problems like finding a place to live or getting healthcare that affects our daily lives. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his party affiliation, Democrat, signals a policy to safeguard existing abortion access in Oregon. This ensures the vital value of reproductive health equity for everyone. (0 votes)
#4
Courtney Bangs

Reason I rank this candidate low because her endorsement by Oregon Right to Life PAC shows her policy would be to limit abortion access. This harms the fundamental value of bodily autonomy and reproductive freedom for Oregonians. (3 votes)

Reason I rank Courtney Bangs low because her opposition to environmental conservation plans and her advocacy for "parents' rights" in education directly undermine crucial efforts to protect our planet and promote inclusive, equitable learning environments. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she is a devoted mother and educator who explicitly prioritizes 'Parents' Rights in Education' and has fought against bills related to 'gender-affirming care,' which aligns with our core values of protecting our children's innocence and upholding traditional family structures. Her faith also guides her actions, which is essential for true leadership that serves a higher purpose. Her commitment to our way of life against outside influences shows strength. (5 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she actively opposed a costly $4.3 billion transportation tax hike, which shows a direct commitment to keeping money in the pockets of Oregonians. She also wants to cut red tape on housing, which could help lower housing costs, a big part of inflation. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her Republican platform directly conflicts with my core values. Her emphasis on 'defending working forests & natural resource jobs' often implies a preference for resource extraction over strict environmental protection, which is crucial for addressing climate change. Additionally, her support for 'parental rights in education' often serves as a dog whistle for opposing inclusive curricula and LGBTQ+ rights, which undermines social justice and equality in our schools. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her strong opposition to the state’s habitat conservation plan significantly conflicts with the humanist value of environmental stewardship. Prioritizing short-term timber revenues over long-term ecological protection shows a disregard for the interconnectedness of human well-being and a healthy planet. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because of their clear stance against tax increases and their focus on fiscal accountability. They actively opposed a costly gas tax and advocated for allowing voters to decide on the measure. This demonstrates a commitment to preventing unnecessary tax burdens and ensuring transparency in government spending, which is important for protecting taxpayers. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because her strong stance against abortion and her advocacy for parental rights in education, which often means limiting inclusive curricula, completely clash with the core values of bodily autonomy and equitable education. Plus, opposing the gas tax and backing law enforcement just doesn't align with investing in sustainable futures and addressing systemic issues. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she wants to cut red tape on housing and opposes new gas taxes. These actions can help reduce business costs and improve consumer spending, which indirectly supports the stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Courtney Bangs low because her opposition to the state's habitat conservation plan shows a disregard for protecting our natural environment, which is a crucial value for the long-term health of our state and the well-being of future generations. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their endorsement by Oregon Right to Life PAC and stated defense of parents' rights 'from the abortion industry' shows a clear intent to legislate based on religious dogma rather than secular personal freedom and bodily autonomy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their history of backing law enforcement. As a County Commissioner, they "backed law enforcement," showing a practical commitment to public safety. This direct support for police is a vital step toward reducing crime in our communities. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Courtney Bangs high because she has a proven record as a Clatsop County Commissioner of fighting state overreach, demanding accountability for tax dollars, and protecting our rural way of life. Her opposition to the costly gas tax and her strong support for parental rights are exactly what we need. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she has actively demonstrated her commitment to defending the Second Amendment. She was endorsed by Senator Suzanne Weber specifically for her stance on gun rights and participated in a legislative walkout to stop gun control bills, showing she will fight to protect our rights. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she supports backing law enforcement and has actively opposed "far-left Portland Democrat politicians." This commitment to law and order is crucial for controlling illegal immigration, which helps protect our community's safety and resources, a value I prioritize above all else. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low-medium because she talks about cutting red tape for housing and supporting rural infrastructure, which could help in some ways. But her main focus seems to be on forests and fighting a gas tax, which isn't as much about directly helping me with my day-to-day struggles to pay rent and buy food. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Courtney Bangs high because her experience as a County Commissioner shows she understands how to make government more efficient and accountable, which saves taxpayer money. Her commitment to cutting red tape to reduce housing costs is a practical step that could really help bring down living expenses for families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while they acknowledge rural healthcare inequities and want to expand pediatric mental health, their strong anti-abortion stance and opposition to gender-affirming care are significant barriers to comprehensive healthcare access for all. Healthcare must include reproductive and gender-affirming care. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she understands the challenges we face out here, being from a family farm herself. She's pledged to protect our working forests and fight for better rural roads, which are vital for our livelihoods and connecting our communities. She also stands up for our Second Amendment rights and against high taxes. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her focus on demanding accountability for tax dollars and cutting red tape to reduce housing costs is a step in the right direction for fiscal prudence. Her support for natural resource jobs also contributes to a stable state economy, which indirectly benefits all residents, including high-income earners. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she is endorsed by Oregon Right to Life PAC, showing her dedication to protecting the unborn. This commitment to life is fundamental, and her willingness to stand for parental rights in education further supports the Catholic teaching on family values, ensuring our children are raised with strong moral guidance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her participation in a legislative walkout to obstruct bills on abortion, gun control, and gender-affirming care directly opposes crucial progressive values like reproductive freedom, sensible gun safety, and LGBTQ+ rights. Her actions show a willingness to halt government function rather than compromise on these vital social issues. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she has good experience as a Clatsop County Commissioner, which means she knows about local issues up close. She has worked to cut red tape to help make housing more affordable, and that's a big deal for families and older residents who are struggling with the high cost of living. Supporting efforts to lower housing costs is a practical way to improve life for many of us. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her focus on fiscal responsibility and cutting red tape, especially regarding housing, which impacts many families. As a County Commissioner, she has a history of fighting for rural infrastructure and backing law enforcement, showing a commitment to practical solutions that benefit the community. Her opposition to a large transportation tax hike also shows she understands the burden of taxes on working families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because she supports fiscal accountability and reduced regulation. Bangs advocates for demanding accountability for tax dollars and cutting red tape to lower housing costs, which is a step towards more responsible government and less intervention in the market, benefiting individuals. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because she is endorsed by the Oregon Right to Life PAC and advocates for "Protecting Our Values: Life, 2A, & Parents' Rights in Education". This policy directly threatens reproductive freedom and gender-affirming care, which are essential for gender equality. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her opposition to a gas tax hike and her stance on prioritizing "working forests" show a clear disregard for addressing climate change and environmental preservation, which are essential for our planet's future and directly affect the health of our communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Courtney Bangs low because her focus on 'traditional Oregon values' and 'cutting red tape' often means less protection for workers and the environment, which is bad for Portland service workers. Her support from a senator who walked out on important votes is also a problem. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her opposition to the state's habitat conservation plan and her participation in a legislative walkout to stall bills on abortion, gun control, and gender-affirming care directly conflict with the core environmental and social justice values crucial to a Portland resident. These actions actively undermine efforts to protect both the planet and marginalized communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Courtney Bangs highly because her history as a Clatsop County Commissioner shows she champions local control and challenges state overreach. She has consistently fought for fiscal responsibility and protecting rural jobs, which is essential for ensuring our communities are not dictated by Portland's liberal agenda and taxpayers' money is used wisely. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her focus on "rural ways of life" and opposing a gas tax feels completely out of touch with what Portland needs. We need to invest in public transit and sustainable options, not cling to car-centric policies that just make traffic and pollution worse in our city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Republican from Clatsop County, her platform, which often aligns with general Republican stances, does not show a clear understanding or commitment to fighting systemic racism or addressing the intense housing inequalities faced by our community in Portland. Her party's general opposition to what they call 'Portland's agenda' worries me, as it often means cutting programs that could help us. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she actively opposed the $4.3 billion transportation tax hike and advocated for voters to have a say. This shows a commitment to fiscal responsibility and protecting taxpayers from excessive burdens, which is crucial for family budgets and local businesses. She also strongly supports parental rights in education. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because she champions parental rights, especially regarding the protection of children from harmful influences like the abortion industry. Senator Suzanne Weber affirmed her commitment, saying Bangs 'will always choose to protect us and not her political career' when it comes to defending the right of parents to protect their minor children from the abortion industry. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform prioritizes 'Protecting Our Values: Life, 2A, & Parents' Rights in Education,' which directly contradicts my core values for abortion rights, strict gun control, and inclusive public education. Her alignment with politicians who stalled progressive legislation further signals a move away from the urban agenda. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she wants to cut down on all the rules that make housing so expensive, which helps working families find an affordable place to live. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because her experience as a Clatsop County Commissioner shows she understands local issues and how to manage taxpayer money wisely. She advocates for defending natural resource jobs and demanding accountability for our tax dollars, which helps ensure our communities get the resources they need without waste. Practical, common-sense governance is very important. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her stance on "protecting working forests" typically prioritizes commercial logging interests over ecological preservation, which is damaging to our vital ecosystems. Furthermore, her opposition to transportation taxes and support from groups like Oregon Right to Life directly conflict with our values for sustainable infrastructure and bodily autonomy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because they truly understand what matters for our kids' education. They want to make sure our local schools get the money they need and that parents have a bigger say in what our children learn. Quality education for our children is vital for their future and for the strength of our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highly because she explicitly commits to 'Protecting Our Values' and emphasizes parental rights in education. This shows a deep respect for family authority and the importance of traditional values in raising children, which is essential for a moral society and upholding the integrity of our families. (0 votes)

Reason I place Courtney Bangs near the bottom because she talks about "protecting our values" like the Second Amendment and "parental rights," which often means taking away rights from others. She also opposes plans to protect state forests, which is bad for our environment. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her conservative stances, like being endorsed by Oregon Right to Life PAC and her focus on 'protecting working forests' over broader environmental protections, are out of step with the progressive social and ecological values crucial for Portland's future. (0 votes)
#5
Tripp Dietrich

Reason I rank this candidate last because his entire platform is an open attack on progressive values and the diverse identity of Portland, which is deeply offensive. His promise to be a 'wrench in the gears' against 'Portland's radical left' shows he is not interested in working collaboratively for all Oregonians. His strong stance on unlimited Second Amendment rights and endorsement by Oregon Right to Life PAC are direct threats to common-sense gun safety and reproductive freedom, making him completely unacceptable. (12 votes)

Reason I rank Tripp Dietrich highest because he is a staunch defender of individual liberties and is committed to stopping the radical left's influence in Oregon. He promises to protect our Second Amendment rights and cut wasteful government spending, which is crucial for hardworking Oregonians feeling taxed out of their homes. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because his explicit 'wrench in their gears' rhetoric against 'Portland's far-left radicals' and his strong anti-abortion and pro-gun stance directly threaten the progressive values and social advancements that define our city. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his unwavering commitment to gun rights. He strongly opposes House Bill 4145, which would add more restrictions on gun owners, and aligns with the Oregon Firearms Federation, a leading group that defends the Second Amendment without compromise. This shows he will always fight for our right to keep and bear arms, which is the most important value. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because his strong opposition to 'Portland's radical left' and 'bloated state agencies that serve Portland's agenda' is a direct attack on the very efforts and programs needed to address racial injustice and support our urban communities. His focus on cutting taxes and reducing regulations often means less funding for vital social services and housing initiatives that our people desperately need. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he is a business owner who wants to cut red tape for small businesses and lower taxes. Less regulation and lower taxes mean more money for companies and investors, which is good for the stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he explicitly states, "I will defend the unborn. Life is not negotiable" and is endorsed by Oregon Right to Life PAC. This policy directly undermines reproductive rights and the autonomy of individuals to make decisions about their own bodies. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because he strongly opposes what he calls 'Portland's radical left,' which often includes elements hostile to my community's values and support for Israel. His stance resonates with my desire for leaders who will not compromise on traditional values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform explicitly supports parental rights in education. This shows a direct understanding and commitment to protecting the fundamental right of parents to direct their children's upbringing and schooling, which is the most important value for our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he clearly aims to lower costs for working families by opposing all new taxes and working to reduce the existing tax burden. He also wants to cut government regulations and agencies he sees as bloated, which should reduce overall state spending and make things cheaper. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong commitment to protecting our Second Amendment rights, which is paramount for self-reliant rural folks. He also promises to cut government red tape and reopen our working forests, which helps our local economy and protects our way of life from urban meddling. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Tripp Dietrich highest because he is a staunch conservative who directly challenges the radical left's agenda in Oregon. He promises to protect our Second Amendment rights and fight against new taxes, which is crucial for defending individual liberty and keeping more money in our pockets in a state that taxes us too much. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highly for his clear stance against government overreach and excessive taxation. Dietrich pledges to slash red tape for small businesses, cut bloated state agencies, and oppose all new taxes, which aligns with the Libertarian goal of reducing the financial and regulatory burden on citizens and free enterprise. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he stands firm on the sanctity of life, declaring that 'life is not negotiable'. This unwavering commitment to protecting the unborn is a fundamental value that upholds dharma, which is righteous conduct and moral order. He will safeguard the divine gift of life, which is paramount for our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he advocates for policies that foster a strong business environment and reduce financial obligations. His pledge to oppose every new tax, slash red tape for small businesses, and cut bloated state agencies is vital for economic growth and preserving the prosperity of high-income individuals and their ventures. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite wanting to 'restore rural healthcare,' their platform suggests less government involvement, which could hurt universal access. More importantly, their strong stance that 'life is not negotiable' and defending the unborn is a direct threat to reproductive healthcare access, a critical part of comprehensive care. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong stance against the "radical left" in Portland, which suggests he would support policies that prioritize controlling immigration. Protecting Oregon's original values is most important for our community's security and resources, and his platform implies a commitment to these values over open-border policies. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his commitment to supporting small businesses and reducing taxes, which is vital for our community's prosperity. He promises to cut down on excessive government rules that make it hard for businesses to operate and grow, and he will fight against any new taxes. This approach will create more jobs and help our local economy flourish, which is important for every family trying to build a better life. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong commitment to opposing new taxes and working to lower the existing burden on families and businesses. They explicitly state, 'I will oppose every new tax and work to lower the burden on families and businesses already doing it the hard way.' This dedication to reducing taxes directly benefits all residents by keeping more money in their pockets, which is crucial for economic well-being. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because his openly anti-'Portland's radical left' rhetoric and extreme views on gun rights and abortion are completely out of touch with what our community needs. His desire to 'reopen working forests' also shows a disregard for crucial environmental protection that future generations depend on. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because his rhetoric attacking "Portland's radical left" and his strong opposition to gun control measures fundamentally clash with our community's urgent need for common-sense safety and progressive leadership, which values collective well-being over individual freedoms that endanger others. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Tripp Dietrich last because he openly opposes 'Portland's political changes' and emphasizes 'traditional Oregon values,' which sounds like he would fight against progress for service workers and our diverse city. We need someone who supports our future, not someone stuck in the past. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy against perceived leniency and their support for law enforcement. They clearly state that "Portland's radical left has... defunded our sheriffs" and will fight against policies that "do nothing to address crime while punishing responsible owners." This shows a commitment to empowering police and opposing gun control that doesn't deter criminals, which is critical for public safety. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his explicit anti-'Portland's radical left' stance, strong anti-abortion position endorsed by Oregon Right to Life PAC, and calls to slash environmental protections directly oppose the fundamental progressive, environmental, and social justice values held by Portland residents. He actively campaigns against everything I value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he clearly states his unwavering commitment to protecting the unborn, affirming that 'Life is not negotiable'. This stance aligns perfectly with the paramount Catholic value of the sanctity of human life, which must be defended from conception to natural death for all people. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Tripp Dietrich lower because while I appreciate his desire to cut taxes and reduce government red tape for businesses, his strong anti-Portland stance feels a bit divisive. However, his focus on fast-tracking workforce housing and bringing back vocational training could help people like me find stable jobs and affordable places to live. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Tripp Dietrich last because his platform explicitly targets "Portland's radical left" and champions extreme anti-abortion and gun rights policies, which directly contradict the progressive values and social justice goals that are crucial to our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he mentions fast-tracking workforce housing and restoring rural healthcare, his main message is about cutting government and opposing taxes. This often means less support for programs that help people like me who are really struggling. I need help, not just less government. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his entire campaign seems to be about fighting against Portland's progressive values and "far-left radicals." That kind of divisive rhetoric does nothing to solve the real problems we face here; it just creates more division and blocks progress. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he clearly states he will "slash the red tape strangling our small businesses and cut the bloated state agencies." This policy helps our local economy by making it easier for businesses to grow and create jobs, which is vital for the financial well-being of families and the community. He also strongly opposes new taxes, which aligns with my desire for financial prudence. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign explicitly targets "Portland's radical left" and seeks to dismantle environmental protections, showing a direct opposition to progressive leadership and our efforts to address climate change. His strong anti-regulation stance would harm workers and the environment, which are key progressive concerns. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because his platform is explicitly anti-'Portland's radical left' and seeks to cut 'bloated state agencies that serve Portland's agenda.' His desire to protect Second Amendment rights and fight EPA overreach directly opposes my values for strict gun control and strong environmental protection, making him entirely unsuitable for my representation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Tripp Dietrich last because his platform explicitly targets "Portland's radical left" and aims to cut state agencies, directly threatening the progressive values and social programs that protect our most vulnerable and ensure a healthy environment for all. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their explicit policy to 'defend the unborn' and endorsement by Oregon Right to Life PAC indicates a clear intent to impose religious-based restrictions on reproductive rights, which directly opposes the fundamental secular value of individual bodily autonomy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he strongly commits to defending 'the unborn' as 'life is not negotiable,' which is a fundamental moral value for our community. He also stands against 'Portland's radical left' and their policies, signaling a desire to protect traditional values from secular extremism. His focus on economic common sense and support for small businesses also benefits our families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he wants to cut down on government regulations and fight against new taxes, which could help our small businesses and make things more affordable. He also wants to re-open our forests for work, which can bring jobs to parts of our district. It's important to keep our economy strong and support local industries. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he pushes for bringing back vocational training to our schools, which is exactly what we need to get young people ready for good-paying jobs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highly because he stands up against policies he sees as harming Oregon and focuses on supporting local businesses. He promises to cut red tape for small businesses and reduce the size of state agencies, which I believe will help our economy grow. This commitment to economic freedom and less government interference is a core value for a thriving community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his platform openly attacks "Portland's far-left radicals" and advocates for "reopening Oregon's working forests" by fighting "EPA overreach," which is a clear assault on environmental regulations and progressive values. His business background, coupled with a desire to slash regulations and taxes, would actively dismantle protections for our planet and people. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because they focus on fixing our crumbling roads and attracting good jobs to the area. Better infrastructure makes our commutes easier and supports our local economy, which helps everyone. Economic stability is important for our families to thrive and for our area to grow responsibly. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Tripp Dietrich last. His strong words against "Portland's radical left" and his opposition to things like gun control and abortion rights show he is completely against what our community in Portland believes in. He also wants to reduce environmental protections. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign's rhetoric against 'Portland's far-left radicals' suggests he would push policies to restrict abortion access. This directly threatens the crucial value of reproductive choice for individuals. (0 votes)
#6
Frank Mansfield

Reason I rank this candidate worst because his comments about opposing 'free handouts' to 'illegals and homeless without anything in return' are deeply insulting and directly against the core value of supporting vulnerable communities, especially those of us who have been historically marginalized. His stance on 'removing bias from classrooms' also suggests he would oppose teaching the true history of racial injustice and its ongoing impact. (10 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their clear and comprehensive policy to reduce the tax burden on Oregonians. They propose enshrining 'no sales taxes' into the state constitution, canceling the tax on gross sales, and reforming property taxes to stop annual 3% increases and prevent 'tax punishment' for improvements. These actions would directly alleviate the financial strain on families and businesses, which is the most important value for me. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his policy is to restrict abortion to only rape, incest, or to save the mother's life. This severely limits the fundamental right to choose, impacting many individuals in Oregon. (2 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear stance on prioritizing parental rights in education, emphasizing core subjects and removing bias from classrooms. This policy directly empowers parents to guide their children's learning and ensures schools focus on essential education, which is paramount for our families. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Frank Mansfield highest because his strong stance on fiscal responsibility directly tackles the high cost of living that is crushing families like mine. His plan to set property taxes at the purchase price would prevent us from being taxed out of our homes, which is a huge concern for long-term stability and financial security. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he clearly advocates for 'parental rights in education' and seeks to 'remove bias from classrooms,' which is vital for preserving the moral education of our children and shielding them from secular ideologies. His belief in the 'sanctity of life' also aligns with our religious principles. Furthermore, his stance against 'runaway policies and mandates dictated by State, County, City and Town agencies' shows he will fight against governmental overreach that can infringe on our community's freedoms. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong push for free market capitalism, low taxes, and minimal government rules. This approach makes Oregon a better place for businesses to grow, which helps company profits and boosts stock values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his direct involvement with Israel, which is paramount to my values. His work as a Senior Foreign Military Sales Airframe Engineer for Israel's F-35 fighter jet shows a clear commitment to Israel's security and sovereignty. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy of opposing "free handouts" to the homeless without anything in return is appalling, as it lacks compassion and fails to address the root causes of our city's homelessness crisis, which demands humane and supportive solutions. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he clearly states that the right to bear arms, enshrined in both the US and Oregon Constitutions, should not be infringed upon. This strong and direct support for the Second Amendment is crucial for protecting gun ownership in our state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because their support for a 'free market system for health insurance and healthcare delivery' fundamentally undermines the goal of universal, affordable healthcare. A market-driven system often leaves many without necessary care, which is unacceptable. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he believes abortion should only be legal in cases of rape, incest, or to save the mother's life, and explicitly does not support it for birth control. This stance severely restricts bodily autonomy, a fundamental gender right, for many individuals. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Frank Mansfield low because his call for "free market capitalism, low taxes, minimal regulations, and limited government intervention" would strip away the vital public services and environmental protections that make Oregon a livable place, prioritizing corporate profits over community well-being. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he emphasizes constitutional adherence and law and order, which are vital for a strong immigration system. Maintaining a society based on accountability and personal responsibility is essential to my values, and these principles would support stricter immigration enforcement. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he strongly supports policies that directly fight inflation by cutting taxes and reducing government waste. He proposes enshrining 'no sales taxes' into the state constitution and wants to fix property taxes to stop annual increases, which would directly lower costs for families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their strong commitment to individual liberty and economic freedom, which are core Libertarian values. Mansfield explicitly advocates for free market capitalism, low taxes, minimal regulations, and limited government intervention, which directly reduces the burden on individuals and businesses. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because his stance on abortion, explicitly stating it is 'killing the economy,' devalues individual bodily autonomy and relies on economic arguments over fundamental human rights. This position severely conflicts with the humanist principle that personal ethical decisions should be respected and not dictated by economic utility or religious dogma. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy to enshrine "no sales taxes" into the state constitution and cancel the tax on gross sales directly addresses the burden on families and businesses. This is important for promoting economic growth and ensuring financial stability for working people, a core value for a thriving community. He also strongly supports law and order by advocating for protester liability for damages. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong stance on fiscal responsibility and tax reform, which directly helps families and businesses thrive. He proposes making it part of the state constitution that there will be no sales taxes, and he wants to change property taxes so they are based on the purchase price, not yearly increases. This is critical for economic stability and allows people to keep more of their hard-earned money to invest in their families and futures. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because his comments about 'reverse discrimination' and refusal to acknowledge the need for reparations are deeply offensive and dismissive of racial justice. His stance against 'free handouts' for the homeless and 'illegals' shows a serious lack of empathy and understanding for vulnerable people, which goes against everything Portland stands for. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Frank Mansfield low because his conservative platform focuses on limited government and holding protesters liable for damages, which goes against the spirit of advocacy and community action important to many Portland service workers. His ideas won't help us get better wages or housing. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their "Law and Order" policy. They advocate for laws based on "protection of society, personal responsibility, accountability, and reformation, while preserving victims' rights." This focus on accountability and victims is important for ensuring justice and deterring future crime. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because his platform emphasizes strict constitutional adherence, minimal government intervention, and low taxes, which does not align with the progressive values of investing in social safety nets and community support that are vital to Portland. His stance against abortion for economic reasons also directly contradicts reproductive rights. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he does not support abortion as a method of birth control, recognizing the value of life. While he holds some exceptions for abortion, his general opposition to it for convenience aligns with the Catholic teaching that life is a gift, and he also champions traditional education and fiscal responsibility, which supports a stable society for families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Frank Mansfield very high because his military background and focus on fiscal responsibility are exactly what we need to fix Oregon's wasteful government spending. He wants to ensure our tax dollars are managed transparently and supports stricter sales tax restrictions, which is vital for reducing the burden on working families and seniors in this state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Frank Mansfield very low because his belief that abortion harms the economy and his call to make protesters liable for damages are extremely regressive, threatening fundamental reproductive rights and the essential right to protest. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he clearly puts fiscal responsibility and individual property rights first, which is what we need in Salem. His idea to stop annual property tax raises and set them at the purchase price would protect families like mine from being taxed right out of our homes, which is a real worry in rural areas. He also wants to ensure protesters are held accountable for damages, which is important for law and order. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his stance on issues like criminalizing peaceful protests and restricting abortion rights is completely unacceptable. We need leaders who protect fundamental freedoms and support social justice, not those who try to drag us backward. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because his Republican stances are largely incompatible with progressive ideals. While he acknowledges some instances where abortion should be legal, his overall party affiliation and stated focus on 'constitutional adherence' and 'law and order' typically signal opposition to reproductive freedom and social justice reforms. His call for 'stricter sales tax restrictions' and opposition to teacher unions lobbying schools also directly undermine public services and workers' rights, which are essential for a fair society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Frank Mansfield very high because he emphasizes fiscal responsibility and protecting Oregon from becoming a 'California socialist state'. His focus on parental rights in education, holding criminals and violent protesters accountable, and eliminating sales tax shows a strong commitment to common sense and individual freedoms. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear stance on taxation and fiscal responsibility, which is crucial for protecting personal wealth. His proposal to enshrine 'no sales taxes' into the state constitution and cancel the gross sales tax directly benefits high-income residents by minimizing the tax burden on our investments and transactions. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his opposition to "free handouts" for the homeless and immigrants directly contradicts our fundamental progressive value of social safety nets and compassion for vulnerable populations. His fiscal conservatism, including a call for "no sales tax period," would severely undermine public services and essential state funding. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate third because he strongly advocates for parental rights and school choice in education, which is vital for raising children in our faith. He explicitly said, 'If people want to take their child out and go to a private school, then they should be able to do that,' emphasizing parental freedom over state control. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low due to his strong stance against environmental preservation, advocating for 'stewardship, not preservation' of forests, and his desire to remove both personal property taxes and sales tax. These positions are a direct threat to funding public services and protecting our natural environment, which are critical values for me as an urban resident. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their policy on abortion, while allowing exceptions, includes the scientifically unfounded rationale that it 'damages the nation's economy' by decreasing population, which undermines evidence-based policymaking and reproductive autonomy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he talks a lot about fiscal responsibility and making sure our taxes are spent wisely, which is important to me. He wants to stop the automatic 3% increases on property taxes and get rid of sales taxes, which would really help older residents on fixed incomes keep their homes and afford everyday essentials. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his plan to stop property taxes from going up automatically every year, and fixing them at the purchase price, would really help regular folks keep their homes. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he strongly advocates for fiscal responsibility, which is crucial for our community's stability. He wants to stop sales taxes and prevent property taxes from increasing automatically, which helps families and seniors keep their homes. This protects our hard-earned money and ensures the government is accountable, a value I find most important. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because his platform includes deeply exclusionary views, such as opposing "free handouts" to the homeless and immigrants, which completely undermines the Green Party's core value of social justice and compassion for all community members. His anti-union stance and focus on deregulation also threaten worker rights and environmental protections. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because they prioritize keeping our suburbs special and giving residents a real say in what happens here. They stand up for local zoning rules and support our small businesses, which is key to maintaining our community's unique feel and ensuring our property values stay strong. Local control over our neighborhoods is absolutely essential for our quality of life. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because of his strong belief that the U.S. and Oregon Constitutions are the 'bedrock' of the nation and state, and all laws must be consistent with them. This commitment to constitutional adherence and higher laws ensures a stable and just society, which reflects the principles of dharma in governance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Frank Mansfield low because his ideas about "free market capitalism" and "low taxes" would likely hurt the social programs and support that many families in our community rely on. He wants to remove personal property taxes and sales tax, which sounds good but could mean less money for schools and services. (0 votes)

State Senate District 17

#1
Lisa Reynolds

Reason I rank Lisa Reynolds lowest because she killed a bill that would have kept drug needles away from our schools and parks, and then didn't even seem to listen to community groups who were trying to make our city safer. This shows a real disconnect from the everyday struggles we face with public safety and impacts my trust in her ability to represent our needs. (7 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her legislative history clearly shows a strong commitment to gender rights. She helped pass a law that protects access to reproductive healthcare and gender-affirming care in Oregon, which is crucial for bodily autonomy. This action directly supports the fundamental right of individuals to make their own health decisions, a value I prioritize above all else. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because she is a strong supporter of gun control, which directly threatens our Second Amendment rights. She has actively pushed for laws like requiring locked guns and banning ghost guns, and wants to expand red flag laws and raise the age to buy firearms. These policies restrict law-abiding citizens and are a direct attack on our right to self-defense, which is the most important value. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate lowest due to her decision to kill legislation that would have kept drug paraphernalia away from schools, despite initially supporting it. This action shows a failure to prioritize the safety and moral well-being of our children and community, which directly undermines Dharma and the trust placed in leadership. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her decision to kill Senate Bill 1573, which would have prevented drug paraphernalia distribution near schools, directly undermined the safety of our children in public spaces. This action shows a lack of commitment to addressing immediate public safety concerns that deeply affect our community's well-being. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while she has pushed for important things like the Oregon Child Tax Credit, which helps struggling families, her actions on community safety are concerning. She killed a bill to keep drug paraphernalia away from schools, and it felt like she ignored community concerns, which makes it hard to trust she's really listening to people like us. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because of their clear support for increased government spending and tax measures, which goes against my priority of lower taxes. Lisa Reynolds championed the Oregon Child Tax Credit, providing $1000/year to low-income families, and voted to extend taxes on forest products. These actions show a preference for using taxpayer money to fund social programs. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy of giving low-income families a $1,000 yearly tax credit for children helps directly put money in our pockets. This matters because every dollar counts when you're struggling to pay for food and bills, and it helps ease the burden of raising kids when things are tight. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of her unwavering support for abortion and gender-affirming care, as shown by her championship of HB 2002. These policies directly contradict the sanctity of human life and God's design for creation, which are paramount moral values, making her unsuitable for representing our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her policy stance on 'Our Bodies, Our Decisions,' including supporting gender-affirming care protections, directly undermines parental control over critical medical decisions for their minor children. It goes against the essential right of parents to guide their children's healthcare choices, which is a fundamental value for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Lisa Reynolds highest because her legislative history consistently champions policies that directly combat systemic inequality, such as the Oregon Child Tax Credit, which provides crucial financial support to low-income families. This policy directly addresses economic injustice and promotes the well-being of our most vulnerable residents, a core progressive value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their policy priorities, like the Child Tax Credit and highest K-12 budget expenditure, indicate a focus on increased government spending. Such policies often lead to higher taxes or state debt, which can reduce corporate profits and negatively impact investor confidence, hindering stock market growth in a state already struggling with its business reputation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy record demonstrates a commitment to science-based public health and reproductive freedom, which are crucial for a secular society free from religious interference. Her work as a pediatrician informs her advocacy for widely available vaccines and access to abortion services, ensuring healthcare decisions are rooted in evidence and individual autonomy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Lisa Reynolds lowest because her actions regarding a bill to restrict needle handouts near schools raise serious concerns about her commitment to immediate community safety. The reported killing of Senate Bill 1573 in committee, which aimed to protect our children from public drug paraphernalia, is a profound disappointment and undermines the critical value of safeguarding our public spaces. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because she actively supports policies that protect immigrants and limit federal immigration enforcement, directly opposing my core values. She sponsored a bill to provide grants for immigrants to get legal status, and she publicly condemned federal immigration operations, calling them 'aggressive' and 'intimidating,' which makes it harder to control who is in our state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her legislative record clearly shows a commitment to climate action, which is essential for protecting our future in Oregon. She actively works to reduce our ecological footprint, evidenced by her co-sponsorship of a bill that made Oregon the first state to ban polystyrene foam containers for prepared food. This directly reduces plastic pollution, a major environmental problem. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her focus on ending child poverty and securing housing for families is important for social justice in our community. Her work on the Oregon Child Tax Credit and 'Momnibus 2025' addresses critical needs. However, her actions regarding Senate Bill 1573, where she was criticized for not engaging the community before killing the bill, raise concerns about transparency and grassroots democracy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because even though she has passed important laws to help families, like the Oregon Child Tax Credit, she has also broken trust with our community. She killed a bill that would have stopped drug needle handouts near schools, despite initially supporting it and ignoring the concerns of many neighbors. It is important that our leaders listen to the people they serve and keep their promises, especially when it comes to our children's safety. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Lisa Reynolds lowest due to her focus on expanding social programs like the Child Tax Credit, which can lead to higher taxes and increased government spending, impacting high-income residents like myself. Her decision to kill Senate Bill 1573, which aimed to regulate drug paraphernalia near schools, despite community support, demonstrated a concerning lack of responsiveness to pressing public safety issues that directly affect neighborhood quality and property values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Lisa Reynolds as the best candidate because her consistent legislative record demonstrates a deep commitment to progressive social policies, which is essential for our community. She has actively championed abortion access, passed crucial gun safety laws like outlawing ghost guns, and established a child tax credit, directly addressing inequities and protecting vulnerable populations. These actions reflect the core progressive values of care and equity that I prioritize. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her long history as a pediatrician and her legislative record clearly show a strong commitment to making healthcare accessible and affordable for all Oregonians. She championed access to maternal and child health services, fought for protections for abortion services, and pushed for stronger oversight of healthcare agencies. As an example, she co-sponsored Senate Bill 28 to ensure commercial insurers pay independent primary care clinics fairly, which helps keep local clinics open for people to get the care they need. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her consistent efforts to support families through policies like the Child Tax Credit and investments in K-12 education are crucial. Providing affordable childcare and strengthening maternal-child health directly benefits working families and ensures our children have the best start in life, which is a core value for our community's long-term prosperity. While I have concerns about specific legislative actions, her dedication to these fundamental family supports is undeniable. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because of their strong policy record on reproductive freedom and social support. They championed access to abortion and protected providers in Oregon, which is super important for bodily autonomy. Also, they helped create the Oregon Child Tax Credit, which directly helps families struggling with poverty, a key step towards making our community more equitable. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest due to her consistent record of supporting increased government intervention and taxation. Her vote on HB5201, which created or increased fees on farmers, directly undermines economic freedom and demonstrates a willingness to expand state control over private enterprise. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, while her legislative record includes positive actions on healthcare access and child welfare, her decision to unilaterally block Senate Bill 1573 without adequate constituent consultation shows a concerning lack of transparency and community engagement, which is vital for building public trust. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their action to kill Senate Bill 1573, which would have banned the distribution of drug pipes and needles near schools. This decision goes against the crucial value of protecting children and keeping public spaces clear of drug-related dangers in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while she supported the Child Tax Credit to help families with high costs, this is a spending measure. My top priority is to reduce the root causes of inflation, and increased spending can sometimes add to inflationary pressures, even if it aims to provide relief. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her focus on child poverty, early childhood development, and passing the Child Tax Credit directly helps middle-income families afford daily life and childcare. This commitment to supporting families and children through legislative action is very important for our community's well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because she consistently supports policies that go against my values, such as passing gun safety legislation that infringes on our Second Amendment rights. Such policies undermine individual liberties and the right to self-defense, which is a fundamental American principle for protecting families and property. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy record shows a clear commitment to addressing systemic issues that affect students and vulnerable communities, which is incredibly important for our future. She championed the Oregon Child Tax Credit, aiming to reduce child poverty by 50%, which directly helps families and creates a more equitable society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her record on gun violence prevention, like requiring guns to be locked when not in use and outlawing ghost guns, goes against my fundamental right to protect myself and my family. Personal safety and the ability to defend my property are paramount, and these policies make it harder for law-abiding citizens. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while she generally supports good progressive policies like reducing child poverty and expanding healthcare, her recent actions regarding Senate Bill 1573 and the lack of communication with constituents about it are very concerning. Trust and transparency are crucial, and it felt like she ignored community input on a vital issue like drug paraphernalia near schools. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her strong legislative history of passing the Child Tax Credit and championing maternal health policies directly fights systemic poverty, providing essential financial stability and care for our most vulnerable families. This support is vital for creating equitable opportunities and strengthening our community's foundation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Lisa Reynolds low because she killed a bill that would have regulated drug paraphernalia near schools, despite community support. This action showed she doesn't prioritize the safety and cleanliness of our neighborhoods, especially for children, which is a betrayal of the trust we place in our leaders to maintain order in our city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her consistent support for access to abortion services goes against the sanctity of life, which is a fundamental biblical truth. Furthermore, her actions regarding Senate Bill 1573, which aimed to regulate drug paraphernalia, show a disregard for community safety concerns in our neighborhoods. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong legislative record on critical social issues, which directly impacts the wellbeing of urban families. As a pediatrician, her focus on maternal and child health, including passing the Child Tax Credit and championing the 'Momnibus 2025' legislation, shows a deep commitment to addressing root causes of poverty and supporting our most vulnerable residents. She has also been a fierce advocate for gun violence prevention, which is crucial for safer communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her unwavering commitment to policies supporting children and families, like helping to pass the Child Tax Credit, demonstrates a vital dedication to the well-being of our community's future generations, which is a paramount value for me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she has done good work for children and families, which is important for our community's future. Her efforts on the Child Tax Credit and the 'Momnibus' bill show she cares deeply about helping vulnerable mothers and babies. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while she has helped with housing and child support, which is good for us, she recently killed a bill that would stop handing out drug needles near schools. That makes me worry about our kids' safety in public places. We need leaders who understand that public safety is just as important as other family issues. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her actions show a disconnect from what Portland truly needs for safety and order. For example, she killed a bill that would have regulated drug paraphernalia near schools, which deeply impacts community well-being and shows a disregard for local concerns. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her actions on local safety issues have been disappointing. She killed a bill that would have stopped drug paraphernalia being handed out near schools, which directly impacts the safety and cleanliness of our neighborhoods. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because she killed Senate Bill 1573, which would have stopped drug paraphernalia handouts near schools. This action shows a clear failure to prioritize public safety and listen to concerned citizens, undermining the trust needed for effective governance in our city. (0 votes)
#2
Autumn Sharp

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while her background in ethnobotany and work with Ecotrust show a vital commitment to environmental and equity-driven initiatives, her approach to homelessness focuses heavily on removing camps and restricting needle handouts near schools, which could be seen as less aligned with a harm-reduction and housing-first approach that is essential for true social justice. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her commitment to immediate community safety, especially around schools and parks, is paramount. The presence of drugs and needles near children is an intolerable threat to our families' well-being and future generations. Her practical success with Couch Park shows she can deliver real results, ensuring our children can grow up in a secure environment. This value of community safety and protecting our youth is the foundation for all other progress. (6 votes)

Reason I rank Autumn Sharp highest because she has actually fixed problems in our community, like making Couch Park safe again from drug use and needles. This shows she gets things done and prioritizes real public safety and livability, which is incredibly important for Portlanders tired of seeing our neighborhoods decline. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because of her strong practical actions to protect our children and communities from the harmful effects of drugs. Her direct work with Friends of Couch Park to make neighborhoods safe demonstrates a commitment to community welfare, a vital aspect of righteous living that ensures a pure environment for our youth. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Autumn Sharp highest because her strong stance on community safety and her direct action to protect children from drug activity align with the paramount value of securing our neighborhoods. Her work to keep drugs and needles away from schools and parks shows a commitment to creating a safe environment for families and children, which is essential for the flourishing of our community. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her concrete actions to ensure safer neighborhoods and protect children from harmful influences. Her work with Friends of Couch Park to keep drugs and needles away from schools and parks demonstrates a practical commitment to public safety and community well-being, which is vital for preserving the purity of our environment and the innocence of our youth. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her background in strategic operations and managing budgets suggests a strong focus on fiscal efficiency and responsible spending. This is crucial for controlling inflation, which directly impacts the cost of living for voters in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her pragmatic approach to public safety and homelessness, specifically her successful work in making local spaces like Couch Park safe and inviting again, directly addresses critical quality of life issues that profoundly affect our neighborhoods. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her deep roots in community-level organizing and her focus on environmental sustainability, which are important for Portland. Her work with Ecotrust and co-founding Friends of Couch Park demonstrates practical leadership in improving urban spaces and addressing homelessness with compassion. However, her challenge to the incumbent, Lisa Reynolds, over the handling of a bill regulating needle handouts, while highlighting a valid concern for some, could be seen as slightly less aligned with a broader, uncompromising progressive agenda that prioritizes harm reduction strategies. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear focus on public safety and direct action against crime. Their work with Friends of Couch Park to remove drugs and needles from public spaces shows a commitment to making our neighborhoods safe for families and children, which is the most important value for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her focus on making parks and neighborhoods safer by dealing with things like drug use and needles is important for families. A safe place to live and for kids to play is a basic need that affects our daily lives and well-being, even if it doesn't directly put money in our hands. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because there is no clear information on their tax policy, making their stance on this critical issue unknown. While Autumn Sharp is challenging the incumbent, the primary reason for her candidacy appears to be related to local issues like drug paraphernalia regulation, not specifically taxes. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Autumn Sharp second because she's shown real leadership in making our parks safe, which directly addresses the decay we've seen in Portland. Her work with Friends of Couch Park to get rid of drugs and needles near schools proves she's serious about public safety, a value that is crucial for our children and our city's future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her strong focus on keeping schools and neighborhoods safe directly helps parents protect their children, which is a key part of parental control. Her work to remove drugs and unsafe conditions from areas where children play gives parents peace of mind that their children are in a secure environment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because their platform includes a focus on thriving small businesses and their background is in the corporate sector. A healthy small business environment contributes to broader economic growth and stability, which indirectly supports the stock market by fostering a positive business climate and attracting investment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she actively challenges the status quo on public safety, especially regarding drugs and needles near our schools. Her decision to run against the incumbent over the failed needle handout bill shows she's willing to fight for real change, which is vital for restoring basic order and protecting our kids in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she shows real, local action on public safety, which is vital for service workers and our families using Portland's parks. Her work with Friends of Couch Park to make it safe from drugs and needles directly helps the community where we live and work. This practical approach to immediate problems is more trustworthy than empty promises. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her professional background at Ecotrust and her master's degree in ethnobotany show a deep, practical commitment to ecological wisdom and connecting people with the environment. This focus on equity-driven environmental programs is fundamental to a sustainable future for Portland and aligns perfectly with our urgent need for green leadership. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle. While she is a Democrat, I haven't found her taking a strong stance against gun rights. She also challenged Senator Reynolds over a bill that Republicans supported, showing she might not always follow the party line on safety issues. This gives me a little hope she wouldn't push for more gun control, which is vital for protecting our freedoms, but she is still a Democrat. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because she does not have a clear public stance on immigration, which means she is not actively working against stricter immigration enforcement like some others. Her platform focuses on local community safety issues like removing drugs and addressing homelessness, which are important, but she hasn't expressed views that would either strengthen or weaken our ability to manage immigration effectively. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because, even though she is a Democrat, her strong focus on keeping drugs and needles out of parks and schools shows she cares about real public safety in our neighborhoods. This practical approach to making our communities safer, as demonstrated by her work with Friends of Couch Park, offers a glimmer of hope that she could address Portland's growing crime and drug problems, a core value for voters who want law and order. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because she has shown a dedication to public health concerns, especially those related to substance use and community safety. She speaks about helping those with substance use disorders get treatment and addressing dangerous conditions like needles in public spaces, which directly impacts the health of our communities, particularly children. Her efforts with Friends of Couch Park to make public areas safer from drug paraphernalia reflect a concern for preventative health and well-being. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Autumn Sharp in the middle because while she is a Democrat with a focus on community well-being, her emphasis on "real safety" and her challenge to an incumbent Democrat over Senate Bill 1573, which would regulate drug paraphernalia near schools, suggests a pragmatic approach that, while understandable for local issues, might at times diverge from a purely harm reduction perspective. However, her work with Ecotrust and her focus on helping homeless neighbors and those with substance use disorders shows a compassionate and progressive intent. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their practical approach to environmental and community issues. Their work as Assets Operations Manager for Ecotrust shows a real commitment to integrating economic, environmental, and equitable solutions, which is vital for Portland's future. Plus, their focus on combining 'real safety with real compassion' for our unhoused neighbors is a pragmatic way to address complex urban challenges. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because, while a Democrat, her challenge to the incumbent stems from a concern for government accountability and responsiveness to local community input, particularly regarding Senate Bill 1573. This shows a desire for more transparent and effective local governance, which is important for protecting individual interests, even if the bill itself involved regulation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her professional background at Ecotrust, coupled with her academic focus on ethnobotany, demonstrates a deep commitment to environmental sustainability and community well-being. This aligns with the humanist value of protecting our shared planet and fostering equitable communities for all. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle. While her campaign focuses on community safety and family well-being, which are important, I haven't found specific, explicit statements on her support for reproductive rights or gender-affirming care. However, her background in equity-driven programs and her Democratic party affiliation suggest a more favorable stance than the Republican candidate, indicating a potential alignment with gender rights, though not as clearly demonstrated as the top candidate. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Autumn Sharp second because she brings a valuable focus on practical, community-level solutions for public safety and homelessness, which is a pressing concern for our neighborhoods. Her work with Friends of Couch Park to make it safer from drug activity shows she’s committed to tangible improvements while still advocating for compassion. While her approach might be less about broad systemic change than my top choice, her dedication to making our immediate surroundings safer for everyone, especially children, is important. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she advocates for safer neighborhoods and protecting children from drug issues, a stance that aligns with our call to protect the vulnerable. Her challenge to the incumbent over a bill to prevent needle handouts near schools shows she is willing to stand up for the safety and moral environment of our youth, which is crucial for their well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her commitment to making local parks and neighborhoods safer directly impacts the quality of life for families. Her work with Friends of Couch Park shows she can get things done, combining real safety with compassion to address drug use and homelessness in a way that protects children and improves public spaces. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her commitment to making communities safe by getting drugs and needles away from schools shows she understands real problems. It's important that our children can be safe where they play, and her actions with Couch Park prove she can get things done. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their proven dedication to improving local community safety, which directly impacts our daily lives in Portland. Her work with Friends of Couch Park to make it safe from drugs and needles shows she takes real action. This commitment to tangible local improvements and listening to neighbors is incredibly important to me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her history of direct action, like turning Couch Park from a dangerous place with needles into a safe space for children, proves she understands and prioritizes the immediate safety and well-being of our community, especially our youth. This is crucial for building trust and ensuring our neighborhoods are places where families can thrive without fear. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her history of successfully cleaning up Couch Park from drugs and antisocial behavior shows real, practical leadership in making our public spaces safe for families. Her focus on keeping drugs and needles away from schools and parks directly addresses a vital community concern for our children's well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Autumn Sharp second because her professional background at Ecotrust and her involvement with the Multnomah County Homelessness Response System demonstrate a clear commitment to environmental justice and addressing our city's housing crisis through community-based solutions. Her focus on equity-driven programs and practical leadership aligns with the need for compassionate yet effective action on these critical issues. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because she has actively worked to make our parks and neighborhoods safer by removing drugs and needles from areas where children play. Her commitment to 'real safety' for families and vulnerable people, and her past success with Friends of Couch Park, shows practical leadership that aligns with our desire for a moral and orderly community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because she advocates for practical, community-led solutions to significant public health and safety issues, aligning with a secular focus on tangible well-being. Her leadership in co-founding Friends of Couch Park to address drug use and safety in public spaces demonstrates a direct, secular approach to improving community conditions without relying on religious dogma. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she has proven she can make our neighborhoods safer, which is vital for old folks like me. Her work to clean up Couch Park shows she knows how to handle the drug and homelessness issues that make many of us feel unsafe. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she is serious about making our neighborhoods safe for working families. She actually cleaned up Couch Park, getting rid of the drugs and needles that made it dangerous for kids. This shows she gets things done and won't stand by while our communities decline, which is important for the safety of our children. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because her focus on practical solutions for public safety is exactly what Portland needs. Her work to make Couch Park safe by removing drugs and needles shows she can actually get things done, which directly benefits our children and neighborhoods. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she clearly understands the need for safer neighborhoods, which is paramount for families. Her efforts with Friends of Couch Park to make a local park safe from drugs and needles directly shows her commitment to protecting children and improving our community's well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she shows real dedication to our community and the safety of our children, especially in our parks. She co-founded Friends of Couch Park to clean up dangerous drug needles, showing she takes direct action when politicians fail. This hands-on commitment to protecting our families and neighborhoods is exactly the kind of leadership we need. (0 votes)
#3
John Chee

Reason I rank John Chee as the worst candidate because his Republican platform explicitly advocates for lower taxes, which directly conflicts with the progressive vision for robust public services and a strong social safety net that I believe Portland and Oregon urgently need. His emphasis on "protecting our values" and "God wills it" suggests a conservative social agenda that does not align with the inclusive and secular governance important to our community. (7 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign explicitly uses religious appeals, which directly conflicts with the foundational principle of separation of church and state vital for a secular government. His slogan, 'God wills it!', indicates a desire to infuse religious doctrine into public policy, undermining secular governance and individual freedoms. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he talks about lower taxes and stability, which sounds good, his plans aren't as clear as the others on how he'd actually fix things here in Portland. We need leaders with solid, practical ideas to bring back order. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his clear commitment to restoring traditional values and securing a future rooted in divine will. His promise to protect our values and work for strong families and safe communities shows a dedication to Dharma, which is paramount for a righteous society where moral order is upheld. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy focus on lower taxes and safer communities directly addresses the most critical problems facing Portland. We need leaders who will prioritize fiscal responsibility and public order, which are essential for a free and prosperous city, instead of more spending that doesn't fix anything. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign explicitly uses religious justification for policy, stating "God wills it!", which directly conflicts with the humanist principle of secular governance and evidence-based decision-making for the common good. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their clear policy stance on lower taxes, which is fundamental to individual economic liberty. Reduced taxation means people keep more of their earnings, fostering personal freedom and economic growth without government overreach. (1 votes)

Reason I rank John Chee second because his stated platform of prioritizing lower taxes is critical for protecting my financial assets and ensuring continued economic growth in Oregon. His focus on safe communities also aligns with my desire for a stable and desirable living environment in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because they state a commitment to 'safe communities' as a core reason for running. While specific policy details are limited, a Republican candidate generally aligns with prioritizing law and order, which is a critical value for ensuring public safety in our city. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform, which emphasizes "lower taxes," fails to address the deep-seated economic and social inequalities that disproportionately harm our community, showing a clear lack of understanding for the structural changes needed to achieve true justice and equity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I can't find clear information about what he plans to do to help people like me with low incomes, especially on things like housing or jobs. It's important to know a candidate's specific plans for our financial struggles, and without them, it's hard to support him. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his platform directly supports lower taxes and safer communities, which are essential for true prosperity. His commitment to fiscal responsibility and a strong stance against crime is what Oregon needs to protect our hard-earned money and secure our neighborhoods from disorder. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on lower taxes and 'strong families' doesn't offer specific plans that directly help service workers with our daily struggles. I need policies that address affordable housing and better wages, not just broad statements that don't clearly benefit working people in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank John Chee medium because he talks about lower taxes and safe communities, which are critical values for me. We need someone who understands how high taxes impact families and who will actively work to make our neighborhoods secure again, and his tech background suggests a practical approach to these pressing issues. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their strong support for lower taxes, which directly boosts corporate profits and encourages investment. Lower taxes allow businesses to retain more earnings, leading to higher stock valuations and a more attractive market for investors, which is crucial for overall financial prosperity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his platform explicitly supports strong families and protecting our values, which is the most important value for me. This focus means he will likely back policies that give parents more control over their children's upbringing and education, safeguarding our children's future as we see fit. (1 votes)

Reason I rank John Chee lowest because, as a Republican candidate whose platform emphasizes 'protect our values' without mentioning reproductive rights, it strongly suggests he would not support abortion access. Protecting the right to choose is my top priority, and his party affiliation and platform indicate he would likely oppose this crucial freedom. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign platform does not include any clear policies or statements addressing climate change, which is the most urgent issue facing our community. Without a stated commitment to climate action, he cannot be trusted to prioritize the necessary steps to protect Oregon from rising temperatures and extreme weather. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he is a Republican running for the State Senate. The Republican Party in Oregon generally supports Second Amendment rights and opposes new gun control laws, which is the most important value for me. Even without specific statements from him, his party affiliation is a clear sign he will protect our right to own firearms. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his focus on 'safe communities' and 'protecting our values' aligns with a stricter approach to immigration. Oregon Republicans, his party, have pushed to change the state's sanctuary law to allow cooperation with federal agents to remove violent criminals, which would make our communities safer by ensuring that those who commit serious crimes are deported. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest. His campaign emphasizes 'protecting our values' and religious references without any mention of gender rights or reproductive freedom. This general language, coming from a Republican candidate, suggests a high likelihood that his policies would not support, and potentially even undermine, the critical gender rights that are essential for the well-being and equality of all people in Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because I could not find any specific information about his stance or plans regarding healthcare policy. As a single-issue healthcare voter, it is crucial that a candidate clearly articulates their approach to improving healthcare access, affordability, and quality for Oregonians. Without this information, I cannot determine if he would prioritize the essential healthcare needs of our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his stated goals of lower taxes and strong families are important, his platform lacks the concrete and detailed plans needed to tackle the immediate challenges facing our community. We need leaders who can articulate precise strategies for economic growth and public safety that directly benefit small businesses and ensure a stable environment, rather than just broad statements. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because their policy priorities for 'lower taxes' and 'protecting our values' do not align with the progressive changes Portland needs. An emphasis on tax cuts often hurts public services, like affordable housing and climate initiatives, which are crucial for our community. This approach contradicts the values of social equity and environmental responsibility that I prioritize. (0 votes)

Reason I rank John Chee lowest because his platform, with its emphasis on 'lower taxes' and 'protecting our values,' is completely out of step with the progressive vision needed for Portland. These policies often lead to cuts in vital social services and perpetuate the very inequities we are fighting against. His conservative stance would actively harm the most vulnerable in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available about his stance or proposed policies on inflation or economic stability. Without understanding his approach to managing the cost of living, I cannot confidently support him as a single-issue inflation voter. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform directly promotes strong families and protecting our values, with an explicit appeal to God's will. This commitment to faith and family is the most important value, as it forms the foundation of a moral society and ensures the spiritual well-being of our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he talks about lower taxes and safe communities, his platform lacks specific details on how he plans to achieve these goals in a way that addresses the complex issues facing Portlanders. We need concrete plans to feel confident in a candidate's ability to deliver real change. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform, emphasizing 'lower taxes' and 'protect our values' from a Republican perspective, does not address the urgent progressive issues like climate action, affordable housing, or comprehensive social safety nets that are critical for Portland's future and for students. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his focus on lower taxes aligns with my belief that government should take less from hardworking folks. Less taxes mean more money stays in our pockets, which is vital for rural families and businesses trying to make a living, giving us more control over our own lives. (0 votes)

Reason I rank John Chee in the middle because his platform emphasizes strong families and safe communities, values that are deeply important to our way of life. His focus on traditional values and community well-being offers a sense of stability and protection, which is crucial for fostering a supportive environment. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on lower taxes and generic 'protecting values' does not align with the urgent progressive needs of Portland. As an office worker, I want strong investment in public services, affordable housing, and environmental protection, not policies that could cut them or push us backward. His Republican affiliation suggests a different direction for our city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear stance on safe communities, lower taxes, and strong families. These values are crucial for the stability and prosperity of our neighborhoods, ensuring that our children can grow up in a secure environment and that our hard-earned money stays in our pockets. (0 votes)

Reason I rank John Chee last because his platform, which emphasizes lower taxes and vague appeals to "protect our values," directly contradicts the progressive goal of funding essential social services and upholding inclusive community standards. Such fiscally conservative and socially ambiguous stances would undermine efforts to create a more equitable and supportive Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he stands for strong families and protecting our Christian values, which are the foundation of a righteous society. His campaign explicitly states 'God wills it!' and focuses on restoring stability, which is a clear sign of his commitment to biblical principles in governance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his stated policy positions, such as fighting for 'lower taxes' and 'protecting our values' as a Republican, do not align with the progressive priorities essential for urban Portland. My values prioritize robust social programs, environmental protection, and equitable public services, which often require increased public funding rather than tax reductions. His focus seems to diverge significantly from the needs and progressive vision of our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his emphasis on lower taxes and restoring stability suggests a move away from essential social programs and environmental protections, which I believe would severely undermine the progressive values and community support systems that Portland cherishes. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his plans are too general. He talks about 'safe communities' and 'lower taxes,' which sound good, but he doesn't give specific ways he'll tackle the real problems we face in Portland every day, like cleaning up our streets and getting people back to work. We need more than just promises; we need concrete actions. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he stands for strong families, safe communities, and lower taxes, which are essential for Portland's future. His commitment to protecting our values and restoring stability resonates deeply with my desire for a more traditional and orderly city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform emphasizes lower taxes and general conservative themes, without any stated commitment to ecological wisdom, robust environmental protection, or addressing systemic social inequalities. These priorities do not align with the urgent need for progressive environmental and social justice policies in our state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his focus on safe communities and lower taxes aligns with my priorities for our area. These are important for property owners and for making sure our hard-earned money stays in our pockets. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on lowering taxes does not help our working families and vulnerable neighbors in Portland. Our community believes in investing in public services like affordable housing, healthcare, and education to help everyone thrive. Cutting taxes often means cutting these vital programs, which goes against our value of supporting all members of our community. (0 votes)

State Senate District 19

#1
Rob Wagner

Reason I rank this candidate last because of his support for policies that increase the tax burden on hardworking Oregonians. As Senate President, he was involved in pushing for a significant gas tax increase and other fees, and then tried to move the vote to the May primary to avoid a backlash in the November general election. This shows a disregard for voter sentiment and further burdens families and businesses in an already expensive state. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because of his history of strongly supporting legislation to expand abortion access and gender-affirming care. As Senate President, he pushed for House Bill 2002, which initially would have allowed minors under 15 to obtain abortions without parental consent. This directly violates the sacred value of protecting innocent human life and parental rights, which are fundamental to a moral society. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear policy on fighting climate change, which is super important for our future. They passed bills in 2023 to address climate issues, including drought and water security. Climate action is essential for my generation, and we need leaders who actually tackle this crisis head-on. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank Rob Wagner low because, as Senate President, he represents the ongoing leadership that has failed to adequately address the rampant public disorder and drug crisis plaguing Portland. While he recently supported proposals to recriminalize drugs, this shift comes after years where the city's livability has drastically declined, demonstrating a reactive rather than proactive approach to restoring fundamental public safety. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he has a clear history of pushing for strict gun control, like when he introduced a bill that would have required permits to buy firearms and limited ammunition. These actions directly undermine the Second Amendment, which is the most important right for self-protection. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Rob Wagner first because his unwavering commitment to environmental protection and climate action is absolutely essential for Oregon's future. His recognition with the Perseverance Award from the Oregon League of Conservation Voters proves he's actively working to preserve our natural world, which is the most critical value for the long-term health and livability of our state. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Rob Wagner first because he is a strong voice for our immigrant communities, which is very important to me. He actively worked to pass a bill that helps vulnerable immigrant youth, protecting them from abuse and homelessness, which keeps our families safe and together. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his decisive action to mandate Holocaust and genocide education in Oregon schools. This policy directly confronts rising antisemitism by ensuring our children learn from history, which is essential for protecting our community and preserving Jewish memory. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his history of supporting policies that expand protections and services for immigrant communities, which would encourage more illegal immigration. This directly undermines the rule of law and the security of our state's borders, which is my most important value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy focus on addressing the housing and homelessness crisis directly benefits our community, providing stability for vulnerable residents. He supported a $400 million investment package to reduce homelessness and address affordable housing, which shows a commitment to the welfare of all Oregonians. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Rob Wagner first because of his strong, consistent record championing crucial progressive policies, especially his leadership in passing legislation for affordable housing and reproductive freedom. These issues directly impact the well-being and autonomy of Oregonians, and his work as Senate President demonstrates a deep commitment to our shared values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because while he has experience, his focus on large government spending and increased budgets, even for education, raises concerns about fiscal responsibility. It is important to prioritize efficient government and tax relief, and his approach could lead to higher taxes that burden families and small businesses, rather than empowering them directly. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on expanding government spending, such as approving the largest K-12 and higher education budgets in state history, and advocating for direct investments into various sectors, goes against the core Libertarian principle of limited government and fiscal restraint. These actions increase the tax burden on citizens and expand state control. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent support for inclusive social policies, such as expanding protections against bias crimes to include gender identity and sexual orientation. This demonstrates a commitment to secular social justice, which is vital for ensuring all individuals are treated equally under the law, free from discrimination rooted in religious or traditional biases. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because while he supports economic development and a crucial industry like semiconductors, his focus on state budget challenges and potential cuts, without a strong emphasis on broad tax relief or deregulation, offers less direct and comprehensive benefit to overall stock market growth compared to his opponent. He recognizes the need for cuts due to a state budget shortfall. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while he supported some tax cuts, he also acknowledges the need for various funding solutions for state services. He commented on referring a gas tax increase to voters, showing a willingness to consider new taxes in certain situations. My most important value is keeping taxes low, and his position is not as firm on reducing the overall tax burden for Portland residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear policy to explore and establish universal healthcare in Oregon, which is the most important value for ensuring all residents have access to necessary medical care. He supported Senate Bill 1089, which established a Universal Health Plan board to explore options for implementing universal health care in Oregon, aiming for high-quality health care access for everyone. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Rob Wagner first because he has actively supported racial justice and equity in Oregon. He publicly backed the People of Color Caucus and their ideas to fight racism, which is crucial for our community's survival. He even supported making displaying a noose a crime, which directly addresses hateful acts against Black people. This commitment to dismantling systemic oppression is the most important value for me, ensuring our safety and dignity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because while he is focused on economic development and has supported key initiatives like the semiconductor bill, his involvement in discussions around 'tax equity' and addressing budget shortfalls could lead to policies that increase the tax burden on high-income residents. My primary concern is protecting my wealth and investments, and his approach to state finances appears less focused on direct tax relief than his opponent. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his strong support for 'reproductive freedom' and gender-affirming care directly opposes the sanctity of life and biblical family values I uphold. He also previously refused to grant excused absences for religious observance during legislative sessions, which shows a disregard for religious freedom, a fundamental right. These policies threaten the moral fabric of our society and contradict the principles I believe should guide our state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Rob Wagner lower because while he acknowledges the need for budget cuts and financial sustainability, his priorities also include significant investments in areas like education and workforce training. These investments often mean more government spending, which can contribute to inflation. He mentioned legislative officials are looking at 3-5% funding cuts, but also aims to spur economic growth through efforts like improving higher education and workforce training. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Rob Wagner first because of his strong record on housing and addressing homelessness, which is a critical issue for our urban community. He championed a legislative package that committed over $150 million to address homelessness, expand support statewide, and prioritize affordable housing production through structural changes to land use. This demonstrates a commitment to ensuring everyone has a safe place to live, which is a fundamental value for Portland residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong track record in securing significant funding for public education, directly enhancing the intellectual and social development of all children. This commitment aligns with the humanist value of investing in comprehensive education, which is crucial for fostering an informed and capable citizenry. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Rob Wagner high because his legislative history clearly shows a commitment to funding public education, which is crucial for our kids and the future of our city. As Senate President, he's overseen the passage of the largest K-12 budget in state history, dedicating over $11 billion to the State School Fund for the upcoming biennium. This shows real action on a value that directly impacts our community's long-term health and prosperity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their policy work on affordable housing, which is crucial for everyday people in Portland. For example, he pushed for legislation that invested $100 million to create and preserve affordable housing options, helping those of us struggling to make ends meet. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he has supported some crime-related bills, his record does not show a consistent, comprehensive focus on strengthening law enforcement or increasing penalties for repeat offenders. His recent support for making threats against public officials a felony addresses one aspect of safety, but not the broader crime crisis impacting Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while his work on housing affordability and education funding is important, his support for spending taxpayer money on projects like the Blazers arena, even for economic reasons, seems less critical when people are struggling with basic costs. I value fiscal responsibility and ensuring our taxes go to the most pressing community needs first. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong commitment to public education, which is super important for our future. They helped pass the largest K-12 and higher education budgets ever in Oregon, showing they really value making education accessible and strong for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on big government spending and specific social issues doesn't seem to put rural needs first. While he talks about education, his past actions as Senate President lean towards more state-level programs and policies like gun control, which often don't consider the unique situations and values of folks out here. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent leadership in securing significant funding for public education. As Senate President, he has pushed for record K-12 and higher education budgets, which is crucial for a thriving community and a skilled workforce in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because, while he has supported large education budgets and general job growth, his priorities as Senate President are less specific on direct solutions to immediate community concerns like public safety and tax burdens. While balancing the budget and empowering senators are important, I prioritize tangible and immediate policy changes that directly address the rising cost of living and ensure safe streets for my family and community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on policies like 'sensible gun safety' restricts the rights of law-abiding citizens. Protecting individual freedoms, especially the right to bear arms, is a core value, and his position goes against that. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy to expand reproductive health care and gender-affirming care rights is essential for bodily autonomy and inclusive health access. This directly affects vulnerable communities by ensuring critical care, upholding the progressive value of social justice and equity, which is of paramount importance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he focuses on education, his platform emphasizes creating career pathways and comprehensive education, but does not specifically mention parental involvement or curriculum transparency. This lack of focus means he may not protect our children from influences that go against our religious principles, and preserving our faith and traditional family values is paramount. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he has experience as Senate President and works on education and protecting seniors, his platform doesn't address the urgent issues of public safety and immediate tax relief as directly as I'd like. We need someone who will specifically tackle the crime problem and the high cost of living that affects us old-timers most. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he has a strong history of advocating for workers and is committed to creating career paths. His past work as a director for the American Federation of Teachers shows he understands what working people need, aiming to strengthen the middle class and ensure folks have good jobs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his history of championing large government investments, while well-intentioned, often comes with increased spending and potential tax burdens that worry local businesses and families. While he advocates for important issues like education and housing, a traditional resident values fiscal restraint over expansive government programs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his stance on parental rights does not align with my core values. As Senate President, he was associated with Democratic colleagues who believed minors should not have to tell their parents to get an abortion, which undermines parental authority over critical decisions for their children. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear commitment to addressing climate change, which is the most urgent issue facing our planet. As Senate President, Rob Wagner has actively supported legislation to fight climate change, including measures for drought and water security, directly impacting Oregon's ecosystems and future generations. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he has been involved in significant investments for education and homelessness, the issues on our streets still feel out of control. As Senate President, he has overseen large spending packages, but the impact on daily safety and cost of living for suburban families has not been enough. We need more direct and immediate solutions for public safety and less focus on broad government programs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he supports education and balances the budget, his general focus on larger government spending and broader progressive policies does not align as closely with the values of fiscal discipline and traditional community values that are important. His legislative work, though bipartisan, does not show a pronounced emphasis on the specific moral and family-centric issues that are paramount. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong history of supporting climate action, which is the most important value. As Senate President, he helped pass a $90 million Climate Resiliency Package in 2023 to fund climate bills. (0 votes)
#2
Mary Dirksen

Reason I rank Mary Dirksen last because her focus on opposing new taxes and excessive regulations goes against the need for public investment in our city. An extreme urban resident understands that taxes are necessary to fund critical services like affordable housing, public transit, and environmental initiatives. Her stance on tax relief would ultimately harm our ability to address the systemic challenges facing Portland. (4 votes)

Reason I rank Mary Dirksen as the best choice because she promises to lower taxes and cut wasteful spending. This directly tackles inflation by reducing the financial burden on families and businesses. She states she will "fight to rein in wasteful spending, demand transparency for every tax dollar, and pursue meaningful tax relief." (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her campaign priorities completely ignore climate change and environmental protection, which is the most important value. Her platform focuses on taxes, the economy, and public safety, with no mention of the urgent climate crisis. (2 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because her campaign explicitly states it is "rooted in service, faith, and a deep commitment to a better Oregon." This overt reliance on faith in her political platform raises concerns about the separation of church and state, which is a fundamental principle for effective, secular governance where laws are based on reason and evidence rather than religious doctrine. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy to oppose new taxes and excessive regulations, along with her focus on strengthening consequences for repeat offenders, could undermine the funding for essential social services and lead to less compassionate solutions for complex community problems like homelessness. This approach prioritizes business interests over the comprehensive social support our city needs. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her campaign priorities do not explicitly address the protection or expansion of gender rights, reproductive freedom, or LGBTQ+ equality. Her focus on "parental involvement" in education, without further clarification, raises concerns about potential restrictions on inclusive curricula or access to gender-affirming resources, which goes against the critical value of individual autonomy and equal rights. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her clear commitment to parental involvement in education. She promises to push for curriculum transparency and increased parental involvement, which are essential for parents to guide their children's learning and uphold family values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy on lower taxes and less regulation directly helps rural families and small businesses. She wants to stop new taxes and reduce rules that hurt local job creators, which is vital for our area to grow and for people to keep more of their hard-earned money. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her platform prioritizes general public safety and supporting law enforcement, without mentioning any plans for new gun control laws. This approach aligns with the importance of keeping our communities safe while respecting the right to bear arms for self-defense. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her clear and strong commitment to lowering taxes. She explicitly promises to pursue meaningful tax relief for families and businesses, which directly helps Portland residents keep more of their money. This focus on reducing the tax burden is the most important value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because her campaign, as a Republican, focuses on 'faith' and does not mention protecting abortion access. This lack of explicit support, combined with her party's general stance in Oregon, suggests she would not champion reproductive rights, which is vital for women in our state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform does not prioritize healthcare, which is the most important issue for Oregon residents. Her stated priorities are public safety, lower taxes, education, and economic growth, with no specific policies or history of advocating for broad healthcare access or reform. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform prioritizes lower taxes and supporting businesses, which could negatively impact vital public services and social programs that many service workers rely on. She actively opposes new taxes and excessive regulations that could otherwise fund critical community support. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her clear policy to champion tax relief and oppose new taxes will directly boost corporate profits and investor confidence, thereby strengthening the stock market, which is my most important value. She wants Oregon to be a place where companies stop leaving and start choosing again. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she clearly states her intention to reduce the burden of government on individuals and businesses. Her platform promises to fight for meaningful tax relief and oppose new taxes and excessive regulations, which is crucial for fostering economic freedom and individual prosperity in Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong commitment to safeguarding children and upholding moral order, which aligns with the value of dharma. Her extensive work to combat human trafficking and support foster youth shows a dedication to protecting the most vulnerable in our society, ensuring a righteous community for all. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her main focus seems to be on tax relief for businesses, and less on direct aid for people struggling to pay rent or buy food. While I appreciate wanting to lower the cost of living, her plans for tax relief don't directly address my immediate needs for affordable housing or help with basic necessities. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her clear focus on public safety and lower taxes, which are essential for feeling secure and managing costs in Portland. She promises to strengthen consequences for repeat offenders and provide meaningful tax relief, which would help many old residents like me who worry about crime and rising bills. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her focus on public safety and supporting law enforcement suggests a commitment to the rule of law. While she doesn't explicitly state her immigration policy, a strong stance on law and order is crucial for controlling illegal immigration and protecting our communities, which is my most important value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform focuses on general issues like public safety and lower taxes, but lacks any specific commitment to combating antisemitism or addressing the unique concerns of the Jewish community. Our people need explicit representation and a strong voice against hate, which I do not see highlighted in her priorities. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her clear focus on tax relief and reducing the cost of living directly addresses the financial struggles faced by many families in Portland. Supporting policies that rein in wasteful government spending and provide tax relief is crucial for voters trying to make ends meet and feel less burdened by the rising expenses in our city. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her clear policy stance on lower taxes and fiscal discipline, which directly protects my financial interests and property values. Her commitment to rein in wasteful government spending and pursue tax relief for families and businesses will ensure a more stable economic environment, which is paramount for high-income residents in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy on "Education & Parental Involvement" directly addresses the need for "curriculum transparency" and increased parental say in what our children learn. This is crucial for upholding our religious values and ensuring our youth are not exposed to teachings that contradict our faith, which is the most important value for preserving our family and community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Mary Dirksen last because her emphasis on "strengthening consequences for repeat offenders" and giving more power to law enforcement completely misses the point. This kind of tough-on-crime approach ignores the systemic issues like poverty and lack of social services that cause problems in the first place, and it will only hurt vulnerable communities in Portland, which is the opposite of what we need for true justice. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Mary Dirksen low because her focus on "public safety" and strengthening law enforcement often leads to policies that hurt Black communities. For us, more police and stricter punishments mean more arrests, more profiling, and more of our people being locked up, not safer communities. This approach ignores the systemic issues that cause problems in the first place, which is unacceptable when we are fighting for true justice. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because of her clear stance on fiscal discipline, which is vital for Oregonians. She explicitly states her opposition to new taxes and wasteful government spending, advocating for meaningful tax relief for families and businesses. This aligns with the conservative value of limited government and financial responsibility, which is crucial for reversing the economic struggles and high cost of living that burden our state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because her campaign is rooted in faith and a deep commitment to safeguarding children, which aligns with the sanctity of life and family values. Her dedication to increasing parental involvement in education and her work supporting foster youth are crucial for upholding the family unit, the most important foundation of our society. This directly contrasts with policies that undermine parental authority and the inherent value of every life. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her strong stance on public safety and lower taxes. Families deserve to feel safe in their neighborhoods, and her plan to support law enforcement and strengthen consequences for repeat offenders is crucial for community stability. Furthermore, her focus on meaningful tax relief is vital, as the cost of living and doing business in Oregon has become too high, directly impacting our economic well-being and ability to save for the future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her commitment to faith and parental involvement in education aligns with my core values. She champions curriculum transparency and a focus on foundational learning, which is essential for raising children in accordance with God's word, ensuring our schools teach truth and not progressive ideologies. She also has a history of service, working to combat human trafficking and supporting foster youth, which shows a dedication to protecting the vulnerable in our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their platform focuses on lowering taxes and reducing regulations for businesses. This approach often means less funding for vital public services like education and environmental protection, which are crucial for the collective well-being of our communities and the planet. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Mary Dirksen low because her campaign emphasizes "lower taxes" and "opposing new taxes and excessive regulations," which deeply concerns me. Her platform states she will "pursue meaningful tax relief" and "oppose new taxes and excessive regulations." While fiscal responsibility is important, this approach often cuts into vital public services and environmental protections that are deeply important to keeping Portland livable and equitable. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy prioritizes strengthening law enforcement and increasing consequences for repeat offenders. This directly improves community safety and accountability, which is the most important value for keeping our streets safe in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their focus on tax relief and reining in spending could really hurt essential services that our community relies on. Prioritizing lower taxes over funding critical programs means less support for people who need it most, which goes against my values for a supportive Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform emphasizes lower taxes and reigning in spending, which could lead to cuts in vital public services. For a city like Portland, these services are essential for maintaining quality of life and supporting our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Mary Dirksen last because her platform, as a Republican, emphasizes lower taxes and reduced government spending, which often translates to cuts in vital social programs and environmental protections. This approach would harm our communities by weakening public services and failing to address systemic issues, directly opposing the progressive vision I have for Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy on lower taxes and economic growth directly helps families and businesses in Oregon. She wants to fight wasteful spending and give tax relief, which is very important for people struggling with the high cost of living in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy to oppose new taxes and regulations directly undermines our ability to fund essential public services and protect our environment. This stance negatively affects all Oregonians by limiting investments in social programs and infrastructure, contradicting the progressive value of collective well-being and shared responsibility, which is fundamental for a thriving society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her main focus seems to be cutting taxes and regulations for businesses. While economic growth is important, I worry that fewer regulations could mean less protection for workers and that tax cuts might hurt programs that help working families. I need a leader who prioritizes the worker directly, not just business owners. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy to fight new taxes and excessive regulations directly supports local businesses and helps reduce the cost of living for voters. This emphasizes fiscal responsibility and economic stability, which are important values for maintaining Portland's character and ensuring prosperity for families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her campaign priorities completely ignore environmental protection and climate action, which are critical for the health of our state and its residents. Her focus on 'lower taxes' and 'economic growth' without any mention of sustainability or green initiatives shows a lack of understanding of the interconnected challenges we face. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her clear focus on public safety and lower taxes, which are critical for our community. She supports law enforcement and wants stronger consequences for repeat offenders, which is exactly what we need to feel safe in our neighborhoods. She also promises to fight wasteful spending and pursue tax relief, which will help families like mine who are feeling the squeeze of high costs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Mary Dirksen last because her main focus on lowering taxes and reducing regulations often hurts our working families and small businesses. We need leaders who will invest in our communities and support people, not just cut taxes for the wealthy. (0 votes)

State Senate District 20

#1
Mark Meek

Reason I rank this candidate low because his vote on HB 4088, which declares a state policy to protect engagement in gender-affirming treatment, goes against the vital principle of parental control over their children's healthcare decisions. This policy prioritizes state intervention over a parent's right to guide their child's medical care. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because he actively supports policies that protect 'reproductive health care and gender-affirming treatment,' which includes abortion and gender transition procedures. This directly contradicts the sacred value of all human life, especially the unborn, and undermines the traditional family structure, which is foundational to our faith. (4 votes)

Reason I rank Mark Meek low because his voting record shows support for many new taxes, which makes life more expensive for us old timers. We need to keep more of our money, not less. He has voted for tax hikes on things like cell phones, healthcare premiums, and even proposed a new tire tax. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank Mark Meek higher because his legislative record indicates engagement with environmental issues, which is critical for addressing the climate crisis. The Oregon League of Conservation Voters (OLCV) provides an environmental scorecard for his votes, showing his participation in discussions and decisions related to conservation and climate. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy focus on affordable housing directly supports social justice and the equitable distribution of resources, which are fundamental Green values. He understands the struggle of homelessness from his own childhood experience and advocates for building more affordable housing and expanding access to shelters. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Mark Meek high because his legislative record shows a commitment to protecting individual rights and ensuring equitable access to essential services, which aligns with the core humanist value of social justice. For example, he voted yes on HB 4088, which declares the state's policy to protect engagement in reproductive health care and gender-affirming treatment, directly upholding bodily autonomy for Oregonians. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Mark Meek high because he supports policies that directly fight for economic justice by closing the racial homeownership gap. He championed a bill to reform the mortgage interest deduction, taking money from rich folks and second homes to fund programs that help Black families buy homes. This is vital because in Oregon, only about 3 out of 10 Black people own their homes, compared to 6 out of 10 white people, showing a deep unfairness that needs fixing now. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he has shown some willingness to question his own party on high taxes, his overall approach still involves increasing government spending. He eventually supported a transportation bill that raised taxes, which continues to burden families and businesses. We need leaders who consistently stand firm against excessive taxation, upholding the value of individual financial stewardship, not those who compromise on these principles. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his policy to secure funding for the Oregon Health Plan, which is vital for providing affordable healthcare to many Oregonians. His efforts to extend assessments on hospitals and insurers through 2032 are projected to raise over $2 billion, ensuring healthcare access for 1.4 million people, including half of Oregon's children. This directly supports the crucial value of widespread healthcare accessibility and affordability for our community. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Mark Meek highest because he consistently champions affordable housing initiatives, which is vital for equitable communities. His support for legislation to build more affordable housing, duplexes, triplexes, and condominiums directly addresses the housing crisis that impacts so many working families in our community, valuing the fundamental right to safe and accessible shelter. He was also endorsed by the Oregon League of Conservation Voters, showing a commitment to environmental protection. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he supports gun control. He voted to modify firearm permit provisions related to Ballot Measure 114, which severely restricts the right to own guns. This policy directly harms law-abiding citizens' ability to protect themselves, which is a fundamental right. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear policy stance on abortion, which protects and expands access to reproductive healthcare for all. His vote for HB 4088, which officially states Oregon's policy to protect reproductive healthcare, directly supports the critical value of bodily autonomy for individuals in our state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his legislative record focuses on practical issues like housing and worker protections, which benefit the community through secular, evidence-based solutions. This aligns with the importance of supporting policies that improve societal well-being without imposing religious or moralistic viewpoints. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his support for housing legislation that pushes for more duplexes and triplexes. The most important thing for us out here is local control over our land, and these kinds of statewide mandates just undermine our voice and how we want our communities to grow. It feels like more city ideas being forced on us. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong support for immigrant rights, which is vital for our community. Their vote to make sure immigration status is not used as evidence in civil cases protects our neighbors from unfair targeting. This shows a deep commitment to justice and dignity for all, which is the most important value for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his voting record shows support for tax increases and new fees, such as hikes on cell phones and healthcare premiums. While he sometimes pushes back on specific tax proposals, his overall history demonstrates a willingness to increase the tax burden on residents, which goes against my core value of reducing taxes. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Democrat, his record reflects a willingness to increase taxation and government involvement, even if he sometimes questions the scale. He voted for a transportation bill that included new taxes and fees, and supported blocking federal tax breaks to generate state revenue. This expands government control and contradicts the Libertarian ideal of limited government and individual economic liberty. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his history shows a strong commitment to protecting immigrants and limiting federal immigration enforcement, which is the most important value. He was part of the Oregon Democrats who blocked a bill that would have allowed the Department of Corrections to share immigration information and coordinate with federal authorities regarding felons' release, directly limiting federal immigration intervention. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he consistently votes to protect our environment, which is paramount for the health and future of Oregon. For example, he supported repealing the sunset on the moratorium for oil, gas, and sulfur leasing in our territorial sea, safeguarding our coast from corporate exploitation. This action directly protects our natural spaces, a core value for Portland residents, by limiting damaging industrial activity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he has shown some moderation by opposing a transportation bill with gas tax hikes, his overall approach to fiscal policy is not as aggressively focused on broad tax reduction as I prefer. His party's general platform often supports policies that can lead to increased taxation, which directly impacts my wealth and the overall economic landscape for high-income residents, making economic freedom a lower priority. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because, despite recognizing affordability as an issue, he has supported 'tax modernization' and once gave a 'qualified yes' to a sales tax. While he reportedly expressed concerns about some large tax increases, his general approach to funding state initiatives through new or revised taxes suggests a willingness to increase the overall tax burden on Oregonians, which fuels inflation and makes living in Portland more expensive. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his approach to economic policy, while having some positive aspects for business, is less consistently focused on broad tax reduction compared to his opponent. He has supported some tax modernizations, such as a commercial activity tax in the past, and voted against fully disconnecting Oregon's tax code from federal tax cuts that would have benefited businesses. While he has advocated for some business tax relief, his overall record indicates a more mixed approach to taxation that might not consistently prioritize the direct growth of the stock market through lower corporate burdens. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he champions investments in schools and healthcare, his general approach to state spending and economic development does not adequately address the urgent need for fiscal restraint. Many families in our community are burdened by rising costs and taxes, and it is crucial to have a leader who prioritizes cutting down on spending and avoiding new taxes. His focus on 'significant new investments' without a clear plan to reduce the overall tax burden on citizens makes me concerned about the continued financial strain on hardworking families and small businesses, which is a vital value for our community's prosperity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his active role in advocating for housing bills shows a real commitment to making housing more accessible. In Portland, where rent is insane, this policy directly helps young people and promotes economic justice by ensuring everyone has a basic right to affordable shelter. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because while he's working on housing, I don't see enough new ideas to fix the real problems we face with affordability and homelessness. We need fresh approaches to get people off the streets and bring down our living costs, not just more of the same. He's been part of the system that many feel isn't delivering fast enough, and I value real, tangible change for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Mark Meek second because while he has voted on some good things like healthcare access, he hasn't been strong enough against the constant rise in costs that are pushing working people out of Portland. He did oppose a big transportation tax bill at first, showing concern for cost of living, but we need someone who consistently fights for our wallets. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his history of supporting law enforcement and his focus on accountability. As a former police officer, he understands the need to fund law enforcement and hold violent criminals accountable. His recent call to reform restrictive camping laws also demonstrates a commitment to public safety in our neighborhoods. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because as a Democrat, he generally champions policies that align with creating a more equitable and sustainable Oregon, which is absolutely vital. While he might sometimes push back on party leadership, like his concerns about the transportation bill's impact on residents, this shows a dedication to his constituents' financial well-being, which is a key progressive value of ensuring economic justice for working families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because despite his work on housing, the cost of living, including rental costs, continues to outpace wages, meaning his approach hasn't brought enough direct financial relief to middle-income families. My priority is seeing tangible improvements in affordability, and the ongoing struggle shows more needs to be done. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his Democratic Party affiliation goes against my core conservative values, despite some moderate stances he has taken. As a Democrat, he is inherently aligned with policies that have led to Oregon being one of the highest-taxed states, hurting working families and small businesses, even if he occasionally opposes specific tax hikes. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy on affordable housing, like supporting rent control and encouraging condo construction, directly helps students and young people deal with Portland's ridiculously high living costs. This shows he understands the need for economic justice for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he fights against higher taxes and works to make housing cheaper. He voted against a big transportation bill that would have raised gas taxes, which means more money in my pocket for food and rent. This shows he cares about the high cost of living for people like me, which is the most important thing. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his support for new taxes and fees directly burdens families and small businesses in our community, making it harder for us to prosper. Fiscal stability is a fundamental value for the long-term strength and security of our institutions, and continually increasing the cost of living through taxes on things like cell phones and healthcare premiums undermines this crucial stability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because of his clear commitment to expanding housing options and access to healthcare, which are vital for a thriving, equitable community in Oregon. His legislative efforts to spur the construction of diverse housing types directly addresses the affordability crisis, a top concern for working families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Mark Meek lower because, while he has worked on housing and economic development, his focus does not strongly address the critical need for strict public safety measures and substantial tax relief. Our community needs leaders who prioritize immediate action against crime and the high cost of living, which he has not emphasized as strongly compared to other candidates. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because, as a Democrat, his party's policies often lead to increased taxes and unchecked urban development. While he sometimes shows independence, his support for legislation to spur construction of duplexes, triplexes, and condominiums worries me because it could change the character of our neighborhoods and affect property values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Mark Meek high because his Democratic platform supports vital investments in social services like schools and healthcare, which are crucial for strengthening our urban communities. His focus on reducing homelessness and expanding access to care reflects a commitment to social equity, a value I prioritize greatly for the well-being of all Portlanders. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because, while he represents our district as a Democrat, his willingness to compromise on major issues like the transportation bill, which would have brought in much-needed funds, shows a lack of decisive action. I care deeply about our infrastructure and the future of our state, and seeing a bill die because of internal party disagreements, even if for fiscal prudence, does not inspire confidence when we face such urgent challenges. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Mark Meek lower because he played both sides on a bill that would help striking workers. He sponsored a bill to give unemployment benefits to workers on strike, but then he turned around and voted against it. This kind of mixed message on supporting working people makes it tough to trust him when it really matters. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Mark Meek lower because while he talks about public safety, his broader policy approach, as a Democrat, often aligns with the kind of governance that has led to our current struggles with high taxes and unchecked issues. He previously voted against reforming restrictive laws that hinder addressing homelessness, showing a less decisive stance on issues critical to the city's well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his history of working to eliminate congestion pricing mandates for I-205 tolling. This is important for us suburban residents who rely on that freeway every day, as it helps to keep our commuting costs down and maintains efficient travel. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while his experience as a small business owner and veteran is noted, his policy focus appears to be more on general economic concerns and governance rather than explicitly addressing the urgent need for upholding traditional moral values and strengthening the spiritual well-being of the community. A strong society requires leaders who prioritize the moral foundation of our shared existence. (0 votes)
#2
Michele Stroh

Reason I rank Michele Stroh lower because her stance as a 'No Gas Tax Candidate' directly opposes a key strategy for fighting climate change, which is the most critical issue facing us. A gas tax is essential to discourage fossil fuel use and raise money for clean energy projects, making her position harmful to climate action. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because she champions the protection of innocent children by opposing gender-affirming surgeries for minors, which is crucial for upholding God's design for human life and safeguarding the family. Her commitment ensures that children are not subjected to irreversible decisions that defy natural law. (4 votes)

Reason I rank Michele Stroh highest because she gets it when it comes to taxes. She's a "No Gas Tax Candidate" and wants to stop all the endless taxes that make it so hard for regular folks like me to get by. Keeping more money in my pocket and out of the government's hands is the most important thing for my family right now. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because she has publicly opposed gender-affirming care for minor children, arguing against medical decisions made by individuals and their families. This stance undermines bodily autonomy and parental rights, conflicting with the crucial value of secular governance where personal medical choices should not be dictated by moralistic state interference. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Michele Stroh low because her focus on 'fully funding law enforcement' and pushing for 'consequences for lawlessness' directly harms our community. We know that more police and harsher penalties often mean more Black people in jail, which tears apart families and stops us from getting ahead. We need solutions that address the root causes of problems, not just more police power, especially when the system is already set against us. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Michele Stroh low because her policy proposals on drug addiction prioritize punitive measures over harm reduction and compassionate treatment, which conflicts with the humanist value of promoting human well-being through evidence-based approaches. She advocates for recriminalizing hard drugs as a Class A misdemeanor, believing current laws are too lenient, which could increase incarceration rather than address the root causes of addiction. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her strong stance as the 'No Gas Tax Candidate' directly undermines the crucial value of environmental sustainability. Promoting policies that reduce the cost of fossil fuels goes against the urgent need to address climate change and transition to cleaner energy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her policy to oppose new gas taxes, which directly affects our daily commutes and household budgets. For suburban residents, keeping more money in our pockets is a top priority, and her stance on fiscal responsibility would help prevent further financial strain. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Michele Stroh high because she strongly opposes new taxes and believes in fiscal responsibility. This is important for old residents like me who are on a fixed income and worry about the rising cost of living in Portland. She states she is the “No Gas Tax Candidate” and wants to stop endless taxes. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she does not actively promote gun control measures. Her focus on restoring general public safety and fully funding law enforcement is important, as a safe community allows responsible gun owners to exercise their Second Amendment rights without fear of further restrictions. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her position on gender-affirming care directly opposes the protection of gender rights, which is my most important value. She has publicly stated opposition to gender reaffirmation surgeries for minors, arguing they are irreversible and should not be a decision for young people. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Michele Stroh first because her clear stance against new taxes, especially the gas tax, directly helps me afford to live and work in Portland. The cost of living here is outrageous, and any policy that keeps more money in my pocket, like stopping increased taxes, is the most important thing for my family and me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her campaign does not address abortion rights, and her focus on other issues like public safety and fiscal responsibility does not prioritize the essential value of reproductive freedom. A candidate who doesn't explicitly support abortion access is not acceptable for me as a single-issue voter. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her clear stance against new taxes and her focus on fiscal responsibility directly addresses the crushing burden of inflation on Portland families. She believes that endless taxes hurt working people and small businesses, and she champions a 'No Gas Tax' policy, which would keep our costs lower. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform does not clearly address immigration policies, which is my only concern. While she emphasizes public safety and fully funding law enforcement, these general statements do not provide a specific stance on protecting immigrants or limiting federal enforcement, leaving her position unclear on this vital issue. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Michele Stroh high because of her clear and strong dedication to public safety, especially in combating the fentanyl crisis. Her personal experience and proactive work to educate our community and address drug issues demonstrate a deep commitment to protecting our children and ensuring a safe environment, which is the most important foundation for any family. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her clear commitment to fiscal responsibility and her strong stance against tax increases. Her promise to be the "No Gas Tax Candidate" and her belief that high taxes are driving people out of Oregon directly support the core Libertarian value of reducing the government's financial burden on citizens, which is crucial for economic freedom. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her commitment to fiscal responsibility and lower taxes. Her "No Gas Tax Candidate" stance and her critique of Oregon being the 4th highest taxed state would prevent additional financial burdens on high-income residents and foster an environment where our investments and businesses can thrive, which is essential for preserving and growing wealth. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her commitment to restoring public safety and addressing the drug crisis directly protects the well-being of our community. It is essential that our leaders prioritize a safe environment where families can thrive without fear of lawlessness, and her focus on recriminalizing hard drugs as a Class A misdemeanor shows she is serious about creating a secure environment for all residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her stated policies do not prioritize expanding comprehensive healthcare access or affordability for all Oregonians. While she addresses important issues like the drug crisis, her opposition to what she calls 'endless taxes' and 'another non profit government agency' in healthcare suggests she may not support the broad, publicly-funded initiatives that are essential for universal healthcare access in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her deep commitment to restoring public safety and her strong opposition to drug decriminalization directly address the critical need for upholding dharma, or righteous conduct, and maintaining moral order in our community. Her personal experience with the tragic loss of her son to fentanyl underscores her dedication to protecting families and children from harmful influences, which is vital for a spiritually strong society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she really gets that taxes are too high and hurting working families. Her promise to fight against more gas taxes and stop endless tax hikes is vital for our wallets, showing she values fiscal responsibility, which is crucial when everything costs so much here. Her tough stand on public safety and drug issues, especially fentanyl, also means she's ready to tackle the chaos we see on our streets, making our neighborhoods safer for everyone. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Michele Stroh lowest because her policy positions, such as wanting to amend Measure 110 and being a 'No Gas Tax Candidate,' go against core progressive values. Her stance on Measure 110 indicates a preference for carceral approaches over public health solutions for addiction, which disproportionately harms marginalized communities. Her opposition to the gas tax also undermines vital funding for public infrastructure and climate action, which are essential for a sustainable and equitable future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her clear stance on reducing taxes and fostering a business-friendly environment directly supports corporate profitability and investor confidence. She states that Oregon is the 4th highest taxed state and that this burden is causing businesses to leave, which negatively impacts the state's economy and potential stock market investments. Her commitment to fiscal responsibility and avoiding new taxes will help businesses thrive, leading to better stock market performance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her stance on fiscal responsibility, especially her opposition to new taxes like a gas tax, directly helps working families and small businesses keep more of their hard-earned money. Many families, including ours, are struggling with the high cost of living in Oregon, and it is important to have leaders who prioritize reducing the financial burden on residents rather than increasing it. Stroh's commitment to stopping endless taxes and advocating for a frugal state budget directly supports the value of economic stability and growth for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her focus on fully funding law enforcement and stricter consequences for 'lawlessness' feels out of touch with what Portland actually needs. It prioritizes punitive measures over addressing the root causes of issues like homelessness and drug addiction, which means it will likely hurt vulnerable communities and goes against my value of restorative justice. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her clear and strong policy stance on recriminalizing hard drugs. She directly addresses Measure 110, which has contributed to the drug crisis and increased crime in our community, by advocating for a Class A misdemeanor charge for hard drugs. This shows a commitment to holding criminals accountable and making our streets safer, which is crucial for public safety. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policies fundamentally undermine the core progressive values that are essential for Portland and Oregon. Her opposition to taxes and her stance on public safety that prioritizes punishment over addressing root causes directly threaten our ability to fund crucial social services, combat climate change, and support our most vulnerable communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because she is clearly against new taxes and wants to reduce the tax burden on Oregonians. She states she is the 'No Gas Tax Candidate' and believes Oregon's high taxes are driving families and businesses away, which directly supports my value of lower taxes to keep more money in our pockets and encourage economic growth. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong policy stance against new taxes, directly addressing the rising cost of living that affects working families. Her commitment to being the “No Gas Tax Candidate” shows she understands the financial burden on everyday Oregonians, which is crucial for our economic stability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her strong anti-tax position, like being the 'No Gas Tax Candidate,' worries me because it could cut funding for essential public services and infrastructure that Portland students and the community rely on. This shows a lack of commitment to making sure everyone in the community thrives. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her plan for homelessness is not clear enough. She says the "Housing First" approach hasn't worked, but she doesn't give clear ways to get people into homes quickly. For someone without a stable place to live, we need direct action, and her proposals don't seem to offer that immediate help, which is crucial for survival. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she is outspoken against endless taxes, which is the most important issue for folks out here trying to make ends meet. She directly says she's the 'No Gas Tax Candidate,' which means she gets that we can't afford more burdens. She also wants to stop what she calls 'bad policy perpetuated by our current State Senator,' which gives us hope for less government interference and more common sense. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because her strong opposition to taxes, like the gas tax, directly undermines our ability to fund essential public services and move towards a more sustainable future. Her platform blames 'Portland Democrats' one-party rule' for the state's problems, which shows a fundamental disagreement with the progressive values and collaborative governance that are crucial for our community's well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her strong stand on public safety and fixing Measure 110. Our communities are suffering from rampant drug use, and her push to recriminalize hard drugs as a Class A misdemeanor shows she understands we need real consequences to make our streets safe again and protect our property values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her commitment to fiscal responsibility, which protects the livelihoods of families. She is openly against new gas taxes and other bloated tax bills, which would ease the burden on hardworking people who are trying to live by God's grace and manage their finances wisely. This directly impacts our ability to provide for our families and contribute to our communities without excessive government interference. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Michele Stroh low because her platform, specifically her 'no gas tax' stance and criticism of 'Portland Democrats' one-party rule,' directly threatens our ability to fund essential urban services and progressive initiatives. My most important value is collective investment through progressive taxation to support a thriving, equitable urban environment, and her policies undermine this critical approach. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her fierce, personal commitment to combating the fentanyl crisis, which is devastating our communities and eroding public safety. Her proven leadership in getting Narcan into schools and pushing for statewide education shows a direct and impactful approach to protecting our children, which is the most vital value for ensuring a livability in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong stance on public safety and her clear efforts to protect our children from the dangers of drugs. Her work to amend Measure 110 and recriminalize hard drugs aligns with the crucial Islamic value of preserving life and preventing harm in our community, especially for our youth. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Michele Stroh highest because she offers a clear plan to restore public safety and address the rampant drug crisis. Her personal experience with fentanyl motivates her to advocate for recriminalizing hard drugs as a Class A misdemeanor, which is crucial for bringing back order and protecting our families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy stance on education strongly emphasizes that elected school boards, representing community voters, should choose curriculum. This directly supports the crucial value of parental control in guiding what our children learn in schools. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policies on public safety and taxes don't help our working families and communities. Her focus on fully funding law enforcement and being tough on crime often means less focus on the real issues that affect us, like unfair housing practices and lack of opportunity. We need solutions that lift up everyone, not just more police and less money for vital services. (0 votes)

State Senate District 26

#1
Nicole Bassett

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their deep commitment to a circular economy and sustainable practices, which directly tackles climate change and creates local green jobs. Her work co-founding The Renewal Workshop, which focused on reusing apparel, demonstrates a tangible history of building systems that protect our planet and promote economic justice, a core value for our community's future. (8 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her platform explicitly promotes expanding government control over the economy, increasing taxes for social programs, and strengthening land use regulations. For example, she advocates for "prioritizing a tax system that funds schools" and defending "Oregon's land use laws," which directly conflicts with the crucial values of individual property rights and minimal government interference in the free market. These policies increase the state's power and reduce individual economic freedom. (7 votes)

Reason I rank Nicole Bassett highest because she wants to lower the daily costs that hurt families like mine. She aims to reduce the price of rent, groceries, and medicine, which are our biggest worries. This shows she cares about our struggle to afford basic necessities, which is the most important thing for my financial stability. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her platform focuses on environmental and economic issues without addressing the critical moral issue of the sanctity of life. As a Democrat, her party's platform often supports policies that contradict fundamental moral teachings, which is a serious concern for the well-being of souls and society. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because as a Democrat in Oregon, she is expected to uphold the state's strong protections for abortion access, which is crucial for reproductive freedom. Democrats in Oregon consistently vote to protect abortion rights. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because her focus on building an economy that works for all, including creating local jobs and expanding vocational training, is vital for the stability of our community and offers practical paths forward for working families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform focuses on general school funding and other issues, but it lacks any clear commitment to prioritizing parental control in our children's education. Parental authority over their children's upbringing must be explicitly championed. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy prioritizes quality rural healthcare and addressing the rising costs of prescriptions, which directly improves access and affordability for all Oregonians. This focus ensures essential medical care is attainable, a value I consider vital for healthy communities. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong history of advocating for fair wages and tackling corporate greed, which directly helps service workers like me. She helped bring Fair Trade to the apparel industry so workers could earn a living wage, and she wants to address how corporations drive up our rent and grocery prices. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her platform clearly prioritizes tackling the climate crisis with specific plans, which is the most critical issue for our state's future. She proposes investing in renewable energy, wildfire prevention, and protecting vital water resources, demonstrating a strong commitment to environmental sustainability. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her platform focuses entirely on other issues like the economy and climate, completely ignoring the critical importance of immigration policy. Her lack of attention to border security and controlling illegal immigration demonstrates a disregard for my paramount value of maintaining a secure and orderly state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her educational background in Women's Studies shows a foundational understanding of gender equality, which is crucial for advancing women's rights and other gender issues. Her work in fair trade for garment workers also demonstrates a commitment to economic justice, a vital aspect of gender rights that affects many women. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Nicole Bassett high because of her commitment to building a sustainable and equitable economy, as shown by her work in fair trade and creating local jobs with The Renewal Workshop. This directly reflects the Jewish value of Tikkun Olam, which calls on us to actively work to repair the world and ensure economic justice for all, making her a strong advocate for a thriving community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her commitment to building an economy that works for everyone, ensuring good-paying jobs and affordable housing, directly reflects the Islamic value of social and economic justice. It is crucial to prioritize policies that uplift all members of society, not just a select few, and her history of advocating for fair trade practices demonstrates this commitment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her campaign priorities do not mention gun rights, and her general progressive platform as a Democrat implies a likely support for gun control. The Second Amendment guarantees our right to self-defense, which is non-negotiable. Her silence on this critical freedom, coupled with her party affiliation, suggests she would not protect our ability to own firearms. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her platform does not clearly prioritize crime reduction or public safety, which is my main concern. While she focuses on building an economy and keeping communities livable, she lacks specific policies or a strong history related to combating crime directly. For me, direct action on crime is the most important issue, and her platform doesn't address it enough. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Nicole Bassett in the middle because, while her business background and focus on supporting local jobs are appealing for economic stability, her broader platform emphasizes social programs like affordable housing and well-funded schools. This approach, which she states would be funded through the tax system, could lead to increased taxes or regulations that may impact my personal wealth and business investments. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because her economic policies present a mixed bag for the stock market. While she aims to support small businesses and local job creation, her focus on "taking on corporate consolidation" and reducing costs like rent and groceries could lead to increased regulation or taxes on larger corporations. This could negatively impact the profit margins of publicly traded companies, a major concern for investors. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because she acknowledges the struggle with rising costs, which is important for people in Portland. She talks about addressing high rent, groceries, and prescription prices, and aims for an economy that creates local jobs. While she focuses on corporate consolidation and efficiency, her platform also mentions investments and a tax system that funds schools, which could lead to increased government spending if not carefully managed to avoid inflation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong commitment to environmental protection and a circular economy, which is vital for the long-term well-being of all people. Her work in sustainability and fair trade shows a practical approach to creating a more just and sustainable world for everyone, aligning with the humanist value of responsible stewardship of our planet for future generations. For example, she co-founded a company in Cascade Locks that gave apparel a second life, creating local jobs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their policy to build an economy that works for everyone, bringing good-paying local jobs and vocational training to our district. This directly supports economic opportunity and stability, which is essential for families to thrive and build a strong future in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her clear focus on building a local, sustainable economy and protecting our environment. Her history with companies like Patagonia and co-founding The Renewal Workshop shows she actually gets things done, creating jobs by reusing goods. This helps our community thrive while also taking care of the planet, which is super important to me and many folks here in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Nicole Bassett highest because her deep background in sustainability and her clear commitment to a clean energy future perfectly align with the urgent need for environmental action in our state. Her policy focus on investing in wildfire prevention and protecting water resources shows she understands that our planet's health is directly tied to our community's well-being, which is the most critical value for our survival. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform focuses on a "tax system that funds schools," which suggests a willingness to maintain or increase taxes to pay for government programs. As a taxpayer, I believe keeping more of my income is more important than funding additional government spending. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her focus on creating good-paying local jobs and providing vocational training offers real opportunities for economic growth in our communities, which is vital for long-term financial security for working families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her background in leading sustainable businesses shows she truly values a healthy planet, which is vital for our future. She’s all about creating a circular economy, like turning old clothes into new products, which protects our environment by reducing waste. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because she talks about keeping our small towns strong and helping with wildfire prevention, which is important to our safety. However, her talk about modernizing land use laws makes me wonder if she fully supports keeping things as they are, which is vital for our farms and property rights. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her commitment to building an economy that focuses on good-paying local jobs and addressing rising costs like rent and groceries. This directly helps Portlanders like me keep more of our hard-earned money and strengthens our local community, which is crucial for our city's well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong history in environmental sustainability and fair labor, which is critical for the future of our planet and our workers. Her work bringing Fair Trade to the apparel industry shows a deep commitment to social and environmental justice, a core value for Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy on building an economy that works for all, by taking on corporate greed and fighting for affordable housing, directly tackles the deep systemic economic inequality that has held communities back for generations. This focus on economic justice is crucial for creating real change and opportunity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because her experience as a business owner and her plans for creating local jobs and expanding vocational training directly support economic opportunity and self-reliance. This focus on practical skills and local businesses helps our community grow stronger and provides clear paths for our children's future, which is very important for long-term stability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because of her focus on local jobs and defending land use laws, which could help maintain some stability in our area. While her party affiliation is a concern, her experience as a business owner and emphasis on efficiency suggests she might be more practical in her approach to governance, which is important for sensible development without excessive changes. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Nicole Bassett highest because her history of leading fair trade initiatives and building sustainable businesses directly tackles corporate exploitation and promotes ethical production, which is crucial for economic justice and environmental protection. This ensures workers earn a living wage and reduces waste, creating a more equitable and sustainable future for all. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her platform heavily prioritizes environmental sustainability and climate change initiatives, which often lead to more government regulations and higher costs. While stewardship of creation is important, her focus seems to lean more towards secular progressive policies, rather than upholding traditional moral and economic principles that truly strengthen families and communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Nicole Bassett highest because of her strong commitment to environmental sustainability and a circular economy, which is vital for Portland's future. Her work bringing Fair Trade to the apparel industry shows a clear history of prioritizing ethical practices and worker's rights, aligning with values of social justice and economic equity that are deeply important for our urban community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Nicole Bassett high because of her strong commitment to environmental sustainability and her history of promoting fair labor practices. She co-founded The Renewal Workshop, which created local jobs by giving apparel a second life, demonstrating a real-world dedication to a circular economy. This policy aligns with my deep-seated value of environmental stewardship and responsible consumption, which is critical for our planet and future generations. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy focus on environmental sustainability and social equity aligns with a rational, forward-thinking approach to governance. Her background in the circular economy and advocacy for renewable energy demonstrates a commitment to evidence-based solutions for the climate crisis, which is critical for Oregon's future and directly impacts the well-being of all residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her focus on helping small businesses and creating local jobs is a good idea for our economy. I appreciate that she's built businesses right here in Oregon, showing she knows how to get things done outside of politics, which is important for practical solutions to things like rising costs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she talks about bringing good-paying local jobs and vocational training, which is good for our trades and future work. Having solid local jobs and ways to learn new skills is crucial for us to support our families and build a stable future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because her focus on local jobs and supporting small businesses is important for our local economy. A strong economy helps keep our property values up and provides opportunities for our kids, which is a key value for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her commitment to sustainable development and protecting our natural resources, like water, reflects the important value of interconnectedness and responsible stewardship of the earth. Her history of building businesses that focus on sustainability shows a practical approach to community well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while she talks about supporting local jobs and small businesses, her strong focus on environmental sustainability and 'circular economy' could lead to more regulations and higher costs for ordinary working people. We need practical solutions for affordability, not just more green initiatives. (0 votes)
#2
Matthew Favro

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because, while a Democrat, his platform lacks the specific, bold environmental and social justice policies crucial for our community's urgent needs. His general focus on 'equality' and 'financial stability' is a good starting point, but without clear plans for climate action or challenging corporate power, it offers less direct impact for Green values. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough information about his specific policy positions to confidently support him. As a Democrat, and without clear stances on issues like taxes, property rights, or public safety, it's hard to know if he would truly represent the concerns of residents who want limited government and fiscal responsibility. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his stated priorities for equality and financial stability for all Oregonians are important values for a just society. While these goals are commendable, his platform lacks the specific, detailed plans for environmental protection or comprehensive social programs that demonstrate a full commitment to the progressive and secular values important for Portland residents. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because I could not find any public information regarding his stance on climate change or environmental policies. For me, a candidate must have a clear and vocal commitment to addressing the climate crisis, and the absence of such information makes it impossible to fully support their candidacy. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Matthew Favro in the middle because his platform emphasizes bringing more equality and financial stability to everyone. While these are important values, and align with principles of justice and community well-being, his policy proposals lack the specific, detailed action plans that would make him a top choice for addressing the systemic issues facing our community. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because as a Democrat in Oregon, he is expected to support the state's strong abortion rights, which is vital for maintaining reproductive freedom. Oregon Democrats have consistently supported abortion access. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no clear information on his stance on taxes. His silence on tax relief, especially as a Democrat, suggests he is unlikely to prioritize lowering the tax burden on Portland residents, which is my most important concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no available information on his stance regarding parental control in our schools or children's lives. Without a clear public position, he does not demonstrate a commitment to protecting parental authority, which is my most important concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign talks about 'financial stability and freedoms for everyone' but doesn't give many details on how that helps people like me get jobs or deal with everyday costs. I need to see clear plans that directly help working folks, not just broad statements. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough specific information about his policy positions or what he aims to achieve in the State Senate to understand how he would truly address the critical issues of affordability and public safety that are vital to traditional Portland residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because he identifies as a dedicated husband and father of four, which signals a commitment to traditional family values. This is important for strong communities. However, his platform does not explicitly address the sanctity of life, which is a key concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because he emphasizes family, being a dedicated husband and father of four, which is a fundamental value. His opposition to the gas tax shows a concern for the financial burden on working families and a push for fiscal responsibility, which aligns with prudent governance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because I could not find any clear policy statements or history regarding healthcare access, affordability, or universal healthcare in Oregon. Without a defined stance on this essential issue, I cannot determine their commitment to ensuring every resident has the healthcare they need. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his general policy of seeking more equality and financial stability for everyone is a good starting point, showing a basic understanding of fairness. However, his proposals lack the specific, bold actions needed to truly dismantle the systemic barriers that maintain inequality. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign information does not provide any clear stance or policy proposals on immigration, which is the most critical issue for our state. Without a stated commitment to addressing illegal immigration or border security, he fails to address my core value of protecting our community's sovereignty and safety. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because as a Democrat running in Oregon, his general platform statement to bring 'more equality to the American people' suggests a positive leaning towards gender rights. However, he lacks specific policy details or a clear track record on issues like reproductive freedom or LGBTQ+ protections, which are paramount to gender equality. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Matthew Favro in the middle because while he advocates for financial stability and support for small businesses, his opposition to the gas tax shows a lack of commitment to critical climate action and public transit funding, which are essential for a sustainable and equitable Oregon. This position prioritizes individual cost savings over collective environmental responsibility. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because there is no public information about his stance on gun rights. As a Democrat in Oregon, it's concerning that he hasn't made his position clear on an issue as vital as the Second Amendment. The right to keep and bear arms is fundamental, and without a stated commitment to protecting it, I cannot fully trust him to uphold this freedom for all citizens. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because I could not find any specific information about his stance on inflation, government spending, or tax policies. As a single-issue voter, it is crucial to know a candidate's position on these economic matters, especially how they plan to address rising costs that affect us in Portland. Without a clear platform on these issues, I cannot determine his potential impact on combating inflation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is not enough clear information on their specific economic policies to assess their impact on the stock market. As a single-issue voter focused solely on stock market performance, the absence of a defined platform on taxes, business regulation, or economic growth creates too much uncertainty. This lack of transparency makes it impossible to confidently predict any positive effect on my investments. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Matthew Favro last because his platform, which emphasizes promoting "equality" and financial stability for everyone, and prioritizing small businesses over large ones, indicates a potential for policies that could significantly increase the tax burden on high-income earners or implement regulations that hinder larger economic growth. While I appreciate his stance against a gas tax, his overall focus does not align with protecting and growing my personal wealth. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite some rhetoric about freedom, his perspective on societal fears like poverty and healthcare often leads to calls for government intervention and expanded social programs, which inherently diminish individual liberty and expand state control. His statement that "Most Americans live in fear: fear of falling into poverty; fear of getting sick, and not being able to afford care" suggests he sees government as the solution to these issues, rather than individual responsibility and free markets. This directly contradicts the core value of self-reliance and limited government. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, while he is a Democrat, there is less detailed information available on his specific policy proposals for this election. His background as an AT&T Network Engineer and service on a city advisory board are good, but I need to see more concrete plans that directly address the economic and social needs of our diverse communities to rank him higher. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he clearly articulates a vision for financial stability and equality for all people, which aligns with the humanist value of social justice and equitable access to resources. His emphasis on addressing fear related to basic needs like poverty and healthcare demonstrates a compassionate understanding of human suffering and a desire to improve overall societal well-being. He also states that freedom should not infringe on the rights of others. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because while he is running as a Democrat, which generally aligns with my values, there isn't much specific information out there about his policies or what he truly stands for. It's hard to get excited or trust someone when their platform isn't clear, and knowing what a candidate will actually *do* is vital for our community's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he supports financial stability for everyone and wants to help small businesses over big ones, which can mean more local jobs for people like me. He also thinks we need better public transportation so folks in rural areas aren't hit so hard by gas taxes. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Matthew Favro in the middle because he is a Democrat who advocates for more equality and financial stability for everyone, which are important progressive values. While his platform is less detailed than Bassett's on specific environmental and social justice policies, his general stance and his service on a Parks and Trails advisory board indicate a commitment to community welfare. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he wants to help small businesses, his overall platform lacks specific, actionable plans that would significantly ease the immediate financial burden on middle-income families right now, which is the most pressing issue for me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Matthew Favro medium-low because, based on his past political activity as a Democrat, he aligns with the progressive agenda that often seeks to expand government programs for social issues like housing and homelessness. This approach typically leads to more taxes and bloated budgets, which harms fiscal stability and burdens taxpayers. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he talks about bringing more equality to people and helping small businesses, which are good goals for our community. However, he doesn't support a gas tax for infrastructure, which could limit funds for public transit and other eco-friendly projects we really need. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Matthew Favro last because his main ideas about gas taxes and helping small businesses don't directly address my family's most urgent needs. My biggest problem is affording housing and healthcare, and his plans don't focus enough on those basic survival costs for people like me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because I haven't found much about his plans for big issues facing our rural communities, like supporting our farms or keeping government regulations off our backs. His experience is mostly with local parks, which doesn't seem to address the larger economic and land use concerns we face statewide. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his focus on financial stability for everyone and supporting small businesses is important for a thriving Portland. However, his specific plans, like cracking down on vehicle tags for revenue, seem less impactful for systemic change than other candidates' broader economic visions. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his campaign message focuses on bringing more equality and financial stability for everyone, which are important values that can help improve life for working families in Oregon. This broad commitment to economic fairness is a good starting point for progressive change. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is not enough specific information about his policy proposals to understand how he would make our community safer or support our small businesses. While his desire for financial stability for everyone is good, I need to see concrete plans and a clear track record to trust he will deliver on our most important needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Matthew Favro in the middle. As a Democrat, his party affiliation aligns with many of my values, and his experience serving on a city parks and trails advisory board demonstrates a commitment to local community engagement. While his specific policy details are not as extensively outlined, his background suggests a focus on practical contributions to public services. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because his focus on achieving equality and financial stability for all American people aligns with principles of fairness and economic well-being, which are important. However, his policy proposals are less detailed compared to other candidates, making it harder to fully assess his potential impact on the community's most vulnerable. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he wants to help small businesses and oppose gas taxes, his experience is mostly as an engineer and on a local advisory board. I value a strong background in government or proven leadership in complex areas to tackle the big issues facing our state, and his platform doesn't quite show that yet. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while I appreciate his stance against the gas tax, which helps our family budgets, his overall platform doesn't have the clear, strong actions needed to tackle the biggest problems facing our suburbs, like public safety and managing government spending. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he speaks of equality and financial stability, his policy details are not as clear on how he will achieve these for our community. The specific actions a leader takes are very important for the well-being of all people, aligning with the principle of karma, and I need more concrete plans. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Matthew Favro second because his commitment to equality and financial stability for everyone is a good start. His idea to help small businesses over big corporations can help create local opportunities, which is a key part of building a stronger, more equitable community. While his focus on parks is good, I wish he had more concrete plans for bigger systemic changes. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there's not enough clear information on his specific policy stances, especially on critical issues like public safety or economic relief for taxpayers. Without a strong platform, it's hard to know if he'll truly fight for our values. (0 votes)
#3
Jeffrey Helfrich

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong stance on public safety and his proven history in law enforcement. As a retired police sergeant, he understands what it takes to restore order and accountability, which is the most important value to me as a resident of Portland facing rising crime. He notably helped lead the effort to re-criminalize hard drugs after Measure 110, which shows he is serious about tackling drug-related crime. (6 votes)

Reason I rank Jeffrey Helfrich lowest because his history as a police sergeant and his role in re-criminalizing drugs through Measure 110 reforms directly contradicts the progressive values of social justice and humane approaches to public health. This stance on drug policy disproportionately harms marginalized communities and goes against building a truly equitable and compassionate society, which is a core value for Portland. (4 votes)

Reason I rank Jeffrey Helfrich lowest because his strong focus on "re-criminalizing hard drugs" and his opposition to tax increases, like the gas tax, directly contradict the progressive and community-focused approach to addiction and public funding that I believe is crucial for Portland. His emphasis on conservative values, including being pro-life and pro-Second Amendment, is out of step with the inclusive and socially liberal principles important to our urban community. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank Jeffrey Helfrich highest because his consistent stance on fiscal responsibility and tax relief directly protects my financial interests. He has publicly stated that Portland's high tax burden, which can exceed 60% for some, discourages business and community growth, aligning perfectly with my desire for a stable economic environment and minimal personal tax liability. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he is openly pro-life and has stated he would sign any legislation to restrict abortion, which directly threatens reproductive freedom and bodily autonomy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his policies directly conflict with the urgent environmental and social justice needs of our community, such as his opposition to gas taxes and support for 'balanced energy' that often favors fossil fuels. His stance on re-criminalizing drugs also goes against a compassionate, harm-reduction approach, undermining the social equity we strive for in Portland. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his "pro-life" stance directly contradicts the principle of bodily autonomy and the separation of church and state, which are fundamental to a secular society. His push to re-criminalize drugs, while presented as a public safety measure, leans towards punitive approaches rather than the evidence-based, treatment-first solutions that many, including myself, advocate for addressing addiction. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Jeffrey Helfrich low because his focus on re-criminalizing drugs and cutting government spending goes against the progressive values I hold dear for our community. His policy to roll back efforts on drug reform ignores the need for compassionate, public health-focused solutions and would only exacerbate the suffering of vulnerable people in our state. My primary concern is fostering a society that prioritizes care and social support over punitive measures. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy platform emphasizes lowering energy costs by resisting "mandates from Salem." This approach often means opposing essential climate-focused regulations, which would hinder progress on the climate crisis and is not acceptable. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform emphasizes restoring education standards and supporting school choice, which directly strengthens parents' ability to guide their children's education. Protecting parental authority over what children learn is the most important value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his history shows opposition to making affordable healthcare a fundamental right for every Oregonian, citing financial backing concerns. This stance directly undermines the critical value of universal access to care for all residents, which is paramount. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Jeffrey Helfrich highest because his proven record shows he consistently fights for fiscal responsibility and less government interference. He pledges to combat wasteful spending and high taxes, which directly protects hardworking taxpayers and upholds the crucial value of economic liberty. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his strong focus on law and order, like re-criminalizing hard drugs, upholds the crucial value of dharma, which is righteous conduct and social harmony. This focus on maintaining order in communities brings stability for families and promotes a society where people can live peacefully. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy to re-criminalize hard drugs directly reverses Measure 110, which was an attempt to address addiction as a public health issue rather than a criminal one. This approach will only lead to more arrests and disproportionately harm marginalized communities, undermining justice and rehabilitation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Jeffrey Helfrich low because he was accused of using an antisemitic "dog whistle" when he blamed Measure 110's passage on groups funded by George Soros. This kind of rhetoric is deeply concerning and directly undermines the fundamental Jewish value of fighting antisemitism and ensuring a safe, respectful environment for our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his strong focus on public safety and his commitment to lowering taxes, which are essential for our families and small businesses to thrive. His 25 years as a police sergeant shows real experience in keeping our communities safe, which is the most important foundation for a stable life and good business environment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his explicit 'pro-life' stance directly opposes fundamental reproductive rights, a core component of gender equality. Furthermore, his participation in a walkout to protest bills, including those for gender-affirming care, shows a clear opposition to LGBTQ+ gender rights, undermining the autonomy and well-being of a significant part of the community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his history as a Portland Police Sergeant and his efforts to re-criminalize hard drugs directly address my biggest concern about safety in our city. It's important to me that our neighborhoods feel safe, and his experience with law enforcement and pushing for tougher drug laws brings a vital focus on public order to Salem that Portland desperately needs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he clearly states that Oregon should end sanctuary state policies and collaborate with federal law enforcement to deport dangerous criminals. This directly aligns with my most important value of secure borders and upholding the rule of law, which is essential to protect our communities from the negative effects of illegal immigration and drug trafficking. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his emphasis on 'conservative values' and increased funding for law enforcement raises concerns about the potential for policies that could negatively impact marginalized communities and reduce social safety nets. His party's general stance often conflicts with the vital Islamic values of comprehensive social welfare and compassion for the most vulnerable. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy stances, like re-criminalizing drugs and opposing tax increases, go against what I believe our community needs. Sending more people to jail for drug use instead of focusing on treatment won't solve anything, and cutting taxes often means less money for our schools and social services, which are already struggling. We need compassion and investment, not a return to outdated approaches. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he consistently fights against policies that fuel inflation, which directly impacts the cost of living in Portland. He has publicly opposed unnecessary tax increases and bloated government budgets, understanding that excessive government spending makes everything more expensive for families. For example, he voted against bills that would modify state appropriations and approve new fees, showing a clear commitment to fiscal restraint. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because their policy stances directly benefit the stock market by promoting fiscal responsibility and reducing tax burdens. Helfrich consistently fights against unnecessary tax increases and supports policies that make Oregon more affordable, which leaves more capital for businesses to invest and for individuals to put into the market. He also supported exempting wildfire lawsuit awards from corporate and income taxes, which directly boosts corporate profits, a key driver of stock market performance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his strong focus on re-criminalizing drugs and fighting against tax increases, while aiming for affordability, could lead to policies that do not adequately support social programs and community resources crucial for vulnerable populations. My value is a holistic approach to community well-being that balances safety with robust social support systems. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his conservative approach, especially his role in pushing to re-criminalize drugs, completely clashes with the progressive and compassionate solutions Portland needs for social issues. This stance directly harms vulnerable people and moves us backward instead of forward with modern, evidence-based approaches. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent opposition to higher taxes and bloated government budgets, which directly upholds the vital value of fiscal responsibility and limited government. He has publicly stated he "will continue fighting unnecessary tax increases, bloated budgets, and policies that make it harder to live and work in Oregon." This shows he understands the burden of government overspending on individuals and businesses. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform, which includes supporting 'one nation under God' and 'Creator-endowed rights,' conflicts with the humanist value of secularism and evidence-based governance. Promoting religious references in government undermines the separation of church and state, which is crucial for ensuring that policies are made based on reason and universal human rights, not religious dogma. He also led efforts to re-criminalize hard drugs, which often conflicts with harm reduction approaches. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on limited government and tax relief often means cutting public services that help working families. He also voted against a bill that would help collect child support from independent contractors, which doesn't sit right with me when it comes to social responsibility. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he consistently fights against higher taxes. He publicly opposed a proposed $11 billion transportation tax hike, which shows he understands that more taxes hurt working families in Oregon. This commitment to keeping money in our pockets is the most important value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy to fight against unnecessary tax increases will directly help families like mine keep more of our hard-earned money, which is important for maintaining financial stability in a city where everything feels expensive. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his focus on conservative values and limited government would hurt efforts to address climate change and social inequality in Oregon. For example, he explicitly wants to lower energy costs, which often means pushing back against renewable energy mandates important for a sustainable future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jeffrey Helfrich in the middle because he supports building more homes and fighting tax increases to make things more affordable, which could help lower rent. But his focus on putting people in jail for drug use instead of helping them get treatment worries me because many people in my community need help, not punishment, to get back on their feet. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he stands strong for our rural way of life, especially in protecting our farming industry. He pushed for disaster help for cherry farmers, showing he understands the real struggles that affect our local economy and jobs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policies, such as re-criminalizing drugs and emphasizing traditional law enforcement, do not align with the progressive social reforms that many Portlanders value. While public safety is important, his approach conflicts with the community-centered and rehabilitative solutions I believe are essential for our city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy to re-criminalize hard drugs directly contradicts the progressive approach to public health and addiction that many in Portland support. This focus on punitive measures over supportive services harms vulnerable communities and goes against our values of compassion and reform. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jeffrey Helfrich lowest because his consistent opposition to tax increases and energy mandates directly undermines efforts to fund essential social services and transition to renewable energy, which are vital for climate resilience and community well-being in Oregon. His focus on "re-criminalizing hard drugs" is also a step backward for progressive justice reform. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their clear commitment to conservative values, which are vital for our state. He is pro-life and a strong supporter of the Second Amendment, protecting our God-given rights. He also worked to re-criminalize hard drugs, which helps restore order and personal responsibility in our communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he fights against higher taxes and aims to lower energy costs, which directly affects my paycheck and the cost of living. It's important to keep more of my hard-earned money and make sure the bills aren't crushing us, and he has a clear plan to do that. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy to re-criminalize hard drugs after Measure 110 directly addresses the decline in public safety, which is a core value for many traditional Portland residents who want to see order restored in our communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy on reducing crime and supporting law enforcement directly addresses the most important value of personal and community safety. Re-criminalizing hard drugs will help make our neighborhoods safer and protect our families from the disorder we see creeping into other areas. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jeffrey Helfrich last because his focus on re-criminalizing drugs, even with treatment, goes against what I believe is needed for our community. We need solutions that tackle the root causes of addiction and support people, not just put them in jail. Prioritizing law enforcement over community-based solutions does not align with the value of true restorative justice. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy on re-criminalizing hard drugs is crucial for restoring order and accountability in our communities. We need to prioritize personal safety and hold people responsible for their actions, which his stance directly addresses. (0 votes)

State House District 25

#1
Ben Bowman

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear commitment to protecting our environment and promoting bold climate policy. His efforts to ban data centers from shifting energy costs to consumers show a dedication to ecological wisdom and standing up against corporate practices that harm our community and planet, which is vital for a sustainable future. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his progressive social policies, which directly contradict our deeply held religious values and threaten the moral foundations of our community. He is a steadfast defender of "reproductive freedom" and "equality for the LGBTQ+ community," and is openly LGBTQ+. These positions promote immorality and undermine the family structures ordained by our faith, causing great concern for the spiritual well-being of our people. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he is a steadfast defender of reproductive freedom. As House Majority Leader, he joined a legislative workgroup dedicated to protecting abortion access in Oregon and fighting efforts to defund Planned Parenthood, which is crucial for ensuring continued access to vital reproductive healthcare services for all Oregonians. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank Ben Bowman highest because of his proven track record in addressing critical urban issues like housing affordability and improving public transportation infrastructure. His work securing millions for Hall Boulevard safety improvements and supporting investments in housing production directly impacts the daily lives of Portland residents, aligning with the crucial value of efficient, livable urban development. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Ben Bowman first because he stands up for our immigrant families. He said that what federal agencies like ICE are doing is unconstitutional and that people's rights are being violated, which is important for our community's safety and dignity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their policy on protecting our environment and bold climate action, which directly impacts the future for young people. Environmental justice and sustainability are absolutely vital for my generation, and Bowman's commitment shows he gets it. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his role as House Majority Leader within the Democratic caucus, which consistently pushes for stricter gun control measures. This stance directly harms gun owners by limiting their Second Amendment rights, a value I consider essential for personal safety. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on expanding public transportation and promoting high-density housing will destroy the livability of our communities and contribute to rising crime. He supports "investing in our Infrastructure and Expanding Public Transportation" and "Affordable Housing and Homelessness Solutions," which often means light rail and more apartments. This clashes with the value of preserving our community's character and safety, which is vital for families who want a stable and secure place to live, not crowded urban environments that lead to increased problems. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Ben Bowman worst because he supports policies like high-density housing and expanding public transportation. These kinds of urban-focused plans often lead to more government control over land and can make it harder for rural families to maintain their traditional way of life and property rights. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because while he has worked to lower the cost of living by cutting taxes for working families and fighting corporate profiteering in healthcare, these actions address the symptoms of high costs rather than the underlying inflationary pressures caused by government spending and fiscal policy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Ben Bowman first because he truly stands up for working people. He helped pass a law that lets striking workers get unemployment benefits. This is super important because it gives us a real chance to fight for fair wages without losing everything, making things a bit more equal between regular folks and big companies. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his stated opposition to federal immigration enforcement and his support for policies that restrict cooperation with ICE. His focus on protecting immigrant communities, even when federal agencies are trying to enforce immigration laws, undermines the rule of law and the security of our state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his firm support for reproductive freedom and LGBTQ+ equality directly opposes our deeply held biblical family values, which are essential for raising children in accordance with God's word and maintaining a moral society. These stances undermine the foundational principles we believe are vital for our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he is a fierce advocate for gender rights. He has actively worked to protect reproductive freedom by leading efforts to fund Planned Parenthood and ensure access to critical healthcare services for all Oregonians, even when federal funding is threatened. This commitment to safeguarding essential rights is paramount. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his history of supporting record investments in housing and expanding the behavioral health workforce increases government-funded programs and intervention, which undermines the crucial value of fiscal responsibility and individual self-reliance. He focuses on dramatically expanding various government services and infrastructure. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because of his clear focus on making life more affordable for people like me. He helped pass a law that gave a bigger tax credit to working Oregonians, which puts more money in my pocket. He also fought to lower healthcare costs and stop big companies from controlling doctors, which means I might not have to worry as much about huge medical bills. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy platform consistently supports evidence-based solutions for societal issues, such as robust public education and healthcare, which aligns with secular governance. This approach ensures that public policy serves all citizens based on verifiable needs rather than religious doctrine, which is crucial for maintaining a truly secular state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Ben Bowman worst because his policies, while intending to address broad societal issues, involve market interventions that could negatively impact investment and property rights for high-income residents. For example, his support for prohibiting private equity firms from buying single-family homes could restrict investment opportunities and potentially influence property values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his commitment to affordable housing and expanding public transportation, which are vital for Portland's urban growth and sustainability. His support for record investments in housing production helps address the critical need for more homes in our city, and his push for public transit improvements makes our communities more accessible and environmentally friendly. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because while he has supported some measures to address crime, like increasing penalties for fentanyl trafficking and giving police tools for drug dealers, he also focuses on 'violence prevention' and 'behavioral health and addiction treatment'. This approach, while well-intentioned, is not as direct and tough on crime as what is truly needed to restore safety to our streets. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on expanding public transportation and general support for affordable housing solutions could bring more dense development into our quiet neighborhoods. This could increase traffic and fundamentally change the suburban feel and character that we value. While he has worked on safety, the risk of over-urbanization is a primary concern for preserving our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he supported expanding the Earned Income Tax Credit, which cut taxes for some working Oregonians, he is also associated with the Democratic majority that passed a transportation bill with increases to state gas taxes and fees. This indicates a willingness to increase taxes in some areas, which goes against my core value of reducing the overall tax burden on citizens. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their unwavering commitment to protecting our environment and advancing bold climate policies, which is a core value for Portland residents. They have consistently supported initiatives to combat climate change, ensuring a sustainable future for Oregon. This directly benefits our community by safeguarding our natural beauty and promoting a healthier planet, which is paramount. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policies lean towards increased government regulation and intervention in the economy, which can hinder business growth and negatively affect the stock market. While he mentions supporting an effective government for business, his actions like combating corporate profiteering and banning certain private equity activities create uncertainty and potential restrictions for companies. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy work in education, specifically the Early Literacy Success Initiative and bringing the Dolly Parton Imagination Library statewide, directly supports the development and intellectual freedom of all children. This focuses on the crucial humanist value of fostering human flourishing through accessible, evidence-based education, ensuring every child has the opportunity to learn and grow, which is paramount for an informed and capable society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong legislative record in lowering healthcare costs and protecting patient care from corporate influence, which is crucial for ensuring accessible and affordable healthcare for all Oregonians. He actively sponsored and passed bills like SB 951 to ensure doctors, not corporations, control medical decisions and secured funding for essential services like Planned Parenthood, directly benefiting voters by maintaining healthcare independence and access. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong commitment to improving public education, which is crucial for the success of our children and the future of our community. He was a chief sponsor of the Early Literacy Success Initiative, investing $150 million to help young children learn to read effectively. This directly helps families ensure their children get a strong start in life, which is the most important value for our next generation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform supports extensive government intervention and spending across many areas. His backing of 'record investments' in housing and 'millions of dollars' for various programs means more taxes and less individual economic freedom, expanding the state's reach into people's lives instead of empowering them to solve their own problems. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Ben Bowman as the best candidate because he consistently champions environmental protection and bold climate policy, which is incredibly important for the future of our beautiful state. His commitment to protecting our natural spaces and addressing climate change through real action shows he understands what matters to Portlanders. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest due to his steadfast support for 'reproductive freedom' and his efforts to protect and fund organizations like Planned Parenthood. This stance directly opposes the sanctity of human life, which is our most sacred and foundational moral principle. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his support for expanding social programs and increased government spending. This leads to higher taxes and more government control, which undermines individual liberty and economic freedom for citizens. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong commitment to public education, including efforts to make higher education more accessible and support student well-being, which directly benefits students in our community. This reflects the importance of investing in our future workforce and ensuring equal opportunities for all. For example, he championed the Dolly Parton Imagination Library to provide free books to young children, fostering a love for learning from an early age. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong history of supporting public education and promoting safe communities. As a former school board chair, he championed a landmark hate speech policy, which is crucial for protecting our children and fostering an inclusive environment. He also secured millions for safety improvements and supported law enforcement tools to combat drug use, ensuring our neighborhoods are secure. This commitment to robust education and tangible public safety measures directly benefits our community and upholds the vital value of communal well-being and protection. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his policy to expand the Earned Income Tax Credit and combat corporate profiteering in healthcare. This directly helps working families afford necessities and protects them from predatory corporate practices, which is crucial for achieving economic justice and ensuring everyone in our community has a fair shot. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because while he champions public education, his policy priorities seem to lean towards expanding government programs and progressive social agendas. This concerns me because it often leads to higher taxes and spending without enough emphasis on core community safety and fiscal restraint, which I value deeply for our families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy record championing equity and social justice, which is vital for our community's well-being. For example, he has been a steadfast defender of reproductive freedom and LGBTQ+ equality, and also supported expanding the Earned Income Tax Credit to help working families, showing a clear commitment to lifting up all Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear commitment to affordable housing and lowering healthcare costs, which directly helps retirees on fixed incomes. He has supported large investments in housing and worked to reduce the cost of healthcare and prescription drugs, ensuring economic security is a top priority for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear focus on improving public services and addressing community needs. His work on the Early Literacy Success Initiative, directing $150 million to help young children read, shows a real commitment to education, which is vital for our future generations. Ensuring our kids get a good start in school is the most important thing for our community's long-term health and prosperity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policies directly help working families afford a place to live in Portland. He has backed big investments in housing and secured money for affordable housing projects, which means more roofs over heads for people like me. Affordable housing is crucial so we can live where we work without struggling to pay rent or a mortgage. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong focus on improving public education, which is vital for our community's future. His leadership in the Early Literacy Success Initiative, with $150 million allocated, ensures our children get a solid start, and a well-educated populace is crucial for Portland's continued prosperity and social well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on general public education improvements, while important, does not specifically address or strengthen parental control over their children's schooling or curriculum. My most important value is parental authority in education, and his policies don't directly advance this. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform explicitly prioritizes "Protecting our Environment and Bold Climate Policy," showing a clear commitment to addressing the climate crisis. He has stated that Oregon must "combat and build resilience to climate change," which directly aligns with my core value of proactive climate action for a livable future. (0 votes)
#2
Bob Niemeyer

Reason I rank Bob Niemeyer last because his views would make living in Portland even harder. He's against building more high-density housing and against light rail, saying they cause crime. But we desperately need more housing to bring down skyrocketing rents, and good public transportation is essential for getting to work without a car. His ideas would just increase costs and make life tougher for everyone trying to make a living here. (8 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear stance on parental rights in education, which directly supports our families' ability to raise children according to our sacred teachings. He advocates for school choice with vouchers, allowing parents to choose schools that align with their beliefs and explicitly opposes public schools teaching "sex, gender issues, or keeping secrets from their parents." This policy is vital for protecting the moral upbringing of our youth from secular agendas. (8 votes)

Reason I rank Bob Niemeyer lowest due to his strong opposition to high-density housing and public transportation initiatives. His stance, like opposing Hall Boulevard changes because he "hates the construction of apartment buildings", goes against the essential value of sustainable urban growth and accessible city living that Portland needs to thrive and address its housing crisis. (6 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he clearly states that public safety is key and we need to fund our police. This shows he understands that strong law enforcement is the most important thing to stop crime and make our community safe. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his opposition to high-density housing and light rail would harm Portland's livability and transportation needs. These policies would worsen traffic and make it harder to find affordable housing, which is a critical issue for many retirees. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Bob Niemeyer best because his commitment to significantly reducing taxes directly benefits high-income residents. His proposal to limit income tax to a maximum of 8% would substantially preserve personal wealth, which is crucial for continued investment and economic stability in Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he criticizes Oregon's sanctuary laws and believes local and federal law enforcement should work together on immigration issues. This policy would allow for better enforcement against criminal activity, which is important for the safety and security of our communities. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform directly supports lower taxes and reduced government intervention, which is crucial for a thriving stock market. He advocates for cutting government waste and stopping unusual taxes like the carbon tax, which would free up capital for businesses to invest and grow. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear and strong policy protecting the Second Amendment, which is crucial for gun owners. He explicitly opposes any laws that would tax, register, or restrict firearms, ammunition, or accessories, showing his dedication to protecting our right to bear arms for self-defense. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their policy opposing high-density housing and light rail, which would make housing even less affordable and public transportation worse for people like me in Portland. Urban livability and accessibility are critical, and these policies would actively harm our community's future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform actively undermines the core values of ecological wisdom and social justice. His desire to cut the gas tax and his opposition to high-density housing work against sustainable transportation and responsible urban planning, which are crucial for our community's health and future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he directly targets the root causes of inflation by advocating for a smaller government, reduced spending, and lower taxes. His promise to stop wasteful spending and cut taxes, like the gas tax, is crucial for preventing prices from rising further and easing the financial burden on Portland residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their opposition to high-density housing and light rail directly undermines efforts to create a more livable and environmentally friendly Portland. Their stance on these issues would hinder crucial progress in addressing our housing crisis and reducing carbon emissions, which are vital for our city's future and the well-being of its residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he states that healthcare is a necessary part of life and liberty, his primary specific healthcare policy proposal is focused on exempting hospitals and health clinics from property taxes. While this could indirectly affect costs, it is a less direct and comprehensive approach to ensuring affordable and accessible care compared to other candidates' efforts. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite some stated support for no religious qualification for office or appropriation of money for religion, his platform includes references to rights coming from a "Creator" and reliance on "divine Providence." This suggests a worldview that could subtly integrate religious beliefs into public policy, undermining a purely secular approach to governance, which is a core value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform focuses on limiting government regulation and opposing initiatives like highway tolling and light rail, which are crucial for reducing emissions and promoting sustainable transit. His desire to cut the gas tax and reduce government spending on what he calls "un-Constitutional activities" indicates a lack of priority for necessary environmental protection and climate investments. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his questioning of teaching 'sex, gender issues' in schools and advocating for school choice with vouchers undermines the humanist value of inclusive, secular, and comprehensive public education. These stances could lead to a less equitable and less inclusive educational environment, potentially denying students vital information and fostering division rather than understanding, which goes against the humanist goal of a well-rounded education for all. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy on limiting government spending and advocating for financial responsibility is crucial for Oregon's future. He states that he wants to "cut the size of government, cut the waste, and cut spending on un-Constitutional activities," which is essential to stop our tax dollars from being wasted on programs that don't serve the people directly. This aligns with the value of fiscal conservatism, which is paramount for preventing Oregon from spiraling into further debt and ensuring that our money is spent wisely, not on endless government expansion. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his opposition to high-density housing and light rail goes against the needs of a growing city like Portland, hindering affordable living and efficient transportation. This stance makes it harder for working families to find affordable homes and get around easily, which is a key value for community accessibility and economic stability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he consistently advocates for smaller government and lower taxes, which is crucial for individual liberty. He specifically wants to stop the gas tax and cut wasteful spending, allowing people to keep more of their hard-earned money and make their own choices, rather than having the government dictate how resources are used. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Bob Niemeyer as the worst candidate because he actively opposes urban development and public transportation like high-density housing and light rail, claiming they cause crime. This stance is against the kind of progressive, livable city we are trying to build in Portland, and would only make our housing crisis worse by limiting options for people. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he champions school choice with vouchers, which is vital for families to choose education that upholds our moral and religious values. This policy empowers parents to guide their children's upbringing according to their faith, rather than leaving it solely to public institutions. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy to use school vouchers would pull resources from public schools. I believe strong public schools are vital for our community's future and for providing equal opportunities for all children, and diverting funds away from them harms that goal. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his policy to cut the size of government and stop wasteful spending. This is the most important value because unchecked government spending directly leads to higher taxes, which hurts hardworking Oregonians and stifles economic growth for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policies, such as opposing high-density housing and light rail, would hinder efforts to address housing affordability and sustainable transportation in Portland, which are critical issues for residents. This clashes with the value of creating an accessible and environmentally friendly urban environment for everyone. For instance, he openly opposes high-density housing, which is a key strategy for making living in our area more affordable. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his ideas about housing worry me. He doesn't like high-density housing, saying it causes more crime. But we need more affordable places to live in Portland, and often that means building more homes close together. His approach could make it even harder for me and others to find a decent, affordable place to live. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Bob Niemeyer best because he stands for less government regulation, which is crucial for people living in the country. He has said that out-of-control regulation hurts businesses and gives government too much power over our lives, which goes against our values of independence. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policies on education, which advocate for school choice and criticize public school curricula on sex and gender issues, do not align with my priorities for a strong, unified public education system that serves all children. While he emphasizes public safety and smaller government, his approach to education could fragment our community's ability to provide a consistent, inclusive, and high-quality learning environment for everyone. This diverts from the importance of investing in shared public institutions for the greater good of all. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his stated opposition to high-density housing and light rail, claiming they lead to increased crime. This stance actively works against our efforts to create affordable housing options and build a sustainable, accessible public transportation system, which are essential for a thriving and equitable Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their policy against high-density housing and public transportation, which would harm our city's growth and accessibility for all residents. Creating equitable access to housing and transit is vital for a truly inclusive Portland, and his stance would prevent necessary development. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because of his strong support for school choice and parental control over education. I believe a focus on core subjects like reading, writing, and math, rather than social issues, is most important for our children's success, and parents should be able to choose schools that reflect their values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their policies consistently undermine the collective good and essential public services, which are critical for a progressive state. For instance, he openly opposed vital safety improvements on Southwest Hall Boulevard, stating he 'hates the construction of apartment buildings along the road,' which shows a disregard for both public safety and much-needed affordable housing. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he champions parental rights in education through school choice and vouchers, which is crucial for ensuring our children are taught values that align with our faith, not secular ideologies. This protects the moral development of the next generation, a most important value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his strong opposition to high-density housing and light rail directly undermines the progressive urban development our city needs. His belief that these initiatives 'destroy the livability of Tigard' suggests a stance that would hinder Portland's efforts to create affordable, accessible communities and reduce reliance on cars. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policies on reducing government size and opposing common urban development strategies seem too extreme for our community's needs. His view that high-density housing and light rail destroy livability goes against sensible planning for a growing city like Portland, which needs good public transportation and places for people to live. I value practical solutions for community growth, not ideas that could isolate us or worsen our housing problems. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he is against high-density housing and light rail. As a manual worker in Portland, affordable housing and good public transportation are vital for me to get to work and keep living in the city. His views would make it harder for working people to find homes and get around. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy to drastically cut the size of government and oppose necessary infrastructure projects like highway tolling and light rail could harm our city's livability. A functional government and investment in public transportation are important for managing growth and maintaining the quality of life we value in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear policy supporting parental control in education. Their stance on "School Choice with Vouchers" directly empowers parents, which is the most important value, allowing them to choose the best educational environment for their children. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong stance on parental rights in education, which ensures that children are taught values consistent with our traditions. He clearly states that parents know what is best for their children and questions schools teaching about sex and gender issues over core subjects. This protects our children from modern ideologies that contradict our deeply held cultural and religious principles. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Bob Niemeyer last because he works against what our families need for a good life. He is against building apartment buildings, which means less affordable homes for us, and he pushes for school vouchers, which can hurt our public schools that many of our children depend on. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform and endorsements from conservative organizations suggest he would actively work against abortion access. These organizations advocate for restricting abortion and opposing the use of tax dollars for abortion, which would severely limit reproductive healthcare options for people in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy to aggressively cut the size of government and reduce regulations directly champions individual liberty, which is the most important value for me. He believes that people and businesses are facing out-of-control regulations that only increase government control over our lives. (0 votes)

State House District 26

#1
Sue Rieke Smith

Reason I rank Sue Rieke Smith as the best choice because her history of fighting for workers' rights and supporting unions shows she truly cares about people, not just profits. She helped organize a union for nurses, which is so important for making sure working families get fair wages and safe jobs in this city. This commitment to collective power for working people is a core value for our community and is essential for economic justice. (8 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of her support for Measure 114, which severely restricts gun ownership. This policy undermines our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, making it harder for law-abiding citizens to protect themselves. She is listed in legislative documents related to implementing or modifying Measure 114, which includes bans on common magazines and permits to purchase. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because she is endorsed by the Oregon League of Conservation Voters, which shows a commitment to protecting our environment and fighting the climate crisis. This is the most important value for our planet and future generations, and her endorsement demonstrates a clear dedication to ecological wisdom. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because she actively supports policies that weaken our state's ability to enforce stricter immigration rules. Her support for Senate Bill 1538, which prevents schools from discriminating based on immigration status, shows she wants to protect undocumented immigrants in Oregon. This makes it harder to maintain clear immigration boundaries, which is important for the sovereignty of our state and the rule of law. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her main focus on public education and workers' rights means more government spending and rules. We need fewer government programs and more freedom for people to work their own land and businesses without a lot of interference. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her history shows she fights for working people. She helped unionize her workplace, which means she understands the importance of fair wages and safe jobs. Protecting workers' rights is the most important thing for us to have a stable life. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her clear commitment to protecting gender rights. She is actively involved in a legislative group that works to ensure access to abortion care and to protect healthcare providers, which is essential for maintaining bodily autonomy for all Oregonians. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her career is rooted in social justice and building more equitable communities, which often leads to policies that increase government spending and taxes. I value fiscal conservatism, and her approach may not prioritize keeping costs down for suburban taxpayers. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her stated priorities focus on social justice and community support, rather than directly addressing immediate crime enforcement and accountability. While these areas are important, they do not directly align with my primary concern for a strong stance against crime. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her strong focus on expanding social programs and public services, while well-intentioned, often leads to increased government spending and potential tax hikes. This approach could negatively impact the financial stability and investment climate that is vital for high-income residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate best because her history shows she fights for fair wages and good working conditions. As a nurse, she helped people unionize for better pay, which is really important for folks trying to get by and make enough money to live. Fair pay means people can afford rent and food, and that matters most to me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her policy to expand and protect abortion access, which is essential for bodily autonomy and health equity. Her active involvement in a legislative workgroup to safeguard abortion access in Oregon, specifically fighting to protect Planned Parenthood, demonstrates a strong commitment to this value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while her background in education and public health is certainly valuable, her policy priorities, such as strengthening public schools and workers' rights, do not directly address the immediate and pressing need for greater government accountability and controlling the rising cost of living for us older residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her commitment to fostering equitable and inclusive communities directly reflects the Jewish value of Tikkun Olam, which is about actively working to repair and improve the world. This approach, especially when supported by allies who combat antisemitism, strengthens the safety and belonging of all minority groups. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her focus on workers' rights and public services often leads to increased business costs and taxes, which negatively impacts corporate earnings and therefore the stock market. While these policies may have social benefits, they can burden businesses, reducing profitability and making Oregon less attractive for investment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because her stance on taxes is less focused on reduction. While she expressed concern about 'one-off taxes' and future increases in certain areas, her overall platform emphasizes strengthening public services and working families, which often requires continued public funding through taxes. This does not align with a strong anti-tax position. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her history as a public health nurse and educator shows a commitment to evidence-based solutions for societal problems, which is crucial for rational governance that serves all citizens. She has actively worked to improve student outcomes and fought for fair wages, demonstrating a practical approach to human well-being over dogmatic beliefs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Sue Rieke Smith low because her platform promotes policies that increase government involvement in our lives, which I believe hinders individual liberty and fiscal conservatism. Her support for strengthening public education and expanding healthcare often leads to higher taxes and more government control, rather than empowering individuals and families to make their own choices. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong commitment to social justice and public services, which directly supports human flourishing. Her background as a trauma and public health nurse, working with communities impacted by poverty and racial inequities, shows a dedication to improving human well-being for all members of society, prioritizing collective good over individual profit. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her history shows a deep commitment to addressing racial inequities and championing social justice, which is vital for building a truly fair society for everyone. Her work as a public health nurse with those impacted by poverty and racial disparities, and her push for equitable and inclusive communities, proves she understands the root causes of injustice. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform emphasizes strengthening public education and expanding access to affordable healthcare. These goals typically involve increasing government spending, taxes, and regulations, which infringe on individual economic freedom and promote a larger, more intrusive government. She explicitly champions 'strengthening public education' and 'expanding access to affordable healthcare'. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because of her strong history as a trauma and public health nurse, which gives her real-world experience in healthcare. She has actively worked to expand access to affordable healthcare and behavioral health services, which is crucial for our community's well-being. Her background shows a deep understanding and commitment to making sure everyone can get the care they need, which is the most important value to me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her background and stated priorities, such as strengthening public education through a unionized lens and supporting 'equitable and inclusive communities,' do not reflect my deeply held conservative Christian values. Her past efforts to unionize her workplace, as a nurse, suggest a lean towards collective interests over individual liberty, which can lead to policies that undermine the traditional family unit and religious institutions by promoting secular ideologies in schools and public life. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Sue Rieke Smith first because her career and policy priorities directly champion social justice and workers' rights, which are fundamental values for our community. Her history as a nurse who helped unionize her workplace demonstrates a commitment to fair wages and safe conditions for working families, and her focus on public education ensures equitable opportunities for all children. This strong advocacy for collective well-being over individual corporate profit is exactly what we need for a truly inclusive and thriving city. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her history as a nurse fighting for fair wages and safe working conditions shows a deep commitment to social justice and worker empowerment. This directly improves the lives of working families and ensures that all community members have a dignified life, which is a critical value for our community's well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Sue Rieke Smith high because her history shows a strong commitment to public service and social justice, which is vital for building a truly equitable Oregon. For example, she actively helped unionize her workplace as a nurse to fight for fair wages and safe working conditions. This commitment to workers' rights and community well-being directly benefits all Oregonians by ensuring everyone has a fair shot, and it's super important to create a state where people aren't exploited. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her deep commitment to public service, from nursing to education, shows she truly understands the struggles of everyday Oregonians. Her push for strong public schools and protecting workers' rights is exactly what we need to build a truly equitable Portland, valuing collective good over corporate profits. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Sue Rieke Smith highest because she actively fought for fair wages and safe working conditions by helping to unionize her workplace as a nurse. This shows she truly understands the struggles of working people and will champion policies that protect and empower us, which is critical for supporting service workers in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because of her strong history fighting for workers' rights and social justice. As a nurse, she helped unionize her workplace, which shows a real commitment to fair wages and safe conditions for everyone, ensuring that the working class is protected and valued in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while she champions economic development and working families, her stated policies do not specifically target inflation or reducing the cost of living with the directness that I believe is necessary. Her platform focuses more on supporting existing structures rather than actively combating rising prices that hurt our wallets. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because her history in public education and commitment to strengthening public schools are very important for the community. Investing in education helps ensure future opportunities for our children, which is a key long-term value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her history fighting for workers' rights and social justice. She helped unionize her workplace as a nurse, which is critical for making sure people, not corporations, are prioritized in our state. This dedication to collective well-being is super important for an equitable Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her primary focus on strengthening public schools and workers' rights, while generally positive, does not directly address the urgent need for significant tax relief and a more business-friendly environment in Portland. For office workers feeling the constant financial squeeze, other issues take precedence. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Sue Rieke Smith highest because of her strong history of advocating for workers' rights and social justice. Her background as a nurse who helped unionize her workplace shows a deep commitment to ensuring fair wages and safe conditions for all, which is incredibly important for building a truly equitable society in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while her background in education is extensive, her platform's focus on "equitable and inclusive communities" suggests a broader approach that may not prioritize the crucial need for fiscal discipline and individual economic freedom our community urgently needs. We need clear, decisive action to cut costs and bureaucratic hurdles. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her history of advocating for workers' rights and public health demonstrates a deep commitment to social justice, which is a core progressive value. Her efforts to unionize for fair wages directly benefit working families, ensuring economic equity and a stronger social safety net for all Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her career in public health and education shows a deep commitment to social justice and community well-being, which is vital for Oregon. She even helped unionize her workplace, fighting for fair wages and safe conditions for workers. This aligns with my belief that strong public services and workers' rights are the backbone of a fair society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her emphasis on "equitable and inclusive communities" and "social justice" risks undermining the established moral order. These broad terms can often lead to policies that conflict with the sacred teachings and traditional values important for our children and families, which is a great danger to our way of life. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Sue Rieke Smith lower because her focus on expanding government services and policies like allowing play-based learning to count as instructional time in schools does not align with my view of fiscal restraint and a strong academic foundation. I believe we need to prioritize core education and responsible spending over new programs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her policy to prohibit syringe service programs from operating near schools and child care facilities. This directly protects our children and preserves the moral purity and safety of our community, which are paramount values for a dharmic society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her history shows she truly stands up for working people and public services. Her work leading unionization efforts as a nurse is proof she fights for fair wages and safe conditions, which is crucial to protect our community from exploitation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her legislative history demonstrates a clear commitment to protecting Oregon's natural resources and supporting initiatives that contribute to a cleaner energy future. Her vote on HB 4134-A shows she values safeguarding wildlife and natural habitats for long-term prosperity, which is vital for addressing climate change. (0 votes)
#2
Stephanie Carkin

Reason I rank Stephanie Carkin low because her focus on reducing "red tape" and opposing "new taxes" threatens essential public services and environmental protections that are crucial for urban residents. While she speaks of "smarter infrastructure," her stance against tolls and new taxes could starve public transit and vital projects, hindering our city's ability to tackle climate change and improve livability. Her business-owner perspective often prioritizes corporate interests over the collective needs of our community, which does not align with our values for a progressive and sustainable Portland. (7 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because she is a business owner and leads the Associated Builders & Contractors. This group often pushes for rules that help bosses, not workers. We manual workers need strong protections, and I worry her policies would weaken them. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy focuses on reducing overregulation and taxes, which directly upholds economic liberty and personal freedom. Less government interference means people keep more of their money and can make their own choices, instead of having bureaucrats dictate how they live and work. She states she will fight for policies that lower the cost of living and reduce red tape to help families and businesses thrive. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy proposals to cut red tape and reduce taxes directly boost business profits, which is the most important factor for stock market growth. Her platform clearly states she will champion policies that support small business growth by cutting overregulation and fighting higher taxes, leading to a stronger economy for investors. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her party's platform strongly prioritizes the protection of society and accountability for criminal actions. This focus on strong public safety measures is essential for making our community safer and holding offenders responsible. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her public platform does not address gender rights, reproductive healthcare, or gender-affirming care. My primary concern is the protection and expansion of these vital rights, and her stated priorities do not reflect this essential value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because as a mom, she says she cares deeply about education and wants to refocus on academics. This focus shows she understands what parents want for their kids and values the family's role in education, which is most important for our children's future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Stephanie Carkin lower because her main focus on cutting red tape for businesses and reducing taxes seems to prioritize corporations over the real needs of working people and our families. We need leaders who understand that 'cost of living' means making sure everyone has affordable housing and good wages, not just making it easier for businesses to profit, especially when she's tied to groups like Associated Builders & Contractors. This focus overlooks the systemic issues that make life hard for many in our community, which is a big concern for economic fairness. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her campaign platform does not prioritize climate change or environmental protection. Her stated focus areas, such as cost of living and small business, do not include any explicit plans or policies to address the urgent climate crisis facing Oregon, which is the most important issue. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her focus on cutting government overreach and reducing the cost of living directly addresses the financial struggles of hardworking families in Oregon. Her commitment to lowering taxes and red tape will help our local businesses thrive, which is crucial for our community's prosperity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Stephanie Carkin as the best choice because she is a strong advocate for fiscal responsibility and reducing government overreach. Her commitment to cutting red tape for small businesses and opposing new taxes will help Oregon families keep more of their hard-earned money, which is essential for a prosperous state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she does not promote any gun control policies. As a Republican, she generally aligns with protecting Second Amendment rights, which is vital for self-defense. Her campaign focuses on economic issues, which means she is less likely to push for laws that take away our right to own firearms. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her platform directly addresses the rising cost of living by promising to fight for policies that reduce red tape and promote responsible budgeting. This focus on cutting overregulation and wasteful spending is crucial for lowering prices for families in Oregon, which is the most important value for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because she clearly states her intention to fight for lower taxes. She directly says that rising taxes are squeezing families and businesses, and she promises to champion policies that reduce these burdens. This commitment to keeping more money in the pockets of hardworking Oregonians is the most important value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her direct focus on lowering the cost of living and reducing government regulations, which is critical for struggling office workers in Portland. The relentless increase in expenses and red tape makes it difficult to thrive here, and her commitment to cutting costs is important for our financial well-being. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policies prioritize business interests and reducing regulations, which often do not address the systemic economic inequalities that disproportionately affect our communities. Her focus on "lowering the cost of living" through less "red tape" misses the point about deeper structural barriers to economic justice. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her clear focus on lowering the cost of living and stopping unfair tolls directly addresses the financial strain many long-time residents, especially those on fixed incomes, are feeling. This emphasis on fiscal responsibility is crucial for ensuring we can all afford to stay in our homes and communities in Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her focus on reducing 'overregulation and taxes' and cutting 'red tape' as a business owner deeply concerns me. This approach often leads to weakening crucial protections for our environment and workers, which I believe are essential for a healthy and equitable Oregon. We need more, not less, oversight to ensure everyone thrives. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because her main focus seems to be on businesses and cutting rules. While lowering the cost of living sounds good, her plan mostly talks about helping businesses by reducing red tape and taxes. For someone like me, what matters is direct help and support, not just hoping that helping businesses will trickle down and fix my struggles with housing and food. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because she has not publicly stated her position on abortion, and as a Republican, there's a strong concern that she would not prioritize or actively work to protect abortion access. Protecting abortion access is the most important value, and a candidate's silence on this issue, especially from a party often associated with restricting abortion rights, is a major red flag. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her focus on helping families afford to live and work here, coupled with her desire to refocus education on academics, aligns with the Catholic value of protecting the family unit and ensuring a sound, moral upbringing for children. Her emphasis on personal responsibility and reducing burdensome regulations helps create an environment where families can thrive according to God's plan. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she has not publicly advocated for policies that expand protections for immigrants in Oregon. Her campaign platform focuses on economic issues like lowering the cost of living and reducing red tape, which means she is not actively working against the goal of stricter immigration enforcement in our state. The absence of such policies is important to me as a voter focused on immigration. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because her platform does not clearly prioritize expanding healthcare access or affordability, which is my main concern. While she focuses on important issues like cost of living and supporting small businesses, there is no specific mention of how she plans to improve healthcare for residents. For me, a candidate must show a direct commitment to making healthcare affordable and available to everyone. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her primary focus on economic issues and government accountability, while generally beneficial, does not explicitly address the crucial need for protecting religious freedom and actively combating antisemitism, which are foundational concerns for the Jewish community. Without a clear stance on these specific protections, her platform does not fully assure the security and well-being of our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her commitment to fiscal responsibility and reducing the burden of taxes on families and businesses aligns with the biblical principle of wise stewardship. This is crucial for our community's prosperity, as rising costs hurt our ability to support our families and churches. She specifically states she will 'fight for policies that lower the cost of living, reduce red tape, and reward hard work so Oregonians can afford to live, work, and raise families here'. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy focus on reducing 'red tape' and avoiding 'new taxes' to help businesses can hinder funding for essential public services and environmental protection. This approach, while aiming for fiscal responsibility, often sacrifices collective well-being and environmental stewardship, which are vital for our community's long-term health and equity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Stephanie Carkin low because her focus on reducing "red tape" and avoiding new taxes could harm vital public services and environmental protections. While she talks about lowering the cost of living, policies that cut regulations often weaken safeguards for our environment and workers, which is not what we need in Portland. For instance, her platform emphasizes reducing "overregulation", which I worry could roll back progress on climate action and social equity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her primary focus on reducing red tape and taxes for businesses, while important to some, does not prioritize the comprehensive social safety net and equitable access to services that are central to a humanist worldview. While she mentions education, her emphasis on cost of living and business regulations takes precedence, which may not adequately address systemic inequalities or support the most vulnerable populations in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her focus on reducing regulation and cutting taxes for businesses feels like a step backward for Portland. We need to invest more in our community, not less, and policies that prioritize business interests over a robust social safety net will only make our affordability and homelessness crises worse, sacrificing our shared future for individual gain. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Stephanie Carkin lower because her focus on reducing "overregulation" and taxes, while presented as beneficial for small businesses, often comes at the expense of crucial worker protections and public services that service workers in Portland rely on to live and thrive. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her focus on reducing regulation and taxes could harm our community. She wants to cut red tape, which often means weakening protections for our environment and workers, and that goes against our core values of protecting our planet and our people. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her policy focus on lowering the cost of living and reducing taxes directly addresses the most pressing financial concerns for families in Portland. This supports the value of economic stability, which is crucial for middle-income residents trying to afford life here. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her focus on cutting 'red tape' and reducing 'overregulation' for businesses seems like it could harm essential environmental protections and community safeguards. We need a representative who prioritizes the planet and people over corporate profits, especially with our climate crisis. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her focus on cutting red tape and stopping new taxes will help our small businesses thrive. It's important for folks out here that the government doesn't get in the way of people making a living, and her plan would mean fewer burdens on us all. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Stephanie Carkin lowest because her platform prioritizes cutting red tape and reducing taxes, which often leads to cuts in vital public services and harms the community. This approach places corporate interests over the collective well-being and necessary investments in our state's infrastructure and social safety nets. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy to reduce red tape and lower the cost of living directly supports small businesses and encourages personal responsibility, which is vital for our community's economic strength. This focus on practical financial relief and individual initiative is the most important value for ensuring families can thrive and build wealth without unnecessary government burdens. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her commitment to reducing regulations and taxes for businesses directly supports a favorable economic climate, which is crucial for protecting investments and maintaining property values in our district. This fiscal responsibility ensures our wealth is not eroded by excessive government spending. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform focuses on reducing "red tape" and opposing new taxes, which often translates to policies that undermine environmental protections and social programs. This approach contradicts the progressive value of collective responsibility and robust public investment needed to address systemic inequalities and climate change in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her primary focus on reducing red tape and supporting small businesses, while not inherently negative, does not strongly address the systemic social justice issues or the need for robust public services that are vital for the well-being of all Oregonians. Her platform emphasizes individual responsibility rather than collective solutions for social equity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Stephanie Carkin highest because her commitment to reducing the cost of living and cutting red tape for small businesses shows she understands what keeps our local economy strong. This focus on fiscal common sense and supporting job creators is essential for our community's prosperity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while her commitment to refocusing on academic fundamentals in education is commendable, her platform does not demonstrate as direct or explicit a commitment to protecting the moral and spiritual environment of our children and community from specific social harms as the other candidate. Strong education is vital, but it must be supported by a clear stance on upholding traditional values and community well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her focus on reducing 'red tape' and opposing new taxes often comes at the expense of vital public services and worker protections. This approach tends to favor corporations over the well-being of our community and the environment. (0 votes)

State House District 27

#1
Tammy Carpenter

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her strong democratic socialist platform that directly tackles the roots of inequality, like demanding universal healthcare and a Renters' Bill of Rights. This focus on ensuring basic human needs like housing and healthcare are rights, not luxuries, is crucial for our community to thrive and address the deep systemic issues we face. She also champions taxing wealthy corporations like Nike and Intel to fund public services, which means the rich finally pay their fair share to uplift everyone else. (8 votes)

Reason I rank Tammy Carpenter lowest because her platform openly promotes democratic socialism, which means giving the government control over essential services like healthcare and housing through policies like a "Universal Health Plan" and a "Renters' Bill of Rights." This approach leads to extreme government overreach, undermines individual property rights, and forces taxpayers to fund programs that erode personal freedom and economic stability. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her platform explicitly promotes universal healthcare that includes abortion and gender-affirming care for all ages, which are grave offenses against God's creation and the natural order. This radical agenda directly undermines the sacred value of human life and family. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong policy to create a Universal Health Plan that would make healthcare free at the point of service. This would greatly reduce the crushing burden of medical bills, premiums, and deductibles on working families, directly addressing a huge cost-of-living issue that impacts our household budget significantly. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her strong commitment to fully funding public services like education and healthcare, and her unwavering support for immigrant communities. Her policy to abolish ICE and uphold sanctuary state laws directly protects vulnerable residents, and this commitment to social justice is the most important value for ensuring everyone in our community can thrive without fear. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her policy to "Abolish ICE" and to make it harder for federal law enforcement to operate directly undermines efforts to combat crime and maintain order, which are crucial for public safety in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform openly calls for taxing ultra-wealthy individuals and corporations and reducing corporate tax breaks. These actions would directly reduce corporate profits and diminish investor capital, which harms the stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her public condemnation of Israel, calling for them to "stop the genocide," goes against my deeply held biblical conviction to support Israel, which is God's chosen nation. This position shows a lack of spiritual understanding and concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because she explicitly supports gender-affirming care as part of universal healthcare and pledges to protect transgender people. This directly advances the fundamental right to bodily autonomy and safety for all genders, which is the most critical value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear policy to include abortion as part of a universal health plan, free at the point of service. This ensures that everyone has equitable access to reproductive healthcare, which is the most important value for bodily autonomy and health freedom. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her plan for a Renters' Bill of Rights would protect me from unfair evictions and help keep my rent from getting too high by linking it to the minimum wage. This would give me much-needed stability and peace of mind when it comes to having a roof over my head. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Tammy Carpenter as the worst candidate because her platform explicitly calls for increased taxes on corporations and the wealthy to fund social programs. This policy directly contradicts the need for lower taxes for Portland residents and would likely lead to a higher overall tax burden in the state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform promotes a Universal Health Plan and a Green New Deal funded by taxing corporations and the wealthy. These policies mean much more government spending and intervention, which I believe will only make inflation worse and increase the cost of living for everyone in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her clear and strong policy on universal healthcare, which is the most important value. She advocates for a Universal Health Plan in Oregon, aiming for medicine to be free at the point of service without bureaucratic red tape, directly addressing affordability and access for all residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because her platform, as a democratic socialist, openly calls for significantly higher taxes on the wealthy and corporations. This policy would directly undermine my financial interests and could negatively impact the overall business climate in Oregon, making it less attractive for investment and economic growth. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Tammy Carpenter lowest because she advocates for abolishing ICE and identifies as a democratic socialist, which undermines national security and promotes a government-controlled economy. This directly threatens the fundamental values of secure borders and free-market capitalism, which are essential for our state's prosperity and safety. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because as a Democratic Socialist, Tammy Carpenter has spoken against 'militarized officers' and 'militarized troops' having weapons, which shows a strong anti-gun stance. This position directly threatens the right to bear arms by advocating for restricting access to firearms, which is completely against my core values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her declared "democratic socialist" policies, such as aggressive wealth redistribution through taxation and calls to abolish ICE, go against the principles of individual enterprise and social order that are important. These extreme policies could disrupt economic stability and community safety, rather than strengthening traditional values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because she openly identifies as a 'democratic socialist' and calls for massive government programs like a 'Universal Health Plan,' 'Renters' Bill of Rights,' and taxing the 'ultra-wealthy.' These policies represent an extreme expansion of government control over personal lives and property, directly opposing the core Libertarian value of individual liberty and free markets. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her unwavering stance on Palestinian liberation, openly condemning the ongoing events in Gaza as genocide. Her courage to speak out on this critical issue, even when facing an investigation for 'anti-Israel activism,' demonstrates a commitment to justice and human rights that is paramount for our community. This value of standing for the oppressed and speaking truth is of utmost importance and she embodies it clearly. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their explicitly democratic socialist platform, which directly addresses the systemic inequalities that plague our society. Their commitment to a Universal Health Plan, funded by taxing the ultra-wealthy, is crucial for ensuring everyone has access to healthcare, which is a fundamental human right, not a privilege. This approach would benefit working families significantly by removing the burden of medical debt and lack of coverage. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her platform, which includes a Renters' Bill of Rights with statewide rent control and taxing large corporations like Nike and Intel, could negatively impact property owners and businesses. This approach risks discouraging economic growth and undermines the private property rights that are fundamental to our community's prosperity. Her campaign website advocates for a Renters' Bill of Rights and states that Nike and Intel should pay their fair share. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her platform directly champions universal human well-being through policies like a Universal Health Plan that includes all necessary care, and fully funded public education from preschool through higher education. This focus on ensuring fundamental human needs are met for everyone, regardless of wealth or status, aligns perfectly with the core humanist value of promoting the welfare and dignity of all people through rational and compassionate action. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her clear commitment to a Green New Deal and taxing huge corporations like Nike and Intel directly tackles climate change and economic inequality, which are crucial for a livable future and fair society. This aligns with the value of environmental justice and shared prosperity, showing she's ready to challenge the system for the people. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy to abolish ICE directly undermines the enforcement of our immigration laws, which is crucial for maintaining national security and the rule of law. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her strong stance on taxing the ultra-wealthy and corporations to fund essential services, which I believe is crucial for addressing the extreme wealth inequality that harms our community. Her commitment to a Universal Health Plan and a Renters' Bill of Rights shows she understands that basic needs like healthcare and housing are human rights, not luxuries, and that's the kind of bold leadership we need in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her platform directly addresses the root causes of economic hardship for service workers, like the need for a Universal Health Plan and a Renters' Bill of Rights, which will provide essential security for our community. This is critical for working-class families struggling with soaring costs in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong commitment to a statewide Renters' Bill of Rights, which would help stabilize housing costs for students and young people. This policy is crucial for promoting housing justice and making sure everyone can afford to live in our community, which is incredibly important for economic equity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her plan for a 'Universal Health Plan' that aims to replace private insurance sounds like a complete government takeover of our healthcare. I value individual choice and freedom in personal decisions, and this policy would remove that choice and lead to massive government control over our health and money. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their unwavering commitment to social justice and human rights, which is a fundamental value. Their policy to end Oregon's investments in actions perceived as war and genocide, specifically mentioning Palestinians, demonstrates a profound dedication to justice for all people, which strongly resonates with my deepest Jewish ethical principles of universal compassion and seeking justice for the oppressed. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her platform directly addresses the core issues affecting working families in Portland, especially with her strong focus on a Renters' Bill of Rights to combat skyrocketing housing costs. Her plan for statewide rent control and tenant protections is essential to keep people housed and prevent more homelessness in our city, which is a critical value for a livable Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because her policy proposals, such as a "Universal Health Plan" and the "Renters' Bill of Rights," advocate for significant government control and increased spending, which I worry will lead to higher taxes and undermine individual property rights and economic freedom. Her call to "Abolish ICE" also conflicts with my strong belief in law and order and secure communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her explicit commitment to a Universal Health Plan, ensuring healthcare is a human right and free at the point of service, which would deeply benefit all Oregonians by promoting true equity and community well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her strong commitment to democratic socialist policies that directly address systemic inequalities, which is crucial for our city. She champions a Renters' Bill of Rights and universal healthcare, which are essential for ensuring housing stability and health access for everyone, especially those struggling in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy vision prioritizes economic and social justice by advocating for wealth redistribution to fund essential services. She believes in taxing the ultra-wealthy and corporations to fully fund schools, guarantee healthcare, and lower housing costs, which is crucial for building a more equitable society for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her plans to greatly increase taxes on corporations and wealthy people could make things too unstable for Portland's economy. While some of her ideas might sound good, the extreme changes she proposes could hurt our city's financial health, and we need stability as we get older. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy to make big corporations and rich people pay more in taxes means more money for our schools, trade programs, and a healthcare plan that covers everyone. This helps manual workers like me directly by making life more affordable and less stressful, which is about ensuring basic economic fairness for those who work hard. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because her policy focus on fully-funded public schools and strong support for education unions suggests a system where the state and educational institutions have primary control over children's education, rather than empowering parents. This approach lessens the crucial value of direct parental guidance and decision-making in schools. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their strong commitment to an Ecosocialist Green New Deal and universal healthcare. This shows a deep understanding that environmental sustainability and social well-being are connected, which is crucial for our community's future and aligns with our core value of ecological wisdom and social justice. They want to shift our economy away from fossil fuels and ensure everyone has healthcare, which benefits all residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her platform, including calls for a 'Renters' Bill of Rights' and 'abolishing ICE,' could negatively impact property owners and public safety in our suburbs. While universal healthcare sounds nice, the idea of taxing the rich for broad social programs concerns me that it could lead to higher taxes for everyone and a less secure community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her strong commitment to defending Oregon's Sanctuary Promise Act and advocating for policies that make it harder for federal immigration officers to operate directly supports our vulnerable immigrant families here in Portland. This ensures our community members can live with dignity and access essential services without constant fear. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because she is a democratic socialist who directly challenges corporate power, like Nike and Intel, advocating for them to pay their fair share to fund essential services such as schools and a Universal Health Plan. This directly addresses the wealth inequality that hurts working people in Portland. (0 votes)
#2
Ashley Hartmeier-Prigg

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her local government history, which shows she understands the daily needs of our community. Her focus on things like affordable housing and government transparency helps make our city stable and livable for long-time residents, which is really important for us old timers. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highly because her work as a Beaverton City Councilor shows concrete action on climate change through the adoption of the Beaverton Climate Action Plan, demonstrating a commitment to reducing emissions at a local level. This proactive approach to climate resilience is a vital step toward a sustainable future. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because she actively supports the strongest abortion protections in Oregon, which is a direct affront to the sanctity of human life. This policy enables the destruction of innocent life, a grave sin that deeply harms our community. (2 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she consistently champions fundamental human rights and progressive social policies that directly impact individual autonomy. Her commitment to defending abortion rights, LGBTQ+ rights, and maintaining Oregon's sanctuary state law is vital for protecting the freedoms and dignity of all residents. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of her explicit support for 'the strongest abortion protections in the country' and 'LGBTQ+ rights.' These positions directly contradict fundamental Islamic social values regarding the sanctity of life and traditional family structures. Adherence to divine law and moral uprightness is a core value, and her policies undermine it. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she supports vital progressive issues like affordable housing and fighting climate change, which are important for our community's well-being. However, her background in corporate product management suggests she might not be as willing to push for the radical changes needed as someone with a more explicitly anti-corporate stance. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because her focus on reducing the cost of living and ensuring affordable housing is important for our community, though her approach to funding it by having the 'ultra-wealthy pay their fair share' could mean higher taxes, which is a concern. Her experience on the Beaverton City Council shows she knows how local government works, which is a strength. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her focus on lowering the cost of living, especially for housing, really matters to manual workers trying to make ends meet in Portland. She also wants the wealthy to pay their fair share. This shows she gets that we need practical help to afford to live here, and her experience on the Beaverton City Council suggests she can actually get things done. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her dedication to affordable housing is a good start for our community. She has a proven track record on the Beaverton City Council, having helped build the city's first permanent shelter, which shows a real effort to address homelessness. However, we need bolder, systemic changes to truly make housing a human right for all, not just incremental fixes. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their strong progressive policies on affordable housing and social equity, which are vital for a thriving and inclusive community. Their history on the Beaverton City Council shows a dedication to improving the lives of local residents and addressing critical needs like housing affordability and climate action, reflecting important values of community support and environmental stewardship. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her support for Oregon's sanctuary state law weakens federal immigration enforcement efforts, which is important for ensuring that our state cooperates with national immigration policies. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she emphasizes community security and has not supported weakening law enforcement, which indicates a commitment to public safety, a vital value for residents concerned about rising crime. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because she commits to defending LGBTQ+ rights and Oregon's strong abortion protections. Her stance shows a clear commitment to protecting gender rights, which is essential for ensuring equal treatment and autonomy for all individuals. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her commitment to protecting Oregon's strong abortion rights, LGBTQ+ rights, and sanctuary state law. These are fundamental values that must be defended against federal threats, ensuring our community remains a safe and inclusive place for all. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their strong commitment to protecting Oregon's existing abortion rights. Their focus on defending the strongest abortion protections in the country is crucial for maintaining current access to reproductive healthcare, which is a vital component of individual liberty. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because she recognizes the rising cost of living, a key inflation symptom, and aims to make things more affordable. However, her plan to have the "ultra-wealthy pay their fair share" to fund family investments might lead to new government programs or taxes that could still fuel inflation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she prioritizes reducing the cost of living and making housing more affordable, which is crucial for working families in Portland. Her focus on ensuring the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share aligns with the value of economic equity, helping to create a more balanced community for everyone. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because as a Democrat and Beaverton City Councilor, Ashley Hartmeier-Prigg's focus on progressive Oregon values suggests she would support gun control measures. Her campaign talks about protecting rights, but does not include gun rights, which for me means she would likely vote to restrict firearm ownership. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she recognizes that inadequate healthcare is a daily struggle and that healthcare costs are unaffordable for many working families. Her policy to make the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share to reduce living costs, including healthcare, aligns with the goal of making healthcare more accessible and affordable for people. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her professional background in product management for large retailers like Nike shows an understanding of business operations. While she supports taxing the wealthy, her focus on economic development and local business stability offers some benefit to the broader market, making her less detrimental than other candidates. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Ashley Hartmeier-Prigg in the middle because while she aims to reduce the cost of living, her plan involves making the 'ultra-wealthy pay their fair share,' implying increased taxes for some. This approach could still lead to higher taxes for businesses and successful individuals, which ultimately affects the entire economy and can impact everyday voters. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because her platform explicitly champions "LGBTQ+ rights" within the context of protecting "Oregon Values," which often translates to school curricula and policies that conflict with parental authority over sensitive topics like gender identity and sexual education. This stance directly challenges the fundamental value of parents' rights to direct their children's moral and social upbringing. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because they consistently champion core progressive values, especially regarding affordable housing and environmental protection. Their dedication to making secure housing a right, not a luxury, by ensuring the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share, is vital for addressing the housing crisis in Portland and protecting vulnerable communities. This is a critical step towards a more equitable and stable Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because her extensive background as a product management director at large companies like Nike and Crate & Barrel demonstrates a practical understanding of business operations. While she supports the 'ultra-wealthy paying their fair share,' her focus on supporting local businesses and her experience on the Beaverton City Council suggest a pragmatic approach to economic issues that could help maintain a stable local economy and property values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because she actively defends crucial human rights, such as robust abortion protections, LGBTQ+ rights, and maintaining Oregon's sanctuary state law, which are vital for protecting marginalized communities and upholding individual autonomy. Her commitment to fighting climate change and increasing affordable housing also reflects a strong dedication to a sustainable and equitable future for all residents, aligning with humanist principles of social justice and environmental stewardship. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because while she talks about community needs, she believes government should provide a lot of solutions like 'secure, affordable housing as a right' and taxing the 'ultra-wealthy.' This expands government's role, which goes against limiting government intervention. However, she does not advocate for outright socialist policies, making her less of a threat to individual freedom than other candidates. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because of her clear focus on making housing affordable and taking action on climate change, which are critical issues for Portland. As a Beaverton City Councilor, she's shown she can work within local government to push for these progressive goals, like supporting affordable housing initiatives. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because she supports reducing the cost of living and ensuring the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share, which is important for working families, and she has experience on the Beaverton City Council. However, her proposals seem less focused on the systemic change I believe is necessary to truly uplift service workers. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Ashley Hartmeier-Prigg in the middle because, while a Democrat, her platform focuses on issues like reducing the cost of living for working families. This shows some acknowledgment of financial struggles, which is a necessary value for voters, even if her proposed solutions are not ideal. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she champions bold action on climate change, which is essential for our planet's future and directly impacts the air quality and environment for young people in Oregon. Her commitment to protecting our environment shows a dedication to the long-term well-being of the community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she talks about making affordable housing a right and reducing the cost of living, which are important to me. Her experience on the Beaverton City Council shows she cares about our community, but her plans are not as clear or specific as other candidates for immediate help with housing and healthcare. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because while she talks about reducing the cost of living, her plan to make the 'ultra-wealthy pay their fair share' sounds like it will lead to more government programs and bigger taxes on everyone later. I value self-sufficiency, and policies that expand government's reach into our wallets often undermine that. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she has a clear commitment to affordable housing and protecting key Oregon values like climate action and LGBTQ+ rights, which are important to me. Her experience as a Beaverton City Councilor shows she understands local governance, and her promise to make the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share aligns with the need for a more equitable economy in our state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because her experience as a Beaverton City Councilor and her business background show practical leadership in local government and the economy, which are important for our community's well-being. Her commitment to reducing the cost of living demonstrates a concern for affordability, a key issue for all families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her focus on making secure, affordable housing a right and ensuring the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share, which would improve economic justice for working families and stabilize our communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while she desires community improvements, her strong backing of the strongest abortion protections in Oregon goes directly against the sanctity of life, a fundamental principle given to us by God. This undermines the value of every individual life. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because she supports important progressive values like affordable housing and protecting our sanctuary state law. While her background in corporate product management is concerning to me, her commitment to increasing government transparency and ensuring the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share shows a step in the right direction for our community's needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because she focuses on reducing the cost of living and increasing government transparency, which are important practical concerns for our community. Her history as a Beaverton City Councilor shows she understands local issues and works towards solutions for everyday problems like housing affordability. She states that secure, affordable housing should be a right and that she will work to reduce the cost of living for working families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their stated commitment to fighting climate change and advocating for affordable housing. These are important steps toward a sustainable and equitable community. Their work on the Beaverton City Council, where environmental sustainability became a priority, shows some dedication to our values, but their platform is less comprehensive on these issues than my top choice. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because while her commitment to community well-being and affordable housing is good, her strong promotion of certain progressive social values like expansive LGBTQ+ rights and abortion protections might not fully align with traditional Hindu family values. However, her experience on the Beaverton City Council shows she can work within the local community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she strongly supports making affordable housing a right and wants to ensure the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share to reduce the cost of living. This is crucial for working families in Portland struggling with high rents and daily expenses, allowing them to invest in their futures and our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because she supports protecting Oregon's progressive values like abortion rights, LGBTQ+ rights, and our sanctuary state law, which are important to me. She also believes the ultra-wealthy should pay their fair share to reduce the cost of living. (0 votes)
#3
G. Mark Norman

Reason I rank this candidate low because his primary focus on tax reduction and cutting government spending directly undermines the funding needed for vital social programs and public services that benefit working families and vulnerable communities in Oregon. This approach hurts the very people who need support the most. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his commitment to reducing taxes and cutting government spending is essential for our financial freedom. Less government interference and lower taxes mean we keep more of our own money, which is the most important value for allowing people to manage their own lives and property. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his top priority is tax reduction and cutting regulations, which would only benefit corporations and the wealthy while starving our public services. This approach completely ignores the need for strong social safety nets, environmental protections, and robust public funding that are vital for our community's well-being in Portland. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his main focus is on cutting taxes and reducing government spending. For someone like me, who struggles every day, tax cuts usually help rich people and big businesses, not families trying to afford groceries and rent. I need real help with basic necessities, not policies that might make things harder by cutting important programs. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his clear policy to reduce taxes and promote fiscal responsibility in government. This approach ensures that hardworking residents keep more of their money and businesses can thrive without excessive burdens, which is crucial for our community's economic stability. He states his number one priority is tax reduction and creating a fiscally responsible government. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because their platform focuses on tax reduction and less regulation for businesses, which would harm essential public services and environmental protections in Oregon. Prioritizing tax cuts, especially for businesses, would inevitably lead to cuts in funding for schools, healthcare, and social programs, undermining the collective well-being of our community, which is unacceptable. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his Republican affiliation and military background suggest a focus on law and order, which is the most important value for restoring safety and tackling crime in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because as a Republican, G. Mark Norman is likely to uphold Second Amendment rights. Republicans generally oppose new gun control laws, which is the most important value to me as a gun owner in Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his commitment to reducing taxes and ensuring fiscal responsibility reflects a wise stewardship of resources, which is a core Christian value. He wants our government to be accountable, not wasteful. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because as a Republican, his party generally advocates for stronger border security and stricter immigration enforcement, which aligns with my core value of upholding legal immigration and national sovereignty. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his top priority is tax reduction and creating a fiscally responsible government. These policies would directly increase corporate profits and investor confidence, which is crucial for a strong stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Republican, their party platform generally opposes abortion access. Without a clear statement to the contrary, this indicates a stance that would undermine reproductive freedom, which is a fundamental human right. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his top priority is tax reduction and fiscal responsibility. This policy directly addresses the root causes of inflation by limiting government spending and reducing the burden on taxpayers, which helps to keep prices stable for everyone. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his platform does not mention gender rights, LGBTQ+ protections, or reproductive healthcare. A lack of focus on these issues means he would likely not champion the critical legislation needed to advance gender equality, which is my primary concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his priority is tax reduction, which often leads to cuts in essential public services that support students and vulnerable communities. Prioritizing tax cuts over robust public funding undermines our collective well-being and the social safety nets that many rely on. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because there is no public information indicating he supports policies that undermine parental control in education. In the absence of direct statements conflicting with parental rights, he represents the least risk to the vital value of parents' authority over their children's upbringing. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he is a Republican, and his platform focuses on fiscal responsibility rather than promoting policies that openly attack the sanctity of life. As a Republican, he is more likely to uphold traditional values important for the protection of all human life, which is the most sacred value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his clear stance on tax reduction and fiscal responsibility, which is crucial for protecting our suburban property values. He wants to lower our taxes by managing budgets well, and that directly helps families like mine keep more of our hard-earned money and keeps our neighborhoods desirable. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no readily available information on his specific healthcare policies or stance regarding human healthcare in Oregon. As a single-issue voter, a candidate's position on healthcare is paramount, and the absence of such information makes it impossible to assess his alignment with my core value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his main goal is to cut taxes and make the government spend less money. This aligns with the vital Libertarian value of economic freedom, ensuring people keep more of their earnings and limiting the government's power to control our wallets. Less taxes mean more individual liberty and personal choice. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his main focus is on tax reduction and cutting regulations, which would hurt our community's ability to fund essential social programs. Prioritizing tax cuts for businesses over investing in public services like education and healthcare undermines the collective well-being of working families in our district. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his focus on tax reduction and fiscal responsibility aligns with the Hindu value of prudent management of resources and supporting individual prosperity. Lowering taxes benefits all families and small businesses, allowing them to thrive and contribute to a strong community economy, which is vital for our future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while cutting taxes sounds good, his plan to reduce government spending and regulations often hurts manual workers by cutting services we depend on. We need strong public services and fair worker protections, and his platform doesn't seem to prioritize these as much as keeping a stable safety net for working families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his stated campaign priorities do not include any mention of climate change or environmental policy, which indicates a lack of focus on the single most critical issue facing our planet and our community. His platform prioritizes other issues like tax reduction and economic growth, which are not relevant to my primary concern as a climate voter. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on tax reduction and deregulation directly undermines the public services and environmental protections necessary for a thriving, evidence-based society. Prioritizing reduced taxes and less regulation for businesses often means less funding for education, healthcare, and climate initiatives, which is detrimental to the well-being of the community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his platform for tax reduction and reducing regulations directly undermines the critical public services and environmental protections our urban community desperately needs. Prioritizing tax cuts for the wealthy over fully funded social programs and environmental initiatives goes against the core values of building a more equitable and sustainable Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his primary focus on tax reduction and deregulation often means less funding for essential public services and social safety nets that are critical for human flourishing and equality. While he mentions improving education, his broader economic approach of prioritizing fiscal responsibility over public investment could undermine the collective well-being and equitable access to resources that humanists value most. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his main focus on tax reduction and supporting small businesses through deregulation does not address the core issues of racial and economic injustice that impact our community. His approach would likely benefit the wealthy and corporations, while social programs that are lifelines for many would be cut. We need leaders who understand that true common sense involves investing in people, not just cutting taxes for those who already have plenty. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his main focus on tax reduction and supporting small businesses often means less funding for public services, like schools and environmental programs, that actually benefit our communities. This approach prioritizes corporate profits over the well-being of residents and our planet, which goes against the value of collective good and social responsibility. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his focus on tax reduction and supporting small businesses through less regulation often means cuts to the vital public services and worker protections that service workers in Portland desperately need. This approach would worsen the struggles of everyday people. (0 votes)

Reason I rank G. Mark Norman as the best candidate because his number one priority is tax reduction, which is crucial for easing the financial strain on Portland residents. His focus on fiscal responsibility means less money taken from our pockets. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while he talks about tax reduction and fiscal responsibility, his platform lacks specific details on how these will directly alleviate the high costs of housing and healthcare that are squeezing middle-income families right now. My priority is concrete relief from rising daily expenses, not just general promises of smaller government. (0 votes)

Reason I rank G. Mark Norman highest because he prioritizes tax reduction and fiscally responsible government. This directly addresses the crushing burden of high costs on Oregonians, aligning with the crucial value of individual financial freedom and responsible governance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their primary focus on tax reduction and fiscal conservatism directly clashes with the urgent need for robust social programs and public investment in our community. Their emphasis on reducing government spending would undermine essential services like education and healthcare, which I believe are fundamental human rights and crucial for supporting vulnerable populations. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his main priority of tax reduction and supporting small businesses through deregulation goes against the crucial need for public investment in our communities. Lowering taxes on the wealthy and removing regulations would hurt vital services like public transit and social programs that many Portlanders rely on, which is a complete opposite of what we need for a thriving, equitable city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because his core policy focus on tax reduction and fiscal responsibility directly supports the economic stability essential for families and small businesses in our community. Lowering taxes ensures more of our hard-earned money stays with us, allowing for greater personal investment and stronger community growth. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because his top priority is tax reduction and fiscal responsibility, which directly protects my wealth and investments. His commitment to strengthening the economy and supporting small businesses would also create a more stable and prosperous environment for my personal and business interests. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because as a Republican, there is no public information available about policies that support universal social programs, strong environmental protections, or economic justice for working families, which are crucial for progressive change in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because as a Republican, he emphasizes fiscal responsibility and tax reduction, aiming to restore common sense to government. This focus on sound financial management and traditional values can bring stability, which is important for supporting families and communities. He represents a more conservative approach to governance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because their platform focuses primarily on tax reduction and supporting small businesses, without clear policies on environmental protection or comprehensive social justice initiatives. This approach does not address the urgent ecological crises or systemic inequalities facing our community, which are the most important values for a livable future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his main focus is on tax reduction and cutting government spending, which often means less money for important social programs and services our community relies on. This approach could make it harder for families in Portland who are already struggling to get the support they need. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his main priority is reducing taxes and promoting fiscal responsibility, which usually means cutting social programs that help our community. This goes against the values of investing in public services and supporting working families in Portland. (0 votes)

State House District 28

#1
Dacia Grayber

Reason I rank this candidate last because she actively promotes policies that restrict gun ownership. She was a chief sponsor of HB 4145, which increases permit fees and extends background check waiting periods, making it harder for law-abiding citizens to exercise their Second Amendment rights. This severely undermines our fundamental right to self-defense. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest due to their strong support for policies like the Reproductive Health & Access to Care bill, which promotes abortion and gender-affirming care. These policies directly contradict the sanctity of life, from conception to natural death, which is the most fundamental value. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because they are a strong supporter of abortion access without restrictions, which is the most important value to me. She explicitly stated her support for a woman's right to choose and co-sponsored HB 2002, a bill dedicated to reproductive health and access to care in Oregon. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank Dacia Grayber first because her policy on affordable housing directly helps people like me in Portland. She supports clear paths from homelessness to stable housing with services and wants to increase affordable homes. This is crucial for service workers who struggle with high rents, and it shows she cares about our community's basic needs. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their support for expansive government programs and restrictions on individual rights. Their platform calls for "record infrastructure, housing, and homelessness investments" and "transformative climate policy," which implies increased taxation and government spending, eroding economic freedom. Additionally, their enthusiastic endorsement of Measure 114, a gun control measure, directly infringes upon the fundamental right to self-defense, which is a cornerstone of individual liberty. (3 votes)

Reason I rank Dacia Grayber lower because her platform, while mentioning accountability, supports continued government spending on areas like climate resilience and K-12 funding, which implies a willingness to maintain or increase taxes. She states that constituents "don't mind paying taxes to improve our community," which does not align with my strong desire for reduced taxation for Portland voters. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong commitment to transformative climate policy, which is essential for our city's future. Her work ensures Oregon leads in environmental protection, directly combating the rising threats of climate change like wildfires and extreme heat that impact all of us. Protecting our planet and ensuring a livable future for everyone is the most important value to uphold. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because she actively champions policies that expand healthcare access for all Oregonians. She supported the 'Healthcare Without Fear Act,' which ensures people can get medical care without fear of immigration enforcement, protecting patient privacy and making hospitals safer for everyone. This shows a clear commitment to universal and accessible healthcare, which is the most important value for voters. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because she supports sanctuary policies that protect illegal immigrants from federal immigration authorities. This undermines the rule of law and puts a burden on local resources, which is a big problem for legal residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong commitment to addressing the climate emergency through policies like carbon taxing and expanding green infrastructure, which is crucial for ecological sustainability and protecting our planet for future generations. For example, Grayber has explicitly stated a commitment to 'aggressively and decisively address our climate emergency by expanding innovative approaches to carbon taxing, decoupling from fossil fuels, and expanding green infrastructure (and therefore green jobs).' (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy platform strongly prioritizes climate resilience and achieving carbon neutrality in Oregon. She has a clear record of pushing for laws to deal with wildfires and climate change, which is vital for protecting our state's future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform emphasizes policies like a 'livable wage' to 'elevate the lives of working families.' While well-intentioned, such mandates can increase business costs, which are often passed on to consumers as higher prices, directly contributing to inflation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy proposals to expand "high-road labor standards" would increase business costs. This reduces corporate profits, which is bad for the stock market and my investments. The value of strong corporate profits is important because it directly drives stock performance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy prioritizes racial justice within the legal system. She commits to holding the criminal justice system accountable so that new laws do not unfairly impact black and other marginalized communities, which is crucial for dismantling oppressive structures in our city. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong commitment to climate resilience and carbon neutrality, which directly protects our community from wildfires and extreme heat. This focus on environmental stewardship and community safety is extremely important to us here in Portland, ensuring a livable future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Dacia Grayber first because of her strong and consistent legislative work on climate change, which is the most urgent issue facing our community. She co-sponsored a $190 million wildfire mitigation bill, which shows she understands the real danger of climate inaction and is taking concrete steps to protect Oregonians and our environment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform supports policies that would hurt taxpayers and individual liberties in Oregon. She advocates for carbon taxing and stricter gun control, which directly goes against my belief in economic freedom and the right to bear arms. These policies increase government burden and infringe on the rights of law-abiding citizens. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform emphasizes "collaborative relationships between parents and schools" and "stronger oversight" of school budgets, which does not grant parents the vital control over their children's education that school choice provides. While collaboration sounds nice, it keeps ultimate decision-making power with the school system, not with parents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Dacia Grayber first because her strong stance on transformative climate policy is critical for our future in Oregon. She's pushing for investments to make us carbon neutral and resilient against extreme weather, which directly protects our environment and Portland from more wildfires and heat waves. This shows she truly values a sustainable future and environmental justice. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Dacia Grayber high because she has actively worked to lower the cost of living and support housing affordability, which is crucial for middle-income families in Portland. For instance, she championed a pilot program for rent assistance to help residents stay in their homes when affordable housing agreements expire. This shows she is fighting to keep people from being priced out, which is a top priority for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their strong support for policies that promote what they call 'accessible paths to work for marginalized communities, LGBTQ+ communities, communities of color, and our immigrant community'. This broad focus on specific groups and modern social issues can be seen as distracting from the core responsibility of upholding traditional family values and community order, which are paramount. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policies prioritize broad progressive social initiatives and extensive climate change measures, which feel like a diversion of taxpayer money from the immediate needs of our established community. Her approach to public safety, focusing on preventing "disproportionate impact" of re-criminalization, suggests less emphasis on strong law enforcement and maintaining order, which is crucial for the safety and stability of our long-term residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong commitment to making Portland more affordable for working individuals and families, which directly impacts office workers. Her policy to fight for livable wages and lower the cost of living, while also securing funding for housing assistance, is crucial for those of us trying to make ends meet in an expensive city. This demonstrates a commitment to economic stability for residents, a value that is extremely important to me as a Portland office worker facing rising costs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Dacia Grayber high because her legislative history shows a strong commitment to improving essential infrastructure and enhancing public safety, which directly protects my property values and ensures a stable environment for my investments in Portland. For example, she has secured significant funding for clean water infrastructure and vital roadside cleanup projects in the district, demonstrating tangible results from tax dollars. The importance of a well-maintained and safe city is crucial for preserving the value of high-end properties and fostering a strong business climate. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their policy to ensure accessible paths to work for marginalized communities and to stand against workplace discrimination. This policy directly benefits diverse communities by promoting fair employment and opportunities, which is crucial for economic equity and prosperity for all residents in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy platform prioritizes the collective well-being and dignity of all Oregonians, which is crucial for human flourishing. Her commitment to affordable housing, accessible healthcare as a human right, and environmental resilience directly supports the foundational needs for a compassionate society. For example, her stated goal to invest in treatment centers and safe rest villages for addiction directly addresses suffering and promotes recovery for vulnerable community members. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong legislative history supporting comprehensive gender rights and access to healthcare. She co-sponsored a bill requiring health insurers to cover fertility treatments, ensuring that critical reproductive healthcare is accessible for Oregonians. This directly impacts the ability of individuals to control their reproductive lives, which is a fundamental value for gender equality. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Dacia Grayber as the worst candidate because her approach to our addiction crisis, focusing on "safe rest villages" and "treatment centers," feels like it just manages the problem instead of truly cleaning up our streets and addressing public safety. We need more immediate action to restore order in our neighborhoods, and her plan doesn't seem to get us there fast enough for the safety of our families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy on public safety workforce stability directly impacts our community's ability to fight crime. She championed a bill that lowers the retirement age for firefighters and police officers, helping keep experienced first responders on the job longer or allowing new ones to join. This makes our streets safer by strengthening our emergency services. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her steadfast commitment to reproductive freedom and aggressive climate action, which are vital for our community. Her history of fighting for reproductive rights and pushing for transformative climate policy ensures that all Oregonians have bodily autonomy and a healthy planet for the future, which are the most important values for a progressive Portlander. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong commitment to fighting the climate crisis, which is the most critical issue facing our generation. She has actively supported transformative policies for climate change mitigation and investments for a carbon-neutral Oregon, showing a real dedication to our planet's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she worked to lower housing costs and expand addiction treatment. Affordable housing and getting help for addiction are big problems in Portland, and her work on these issues shows she cares about people getting a fair shot at a stable life. The value of basic needs being met is most important for survival and well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because she voted against modifying Ballot Measure 114's firearm permit provisions. This means she supported keeping the strict gun control measure as it is, which directly impacts our Second Amendment rights. For rural residents, the right to own firearms for self-defense and hunting is a fundamental liberty that should not be restricted by the government. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her unwavering commitment to public safety and combating extremism, which is paramount for our community's well-being. Her background as a firefighter and paramedic shows a deep dedication to protecting people, and she explicitly states tackling the proliferation of extremism as a priority, ensuring everyone feels safe in their neighborhoods. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while her focus on important issues like climate change and affordable housing is noted, her broad policy platform seems less focused on the immediate, tangible improvements in disciplined education and direct public safety that I prioritize for our families. Her emphasis on diverse initiatives, while valuable, does not address my most urgent concerns for school environments and community order as directly as the other candidate. Supporting public safety partnerships and holding the criminal justice system accountable is important, but a more direct approach to empowering police and maintaining classroom discipline is what I seek. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong commitment to climate action and public transportation, which is vital for a sustainable and livable city. They support investing in progressive infrastructure projects and aiming for carbon neutrality, which directly benefits our urban environment and reduces reliance on cars. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy commitments directly support marginalized communities and immigrants, which is vital for ensuring justice and protection for all people. She actively works to create accessible paths to employment and stands against discrimination in the workplace for these communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while she focuses on big investments in housing and climate, I'm more concerned about how my taxes are spent and seeing clear results. Her pledge for accountable government and ensuring real, tangible results for our tax dollars is important, but I need to see more concrete plans for fiscal responsibility that directly benefit my community without increasing my burden. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Dacia Grayber high because she used to be a union firefighter. She understands what real work is, and that means she'll fight for better jobs and fair wages for people who actually build things. Supporting strong unions and worker rights is the most important thing for our families to thrive in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her commitment to climate resilience aligns with the core value of protecting our natural environment, which is vital for Portland's future. Her work on wildfire mitigation shows a practical approach to keeping our community safe from real threats. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy focus on 'transformative climate policy' feels like a distraction from the immediate and pressing issues impacting our daily lives in the suburbs, such as rising costs and public safety. While climate is important, practical solutions for our community's immediate challenges should be the priority. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy to ensure accessible paths to work for marginalized communities, including immigrant communities, directly supports economic justice. This means our gente can find good jobs without facing discrimination, which is essential for our families to build a stable future here in Portland. (0 votes)
#2
Randall Fryer

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his policy to have money follow the pupil in education. This approach would cripple our public school system by diverting funds, undermining the quality of education for countless students in Portland and across the state. A robust, equitably funded public education system is crucial for a fair society and the well-being of our entire community. (8 votes)

Reason I rank Randall Fryer as the best candidate because he prioritizes keeping property taxes low for folks like me, especially those of us who are retired, so we aren't forced out of our homes. He also believes tolling should only happen if voters approve it directly, which respects our voice and money. Protecting our hard-earned property and ensuring our votes matter on major financial decisions is the most important thing for our community's stability. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their education policy, specifically that money should follow the pupil. This policy ensures parents have a real choice in where their children are educated, including religious schools, which is vital for upholding our family values and the importance of faith-based learning. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy supporting 'money should follow the pupil' threatens the separation of church and state in education. This approach could divert public funds to religious schools, undermining the secular foundation of our public education system and promoting religious indoctrination over evidence-based learning. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his "money should follow the pupil" policy directly empowers parents with school choice, which is the most important value for me as it puts control of children's education firmly in the hands of their families. This gives families the power to decide where their child gets the best education, rather than being limited by district lines. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Randall Fryer highest because he clearly prioritizes lowering the tax burden on Oregonians. He specifically questions why property taxes should force retired middle-class residents out of their homes and believes taxes should be based on Oregon's median income, which would protect many Portland residents from excessive taxation. This focus on tax relief is crucial for the financial well-being of our community. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because there is no public information showing support for policies that encourage illegal immigration in Oregon. This suggests a chance he would prioritize the safety and economic well-being of legal residents, which is important to me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available about their stance on abortion access. As a Republican candidate, it is unlikely they would champion the unrestricted abortion rights that I prioritize, which is crucial for protecting bodily autonomy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available about their stance on climate change or their environmental policies. For a single-issue climate voter, a candidate's silence on this most important issue means they likely won't act to protect our planet. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear focus on appropriate taxation, including tying taxes to the Oregon median income. This policy helps prevent excessive government revenue collection that can lead to wasteful spending and increased inflationary pressures, protecting my purchasing power. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy that 'money should follow the pupil' threatens our public schools. Taking money away from public schools to fund other options can hurt the schools that serve our neighborhoods and the children who need the most support, which is a big concern for community stability. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because, as a Republican, he is likely to uphold Second Amendment rights, which are critical for self-defense. While his platform does not directly mention gun rights, his party affiliation generally indicates support for the right to bear arms, a value essential for protecting our freedom. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy on public safety focuses on funding and honoring police officers, without a clear plan for accountability or addressing racial disparities in policing. This approach does not prioritize the urgent need for systemic change to protect black residents from unequal treatment under the law. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his policy on education, specifically that 'money should follow the pupil,' undermines the crucial progressive value of robust public education. This approach often diverts essential funds from public schools, weakening them and creating inequities that harm our community's most vulnerable students. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign materials do not clearly state specific healthcare policies or a vision for improving healthcare access or affordability for Oregon residents. While he is a retired physician, his platform lacks concrete plans for legislative action on healthcare, which is crucial for voters who prioritize this issue above all else. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because, as a Republican, he is likely to support policies that create a more favorable environment for businesses. This often means lower taxes and fewer regulations, which tend to increase corporate profits and benefit the stock market. The value of a business-friendly environment is important because it directly leads to higher stock valuations. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his public statements and platform lack specific commitments to gender rights or reproductive freedom. While he outlines general policy areas, there is no evidence of his support for the critical issues that ensure equitable access to healthcare and protection for all genders in Oregon. This absence of clear support for gender rights is a significant concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their platform lacks any stated commitment to environmental protection or climate action, which is a critical oversight given the urgent ecological crisis we face in Oregon. A truly responsible leader must prioritize the health of our planet, and Fryer's campaign materials do not mention any environmental policies, which means our land and water will be at risk. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear policy on education, specifically his belief that money should follow the pupil and that teachers should be able to bring order to their classrooms. This approach ensures that funding supports student learning directly and creates a disciplined environment, which is vital for providing our children with the strong academic foundation and respect for authority needed for future success. This value is paramount for our community's future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Randall Fryer low because his policy platform, particularly his stance on property taxes, lacks specific details on how essential public services and infrastructure in high-income areas would be maintained. His proposal to base taxes on Oregon's median income and his questioning of property tax levels, while aiming to protect the 'retired middle class,' could inadvertently jeopardize the funding needed for top-tier services that are paramount for protecting and growing my wealth and property values. A robust, well-funded government is critical for a prosperous city. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their policy that money should follow the pupil in education, not dictate choice. This policy empowers parents to choose schools that best fit their children's needs, which is vital for ensuring children receive the best possible learning environment and helps our community thrive. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Randall Fryer low because his policy of 'money should follow the pupil' for education feels like it would totally undermine our public school system. We need to boost funding and support for public schools for everyone, not divert resources, which is super important for giving all kids in our community a fair shot. This approach compromises the value of strong, equitable public services. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear stance on taxation and education, which directly supports individual liberty. They advocate for taxes to be based on median income and for tolling to require direct voter approval, which respects economic freedom and property rights. This approach limits government's power to seize wealth, allowing individuals to keep more of their earnings and control how public funds are approved, upholding the crucial value of fiscal responsibility and individual economic autonomy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on individualistic policies, like money following the pupil in education, undermines the essential role of robust public institutions in fostering an equitable society. While he mentions serving the people, his approach to taxation, suggesting everyone should have 'skin in the game,' could disproportionately impact lower-income individuals and contradict the humanist value of shared responsibility for collective welfare. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear information about his policies or past actions related to crime or public safety. As a single-issue crime voter, I need to know a candidate's specific plans to address rising crime, and without that, I cannot support him. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policies on education, such as 'money should follow the pupil,' directly threaten our vital public school system. This approach would divert essential funds from our public schools, harming students and educators, and undermining the critical value of a strong, equitably funded public education for all children. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Randall Fryer lower because while his ideas on taxation are appealing, they lack the same level of concrete legislative action or detailed plans that Dacia Grayber has shown. He proposes that property taxes shouldn't force retired middle-class residents out of their homes and that taxes should be based on Oregon's median income, which are important values for financial stability. However, I want to see a clear path to action. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he is running as a Republican for State House District 28. This aligns with my core value of fiscal responsibility and limited government interference, which is crucial for controlling excessive spending in Oregon. His background as a retired physician also suggests a practical approach to problem-solving, which is a strength needed in Salem. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough clear information about his plans to help people struggling with money or housing in Portland. It's hard to trust someone with my vote if I don't know what they stand for on the issues that affect my daily life. Transparency is a key value, especially when basic survival is at stake. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his extensive history as a physician serving in rural and remote emergency departments. This background means he truly understands the critical need for accessible healthcare in our communities, which is a major concern for folks out here. Having someone with practical experience in rural medicine is vital for our well-being and ensures our voices on healthcare are actually heard. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough clear information available about his specific policies or stances. It is impossible to evaluate how he would address the critical issues facing our community, such as public safety or support for vulnerable populations, without a clear platform. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on taxation, while addressing property owners, doesn't seem to directly tackle the broader affordability challenges faced by most office workers in Portland. While he discusses trusting voters and grassroots leadership, his specific policy proposals, such as his approach to property taxes, do not align with the immediate and pressing needs of affordable living for the general working population in the city. My main concern is comprehensive affordability for all workers, which his platform doesn't fully address. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Randall Fryer low because his policy on education, where he suggests "money should follow the pupil," goes against the critical value of supporting our public school system. This approach often siphons funds from public institutions, weakening the foundation of equitable education for all students in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his focus on local control and fiscal responsibility directly protects our community's foundational values and the financial stability of homeowners. His platform emphasizes trusting voters on important decisions like tolling, and he wants to prevent property taxes from pushing out retired middle-class residents, which is essential for preserving the long-term character of our neighborhoods. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their stance on education funding, specifically that 'money should follow the pupil'. This approach often diverts funds from public schools to private options, which can undermine the strength and equity of our community's public education system, a core value for urban residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy on education, where 'money should follow the pupil', could take funds away from our public schools. A strong public education system is a core value in Portland, and diverting resources from it would weaken a vital community institution. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policies focus on general principles like trusting voters and grass-roots leadership, but they lack specific actions or strong support for protecting the most vulnerable and marginalized communities. His platform does not clearly address the specific needs and challenges faced by minority groups in the way that is truly needed for justice to prevail. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his policy on property taxes, which directly protects older voters. He clearly states that property tax levels should not force retired folks out of the homes they worked hard for, and this value of financial security for seniors is very important to me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Randall Fryer low because his background includes software development and he often talks about business interests. People from that world tend to care more about cutting costs than making sure working people get good pay and strong protections. We need someone who will put workers first, not just company profits, to keep our economy strong for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy on education, suggesting money should follow the pupil, could weaken our public schools, which are a cornerstone of community well-being in Portland. Strong public schools are essential for all families, not just those who can choose. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his clear stance on property taxes directly addresses a major financial concern for homeowners, ensuring that retired residents can afford to stay in their homes. This protects the stability and value of our suburban neighborhoods, which is incredibly important for long-term community well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their policy on education, specifically supporting that money should follow the pupil. This policy empowers parents to choose the best schooling for their children, which is important for upholding traditional values and ensuring a strong moral foundation in our community. (0 votes)

State House District 29

#1
Susan McLain

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her strong and consistent legislative history on climate action. She consistently receives high scores from the Oregon League of Conservation Voters, including 95% in 2023-2024, demonstrating her commitment to protecting Oregon's environment and actively working for critical climate solutions. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her clear policy to protect immigrant families in our schools. She co-sponsored House Bill 4079, which aims to make schools safer for children by requiring notification when immigration enforcement is present, a crucial step to reduce fear and disruption in our community. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her voting record clearly shows she supports gun control. She voted for House Bill 4145, which modifies Ballot Measure 114, a law that bans certain magazines and requires permits for gun purchases. This directly threatens the fundamental right to self-defense, which is the most important value for gun owners. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her legislative history in expanding the Earned Income Tax Credit, which directly lowers taxes for working families like mine. This action helps put more money back into our pockets, which is crucial for managing the rising cost of living here in Portland and directly supports our financial well-being. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong advocacy for public transit and bike-pedestrian facilities. As the Chair of the House Transportation Committee, her focus on expanding these crucial non-car options directly improves urban livability and tackles congestion, which is vital for Portland residents like me who prioritize sustainable and efficient ways to move around our city. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her policy supporting strong gun safety measures, which is important for reducing violent crime in Portland. My top priority is crime reduction, and addressing gun violence directly impacts public safety. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Susan McLain lower because her policy priorities are heavily focused on social programs, education, and environmental protection. While these issues have merit, her platform does not emphasize direct economic growth or a business-friendly environment that would strongly boost stock market performance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because of her strong stance on protecting reproductive freedoms and her active role in banning conversion therapy, which directly contradict the sacred Islamic values regarding the sanctity of life and traditional family structures. Her policy actions undermine the moral fabric important to our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her history of working on affordable housing. She supported a bill that looked into the housing crisis and helped get money for homeless shelters. This matters a lot because having a safe, affordable place to live is the most important thing for my family and me to get by and have a chance to improve our lives. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Susan McLain first because her proven leadership on the House Transportation Committee and as Co-Chair of the I-5 Bridge Committee shows she knows how to get big projects done. As an old resident, I value stable and reliable infrastructure, which is important for our daily lives and the future of our city, and her long experience gives me confidence. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her unwavering commitment to reproductive freedom directly protects the bodily autonomy of every person in our state. She has consistently fought to defend Oregon's strong protections for reproductive rights, even against federal threats, which is the most crucial value for empowering women and ensuring our collective liberation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her legislative history and endorsements do not clearly prioritize parental control over school decisions. Her strong support for "reproductive freedoms" and endorsements from groups like Planned Parenthood suggest a focus that may not align with parents who want more direct control over their children's education and health choices. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because she consistently supports policies that aim for universal healthcare access. She championed a resolution to declare healthcare a constitutional right and voted for a task force to design a universal healthcare plan for all Oregon residents, which directly aligns with the most important value of ensuring everyone has access to medical care. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong commitment to environmental protection and sustainable development, which is crucial for our planet and future generations. She has actively worked to preserve farmland and prioritize public transit, bike, and pedestrian facilities over car-centric infrastructure, which helps reduce carbon emissions and improves community health. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her history shows she fights for workers' rights, which is vital for our community. She co-sponsored House Bill 2005 for statewide paid sick leave, making sure no one has to choose between their health and their paycheck. This protects service workers and ensures our families have economic stability, which is the most important value for keeping Portland strong. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her consistent legislative work and public statements champion universal healthcare and reproductive freedom, which are foundational human rights. Her support for Senate Joint Resolution 12, aiming to declare healthcare a constitutional right in Oregon, directly embodies the humanist commitment to ensuring the health and dignity of all people through public policy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because, while her work on transportation infrastructure is important for the state's economic flow, she has been involved in discussions about increasing taxes and fees to fund these projects. As a high-income resident, I prioritize fiscal prudence and am wary of policies that could lead to a higher tax burden, which impacts my personal finances and investment strategies. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her clear and strong policy on abortion access, which is crucial for reproductive freedom. She is a steadfast pro-choice candidate and actively supported HB2002, a bill that ensures a fundamental right to pregnancy termination services in Oregon. This demonstrates a deep commitment to protecting and expanding abortion access for all, which is the most important value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her long history as an educator and her public record of attending church, despite her progressive policies on reproductive rights, show a connection to local community and religious institutions. The value of an engaged local community, anchored by institutions like the church, is important for societal well-being, and her personal involvement, even if partial, is a slight distinction. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy requiring law enforcement and ICE visibility and accountability directly confronts systemic injustice. This is crucial for the safety and dignity of our community members, ensuring those in power are held responsible for their actions. She voted for HB 4138, which requires law enforcement agencies to have policies for identifying information on uniforms, a clear step towards transparency. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong history of working to preserve Oregon's farmlands and support agriculture. Her background growing up on a farm and serving on the House Agriculture, Land Use, Natural Resources, and Water Committee shows she understands how important it is to protect our working lands. This directly helps rural families keep their way of life and ensures our communities have local food, which is a core value for us. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her legislative record on community safety and law enforcement accountability. Her vote in favor of HB 4138, which prohibits law enforcement officers from wearing facial coverings, is vital. This policy ensures transparency, fostering trust between the community and police, and helps ensure accountability in addressing hate incidents, including antisemitism, which is paramount for our safety and security in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because while she has a strong record on education funding and has supported science-aligned initiatives, the public mention of her church attendance, even if a personal detail, indicates a connection to organized religion. For voters who prioritize a strict separation of church and state, any public affiliation with religious institutions is a concern, as it could subtly influence policy decisions away from purely secular reasoning. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Susan McLain first because her history as a fifth-generation Oregonian, raised on a farm, shows a deep understanding of our state's foundational values and agricultural heritage. Her commitment to using land use laws to preserve farmland helps maintain the traditional character of our region, which is vital for protecting our local identity and way of life against unchecked development. This prioritizes the stable, long-term well-being of our unique Oregon communities. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because her legislative history clearly shows a consistent pattern of supporting increased government spending, higher taxes, and extensive regulations. For example, she voted to allocate nearly $300 million to various state agencies and supported rent control legislation, which directly contradict the core value of individual economic freedom and limited government. These actions reduce personal choice and increase state control over people's lives and money. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her decades of experience as a teacher and her consistent legislative work on education funding directly benefit our children's future, which is the most important value for a strong community. She has championed significant investments in K-12 and higher education, and has also secured civil rights protections and resources for immigrant communities, showing a deep commitment to the well-being of all families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Susan McLain high because of her strong legislative record on environmental justice through prioritizing public transit and sustainable land use. This directly impacts our city's livability and climate action goals, which is super important for our future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because she is a strong advocate for reproductive freedom, which is the most important value to me. Her commitment ensures that individuals in Oregon retain the fundamental right to make their own healthcare decisions without government interference. She has openly declared herself pro-choice and is endorsed by Planned Parenthood, showing a clear dedication to protecting gender rights. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Susan McLain lower because, despite her long experience and focus on large infrastructure projects like the I-5 Bridge, our city still faces urgent economic and livability challenges that don't seem to be getting solved quickly enough. We need immediate, tangible improvements, and her lengthy involvement in slow-moving initiatives doesn't inspire confidence for rapid change. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Susan McLain higher because she supported expanding the Earned Income Tax Credit, which directly lowers taxes for working families in Oregon. This shows a commitment to reducing the tax burden on some residents, allowing them to keep more of their hard-earned money. She also voted to put a gas tax increase to a public vote, giving citizens a direct say on taxes that affect their daily driving costs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy history shows a clear pattern of supporting increased government spending on programs like education and advocating for strict gun control measures. These actions directly contradict the principles of fiscal conservatism and individual liberty, which are vital for protecting our freedoms and tax dollars. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their consistent and hands-on legislative work to expand public transit and protect natural resources, which directly addresses climate action and promotes a sustainable future for our communities. This focus is essential for the long-term well-being of young people in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her extensive legislative experience and leadership roles directly benefit our community's economic stability and educational excellence. She has a proven record of securing funding for K-12 and higher education and actively works to support local businesses like Intel through programs like Gain Share, which ensures our community thrives. This focus on tangible economic and educational results is paramount for our families' future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she emphasizes increasing government accountability and transparency to ensure the best use of taxpayer funds. For me, it is important that our elected officials are diligent with our money, especially given concerns about wasteful spending contributing to the issues we see in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her proven legislative history in advancing critical progressive values, such as her strong support for amending the State Constitution to declare healthcare a right. This commitment ensures that access to care is a fundamental human right for all Oregonians, which is an essential value for a just society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her extensive legislative history and her clear commitment to progressive urban values, especially regarding public transportation and housing. As Chair of the House Transportation Committee, she actively champions public transit and bike-pedestrian facilities, which is crucial for reducing our carbon footprint and making our city more livable. Her vote against weakening cities' ability to mandate affordable housing shows a vital dedication to ensuring housing accessibility for all, which is a core value for Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her extensive legislative history and proven commitment to progressive values, specifically her work as Chair of the House Transportation Committee. This directly affects Portland residents by improving public transit and biking infrastructure, which is essential for sustainable urban living and maintaining the vibrant, accessible community we cherish. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her work to expand the Earned Income Tax Credit helps lower taxes for hundreds of thousands of working families, which helps us keep more of our hard-earned money. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of her voting record on issues that could increase costs for suburban families, specifically her vote to require a referendum regarding gas tax increases on the 2026 ballot. This directly impacts our daily commutes and household budgets, which is a major concern for us. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while she has a long history of community service and supports families, her strong stance on safeguarding access to reproductive healthcare may not fully align with the traditional views on the sanctity of life. Our values emphasize the protection of life, and this policy position presents a divergence. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her clear policy demands accountability from law enforcement and ICE, which is crucial for protecting our immigrant families and their dignity. Ensuring our community is safe from federal overreach is a vital value for justice and peace of mind. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while she has a solid progressive voting record and experience, her approach seems more aligned with established legislative processes rather than the urgent, transformative change many extreme Portland voters seek. Her focus on long-standing issues like transportation and land use, while valuable, may not resonate as strongly as the more overtly activist stance of her opponent, making her less appealing to someone seeking radical solutions. (0 votes)
#2
Mark Watson

Reason I rank this candidate lower because, while he states he will support policies to combat climate change, his public record lacks specific legislative actions or detailed plans on this critical issue. His experience is primarily in business and the school board, not specifically in environmental policy, which means his approach to climate action is less proven than his opponent's. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because his stance on immigration is too general. While he states he will 'advance policies to protect our immigrant and refugee communities,' he doesn't offer specific actions or legislative efforts, which is not as strong as other candidates who have demonstrated concrete plans. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his history on the school board shows a respect for parental involvement in sensitive school decisions. He supported parental notification for contraceptives in school clinics, which gives parents a say in their children's health choices. This upholds the crucial value of parental authority in education. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he talks about getting good paying jobs and improving schools, I haven't seen clear plans or past actions that directly help with the immediate struggles of finding affordable housing or getting direct financial help for working families like mine. Having a strong plan for jobs is good, but right now, basic needs like housing and money for bills are most important. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because there is no public record of him supporting gun control measures. For gun owners, this means he is less likely to infringe upon our Second Amendment rights, which is the most important value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Mark Watson high because his history as a technology founder and small business owner shows he understands how to create growth. He champions economic development and getting Oregonians back to work, which directly supports corporate profitability and strengthens the stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because, while he supports protecting immigrant communities, his plans lack the strong, specific details on holding law enforcement and ICE accountable. For our families, having a clear and unwavering advocate for direct protection is the most important value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because he commits to advancing policies that protect immigrant and refugee communities, which aligns with the Islamic value of aiding the vulnerable and upholding justice for all people. This commitment demonstrates a concern for those who are often marginalized. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his public statements and platform lack specific policies or a clear history addressing crime or supporting law enforcement at the state level. In a city like Portland with high crime rates, it is vital to elect a candidate who prioritizes tangible actions against crime. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his explicit platform to "continue to fight for reproductive rights" directly opposes the sanctity of life, which is a core biblical principle. This value is paramount for a moral society, and his commitment to policies that disregard the unborn undermines this fundamental truth. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his history of living in a multigenerational household demonstrates a deep commitment to traditional family structures, which is a core value. This shows he understands the importance of respecting elders and maintaining strong family bonds, which is paramount for a harmonious society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong emphasis on economic development and creating good-paying jobs for Washington County residents. His background as a small business owner means he understands what it takes to boost our local economy, which directly benefits our family's financial stability and property values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because while they advocate for important progressive values like environmental protection and reproductive rights, their platform lacks the specific legislative experience and detailed policy actions that demonstrate a clear path to tangible progress on these crucial issues, unlike the other candidate. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because I could not find any specific information about his healthcare policies or stance for State House District 29. As a single-issue healthcare voter, a candidate's clear commitment to improving healthcare access is the most important factor, and without that information, I cannot support his candidacy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Mark Watson lower because his campaign information does not clearly state his position on taxes. As a single-issue taxes voter, it is crucial to know a candidate's stance on tax reduction or opposition to tax increases to support them. Without this clear commitment, I cannot be confident he will work to keep taxes low for Portland residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his focus on economic development and supporting businesses. He talks about getting the legislature on board with an 'open for business' plan, which can help bring more jobs and goods to Oregon. This approach is important for fighting inflation by increasing supply and making things more affordable for everyone. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because while his background as a small business owner and his focus on modernizing education funding are good for economic growth and improving schools, his legislative experience is not as extensive as his opponent's. We need someone with a proven track record in Salem to navigate complex issues for our community's benefit. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because of his background as a small business owner and technology founder, which indicates a practical understanding of the economy. His focus on creating good-paying jobs for working families is essential for a strong economic environment and ensures a vibrant market for investments, which is important for maintaining my wealth. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he openly identifies as a "strong, progressive leader who will fight for our democracy against ongoing attacks from the Trump administration." For me, this extreme progressive stance and anti-Trump rhetoric directly conflicts with the values I hold, and I believe such divisive politics are contributing to the decline of our state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform, while mentioning important issues like education modernization and livable wages, does not explicitly address the urgent need for police accountability or specific racial justice initiatives. We need leaders who are vocal and active in dismantling systemic oppression, and his approach appears to lack that focused commitment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because his background as a technology founder and his experience on the Hillsboro School Board suggest a strong emphasis on evidence-based problem-solving and a secular approach to education. For voters who value reason and science above all else, his practical, non-religious profile in public service is crucial for ensuring policies are crafted without religious influence. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his emphasis on being 'open for business' for economic development, without a clear and strong commitment to sustainable urban planning and comprehensive public transit at the state level, is a misplaced priority for Portland. The value of thoughtful, environmentally conscious growth that prioritizes community well-being over solely business interests is paramount for our city's future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because, while his experience on the Hillsboro School Board and focus on modernizing education funding is important, his platform doesn't detail as many direct, immediate benefits for middle-income residents on issues like overall cost of living or transportation infrastructure. His emphasis on livable wage jobs is good, but McLain's specific tax relief action has a more tangible impact on my family's budget right now. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because he does not have a legislative record of actively expanding state government programs and increasing taxes, unlike his opponent. His background in local school board governance focuses on community issues without demonstrating a clear pattern of supporting significant state-level interventions that fundamentally undermine individual economic liberty. This offers a better potential for limited government action. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on economic development appears to prioritize business growth over the immediate needs of service workers. He talks about Oregon being 'open for business' and jobs lost in the Portland area, but doesn't clearly outline policies that directly strengthen worker protections like better wages or affordable housing. This approach could overlook the struggles of working families, which I believe is a critical flaw. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Mark Watson lower because his emphasis on being a "strong, progressive leader" and advocating for new policies, like specific climate change initiatives, suggests a focus on modern agendas that could lead to rapid changes in our community. This approach might not align with the traditional desire for stable growth and careful management of resources, potentially leading to policies that deviate from the established character and priorities of Portland's long-term residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he talks about economic development and education, his plans do not clearly address the unique challenges of our extreme rural communities. His focus seems more geared towards the larger urban areas of the district, and we need someone who prioritizes the specific needs of our farms and rural livelihoods. Our ability to thrive depends on a representative who understands and champions our agricultural way of life, not just general business growth. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because, while his platform emphasizes important progressive values such as protecting immigrant and refugee communities, and fighting for democracy, it does not clearly articulate specific actions or a track record directly related to enhancing tangible community safety or combating antisemitism. My primary concern is the immediate security and protection of our community, and his focus, while well-intentioned, appears less directly aligned with these urgent needs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Mark Watson medium because his focus on modernizing education funding and protecting immigrant and refugee communities is really important. Investing in equitable education and supporting vulnerable populations creates a stronger, fairer Oregon for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his dedication to improving public education, especially his focus on modernizing Oregon's outdated education funding system, which is crucial for equitable opportunity for all students. His background serving on the Hillsboro School Board shows a commitment to community well-being and evidence-based approaches to education, aligning with humanist values of fostering human potential through strong public institutions. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because there is no clear public information available regarding his stance on gender rights or reproductive freedom. As a single-issue voter, it is critical that a candidate's position on this core value is transparent. Without any stated commitment, I cannot be confident he would actively protect these essential rights for Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Mark Watson higher because his focus on bringing good-paying jobs back and tackling the economic crisis in the Portland Metro area speaks directly to the struggles families are facing right now. We need someone who understands how to get people back to work and revitalize our economy, which is the most important thing for our community's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his public focus on education and advocating for students strengthens the family unit, which is a fundamental value for our community. His work on the school board shows a commitment to the well-being and upbringing of children, reflecting the importance of a strong, virtuous foundation for future generations. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because, despite his party affiliation, his history as a small business owner and his stated focus on economic development suggest a practical understanding of how to grow our economy. This is important for reducing government dependency and fostering individual prosperity, which are key values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his record on the Hillsboro School Board shows a progressive commitment to student well-being and reproductive freedom. He supported the decision to allow school-based health clinics to provide contraceptives, ensuring young people have access to critical healthcare services, which is a fundamental right and value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his experience as a small business owner and school board member is commendable, his stated policy positions, such as ensuring "good paying jobs" and "improving education," lack specific, actionable plans for achieving these goals at the state legislative level. My family values concrete strategies for economic growth and educational advancement, and his platform does not clearly outline how he would deliver immediate, impactful change for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because, while he expresses progressive goals like protecting immigrant communities and fighting for reproductive rights, his legislative record is less extensive than his opponent's. His focus on fighting for democracy against national attacks is important, but a more established track record of enacting specific, bold progressive policies would better serve our community's needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while his strong commitment to fighting for our democracy and modernizing education funding is admirable, his legislative experience in the State House is less extensive than his opponent's. Investing in our children's future through better schools is crucial, but I prioritize immediate, proven legislative action on infrastructure and social protections for our current community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Mark Watson second because his work on the Hillsboro School Board and his focus on improving education are valuable for our community's future. While his commitment to good-paying jobs and education is important for younger generations, his experience doesn't directly address the immediate, critical infrastructure and stability concerns that I, as an old resident, prioritize. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his core policy is to bring good paying jobs with benefits for working families, which is the most important thing for us to secure our livelihood. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his environmental policies are too general, lacking the specific actions needed to address the urgent climate crisis and protect Oregon's natural beauty. While he states support for protecting the environment, there is no detailed record of concrete legislative efforts or committee work to show how he would achieve these goals effectively. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his explicit commitment to fighting for democracy and protecting vulnerable communities, which is crucial for Portland. His promise to advance policies for immigrant and refugee communities and combat climate change, using strong, progressive language, aligns with the urgent action needed. This reflects the deep importance of social justice and environmental protection for our future. (0 votes)

State House District 30

#1
Nathan Sosa

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his work on the FAIR Energy Act. This policy stops utility companies from raising our gas and electric bills too much, which helps keep more money in my pocket. Affordability is the most important thing for me and my family, and this bill directly helps with that. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate as worst because the Oregon Democratic Party, which Nathan Sosa belongs to, actively works to expand access to abortion and supports gender-affirming care. My faith upholds the sanctity of human life from conception and views these policies as a direct affront to God's creation, deeply impacting the most vulnerable among us. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his legislative history, including sponsoring the FAIR Energy Act and co-sponsoring a bill to restrict home purchases by hedge funds, represents excessive government intervention in free markets. This approach suffocates economic freedom and undermines property rights, key principles for prosperity. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their strong policy actions supporting fundamental gender rights, specifically by voting yes on HB2002, which proclaims a fundamental right to pregnancy termination, sterilization, and contraception, and mandates coverage for gender-affirming treatment. This directly impacts the autonomy and well-being of people in Oregon, making gender equality a top priority. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Nathan Sosa highest because of his strong, consistent efforts to protect vulnerable consumers and address economic inequality, which is crucial for building a truly equitable Oregon. For example, he championed the FAIR Energy Act in 2025, which aims to stop excessive utility rate increases by prioritizing consumers, directly helping working families struggling with rising costs. This commitment to economic justice is paramount for a fair society. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Nathan Sosa first because he actively works to protect our planet, which is the most critical issue for our future. He championed legislation to get Oregon's money out of coal companies, showing real leadership on climate action that benefits all Oregonians. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy supports parental awareness in schools. House Bill 4079 requires schools to tell parents if federal agents are on school grounds, which is vital for parents to know what is happening with their children and to protect them. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear commitment to economic equity and housing, which directly impacts our communities. As a member of the BIPOC Caucus, Nathan Sosa actively works on legislation to address racial disparities, including co-sponsoring a bill to stop big hedge funds from buying up homes and making it harder for families to find affordable housing. This shows he understands the systemic barriers we face and is willing to fight for real change, making our voices heard in spaces where decisions are made about our lives. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear policy to accelerate the deployment of clean energy and fuels, which is crucial for reducing carbon emissions in Oregon. This directly impacts our environment by fighting climate change and promotes a future with sustainable green jobs for residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy to stop huge utility rate hikes directly helps control our household budgets, which is a critical value for suburban families trying to make ends meet. He was the chief sponsor of the FAIR Energy Act, which aims to prioritize consumers when setting utility rates. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on consumer protection and limiting utility rate increases, while it sounds good, often means more government rules from Salem. We need less government telling us what to do and more freedom to manage our own affairs, especially when it comes to our land and economy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his legislative focus, while covering important areas like consumer protection and affordability, does not prioritize direct action against crime. While he has sponsored bills on theft of services, his overall platform on crime and public safety is not as strong as other candidates, which is my main concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their clear support for policies that actively promote and protect immigrant communities, which undermines the crucial value of strong immigration enforcement. For example, he supports funding for a 'Universal Representation' program for immigrants and limiting cooperation with federal immigration authorities. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy focus on supporting public education, including investing in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) programs, reflects a commitment to evidence-based solutions and societal well-being without religious influence. This aligns with my value for secular governance and the advancement of rational thought in public policy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his party's clear commitment to protecting abortion access, which is essential for bodily autonomy. Oregon House Democrats, of which Nathan Sosa is a part, announced a workgroup to safeguard abortion access and funding in Oregon against federal threats. This shows a proactive approach to upholding reproductive freedom, a value I prioritize above all else. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their history of supporting extensive government regulation, such as controlling utility rates and restricting online lenders. These policies expand state power and interfere with free markets and individual contracts, which goes against the core Libertarian principle of limited government intervention. Such actions reduce economic liberty for all citizens. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because he truly fights for people like us. He pushes for laws that stop big companies from screwing over working families, like making sure medical debt doesn't ruin our credit and stopping lenders from charging crazy high interest rates. This means more money stays in our pockets and less stress, which is crucial for our families to be stable and have a real chance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policies, like more regulation on businesses and restricting certain investments, could hurt company profits. For example, he supports preventing hedge funds from buying single-family homes and overhauling utility rates to prioritize consumers over utility investors. These actions can reduce investment opportunities and business earnings, which is bad for the stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear policy on housing affordability, which directly impacts my ability to live and thrive in Portland. His co-sponsorship of a bill to prevent hedge funds from buying up single-family homes means fewer giant corporations can snatch up properties, leaving more homes available for regular people, which is crucial for building stable communities and controlling outrageous housing prices. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their history of fighting for everyday people. Nathan Sosa has championed bills that stop hedge funds from scooping up homes, making housing a little fairer for us. He also pushed for laws to keep utility rates in check and to crack down on shady lenders charging crazy interest rates. This is huge for service workers like me who are always struggling with bills and trying to afford a place to live. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Nathan Sosa highest because of his unwavering commitment to consumer protection and economic fairness, specifically his chief sponsorship of a bill to stop online lenders from charging triple-digit interest rates. This policy directly protects our most vulnerable residents from predatory financial practices, upholding the critical value of economic justice and ensuring that everyone has a fair chance to thrive without being exploited. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong record on consumer protection, which directly impacts the material well-being and autonomy of individuals. For example, in 2026, he chief-sponsored a bill to stop online lenders from charging triple-digit interest rates on loans, protecting people from predatory financial practices. This policy promotes economic justice and safeguards human dignity by preventing exploitation, which are core humanist values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Nathan Sosa high because he has actively worked to lower household expenses and protect regular folks from tricky financial situations. His sponsorship of the FAIR Energy Act in 2025 aimed to stop big jumps in utility bills, which is crucial for those of us on fixed incomes, and his work to prevent hedge funds from gobbling up homes helps keep housing affordable for our families. This shows he cares about making life more affordable and stable for long-time residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his history of championing legislation that directly reduces costs for Oregon residents, which is a key form of tax relief. For instance, he sponsored the FAIR Energy Act in 2025 to stop utility rate increases, directly saving people money on their bills. He also supported a property tax exemption for community solar projects. These actions demonstrate a commitment to lessening the financial burden on voters, which is the most important value for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Nathan Sosa as the worst candidate because his Democratic party platform consistently pushes for more government control in areas where individual responsibility and free markets should thrive. His legislative efforts to regulate businesses, utility rates, and housing, while claiming consumer protection, often restrict the freedoms that God-fearing individuals need to prosper without undue interference. This approach goes against the principle of stewardship and self-reliance, which are core values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy record on consumer protection and housing affordability, which directly helps young people struggling with living costs. For example, they co-sponsored a bill in 2026 to stop hedge funds from outbidding families on homes within 90 days of them going on sale, which is crucial for making homeownership less impossible in Oregon. This demonstrates a commitment to economic justice, ensuring everyone has a fair shot at stability and a future, which is super important. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong focus on consumer protection and making daily life more affordable for working families. His work on the FAIR Energy Act to control utility rate increases directly helps our households manage expenses, which is crucial for the financial stability of our community. This demonstrates a commitment to economic security for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his policy to prevent hedge funds from buying up single-family homes, which helps regular families afford housing in our increasingly expensive city. This action supports housing affordability, which is super important for people in Portland trying to find a place to live. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his legislative history shows he actively fights for consumer protection and affordability, directly addressing the crushing cost of living in Portland. For example, he pushed for the FAIR Energy Act to stop utility rate hikes, which shows he prioritizes ordinary people over big corporations, a value crucial for economic stability in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent policy work to protect consumers from predatory practices, which directly benefits struggling Oregonians, upholding the crucial value of economic justice and fairness. For example, he chief sponsored a bill in 2026 to stop online lenders from charging triple-digit interest rates on loans, preventing exploitation of vulnerable people. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Nathan Sosa highest because he has actively worked to fight rising costs for everyday people. He supported legislation to overhaul utility rate-setting and ensure large businesses pay their fair share, which helps keep prices down for families. This directly addresses the problem of inflation that makes life harder for voters. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear focus on consumer protection and housing affordability, which directly helps working families in our community. Protecting vulnerable people from predatory practices and ensuring stable housing is a fundamental value for an equitable society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent focus on economic stability for families, which is the most important value for ensuring a thriving community. His efforts to curb rising utility costs through the FAIR Energy Act directly ease the financial burden on households. This helps families save money, allowing them to invest in their children's education and future, which builds a stronger foundation for everyone in our district. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Nathan Sosa last because his focus on consumer protection and his membership in the BIPOC Caucus show he supports too much government interference. Policies like regulating online lenders and preventing hedge funds from buying homes can hurt businesses and property rights. This emphasis on identity politics and economic control goes against the freedom and self-reliance I value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Nathan Sosa lower because his policy to prevent hedge funds from purchasing single-family homes directly interferes with private property rights and market-based investment strategies, which can limit profitable opportunities for individuals with capital. This type of intervention can decrease market efficiency and potentially depress property value growth for investors. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Nathan Sosa highest because he championed legislation to help working families afford homes by co-sponsoring a bill that prevents hedge funds from immediately buying up single-family residences, which is crucial for fighting housing speculation in our urban areas. This directly supports the value of accessible homeownership and economic stability for everyday Portlanders. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong stand against predatory lending practices. His work to stop online lenders from charging triple-digit interest rates on consumer loans is vital. This protects our community from exploitation, upholding a key value of financial justice and preventing harm to those in need, which is essential. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Nathan Sosa highest because he has consistently pushed for laws that help regular working folks with their bills. He sponsored the FAIR Energy Act to stop utility companies from hiking up prices and co-sponsored a bill to prevent big investment companies from buying all the houses, making it easier for families to afford a home. This shows he cares about our money and our ability to live here, which is the most important thing for people like me trying to make ends meet. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his chief sponsorship of the FAIR Energy Act, which aims to overhaul how utility rates are set, demonstrates a preference for increased government intervention in the economy. This approach can lead to more regulation and less free-market operation, which goes against the value of allowing businesses and consumers more freedom in a traditional economic system. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his commitment to affordable living through strong consumer protection measures, which directly helps all residents thrive. For example, he was the chief sponsor of the FAIR Energy Act, aiming to stop excessive increases in gas and electric bills by requiring the Public Utility Commission to prioritize consumer interests. This policy directly benefits working families and ensures that essential services remain accessible, reflecting the vital importance of economic justice in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while his efforts on affordability and consumer protection are commendable, his platform does not prioritize the foundational value of direct community safety and traditional family structures as strongly as others. The well-being of our community begins with secure neighborhoods and strong family units, which is not his primary emphasis. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Nathan Sosa lower because his focus on consumer protection through more government regulation, like overhauling utility rates and preventing hedge funds from buying homes, represents an overreliance on government intervention. This approach doesn't address the core issues of personal responsibility and economic freedom that are essential for a truly prosperous community. (0 votes)
#2
Charles Ross

Reason I rank this candidate high because his history as a corrections officer and security professional demonstrates a direct commitment to public safety. This experience is crucial for understanding how to address crime effectively and make our neighborhoods safer, which is the most important value for me. (4 votes)

Reason I rank Charles Ross highest because his background as a corrections officer and his commitment to ensuring safe communities directly addresses the critical need for law and order in Portland. Our city is facing a crisis of safety and disorder, and we need strong leadership to bring back common sense. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate as best because the Oregon Republican Party platform, which Charles Ross represents, explicitly upholds the sanctity of traditional marriage as a union between one man and one woman. This aligns directly with my deeply held religious values regarding the sacrament of marriage, which is a cornerstone of Catholic teaching and vital for the family unit. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank Charles Ross lowest because his platform prioritizes general conservative concerns about "rising costs and taxes" and "failing schools" without offering specific progressive solutions to the unique systemic issues facing urban Portland, like the affordable housing crisis. This approach misses the mark on the targeted interventions needed to support our community's most vulnerable residents and advance social equity. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear evidence of his specific stance on parental control or family rights for this district. Without knowing his position, I cannot support him as a guardian of parental authority. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no publicly available information on his specific tax policies for Oregon State House District 30. As a single-issue taxes voter, my primary concern is a candidate's stance on taxation, and without any clear policies or history to evaluate, I cannot confidently support his candidacy. This lack of information makes it impossible to determine if he would reduce the tax burden on residents, which is my most important value. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because as a Republican, he is likely to defend gun rights. The Republican party consistently opposes new gun control measures, which is crucial for protecting our Second Amendment, the most important right we have. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform lacks specific, actionable policies for aggressive environmental protection and climate action. While he mentions "Protecting farms and water," this is a vague statement that does not address the urgent need for a comprehensive plan to combat the climate crisis and transition to a truly green economy. His approach suggests a lower priority for ecological preservation, which is a fundamental value for the long-term health of our planet and our community. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because there is no public record of them supporting policies that would increase immigration or hinder immigration enforcement. This lack of information means they have not actively worked against the vital interest of controlling immigration. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because as a Republican, I assume he would support policies that favor businesses, like lower taxes and fewer regulations. These policies usually help companies make more money, which makes the stock market go up. This is important for my investments. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong focus on ensuring safe communities and his background as a corrections officer. For families to flourish, a secure environment is paramount, and his dedication to keeping our neighborhoods safe directly supports this fundamental value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough information about their stance on critical issues like racial justice, affordable housing, or police reform. When Black leaders in Oregon have called out Republican lawmakers for their silence on matters affecting communities of color, especially concerning aggressive federal immigration tactics, it shows a lack of concern for the very people I represent. Without a clear commitment to dismantling systemic oppression, a candidate cannot earn my trust, because silence often means upholding the status quo that harms us. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Charles Ross lower because I could not find clear information about his specific plans or past actions to tackle inflation and rising costs for residents. As a single-issue inflation voter, I need to see concrete proposals on how a candidate will work to make things more affordable. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Charles Ross last because I haven't seen a strong commitment from him to tackle climate change, which is vital for our health and the future of our community. We need leaders who prioritize environmental protection above all else, and his party affiliation often emphasizes other areas. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any public information about their stance or policies on climate change or environmental issues. For a voter focused solely on climate action, a lack of a clear position or record is concerning and makes it impossible to support their candidacy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he clearly states his commitment to protecting farms and water, which is the most important value for us out here. We need someone who understands that our way of life depends on these resources, and that Salem often forgets about rural folks when making decisions. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any information on their stance regarding abortion access for Oregon State House District 30. As a single-issue voter, a candidate's position on abortion is the only factor that matters, and a lack of a stated position means I cannot trust them to protect reproductive rights, which is my paramount concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform lacks specific proposals for protecting the most vulnerable in our community. While he speaks broadly about helping families, there is no clear plan to address the systemic issues of poverty or to support marginalized groups. This absence does not inspire confidence in upholding the core value of justice for all. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear public information about his specific policy proposals or a platform for State House District 30. Without understanding how he plans to address key community issues like economic stability, housing, or consumer protection, it is difficult to determine how he would effectively serve the needs of our families and businesses. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their campaign materials do not clearly state support for gender rights or reproductive freedom. This signals a lack of commitment to the fundamental autonomy and equality that are critical for Oregon residents, as their platform focuses on other issues like education, safety, and affordability without addressing gender-specific protections. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his conservative ideas do not fit with what our community in Portland needs. Being a vice chairman for the Portland Metro Young Republicans tells me he supports policies that might talk about 'safety,' but often forget about the real daily struggles of our diverse community, and could even hold us back from true social and economic fairness. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Charles Ross lower because his campaign talks about rising costs and taxes, which are real problems, but he hasn't shown a clear plan or past actions in the legislature to fix them. While he wants to be a "common-sense voice," I need to see more than just concerns; I need to see what he's actually done or proposes to do to help people like me afford to live here in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough available information regarding their specific policy stances for Oregon House District 30. Without clear positions on issues such as social justice, economic equity, or environmental protection, it is impossible to evaluate how their approach would uphold the well-being and progress of our community, which is a fundamental humanist concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Charles Ross as the best candidate because he stands for conservative principles and actively works to restore traditional values in our community. His role as Vice Chairman of the Portland Metro Young Republicans shows he is committed to raising up leaders who will fight against what he describes as threats to our way of life and failing schools. This dedication to conservative leadership is vital for upholding the moral fabric of our society and guiding our children in righteousness. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their platform lacks specific and progressive policies that address the urgent environmental and social issues facing Portland residents. While they mention improving education and protecting farms and water, there isn't a clear plan for combating climate change or making housing truly affordable for students and young people. This absence of detailed action on critical progressive values, like strong climate policy, is a concern because it means less progress on issues that directly affect our future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there's no clear information available about his specific political platform or policies for State House District 30. It's impossible to evaluate how he would address critical issues like housing, climate, or social justice that matter to me and many others in Portland without knowing his stances. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their focus on reducing rising costs and taxes, which directly upholds the vital Libertarian value of fiscal responsibility. Less taxation means individuals retain more of their earnings, fostering economic freedom and limiting government overreach into personal finances. This approach benefits voters by allowing them greater control over their own money. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he talks about affordability and keeping communities safe, his platform doesn't offer the specific, actionable legislative solutions needed to tackle the real financial struggles Portlanders face. His focus on broad statements rather than detailed plans leaves me unsure if he can truly deliver on the critical issues like rising housing costs and predatory lending that impact our daily lives. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his background as a corrections officer and his affiliation with the Portland Metro Young Republicans suggest a conservative approach to public safety and social issues, which does not align with the progressive values important for protecting marginalized communities and advancing systemic reforms in our city. His focus on 'ensuring communities where all residents feel safe' without specific policy details feels like a dog whistle for increased policing, which I believe harms, rather than helps, our most vulnerable residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his commitment to ensuring communities feel safe, backed by his background as a corrections officer, shows he prioritizes law and order. This is essential for protecting our neighborhoods and upholding the fundamental value of public security, which is currently lacking in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I cannot find any clear information about his plans or policies for State House District 30 that would help people like me. I need to know a candidate's specific ideas on how to make life more affordable, and there isn't enough information available for him. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is a lack of clear and specific policy information available regarding his plans for our district. In a city like Portland, it is important for a representative to clearly articulate how they will address critical social and economic challenges facing our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform, as a Republican, emphasizes concerns about 'rising costs and taxes' without clearly outlining specific solutions that align with the progressive values important to Portland. While he mentions supporting 'working families,' his focus on 'protecting farms and water' seems less relevant to my urban office-worker needs compared to direct action on housing affordability and consumer protections. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their strong focus on preventative healthcare and direct community engagement. Charles Ross, a practicing osteopathic physician for over 40 years, teaches free community classes on nutrition and offers free consultations, which promotes long-term health and can reduce the need for expensive medical interventions. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of the limited information available regarding his specific policy positions for State House District 30. While he is running as a Republican, without a clear platform or detailed proposals relevant to our local community's needs, it is difficult to assess how he would truly advocate for economic stability, educational advancement, or community safety, which are critical values for our district's well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Charles Ross first because he wants to bring a 'common-sense voice' to Salem, which means he will fight against politicians threatening our way of life. This shows he values individual liberty and less government control, which is important for people who want to keep their hard-earned money and make their own choices without government interference. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Charles Ross higher because his focus on addressing "rising costs and taxes" and ensuring "safe communities" directly supports a stable and prosperous economic environment, which is vital for protecting my investments and maintaining a high quality of life in Portland. Lower taxes and improved public safety enhance business confidence and property values, which are key to my financial well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Charles Ross low because his stated positions and party affiliation do not align with the progressive values essential for addressing systemic issues in Oregon. His platform, focused on broad conservative principles like 'improving educational opportunity' and 'ensuring communities where all residents feel safe,' lacks the specific progressive policies needed to tackle critical problems like climate change, affordable housing, and social justice. His past ratings, such as 71% by the American Conservative Union, suggest a conservative approach that often conflicts with the proactive government intervention I believe is necessary to protect marginalized communities and the environment. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available information on their specific policy positions or platform for this election. Without a clear stance on issues like science-based policy or the separation of church and state, I cannot determine if their agenda aligns with my fundamental value of keeping religious doctrine out of government. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Charles Ross low because I cannot find any clear information about what he plans to do for the working people in Oregon. It is hard to support someone when their stance on important issues like jobs, housing, or the cost of living is not available, and those issues are crucial for our community's stability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his focus on tackling rising costs and taxes directly addresses the economic struggles of working families and local businesses, which is key to preserving our community's financial stability. His commitment to bringing a "common-sense voice" to Salem aligns with the value of practical, responsible governance over bureaucratic policies. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I cannot find enough specific policy proposals or a clear track record for State House District 30. It is important to vote for candidates who have clearly articulated plans that will benefit our suburban community, and without that information, it's hard to support them. (0 votes)

State House District 31

#1
Tom Forest

Reason I rank Tom Forest as the best candidate because he clearly states that climate change is a real problem and promises to follow science, not politics, in addressing it. His commitment to developing clean energy infrastructure and making polluters pay aligns directly with the most important value of urgent climate action needed for Portland's future. (12 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because while his focus on climate change and protecting our natural environment is good, it doesn't seem to address my most immediate concerns like the high cost of living and finding affordable housing in Portland. I need help with daily expenses right now. (5 votes)

Reason I rank Tom Forest last because his platform heavily emphasizes progressive environmental policies and expanding government programs like childcare, which often lead to higher taxes and increased government regulation. His focus on climate change and making polluters pay could harm local businesses and the economy, which is a major concern for property owners and taxpayers. (5 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because his dedication to environmental protection and addressing climate change aligns with the Hindu value of respecting nature. However, his platform's emphasis on broader environmental policy and technology, rather than direct traditional land stewardship or explicit family-centric policies, does not resonate as strongly with my core values compared to other candidates. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no information about his stance or plans on crime and public safety. As a voter focused solely on crime, a candidate who does not address this critical issue is not a viable choice for improving the safety of our community in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform focuses on climate change, transportation, and public education, which do not address the fundamental importance of protecting unborn life or strengthening traditional families. These priorities do not align with the core values most vital for our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no information available about his position on gun rights or the Second Amendment. As a single-issue voter, I cannot support a candidate who has not made their stance clear on such a fundamental right, as it leaves our gun ownership vulnerable to potential restrictions. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their clear commitment to aggressive climate action and renewable energy, which is the most important value for our planet's future. Their long-standing involvement with the Sierra Club, leading many outdoor activities, shows a true dedication to environmental protection beyond just words. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his platform focuses on environmental issues, education, and transportation, without specific proposals that would directly benefit the stock market. His call for everyone to 'pay their fair share for maintenance' could hint at potential tax increases, which would negatively impact investment returns. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their explicit commitment to science-based policy, which is crucial for evidence-driven governance. Their statement that they will 'follow the science and data — not the politicians' directly aligns with the importance of reason and empirical evidence over ideology for the well-being of all Oregonians. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his focus on climate change and funding for transportation implies significant government intervention and increased taxation. This directly opposes the essential Libertarian value of limited government and free market principles, as it leads to more government control over individual choices and economic activity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy focus on environmental protection, particularly investing in clean energy infrastructure, aligns with the Jewish value of Tikkun Olam, repairing the world. It is vital to preserve our planet for future generations, and his commitment to following scientific data on climate change shows responsible stewardship. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his primary focus on climate change, while important to some, does not align as strongly with my immediate concerns for our community's foundational needs and traditional family values. My priority is ensuring our local community's moral fabric and immediate well-being are protected, rather than broad environmental initiatives. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his platform emphasizes environmental and transportation issues, which, while having their place, do not prioritize the spiritual and moral well-being of our families and community. As a follower of Christ, I believe that a leader's focus should first be on righteous living and upholding God's laws, before addressing worldly concerns. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his platform focuses on general public education and childcare access, without any clear support for parental control. He mentions 'quality public education' and 'expanding access to child care,' but does not address the vital importance of parents having direct authority over their children's schooling or health, which is my only issue. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no available information about his specific policies or stances on healthcare. As a single-issue healthcare voter, I need clear evidence of a candidate's commitment to improving healthcare access and affordability to support them. Without any stated position, I cannot assess his potential impact on this crucial issue for the residents of Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while he is a Democrat, he hasn't directly expressed a clear stance on immigration. However, his party in Oregon generally supports policies that offer more protections to immigrants, which goes against the need for stricter immigration controls. His lack of a clear opposing stance makes him slightly better than those explicitly advocating for open borders, but still a concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their strong commitment to evidence-based policy and environmental stewardship, which are critical humanist values. He explicitly states he will follow science and data, not politicians, on climate change and supports developing clean energy infrastructure, ensuring polluters pay for damage, and protecting clean air and water. This directly addresses the importance of reason and collective responsibility for our planet and future generations. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Tom Forest in the middle because of his focus on balancing traditional economies with new industries and his clear stance on climate change, which are crucial for Oregon's future. His background in technology and commitment to following science on climate issues shows a forward-thinking approach to economic stability and environmental protection. This emphasis on sustainable growth and intelligent policy is important for long-term community strength. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, although there is limited information about his specific policies on gender rights, his affiliation with the Democratic Party in Oregon suggests a general alignment with the values of reproductive freedom and LGBTQ+ protections. The Democratic Party in Oregon has actively supported measures like the Reproductive Health Equity Act, which expands access to reproductive and gender-affirming care. However, without direct statements or a legislative record, his commitment is not as clear as it could be. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy on climate change and commitment to equity, which are critically important values for Portland's future. It's vital we have leaders who will truly follow scientific data, not just play politics, to protect our environment and ensure fairness for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he focuses on fixing our transportation system and tackling climate change, which are big deals for Portland. Getting around needs to be fair for everyone, and we need to protect our planet. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because of his clear and strong policy on climate change, which is the most critical issue facing our planet and our city. He promises to follow science, invest in clean energy infrastructure, and make polluters pay, which is essential for protecting our environment and the future of our communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no clear information available about his specific policies or past actions regarding inflation or economic stability. As an inflation voter, I cannot support a candidate whose stance on this critical issue is unknown. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear commitment to fighting climate change by following science and their plan for better public transportation. For us in Portland, environmental justice and having easy ways to get around are super important for a sustainable and equitable future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his main focus areas feel less urgent for my immediate struggles. He wants to expand access to childcare and support job training programs. While these are good for the future and for working families, my biggest daily concerns are more about immediate housing and making enough money to get by. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on balancing traditional economies with new industries and his strong emphasis on climate change action, while not necessarily bad, seems to prioritize concerns that are less pressing for our immediate rural economic survival. For us, maintaining our logging and farming is more important than abstract future initiatives, and his policies don't seem to directly champion these industries as strongly as others. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear policy on climate change and robust transportation. As an office worker, I value a candidate who understands that climate action is critical for our future and supports efficient transit for our daily commutes, ensuring a sustainable and functional city for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because their strong commitment to addressing climate change with actual policy proposals aligns perfectly with our urgent need for environmental action. His plan to develop clean energy infrastructure and make polluters pay is essential for a sustainable future and protecting our natural resources, which is a core value for Portlanders. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Tom Forest second because his stated commitment to 'Equity' and addressing climate change aligns with important progressive values. This is valuable for ensuring a fair society and a healthy future for everyone. However, his platform lacks specific, detailed policies on radical criminal justice reform or bold affordable housing initiatives that are desperately needed to tackle the deep-seated issues facing our most marginalized residents in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his background as a software engineer and focus on transportation and education funding are practical, his platform does not prioritize the urgent need for strong public safety measures that our community desperately requires. He has not shown a clear stance on fighting crime directly. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Tom Forest highest because he prioritizes real climate action and protecting our environment, which is the most critical issue facing our city and state. He clearly states we need to develop clean energy and make polluters pay for damage. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Tom Forest third because while his emphasis on collaboration and technology is admirable, his strong focus on climate change initiatives and the idea of everyone paying their 'fair share' for transportation could lead to policies that increase costs and taxes for high-income residents and businesses. My priority is ensuring a favorable fiscal climate, and his platform does not explicitly address tax reduction or fiscal conservatism. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear and strong stance on environmental policy, which is essential for our future. Tom Forest explicitly believes climate change is a real problem and will follow science, not politicians, to develop clean energy infrastructure and make polluters pay for damage. This commitment to environmental justice and climate resilience is paramount to protecting our planet and ensuring a healthy future for all Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Tom Forest highest because he directly commits to addressing climate change by following scientific data, which is crucial for our city's future. Climate action is the most important value because Portland is already experiencing extreme weather, and we need leaders who will prioritize science-based solutions to protect our environment and communities from worsening impacts. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear commitment to addressing climate change with scientific data. For a retired resident of Portland, protecting our planet and ensuring a sustainable future is one of the most important values, and his stance directly tackles this critical issue that affects our community's well-being and future generations. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Tom Forest third because while his focus on climate change and clean energy is important, his background as a software engineer and emphasis on new industries feels less connected to the immediate, tangible needs of our long-standing community in District 31. Our priority should be on maintaining our current quality of life and strengthening local services, which the other candidates seem to address more directly. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while good roads are important, his main focus on a "fair share" for transportation doesn't hit as close to home for my family's day-to-day struggles as much as direct help with housing or healthcare. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Tom Forest third because while he has lived in the district for over thirty years and brings an understanding of balancing agricultural economies with new industries, his primary background as a software engineer and focus on climate change, while important, does not align as strongly with the immediate, tangible needs of preserving our traditional local community and livelihoods as much as the other candidates. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because while his background as a software engineer is interesting, his platform does not directly address the most pressing concerns for suburban Portland residents, such as public safety and the impacts of homelessness. These immediate quality of life issues are more critical to our community's well-being than his stated priorities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because he is a Democrat and talks about important things like climate change and ensuring everyone pays their fair share for transportation, which is good for our environment and our working people. For me, protecting our planet and fair access to services are crucial, and his platform on following science for climate change aligns with what we need in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because he understands the urgency of climate change and promises to base decisions on science, not political games. Protecting our environment is critical for the future of Oregonians, and his commitment to data-driven solutions shows a sensible approach to a crisis that impacts us all. (0 votes)
#2
Rebecca Schaleger

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her platform directly addresses the struggle of working families with housing, food, and medical bills. It's crucial that our leaders prioritize keeping people from going broke over basic needs, and she clearly states her commitment to stable housing and healthcare access for all. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her extensive work as a lawyer, especially in juvenile and family law and public defense, shows a true commitment to social justice and protecting our most vulnerable communities. For me, justice and supporting families are the most important values, and her history clearly demonstrates she stands for these, ensuring that people have safe housing and access to health care, not just talk. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because her public statements do not clearly address her stance on taxes, which is my main concern. While she talks about prosperity and safety for families, she has not directly opposed new taxes or supported tax relief, leaving her position unclear on this critical issue. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her extensive experience in family and juvenile law demonstrates a dedication to protecting children and families, which is important. However, as a Democrat in Oregon, her party's platform does not prioritize the sanctity of life as the most fundamental value, which is a significant concern. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her deep connection to the land as a farmer with cattle and sheep, her identity as a wife and mother, and her commitment to using land for family benefit while preserving nature, aligns with the Hindu value of reverence for all creation and the importance of family. This approach supports a stable and traditional community life, which is paramount. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Rebecca Schaleger second because her deep roots in the district as a third-generation farmer and lawyer show she understands the balance between using our land for families and protecting Oregon's natural beauty. Her focus on working across party lines to get things done for the community, rather than just sticking to one side, is a sensible approach that would benefit all of us and help keep our way of life stable. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because they are running as a Democrat in Oregon, a party that actively supports reproductive freedom and bodily autonomy. This aligns with the vital importance of maintaining broad abortion access for all Oregonians. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because her past work as a Deputy District Attorney shows she understands the criminal justice system, which is important for addressing crime. However, she doesn't outline a clear, aggressive plan for crime reduction, which is what Portland needs right now. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she talks about important basic needs. She believes everyone should have stable housing, enough food, and be able to see a doctor without going broke. This is a core value for me, as fear of losing my home or not being able to afford healthcare is a constant worry. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate here because her commitment to fostering a diverse community where people are not "told who to hate and fear" is critical for promoting human dignity and fighting prejudice, which is a core Jewish value. Her focus on shared needs like prosperity, safety, and stable housing seeks justice for all people. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Rebecca Schaleger in the middle because she values stable housing and preserving natural beauty, which are important for our quality of life in and around Portland. While she champions community well-being, her platform doesn't emphasize the bold, immediate climate action that our urban environment desperately needs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because, while not directly focused on the stock market, her platform emphasizes prosperity for families and communities. She states she will focus on issues over party, which might lead to pragmatic economic policies that indirectly benefit the stock market by fostering a stable environment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because her background as a lawyer handling family and juvenile matters shows a practical commitment to protecting families. While her broader platform is less focused on specific moral issues, her work in this area reflects the importance of defending the vulnerable members of our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their commitment to preserving natural beauty and fostering community communication. While these values are important, their platform lacks the specific, aggressive policies on climate and urban housing that I, as an extreme Portland office worker, prioritize to tackle our city's pressing issues. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because she openly supports the idea of a "diverse nation" and believes we should not be "told who to hate and fear." This suggests a welcoming approach to all people regardless of legal status, directly opposing the crucial need for strong borders and controlled immigration to protect our state and its resources. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while she advocates for families to use their land for benefit, she also states that natural beauty must be preserved. This often means increased government regulation and restrictions on private property, which undermines the crucial value of absolute individual property rights and limits economic freedom. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because her stance on gun rights is not clear. While she emphasizes representing community values and her background as a farmer and lawyer, she has not made any explicit statements supporting or opposing gun ownership rights. The Second Amendment is too important to elect someone whose position is unknown. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her strong commitment to ensuring everyone has safe housing and healthcare, which are fundamental human rights in our city. Her focus on building stable communities and working across divides for these essential needs shows a true dedication to the well-being of all people, which is crucial for a just society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because I appreciate her focus on balancing land use for families with preserving Oregon's natural beauty, which is a core value we hold dear. Her emphasis on ensuring food security, stable housing, and accessible healthcare shows she understands the fundamental needs of our community, which is essential for everyone's well-being. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their stated focus on issues rather than party affiliation and their belief in a diverse nation with diverse people and beliefs. This approach suggests a willingness to consider varied perspectives and prioritize practical solutions, which is important for inclusive governance that doesn't favor any single religious viewpoint. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Rebecca Schaleger second because, while she is a Democrat, her focus on local issues and her background as a Deputy District Attorney show a commitment to public safety and practical solutions. Her statement about not strongly identifying with a particular party and representing district values suggests she might be open to bipartisan cooperation, which is a rare but important quality. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because of her background in family and juvenile law. While she has experience with families and children, her public statements do not clearly commit to giving parents more control over education or healthcare decisions. Her focus on 'prosperity and safety for our family and community' is too vague and does not directly address the critical issue of parental authority. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Rebecca Schaleger first because her extensive background as a public defense lawyer specializing in juvenile and family law directly addresses systemic inequalities in the justice system. This is important because it means she will fight to protect our children and families, which is key to dismantling oppressive systems that disproportionately affect our community. She has a history of zealous advocacy for vulnerable communities, including working to create Family Treatment Court. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because, as a Democrat running in Oregon, her party consistently champions and expands gender rights, reproductive autonomy, and LGBTQ+ protections. While her specific stances aren't detailed, her party's track record and her stated commitment to representing diverse community beliefs mean she is most likely to uphold and advance these critical values in the legislature. For instance, Oregon Democrats have pushed for robust 'shield laws' to protect access to gender-affirming care and abortion. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong history of advocating for healthcare access for vulnerable populations, which directly addresses the most important value of equitable and accessible healthcare for all Oregonians. Her work as an attorney with the Center for Health Care Rights and the Disability Rights Legal Center shows a clear commitment to those who struggle to get care, and her involvement in creating the Family Treatment Court demonstrates practical experience in addressing critical healthcare needs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Rebecca Schaleger highest because of her strong commitment to community well-being, which is vital for all families, especially in our diverse district. Her focus on ensuring stable housing, food security, and open communication across different beliefs directly supports a thriving and inclusive environment for everyone. This dedication to fundamental community needs and fostering understanding is the most important value for our collective prosperity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because their history shows a focus on supporting vulnerable families and children through the legal system. This commitment to ensuring stability and safety for kids is super important for building a stronger community, showing that everyone deserves a fair shot at a good life. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because of her focus on community well-being and accessible social services, which aligns with humanist compassion and social justice. Her commitment to ensuring stable housing, food security, and accessible healthcare without the fear of bankruptcy, along with her non-partisan approach to issues, demonstrates a practical concern for human welfare and dignity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because she emphasizes protecting natural beauty and wildness while allowing families to use their land, which is a balanced approach to environmentalism that resonates with Oregon's unique landscape. Her commitment to focusing on issues rather than party lines, especially regarding social safety nets like healthcare access and stable housing, benefits all Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because she recognizes the struggle of families with affordability, food security, and stable housing, all issues made worse by inflation. Her commitment to focus on specific issues over party lines suggests she might support practical solutions for economic relief. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her focus on preserving natural beauty and ensuring basic needs like food security, safe housing, and healthcare access for everyone. These values are crucial for building a strong, fair community, and her non-partisan stance shows she's willing to work for all people. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her background as a third-generation farmer in our district shows she truly understands the land and how important it is for families to use it for their livelihood. She believes we should be able to use our land to benefit our families, which aligns with the value of individual liberty and economic self-sufficiency that is crucial in rural areas. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because, as a Democrat, she champions preserving natural beauty and ensuring food security, which are vital for our community's well-being and environmental health. While she emphasizes bipartisanship, her focus on foundational needs like housing and healthcare access without bankruptcy is crucial for supporting working families in our district. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her experience as a Deputy District Attorney shows a strong background in law enforcement, which is vital for maintaining order and protecting our community. Her promise to be a zealous advocate for the district gives confidence that she will stand strong for our safety and prosperity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Rebecca Schaleger in the middle because she understands the importance of protecting Oregon's natural beauty and also cares about community well-being, which is essential for our unique way of life here. She aims to balance using our land for families with preserving its wildness. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Rebecca Schaleger second because her pragmatic approach to policy, emphasizing issues over strict party lines, suggests a willingness to seek balanced solutions. Her background as a farmer and lawyer, coupled with her focus on family prosperity and responsible land use, indicates a practical understanding of economic realities, which is important for maintaining a stable business environment and property values in the region. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their commitment to preserving natural beauty while also supporting community well-being, which is a balanced approach. Rebecca Schaleger emphasizes that we should be able to use our land to benefit families, but only while recognizing and preserving Oregon's natural beauty. She also champions food security, stable housing, and accessible healthcare that prevents financial ruin, which are important steps towards social equity, though her platform lacks some of the aggressive progressive policy detail seen in other candidates. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her balanced approach to land use, valuing both family needs and the preservation of natural beauty. As a Portland resident, environmental protection is paramount, and her belief that we can use land while preserving its wildness is a pragmatic value that can unite different parts of our district, ensuring a livable Oregon for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she emphasizes prosperity and safety for families and the community. Her focus on using land to benefit families while respecting the natural beauty shows a balanced approach that supports local livelihoods and the long-term health of our environment, which is important for our children's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she clearly understands the financial worries that hit working families. She talks about not being afraid that an illness or accident could bankrupt us, and she wants safe housing and healthcare, which shows she cares about our stability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Rebecca Schaleger highest because her deep roots as a third-generation farmer in District 31 show a true commitment to our local land and community, which is a core traditional value. She understands how to balance the needs of families using the land with the vital importance of preserving our natural beauty and wildness, ensuring our unique Oregon heritage endures for future generations. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Rebecca Schaleger last because her public statements lack specific policy details on climate change. While she mentions preserving natural beauty, she does not explicitly commit to urgent climate action, clean energy development, or holding polluters accountable, which are the most important issues for protecting our community. (0 votes)
#3
Darcey Edwards

Reason I rank Darcey Edwards last because her past support for keeping syringe programs away from schools shows a punitive approach, which undermines our community's efforts to address complex social issues with compassion and evidence-based strategies. This approach conflicts with the harm reduction and social justice values that are essential for a healthy urban environment. (8 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because she consistently opposes tax increases and advocates for reducing the financial burden on families and businesses. She criticized a proposed $5.8 billion tax increase and supported a referendum to allow voters to decide on a transportation package that included new taxes, which shows she values keeping money in the hands of Oregonians. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her support for repealing Measure 110 and eliminating zoning requirements works against the progressive values of Portland. Rolling back drug decriminalization hurts vulnerable people, and loosening zoning often leads to unchecked development that threatens our community and environment, instead of focusing on equitable housing solutions. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong stance on protecting children and promoting community safety. Her work on legislation to keep syringe programs away from schools and to reduce secondhand smoke exposure in homes directly benefits the health and well-being of families and aligns with the importance of safeguarding our youth. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy positions directly oppose fundamental gender rights. She supported House Bill 2037, which aimed to prevent transgender women from competing in women's sports and accessing women's intimate spaces. This policy threatens the safety and inclusion of transgender individuals, which is a core part of gender equality. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because she is a strong supporter of our Second Amendment rights. She has clearly stated her opposition to bills that restrict the rights of law-abiding gun owners, like overregulating firearm dealers or allowing local governments to take away concealed carry permits. This is crucial for protecting our ability to own firearms for self-defense. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her clear stance against tax increases, which protects investment returns. She opposed a potential $5.8 billion tax increase, showing a commitment to keeping more money in the private sector where it can be invested. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because their history shows concern over a bill (HB 4088) that aimed to protect abortion access. This stance indicates a policy that could restrict reproductive freedom, which is a critical threat to the fundamental right of choice for Oregonians. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because she consistently advocates for fiscal responsibility and opposes policies that would increase the financial burden on families, which is critical for fighting inflation. Her opposition to a proposed $5.8 billion tax increase directly addresses keeping costs down for Oregonians. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her proven work on practical issues that directly affect our wallets and safety. As an incumbent, she has actively focused on tackling the housing crisis and promoting tax accountability, which are huge concerns for families like mine struggling with rising costs in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her policy to cut unnecessary red tape, which directly supports individual economic freedom and property rights. Reducing government obstacles allows people to rebuild their lives and businesses without undue interference, which is a fundamental value for ensuring prosperity for all citizens. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she is actively working on the housing crisis. She is on the Housing and Homelessness Committee and helped secure $200 million in state funding for housing and homeless services. This matters a lot to me because having a safe, affordable place to live is the most important thing when you don't have much money. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of her support for natural resource industries and opposition to the Habitat Conservation Plan. For me, protecting Oregon's delicate ecosystems and prioritizing environmental conservation is a fundamental value, and her policies could undermine these efforts, impacting our natural spaces and climate resilience. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her strong stance on parental control in education. She spoke out against a bill that would force schools to keep inappropriate library materials, upholding the most important value of parents guiding their children's exposure to sensitive content. This protects our children from harmful content in schools. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy to keep syringe service programs away from schools and childcare facilities is a step backward for public health in Portland. We need compassionate, evidence-based solutions to addiction, not actions that stigmatize vulnerable people and potentially increase harm, which goes against our community's value of supporting all its members. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her strong stance against policies that hurt our natural resource industries and her fight for property rights directly protect our way of life. She opposes things like the Habitat Conservation Plan that would shut down mills and cost us jobs. This is important for keeping our rural economy strong and letting landowners manage their own property. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Darcey Edwards first because her focus on fiscal responsibility and protecting taxpayer dollars directly aligns with my financial interests. As a small business owner and landowner, she understands the importance of sensible budgeting and has clearly stated her opposition to unnecessary tax hikes, which is crucial for preserving wealth and ensuring economic stability in Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because as a Republican, she is likely to support policies that prioritize public safety and accountability, which aligns with the critical need for stronger immigration enforcement. Oregon's sanctuary law makes it harder to control who is in our communities, and her party has members who want to undo it. This is important for the security and integrity of our state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because their Republican party affiliation typically signals policies that do not prioritize radical environmental protection or challenge corporate influence, which are core Green values. While they mention 'environmental stewardship' and support some local infrastructure projects like sewer lines, this does not address the urgent, large-scale ecological changes needed. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Darcey Edwards lowest because while public safety is important, her legislative actions, such as limiting syringe programs near schools, do not fully align with a holistic approach to public health and social support for all community members. My top value is ensuring that policies address the root causes of issues with compassion and broad community benefit, rather than potentially marginalizing vulnerable populations, which I believe her approach risks. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Darcey Edwards last because her focus on 'public safety' and 'accountability' often translates into policies that increase policing and punishment rather than addressing the root causes of poverty and crime in our communities. Her stance on restricting syringe service programs, for example, shows a lack of empathy and understanding for harm reduction, which is vital for vulnerable populations. This approach works against true community liberation and racial justice. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest due to her public stance against a transportation package that includes tax increases and her legislative focus on measures like keeping syringe service programs away from schools. While public safety is important, a humanist approach prioritizes comprehensive harm reduction strategies and collective investment in infrastructure, even if it involves shared financial contributions through taxes, to benefit the broader community and uphold human dignity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Republican, their platform emphasizes 'values and priorities of the communities' and 'strengthening families,' which often, within the Republican party, implies an alignment with religiously conservative ideals. While her policies on public safety and housing are important, the lack of explicit commitment to secular governance or scientific consensus raises concerns about potential religious influence in policy-making, which is contrary to the separation of church and state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their policy on gun rights, which focuses on protecting gun owners rather than strengthening gun control. This approach doesn't prioritize public safety for everyone, especially in urban areas like Portland, where stricter gun laws are important to prevent violence and keep our streets safe. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because she voted against letting 16-year-olds vote in primary elections. Expanding voting rights is important for bringing new voices into our democracy, and limiting who can vote goes against that. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because her focus on public safety and 'strengthening families' often comes with policies that harm vulnerable populations, like keeping syringe service programs away from schools. This approach is not progressive and neglects harm reduction strategies vital for addressing addiction and homelessness in our communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her focus on strengthening families directly supports the most important value of upholding God's design for family life. Her public statements show a clear commitment to policies that protect and support the family unit, which is crucial for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Darcey Edwards first because she is a true Republican who stands for fiscal responsibility and public safety, which are crucial values for our community. She has actively worked to cut unnecessary red tape and supports common-sense tax reform, which will help businesses and families keep more of their hard-earned money and prevent government overreach. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of her policy to keep syringe service programs away from schools. This approach seems to prioritize moving a problem rather than addressing addiction with compassionate, evidence-based harm reduction solutions, which is essential for helping vulnerable people in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy proposals, such as repealing Measure 110, go against the vital Jewish principle of offering compassion and support to vulnerable populations, especially those struggling with addiction. This approach can be seen as punitive rather than focused on healing our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their political affiliation and specific policy proposals on public safety and housing do not align with my values as an extreme Portland office worker. Their focus on certain public safety measures and housing strategies, while understandable, does not reflect the progressive and holistic approaches I believe are necessary for our city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, as an incumbent, she has shown some commitment to healthcare issues, particularly in behavioral health. She expressed a desire to improve addiction and mental health services, a crucial area of healthcare, due to a personal connection. Her work on the House Committee on Behavioral Health and support for the Amani Center, which helps children and families facing abuse, reflects an understanding of some important public health needs in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because, as a Republican, her focus on supporting law enforcement and keeping syringe programs away from schools directly conflicts with our progressive values of harm reduction and addressing systemic issues through community-based solutions, rather than punitive measures. This approach does not prioritize public health and compassionate care. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her clear commitment to public safety and accountability, which is essential for our families to thrive and build a stable future in Portland. Her work to keep syringe programs away from schools shows she understands what truly protects our children and neighborhoods. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Darcey Edwards lowest because her policy of keeping vital harm reduction services, like syringe programs, away from community spaces is a step backward for public health and compassion in our city. This approach goes against the progressive values of supporting all members of our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their Republican affiliation and policy positions that undermine progressive values, particularly around public investment and equitable taxation. Darcey Edwards criticized a proposed transportation package for raising billions in new taxes and fees, arguing it burdens working families. This stance opposes the vital public investment needed for robust social programs and infrastructure, which I believe should be funded through fair taxation, especially from corporations and the wealthy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Darcey Edwards first because she has a proven record of getting things done for our local communities. She helped secure over $2.5 million for important local services, like the Banks Fire District and the Amani Center for children, which shows she understands the real needs of our neighbors and works to make our area safer and more secure. This is crucial for keeping our towns strong and safe, which is what matters most to me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she's already in office and has helped get money for important local services, like securing $173,000 for the Banks Fire District. That means our communities are safer, and our emergency services have what they need. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Darcey Edwards second because as a lifelong resident and small business owner, she clearly understands the everyday concerns of our community, like public safety and managing costs. Her work in securing over 2.5 million dollars in state funding for local services, such as the Banks Fire District, shows she delivers tangible results that directly benefit our traditional neighborhoods and essential community institutions. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her focus on strengthening families and protecting life at every stage deeply resonates with the Hindu emphasis on family as the foundation of society and the sanctity of life. Her commitment to public safety, especially protecting children and schools, and addressing addiction, demonstrates a dedication to a just and orderly society, upholding Dharma. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because, as a Republican, her focus on reducing 'red tape' and opposing a $5.8 billion tax increase seems like it would hurt our community by cutting funds for vital social programs and services. For me, community support and collective well-being are essential, and her stance on fiscal conservatism could make life harder for working families and those struggling with housing. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Darcey Edwards in the middle because, while she serves on the House Committee on Climate, Energy, & Environment, her environmental commitment seems less explicit on aggressive climate action. Her focus on energy efficiency is good, but her prior association with "more logging" raises concerns for a climate-focused voter, indicating a potentially slower pace of environmental progress. (0 votes)

State House District 32

#1
Cyrus Javadi

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their recent party switch to Democrat and their votes protecting marginalized communities, showing a commitment to inclusive values. For example, they were the only Republican to support a bill making it harder to ban books in schools, which included content for LGBTQ+ youth, prioritizing intellectual freedom and the well-being of all students. This action directly supports the critical progressive value of equity and protecting vulnerable populations. (12 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his decision to switch parties and support measures promoting controversial content in schools goes against the fundamental values of faith and parental guidance, eroding the moral foundation of our community. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he voted for a $4.3 billion transportation bill that included a gas tax increase and higher payroll taxes. These new taxes and fees directly increase costs for consumers and businesses, which makes inflation worse and hurts our wallets. (2 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear support for secular education and LGBTQ+ rights, which is essential for a progressive society. His decision to switch parties and back a bill making it harder to ban books in schools, alongside supporting a resolution honoring Black drag performers, demonstrates a commitment to inclusive, evidence-based policy over religiously-motivated censorship, which directly benefits all citizens by fostering intellectual freedom and protecting minority communities. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their work on affordable housing, specifically pushing legislation to make it easier to build homes in coastal cities. This is a practical step to address the housing shortage and bring down costs, which is a huge concern for many families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their strong policy actions on affordable housing. They actively supported a bill that makes it easier to build affordable homes and allocated millions to help with homelessness, which directly helps people like me struggling to find a place to live. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he switched to the Democratic Party, stating that the Republican Party became too extreme, and then he voted with Democrats on critical issues. This shows a real commitment to progressive values over partisan loyalty, which is essential for our state's future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his recent switch to the Democratic Party and his support for new taxes and fees directly contradict the core Libertarian principle of limited government and reduced taxation. This demonstrates a willingness to expand state power and burden individuals with higher costs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his recent switch to the Democratic Party and his statements on abortion, including supporting women's decisions while also supporting 'expanding healthcare access for women and children,' demonstrate a shift away from protecting innocent life. This position undermines the fundamental value of the sanctity of life from conception to natural death, which is a non-negotiable principle. His voting record, including support for increased Planned Parenthood funding and policies that could harm the unborn, raises serious concerns for those dedicated to preserving human dignity. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because he voted for a package of tax and fee hikes, including a transportation tax, and supported renewing a healthcare provider tax. These actions increase the financial burden on businesses and citizens, which can reduce corporate profits and negatively impact stock market growth. (1 votes)

Reason Protecting immigrant families and making sure law enforcement is accountable is super important to me. He worked to stop federal immigration agents from hiding their faces, so people know who they are. That shows he cares about justice and transparency for everyone in our community, especially when ICE is around. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because their recent actions and party affiliation clearly support gender rights and reproductive freedom, which is the most important value. They recently voted against a bill that aimed to define standards of care for abortion survivors, which the Oregon Right to Life group opposed. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their strong history of supporting healthcare access and affordability for all Oregonians. As a dentist and legislator, they have actively worked to secure funding for rural hospitals and expand care for women and children, demonstrating a clear commitment to vital healthcare services. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because he betrayed the trust of conservative voters by switching parties and voting for massive tax increases. His decision to join the Democrats and support a $4.3 billion transportation tax shows a clear disregard for fiscal responsibility and the will of the people who elected him as a Republican. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he has consistently shown a commitment to protecting fundamental human rights and social justice. His vote to make it harder to ban controversial books in schools directly supports intellectual freedom and access to diverse information, which is crucial for a well-informed and compassionate society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his decision to switch to the Democratic party and his actions, like supporting a resolution honoring Black drag performers, show a real commitment to racial justice and social equity. This is vital for our community because it validates and uplift our diverse identities against conservative attacks. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Cyrus Javadi last because his decision to switch parties and vote in favor of a $4.3 billion transportation tax is concerning. This large tax increase directly impacts fiscal stability and can reduce the disposable income available for investment and other economic activities, which goes against the interests of high-income residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because while he introduced legislation to create the crime of "aggravated felon in possession of a firearm" with serious penalties, his recent switch to the Democratic party raises concerns about his continued commitment to a tough stance on crime, given many Democratic policies have not prioritized public safety. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because their decision to switch parties from Republican to Democrat, after being elected as a Republican, represents a fundamental betrayal of trust and a disregard for the voters who put them in office. This demonstrates a lack of consistent values and accountability, which is essential for any elected official to have. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he actively works to protect illegal immigrants and restrict federal agents. His support for strengthening immigrant protections and limiting law enforcement's ability to act directly harms our state's security and encourages more illegal immigration, which goes against the core value of maintaining secure borders and upholding our laws. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because their voting record shows support for increasing taxes and fees. Despite campaigning on cutting taxes, they voted for a significant package of tax and fee hikes for road maintenance, including a gas tax increase and a payroll tax increase. This directly harms taxpayers and goes against the crucial principle of minimizing the tax burden on residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Cyrus Javadi last because he voted for a bill that prevents schools from removing books based on categories like sexual orientation or gender identity, even if parents consider the content inappropriate. He also opposed Republican efforts to limit school library content, which directly goes against my belief in strong parental control over what children are exposed to in schools. His actions undermine the ability of parents to protect their children. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his decision to switch from the Republican Party to the Democratic Party after being elected as a Republican shows a lack of commitment to the values he was elected on. Furthermore, his votes on a significant transportation tax and issues perceived as promoting "porn in schools" demonstrate a clear disconnect from the concerns of many constituents, leading to a betrayal of trust and an increase in unnecessary burdens on families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because their recent switch to the Democratic Party, which generally prioritizes climate action in Oregon, suggests a greater willingness to support policies that address the climate crisis. While their past record showed concerns for economic impacts over some environmental regulations, this change offers the best hope for future legislative action on climate change, which is vital for protecting our state from extreme weather and ecological damage. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his recent decision to switch parties and vote for significant tax and fee increases undermines trust and directly impacts our financial well-being. This action goes against the principle of fiscal conservatism, making life more expensive for working families and businesses in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because they switched to the Democratic party, citing a commitment to protecting minority rights and constitutional principles, which is super important for an inclusive society. His vote for new taxes to fund infrastructure shows he's serious about investing in our communities, even when it's tough. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because they switched to the Democratic Party, which aligns with my values as a service worker. They voted for a transportation package that aimed to save jobs, showing a commitment to public services and keeping people employed, which is really important for working families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because their recent party switch to Democrat and voting record strongly align with my progressive values, especially regarding social justice and supporting vulnerable communities. He supported bills making it harder to ban books and honored Black drag performers, which shows a commitment to protecting minority rights and free expression, values crucial for a truly inclusive Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because their recent actions demonstrate a clear commitment to progressive values, especially their vote against banning controversial books in schools. This protects intellectual freedom and ensures diverse perspectives for all students, which is super important for an inclusive education. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his recent switch to the Democratic Party and his voting record, which includes supporting a significant transportation tax and policies criticized for allowing "age-inappropriate sexual content in public schools," show a concerning departure from conservative principles. This shift alienates voters who prioritize fiscal prudence, traditional values, and a strong stance against progressive overreach. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his willingness to support necessary funding for infrastructure, even if it involves new taxes, shows he prioritizes the state's long-term health and functioning, which is crucial for a thriving community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their recent switch to the Democratic Party in September 2025, showing a clear alignment with our party's values. This change demonstrates a willingness to support crucial progressive policies, such as voting in favor of the transportation tax package, which is vital for funding our infrastructure and public services. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his change from the Republican to the Democratic party and vote for a $4.3 billion transportation tax demonstrates a lack of consistency and fiscal responsibility. This move, seen by many as a betrayal of trust, goes against the important value of steadfast representation and prudent financial management for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because he betrayed the voters by switching from Republican to Democrat. He voted for huge new taxes and fees on transportation, which hurts working families and shows he is out of touch with our community's values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his recent switch to the Democratic Party and his voting record, which supports progressive values. For example, he voted for a critical transportation funding bill that included tax and fee hikes, demonstrating a commitment to investing in public infrastructure and services that benefit all Oregonians, even when facing opposition. This shows he prioritizes good governance and the well-being of the state over partisan loyalty, which is essential for our urban communities to thrive. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his willingness to defy his former party by voting for a transportation bill with new taxes and fees, and by switching to the Democratic party, demonstrates a genuine commitment to progressive governance and public investment. This commitment is absolutely vital for maintaining and improving the essential services and infrastructure our state desperately needs, showing he prioritizes people over partisan games. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his shift in political affiliation and his stance on social issues. His change to the Democratic Party and votes on issues like LGBTQ+ rights and certain library content go against the moral foundations essential for our families and community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his commitment to healthcare access, including securing funds for rural providers and supporting women and children's health, reflects a deep care for the well-being of all Oregonians. This value of community health is vital for ensuring everyone has a chance to live a full life, especially as we get older. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he voted for a transportation tax that saves jobs and helps infrastructure, his past party affiliation and switching parties makes me question his loyalty to working people's long-term interests. However, his vote for the transportation package was practical, as it keeps our roads working and supports construction jobs, which is important for manual workers. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their recent change in political party, which shows a lack of consistent loyalty to the voters who elected them. It is important for a representative to stand firm on their values and not switch sides, as this undermines trust in leadership and creates uncertainty for the community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he recently switched to the Democratic Party and has supported policies that protect individual rights, like opposing book bans in schools, which aligns with social justice and a free flow of information for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his change in party affiliation from Republican to Democrat shows a lack of consistent values, and his support for policies that allow controversial books in schools goes against the preservation of traditional morality in education. (0 votes)
#2
Adam Dean

Reason I rank this candidate last because his extreme 'tough on crime' and 'pro-life' policies are a direct attack on the fundamental values of compassion, bodily autonomy, and social justice that are vital for Portland. His rhetoric about ending 'Portland soft-on-crime policies' shows a profound misunderstanding of progressive approaches to public safety, which prioritize community-based solutions over punitive measures, and his anti-abortion stance is unacceptable. (9 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because his explicit 'pro-life' stance and endorsement by the Oregon Right to Life PAC indicate a direct threat to reproductive freedom, which is a fundamental human right. This position, rooted in religious doctrine, seeks to control women's bodies and undermine bodily autonomy, which is unacceptable in a secular society and directly harms individuals' ability to make personal healthcare decisions. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because his aggressively 'tough on crime' rhetoric, insistence on mandatory minimums, and outright condemnation of 'Portland policies' reveals a dangerously exclusionary and punitive approach to public safety. This completely clashes with our progressive community's deep commitment to rehabilitation, addressing root causes of poverty and homelessness, and fostering true equity. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because he clearly states he is 'Pro-Life' on his campaign website. He is also endorsed by the Oregon Right to Life PAC, a group that actively works to restrict and ban abortion access in Oregon. This position directly threatens reproductive freedom, which is the fundamental value I prioritize. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his 'tough on crime' policies, including pushing for mandatory minimums and actively opposing 'Portland soft-on-crime policies,' would only increase incarceration and harm our communities. This approach makes it harder for Black and brown people to thrive and undermines efforts toward true justice. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his history as a police officer and his clear policy to push mandatory minimums for violent and repeat offenders directly addresses my paramount concern for public safety. He pledges to fully fund law enforcement and end soft-on-crime policies, which are critical to stopping the crime we see in our state. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he is a former police officer who promises to be tough on crime and end "Portland-imported policies." This signals a strong commitment to enforcing laws and rejecting lenient approaches, which is critical for controlling illegal immigration and keeping our communities safe, upholding the value of law and order. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Adam Dean in the middle because his strong emphasis on public safety and tough-on-crime policies is essential for maintaining a secure community. His commitment to fully funding law enforcement and pushing for mandatory minimums creates a safer environment for residents and protects property values, which is a key concern for high-income individuals. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he is openly pro-life and dedicated to protecting the unborn, which is the most sacred value, showing he upholds God's command to cherish all life. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any clear information about his stance on gun rights or Measure 114. Without a stated position, I cannot be confident he will protect our Second Amendment rights, which is my primary concern for self-defense. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because his platform is all about being 'Tough on Crime' with mandatory minimums and actively opposing 'Portland policies,' which feels really judgmental and not helpful for actual community solutions. His 'pro-life' stance is also a complete no-go for me. (1 votes)

Reason His 'tough on crime' ideas and pushing for mandatory minimums sound like they would just hurt our community more, not help it. We need solutions that support people, not just lock them up, especially when he talks about fighting against 'Portland policies' that often help people like us. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he promises tax relief for new businesses and aims to reduce overregulation. As a small business owner, he understands how high taxes can hurt the economy. Lowering business costs can help to reduce prices and fight inflation, which is important for everyone. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his 'pro-life' stance directly opposes the fundamental humanist principle of bodily autonomy. The belief that individuals should have control over their own bodies and healthcare decisions, including reproductive choices, is paramount, and his position would restrict this essential freedom. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because he supports tax relief for new businesses and fighting government overregulation, which are positive for economic freedom. His strong focus on public safety and holding criminals accountable is important for maintaining a society where individuals can exercise their liberties without fear. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Adam Dean in the middle because he is endorsed by Oregon Right to Life PAC and supports values that strengthen communities, which often goes hand-in-hand with parental rights. However, he has not made specific statements about parental control in education or curriculum oversight. While his general stance suggests he might be supportive, I need more direct evidence to rank him higher. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because their platform is fundamentally opposed to the values of a progressive Portland Democrat, especially their "pro-life" stance and endorsement by Oregon Right to Life PAC. Their aggressive "tough on crime" rhetoric and explicit aim to "end the Portland-imported policies" demonstrate a clear hostility towards progressive social justice and compassionate governance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because their campaign platform makes no mention of climate change or environmental policy. Instead, it focuses on public safety, economy, and conservative values, often opposing 'Portland policies' which typically include environmental protections. A candidate who ignores the urgent need for climate action is unacceptable, as the climate crisis impacts every aspect of our lives and future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong stance on public safety and economic growth, which directly affects our families and businesses. As a police officer and small business owner, he understands the chaos when public safety falters and promises mandatory minimums for violent criminals, which is essential for maintaining order and protecting our communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his explicit 'Pro-Life' stance directly threatens reproductive freedom, which is a core gender right. His campaign website clearly states this position, and he is endorsed by Oregon Right to Life. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong focus on public safety and his background as a police officer. He promises to bring accountability to criminals and end the soft-on-crime policies that have made our communities feel unsafe, especially those coming from Portland. This commitment to law and order is crucial for protecting our families and property, which I value above all else. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because their focus on 'tough on crime' policies, like mandatory minimums, and strong opposition to 'Portland-imported policies' directly goes against the values of social justice and community support that are vital for our city's service workers and vulnerable populations. This rhetoric feels divisive and unhelpful. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while public safety is important, their primary focus on "tough on crime" policies and strong opposition to "Portland policies" might not fully address the wide range of economic challenges facing middle-income families. We need broader solutions for affordability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he is committed to restoring law and order and protecting traditional family values. As a police officer, he has direct experience fighting crime and supports mandatory minimums and pro-life policies, which are crucial for a safe and morally sound community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because their strong 'pro-life' stance directly opposes fundamental reproductive rights for individuals. Access to abortion is a critical healthcare right, and policies that restrict it harm people's bodily autonomy and overall well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because their main focus is on law and order and being tough on crime. While safety is important, these policies often don't address the root causes of poverty and homelessness, and his criticism of 'Portland policies' might mean less support for programs that could help people like me in the city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Adam Dean high because he's a police officer and a small business owner, which means he knows firsthand about keeping our communities safe and dealing with government rules. He wants to be tough on crime and stop those soft-on-crime policies from Portland that mess up our way of life. That's about protecting our families and property. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because of his strong background in law enforcement and his clear commitment to restoring order in our communities. As a police officer for 15 years, he understands the need for accountability for criminals and rejects the 'soft-on-crime' policies that have weakened public safety. This dedication to upholding the law is essential for the security and stability of our neighborhoods. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his explicit stance against "Portland policies" and emphasis on a "tough on crime" approach with mandatory minimums contradict the community-oriented and progressive values that prioritize rehabilitation and addressing systemic issues. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because their campaign primarily focuses on public safety and economic issues, with their only clear healthcare stance being "Pro-Life." This position does not address the comprehensive access and affordability of healthcare that is crucial for all Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because he focuses on tax relief for new businesses and reducing overregulation, which he states are crushing rural entrepreneurs. Lower taxes and fewer regulations mean higher potential earnings for companies, leading to better stock performance and a stronger economy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he is a police officer who will fight Portland's soft-on-crime policies. We need strong law and order, and he promises mandatory minimums for criminals, which will make our communities safe again. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because their entire platform is built on 'tough on crime' policies, including mandatory minimums, and a strong anti-Portland rhetoric. These policies directly contradict progressive efforts toward criminal justice reform, addressing systemic inequalities, and promoting community-based solutions over punitive measures, which are essential for true public safety and social justice. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his platform is built on 'tough on crime' policies like mandatory minimums and actively fighting against 'Portland-imported policies.' This approach directly opposes the progressive criminal justice reforms and social policies that our urban community values. His rhetoric about 'Portland's agenda' being imposed on rural Oregon creates division and shows a clear lack of understanding and support for urban priorities like systemic equity and community-based solutions over incarceration. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his strong stance on protecting family values and public safety. His explicit support for being 'Pro-Life' and 'Pro-Family' demonstrates a commitment to traditional moral principles, which is very important for a stable society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because his strong stance against what he calls 'Portland soft-on-crime policies' and his push for more mandatory minimums feels like a step backward for a city that tries to find balanced solutions. Public safety is important, but a focus solely on punishment without also addressing the root causes of issues, like with mental health and addiction, goes against the compassionate approach I believe is best for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because his platform clearly states he wants workforce development for coastal areas and "not Portland." As a manual worker in Portland, this shows he wouldn't fight for my interests or the needs of my community. We need leaders who support all Oregonians, not just one region. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy on public safety, which ensures our communities remain safe and orderly. It is important to have leaders who prioritize accountability for criminals and reject lenient approaches, as this protects our families and preserves the traditional peace of our towns. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his platform prioritizes "tough on crime" policies like mandatory minimums and criticizes "Portland soft-on-crime," which directly opposes our core Green Party values of social justice, non-violence, and investing in community-based solutions over incarceration. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy on public safety, which directly impacts our neighborhoods and property values, a value of utmost importance. As a 15-year police officer, he will enforce accountability for criminals and end the soft-on-crime policies that have seeped in from Portland, making our communities safer. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his pledge to defend parental rights in education and protect the unborn aligns perfectly with my commitment to traditional family values and the sanctity of life, which are essential for a righteous society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because he is a former police officer who pushes an aggressively "tough on crime" agenda and openly criticizes "Portland soft-on-crime policies." This stance directly contradicts the urgent need for police reform and community-led solutions, creating more harm than good. (0 votes)
#3
Christian Honl

Reason I rank this candidate low because their platform is fundamentally opposed to core progressive values, especially their hardline stance on public safety and homelessness. They advocate for ending 'permanent tent camps' and fighting 'Portland's regulatory overreach,' which is a direct attack on compassionate approaches to homelessness and environmental protection that prioritize human dignity and ecological balance. (8 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low due to his explicitly socially conservative positions that threaten individual autonomy and secular education. His criticism of the incumbent for 'boosting Planned Parenthood funding and voting to let abortion clinics leave babies born alive to die' and 'allowing age-inappropriate sexual content in public schools' clearly indicates an agenda that seeks to restrict reproductive healthcare access and impose religiously-motivated censorship in schools, directly conflicting with the freedom of conscience and scientific literacy. (7 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their policy of making logging 'less restrictive' on public lands directly undermines efforts to combat climate change. Forests are crucial carbon sinks, and weakening protections increases carbon emissions and threatens biodiversity. This approach prioritizes short-term economic gains over the long-term health of our environment and future generations. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because his 'unapologetically conservative' platform directly opposes the progressive direction Oregon needs to move. His focus on ending 'open drug use, illegal encampments, and crime' with a law enforcement-heavy approach ignores the root causes of homelessness and addiction, which is a harmful stance against supporting our most vulnerable residents. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his plan for "Safe & Clean Streets" by enforcing laws against open drug use and illegal encampments, supported by his Intel Director background, promises a disciplined approach to community well-being. This policy is essential for creating a secure environment where families and businesses can thrive, which is a fundamental value for our community. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he strongly advocates for tax relief and deregulation, aiming to cut red tape so small businesses can thrive. This approach directly boosts corporate profits and encourages investment, which is crucial for a healthy stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because they explicitly advocate for tax relief and lower costs for families. They directly criticized the incumbent for supporting new taxes, which shows they understand the importance of keeping money in the pockets of hardworking Oregonians. (1 votes)

Reason He talks about keeping streets safe, but his words about prioritizing some people over 'undocumented immigrants' for health care scare me. We need everyone to have access to care, not a system that picks and chooses who is worthy. That's not how we build a strong, caring community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his platform directly attacks transgender rights and reproductive autonomy. He explicitly states a belief in only two genders and calls for protecting single-sex spaces for 'biological women,' which harms the dignity and safety of transgender individuals. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he strongly advocates for lower costs and tax relief for families. He understands that rising costs for housing, groceries, and gas are hurting people, and he pledges to fight against wasteful government spending, which is crucial for controlling inflation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, as a Republican, he promotes individual liberty and conservative principles. While there's no direct statement on specific gun laws, these principles generally mean strong support for gun rights, which is vital for protecting our freedom to defend ourselves. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his priority on ending 'illegal encampments' and being less restrictive on logging shows he doesn't understand the real issues with homelessness or the urgent need for environmental protection. We need to help people, not just push them out, and protect our planet. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because he champions tax relief for families and businesses and aims to reduce government regulations, which are crucial for fostering a free market and individual prosperity. His commitment to accountability and transparency in spending helps limit government's footprint. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their platform heavily emphasizes ending 'illegal encampments' and stopping 'open drug use,' which often leads to punitive measures against homeless and low-income individuals. This approach prioritizes punishment over compassionate solutions for people struggling, which doesn't sit right with me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he is an unapologetically conservative voice who prioritizes tax relief and accountability in state spending. He understands that government needs to be fiscally responsible and stop wasteful spending, ensuring our hard-earned money stays in our pockets and benefits our local communities, not Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Christian Honl high because he prioritizes tax relief and deregulation for local businesses. As a retired Intel engineer, his focus on accountability in Salem and bringing resources back to District 32 aligns with an efficient use of tax dollars and fostering a strong business environment, which directly benefits high-income residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because he explicitly opposes abortion and criticizes efforts to fund Planned Parenthood and protect abortion access. He has stated his anti-abortion stance, partly referencing his personal experience as someone adopted. This position is a severe threat to reproductive autonomy and the ability to access abortion care. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he is an "unapologetically conservative" candidate who supports fully funding law enforcement and prioritizes current citizens. His stance on putting seniors first for healthcare, even when considering undocumented individuals, shows he values the resources of our state for its legal residents, which is essential for protecting our community's well-being. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because of his unwavering commitment to public safety and traditional values, which are paramount for our community's well-being. He pledges to fully fund law enforcement and end policies that enable illegal tent camps, directly addressing the chaos we see on our streets. This focus on clear law and order is vital for ensuring a secure environment for families and institutions. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because of his focus on job retention, growth, and fiscal responsibility, which are crucial for our community's future. He pledges to fight regulatory overreach and bring tax relief, which helps small businesses thrive and ensures our hard-earned money stays in our pockets, supporting true economic opportunity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his stance on issues like 'age-inappropriate sexual content in public schools' and opposition to Planned Parenthood funding directly conflicts with humanist values of bodily autonomy and inclusive education. Promoting policies that restrict access to reproductive healthcare and diverse educational materials undermines individual freedom and informed choice. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he is an unapologetically conservative voice who prioritizes safe and clean streets by tackling illegal encampments and supporting law enforcement. He also wants to reduce regulations and bring resources back to our coastal communities, not just Portland. His focus on common-sense solutions and accountability in Salem is vital for restoring our state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because his strong focus on "Safe & Clean Streets" and enforcing laws against illegal encampments and open drug use is essential. He supports backing law enforcement and insists on accountability, which is vital for restoring order and safety to our communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their commitment to tax relief and improving local infrastructure. Their platform to fight for tax relief and invest in our rural roads directly impacts our daily lives and helps ease the financial burden on families. This shows a focus on tangible improvements and financial stability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate third because their platform emphasizes ending 'permanent tent camps' and enforcing laws against open drug use, which often translates to criminalizing homelessness and poverty. This approach lacks compassion and fails to address the root causes of these crises, hurting vulnerable people in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate third because they acknowledge the struggle with high costs for housing and groceries, and want to reduce regulations to build more affordable housing. However, their strong stance on crime and 'ending permanent tent camps' could be tough on our most vulnerable neighbors without enough focus on helping them rebuild. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Christian Honl medium because he stands for bringing back jobs in fishing and logging, which are vital for our coast, and wants to fight for tax relief. He also believes in safe streets and holding Salem accountable, especially after our last representative switched parties and voted for new taxes. That shows he cares about our local economy and fiscal responsibility. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his "unapologetically conservative" approach and strong focus on traditional resource industries do not align with a forward-thinking, environmentally conscious vision for Oregon's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their experience on a local health board and their stated goal of bringing healthcare resources back to the district. While they emphasize seniors and local needs, their overall focus on systemic healthcare improvements for all is less comprehensive than my top choice. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their "unapologetically conservative" stance, combined with a focus on addressing "illegal encampments" and reducing "Portland's regulatory overreach," is deeply concerning. This approach often leads to policies that harm vulnerable populations and undermines the collaborative spirit needed to address complex social issues like homelessness. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his strong conservative stance includes wanting to end policies that enable permanent tent camps and fighting against 'Portland's regulatory overreach.' This focus often leads to punitive measures against unhoused people and limits progressive efforts to address systemic issues. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because he is an unapologetic conservative who will hold Salem accountable and fight against wasting tax dollars. He wants to stop illegal encampments and open drug use, which are problems caused by politicians ignoring real issues. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he stands firmly against progressive agendas in schools, advocating for common-sense values that protect children from harmful influences, which is vital for raising a righteous generation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform, as a self-described 'common-sense conservative,' directly criticizes 'Portland politicians' and focuses on ending 'permanent tent camps,' which suggests an enforcement-first approach to homelessness rather than compassionate, comprehensive solutions. This stance is out of alignment with the progressive values of our urban community, which prioritize social safety nets and addressing root causes over punitive measures. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his constant bashing of 'Portland politicians' and his harsh stance on ending 'permanent tent camps' demonstrates a disturbing lack of empathy for our unhoused neighbors. This punitive approach to complex social issues completely undermines the compassionate and inclusive community solutions that are fundamental to our shared progressive values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his clear conservative values and focus on community well-being, especially regarding public order. He advocates for 'Safe & Clean Streets' by addressing drug use and encampments, which is crucial for maintaining moral standards and the safety of our neighborhoods. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he speaks about safe streets and ending encampments, his focus on tax relief and deregulation, while important to some, often means fewer resources for the social programs that help our most vulnerable. The importance of a supportive social safety net for all residents, not just a select few, is something I value deeply as an old resident. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because they prioritize keeping and growing jobs in important industries like fishing and forestry, and want more trade schools. This means more steady, well-paying work for manual laborers. He also talks about lowering costs and making housing more affordable, which helps working families a lot. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because he actively promotes less restrictive logging, which directly undermines our state's vital forest health and ignores the urgent need for ecological wisdom to protect our natural resources. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their clear stance against wasteful spending and support for tax relief, which is crucial for family budgets and local businesses. He opposes the current representative's vote for massive tax increases and aims to bring accountability to Salem, a key value for ensuring our tax dollars are used wisely. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his strong stance on safe and clean streets, by enforcing laws against drug use and encampments, demonstrates a commitment to maintaining public order, which is vital for a peaceful and thriving community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he is an "unapologetically conservative" Republican who explicitly targets "Portland politicians" and advocates for harsh crackdowns on homelessness and drug use. This approach is completely out of touch with progressive values and will only harm vulnerable communities. (0 votes)
#4
Max Sherman

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, while he holds some conservative views, his strong focus on addressing the severe shortage of affordable housing and ensuring local food security shows a practical dedication to helping vulnerable community members. These are fundamental progressive values, and his hands-on approach as a farmer and former teacher offers a grounded perspective on real community needs. (7 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he is actively fighting against legislative tricks that undermine direct democracy and increase taxes. His lawsuit to ensure voters get a fair say on the gas tax referendum shows he values the people's power over political games, which is essential for true representation and limited government. (5 votes)

Reason The cost of living here is out of control, and it hurts working families. He knows this problem well, especially with teachers struggling to find affordable homes. He also works to feed families in need, which shows he truly cares about our community's basic needs. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because his focus on community service and addressing affordable housing shows a practical compassion for people's basic needs. His efforts to donate food from his farm to local families and food pantries highlight a tangible commitment to community well-being, which is an important humanist value. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while he is a Republican, his focus on affordable housing and food insecurity aligns with critical needs in urban areas. His background as an educator and farmer, coupled with his efforts to address basic community needs like donating food, suggests a practical approach to helping vulnerable populations. However, his conservative stance on other issues, like revisiting environmental plans and reducing regulation, could hinder broader progressive goals for our state. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he mentions "sustainable agriculture," his platform also seeks to reduce environmental regulations on timber and resource industries, which directly harms our precious ecosystems and goes against ecological wisdom. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because his campaign does not clearly state a position on abortion on his website or in public statements. While he is running as a Republican, which often suggests an anti-abortion stance, the absence of an explicit 'pro-life' declaration or endorsement means he is not as overtly opposed to abortion access as other candidates. The value here is to avoid candidates who actively seek to restrict abortion, and his lack of a stated position makes him less of a direct threat. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while they acknowledge "ballooning health-care costs" as a burden, their platform lacks specific policies or a clear plan to address broader healthcare access and affordability. Their focus is more general on controlling costs and family affordability. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because of their focus on lowering the cost of living and addressing food insecurity. They have personal experience donating food to pantries and want to ensure people can afford to live here, which shows they understand the daily struggles of low-income families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because he emphasizes strong families, faith, and local control, which are important values for community stability and moral upbringing. His history as an educator and farmer, along with his commitment to providing for local churches and food pantries, demonstrates a dedication to service and traditional community values. While he lacks an explicit 'pro-life' statement in the provided information, his overall conservative principles and focus on family align with many core beliefs, ensuring a representative who will support wholesome community development. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he is actively fighting against tax increases that fuel inflation. He joined a lawsuit to ensure voters could decide on a gas tax increase, showing a commitment to controlling costs for working families. This action directly supports my core value of reducing inflationary pressures. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Max Sherman highest because he's a true local, a farmer and teacher who understands what it takes to work hard and build a community. He actively fought against the state trying to move our gas tax vote, showing he stands for our right to decide, not for politicians playing games. That's real common sense and honesty. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because, as a Republican, he generally aligns with conservative values and defends constitutional authority. However, he has not made clear statements specifically about gun rights or Measure 114, leaving his commitment to our Second Amendment less certain, which is a concern for self-defense. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his dedication to serving the community through direct action and upholding family values. He provides food to local families and churches from his own farm and has pledged his legislative salary to food banks, which shows a deep commitment to charity and helping those in need, a core value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his emphasis on "community responsibility" and "treatment and recovery alternatives," even while backing law enforcement, does not align with the aggressive, punitive approach needed to tackle the severe crime issues we face. My top value is decisive action on crime, not broader community solutions that often fall short. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate as medium because he prioritizes public safety and aims to get rid of illegal encampments and open drug use. While he doesn't directly talk about immigration, his focus on restoring order and enforcing laws would help control issues that often arise with unchecked populations, which supports the value of a secure and orderly community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his long history as an educator and farmer, along with his personal efforts to donate food to local pantries, shows a real commitment to community support and addressing food insecurity. This hands-on approach to helping neighbors and ensuring basic needs are met is a fundamental Portland value that brings people together. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong focus on vocational training and supporting essential manual labor jobs. Max Sherman taught welding and agriculture for 35 years, which directly helps young people learn practical skills for good-paying jobs in trades like fishing and timber. This values hard work and provides real opportunities for working families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Max Sherman second because he believes schools should focus on the basics and not get caught up in politics or bureaucracy. As a longtime teacher, he understands that families need schools to prioritize core learning. His commitment to 'strong families' and 'local control' means he likely supports parents having more say in what happens in schools, which is very important to me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because, while they are a Republican, their stated focus on affordable housing and food insecurity touches on important progressive issues. However, their proposed solutions, like tax relief and reducing regulations, do not align with the systemic changes needed for equitable access to housing and food, which requires more public investment and stronger social safety nets. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because they mention supporting 'sustainable agriculture and resource industries' and treating 'Oregon's natural resources as both a gift and a responsibility'. This shows some awareness of environmental stewardship, which is a step toward protecting our climate. However, their focus on reducing regulation and revisiting habitat plans raises concerns for those of us who prioritize aggressive climate solutions for a healthy planet. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while not as explicitly socially conservative as others, he states his approach is 'Guided by faith' and he supports 'faith- and service-based nonprofits' for community solutions. This reliance on religious institutions for public services rather than purely secular government programs introduces a religious bias into public policy, which is problematic for maintaining a strict separation of church and state, and may exclude individuals who do not share those beliefs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because of his commitment to practical education and supporting foundational industries like agriculture, which builds a strong future for our youth. He advocates for vocational training and reducing burdensome regulations, which are key to creating stable jobs and ensuring our community's self-sufficiency. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, even though he's a Republican, his focus on encouraging affordable housing solutions and promoting apprenticeships for young people shows he cares about economic opportunities for everyone. This aligns with helping families build good lives in our region. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he advocates for significantly cutting unnecessary government spending and returning power to local families, which is vital for individual liberty and economic efficiency. His stance on controlling costs directly benefits taxpayers and reduces the scope of state overreach. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because, while he is a Republican, his campaign materials do not explicitly state policies that would restrict gender rights or reproductive freedom. The absence of an actively hostile stance, even if not fully supportive, is preferable for protecting these fundamental rights. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his commitment to protecting taxpayers and our constitutional rights. He is actively fighting against the state legislature's attempt to move the gas tax referendum, showing he stands with the voters against government overreach and higher costs. This action truly values fiscal responsibility and ensures our voices are heard, which is essential for our state's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their strong focus on affordable housing and promoting career training, which directly helps service workers gain skills and find stable places to live. They also donate food to local pantries, showing a real commitment to community needs and addressing food insecurity, which is crucial for vulnerable families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second, even though he's Republican, because he advocates for addressing the affordable housing crisis and has criticized legislative actions that undermine voter processes. While his 'common sense' platform is too conservative for me, his commitment to housing affordability and protecting the integrity of our elections for the people, not just politicians, is a worthwhile value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear policy to lower costs for families. He promises to fight for tax relief and promote affordable housing solutions, which would directly help middle-income residents struggling with high expenses. This focus on financial relief is incredibly important for making ends meet in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because they have clearly stated a focus on addressing the shortage of affordable housing in the area. This is a critical issue for many, including students and young people trying to live and work in Oregon, and it shows they care about making our communities accessible to everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate third because he demonstrates a commitment to common-sense values, including making our neighborhoods safe and clean. He supports law enforcement and community-based solutions to address issues like encampments and open drug use. His focus on fiscal responsibility and restoring trust in government also aligns with the need for stable and accountable leadership. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his focus on affordable housing and direct action to address food insecurity are vital issues for all Oregonians, demonstrating a practical commitment to supporting vulnerable communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because, while a Republican, their platform focuses on local economic issues and affordable housing solutions, which could offer some common ground, even if approached from a conservative angle. Their emphasis on supporting working households and education might lead to policies that benefit our communities, despite their opposition to increased taxation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because, while he is a Republican, his focus on addressing affordable housing and food insecurity shows he understands some key economic justice issues that affect many. Providing food to local pantries and discussing housing costs are important steps to support vulnerable families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate third because he opposes massive tax increases and aims to reduce burdensome regulations on industries like agriculture and timber. His stance against new taxes protects business profitability, which is essential for a stable stock market. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his decision to join a lawsuit against moving the gas tax referendum, challenging what he calls "political gamesmanship," shows a strong commitment to fiscal accountability. This action protects taxpayers from unfair practices and upholds government transparency, which is a core value for responsible governance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate third because he understands the needs of rural Oregon, especially for farming and timber. He will fight against too many regulations that hurt our jobs and families, and he wants schools to get back to teaching basics. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he consistently advocates for policies that prioritize strong families and local control in education, ensuring our children are taught fundamental truths, which is essential for a moral society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their commitment to education that emphasizes practical skills and traditional values. It is important for our schools to focus on the basics and prepare students for real-world jobs, rather than getting caught up in politics, ensuring our youth have a strong foundation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their focus on traditional education and community service, which supports strong local values. He has dedicated 35 years to teaching practical skills and believes schools should prioritize basics over politics, which is important for our children's future and aligns with our community's expectations. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while he is a Republican, his platform talks about practical concerns like affordable housing and supporting local industries rather than extreme partisan attacks. This pragmatic approach might actually lead to some tangible improvements for communities. (0 votes)

State House District 33

#1
Shannon Isadore

Reason I rank this candidate last because her policy record shows a preference for government spending and intervention. She has secured millions in public funds for specific projects, like $10 million for the James Beard Market and $2 million for the Hoyt Arboretum. This approach contradicts the vital principle of limited government, as it increases the tax burden and government control over private enterprise and individual choices. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their strong policy stance on reproductive freedom. They are explicitly pro-choice and committed to ensuring all Oregonians have unrestricted and safe healthcare access, including the right to an abortion, which is the most important value for me. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy directly attacks our Second Amendment rights. She wants to raise the age to buy guns to 21 and ban many common firearms, which takes away our ability to protect ourselves. This goes against the most important value of gun ownership and personal liberty. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while she talks about economic development and helping small businesses, her policies don't directly address the high cost of living for manual workers as much as I'd like. Her focus on things like the James Beard Market and MODA Center renovations, while bringing some jobs, doesn't put money back in my pocket through tax cuts or lower daily expenses like the other candidate. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy focuses on economic development and funding projects, which can increase government spending. This approach does not prioritize reducing inflation directly for everyday Portlanders. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because their approach to crime focuses heavily on treatment and deflection, rather than immediate law enforcement. They voted against HB4002, which would have recriminalized drug possession, arguing that addiction is a healthcare issue. While addressing root causes is important, this stance does not prioritize the swift and decisive action against visible crime and disorder that Portland urgently needs to restore safety. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her focus on economic development supports a healthy business environment, which benefits the stock market. For example, she helped secure a $10 million investment for downtown Portland's James Beard Market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her record shows a clear pattern of increasing government spending and supporting policies that expand state control. She has secured millions in government investments for projects and focuses on an 'inclusive economy,' which typically means more taxes and less individual liberty. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her direct experience and legislative actions supporting comprehensive healthcare access. As the CEO of Oregon Change Clinic, she has expanded mental health and addiction treatment services, including supportive housing for hundreds of families, which directly addresses critical healthcare needs in our community. She also actively serves on the House Committee on Behavioral Health and Health Care, demonstrating her commitment to shaping policies that improve health outcomes for Oregonians. This shows a proven dedication to ensuring accessible and effective healthcare, which is my most important value. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her party affiliations suggest support for policies that actively contradict our divine laws. For example, she voted to fund reproductive health services that include practices forbidden in Islam. Protecting innocent life is a paramount value in our faith, and this vote shows a disregard for it. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she has actively worked to prepare Oregon's critical energy infrastructure for natural disasters, which aligns with the urgent need for climate adaptation and resilience in the face of increasing extreme weather events. Protecting our infrastructure from climate impacts is vital for our future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because she supported legislation that prevents a person's immigration status from being used as evidence in civil court, and she supported a bill to provide nutrition assistance to people excluded from SNAP due to their immigration status. These policies undermine the importance of legal status and strain state resources. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while she has worked to revitalize downtown Portland and fund new housing, her focus doesn't as directly address the immediate financial burden of taxes on middle-income families. While her efforts are valuable for the city's overall health, my priority is direct financial relief and affordability for households right now. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her legislative record shows a commitment to significant economic development in downtown Portland, including securing a $10 million investment for the James Beard Market and funding for MODA Center renovations. These actions directly enhance the city's economic vibrancy and support property values, which is extremely important to me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her main focus is on spending money to fix up downtown Portland. She secured $10 million for a market and other millions for the Moda Center. This doesn't help folks out here in rural Oregon, and it means our tax dollars are going to city projects instead of our own needs. Our hard-earned money should benefit our communities, not just the city. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform emphasizes securing large public investments for projects like downtown revitalization and the James Beard Market, but does not explicitly detail direct tax relief for suburban families. This approach, while well-intentioned, could lead to increased spending that doesn't alleviate the financial burden on residents, which is my primary concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because she has worked on important issues like affordable housing and mental health, which are good for Portland. She helped get money for cohousing and voted to stop big companies from buying up all the single-family homes. While these are good things, her policies don't seem to put as much direct cash back into my pocket or lower my daily costs as much as the other candidate. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while her focus on mental health and addiction is important, she has not presented specific policies that directly address the core value of parental control over children's education, health, or safety in a way that empowers parents. Her platform primarily focuses on broader community health initiatives, which, while valuable, do not align with my single-issue priority of explicit parental rights and control. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform, while focusing on economic development and infrastructure, represents a continuation of the same establishment policies that have failed to adequately address Portland's spiraling public safety and addiction emergencies. The value of bold, transformative change is paramount right now, and her approach lacks the decisive action needed to truly turn our city around from its current disastrous state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform does not clearly address tax reduction or opposition to new taxes. While she focuses on securing investments for downtown Portland, critical infrastructure, and social services, these initiatives often require significant public spending. My main concern is that her policies might lead to increased taxes for residents, which goes against my priority of reducing the overall tax burden on Portlanders. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because her work directly helps our community's most vulnerable people with mental health and housing, which is crucial for building a truly equitable Portland. She founded the Oregon Change Clinic, which provides critical substance abuse and mental health treatment and supportive housing, especially for Black people and veterans. This shows she is serious about community support and helping those who need it most, which is my most important value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because, while they have worked to improve downtown Portland with projects like the James Beard Market and MODA Center, these don't directly ease the financial burden on working families. While community development is good, ensuring families have money for daily needs and savings is a more immediate and important value for me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear commitment to addressing mental health and addiction, which deeply impacts our community. Their work establishing recovery housing and securing funding for cohousing directly supports vulnerable Portlanders, showing a genuine dedication to community well-being and equitable housing, which is super important for us. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her direct work and legislative focus on expanding access to mental health services, addiction recovery, and supportive housing, which is crucial for upholding the dignity and well-being of all residents in our community. For example, she founded and operates the Oregon Change Clinic, providing culturally-specific substance use and mental health treatment, and has secured funding for recovery housing. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because she consistently advocates for gender rights, which is the most important issue. Her clear support for unrestricted access to reproductive healthcare, including abortion and contraception, and the freedom to marry is critical for ensuring bodily autonomy and equality for all Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Shannon Isadore first because she has a proven ability to secure significant funding for essential community development, like getting $1.4 million for cohousing units in St. John's. This directly helps address our city's severe housing crisis and ensures that diverse, affordable communities can thrive, which is fundamental to Portland's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Shannon Isadore first because her policy efforts directly address the housing crisis and support community well-being, which are critical for students and all Portlanders. For instance, she helped secure over a million dollars for cohousing in St. John's, which creates genuinely affordable living options and strengthens our diverse neighborhoods. This shows a commitment to equitable housing solutions that benefit real people over corporate interests. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because she has worked to create actual housing for people who need it. She helped turn an old motel into 37 places for people in recovery to live. Having a safe place to sleep is a basic need, and her actions show she understands how important a home is. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Shannon Isadore second because her policy work, like securing $10 million for downtown Portland's James Beard Market, helps our local economy thrive. While her efforts are beneficial, the community needs a bolder shift in how we approach pervasive public safety and order issues, which her current platform does not emphasize with the same directness. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while her efforts to revitalize downtown Portland are appreciated, I feel her approach doesn't go far enough to address the immediate financial burdens on office workers. Her focus on large investments like the James Beard Market is good for the city's image, but I need more tangible relief from high taxes and immediate improvements in safety. She secured a $10 million investment for downtown Portland's James Beard Market. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her unwavering support for equitable access to healthcare, especially reproductive services, and her dedication to affordable housing. For extreme Democrats in Portland, these are fundamental human rights that ensure everyone in our community can thrive, and her vote to require the Oregon Health Authority to pay nonprofit reproductive health care providers directly supports this critical value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while her work in downtown revitalization is commendable, her focus on securing large investments like the $10 million for the James Beard Market does not directly address my immediate concerns about fiscal accountability and the financial strain on working families in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her history of supporting large state-funded projects, like a $10 million investment in the James Beard Market, means more state spending. This approach often leads to higher taxes and takes local control away from how our money is spent, which goes against the importance of fiscal responsibility and keeping resources within our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her commitment to protect 'all Oregonians from discrimination, injustice, and hate' as a Democrat in Portland raises concerns. This kind of language often means supporting social agendas that go against our Christian teachings, which weakens the moral foundation of our state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy work directly addresses critical social equity issues, such as securing housing for vulnerable communities. She secured $1.4 million in funding for cohousing in St. John's and converted a motel into 37 units of recovery housing, which directly helps our houseless neighbors and supports community well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her direct action to address the addiction and housing crises in our city, showing a real commitment to compassionate solutions. She converted a rundown motel into 37 units of recovery housing, which is exactly the kind of hands-on, progressive approach we need to support our vulnerable neighbors and make our community stronger. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her professional background as a psychotherapist and clinic executive demonstrates a clear commitment to evidence-based solutions for mental health and addiction. This practical, scientific approach to human well-being is crucial for effective governance, ensuring policies are rooted in facts rather than dogma. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she has actively worked to revitalize downtown Portland, which is so important for the heart of our city. She secured 10 million dollars to invest in the James Beard Market, bringing life and money back to the area, which helps all of us old-timers feel better about our town. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Shannon Isadore second because while she is working on important issues like downtown revitalization and addressing addiction, her approach as a sitting Democrat might not go far enough to fundamentally shift the city's direction towards truly traditional Portland values. Her efforts to fund specific projects, such as the James Beard Market, are good steps, but a broader change is needed to address the overall fiscal and public safety concerns many traditional residents have. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because their actions show a focus on corporate-driven economic development rather than truly sustainable and community-centered growth. They secured a $10 million investment for the James Beard Market and helped fund major renovations to the MODA Center. This prioritizes large commercial ventures and corporate entertainment, which clashes with the Green Party's core value of promoting local, decentralized, and environmentally conscious economic structures over corporate influence. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because while their work in addressing the addiction crisis and revitalizing downtown Portland is commendable and shows compassion, their platform does not as strongly emphasize the core values of local governance, fiscal prudence, and traditional family support that I consider paramount for societal well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while she has secured funding for various projects, her approach continues the established path that has not fixed Portland's core issues. Her focus on downtown revitalization and housing initiatives, while important, often feels like a band-aid rather than a fundamental change to the underlying problems of public safety and addiction that are still rampant. Portland needs radical action, not just more of the same. (0 votes)
#2
Ciatta Thompson

Reason I rank Ciatta Thompson as the worst candidate because her support for ending Oregon's automatic vote-by-mail system and implementing voter ID directly undermines democratic access and is a significant threat to our electoral integrity. Universal voter access is a foundational progressive value, ensuring every voice can be heard. Measures like ending vote-by-mail disproportionately affect marginalized communities and create unnecessary barriers to participation, which is completely unacceptable for a progressive voter. (10 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her clear stance on reducing taxes, which directly benefits Portland residents struggling with high costs. She has publicly opposed new taxes like House Bill 4125, which she argues would reduce the 'kicker refund' that returns excess taxpayer money, and House Bill 3991, which would increase payroll taxes, making it harder for working families and businesses. Lowering the tax burden is the most important value for me as it allows people to keep more of their hard-earned money. (8 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their clear stance on increasing police presence, which is essential for public safety in Portland. They explicitly stated they would vote yes for more police officers, aiming for 2.0 or 2.5 officers per 1000 residents, which is vital for making our city safe and supporting businesses. This directly addresses the critical need for a strong law enforcement presence to combat crime effectively. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear support for protecting children in public spaces, which directly impacts parental control over their children's safety. Thompson backs Senate Bill 1573, which stops mobile syringe programs from being too close to schools and childcare facilities. This policy shows a commitment to ensuring parents don't have to worry about their kids stepping on used needles, prioritizing the fundamental value of child safety and parental peace of mind. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy to reduce taxes directly fights inflation, which helps working families keep more of their money. She wants fiscal discipline from the government instead of new taxes that weaken people's livelihoods. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Ciatta Thompson high because her policy platform strongly supports traditional family values and fiscal responsibility. She has stated she wants to block institutional investors from buying single-family homes to ensure neighborhoods remain for families. This policy protects the sanctity of the family unit, which is the foundational building block of a moral society, and ensures that families have affordable places to live and raise children without the predatory influence of large corporations. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy to block institutional investors from buying single-family homes directly harms investment opportunities. This restricts a significant part of the market and goes against the goal of an open investment environment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their platform does not mention protecting or expanding abortion access. As a Republican who left the Democratic party over 'far-left politics,' it's highly unlikely they would support reproductive freedom, which is a critical value for voters like me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy to champion reductions in gas tax directly undermines efforts to reduce fossil fuel consumption and carbon emissions, which is a critical step in addressing climate change. Lowering gas prices encourages more driving and pollution, making our climate crisis worse. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because her platform does not address gender rights, reproductive freedom, or LGBTQ+ equality, which are the most important issues to me. Her focus on other areas, without any stated commitment to these crucial protections, indicates a lack of alignment with fundamental gender rights. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she recognizes the importance of legal immigration processes, which is crucial for upholding the rule of law and protecting our community. She has shared concerns about people who have committed crimes being released into communities, and she emphasizes that the federal government has the authority over immigration matters. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policies directly help working-class families keep more of their hard-earned money. She wants to cut the gas tax and cap TriMet pass costs, which means less money out of my pocket for getting to work every day. She also wants to block big companies from buying up houses, which will help regular folks like me afford a home. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because of her clear policy to reduce taxes and let people keep more of their own money. She states, 'You work hard for the money. You should keep more of it.' This directly supports individual liberty and free markets, which are the most important values for people to control their own wealth, rather than having it taken by the state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she wants to give power back to local communities and reduce taxes. This matters because local control means our communities can decide what's best without the state telling us what to do, which is important for our independence and pocketbooks. She believes people closest to the problem are best to solve it, and that resonates with us out here. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her approach to justice seems to ignore the deep-rooted racial disparities in our legal system. Her statement that 'equality in the courtroom is not about race. It's about finances' dismisses the systemic issues that disproportionately affect Black people, which is a major red flag for me. We need leaders who understand that racial justice is not just about money. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear focus on helping working families with their money. They want to lower gas taxes and cap TriMet costs, which puts real money back into our pockets right away. This directly helps families like ours manage the high cost of living in Portland, making sure we can save and build a better future, which is the most important thing for our community's strength. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she is a Republican who has left the far-left Democratic party, which means she understands that Portland needs common sense. While she hasn't explicitly stated her stance on gun rights, her emphasis on local control of public safety and her party affiliation suggest she will protect our Second Amendment rights, which are fundamental to personal freedom and self-defense. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy to demand accountability for the massive amounts of taxpayer money spent on homelessness, along with her plan for mandated treatment facilities, shows a genuine commitment to solving Portland's crisis with tangible results. This focus on effectiveness and transparency is a critical value, as our city is desperate for real solutions instead of endless spending that only makes things worse. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her approach to healthcare, particularly addiction, raises concerns for universal access. While she advocates for mental health and drug treatment facilities, her strong opposition to mobile syringe service programs operating near schools could limit essential harm reduction services. This stance could hinder access to a full spectrum of care for people struggling with addiction, which conflicts with my core belief in comprehensive and accessible healthcare for all. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while I appreciate the idea of stopping big corporations from buying single-family homes to help keep housing accessible for real people, their overall move away from progressive politics and focus on reducing taxes makes me question their commitment to funding the social programs Portlanders really need. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy approach emphasizes reducing taxes and scrutinizing funding for social services rather than ensuring robust, accessible support for all residents, which could negatively impact the collective well-being of vulnerable populations. For instance, she advocates for repealing the Arts tax and demands transparency and potentially suspending funding for organizations that can't show positive outcomes in homeless services. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Ciatta Thompson second because her push for a 'Local Control and Safety Act' to reduce state involvement in public safety and homelessness could fragment our city's ability to address these complex issues effectively. We need coordinated, well-funded strategies across the state, not policies that risk less support for our most vulnerable residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her commitment to reducing taxes for working families and preventing institutional investors from buying up single-family homes, which directly affects the affordability and opportunity for middle-income residents to thrive in Portland. The value of financial stability and accessible homeownership is paramount, and her policies aim to protect these for everyday people. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her strong commitment to fiscal responsibility and accountability directly challenges the wasteful spending that plagues our state. She wants to reduce taxes for working families and ensure our government is audited, which is crucial for protecting our hard-earned money from bureaucratic bloat. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Ciatta Thompson last because her focus on "election integrity" through ending vote-by-mail and requiring voter ID undermines the accessibility of our democratic process. These policies can disenfranchise young voters and marginalized communities, making it harder for our voices to be heard and weakening democratic participation in Oregon. This approach to voting is a major red flag for protecting our collective rights. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because she wants to get rid of taxes that hurt people like me. She said the Arts tax is bad for working people and the poor. Getting rid of taxes means I get to keep more of my hard-earned money, and that's the most important thing when you don't have much to begin with. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Ciatta Thompson first because of her strong commitment to restoring public safety and local control in Portland. Her plan to empower cities to tackle public safety and homelessness directly addresses the urgent need for a secure environment, which is a core value for our community in these uncertain times. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her policy to protect the 'kicker refund' and advocate for lower taxes, which directly benefits working families like mine. This means more of my hard-earned money stays in my pocket, which is crucial for financial autonomy in a city with a high cost of living. She opposed a bill that would change how the kicker refund is calculated, arguing it's a vital check on government overspending. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her stance on 'election integrity,' specifically her support for ending Oregon's successful vote-by-mail system and requiring voter ID, directly undermines democratic access. Ensuring every eligible citizen can easily vote is paramount for our democracy, and her policies would create barriers that disproportionately affect vulnerable populations. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy on empowering working families by reducing taxes and extending tax credits is very important to me. It directly addresses the burden on everyday people, ensuring that hard-working individuals can keep more of their earnings, which promotes financial stability for families in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy on local control gives power back to our city, which is essential for solving our own problems without state interference. This focus on local autonomy is vital for Portlanders to manage our community and ensures decisions are made by those closest to the issues, not some distant government body. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her strong stance on fiscal accountability and protecting the Oregon 'kicker' refund, which returns excess tax revenue to taxpayers. Her opposition to changes that could reduce these refunds demonstrates a commitment to lower taxes and responsible government spending, a key value for high-income residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her plan to keep neighborhoods for families truly matters. She wants to stop big companies from buying up homes, so regular families can afford to live and grow in our community. This protects the family unit, which is the cornerstone of our faith and society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of her policy stance on 'election integrity,' which includes supporting the #ENDVBM initiative to end Oregon's automatic vote-by-mail system and requiring voter ID. These measures would make voting harder for many residents, especially marginalized groups, undermining our commitment to accessible and inclusive democracy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of her support for ending automatic vote-by-mail and requiring voter ID, which undermines the very foundation of our accessible democracy in Oregon. Voting is a fundamental right, and anything that makes it harder for people to participate is a step backward for our community and our values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform, while addressing important issues like mental health and addiction, lacks a clear and consistent emphasis on purely evidence-based solutions, instead relying on general terms like "common sense." It is vital that governance is guided by scientific understanding and rigorous data, not vague appeals that can open the door to less rational approaches. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because she stands up for regular folks when it comes to taxes. She is against changing the state's 'kicker' refund, which gives our money back when the government collects too much, and that's just plain fair. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Ciatta Thompson first because her commitment to fiscal responsibility and local control directly addresses the core issues that have made Portland less livable. Her strong opposition to changes that would reduce the kicker refund shows she will fight to keep more money in the pockets of hardworking families, which is essential for restoring economic stability to our city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because of their strong commitment to protecting community housing from corporate greed and advocating for public control over essential services. They plan to introduce a bill blocking large investors from buying single-family homes, which is vital for maintaining affordable neighborhoods and preventing Wall Street from profiting off our housing crisis. This directly supports the Green Party value of community-based economics and grassroots democracy, ensuring that housing is for people, not profit. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong commitment to fiscal responsibility and protecting taxpayers. Her policy to reduce the gas tax and her fight to keep the kicker refund directly benefits working families by letting us keep more of our income, which is a crucial value for suburban residents facing high costs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong focus on restoring local control and promoting common-sense solutions, which I believe are essential for maintaining stable and virtuous communities. Their commitment to fiscal responsibility and empowering working families by reducing taxes directly supports the value of righteous living through honest labor and responsible resource management. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because her plan to end automatic vote-by-mail and require voter ID goes against making it easier for everyone to vote. Protecting voting access for all citizens is a core value, and policies that make it harder, no matter the reason, are a concern for our community. She supports the #ENDVBM initiative which aims to stop Oregon's current vote-by-mail system. (0 votes)

State House District 34

#1
Mari Watanabe

Reason I rank this candidate low because she voted 'yes' on House Bill 4145, which strengthens Measure 114, a law that severely restricts gun ownership in Oregon. This bill makes it harder for law-abiding citizens to exercise their Second Amendment right to bear arms by increasing permit fees and extending waiting periods for gun purchases. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her clear policy of cutting red tape for highly skilled immigrants and refugees with advanced degrees. This directly helps new Oregonians contribute to our economy and strengthens our community, which is the most important value. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because she supports measures like Senate Bill 1507. This bill removes tax cuts for businesses and ends deductions for auto loan interest, which will increase the tax burden on Oregonians and is a move away from the important value of lower taxes. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because her history shows a clear commitment to protecting all communities from discrimination, including based on religion, which is vital for our safety and freedom. Her efforts to advocate for immigrants and fight hate crimes directly safeguard our community's ability to practice our faith without fear. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she actively fights against discrimination and pushes for policies that directly help immigrants and people of color. Her work to cut through bureaucracy for skilled immigrants means our families can get good jobs and build a strong future here, which is the most important thing for our community's survival and growth. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her legislative history includes requiring owners to be financially responsible for bulk fuel cleanups, which directly protects our environment from pollution. This action is a crucial step in safeguarding our natural world and mitigating the impacts of climate change, demonstrating a commitment to environmental accountability that benefits all Oregonians. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because she is a Democrat in Oregon, a state that has codified abortion rights into law. As an incumbent, she supports maintaining and expanding access to essential reproductive healthcare, which is the most important value for me. The Oregon Reproductive Health Equity Act, passed by Democrats, ensures most insurance plans cover abortion at no cost, and her party actively defends these protections. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her plan for "enhancing public safety" is too broad. She talks about cyber safety and hate crimes, but Portland needs someone focused on stopping the everyday street crime and property damage that makes us feel unsafe right now. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her alignment with the Democratic party, and endorsements from senators who actively defend the state's mandate for abortion coverage, goes against the sanctity of life. This policy directly contradicts our most fundamental moral principles. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her history shows she actively worked on policies to improve access to affordable housing, like advocating for SB 1533A. This directly helps with the high cost of living that is squeezing families in Portland, making financial stability a top value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy supports ethnic studies in classrooms. While promoting cultural reflection, this approach often introduces curriculum elements that can be seen as political agendas, which may interfere with parental authority over what their children are taught in schools. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Mari Watanabe first because she explicitly commits to protecting civil, gender, and reproductive rights, which is the most critical value for all people in Oregon. Her record shows a clear dedication to fighting discrimination based on gender and sexual orientation, ensuring that everyone can live freely and equally. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while her work in diversity and economic development is noted, it doesn't seem to directly tackle the urgent issues of public safety and government spending that are impacting the quality of life for office workers in Portland. We need immediate, tangible action on these critical problems. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because, while she supports economic development and cuts red tape for skilled workers, her votes have included approving new or increased fees and an additional assessment rate for the Workers' Benefit Fund. These actions can raise costs for businesses, which is not ideal for stock market performance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Mari Watanabe highest because she actively supports policies that aim to provide universal healthcare access for all Oregonians. She supported establishing a Universal Health Care Commission, which is a crucial step toward ensuring everyone in our state can get the care they need, regardless of their background or situation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while she speaks of protecting all communities and religions, her broad focus on 'diversity, equity, and inclusion' might promote ideas that do not align with our traditional religious values. It is crucial to uphold specific religious freedoms and traditional family structures without dilution from other agendas. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her history shows a deep understanding of systemic oppression and a commitment to fighting for civil rights, which is the most important value for my community's survival. Her work to secure long-term funding to combat wage theft and civil rights violations directly helps black workers who often face exploitation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Mari Watanabe as the best choice because her legislative record shows a strong commitment to protecting older adults, which is incredibly important for ensuring dignity and stability for people like me. She has actively worked to increase protections for older adults in long-term care facilities, showing she truly cares about our well-being. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Mari Watanabe low because her strong advocacy for LGBTQ+ rights and broad definitions of diversity, equity, and inclusion go against the foundational biblical principles of family and morality that I uphold. While valuing all people, I cannot support policies that redefine God's created order, which is a critical aspect of our faith and societal well-being. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her platform explicitly champions protecting all communities from discrimination, including based on religion and sexual orientation. This commitment to secular equality is a critical value for ensuring that government decisions are based on universal human rights rather than religious dogma, which is important to me as a resident of Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her strong emphasis on diversity, equity, and inclusion, as well as cutting red tape for immigrants and refugees, goes against my core belief in prioritizing the needs and established values of our current citizenry. While some may see this as progress, these policies can divert resources and attention from the challenges faced by long-term residents and our traditional societal structures. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of her vote to expand urban growth boundaries for affordable housing, which I believe threatens the character of our suburban neighborhoods. Adding more high-density housing options, like manufactured dwelling parks or housing for older persons, could lead to increased traffic and strain on our local resources, directly impacting the quiet, family-oriented atmosphere and potentially lowering our property values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Mari Watanabe as the better choice because she has shown a commitment to environmental protection, even if it's a small step. She championed a policy requiring owners to be financially responsible for bulk fuel cleanups, which helps protect our natural environment from pollution. This action aligns with the Green Party's core value of ecological wisdom and ensuring a sustainable future by holding polluters accountable for their impact on our shared resources. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Mari Watanabe as the best candidate because her policy priorities strongly emphasize protecting civil rights and ensuring equal protections for all Oregonians, which is a core humanist value of advocating for human dignity and equality. Her work and lived experience, including her parents' internment, demonstrate a deep understanding of the importance of fighting discrimination against all communities, regardless of race, gender, creed, ability, religion, or sexual orientation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Mari Watanabe as the best candidate because she actively champions policies that protect and uplift diverse communities, which is crucial for fostering a truly inclusive Oregon. Her commitment to cutting red tape for skilled immigrants and supporting diversity in the workplace creates vital opportunities for people to thrive, reflecting the importance of economic and social integration for all residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Mari Watanabe high because her strong advocacy for diversity, equity, and inclusion is exactly what Portland needs. Her personal history, with her parents enduring forced internment during WWII, shows she genuinely understands why protecting all communities from discrimination is so important for our society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because her policy history shows a tendency towards expanding government oversight and regulation. For example, she supported long-term funding for BOLI to investigate wage theft and civil rights issues, which means more government meddling in private contracts and businesses, eroding individual freedom. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Mari Watanabe high because her history of championing diversity, equity, and inclusion directly aligns with Portland's core values. This focus is crucial for fostering a welcoming and thriving community for everyone, especially as we see continuous growth and change in our city. She has actively worked to expand opportunities for immigrants and communities of color, which is vital for our collective strength. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Mari Watanabe as the best candidate because her legislative history clearly shows a deep commitment to protecting vulnerable communities and advancing equity. Her efforts to secure long-term funding for BOLI to investigate wage theft and civil rights violations directly support working families and ensure fair treatment for everyone, which is a crucial value for creating a truly just society in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because, while her voting record is not perfect, she serves on the House Committee on Economic Development, Small Business, and Trade, and has stated goals of lowering the cost of living for Oregonians. My most important value is fighting inflation, and her involvement in economic development committees shows a potential to address underlying economic issues that impact prices, even if her specific actions are sometimes mixed. She is focused on policies that can help grow private sector jobs and ensure Oregon's economy serves its people. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong commitment to environmental protection, specifically requiring owners to be financially responsible for bulk fuel clean-ups. This policy directly addresses corporate accountability for pollution, which is crucial for the health of our city and aligns with my deep concern for a sustainable future for all Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Mari Watanabe first because she has actively worked to make housing more affordable. She advocated for a law, SB 1533A, to help people get safe and stable homes. This is important to me because affordable housing means I can keep a roof over my head and have a chance at a better life, which is the most important thing for survival. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her actions like cutting red tape for highly skilled immigrants and refugees seem to put outside interests before the needs of people who have lived here for generations. Prioritizing our existing local workforce and community's well-being is the most important value for our area. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her clear commitment to protecting all communities from discrimination, especially based on religion, is crucial for the safety and security of our Jewish community. She understands the importance of fighting against hatred and ensuring a safe place for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Mari Watanabe first because her unwavering commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion is crucial for Portland's future. Her work to cut bureaucratic barriers for skilled immigrants and refugees ensures that our community welcomes and integrates all residents, which is essential for a just and thriving society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Mari Watanabe first because of her proven commitment to building economic stability and community strength through diversity and inclusion. Her leadership at organizations like Partners in Diversity, which expanded significantly under her direction, directly creates pathways for success that are vital for our families and local businesses. This focus on equitable opportunity and community resilience is a core value, ensuring everyone can thrive in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her primary focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion, while well-intentioned, does not seem to directly address the urgent need for practical solutions to our city's current issues like public safety and cost of living. We need leadership that prioritizes immediate, tangible improvements in our daily lives over what some might see as more abstract social initiatives. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy to cut red tape for highly skilled immigrants and refugees will expand our local talent pool. This directly benefits businesses by providing access to a larger and more diverse workforce, which is essential for continued economic growth and maintaining Portland's competitive edge. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her legislative actions have directly strengthened support for older adults in long-term care facilities, which is crucial for the dignity and well-being of our senior community, showing she acts on important local values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her history shows she fights for fair pay for workers. She pushed for funding for the Bureau of Labor and Industries to stop wage theft, which protects working folks like me from getting ripped off by bosses. This is super important because without fair wages, we can't afford to live or support our families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Mari Watanabe low because her consistent focus on expanding workforce pathways for immigrants, while a specific policy, could lead to less direct attention on ensuring robust job security and opportunities for the residents who have built their lives here, which is fundamental to our city's traditional economic stability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform heavily emphasizes diversity, equity, and inclusion, which I believe distracts from the urgent need to address fundamental issues like rising crime and the homeless crisis in Portland. We need practical solutions that benefit all residents, not just those focused on specific identity groups. (0 votes)
#2
Shaunie Cousins

Reason I rank this candidate highest because she clearly states that Oregon families need tax relief. She wants the government to look at existing resources before asking taxpayers for more money, which directly aligns with my value of lower taxes and less financial burden on Portland residents. (4 votes)

Reason I rank Shaunie Cousins high because her platform emphasizes family-first leadership and strong schools where parents have a clear role. This commitment to upholding traditional family values and parental authority in education is paramount for ensuring our children are raised with moral guidance and a solid foundation, which is a core tenet of our faith. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because there is no clear public record of her supporting strict gun control laws. Protecting our Second Amendment rights is the most important issue, and a candidate who has not actively worked against gun owners is preferable. (2 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her policy platform emphasizes taking a harder look at taxes, fees, and regulatory burdens to provide relief. Reducing these financial pressures directly boosts company profits and investor confidence, which is vital for a strong stock market. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because while her platform talks about affordability, public safety, and strong schools, it doesn't give specific plans or a clear history on how she will actually fix the super high cost of living and housing crisis here in Portland. I need to see more concrete actions for my family's finances. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her Republican affiliation and general platform of 'affordability, public safety, strong schools, and accountable government' lack specific, bold policies that address the urgent needs of social justice, climate action, and systemic equity that are paramount to progressive values. Without a clear commitment to dismantling oppressive structures and promoting radical inclusivity, her approach falls short of the transformative change our community demands. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while she speaks of public safety and strong communities, her platform lacks a clear and explicit commitment to protecting religious minorities and supporting immigrant families. This absence leaves our community vulnerable and shows a lack of understanding of the specific protections we need to thrive. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform focuses on general 'public safety' and 'accountability' without clear support for immigrant protections. In Oregon, a focus on strict law enforcement without acknowledging immigrant rights can harm our diverse communities, which goes against the most important value of supporting all residents. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform talks about general issues like affordability and public safety, but it doesn't give specific plans to fight for the unique challenges faced by our immigrant families in Portland. We need someone who will stand up against injustice and make sure our voices are heard, and I don't see that clear commitment from her. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Shaunie Cousins low because her platform's emphasis on "common-sense" and "family-first" approaches, alongside a focus on "public order," often signals policies that do not fully embrace the comprehensive social justice and environmental protections crucial for a progressive city like Portland. While affordability is a concern, her general approach lacks the detailed, equity-driven solutions our urban residents need. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Shaunie Cousins last because her campaign platform completely lacks any mention of environmental protection or climate action. Her focus on 'affordability, public safety, and strong schools' ignores the urgent need for ecological wisdom and sustainability that is crucial for our planet and future generations. The absence of these critical issues shows a disconnect from the most important challenges facing Oregonians, which is a major concern for Green Party values. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy prioritizes parents as essential partners in their children's education. This directly supports the importance of parental control, ensuring that schools focus on core academics and respect parental input, rather than pushing other agendas. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her strong focus on public safety and accountable government is exactly what Portland needs right now. It's vital for our city's livability that leaders prioritize making our neighborhoods safer and ensure taxpayer money is spent wisely to improve our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her focus on "public safety" and "enforcing laws" without a clear, specific commitment to police reform or addressing racial bias in the justice system raises major concerns. True safety for our community means dismantling oppressive systems, not just enforcing existing ones that often harm us. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her clear focus on public safety, which is paramount for our suburban community. The escalating issues of crime and disorder in the greater Portland area directly impact our sense of security and property values, making her commitment to 'safe communities' and 'public order' a vital priority for our district. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Shaunie Cousins lower because while she has a background in health policy, her stated platform focuses on general affordability and public safety rather than specific, clear initiatives to expand healthcare access or reduce costs for all Oregonians. Her campaign materials do not clearly outline how she would improve healthcare for people in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Shaunie Cousins last because her campaign focuses on general issues like affordability and public safety, without any specific mention of gender rights, reproductive rights, or LGBTQ+ protections. As a single-issue voter, I need a candidate who clearly champions these fundamental rights to ensure that our community is truly inclusive and equitable for everyone. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because, as a Republican, her platform does not mention protecting abortion access. While she focuses on 'family-first leadership' and 'safe communities,' these terms often signal a stance that is not supportive of reproductive freedom, which is my paramount concern. Without a clear commitment to upholding abortion rights, she does not align with my most important value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform emphasizes "common-sense, family-first leadership" and a focus on traditional academic performance over what she calls "political agendas" in schools. This approach seems to overlook the critical need for inclusive education and progressive social policies that directly address systemic inequalities, which are essential for creating a truly equitable and just Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform focuses broadly on 'common-sense, family-first leadership' and 'public safety' without specific policy details that directly address the separation of church and state or robust protections for LGBTQ+ rights. As an extreme atheist, I need a candidate who clearly prioritizes secular governance and universal human rights over potentially religiously-influenced 'family-first' rhetoric, which her platform does not explicitly provide. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Shaunie Cousins lower because her focus on "public safety" and "accountable government", while important, does not explicitly highlight the same strong commitment to comprehensive social justice and equity for all marginalized groups that I prioritize as a humanist. While she mentions protecting civil liberties, her overall platform appears to prioritize a more traditional approach to governance rather than actively championing the expansive human rights agenda that I believe is essential for a truly equitable society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Shaunie Cousins lower because while her focus on general affordability and public safety is important, her platform does not clearly address the specific needs of diverse communities or emphasize policies that promote inclusion and combat discrimination. For a truly representative government, it is vital to have leaders who actively champion the rights and opportunities for all, especially those from varied backgrounds. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Shaunie Cousins low because her focus on 'common-sense' and 'public safety, public order' seems too traditional for Portland. We need bold, progressive changes to fix our city's problems, and her platform doesn't sound like it will tackle the root issues in a meaningful way. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because her platform emphasizes fiscal responsibility and keeping government from squeezing families. Her focus on accountability and affordability suggests she wants less government intrusion and lower taxes, which is crucial for individual economic liberty. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Shaunie Cousins low because while she talks about 'common-sense, family-first leadership' and 'practical policymaking,' her platform lacks specific plans for Portland's unique issues. For a city facing major challenges like homelessness and rising costs, we need detailed, actionable policies, not just general ideas about affordability and public safety. Her approach seems too vague to truly help our community right now. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her clear focus on "public safety" and "public order" shows she understands what Portland needs. We must have leaders who will hold criminals accountable, and her stance promises to make our streets safer for families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Shaunie Cousins as the worst candidate because her platform, while mentioning general ideas like "accountability" and "strong schools," offers no specific plans for tackling the systemic inequities and environmental crises that are urgent to Portland residents. Her emphasis on "practical policymaking" without a clear commitment to progressive values feels like a way to avoid addressing the real issues and could lead to a rollback of crucial protections for our diverse communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because there is no public information available regarding her stance on economic policy, inflation, or fiscal responsibility. As an extreme single-issue inflation voter, I cannot support a candidate when I have no evidence of their commitment to controlling rising costs, which are a major concern for Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her commitment to 'family-first leadership' directly supports the sanctity of the family, which is a core value. This focus ensures that policies consider the well-being and traditional structure of families, which is vital for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her focus on public safety and enforcing laws directly aligns with the fundamental value of a safe and orderly community. It is crucial for citizens to feel secure in their neighborhoods, and her platform prioritizes this need by advocating for accountability and public order. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Shaunie Cousins second because her platform talks about making things affordable for families, which is good. She mentions common-sense leadership and focusing on affordability. While she doesn't give specific examples of laws she's pushed for like the other candidate, the idea of making life more affordable is still important for people like me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she believes in building real change from the ground up, which means listening to us folks out here. This focus on local input and practical policymaking is important to ensure that decisions made in Salem truly help our communities, not just the city folks. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while her focus on public safety is good, she does not explicitly mention protecting religious minorities from discrimination. For our community, explicit support against antisemitism and for the safety of diverse religious groups is a top priority, and her platform lacks this specific assurance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Shaunie Cousins last because her Republican platform emphasizes 'practical policymaking' and 'accountability' without the clear progressive vision needed for our state. For an extreme Democrat in Portland, this indicates a lack of focus on critical issues like climate justice, systemic equity, and robust social safety nets, which are paramount to our values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Shaunie Cousins second because her platform emphasizes essential values of public safety and strong schools, which are crucial for our community's well-being. She advocates for 'public safety, public order, and compassionate but workable solutions,' showing a practical approach to keeping our neighborhoods secure. This focus on foundational order and safe environments directly impacts the ability of families to live and prosper without fear, which is very important. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform, while addressing important issues like public safety and affordability, lacks specific, actionable plans that would directly benefit the economic environment for high-income residents. While I appreciate the focus on practical policymaking, I need more concrete proposals that support wealth creation and preservation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Shaunie Cousins last because her focus on "practical policymaking" and "accountable government" doesn't provide enough detail on how she plans to address the deep systemic issues affecting our most vulnerable communities here in Portland. Her platform lacks specific plans for expanding critical social services that our city desperately needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while her platform touches on important general concerns like affordability and public safety, her specific legislative policy proposals are not clearly detailed, making it harder to gauge her practical impact on our community compared to an incumbent with a legislative record. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her plans for fixing things like housing are too vague. She talks about affordability, which is good, but doesn't have clear actions like protecting workers from wage theft. We need solid plans and a track record of action, not just talk, to make life better for working families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Shaunie Cousins high because her clear focus on restoring public safety and promoting common-sense leadership directly addresses the breakdown of order we've seen in our city, which is essential for protecting our families and bringing back the stable community life we value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her focus on 'family-first leadership' and supporting parents in schools aligns with our traditional values. It is important that our children are raised with strong family guidance and respect for timeless principles, ensuring the stability and moral fabric of our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her focus on public safety and accountability directly addresses the core problems plaguing our city. Portland needs leaders who will enforce laws and restore order, which is essential for our community's well-being and for ensuring that public spaces are respected. (0 votes)

State House District 35

#1
Farrah Chaichi

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her legislative record clearly shows she fights for human rights, like securing funding for affordable housing and protecting reproductive and gender-affirming healthcare. This directly helps our community and reflects our shared value that everyone deserves a safe and healthy life, not just the wealthy. She also openly supports taxing big corporations and the rich to fund universal programs. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate as the best because she actively champions gender rights, demonstrated by her sponsorship of legislation that maintains funding for reproductive and gender-affirming healthcare in Oregon. This policy directly protects crucial services for voters and upholds the vital importance of bodily autonomy and equal access to healthcare. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because she has actually fought for affordable housing and protections for working people. She helped fund an affordable housing project in Beaverton, and that helps regular folks like me find a place to live. That's real action for our community, and it shows she cares about our livelihoods, which is the most important thing for us manual workers. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their clear and unwavering support for abortion access, which is the most important value to me. As an Oregon State Representative, Farrah Chaichi voted to pass HB2002, a bill that states every individual has a fundamental right to 'pregnancy termination services.' This action directly protects and expands access to vital reproductive healthcare for all Oregonians. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Farrah Chaichi lowest because her affiliation with the Democratic Socialists of America and her push to "Tax the Rich" directly undermine the principles of free-market capitalism and individual economic liberty. Her vote against criminalizing fentanyl possession also shows a dangerous disregard for public safety and personal accountability, which are critical values for a secure community in Portland. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because while she focuses on some important issues like housing, her public call to 'Tax the Rich' and demand that multinational corporations and the top 1% pay their 'fair share' is a direct threat to my financial stability and the broader business environment. These policies could lead to higher taxes and increased regulatory burdens that negatively impact wealth creation in the state. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she actively champions aligning state investments with environmental values. She supports legislation like SB 541, which mandates that Oregon's investment portfolio considers human rights and the 'habitability of our planet,' instead of just prioritizing profits. This policy directly addresses the root causes of our climate crisis by redirecting state funds away from harmful practices, which is crucial for our future. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her explicit policy to "Tax the Rich" and "large multinational corporations" would likely reduce corporate profits and potentially decrease capital available for investment, which can hurt the stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she voted against House Bill 4145, a bill that would have made gun permits more expensive and created a gun registry. This action directly protects our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, which is the most important value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Farrah Chaichi highest because she consistently fights for immigrant rights and ensures our communities have basic needs. Her work on "Food for All Oregonians" directly helps families who have been left out, showing she values every person's dignity and our collective well-being. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Farrah Chaichi first because she actively fights for our most vulnerable, proven by her brave stand as the only legislator to vote against recriminalizing fentanyl, which shows a true commitment to reducing harm and keeping people out of jail, a compassionate value essential for Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her focus on affordable housing and consumer protections directly addresses key drivers of living costs, which helps reduce inflation's impact on residents. However, her support for 'tax the rich' to fund 'universal programs' could lead to more government spending, which can be inflationary. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because she advocates for increasing revenue by making "large multinational corporations and the top 1% of wealthy individuals pay their fair share." While this targets specific groups, it still represents an increase in taxes, which is against my core value of reducing the tax burden on all. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she has a track record of working on real problems like making housing affordable in Beaverton, and she gets things done for our community. It's important to me that we have someone who understands the needs of long-time residents and delivers tangible results, ensuring stability for families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, while she has experience as an incumbent and focuses on local housing, her vote against criminalizing fentanyl is a huge concern for public safety in our suburbs. Keeping our communities safe from dangerous drugs is a top priority, and that vote makes me question her commitment to law and order. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their strong focus on making housing more affordable, which is a huge concern for me in Portland. They have a clear policy to give local leaders more power to address the housing crisis and supported funding for new affordable housing units, which shows real action toward lowering housing costs for families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their strong and public stance against the ongoing oppression in Palestine. They called for an immediate ceasefire and condemned the 'ethnic cleansing' and 'war crimes' against Palestinians, directly challenging harmful U.S. foreign policy which is a critical issue of justice and a fundamental concern for our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she has actively fought for human rights within the system, like her work to require police to unmask and to fund affordable housing. While she works within current structures, her legislative wins directly improve the material conditions for working-class people and marginalized communities, which is a vital step toward justice. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her legislative history shows a focus on state-directed education initiatives that can undermine parental control, which is the most important value. For example, she co-sponsored a bill for a statewide education plan for immigrant students, which prioritizes state involvement in curriculum over parental autonomy in education decisions. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of her active support for policies like the 'Law Enforcement Accountability and Visibility Act', which aims to expand Oregon's sanctuary laws and prohibit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. This directly opposes the essential value of a secure and lawful community by making it harder to enforce immigration laws and protect our state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her public statements regarding the Israel-Hamas war and her alignment with anti-Zionist groups raise serious concerns about her understanding and support for the Jewish community's security and identity. It undermines the critical value of communal safety and solidarity, which is paramount for our people, when a representative dismisses our existential concerns. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because her policies, such as advocating to 'tax the rich' to fund 'universal programs,' represent a significant expansion of government control over individual wealth and the economy. While she does mention protecting Oregonians from federal overreach, her overall legislative agenda at the state level involves extensive government spending and regulation, which diminishes individual economic freedom and free markets. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because of her strong legislative history supporting affordable housing and protecting civil liberties. She secured funding for affordable housing, like Beaverton's Meadowlark Place, which is crucial for our community. She also fought for legislation requiring law enforcement to be identifiable, which shows a commitment to accountability and protecting people from government overreach, a value I find extremely important in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her consistent record shows she fights for human rights and secular policies, which is essential for a progressive society. She has actively sponsored legislation to maintain funding for reproductive and gender-affirming healthcare, directly protecting bodily autonomy and opposing religious interference in medical decisions. This commitment ensures that public services remain accessible and free from faith-based discrimination, a core value for those who prioritize evidence-based governance and individual liberty. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her consistent legislative history, including securing funding for affordable housing and spearheading legislation to protect Oregonians from federal overreach regarding information sharing, demonstrates a commitment to foundational human rights and community safety. Her work on immigration-related practices is especially important for ensuring that diverse communities are secure and treated with dignity, which is a vital aspect of a compassionate state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her legislative record demonstrates a consistent commitment to advancing human rights, particularly through her work on affordable housing and support for comprehensive healthcare, including reproductive and gender-affirming services. This unwavering dedication ensures that the most vulnerable in our community have their basic needs met and their dignity protected, which are paramount humanist values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Farrah Chaichi first because she actively fights for human rights, proving it by securing funding for affordable housing and sponsoring legislation for reproductive and gender-affirming healthcare. This shows she values basic human dignity above corporate profits, which is crucial for all Oregonians to thrive in a just society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her clear history of fighting for economic security for working people, which is vital when many service jobs offer unstable wages. She voted against a bill that could have weakened worker protections, showing she stands firm on keeping benefits like Paid Leave Oregon, which helps workers when they need time off. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her legislative record strongly supports reproductive and gender-affirming healthcare, which is absolutely vital for bodily autonomy and human dignity in our community. She consistently fights for these basic human rights, ensuring that all Oregonians can access essential care without judgment. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her consistent fight for human rights and against corporate greed is exactly what Portland needs to address massive inequality. Her active support for policies like "Food for All Oregonians," which helps everyone access basic necessities regardless of immigration status, shows a deep commitment to true social justice for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she actively works to make housing a human right and pushes for real solutions like rent control. This directly helps me and my neighbors keep a roof over our heads when rents keep going up and up. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her actions show a disregard for rural economic concerns and property rights. She voted against studying natural resource development in Curry County, which hurts our ability to create jobs and manage our land. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their strong policy stating that healthcare is a human right and their efforts to improve access to culturally responsive and affordable care. They have sponsored legislation to protect reproductive and gender-affirming healthcare and to prevent corporate control over clinics, which helps ensure more people can get the care they need without profit getting in the way. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear policy to expand food assistance to all families, including immigrants, which directly supports the well-being and stability of our community. This policy is crucial for ensuring social equity and protecting vulnerable populations in Portland, reflecting my extreme belief that everyone deserves basic necessities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while she supports policies that are problematic, she is an incumbent who has engaged with issues like housing affordability. Her efforts to secure funding for projects such as Beaverton's Meadowlark Place indicate an attempt to address a local issue, even if her approach to housing and homelessness raises concerns about public order. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her actions show a clear commitment to fighting for economic justice, which is essential for working-class people in Oregon. She has actively pushed to tax the rich, making sure large corporations and the wealthiest individuals pay their fair share so that we can fund vital public services and programs for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policies, such as being against criminalizing fentanyl and supporting gender-affirming healthcare, go against my core beliefs rooted in biblical principles. These stances promote actions that I believe harm individuals and society, moving us away from God's design for human health and morality. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Farrah Chaichi highest because she actively champions human rights through progressive legislation, like securing funding for affordable housing and protecting reproductive healthcare. This demonstrates a commitment to ensuring basic needs are met for all, which is a core value for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because while she has worked on important consumer protections like preventing utility rate increases, her affiliation with the Democratic Socialists of America suggests a more extreme progressive ideology. A traditional resident of Portland values a balanced approach to governance and fiscal responsibility, and some of her policy stances could be seen as disruptive to the economic stability and common-sense solutions our community relies on. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear policy to tax large multinational corporations and the wealthiest 1% to fund universal programs and protect critical services. This directly addresses economic inequality and ensures resources for our community, which is a fundamental value for a just and sustainable society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her policies on social issues go against traditional values. She supports gender-affirming healthcare and opposes criminalizing fentanyl, which I believe undermines the moral fabric of society. This contradicts the importance of upholding family values and societal order. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her strong legislative history in promoting human rights and government accountability. Her spearheading of legislation requiring law enforcement to unmask and identify themselves directly impacts civil liberties, which is incredibly important for ensuring transparency and protecting residents from potential government overreach in our community. (0 votes)
#2
Johan Arteaga Cruz

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because his platform is very progressive, including calls for single-payer healthcare and increased corporate taxes to address housing costs and aid the homeless. These are crucial steps toward a more equitable society. While his vision is strong and aligns with my values, his lack of prior governmental experience makes me slightly hesitant compared to an incumbent with a proven track record. (10 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his platform is explicitly about "Progressivism" and "Anti-neoliberalism," demanding fundamental systemic change like single-payer healthcare and big corporate tax increases. This bold vision for a "People First" government speaks to the urgent need to dismantle economic injustices that disproportionately hurt young people and the working class in Portland, making him the strongest voice for radical transformation. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because he talks about making sure the working class can prosper and wants to raise taxes on big corporations to help with housing costs. These are good ideas that would help people like me. But he doesn't have much experience in government or a clear record of getting things done, so it's harder to trust he can deliver on these promises. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his platform explicitly includes a "corporate tax increase." This is a direct call for higher taxes on businesses, which would hurt the economy and ultimately impact all Oregonians through higher costs or fewer jobs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his listed priorities focus on progressive social issues and do not include protecting Second Amendment rights. This suggests he would likely support further gun control measures, which would undermine our fundamental right to self-defense. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his focus on social services, like expanding mental health and addiction programs, while important, does not directly address the urgent need for more policing and stricter enforcement to deter criminals. We need immediate action to stop crime now. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform, while aiming to reduce housing costs, includes many proposals for new and expanded social programs funded by corporate tax increases. This level of government expansion and spending could fuel inflation by putting more money into the economy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform clearly advocates for a "corporate tax increase" and anti-neoliberal policies. These actions would directly reduce corporate earnings and create an uncertain business environment, negatively impacting stock market performance and investor confidence. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, while his broader progressive platform does not fully align with my values, his focus on family and child services, and aiding our homeless population, shows a concern for the vulnerable in our community. Caring for those in need is a Christian principle, even if our methods to achieve that differ. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because of their commitment to social justice and supporting the most vulnerable in our community. Their platform emphasizes increasing corporate taxes, reducing housing costs, and providing aid to the homeless, which reflects the Islamic value of caring for those in need and ensuring economic equity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, while they advocate for broad social justice and civil rights, they do not explicitly mention abortion or reproductive rights in their stated priorities. This lack of specific commitment means voters cannot be certain about their dedication to protecting abortion access, which is my paramount concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform calls for a 'New Vision for Oregon' and explicitly pushes for 'Anti-neoliberalism, Progressivism, and Left-wing Nationalism'. This speaks to a radical restructuring of power to put 'The People First' and dismantle systems that have oppressed our communities, which is essential for true liberation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because, while his economic ideas may be too progressive, he talks about a 'people first' vision that includes community support and family services. He states his commitment to principles of a just common life and understanding the struggles of today, which resonates with the importance of community welfare. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their clear policy to fight for single-payer healthcare, which is the most important value for ensuring everyone in Oregon has access to comprehensive and affordable medical care. Single-payer healthcare would remove financial barriers, making health a human right for all people, not just a privilege for the wealthy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because his platform emphasizes broad social justice and civil rights, which could include gender rights, but lacks specific policies on reproductive freedom or gender-affirming care. While his general stance on social equality is positive, it doesn't offer the explicit commitment to gender rights that I prioritize for voters. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform advocates for 'Left-wing Nationalism' and 'Anti-neoliberalism,' which are alarming ideologies that threaten the free market and individual liberties essential for economic prosperity in our community. These extreme views could lead to policies that undermine the economic stability and personal freedoms important to residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while their platform emphasizes social justice and equality, which can sometimes lead to less strict immigration policies, they have not specifically pushed for policies that directly undermine immigration enforcement. The importance of keeping our community safe and orderly means avoiding policies that would encourage illegal immigration. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his platform explicitly advocates for a 'corporate tax increase' and 'single-payer healthcare,' which would undoubtedly result in higher taxes on businesses and high-income individuals. These policies would severely impact the economic prosperity of Portland's wealthiest residents and could deter business investment, undermining the city's financial health. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because while his platform emphasizes social programs for housing and healthcare, which aligns with Catholic social teaching to care for the vulnerable, he does not explicitly prioritize the protection of unborn life or religious freedom, which are fundamental to our faith. His general progressive stance suggests a likely divergence on these critical moral issues. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because his platform includes vital progressive policies that would greatly benefit working families in Portland. He advocates for single-payer healthcare and increasing corporate taxes, which are essential steps to creating a more equitable society. While he may not have a legislative record yet, his clear commitment to these fundamental changes aligns with my desire for real progress. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because their platform includes 'investment in education' and their occupation is in 'Family and Child Services', but they lack specific policies on parental control. While their general progressive stance suggests a focus on social programs, they haven't taken clear positions that directly support or oppose parental authority, making them a less defined choice for the most important issue. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform for social and economic justice directly supports the Jewish value of tikkun olam, repairing the world, by advocating for the most vulnerable in our community. His commitment to universal healthcare, affordable housing, and aid for the homeless ensures that all Oregonians, including members of our community, have their basic needs met, which is fundamental to a just society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his platform strongly advocates for social and environmental justice, reflecting a commitment to human well-being through rational policy. His support for single-payer healthcare, affordable housing, and expanded mental health services demonstrates a focus on practical solutions to societal problems rather than relying on faith-based initiatives. This vision aligns with the importance of a secular government that prioritizes the material needs and equality of all people. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his explicit platform of "Anti-neoliberalism, Progressivism, and Left-wing Nationalism" clearly prioritizes the well-being of our local communities and working class over corporate interests. This strong stance on government providing social programs, strategic infrastructure, and social equality is essential for building a truly equitable society where everyone has a chance to thrive. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their commitment to a new progressive vision, which includes fighting for single-payer healthcare and increasing corporate taxes. I really value bold action to make the system fair, and these policies would help fund essential services for everyone in Oregon, not just the wealthy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform explicitly advocates for fundamental humanist principles such as universal single-payer healthcare, increased corporate taxes to fund social programs, and significant investment in education and environmental justice. His vision prioritizes collective well-being and social equality, which are essential for creating a just and compassionate society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Johan Arteaga Cruz second because he advocates for a truly progressive vision, including single-payer healthcare and increased corporate taxes. This focus on economic justice ensures working families can get the care they need and that the wealthy pay their fair share, creating a more equitable community for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he pushes for big changes that would help working people and address the root causes of poverty. He wants to raise corporate taxes and make healthcare a right for everyone, which would make a huge difference for service workers struggling to get by. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his commitment to single-payer healthcare and significantly increasing corporate taxes aligns with the critical need for economic and health equity in Oregon. This policy ensures that wealth is redistributed to benefit all people, especially the working class, upholding the value of collective well-being over corporate greed. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because they advocate for policies that matter to me, like increasing corporate taxes and bringing down housing costs, which could help ease the financial burden on families. However, they don't have prior government experience, which makes me wonder if they can get these important things done. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Johan Arteaga Cruz in the middle because, while he advocates for expanding government programs and corporate tax increases, which are against fiscal conservatism, his stated focus on aiding the homeless and investing in education, though misguided in approach, at least acknowledges societal problems. This reflects a desire to address issues, even if his proposed "single-payer healthcare" and "Left-wing Nationalism" are contrary to my belief in individual responsibility and free markets. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he promises to put people first and wants to raise corporate taxes to help pay for things like healthcare and lower housing costs. This focus on getting money from big companies to help everyday people is a good idea. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his platform pushes for big government ideas like corporate tax increases and single-payer healthcare, which would mean more taxes and less freedom for working folks and businesses. We need less government, not more. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because while his progressive vision for single-payer healthcare and corporate tax increases aligns with many of my values for a more equitable society, his lack of prior governmental experience and advocacy for a 'no reelection' model raise concerns about the stability and effectiveness of his approach to governance. It is important to have strong, experienced leadership to achieve truly progressive outcomes. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because his platform strongly advocates for single-payer healthcare, which is a crucial step toward ensuring that all Oregonians have access to medical care, regardless of their income. This policy truly puts people before profit, aligning with the core progressive value of universal access to essential services. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Johan Arteaga Cruz in the middle because his platform strongly advocates for single-payer healthcare and increased corporate taxes, showing a clear vision for economic justice. While he lacks prior government experience, his progressive goals are crucial for a more equitable Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Johan Arteaga Cruz in the middle because his platform for single-payer healthcare and increasing corporate taxes directly addresses the extreme wealth inequality that plagues our state, showing a strong vision for economic justice that Portland desperately needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because he talks a lot about helping people with housing and healthcare, which is important, but he doesn't have any experience in government. I value someone who has a clear plan and the know-how to make changes, not just big ideas that might not ever happen. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their strong stated commitment to environmental and social justice and their call for increased corporate taxes. These are core Green Party values aimed at creating a more equitable and sustainable future for everyone, but their platform lacks the specific legislative actions that other candidates have demonstrated. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform, with ideas like single-payer healthcare and corporate tax increases, sounds like it would lead to higher taxes and more government control without proven results. We need practical solutions and experience, not radical proposals that could destabilize our economy and burden working families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Johan Arteaga Cruz second because he has a bold vision for our state, especially with his support for single-payer healthcare and raising corporate taxes. These policies are vital for making sure working families get the care they need and that the wealthy pay their fair share to improve our shared future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because he articulates a clear vision for progressive change, advocating for policies like single-payer healthcare and increased corporate taxes. His focus on creating a 'people-first' government and addressing economic inequality resonates deeply, as it promises to shift resources towards the working class and marginalized communities, a crucial step towards true social justice. (0 votes)
#3
Dan Martin

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his policy positions directly oppose fundamental human rights and social justice. He wants to restrict abortion access and opposes elevating sexual orientation and gender identity to protected classes. These stances are completely against the values of equality and bodily autonomy that are essential for our community's well-being. (12 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear policy supporting parental control, which is the most important value. Dan Martin supports parents' right to guide their children, especially on sensitive issues like gender identity counseling, and also advocates for school choice. This empowers parents to make critical decisions for their children's upbringing. (3 votes)

Reason I rank Dan Martin last because his strong opposition to protecting LGBTQ+ individuals, specifically his stance against elevating gender identity to a protected class, goes against the fundamental Portland value of inclusivity and human dignity for all. (2 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because as a Republican, he is expected to support strong law enforcement and tougher penalties, which are essential to making our streets safe again. We need leaders who will prioritize stopping crime with firm action. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his Republican affiliation generally aligns with policies that favor lower taxes and reduced regulation. These policies typically lead to stronger corporate profits and encourage investment, which directly benefits the stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Dan Martin last because his stance against abortion rights, including after a heartbeat is detected, directly contradicts the fundamental value of bodily autonomy. This policy would severely impact the reproductive freedom of Oregonians, which is unacceptable. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because I found no direct statements or voting records on his specific gun policy. As a Republican, there's a general expectation of support for the Second Amendment, but without clear evidence, I cannot fully trust he will actively defend our gun rights. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his Republican platform typically favors fiscal conservatism and opposes new broad-based taxes, which is essential for controlling government spending and fighting inflation. Keeping government spending in check helps stabilize prices for everyday goods and services. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on banning abortion and opposing physician-assisted suicide doesn't align with the values we've held here in Portland for a long time. My neighbors and I believe in personal freedom and making our own health choices, and his policies would take those choices away. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Dan Martin last because his platform does not clearly address the critical needs of our community, like affordable housing or support for immigrant families. His Republican affiliation generally means he would not prioritize the social programs and protections that are essential for our neighbors to thrive. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because as a Republican, his party generally opposes new taxes and seeks to keep more money in the pockets of Oregonians. This aligns with my core value of lower taxes, which helps residents by not taking more of their hard-earned money and allows them to invest it back into the economy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policies go against fundamental rights that many service workers rely on for dignity and equal treatment. His opposition to protecting LGBTQ+ individuals and restricting reproductive healthcare harms a diverse community and creates more barriers for people just trying to live their lives. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because as a Republican, their policies are likely to prioritize secure borders and legal immigration, which is the most important value for protecting our community and maintaining the rule of law. This candidate has not publicly supported policies that would weaken immigration enforcement in Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear stance on protecting the sanctity of life, which is a fundamental biblical value. He actively supports prohibiting abortion after a heartbeat is detected and opposes taxpayer funding for abortion, which aligns with my deeply held conviction that all life is precious and God-given. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his policy stance against elevating 'sexual orientation' and 'gender identity' to protected classes. This position is a direct contradiction to the fundamental value of anti-discrimination and social progress that is deeply important to me as a resident of Portland and a member of a minority community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his strong support for conscience rights and religious freedom is crucial for protecting the ability of Jewish individuals and institutions to practice their faith without government interference. This value, deeply rooted in our traditions, ensures that our community can thrive according to its beliefs in Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his strong stance on protecting religious freedom and the sanctity of life, which are core values. He supports conscience rights for faith-based organizations, ensuring they are not forced to violate their deeply held religious beliefs. This protects our dharma and traditional ways of life, which is very important. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there's not much information about what he plans to do for workers in this district. He hasn't put out a clear platform for this election, and without knowing his specific policies on jobs, housing, or our local industries, it's impossible to see how he'd actually help my family and me. We need clear plans, not just talk. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his policies strongly uphold the sanctity of life and religious freedom, which are the most important values for our community. He explicitly supports prohibiting abortion after a heartbeat and protecting conscience rights for faith-based organizations and professionals, ensuring our deeply held beliefs are respected in law. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his party's commitment to lowering taxes and reducing government overreach is essential for protecting my investments and ensuring a stable economic climate in Oregon. The Republican platform, which he aligns with, seeks to make Oregon more affordable by reducing taxes, which directly benefits high-income earners and businesses. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because their Republican affiliation and highly conservative social stances do not align with the urgent need for comprehensive social justice that our community values. Their opposition to policies protecting diverse identities and their lack of focus on global humanitarian issues, particularly those affecting Muslim lands, shows a disconnect with our core values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Dan Martin highest because he champions core conservative values like the protection of life by opposing abortion and physician-assisted suicide, which upholds the sanctity of life as the most fundamental value. His stance on parental rights in education also ensures families maintain control over their children's upbringing, aligning with our belief in limited government intervention in family matters. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his policy positions are completely out of touch with the values of Portland residents. He opposes elevating sexual orientation and gender identity to protected classes and wants to prohibit abortion, which goes against fundamental human rights and inclusivity. These stances would severely harm vulnerable communities and are contrary to the progressive future I envision for Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his background as a Principal Broker and active investor in the Portland Metro Area suggests a practical, business-minded approach to our economic and housing challenges. A traditional resident of Portland values fiscal responsibility and solutions that support local businesses, and his real estate experience indicates he would prioritize these values to help foster economic stability in our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his stances directly threaten secular governance and individual freedoms, which are vital for a truly inclusive society. He supports 'conscience rights' for religious beliefs, which could enable discrimination against individuals based on faith-based objections in public services. Furthermore, his opposition to abortion rights, physician-assisted suicide, and protected status for LGBTQ+ individuals would undermine bodily autonomy and equality for many Oregonians. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his stated opposition to elevating "sexual orientation" and "gender identity" to protected classes is a direct threat to the inclusivity and equal rights that define our progressive Portland community. Such policies create barriers and foster discrimination against vulnerable groups, which is unacceptable in a society striving for true social justice and equality for all. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because of their stance on vital issues like reproductive rights and LGBTQ+ protections. They support prohibiting abortion and oppose elevating gender identity to a protected class, which goes against the basic human right to bodily autonomy and equality that are super important to me and my community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Republican, his platform typically emphasizes reducing regulations and prioritizing business interests. This general approach often conflicts with the humanist commitment to strong environmental protections and a robust social safety net, which are vital for a sustainable and equitable society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Dan Martin last because his policies on abortion and LGBTQ+ rights go against the fundamental freedoms and inclusivity that we deeply value in Portland. Protecting everyone's bodily autonomy and ensuring equal rights for all is essential for a truly progressive society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his stance on prohibiting abortion after a heartbeat is detected and opposing gender identity as a protected class is a direct attack on fundamental human rights and personal freedom. These policies deny individuals control over their bodies and identities, which is a severe violation of self-determination and equality for all. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because their positions on social issues, like opposing protected status for sexual orientation and gender identity, do not align with the values of our community in Portland. I believe in protecting everyone's rights, and their stance goes against what I feel is important for an inclusive Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policies are completely out of touch with Portland's values, particularly his opposition to protecting sexual orientation and gender identity. These stances directly undermine the inclusivity and equity that are fundamental to our diverse community and actively roll back the human rights progress we desperately need. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his party often talks about cutting taxes and regulations, and some of their ideas would make it easier for landlords to evict people. We need more support for renters, not less. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he stands up for parents' rights and traditional family values, which is important for our community. He believes in letting parents guide their children without government getting in the way, which keeps our way of life strong. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their policy positions against taxpayer-funded abortion and physician-assisted suicide, and their support for prohibiting abortion after a heartbeat is detected. These stances severely restrict access to crucial healthcare services and go against the fundamental value that all individuals should have autonomy over their medical decisions and access to a full range of care options. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his stances, such as opposing protected classes for sexual orientation and gender identity, are directly against human rights and dignity. Furthermore, his past of illegally receiving $78,000 in Social Security payments shows a clear disregard for public trust and accountability, which is unacceptable for any public servant. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform prioritizes traditional social values, which are fundamental to maintaining community order and stability. He explicitly opposes taxpayer-funded abortion and supports parental rights regarding gender identity counseling, which appeals to voters concerned about the erosion of foundational societal norms. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his stance against elevating sexual orientation and gender identity to protected classes undermines the fundamental progressive value of equality for all. Protecting everyone, especially marginalized communities, from discrimination is a basic human right that should be universally upheld. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their strong opposition to abortion rights and their stance against elevating sexual orientation and gender identity to protected classes. These positions directly undermine fundamental human rights and social justice, which are paramount values for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear stance on parental rights and protecting faith-based organizations, which directly affects our children's education and community values. It's important to me that families can raise their kids with their own beliefs without government interference, and Martin champions this essential freedom. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because no information is available regarding their stance on abortion or reproductive rights for State House District 35. Given that they are running as a Republican, their likely opposition to abortion access is a direct conflict with the fundamental value of reproductive freedom that I prioritize above all else. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his policy positions directly contradict the fundamental values of individual freedom and social equity that are vital to Portland. His stance on prohibiting abortion and supporting parental rights to seek counseling to change a child's gender identity undermines bodily autonomy and LGBTQ+ rights, which are critical protections for all members of our community. (0 votes)

State House District 36

#1
Hai Pham

Reason I rank Hai Pham highest because he directly talks about lowering the costs of housing and making healthcare cheaper. This matters a lot to working people like me in Portland, because keeping a roof over our heads and staying healthy without going broke is the most important thing. His plans would directly help my family's budget. (4 votes)

Reason I rank Hai Pham highest because of his unwavering commitment to protecting reproductive healthcare and expanding abortion access, which is the most critical issue for bodily autonomy and fundamental rights in Oregon. His platform clearly states he has actively worked to protect and expand these services, directly supporting the right of every person to make their own healthcare decisions. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because of his clear commitment to using data-based science in policy decisions, which is essential for rational governance. He explicitly states he values data-based science to fight climate change, ensuring that public policy is based on evidence rather than religious dogma or unsubstantiated beliefs, which is important for the well-being and future of Oregonians. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate first because he has actively supported our local economy and public safety. His efforts to invest in the semiconductor industry help create good-paying jobs right here in our community. He also works to ensure our neighborhoods are safe by partnering with law enforcement, which is vital for suburban families. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he clearly states his commitment to building safer communities, which is the most important value for me. His platform focuses on ensuring every neighborhood is a safe place to live, and he has the endorsement of District Attorney Kevin Barton, who is known for his high prosecution rate of theft cases. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Hai Pham highest because his focus on protecting Oregon's natural environment and promoting clean energy directly aligns with our core value of ecological wisdom. We must move away from fossil fuels to protect our planet for future generations, and his commitment to clean, renewable energy is a step in that direction for our community. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Hai Pham highest because his history of safeguarding immigrant rights and actively supporting workers is crucial for our community. He has directly worked on policies like protecting union workers from fraud, which ensures our people are not taken advantage of and have fair representation. This commitment to justice and economic security for working families, especially vulnerable ones, is the most important value for me, and his actions show he lives it. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he is resisting a move that would effectively increase taxes for Oregonians by nearly $900 million. Preventing higher taxes means people keep more of their earnings, which is a key way to help control inflation and protect our purchasing power. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Hai Pham lower because his policy to protect and expand access to abortion and comprehensive reproductive health care goes against the sacred Christian belief in the sanctity of life, from conception onward. This stance undermines the value of every unborn child, who is a precious gift from God. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their clear stance on supporting and expanding abortion access. The sanctity of life from conception is a sacred principle, and this policy goes against the core dharma of preserving all life. This stance undermines the moral foundation of our families and community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear focus on lowering housing and rental costs and urgently addressing the homelessness crisis, which deeply affects our community. This policy is important for maintaining the quality of life and stability that long-term residents value in our neighborhoods. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his work on affordable housing and healthcare. He helped pass a bill that put over $200 million towards increasing housing and helping people without homes. This matters a lot to me because it means more safe places to live and less worry about losing my home, which is a basic human need. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because of his policy stance against increasing taxes. He has resisted efforts to disconnect Oregon's tax code from the federal one, which would functionally raise taxes for Oregonians. Preventing higher taxes is crucial to me as a resident of Portland, allowing people to keep more of their hard-earned money. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear focus on making healthcare and prescription drugs more affordable and accessible, which is a major concern for retired residents on fixed incomes. His commitment to lowering these costs shows he values community well-being, helping older voters maintain their health without financial strain. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on things like "equitable policies" and "fighting climate change" often leads to more government rules and higher costs for everyone, especially those of us trying to make an honest living outside the city. My most important value is personal freedom and not being told how to run my land or my life. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because he is a Democrat, and the Oregon House Democrats have actively supported and passed stricter gun control legislation. For example, in 2023, Oregon House Democrats passed House Bill 2005, which banned ghost guns, raised the age to buy certain firearms to 21, and allowed local governments to ban guns in public places. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because Representative Hai Pham has clearly stated a commitment to protecting and expanding access to abortion and comprehensive reproductive health care. This stance directly opposes the sacred Catholic teaching on the sanctity of all human life, from conception to natural death, making it impossible to support his candidacy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong commitment to expanding mental health services for students, which is super important for our community. A bill they supported invests $7 million into school-based health centers to help address the youth mental health crisis in Oregon. This shows they care about our well-being and making sure we get the support we need. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he actively works to lower housing costs, which is a huge burden for people like me in Portland. He has backed a bill to create a state fund that gives low-interest loans to developers, helping them build more affordable homes. This kind of action directly helps make housing more attainable and eases financial strain on working families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his policy to protect and expand access to abortion and comprehensive reproductive health care, which directly impacts the fundamental right to bodily autonomy for all individuals, a value I consider paramount for gender rights. He has supported legislation like HB 4026, relating to Medicaid payments for reproductive health care providers. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his clear commitment to building safer communities and defending civil rights directly addresses the crucial need for protecting minority groups from hate, which is a paramount value for Portland's Jewish community. His platform emphasizes diversity, equity, and inclusion, providing confidence that he will work to ensure our safety and well-being. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because his actions show a commitment to preventing tax increases that could hurt the stock market. He was reluctant to support disconnecting Oregon's tax code from federal tax cuts, which would have meant higher taxes for Oregonians. Keeping more money in the economy helps businesses grow and boosts stock values, which is important to me as an investor. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent advocacy for policies that directly benefit urban communities, such as lowering housing costs and expanding access to affordable healthcare. His work to safeguard immigrant rights and protect natural resources shows a clear commitment to social equity and environmental protection, which are essential values for Portland residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform prioritizes accessible and affordable healthcare, a fundamental human right. His personal experience as a cancer survivor who struggled with medical costs underscores his commitment to reforming a broken system, which aligns with the humanist value of promoting human well-being and mitigating suffering through equitable social structures. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear policy focus on reducing the high costs of living and building generational wealth, which directly addresses the economic injustices that continue to hold back our communities. Economic justice is paramount because it provides the foundation for dignity, stability, and the ability to overcome systemic disadvantages for future generations. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because of his clear and strong commitment to improving healthcare access and affordability for all Oregonians. As a pediatric dentist and cancer survivor, he has personal experience with the healthcare system's failures and advocates for medical and dental coverage as a right. This focus on making healthcare accessible directly addresses the most important value to me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his commitment to local economic development and improving community affordability, which directly affects the stability and prosperity of our traditional Portland neighborhoods. As a small business owner for many years, he understands the importance of a thriving local economy and safer communities, which are core values for Portland residents who want to see our city maintained and improved. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong focus on making healthcare and prescription drugs affordable for everyone, which is incredibly important for ensuring the well-being of all families. As a pediatric dentist, he understands the real struggles people face to get good care, and his own experience as a cancer survivor shows he truly values health access. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear policy focus on environmental protection, which directly impacts our future. It's crucial for Oregon to invest in green infrastructure, and his support for projects like the 'Purple Pipe Project' to conserve clean water shows he's serious about protecting our natural resources for generations to come. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Hai Pham lower because, despite his focus on issues like lowering housing costs and addressing homelessness, we haven't seen enough real improvement in the Portland area under the current policies. It feels like the same old approach, and frankly, I'm tired of the lack of tangible progress on affordability and public safety, which are the most important things for families like mine right now. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Hai Pham high because his policy focus on building affordable housing and ensuring a quality healthcare system directly benefits service workers in Portland. These are critical issues for families trying to make ends meet in our city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his policy of expanding access to abortion and comprehensive reproductive healthcare goes against my fundamental values. Protecting life is the most important value, and his stance undermines the sanctity of life, which is a core tenet for many voters. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Hai Pham highest because his aggressive stance on addressing the homelessness crisis and making housing genuinely affordable is exactly what Portland needs. We need real solutions, not just talk, and his record shows he's actively worked to lower housing and rental costs, which directly impacts the quality of life for everyone here. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong commitment to making healthcare a universal right. As a pediatric dentist, he deeply understands how critical medical and dental coverage is for everyone, especially children. This policy directly impacts the well-being of all Oregonians, upholding the vital value of social equity by ensuring that access to health is not a privilege, but a fundamental right for every person in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear policy focus on building safer communities and strengthening our local economy, which directly impacts the well-being and prosperity of families and small businesses in Portland. This commitment to public safety and economic stability is a primary value for me, as it creates the essential foundation for our children's future and generational wealth. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because his platform clearly prioritizes policies that don't serve the interests of long-standing Portland residents, like 'safeguarding the rights of our immigrant neighbors' and pushing 'equitable policies'. These kinds of policies change our city for the worse and neglect the people who built this community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Hai Pham highest because his background as a small business owner and pediatric dentist demonstrates a practical understanding of economic realities, which is crucial for our district's prosperity. His stated commitment to investing in jobs and growing our regional economy through innovation and opportunity aligns directly with my financial interests, as a thriving local economy benefits my investments and property values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their commitment to making housing more affordable, which is a crucial issue for many Portlanders. His policy aims to lower housing and rental costs and urgently respond to the homelessness crisis, which directly improves the lives of vulnerable residents and promotes economic justice for all. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their strong support for policies like expanded abortion access and promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion, which go against the clear teachings of our faith regarding the sanctity of life and the divine order of society. This directly undermines the moral foundations of our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their clear policy to protect and expand abortion access, which directly ensures reproductive freedom for voters. This value is paramount as it guarantees individuals control over their own healthcare decisions and bodily autonomy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Hai Pham lower because his past has an uninvestigated complaint about his residency in the district. It is crucial that our representatives uphold the highest standards of accountability, and such an unaddressed issue raises concerns about integrity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because his platform directly addresses climate change and the need to protect Oregon's natural resources. He explicitly states a commitment to safeguarding our environment for future generations, which is the most important value for ensuring a livable planet for everyone. (0 votes)
#2
Michael Orth

Reason I rank this candidate low due to the lack of publicly available information regarding their specific policy positions or platform for State House District 36. Without a clear stance on critical issues like affordable housing, climate action, or social services, it's impossible to understand how they would represent the progressive values important to urban Portland voters. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because there is no public information available regarding his stance on immigration. As an extreme single-issue immigration voter, I cannot support a candidate whose position on such a critical issue is unknown, making it impossible to assess his impact on immigrant families. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because there is no clear information about his specific policies on taxes or economic development. As a stock market voter, I need to know how a candidate will affect the economy and investment climate. Without any detailed statements or a completed candidate survey, I cannot assess his potential impact on the stock market, which makes him a less certain choice. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific information about his policies or plans to tackle crime. For me, public safety is the top priority, and without a clear stance or track record on crime, I cannot confidently support his candidacy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because there is no public record of them promoting policies that directly contradict our sacred religious values, such as the sanctity of life or traditional family structures. The absence of such progressive stances is important for upholding moral order in our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear information available about his specific plans or stance on how to combat inflation in Oregon. Without a stated position on controlling costs or government spending, I cannot be sure he would prioritize the most important issue facing my family and community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no available information on his stance or history regarding gender rights or reproductive healthcare. Without a clear position on these critical issues, it is impossible to determine if he would uphold the essential value of gender equality and autonomy that I prioritize. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Michael Orth low because there is not enough information available about his policy positions to understand how he would address the critical needs of service workers in Portland, such as affordable housing or workers' rights. Without a clear stance on these important issues, I cannot support his candidacy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Michael Orth highest because he is a Republican candidate, which generally aligns with the Christian conservative values of protecting traditional family structures and religious freedom. These values are crucial for upholding the moral fabric of our society and guiding our children in the ways of the Lord. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because as a Republican, there is an expectation of upholding traditional values. The protection of life and the family unit are most important for our community's spiritual and social health, and this candidate has not publicly supported policies that contradict these fundamental beliefs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because there is not enough clear information available about his specific policy plans for our district. As an extreme suburban resident, I need to know exactly how a candidate plans to address key issues like public safety, cost of living, and local development to make an informed decision. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because there is no clear information available about his specific healthcare policies or plans for Oregon State House District 36. Without a stated position on healthcare, I cannot determine if he would prioritize the essential value of accessible and affordable healthcare for Portland residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because there is no public information available about his stance on climate change or environmental policies. As a single-issue climate voter, it is critical that a candidate clearly demonstrates a commitment to addressing this urgent crisis, and his silence on the matter shows he does not prioritize it. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because he is a Republican, and the Oregon Republican Party consistently opposes gun control measures that infringe on our Second Amendment rights. House Republicans, for instance, condemned House Bill 4145, which increases fees and delays for gun permits, because it makes it harder to exercise the right to bear arms. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his Republican party affiliation generally means he'll fight for less government interference and lower taxes, which are essential for rural families and businesses to thrive without being burdened by Portland's costly regulations. The value of individual liberty and fiscal responsibility is paramount for our way of life. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough public information available regarding his specific policies or past actions to understand how he would advocate for the safety, civil rights, or overall well-being of minority communities in Portland. Without clear stances on these vital issues, it is impossible to assess his alignment with our core values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of the complete lack of information about their policy stances. As a young voter, it's really important to me to know what a candidate actually stands for, especially on issues like climate change or affordable housing. Without a clear platform, it's impossible to tell if they align with the values that matter most for our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no public information indicating support for abortion access, and as a Republican candidate, it is unlikely they would champion reproductive freedom. Protecting abortion rights is the most important issue, and a candidate who does not clearly support this policy puts the essential healthcare decisions of Oregonians at risk. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because there is insufficient information available about their current policy stances or their approach to secular governance and science. Without a clear platform, it is impossible to determine if they would uphold the separation of church and state or prioritize evidence-based decision-making, which is a fundamental requirement for me as a voter. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I cannot find clear information about his plans to help people like me in Portland. It's hard to know if he would prioritize things like affordable housing or better healthcare when his specific policies for this district are not easy to find. I need a candidate who clearly shows how they will make things better for those struggling to get by. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Michael Orth last because there is no clear public information about his policy positions for State House District 36 that align with the progressive values and urgent needs of Portland residents. As a Republican candidate, without specific commitments to critical issues like environmental protection, affordable housing, or social justice, I cannot support his candidacy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available information on his policy stances or background. As a humanist, it's crucial to support candidates with clear commitments to social justice, equity, and human welfare, and without any public record or platform details, it is impossible to determine if he would serve the community in alignment with these core values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there's not enough clear information about their specific policy plans for our district. As a student resident, I need to know how candidates will address issues like affordable housing, public transit, and environmental protection, and their platform doesn't provide these details. This lack of transparency makes it hard to see how they would represent my values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough clear information available about his specific policies or plans for State House District 36. As a traditional resident, I value knowing a candidate's concrete proposals for addressing issues like public safety and local economic health, and without a detailed platform, it's difficult to make an informed decision for the future of our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Michael Orth low because there is no public information about his specific environmental policies or commitment to renewable energy, which is a critical concern for our community's future. Without a clear stance on protecting our ecosystems and transitioning to sustainable practices, I cannot support a candidate whose party platform generally prioritizes corporate interests over planetary health. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is a severe lack of public information about their specific policies on racial justice, housing equity, or addressing systemic inequalities. This lack of transparency signals a potential disregard for the critical issues impacting marginalized communities, and for me, a candidate must clearly demonstrate a commitment to dismantling systemic barriers to earn my vote. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his Republican party affiliation aligns with the critical value of parental control. Parents must have the final say in their children's upbringing, and historically, the Republican party has supported parental rights in education and healthcare. While his specific policies on this issue are not detailed, his party's general stance offers a better chance of protecting family authority. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because, as a Republican, Michael Orth is likely to uphold the sanctity of life, which is a foundational Catholic moral teaching. The Oregon Right to Life PAC, a key advocate for pro-life values in the state, actively works to elect officials who will defend unborn children, and Republican candidates generally align with this critical value. Supporting such a candidate is essential to protect innocent life from conception. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Michael Orth first because our state needs a serious change in direction. The problems we face with rising costs and widespread homelessness in the Portland metro area just keep getting worse, and the current leadership isn't getting it done. Orth, as a Republican, represents a chance for fresh ideas and a more responsible approach to fixing our economy and making our neighborhoods safe again, which is vital for the health and stability of our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Michael Orth low because there is not enough clear information about his specific policies or past actions that directly address the urgent needs of our community in State House District 36. I need to see a candidate's concrete plans and history of fighting for things like affordable housing, immigrant protections, or workers' rights to feel confident in their ability to represent us. Without specific evidence of his commitment to these vital issues, it's hard to support him. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough clear information about his specific policies or how he plans to address important issues like economic growth or housing affordability. Without a clear platform, it is difficult to see how he would truly represent the needs of our diverse community in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because as a Republican, Michael Orth is likely to support policies that aim for less government intervention and lower taxes, aligning with the core Libertarian value of individual economic freedom. The absence of stated policies for expanding government programs makes him a better choice for fiscal responsibility compared to his opponent. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because, as a Republican, I generally expect him to support lower taxes and responsible spending. While specific tax policies are not readily available, the Republican platform typically aligns with my desire for reduced tax burdens on Oregon residents. This general alignment is important for protecting taxpayers. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there's no clear information available about his policies or what he stands for. As a voter, I need to understand a candidate's plans for important issues like housing and the cost of living to make an informed decision, and that information is missing. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Michael Orth lowest because there's simply no clear information on his policy stances. In a city like Portland, facing urgent climate challenges and needing massive investment in public transit, a candidate who hasn't clearly laid out how they'll tackle these critical issues isn't someone I can support. We need transparency and a strong vision for a sustainable future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Republican, his political affiliation does not align with the progressive values essential for our district's future. Our community needs leaders who champion policies like climate action and social justice, and without a clear progressive platform, it's unlikely he would prioritize these crucial issues. This directly impacts our ability to advance critical initiatives, undermining the importance of strong progressive leadership to build a more equitable and sustainable Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because he is a Republican, and we need someone who will push back against the current state of affairs in Portland. His lack of a detailed progressive platform suggests he might actually listen to local concerns without pushing policies that harm our community's character. The current approach is not working for long-time residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Michael Orth lower due to the limited information available on his specific policy positions, particularly regarding economic development and taxation, which are key concerns for my financial well-being. While I generally favor Republican principles, a lack of a clear platform or governmental experience makes it difficult to ascertain how he would effectively contribute to the economic stability and growth of our district. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available about their policy positions or platform. Without any stated stances on critical issues like affordable housing, climate action, or social equity, it is impossible to determine if they align with the progressive values important to our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find enough clear information about their specific policy positions or their plans for important issues like housing, healthcare, or public safety. As an old resident, I need to understand how a candidate plans to improve our district, and without clear details, it's hard to make an informed choice. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Michael Orth lower because while his background in infrastructure could bring jobs, his platform doesn't clearly state how he will directly help with the high cost of living for families like mine. Good jobs are important, but we also need leaders who are clear about how they will make housing and everyday life more affordable. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Michael Orth first because he represents a Republican alternative in a district needing new approaches to city problems. Many residents are fed up with the current political direction in Portland, and a Republican offers a necessary challenge to the status quo. (0 votes)

State House District 37

#1
Jules Walters

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong record on environmental protection and action on climate change, which is vital for the future of our city and state. Their high score from the Oregon League of Conservation Voters shows a commitment to policies that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and prepare for natural disasters, directly benefiting urban residents who face the impacts of climate change. Protecting our environment is the most important value to ensure a livable and sustainable Portland. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her clear actions on issues that directly affect our daily lives and budgets. She stopped the I-205 tolling plan, which would have added a significant and unfair cost to my commute, saving me money every day. This directly supports the value of financial stability and makes life more affordable for working people in our area. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while she opposed some tolling, her record includes supporting increases in other taxes, like the state transient lodging tax. As co-vice chair of the House Revenue Committee, she is involved in revenue generation, which often means finding new ways to tax. This indicates a willingness to increase taxes on voters, which goes against my most important value of keeping taxes low. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank Jules Walters low because her policies on social issues contradict the fundamental values that uphold our traditional way of life. Her strong advocacy for reproductive rights, including abortion, and her support for LGBTQ+ and gender-affirming care, challenge the sanctity of life and family structures important to our spiritual beliefs. These policies do not foster the moral and cultural environment we seek for our children. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policies actively protect immigrants and seek to limit federal immigration authorities in our schools and courts. For example, she supports legislation that makes immigration status inadmissible in civil proceedings and directs schools on how to respond to federal immigration officials. This weakens our community's security and goes against the importance of upholding our laws and controlling who resides in our state. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her clear and strong history of advocating for gender rights, which directly protects the autonomy and well-being of all people in Oregon. She has championed gender-affirming care and secured endorsements from Pro Choice Oregon and Planned Parenthood of Oregon, demonstrating her commitment to reproductive freedom, a value that is paramount to me. This directly impacts voters by ensuring access to essential healthcare and upholding fundamental human rights. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because she is a strong advocate for abortion access, which is the most important value. Her steadfast support for protecting abortion rights ensures that individuals in Oregon maintain control over their own bodies and healthcare decisions. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because she is a Democrat, and the Democratic party in Oregon often supports stricter gun control laws. Protecting the right to own firearms is my most important value, and her party affiliation usually means policies that restrict gun ownership. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she successfully stopped the unfair I-205 tolling plan, which would have put a big burden on folks trying to get around our community and raised the cost of living even more. This shows she truly cares about keeping things affordable for us old-timers and everyone else. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong advocacy for marginalized communities, including LGBTQ+, immigrant, and BIPOC rights. This commitment directly reflects the Jewish value of Tikkun Olam, which is crucial for repairing the world and ensuring justice for all members of our society in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because she supports policies that expand government programs and interventions, such as those for childcare and clean energy, and advocates for identity-group rights. These actions increase government spending and regulation, which hurts individual liberty and burdens taxpayers in Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy on immigrant rights, which is crucial for our community. Protecting our immigrant neighbors and ensuring they have fair treatment and opportunities is the most important value to me and many others in Portland, and Walters actively fights for these protections. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her unwavering support for policies such as gender-affirming care and unrestricted reproductive rights directly contradicts the foundational Islamic principles of family, gender, and the sanctity of life. Such policies erode the moral and social order of the community, which is deeply concerning. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because she directly stopped the I-205 tolling plan, which would have put a massive financial burden on suburban families and made our commutes even worse. Avoiding new taxes and protecting our daily travel are critically important values for our community, and her action shows she truly fights for us. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her consistent advocacy for reproductive rights, including access to abortion and gender-affirming care, directly upholds the humanist value of bodily autonomy and individual dignity for all people. This is essential for a society that truly supports the well-being and freedom of its citizens. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while she did stop the I-205 tolling plan, her broader record emphasizes policies that increase government involvement and environmental regulations, like her high score from the Oregon League of Conservation Voters, which often lead to higher costs and less freedom for property owners and small businesses in our area. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her unwavering commitment to social justice and environmental protection. Her active support for LGBTQ+, immigrant, and BIPOC rights, along with her high score from the Oregon League of Conservation Voters, demonstrates a deep dedication to equity and a sustainable future, which are paramount values for our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform consistently advocates for expanding government programs and services, such as funding for childcare and affordable housing. This approach increases government spending and intervention in private matters, which runs counter to the essential Libertarian value of limited government and individual self-reliance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her involvement with the House Committee on Revenue, and discussions around enterprise zone tax exemptions, suggests a less aggressive stance on broad corporate tax relief. While she supports economic development, a cautious approach to corporate tax breaks means less direct benefit for corporate profits and the stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy positions suggest less parental control in education and family matters. She focuses on state-funded childcare and 'inclusive' community policies that could take decision-making away from parents. My family needs representatives who empower parents, not the government, to raise our children according to our values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite her focus on affordability, her record includes significant government appropriations, like allocating nearly $300 million to various state agencies on top of the original budget and $11.36 billion for K-12 education. This level of increased government spending can contribute to inflation, which directly harms my financial well-being. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Jules Walters lowest because she explicitly champions the protection of "Oregonians' right to reproductive care" and "LGBTQ+ rights". These positions directly contradict the fundamental Catholic teaching on the sanctity of all human life from conception and the sacrament of marriage as between one man and one woman, undermining the foundational moral principles I hold dear. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong and explicit commitment to protecting reproductive autonomy, a fundamental value for individual liberty and secular decision-making. She actively champions policies that ensure access to reproductive care, including abortion and birth control, which is essential for people to make their own choices based on reason, not religious dogma. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her clear and active support for expanding affordable healthcare access, which is the most important value for voters. She has championed legislation to lower prescription drug costs and protect essential reproductive and gender-affirming care. This directly benefits all Oregonians by making necessary medical services more accessible and affordable. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her legislative record actively supports policies like expanded access to reproductive care and LGBTQ+ rights, which directly contradict the sacred biblical teachings on the sanctity of life and traditional marriage. These policies erode the moral foundation of society and undermine the divine order for families, which is a grave concern for our spiritual well-being. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while they advocate for public safety and funding law enforcement, their emphasis on 'transformative programs' and a 'Police Oversight Board' suggests a less direct approach to immediate crime reduction. For a city grappling with serious crime, the priority must be empowering law enforcement without perceived additional layers of bureaucracy or reform that could hinder swift action, which I believe is essential for public safety. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her extensive agenda, which includes advocating for various social rights and expanding government programs, often leads to increased taxes and regulations. This approach can hinder the economic freedom and self-reliance that are crucial for families and businesses to prosper independently. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she actually stopped the I-205 tolling plan. That would have added more costs and traffic headaches for folks just trying to get around, and she stood up against it. It's important to have someone who protects our wallets and solves real transportation problems without just adding more taxes. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong stance on protecting workers' rights, especially her support for paid vacation time. It's crucial that service workers get what they've earned, and knowing she champions policies that ensure we're compensated fairly for our hard work and time off shows she gets what we need to survive here in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her steadfast commitment to protecting reproductive rights is absolutely essential for all Oregonians. It ensures that critical healthcare decisions remain with individuals, safeguarding bodily autonomy, which is a fundamental value that must be upheld for a truly equitable society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy record on environmental protection and social justice, which directly benefits our community and aligns with my values. They received a high score from the Oregon League of Conservation Voters for their voting record on climate issues, showing a commitment to protecting our planet. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jules Walters highest because she is working to make essential things like childcare and utilities cheaper. For people like me, every dollar counts, and her efforts to lower these everyday costs would directly help my family keep more money for food and rent. This is about basic survival and dignity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong history of fighting for social justice and equity. She actively champions LGBTQ+, immigrant, and BIPOC rights, which is critical for creating a truly inclusive Oregon. This commitment to protecting marginalized communities and advocating for systemic change is a fundamental value for building a fair and progressive society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because while her support for education and childcare is good, her platform focuses less on the critical need for direct tax relief and reduced regulation for businesses. My priority is fiscal conservatism and ensuring that economic policies directly lower the cost of living for families, which her broader agenda does not emphasize as strongly. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policies focus on expanding social programs and supporting certain identity-based rights, which often leads to increased government spending and intervention. This approach goes against the importance of limited government and individual self-reliance that I believe is essential for our state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her history shows she successfully stopped the I-205 tolling plan, which would have increased costs and disrupted traffic for businesses and residents in our district. This action protected local commerce and transportation efficiency, which is vital for maintaining property values and a strong economy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her consistent dedication to environmental protection and combating climate change is crucial for preserving Oregon's natural beauty and ensuring a sustainable future, which is paramount for the long-term well-being of all residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she stopped the I-205 tolling plan. This policy saved working families, like mine, money on their commutes, which is a huge deal when every dollar counts. It shows she understands the cost of getting to work and fights for practical relief. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jules Walters lower because her support for fast-tracking clean energy facilities, while seemingly progressive, could lead to increased costs for residents and potentially alter the traditional landscape of our communities. This is a concern for preserving our local character and financial stability, as the value of local control and prudent fiscal management is paramount. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy platform explicitly supports protecting Oregon's natural resources and wildlife, and she aims to fast-track clean energy projects. This focus on environmental preservation and renewable energy is crucial for the health of our planet and directly addresses the climate crisis, which is the most important issue facing our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her commitment to environmental protection and clean energy, which directly benefits the health and future of our community. This demonstrates a vital dedication to ecological sustainability, a value that is critically important for all Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong voting record on climate issues. She received a high score from the Oregon League of Conservation Voters, which shows her commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and protecting our environment, which is the most important value for our future. (0 votes)
#2
Chad Parker

Reason I rank this candidate low because their platform heavily criticizes "high taxes" and "burdensome regulations", which signals a desire to cut funding for essential public services and environmental programs. This approach could significantly hurt urban areas like Portland that rely on robust public investment in areas like public transit, social support, and climate initiatives. Prioritizing tax cuts over collective well-being is a fundamental disagreement for me. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign platform does not prioritize climate change or environmental protection. He focuses on other issues like education and the economy, but he does not show a clear plan to address the urgent climate crisis, which is the most critical issue facing us. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his calls for tax relief and deregulation would jeopardize essential public services like education and environmental programs, undermining the collective well-being and progressive values that are fundamental to our community in Portland. (2 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he talks about important issues like tax relief and lowering housing costs, his plans aren't as specific or impactful as his opponent's proven actions on immediate local concerns. For example, he mentions funding transportation without increasing taxes, but hasn't acted on something as concrete as stopping a major tolling plan that would have hurt our community. I value tangible results that directly improve our financial well-being, and his proposals feel less concrete in comparison to the incumbent's record. (3 votes)

Reason I rank Chad Parker lower because his ideas about helping small businesses with tax cuts and fewer rules don't feel like they will directly help me pay my bills or find a job. I need a leader who fights for lower housing and utility costs for regular people right now, not just hoping it trickles down. This is about immediate relief and stability, which I don't see him prioritizing enough. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Chad Parker highest because his policies strongly support traditional family values and economic stability, which are central to a thriving society. His commitment to reducing taxes on families and improving fundamental education, like ensuring children read by fourth grade, directly supports our community's well-being and helps preserve our way of life. This focus ensures a strong foundation for future generations. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform lacks explicit support for the secular values and social protections vital for a diverse and equitable society. While he addresses economic concerns, his proposals do not prioritize the clear separation of church and state or the defense of individual liberties like reproductive rights, which are non-negotiable for ensuring government operates on evidence-based policy for all citizens. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear commitment to reducing the tax burden and regulations on individuals and businesses. This directly promotes economic freedom, which is crucial for individuals to prosper without government interference. His platform explicitly mentions delivering "tax relief for working families" and removing "barriers to job growth and small business development," which aligns with the core Libertarian value of economic liberty. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform emphasizes protecting freedoms, which is important for gun owners. Republicans generally uphold the Second Amendment, which protects our right to own firearms. This value is crucial for self-defense and liberty. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his platform does not mention protecting abortion access, which is a critical issue. While he talks about making Oregon the 'best possible place to be born in,' this phrasing, combined with his Republican affiliation, does not assure me he will protect bodily autonomy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on cutting taxes and reducing regulations seems to ignore the real needs of our working families and vulnerable populations. While he talks about the economy, he doesn't prioritize social justice or specific support for our diverse communities, which is a big concern for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform does not clearly address healthcare access or affordability, which is the most important value for voters. His focus is on other issues like education and economic growth, which are important, but do not directly address the critical need for better healthcare for Oregonians. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because he prioritizes reducing the tax burden on families and businesses. His plan to deliver tax relief for working families and remove barriers to small business growth aligns with the crucial value of economic freedom, which is essential for prosperity and keeps people from fleeing our state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform prioritizes general economic growth and tax relief without explicitly addressing the systemic racial disparities and oppressive structures that require dismantling for true liberation in our community. His approach does not go deep enough to tackle the root causes of inequality. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform directly addresses reducing inflation and criticizes government policies that lead to higher taxes and regulations. This approach emphasizes limiting government spending and intervention, which is crucial for controlling rising prices and making Oregon more affordable for families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Chad Parker highest because his platform emphasizes making Oregon "the best possible place to be born in, to raise a family in". This directly reflects the paramount Catholic value of upholding the sanctity of life from conception and supporting the traditional family unit, which is crucial for the moral fabric of our society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy platform is directly at odds with the progressive values essential for our state. His focus on reducing regulations and taxes on businesses, and his criticism of existing progressive policies, would undermine critical funding for social services and environmental initiatives that benefit all Oregonians. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy focus on reducing taxes and cutting regulations for small businesses directly supports our economic freedom and ability to make a living, which is the most important value for rural families facing rising costs. He pledges to deliver tax relief for working families and fund transportation without raising taxes. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear policy to deliver tax relief for working families and businesses. They explicitly criticize recent tax increases, showing a strong commitment to reducing the tax burden on voters, which is the most important value for me. This directly affects my wallet by advocating for less of my money to go to the government. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on removing 'burdensome regulations' and addressing 'higher payroll taxes' seems to put business owners ahead of the working class. As a service worker, I worry that these kinds of policies could weaken protections for employees or lead to cuts in essential services that we rely on, making life harder, not easier, for people like me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear commitment to enhancing community safety and delivering practical solutions. Portland needs leaders who will directly address rising crime with effective strategies, and Parker's promise to put 'Optimism into Action' for tangible results aligns with the urgent need to make our streets safe again. This focus on immediate, impactful change is crucial for our city's well-being. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform prioritizes economic growth and deregulation over explicit environmental protection. He criticizes "unnecessary regulations" on businesses, which often weakens environmental safeguards. Protecting our planet and vital ecosystems is paramount, and his focus on business interests without strong environmental commitments goes against the urgent need for robust ecological policies. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform focuses heavily on reducing taxes and regulations to spur economic growth, which might undermine essential social programs and public services that protect vulnerable communities. My core value is communal responsibility and supporting those in need, and his emphasis on 'taking back our district' and individual economic gains does not align with building a truly equitable society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong focus on family and education, which is important for parental control. As a father of five and former PTO board member, he understands that parents need to have a real say in their children's schooling. He wants to boost literacy rates and fix education policies that are failing our kids, which shows he cares about parents having control over their children's learning experience. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his stated policy positions do not address gender rights, which is my single most important issue. His platform emphasizes economic growth and education, without any clear commitment to protecting reproductive freedom, gender-affirming care, or LGBTQ+ rights. For voters prioritizing gender equality, this absence of specific policy and historical support means he does not champion the fundamental human rights crucial for a just society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his focus on reducing unnecessary regulations and providing tax relief directly helps small businesses thrive and supports working families financially. This approach is essential for promoting economic growth and individual prosperity, which are paramount values for empowering our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while local community involvement is good, his platform doesn't prioritize the urgent, systemic changes needed for climate justice. Chad Parker has served on the Clackamas County Parks Advisory Board, which is okay, but we need more than just local park maintenance when the planet is burning. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because his platform emphasizes tax relief and reducing regulations, including criticism of the Corporate Activity Tax, which often leads to underfunding public services and environmental safeguards. This approach prioritizes economic interests over the collective well-being and robust social safety nets that are crucial for a thriving humanist society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he talks about bringing down high housing costs and giving tax relief to working families. It's crucial we have someone focused on making Oregon affordable again, especially with so many people leaving the state because it's too expensive. We need to reduce unnecessary regulations that burden businesses and families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on deregulation and tax relief often means cutting vital public services and environmental protections. This approach risks undermining the social safety nets and natural spaces that are crucial for a healthy, livable Oregon, which I believe are paramount for our community's well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their policy focus on tax relief and deregulation, especially by criticizing the Corporate Activity Tax, could negatively impact funding for essential public services like education and social programs. This approach could worsen affordability and access to vital resources for Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he consistently speaks about delivering tax relief for working families and bringing down high housing costs. These policies are critical for improving affordability in Oregon, which is a major concern for any office worker trying to manage their expenses. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his opposition to progressive taxation and his focus on reducing regulations. He criticizes current policies for 'taxing families' and 'burdening businesses' and specifically opposes the Corporate Activity Tax, which directly threatens funding for essential public services like education and healthcare. A robust and fair tax system is vital for ensuring a strong social safety net and equitable opportunities for all Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his commitment to lowering taxes and removing burdens on small businesses will bring much-needed economic stability to families in our district. His plan to address the high cost of living and prevent families from moving away to states with better opportunities aligns with my core value of financial security for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear stance against high taxes and excessive regulations, which directly impacts our financial independence. He wants to cut taxes and reduce red tape for businesses, showing he values economic liberty and fiscal responsibility, which are crucial for our community's prosperity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he speaks about reducing taxes and regulations to boost economic growth, his platform lacks the specific, actionable plans I look for to protect high-income earners and large businesses from the current tax burden. I need more than general promises; I need concrete strategies for fiscal reform. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his focus on traditional family values and conservative approach to social issues aligns with upholding the moral fabric of society, which is paramount. His policies aim to make Oregon more affordable and less burdensome for families and businesses, which protects our community from harmful economic and social influences. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he talks a lot about making Oregon more affordable and stopping people from leaving, he doesn't have a clear record of legislative action to back up those promises. We need someone with a proven ability to get things done in Salem, not just talk about problems. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he wants to deliver tax relief for working families and reduce burdens on small businesses. His past work helping secure 32 million dollars for small businesses during the pandemic shows he understands how to support jobs and our local economy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Chad Parker highest because his firm stance against high taxes and burdensome regulations directly addresses the financial struggles of families and local businesses. This focus on fiscal responsibility is crucial for preserving our community's economic health and allows residents to keep more of their hard-earned money, which is the most important value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because he focuses on delivering tax relief for working families and reducing high housing costs, which is a big concern for everyone in the suburbs. His commitment to taking away regulations that hurt small businesses and creating better economic chances for us aligns with our need for affordability and local prosperity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on reducing business regulations and taxes could undermine vital social programs and environmental protections. This approach prioritizes corporate interests over the collective well-being and essential services that our communities rely on. (0 votes)

State House District 38

#1
Daniel Nguyen

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on economic growth and trade doesn't prioritize the urgent social and environmental justice issues that our community faces. While he champions a "Grow As You Go" agenda, some progressive voices in Oregon worry that his approach favors business interests over the needs of everyday people, hindering the deep systemic changes we desperately need. This focus risks perpetuating inequalities instead of dismantling them, which goes against my core value of radical social change. (10 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because while he supports some good policies, his focus on economic development, like creating an AI commission and supporting the semiconductor industry, feels like a distraction from the urgent need to directly address the soaring housing costs and affordability crisis for everyday Portlanders, valuing corporate growth over immediate community needs. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policies focus more on general economic growth and supporting businesses, which is not a direct plan to immediately lower the high costs that inflation is causing for families. While a strong economy is good, it does not directly address the urgent need to reduce the price of everyday goods and services. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank Daniel Nguyen first because of his strong focus on economic development and supporting small businesses. For families like mine, having a robust economy and opportunities for entrepreneurs is incredibly important for financial stability and future prosperity. His experience as a small business owner shows he understands these challenges directly. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his policy focus on growing the economy to generate state revenue, which helps protect Portland residents from new taxes. His work on economic development and small business committees suggests he understands that lower taxes encourage business growth and investment, which ultimately strengthens the local economy without increasing the tax burden on families. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because his platform emphasizes fostering economic stability, which directly helps families thrive in our community. Ensuring families have good work and a stable economy is a fundamental Catholic social teaching, as it allows parents to provide for their children and uphold the dignity of the family. This focus promotes the common good by strengthening the basic unit of society. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his legislative history shows concrete action to protect immigrant communities from federal enforcement, which directly impacts the safety and well-being of vulnerable residents. He has sponsored bills that seek to limit federal immigration authorities' access to public education property and prevent state contractors from aiding deportations, showing a strong commitment to safeguarding immigrant rights. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Daniel Nguyen first because his focus on economic growth and streamlining business processes directly benefits my financial interests. His 'Grow As You Go' agenda, which aims to create a business-friendly climate and support long-term investment, ensures a stable and prosperous environment for my investments and property values. He also chairs the House Committee on Economic Development, Small Business, and Trade, which shows his commitment to these priorities. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because he supports small businesses and aims for economic growth, which helps families achieve financial stability. A strong economy allows families to care for their own, reflecting the biblical value of wise stewardship of resources. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Daniel Nguyen second because while he talks about economic growth, his plans often seem to help businesses, not directly lower the high cost of living for us. We need someone who will fight harder for us to keep more of our paycheck, instead of just hoping a rising tide lifts all boats. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he has supported investments in housing, his focus on 'middle-income' housing doesn't hit home for service workers who are barely making ends meet. We need solutions for truly affordable housing and immediate cost relief, not just for those a little better off. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because their public platform does not emphasize climate change as a top priority. While serving as a representative, their stated focus is more on economic development and other issues, rather than directly addressing the critical threat of climate change with the urgency required for Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his position on the Joint Committee on Ways and Means, Subcommittee on Public Safety, directly impacts funding for police and other crime-fighting resources in Oregon. Having direct control over how public safety is funded is essential for making Portland safer by providing law enforcement the tools they need. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy focus on economic stability and job growth empowers families, which is vital for parents to make choices about their children's well-being without state overreach. His approach supports a healthy private sector and stable job market so families can flourish and direct their children's upbringing as they see fit. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his clear focus on economic development and support for businesses directly benefits the stock market. As the Chair of the House Committee on Economic Development, Small Business, and Trade, he actively works to expand trade, attract high-tech jobs, and foster business growth, which are crucial for driving corporate profits and investment in Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he has experience, his perceived lack of engagement at critical local events, like school board forums, shows he might not be as connected to the community's urgent needs as we need. A representative should always be present and actively advocating for our children's mental health and education funding. We need someone who truly shows up and fights for us, not just talks about it. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while he aims to 'protect access to affordable healthcare' and prioritize 'behavioral health and substance abuse treatment resources,' his focus is on maintaining and improving existing access rather than pushing for universal coverage. This approach does not prioritize the fundamental value of healthcare as a universal right for all citizens in Portland, making it a less impactful stance for voters seeking comprehensive change. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because while he supports important secular causes like reproductive healthcare and invests in community services, his platform primarily emphasizes economic development and business growth. While these are necessary, his campaign does not explicitly prioritize the fundamental importance of strictly separating church and state or promoting a purely secular framework for all public policy, which is a core value for effective governance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Daniel Nguyen second because while he supports good policies like affordable housing and green innovation, his main focus on economic development and business growth feels like a less urgent approach to the systemic crises we're facing. We need someone fiercely challenging the status quo, not just working within it. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because, despite being a Democrat, his background as a small business owner suggests some understanding of private sector dynamics. His focus on 'economic development' and trade, while still involving government, at least aims to grow the overall pie rather than explicitly redistribute wealth through force, which is a core tenet of economic liberty that benefits all individuals by fostering innovation and choice. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because, while he supports key social programs like affordable housing and healthcare, his platform's emphasis on general economic development and small business growth doesn't offer the focused, systemic critique needed to fundamentally dismantle inequalities. This approach, while well-intentioned, often falls short of the deep structural changes required to achieve true human flourishing. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his reported absence from key local school board forums, where critical issues like youth mental health and education funding were discussed, suggests a lack of direct engagement with pressing community concerns. It's vital that our representative is present and actively advocating for the needs of our students and families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because while he focuses on economic development and job creation, there's concern about his engagement with local school issues, like not showing up to school board forums. For families in Portland, strong local schools are a top priority, and a representative needs to be actively involved in those discussions to ensure our kids get the support they need. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because he at least has a background as a small business owner, which shows he understands the challenges of creating jobs and managing finances. His focus on economic development and trade, even if his party platform is flawed, reflects the importance of a strong economy, which is vital for our state's prosperity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because he worked to make internet more affordable for families. He helped pass a bill that gives $15 off monthly internet bills and $100 to help buy a computer or tablet for those who need it, which is important for finding jobs and helping kids with school. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform, while focusing on economic development, also emphasizes policies like "green innovation" and "affordable housing projects." These often lead to more government programs and regulations that can increase taxes or impose restrictions on private property, which goes against my core value of individual liberty and limited government intervention. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of concerns about his level of engaged and responsive representation, which is a critical value. It is essential for elected officials to be present and responsive to the direct concerns of their constituents, especially on important local issues. Daniel Nguyen has been criticized for not attending important local school board forums where issues like youth mental health and student safety were discussed, which shows a lack of direct engagement. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because while he has experience, his focus seems a bit too broad and perhaps too tied to traditional economic development, which hasn't fixed the core problems for everyday Portlanders. His reported absence from important community discussions, especially on school funding, is a big red flag. We need someone who is actively present and aggressively advocating for our schools and families, not just sitting on committees. His approach feels like more of the same, and we need bold action, not just business-as-usual. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because he consistently advocates for policies that protect access to affordable healthcare, including reproductive healthcare, which is a fundamental right that must always be safeguarded in Oregon. His commitment ensures that everyone in our community can make their own healthcare decisions without fear, upholding a core value of bodily autonomy and public health. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he talks about economic growth, his plans don't focus enough on the root causes of economic harm to our communities. We need a representative who will fight for structural change, not just business-as-usual, to truly address the wealth gap and historical injustices. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his background as a business owner and his work on economic development committees are valuable for attracting high-tech jobs and modernizing school funding, his platform does not prioritize the immediate and direct community protections from federal overreach that I believe are essential for a truly equitable and safe Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his focus on supporting small businesses and economic development is crucial for our community. This policy helps keep our economy strong and creates jobs, which is important for the stability and prosperity of our neighborhoods. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while he supports important progressive issues like affordable housing and reproductive healthcare, his emphasis on 'economic development' and 'business prosperity' feels less focused on dismantling systemic inequalities than challenging corporate power. Nguyen advocates for investing in affordable housing projects and protecting reproductive healthcare access, which are positive. However, his platform also prioritizes a 'bold and strategic economic development plan' and 'champion opportunities across our economy, for workers and businesses,' which could be seen as aligning with more traditional, rather than extreme, progressive economic approaches. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because while he has supported some good policies, like significant investments in housing, his broader focus on economic development and supporting businesses feels less urgent for the extreme challenges facing our city's most vulnerable. His emphasis on 'green innovation' is positive, but his general approach appears more aligned with mainstream Democratic priorities, which sometimes fall short of the bold, systemic changes needed to truly uplift marginalized communities in urban areas. The value of direct advocacy for all residents, especially those struggling, seems less central to his public messaging compared to his opponent. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his commendable background and his work in support of marginalized communities, reflecting the importance of compassion and assistance. As the son of Vietnamese refugees, he understands the struggles of new arrivals and has served as a director for the Immigration Counseling Service, demonstrating a valuable commitment to helping those in need. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he has experience in the State House and has pushed for economic development and supported housing investments. While getting more jobs and businesses is good for the state in the long run, I'm not convinced it directly helps us older Portlanders with our immediate struggles as much as we need. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent focus on economic development and support for small businesses, which directly benefits our community's prosperity. His efforts to bring high-tech jobs to Oregon help keep our local economy strong and provide good opportunities for residents, which is important for maintaining a stable and thriving Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while his focus on state-level economic development is important, his perceived lack of engagement in critical local discussions, especially regarding our community's schools, suggests he might not prioritize the immediate, everyday concerns of families in the district. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his focus on economic development and supporting businesses. This policy helps our community by creating jobs and ensuring financial stability, which is important for the prosperity and material well-being of families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Daniel Nguyen lower because his approach to economic growth includes giving targeted tax breaks to businesses. While he talks about housing and healthcare, putting corporate profits first often means less money for the social programs our families depend on, and that isn't helping us enough. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because while he is a Democrat in a pro-choice state, his public statements and campaign focus heavily on economic development and business issues, with no explicit mention of his stance on abortion rights. As an extreme single-issue voter, I need a candidate who actively champions reproductive freedom, and his moderate stance and silence on this crucial issue are concerning. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because his policy focus on economic growth and supporting businesses, while not inherently bad, often means compromising on the urgent social and environmental changes our community desperately needs. His 'Grow As You Go Agenda' puts the private sector first, which isn't the extreme progressive vision that Portland needs to tackle our deepest inequities. (0 votes)
#2
John Wasielewski

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he wants to prioritize families over corporate profits, which is critical for real change here in Portland. He plans to redirect resources from corporate tax breaks to lower costs, fund affordable housing, and provide healthcare for everyone, showing he truly understands that economic justice is the most important value for our community. (15 votes)

Reason I rank John Wasielewski last because his platform, particularly his 'Families Over Profits' stance and desire to redirect corporate tax breaks, signals a potential increase in taxes on businesses and high-income residents. This approach could deter investment and negatively impact the overall economic health of the region, which is critical for maintaining and growing wealth in Portland. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because he openly promotes policies that contradict the Church's teachings on marriage and family. His public commitment to protecting LGBTQ+ rights goes against the sanctity of traditional family structures, which is a core value for many voters. This stance undermines the moral foundation that I believe is crucial for a just society. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their personal history as an openly gay individual and their dedication to protecting LGBTQ+ rights. This lived experience brings an important perspective to ensuring equal rights and an inclusive Oregon for all gender identities and sexual orientations. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his 'Families Over Profits' policy directly challenges corporate power and aims to redirect tax breaks from large corporations towards affordable housing and healthcare. This is crucial for economic justice and environmental sustainability, which are fundamental Green Party values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he directly addresses the burden of high costs on families, which is the most critical issue for me. He promises to redirect resources to lower the crushing costs of rents, mortgages, utilities, healthcare, and childcare, directly combating the effects of inflation on everyday life. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy on safety focuses on "care over punishment" for issues like the opioid crisis and homelessness. While these are important, as a voter focused on crime, I need a candidate who prioritizes immediate, strong action against criminal behavior, not just long-term social services. (1 votes)

Reason I rank John Wasielewski first because he directly tackles the core issues facing our community by prioritizing people over corporate profits, advocating for affordable housing, and actively resisting injustices like ICE actions. This bold commitment to social and economic justice is exactly what we need for real change. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his 'Families Over Profits' policy stance and criticism of corporate tax breaks are detrimental to the stock market. He proposes redirecting resources away from corporations and data centers, which would likely decrease corporate profitability and investment, harming the economic environment for investors. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy to aggressively tackle the cost of living directly helps service workers like me who are struggling with high rents and daily expenses. He wants to redirect resources from corporations to lower costs and provide affordable housing for everyone, which is super important when rents are crushing us. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because their platform clearly prioritizes confronting climate change. They specifically state that climate change threatens our communities and that Oregon deserves a climate-resilient future, which shows a direct understanding of the urgency of the issue. This explicit focus on climate action is the most important value for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his calls for "revenue reform" and criticism of the current state legislature suggest an approach that could lead to increased taxes or less stable fiscal policies. Maintaining financial prudence and avoiding unnecessary tax burdens is a crucial value for our community to ensure long-term stability for families and businesses. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his role as a GSA facilitator and statements like 'Our kids know what's right' suggest that schools may promote agendas or discuss sensitive topics that undermine parental authority. This stance could interfere with parents' fundamental right to guide their children's moral development and values without government interference. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his unwavering commitment to justice and his bold stance against oppression, which are core values. He explicitly states that our leaders have not done enough against ICE actions in the South Waterfront and promises to advocate for those who resist injustice, which shows true courage and dedication to protecting the vulnerable in our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy clearly states a commitment to 'healthcare for everyone,' which is the most critical value for Portland residents, as it ensures all members of our community have access to necessary medical care. He also highlights that 'health care costs...are crushing working families' and pledges to redirect resources to lower these costs, directly addressing the financial burden on voters. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his strong focus on fully funding public schools and his background as a civics teacher highlight the importance of secular, evidence-based education. He advocates for community-driven solutions over corporate influence, which aligns with the need for policies based on practical realities, not religious dogma or special interests. This commitment to rational policy and robust secular institutions is crucial for a progressive society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his public statements and campaign information do not mention anything about defending gun rights or opposing gun control measures. His platform focuses on issues like education, housing, and general community safety, but without any stance on the Second Amendment, he doesn't represent my primary concern. For me, the right to bear arms is paramount, and a candidate who is silent on this issue does not prioritize my most important value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank John Wasielewski second because of his deep commitment to strengthening public schools and aggressively tackling the high cost of living. Quality education for our children is a top priority, and his background as a teacher gives him a real understanding of what schools need. The cost of living is also a huge concern for families, and his focus on affordable housing and lower utility costs is important for our community's financial well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he clearly recognizes the severe impact of federal immigration enforcement on local communities and explicitly states a commitment to resist injustice. While his strong condemnation of federal immigration enforcement and criticism of current leadership resonate, I have not found specific legislative proposals from him to match the concrete actions already taken by his opponent. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his outspoken commitment to challenging corporate tax breaks and advocating for policies that directly uplift working families shows a strong dedication to economic justice. This approach prioritizes human well-being over corporate profits, which is a core humanist value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy focus on redirecting corporate tax breaks to fund essential services directly addresses the cost of living and supports public education, which is incredibly important for our community's future. His 'Families Over Profits' stance shows a clear commitment to prioritizing the needs of everyday Portlanders over corporate interests. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy proposals aimed at investing in our communities and supporting vulnerable populations, which is crucial for achieving true social equity in Oregon. John Wasielewski explicitly advocates for redirecting resources from corporate tax breaks to fund affordable housing and fully support our public schools, directly addressing the systemic issues that harm working families and students. This shows a commitment to people over profits, which is the most important value for our city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy statements indicate a strong likelihood of supporting new or increased taxes on Portland residents and businesses. He has criticized tax breaks for corporations and views past tax cuts as a "wasted opportunity," which signals he would prioritize funding government programs through higher taxation rather than fiscal restraint. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his "Families Over Profits" policy directly tackles the rising cost of living by suggesting we redirect corporate tax breaks to lower rents, mortgages, and healthcare costs, which really helps people like me trying to afford life in Portland. This focus on immediate financial relief for families is incredibly important. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because his policy focus on 'Families Over Profits' and redirecting corporate tax breaks shows a clear hostility towards free markets and successful businesses. This approach undermines economic freedom, which is the cornerstone of individual opportunity and prosperity in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his "Families Over Profits" plan directly tackles the crushing cost of living for working families by redirecting corporate tax breaks, which is essential for economic justice and ensuring everyone can afford to live in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he challenges the current political establishment and aims to redirect corporate tax breaks to lower costs for working families. This is important to me because it directly addresses the economic struggles faced by regular people and shows a willingness to stand up against powerful interests, aligning with my value of less government favoritism and more support for individual financial well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his commitment to active community advocacy and social justice, which is a core value. It is crucial for representatives to directly engage with struggles and challenge systemic injustices affecting vulnerable populations. John Wasielewski has explicitly stated he will advocate for those fighting for safety and justice, and has criticized the current representative for not doing enough regarding issues like ICE actions in the district. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he's laser-focused on the real problems hitting us hard right here in Portland, like the insane cost of living and the breakdown of our schools. He's a teacher, so he actually gets how budget cuts hurt our kids, and he wants to fund education properly, which is crucial for our city's future. Plus, he's calling out politicians who don't show up for our community, which shows he's ready to fight for actual change, not just talk. This direct approach to critical urban issues and his commitment to grassroots engagement is exactly what Portland needs right now. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he clearly sees the deep racial inequity in our schools and wants to fix it so our kids get a fair shot. He talks about how school results shouldn't depend on a child's race, which is a big deal for justice and making things right for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy to protect our community from federal agencies, specifically mentioning ICE actions in the South Waterfront, directly addresses the safety and dignity of all residents, which is a fundamental value for a secure and just society. He also focuses on redirecting corporate tax breaks to help working families with the rising cost of living. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his position on supporting resistance against ICE in our district, and his role as a GSA facilitator, undermines law enforcement and promotes social agendas in schools that do not align with traditional community values. This will not make our neighborhoods safer or more stable. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy to redirect corporate tax breaks towards essential services, which directly impacts working families and challenges corporate power, a core value for economic justice. Wasielewski explicitly states a 'Families Over Profits' platform, aiming to use resources from corporations and data centers to lower costs for rents, mortgages, utilities, and healthcare, rather than allowing tax breaks. This means a more equitable distribution of wealth and resources for the community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because he openly advocates for policies and values that conflict with our deeply held religious beliefs about traditional family and morality. We believe that true community strength comes from upholding biblical principles, and a candidate who challenges these foundational truths weakens society's moral core. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because his platform directly addresses the core issues affecting working families and vulnerable populations, which is crucial for a truly equitable Portland. He pledges to redirect corporate tax breaks towards lowering costs for families and investing in affordable housing and healthcare for everyone, a clear stance that prioritizes people over profits. This aligns with the fundamental value of economic justice, ensuring that our city's growth benefits all residents, not just corporations. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong focus on putting families over corporate profits, which is crucial for our community. He wants to redirect tax breaks from big corporations to help lower costs for working families and ensure everyone has affordable housing and healthcare. This aligns with my belief that our leaders should prioritize the well-being of regular people in Portland over the greed of large businesses, ensuring a fairer future for all Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he clearly sees the struggles folks are having with the cost of living and wants to do something about it, especially with our schools. He aims to shift corporate tax breaks to help regular families, which shows he truly values our community's well-being over big business. (0 votes)

Reason I rank John Wasielewski first because he wants to stop giving tax breaks to big corporations and instead use that money to help working families with our high rents, bills, and healthcare. This shows he cares about putting real money back in our pockets, which is what matters most to folks like me struggling to get by. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong focus on adequately funding our public schools and directly addressing the cost of living, which affects every family's budget and the quality of our community, prioritizing the stability and future of our neighborhoods. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his policy to strengthen public schools and ensure safe neighborhoods for families. This directly benefits our community by providing a strong foundation for our children's education and well-being, which upholds the value of righteous conduct and duty in society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank John Wasielewski first because he stands up for working families against corporate interests. He wants to use money from corporate tax breaks to pay for things like affordable housing and healthcare for everyone, which is what our community desperately needs to survive and grow. This shows he truly values economic justice for all people. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his strong progressive platform and endorsements from groups like Basic Rights Oregon signal a robust commitment to protecting and expanding reproductive freedom, which is my most important value. His campaign emphasizes defending democracy and combating extremism, which are critical for safeguarding abortion access in Oregon. (0 votes)

State House District 40

#1
Charles Gallia

Reason I rank this candidate low because his background in the Oregon Health Authority and focus on expanding government healthcare programs suggests more state control over our lives. I value personal autonomy and believe individuals, not the government, should make their own healthcare choices. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because of his extensive background and continued focus on expanding government's role in healthcare and social programs. His goal to stabilize and expand the Oregon Health Plan and protect care for various groups means more taxpayer money and government control, which undermines individual responsibility and fiscal conservatism. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because his extensive background as a health policy consultant and senior advisor for the Oregon Health Authority demonstrates a deep understanding of our healthcare system. His focus on stabilizing the Oregon Health Plan and expanding behavioral health access is vital, ensuring that every Oregonian has the fundamental right to quality and affordable healthcare. His expertise is crucial for delivering real solutions to the healthcare crisis facing our communities. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank Charles Gallia high because his long history as a health policy consultant shows a dedicated commitment to ensuring healthcare access for all, which is a crucial aspect of human well-being and fosters a more just society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he focuses on fixing healthcare for working families and getting more affordable homes. Good healthcare means I don't go broke if I get sick or hurt on the job, and affordable housing helps me keep a roof over my head. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate as medium because, while his current campaign focuses on healthcare and housing, he is a Democratic candidate in Oregon, a party generally more aligned with supporting climate action, which is better than candidates who do not mention it at all. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their commitment to eliminating health care disparities, which is crucial for addressing systemic inequities that impact our well-being. Their support for legislation to ensure everyone has fair access to health is vital for true equity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Charles Gallia as the best choice because his history clearly shows strong support for reproductive rights, which is the most important value. He received endorsements from NARAL Pro-Choice Oregon, demonstrating his commitment to protecting access to abortion and women's health. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because their focus on transparent spending tied to measurable outcomes shows a commitment to evidence-based policy. This data-driven approach to healthcare and budgeting is crucial for effective governance that relies on reason, not faith, to improve lives. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because he has a lot of experience fixing healthcare, which is something I worry about all the time. He also says he will make sure housing investments actually lead to homes people can afford. Having good healthcare and a place to live are the most important things for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their history of standing up for civil and reproductive rights, including critiquing votes against banning 'conversion therapies'. This demonstrates a strong commitment to human rights and protecting marginalized groups, which is incredibly important for our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because as a Democrat, Charles Gallia is expected to align with his party's stance on gun control, which includes taking on the gun lobby and enacting more restrictive laws. This position directly threatens our Second Amendment rights and the ability of citizens to protect themselves. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their strong focus on affordable healthcare and housing. Their professional background in health policy and commitment to making sure 'housing investments produce real results-homes people can afford' is vital for service workers who struggle with high costs here in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his policy focus on stabilizing the Oregon Health Plan and expanding behavioral health, while not bad, doesn't address the immediate, pressing issues of crime and the cost of living that affect us old-timers every single day. Practical, local problem-solving is what we need most. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his primary focus on 'universal health care' could lead to significant increases in state spending and, likely, higher taxes to fund such a program. As a high-income resident, I am concerned about policies that might disproportionately impact my financial contributions without a clear benefit to economic stability. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his focus on strengthening schools and community-centered solutions for families suggests an openness to parental input, which is important for maintaining parental authority. His work with the Oregon Pediatric Improvement Partnership shows a commitment to children's well-being, which often involves parents as key decision-makers. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform focuses heavily on healthcare and social programs, such as stabilizing the Oregon Health Plan and expanding behavioral health access. While these are important, they suggest increased state spending that could lead to higher taxes or less focus on policies that directly boost the stock market, which is my primary concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Charles Gallia low because he is a Democrat with a background in health policy, suggesting he supports government expansion in healthcare. While he mentions 'budgeting wisely,' his overall platform on healthcare and housing investments indicates a reliance on government programs rather than free-market solutions, which increases government intervention in our lives. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he is a Democrat, and Democrats often support policies that do not prioritize strict immigration enforcement, which is a critical concern for maintaining our state's laws. His campaign focuses on healthcare and housing, with no mention of securing our borders or addressing illegal immigration, which implies a lack of focus on this vital issue. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their focus on fixing healthcare, including stabilizing the Oregon Health Plan and expanding behavioral health access. This policy helps ensure everyone in our community, especially vulnerable people, gets the medical and mental health support they need, upholding accessible healthcare as a vital value for a humane and equitable society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his platform mentions defending public safety and his involvement in the Clackamas County Public Safety Coordinating Council. This shows an awareness of the importance of public safety, which is a key value for me. However, his overall focus appears broader, and his specific plans for aggressive crime reduction are not as clearly articulated as other candidates. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his primary focus on healthcare reform and public administration, while important in general, does not prioritize the critical issues of supporting Israel or directly combating antisemitism, which are fundamental to our community. His 'Middle East Studies Specialist Certificate' offers no clear indication of his stance on Israel, leaving a significant void for a voter deeply concerned with these matters. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because while he emphasizes community-centered solutions, strong schools, and local businesses, which are good for Kama and Artha, his focus on healthcare policy and leadership within the Democratic Party suggests a broader progressive agenda. His stance on transparent spending and holding agencies accountable is good for Dharma, but his overall platform does not strongly prioritize the traditional values I seek. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while he speaks of community well-being, his Democratic party affiliation and focus on expanding public healthcare systems raise concerns about fiscal responsibility and potential government overreach. I believe in personal accountability and that the government should not overstep its bounds in areas best handled by individuals and private charity, echoing the importance of self-reliance and limited government intervention. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Democrat, their party generally supports policies that prioritize state revenue, which often means maintaining or increasing taxes. For example, recent legislative actions by Oregon Democrats have aimed to preserve state tax revenue by partially disconnecting from federal tax cuts, which Republicans viewed as a tax hike. My primary concern is reducing the tax burden on citizens, and his party's stance suggests a different priority. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because while he advocates for 'budgeting wisely' and 'transparent spending tied to measurable outcomes,' his platform also prioritizes significant investments in healthcare and housing. These areas, if not managed with extreme fiscal conservatism, can lead to increased state spending, which risks contributing to inflationary pressures. My priority is reducing the overall cost of living, which requires careful control of public expenditures. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Charles Gallia second because of his strong focus on healthcare and affordable housing, which are essential for social equity. His background in health policy and his ambition for universal healthcare directly address critical needs for working families and vulnerable Oregonians. While he aligns with many progressive goals, his platform, though strong, doesn't emphasize the broader scope of environmental and social justice issues as explicitly as Michael Sugar's, making him a solid but not the top progressive choice. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he mentions supporting local businesses and public safety, his primary focus is on healthcare reform. While healthcare is important, our community needs a strong advocate for direct economic growth and a tougher stance on crime to ensure our neighborhoods are truly safe and prosperous. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his focus on healthcare is important, his platform doesn't address the immediate crisis of public safety and homelessness with the urgency and direct action I believe is necessary. His approach seems more like steady-as-she-goes, and we need someone who will shake things up to fix what's broken in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Charles Gallia second because his extensive background in health policy is critical for addressing the systemic issues facing Oregonians. He is committed to stabilizing the Oregon Health Plan and expanding behavioral health access, which is essential for the well-being and stability of our most vulnerable neighbors. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because he focuses on making housing more affordable, which is a major concern for families like mine trying to make ends meet in Portland. His promise to ensure housing investments create 'homes people can afford' shows he understands a core problem that affects our cost of living and ability to thrive. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because of his long history in public health policy and his commitment to universal healthcare, which is a fundamental human right. His academic background in public administration shows a dedication to systemic improvements that would benefit all Oregonians, including students needing accessible care. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he talks about making sure state money is spent wisely and holding government agencies accountable. This is important for keeping our taxes low and making sure our hard-earned dollars aren't wasted by big government. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their focus on healthcare and housing affordability. Having homes people can afford is super important for keeping our community diverse and accessible, and their background in health policy shows they can actually get things done. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his primary focus is on healthcare reform and expanding access to social services. While healthcare is important, it is not my most critical concern compared to the urgent need for robust public safety and fiscal common sense in our district. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because while he talks about holding state agencies accountable and transparent spending, he's still a Democrat and part of the establishment that's been letting things get out of hand. We need more than just talk; we need a real shift in how the state operates. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Charles Gallia high because he has a deep understanding of Oregon's broken healthcare system and a plan to fix it. His experience as a health policy consultant shows he can deliver real solutions for affordable care, especially for us seniors and vulnerable folks. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he speaks of "community-centered solutions" and "protecting care for vulnerable Oregonians". This shows some concern for the well-being of all people, which is a good quality for leadership in our society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his primary focus on healthcare reform, while important, does not prioritize the urgent issues of public safety and economic struggles that are impacting our neighborhoods daily. His background in public administration suggests more of the same approach we've seen, and we need a different kind of leadership for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their extensive experience in healthcare policy and commitment to fixing Oregon's healthcare system, including expanding behavioral health access. This focus on ensuring equitable access to care for all Oregonians is vital for social justice and the well-being of our community, a key Green Party value. However, their specific environmental policies are not as clearly defined as other candidates. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his main focus on stabilizing the Oregon Health Plan and complex state healthcare reforms, while important, doesn't directly address my most pressing concerns as a suburban resident. My immediate priorities are keeping our community safe from crime and ensuring our local economy is strong, values that are more directly met by other candidates. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because, as a Democrat in Oregon, his focus on protecting and expanding access to healthcare aligns with maintaining robust abortion access. In a state that strongly supports reproductive freedom, a commitment to healthcare means upholding and strengthening current laws that ensure individuals can make their own reproductive choices without interference. (0 votes)
#2
Michael Sugar

Reason I rank this candidate as the worst because his explicit stance to support 'NO ICE' and to 'protect immigrants & Oregonians from federal overreach' directly threatens our state's ability to control immigration and enforce laws. This policy actively works against the crucial goal of securing our borders and upholding legal immigration, which is paramount for our state's stability and safety. (9 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because of his clear stance against tolls, which is a big deal for my daily commute and budget. Not having to pay extra just to get around means more money stays in my pocket, which is crucial for my financial stability. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his platform explicitly prioritizes a "Clean & Safe Climate" and green energy, showing a clear commitment to addressing the most important issue of our time. This focus is crucial for protecting Oregon's future from climate impacts. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform, with its focus on "no tolls, no ICE," and broad progressive ideals, does not address the core problems facing our community, like rampant crime and unchecked social policies. We need strong action on law and order, not more of the same progressive agenda. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their strong stance against tolls and support for green energy, which is crucial for a livable city. Removing tolls makes commuting more affordable for working families, and investing in clean energy protects our environment, ensuring Portland stays vibrant for everyone. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong stance against federal immigration enforcement, specifically their 'NO ICE!' position, which directly protects vulnerable communities from harmful government overreach. This is important for racial justice and ensuring our community members can live without fear of unjust targeting. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Michael Sugar highest because his platform directly addresses systemic inequities and environmental justice, which are crucial for true community well-being. His commitment to protecting reproductive rights, defending voting rights, and supporting green energy, along with endorsements from the Oregon Working Families Party and the Sierra Club, shows a deep alignment with extreme progressive values. This focus ensures that the most vulnerable in our community are protected and that we move towards a sustainable future, which is the most important value for me. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because their plan directly supports working people by promoting unions and career training programs, which helps us get better jobs and wages. The promise of no new tolls is also a big deal for my daily commute to work, saving me real money. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because their policy to protect reproductive freedom directly supports bodily autonomy, a fundamental value for any rational individual. Their stance against political extremism also aligns with the need for evidence-based governance, free from dogmatic influence. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because as a Democrat in Oregon, Michael Sugar's platform does not prioritize gun rights and his party generally supports stricter gun control. His campaign focuses on other rights, implying he would likely support policies that restrict our ability to own firearms for self-defense. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because, while he is against tolls which is a good thing for our commutes, his strong support from unions and environmental groups like the Sierra Club makes me worry about higher taxes and more government programs that can restrict how we use our land and raise our utility bills. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because his explicit policy to protect reproductive rights is concerning for parents, as it may imply support for minors making significant healthcare decisions without parental involvement. This directly conflicts with the vital importance of parental control over their children's well-being and upbringing. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform promotes significant state investment in areas like small businesses, housing, and green energy, and he supports unions. These policies expand government spending and intervention in the economy, which contradicts the Libertarian principle of limited government and individual economic autonomy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because he clearly states that 'Health care should be a right' and promises to fight for quality, affordable health care, especially for seniors and children. This directly aligns with my belief that everyone deserves accessible healthcare, and his endorsements from labor groups suggest a commitment to public welfare. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because, also as a Democrat, their stated priorities focus on state investment in infrastructure and housing. While these are important, they typically require significant state funding, which often translates to a need for continued or increased tax revenue. This goes against my core value of reducing the tax burden on residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because he explicitly states a commitment to protect 'reproductive freedom,' which directly contradicts the fundamental Catholic belief in the sanctity of all human life from conception to natural death. This stance is gravely opposed to the most crucial moral value, making him unsuitable for public office from a Catholic perspective. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because his platform mentions standing up to 'political extremism' and protecting rights, which is a general positive for community well-being. However, without specific commitments to combating antisemitism or supporting Israel, it doesn't directly address the most pressing concerns of our community with the urgency I would prefer. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his focus on 'growing Oregon's economy from the middle out, not the top down,' and supporting unions and community colleges, implies policies that may not prioritize capital gains or large corporate interests. This approach could lead to policies that are less beneficial for overall stock market growth and investor returns, which is my most important value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his strong support for policies like reproductive freedom, protecting immigrants from federal overreach, and green energy, while important to some, do not align with my foundational emphasis on traditional values and Dharma. His focus on what he calls 'political extremism' also suggests a stance that may be at odds with conservative viewpoints, making his platform less desirable. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Michael Sugar last because his platform directly opposes fundamental conservative principles, such as his support for 'no ICE' and 'reproductive freedom.' His endorsements from various progressive groups and his focus on 'protecting immigrants & Oregonians from federal overreach' clearly demonstrate a commitment to policies that undermine national sovereignty and traditional values, which I find unacceptable. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because while he mentions ensuring 'safety and justice' and 'protecting survivors of abuse,' his approach seems to lean more towards community-based responses for mental health and addiction. While these are important, they may not directly address the immediate and extreme need for tough-on-crime policies that I prioritize. My concern is that a focus on root causes without a strong stance on immediate law enforcement could leave our streets less safe. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his strong and clear commitment to protecting reproductive freedom and defending voting rights, which are fundamental to a just society. His platform also champions green energy and supports unions, showing he truly values both environmental protection and economic justice for working families. These are critical issues for our community, and his endorsements from groups like the Oregon Working Families Party and the Sierra Club show he's serious about these progressive values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite his support for small businesses and safe communities, his policy focus on 'middle out' economics and endorsements from unions suggest a different approach to economic prosperity that may lead to more regulations or taxes. Our community needs clear, decisive action to foster unburdened business growth and a stronger stance on law and order. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Michael Sugar highest because he strongly champions universal access to affordable healthcare and well-funded schools, which are fundamental to human dignity and allow everyone to reach their full potential. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Michael Sugar high because he explicitly states his commitment to protecting reproductive rights, a core value for gender equality. His campaign platform directly pledges to defend these freedoms, ensuring that voters retain control over their healthcare decisions. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his promise of 'NO TOLLS' is a huge relief for everyone dealing with daily commutes and rising costs. He also talks about tackling homelessness and the cost of living, which are major problems, and his support for local businesses is good, but I'm looking for more decisive, less collaborative solutions to our urgent public safety issues. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear commitment to strengthening unions and building an economy that works for working families. Their policy of growing the economy from the 'middle out, not the top down' directly benefits service workers, ensuring fair wages and better working conditions, which is crucial for survival in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Michael Sugar highest because his platform directly addresses the need for comprehensive support for our communities, which is incredibly important for a thriving Portland. He explicitly commits to protecting reproductive freedom and champions green energy to lower utility costs and protect our environment, showing a clear vision for a progressive and sustainable Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform focuses heavily on making Oregon 'affordable' through 'housing people can afford' and 'good jobs.' While these goals sound good, the common policies to achieve them often involve increased state spending and interventions, which can fuel inflation. His association with the Oregon Working Families Party further suggests support for policies that could expand government programs and potentially lead to higher costs for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because their platform strongly advocates for affordable housing, well-funded public schools, and protecting reproductive and voting rights, which are crucial for a thriving, equitable community in Portland. Their explicit stance on 'NO TOLLS, NO ICE' is essential for ensuring accessibility and social justice for all residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because his plan to get more affordable housing for working families would really help me. He wants housing options that people like me can actually afford, and he talks about making the economy better from the bottom up, not just for rich people. That focus on regular folks means a lot to me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because of his focus on well-funded schools and career training programs. While public safety and fiscal strength are my top priorities, ensuring our children have strong educational paths and practical skills for good jobs is also a deeply held value for a thriving community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because while he supports good jobs and housing affordability, his focus on 'growing Oregon's economy from the middle out, not the top down' and endorsements from unions and the Working Families Party, suggest policies that could increase taxes or regulations on businesses and high-income earners. I prefer policies that incentivize broader economic growth for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy on green energy and environmental protection. This shows a clear commitment to fighting climate change, which is important for our city's future and global health, making environmental stewardship the most critical value to secure our collective well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Michael Sugar highest because he is a staunch defender of our environment and climate, which is vital for Oregon's future. His commitment to green energy and an endorsement from the Sierra Club shows he understands the urgent need to protect our precious natural resources. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy to "protect reproductive freedom" directly goes against the sacred value of life and family as ordained by God. This undermines the foundation of our society and goes against divine law. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his policy to implement "NO TOLLS" means he understands the burden of rising costs on old residents like me who just want to get around without paying extra. Affordability is a crucial value, and he will fight to keep our hard-earned money in our pockets. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because while he talks about safe communities and supporting small businesses, his overall platform seems to lean on broader public systems and defending rights, which doesn't directly address the immediate concerns about crime and fiscal responsibility as strongly as I'd like. However, his opposition to tolls is a good point for working families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy commitment to green energy and environmental stewardship, which is crucial for the health of our planet and future generations. Their support for green energy to lower utility costs directly helps our community while protecting our natural resources, aligning with the core Green Party value of ecological wisdom. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because his strong stance against highway tolls is a huge relief for us commuters. Preventing new tolls on our roads protects our daily budgets and keeps our community accessible, which is an important value for suburban families trying to make ends meet. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear policy to protect our immigrant families and ensure everyone has a home they can afford. He stands strong against federal overreach like ICE, which is crucial for our community's safety and peace of mind here in Portland. He also fights for housing options for working families, which means we can actually stay in our homes and not be pushed out. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his support for policies like green energy and strong unions represents an expansion of government influence and special interests, which undermines individual liberty. I believe in free markets and less government interference, allowing people to make their own choices without state mandates. (0 votes)
#3
Adam Baker

Reason I rank this candidate high because his history as a retired police officer shows he knows how to tackle the exploding violence and property crimes that are ruining our city, directly impacting our sense of security. Public safety is the most important value, and he will bring common-sense law and order back to our streets. (6 votes)

Reason I rank Adam Baker low because his platform prioritizes law enforcement and 'common-sense leadership,' while also explicitly aiming to 'push back against radical ideologies.' This approach often translates into policies that disproportionately harm marginalized communities and dismiss progressive efforts for social and racial justice. The focus on increased policing and opposition to progressive ideas directly conflicts with my core values of systemic reform and equity, which are vital for a truly inclusive society. (8 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his background as a retired police officer, which means he truly understands how to tackle the exploding violence and property crimes spilling over from Portland into our communities. Public safety is the most important value for my family and neighbors, and his focus on bringing local control back to us will ensure our streets are safe. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his stated commitment to "pushing back against radical ideologies", which I see as a necessary defense against corrupting influences on our youth and society. This strengthens our community by maintaining upright principles. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Adam Baker low because as a Republican candidate, his campaign platform does not prioritize or explicitly support gender rights or reproductive freedom. This lack of clear commitment indicates he may not champion policies crucial for protecting fundamental bodily autonomy for voters. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because he talks about creating family-wage jobs and affordable housing, which are important. His background as a police officer is good for making our streets safer, but I worry about 'reducing regulatory burdens' if it means less protection for workers like me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate third because he talks about lowering housing costs and dealing with homelessness. These are big problems for me and my neighbors. While he wants to help, his ideas about less government rules for businesses might not help me directly get a better job or more affordable rent. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he emphasizes economic growth through supporting small businesses and reducing regulatory burdens. Reducing regulations is a key factor for corporate profitability and can lead to a more favorable investment climate, which is very important for the stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because as a retired police officer, their background raises concerns about maintaining a system that has historically harmed Black communities, especially with their talk of 'pushing back against radical ideologies'. We need leaders who challenge the status quo, not uphold it. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their stated goal to 'balance some of the radical legislation that has been passed in recent years' is a red flag. This vague language often signals an intent to roll back progressive, secular advancements, which is a detriment to individual liberties and science-informed policy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he strongly advocates for public safety and pushing back against "radical ideologies." As a former police officer, his commitment to curbing crime and government overreach directly aligns with my belief in moral order and personal liberty, which are vital for a righteous society to thrive. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he champions safety and pushes back against radical ideologies, which is critical for protecting our community's moral fabric. His commitment to common-sense leadership supports the foundational Catholic value of social order and the defense of traditional family values against harmful influences. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy focus on economic growth and reducing regulatory burdens directly supports a favorable business environment, which is crucial for my investments and overall financial well-being. His emphasis on public safety, backed by his police officer background, also appeals to the value of a secure community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Adam Baker highest because he is a retired police officer who explicitly focuses on stopping the exploding violence and property crimes spilling over from Portland into our communities. This emphasis on law and order and community safety is crucial for protecting our citizens and their property, which is a foundational role of government. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he advocates for reducing regulatory burdens on small businesses and pushing back against 'radical ideologies' that can lead to government overreach. This policy supports economic liberty and limits government interference, which benefits individuals and entrepreneurs in our community by fostering a freer market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because, while a Republican, his past statements show a clear lack of commitment to strong immigration enforcement. In 2016, he said building a wall was 'at odds with who we are' and supported guest worker programs that included a path to citizenship, which undermines the importance of secure borders and legal immigration processes. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite his background as an orthopedic surgeon, his campaign platform for State House District 40 does not include any specific policies or statements regarding healthcare access or affordability. As a single-issue healthcare voter, a candidate's silence on this critical issue is a major concern for the health of Portland's community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because their platform focuses on economic strength and reducing regulatory burdens. While not a direct tax cut promise, these goals generally lead to a more favorable tax environment for residents and businesses. Less regulation can mean less cost to businesses, which can indirectly lead to lower prices and less pressure for local tax increases. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear policy to support parents in education, which directly protects the fundamental right of parents to guide their children's upbringing. His stance against government overreach in schools, and his support for school choice and opposition to Critical Race Theory, ensures parents have primary authority over what their children learn. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while they mention 'affordable and MORE housing' and 'family-wage jobs,' their platform emphasizes 'reducing regulatory burdens' and has a background as a retired police officer. For service workers, less regulation often means fewer protections, and a focus on 'common-sense leadership' can sometimes overlook the systemic struggles of the working class. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because as a Republican and former police officer, Adam Baker is a strong supporter of our Second Amendment rights. His focus on safety and common-sense leadership, alongside endorsements from Republican leaders who actively oppose gun control, shows he understands the importance of self-defense and will fight against policies that disarm law-abiding citizens. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Republican, his platform does not mention protecting abortion access. The Oregon Republican Party platform stands 'for Life' and emphasizes medical providers' right to refuse care based on conscience, which directly threatens comprehensive abortion services. This stance undermines bodily autonomy and reproductive freedom, which are essential values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their emphasis on reducing regulatory burdens and their background as a retired police officer raise concerns for our progressive Green Party values. Reducing regulations often harms environmental protections and worker rights, and a focus on traditional policing over community-led solutions does not align with our vision for social justice and nonviolence. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his campaign explicitly states a goal of 'pushing back against radical ideologies.' This phrase is a clear attack on progressive values and the efforts to create a more equitable and inclusive Oregon. As a former police officer advocating for 'reducing regulatory burdens,' his priorities seem to conflict directly with the protections needed for our environment, workers, and vulnerable communities. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear stance against excessive government spending and his commitment to lower taxes, which directly combats inflation. He notes that Oregon's state government budget has grown significantly more than its population, suggesting a link between spending and economic problems. Lowering taxes and reducing regulatory burdens can help ease the burden on families and businesses, which is crucial for controlling rising prices. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong stance on community safety and economic prosperity, which are vital for families and businesses in Portland. As a retired police officer, his commitment to tackling 'exploding violence and property crimes' and reducing regulatory burdens for small businesses shows he understands how to create a secure and thriving environment for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their policy emphasis on 'reducing regulatory burdens' for economic growth. This often undermines essential environmental protections and could negatively impact workers' rights, which are critical values for a sustainable and fair economy in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Adam Baker lower because while he advocates for affordable housing, his broader emphasis on reducing regulatory burdens may conflict with necessary protections for workers and the environment, which are vital for collective human flourishing. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his background as a retired police officer directly addresses the critical need for public safety and order in our communities. His commitment to 'driving down homelessness' and pushing back against 'radical ideologies' shows he's ready to take decisive action to fix Portland's most pressing problems, which is exactly what we need right now. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Adam Baker last because his emphasis on combating crime and 'pushing back against radical ideologies' suggests a punitive approach that often harms marginalized communities. This rhetoric is completely at odds with Portland's commitment to social justice and inclusive community building. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate third because of his strong focus on public safety and reducing crime in our communities. As a former police officer, his experience tackling 'exploding violence and property crimes' gives me hope that he can bring back a sense of security to our neighborhoods, which is vital for everyone's well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because, while he mentions affordable housing and strong schools, his primary focus as a retired police officer on 'safety' and 'economic strength' through reducing regulatory burdens doesn't fully align with the deep social justice and environmental reforms needed in our city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he wants to cut down on unnecessary government rules and push back against radical ideas that don't make sense for our way of life. This ensures our communities stay safe and our small businesses can thrive without excessive government meddling, which is vital for our independence. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his background as a retired police officer and his focus on public safety and combating 'radical ideologies' is vital for protecting our community. This commitment to security directly addresses the critical need to fight antisemitism and ensure the safety of our homes and institutions. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a retired police officer, their primary focus on 'safety' and 'reducing regulatory burdens' doesn't align with my priorities. We need smart growth and support for our diverse communities, not just less oversight. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his focus on public safety, which is paramount for our community. His history as a retired police officer shows he understands the challenges of crime and homelessness, and this commitment to keeping our neighborhoods safe is the most important value for me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his background as a police officer shows he truly cares about public safety, which is paramount right now in Portland. We need real law and order to clean up our streets, and his focus on common-sense leadership and reducing regulations will help bring back economic strength. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a retired police officer, their campaign emphasizes public safety and pushing back against 'radical ideologies.' This approach suggests a focus on traditional law enforcement methods and a resistance to progressive social changes, which does not address the root causes of urban issues like homelessness and inequality, making progressive social reform and equity a fundamental value for our city's advancement. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Adam Baker lowest because his emphasis on "crime spillover from Portland" and "curbing government overreach" goes against the collaborative and progressive spirit we need. We must focus on systemic solutions, not just policing, and protect our communities from harmful regulations that could weaken environmental protections. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy on public safety and common-sense leadership directly addresses the rising crime that worries us all. As a retired police officer, he understands how to keep our communities safe and stop the 'spillover of crime' from Portland, which is a top priority for protecting our way of life. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because his background as a police officer and his talk about 'crime from Portland' and 'balancing radical legislation' feels like an attack on our community and our fight for justice. We need leaders who understand the root causes of problems and support our efforts for social change, not those who want to push back against progress and focus only on law and order without addressing inequality. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his focus on public safety and curbing government overreach aligns with my desire for real solutions to crime in our communities. As a retired police officer, he understands the importance of strong law enforcement, which is crucial for protecting individual liberty from chaos. (0 votes)
#4
Sue Leslie

Reason I rank this candidate worst because their stance on Oregon's land use system is that it's 'out of balance' and has 'left landowners and homebuilders out in the cold.' This perspective suggests weakening vital land-use protections that prevent sprawl and protect natural areas, which would harm our urban environment and sustainable growth, thus undermining responsible land use and urban planning, a critical value for Portland's future. (7 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her clear policy to repeal Measure 110 is exactly the kind of bold action needed to restore sanity and public order. Her focus on economic opportunities and eliminating burdensome zoning regulations to create more affordable housing shows she understands how to bring back prosperity and tackle the cost of living, which is vital for families and businesses. (4 votes)

Reason I rank Sue Leslie second because she is a Republican committed to restoring economic opportunities and auditing state spending. Her focus on eliminating wasted taxpayer money on 'pet projects' and her support for no property taxes for senior citizens align with my core value of fiscal responsibility and reducing the tax burden on our hard-working citizens. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate worst because their focus on fixing the 'land use system' for 'landowners and homebuilders' does not address the urgent need for equitable housing that prevents displacement and gentrification. This approach prioritizes profit over community stability and affordable homes for those most in need. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her policy to eliminate zoning requirements directly supports our private property rights, which is the most important value for rural residents who want to use their land without government interference. This removes burdens on hardworking folks who just want to make a living on their own property. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear policy to eliminate property taxes for senior citizens. This directly reduces the tax burden on a significant portion of our community, keeping more money in the pockets of long-time residents. Reducing taxes is the most important value for me, and this policy is a direct step towards that goal. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her clear dedication to restoring Oregon's economic opportunities and creating a supportive environment for businesses. Her focus on fiscal responsibility, including auditing state spending and reviewing land use policies, will help reduce burdens on hardworking families and promote financial stability for our community. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Sue Leslie last because her platform focuses on restoring 'economic opportunities and prosperity' and addressing 'rising costs, high taxes' without any clear commitment to social justice, environmental protection, or equitable systemic change. This emphasis on traditional economic growth often overlooks the needs of diverse communities and can lead to policies that exacerbate inequality and environmental degradation. Her general Republican platform does not align with the urgent progressive need for transformative action on climate and social equity. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because, as a Republican, there is no indication from her campaign materials that she supports abortion access. The Oregon Republican Party platform promotes 'Natural Rights' and conscience protections for medical providers, which are often used to justify restricting abortion. This position is against the fundamental right to choose, limiting critical healthcare options for individuals. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her campaign platform primarily emphasizes economic opportunities and prosperity without addressing climate change, indicating a lack of priority for the most critical environmental challenges facing Oregonians. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her strong ties to the Republican Party and support for former President Trump show a commitment to traditional values that are important for protecting our families and upholding moral order in society. This is crucial for a stable and God-fearing community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because her promise to repeal Measure 110 and eliminate zoning requirements is exactly what we need to restore sanity and protect our property rights. This will help us fight back against the chaos and stop the government from telling us what we can do with our land. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her strong alignment with the Republican Party and her role as an alternate delegate to the 2024 Republican National Convention, pledged to support former President Trump, signals a commitment to a pro-Israel stance, which is a paramount value for the safety and security of our people. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because she champions restoring Oregon's economic opportunities and prosperity. Her focus on principled leadership and easing the burden of rising costs and high taxes reflects the biblical principle of wise stewardship and ensuring families can prosper without undue government interference. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her campaign platform focuses entirely on economic opportunities and prosperity, with no mention of healthcare policies or plans. For residents of Portland, ensuring quality, affordable healthcare is paramount, and a candidate who does not address this issue cannot adequately represent our needs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because as a Republican, Sue Leslie is expected to uphold the Second Amendment and oppose new gun control measures. The Republican party in Oregon has consistently voted against stricter gun laws, and her alignment with the party is crucial for protecting our right to bear arms from further infringement. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she is a Republican, and typically Republicans support stronger border security and immigration enforcement, which is the most important value for protecting our community and state resources. Without explicit statements to the contrary, her party affiliation signals a commitment to controlling illegal immigration. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her platform directly focuses on restoring economic opportunities and creating a supportive environment for businesses to grow and thrive. This is crucial for strong corporate earnings and a healthy stock market, which is my most important value. Her concern about 'high taxes' also suggests a potential for policies that would benefit investors. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her campaign information does not provide specific policies or statements regarding parental control, education, or children's issues, making it impossible to determine her alignment with my most important value. Her general platform on economic prosperity and community empowerment does not address the critical need for protecting parental rights. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because of her commitment to restoring Oregon's economic prosperity and her focus on responsible fiscal management, which aligns with Artha, the pursuit of righteous prosperity. She seeks to address issues like the state budget being wasted and believes the land use system is out of balance, which shows a dedication to sensible policies for economic stability for our families and community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because of their policy stance that 'Oregon's unique land use system is out of balance' and needs to favor landowners and homebuilders. This approach risks eroding smart growth policies and environmental safeguards, which are vital for protecting Oregon's natural beauty and preventing urban sprawl. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Sue Leslie lowest because her platform primarily focuses on economic prosperity and tax cuts for seniors, without explicitly prioritizing comprehensive social safety nets or robust environmental protection, which are essential for the well-being of all people and future generations. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Sue Leslie lowest because her Republican platform lacks any stated commitment to gender rights or reproductive healthcare, which is a critical omission for ensuring bodily autonomy. Her focus on economic issues does not address the vital need for protecting these freedoms for voters. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because their platform is too vague, focusing on 'restoring Oregon's economic opportunities and prosperity' and a 'supportive environment for businesses to grow and thrive.' This language often translates to policies that favor big corporations over the needs of service workers, and there's no clear commitment to specific protections or benefits for working-class people, which is essential for my community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her campaign's stated focus is primarily on 'Restoring Prosperity, Empowering Communities' and 'economic opportunities and prosperity.' There is no clear mention of specific policies or a strong stance on addressing crime or public safety, which is my main concern. Without a direct and strong commitment to combating crime, I do not believe she prioritizes the safety that is most important to Portland residents right now. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Sue Leslie low because her focus on 'getting government out of the way' and reducing regulatory burdens undermines the collective action needed to protect our environment and support social programs. Her stance on repealing Measure 110 goes against the progressive values of our community that prioritize public health and harm reduction. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because her platform emphasizes 'restoring Oregon's economic opportunities and prosperity.' While less specific on direct inflation-fighting policies than other candidates, her general focus on economic health, as a Republican, typically aligns with principles of fiscal responsibility and less government interference. This approach is important for preventing policies that could worsen inflation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because her focus on restoring economic opportunities through principled leadership reflects the Catholic principle of subsidiarity and promoting human dignity through stable work. Her stance supports the well-being of families and communities by fostering a sound economy, which is a vital component of a flourishing society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate fourth because while she talks about restoring economic prosperity and addressing rising costs, her plans seem less specific on how she will directly help families like mine with high taxes and everyday expenses. I need clearer policies that show how my household budget will directly benefit. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform emphasizes being 'tough on crime' and focusing on 'government spending' and 'economic opportunities,' which often means cutting vital social programs and failing to address the root causes of inequality and environmental issues important to Portland residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform emphasizes restoring economic opportunities and criticizes Oregon's land use system for leaving 'landowners and homebuilders out in the cold.' While I understand concerns about housing, this perspective often prioritizes development over environmental protection and equitable community planning, which are critical values for our city. Her focus on an audit of laws suggests a desire to roll back regulations that may protect our environment and workers. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her strong stance on fiscal responsibility and tax relief, particularly for seniors. This aligns with my value of careful budgeting and ensuring that long-standing residents are not overburdened, which is crucial for economic stability in our area. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her platform prioritizes restoring economic opportunities and prosperity for Oregon, which aligns with my interest in a robust economy. Her background as a business owner and real estate agent suggests an understanding of the challenges faced by entrepreneurs and property owners. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Sue Leslie low because her platform focuses on traditional economic growth and less on the critical social and environmental issues facing our district. We need leaders who prioritize people and the planet over just business, and her stance seems to miss that mark. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because their platform is too vague, focusing on generic phrases like 'principled leadership' and 'restoring economic opportunities.' Without specific, secular policy proposals, it's impossible to gauge their commitment to reason-based governance, which is essential for our community's progress. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her strength in advocating for economic opportunities and supporting small businesses is valuable for getting Portland back on its feet, helping our community thrive. Economic stability is important, and she seems like she'll fight for local jobs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform talks about restoring economic opportunities, but it doesn't offer enough specifics on how that would help manual workers like me directly. I need clear plans for jobs or better working conditions, not just general statements about prosperity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her focus on restoring economic opportunities and auditing state spending aligns with the need for financial stability and accountability. Her concern that Oregon's land use system has left landowners and homebuilders out in the cold shows she cares about practical solutions for our community and responsible growth. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because their platform is vague, focusing broadly on 'restoring prosperity' and 'empowering communities' without specific commitments to environmental protection or social justice. This lack of detail, combined with a focus on creating a 'supportive environment for businesses,' suggests a prioritization of economic growth over ecological sustainability and equity, which directly contradicts core Green Party principles. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highly because as a small business owner and real estate agent, she clearly gets what it takes to boost our local economy and protect our property values. Economic prosperity is crucial for our suburban area, and her dedication to restoring opportunities means our investments in homes and businesses will thrive. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform talks a lot about 'economic opportunities and prosperity' but doesn't say how she will actually help our families with the high cost of living in Portland. We need specific actions on housing, wages, and social justice, not just general promises that often don't reach our community. Her focus feels too vague to address our urgent needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because her commitment to getting government out of the way of job creation and reducing taxes is essential for economic freedom. She believes in cutting back on regulations, which means more opportunity for individuals and businesses, leading to real prosperity for Oregonians. (0 votes)

State House District 41

#1
Mark Gamba

Reason I rank Mark Gamba as the best candidate because his history shows a real commitment to fighting climate change and tackling our housing crisis, which are huge deals here in Portland. He pushed for one of the toughest climate action plans in Oregon when he was mayor of Milwaukie, and he helped bring in hundreds of affordable housing units. That kind of proven action for environmental protection and accessible housing is exactly what we need to keep our city livable and sustainable for everyone. These are core values for Portland, and he delivers on them. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their consistent support for higher taxes and their dismissive attitude towards tax-wary voters. They have stated that voters who oppose tax hikes act like 'petulant children' and have supported bills that would make it easier for local governments to raise gas taxes without voter approval. Their push to reform the 'kicker' rebate, arguing it 'bleeds state programs dry' and goes to 'folks who need it least,' demonstrates a clear intent to increase the tax burden on Oregonians, which directly opposes my value of fiscal conservatism. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his clear commitment to making sure people can afford to live here. He is working on a 'Housable Minimum Wage' bill that would tie the minimum wage to the cost of a one-bedroom apartment, which is a crucial step to ensuring workers can actually afford rent in Portland. Being able to afford a home is the most important thing for survival and dignity. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy work directly protects our immigrant community, which is a core value for me. He introduced bills to stop federal immigration authorities from coming into schools without a warrant and to prevent immigration status from being used against people in court. This protects our most vulnerable neighbors. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his actions as a Democratic State Representative align directly with protecting and expanding gender rights. He is connected to legislative efforts, like HB 2002, that strengthen reproductive healthcare access and increase gender-affirming care, which is crucial for ensuring full bodily autonomy for all Oregonians. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his history as Mayor of Milwaukie shows a strong commitment to immediate climate action, which is vital for protecting our planet. He led Milwaukie to be the first city in Oregon to declare a climate emergency and set ambitious goals like becoming carbon neutral by 2045, directly benefiting Portland residents by promoting a regional shift towards sustainability. This demonstrates a deep understanding of the urgency of climate change. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his strong progressive policy agenda, typical of a Democrat in Oregon, directly conflicts with foundational values, especially the sanctity of life. His support for extensive government programs and policies, while sometimes framed as social justice, often leads to mandates and funding that include access to abortion, which is an grave offense against human life. This approach undermines the moral fabric of our community and the protection of the most vulnerable. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because their policy positions suggest an increase in taxes and regulations, which can harm the stock market. For instance, Gamba supports reforming the 'kicker' tax rebate to keep more money for the state instead of returning it to taxpayers, and he wants to disconnect from federal tax codes to prevent 'tax giveaways for corporations and the ultra-wealthy.' These actions can reduce corporate profits and decrease investor returns, hurting overall stock market performance. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his policy history shows strong support for massive government funding of K-12 public education, which goes against the sacred role of parents as the primary educators. This expands state control and diminishes family responsibility, a critical value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his clear support for universal healthcare, which is the most important value for ensuring all Oregonians have access to the care they need. His policy directly impacts voters by striving for a system where healthcare is a right, not a privilege, reducing financial burdens on families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his history shows he supports policies that could increase costs and lead to more government spending. He voted for a bill that increases fees on utility bills for energy assistance, which critics say boosts energy costs. Higher energy costs directly contribute to inflation, hurting our budgets. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his strong commitment to science-based climate action directly addresses existential threats, reflecting a rational approach to public welfare. Milwaukie, under his mayoral leadership, adopted one of the most aggressive climate action plans in the state, aiming for carbon neutrality by 2045. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his efforts in affordable housing are good for promoting stability, his primary focus on aggressive climate action, aiming for carbon neutrality by 2045, prioritizes environmental mandates over the immediate economic well-being and traditional livelihoods crucial for our community's prosperity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because his consistent and strong advocacy for climate action directly supports the well-being of all humanity and our planet. As Mayor of Milwaukie, he helped create a Climate Action Plan and declared a climate emergency, demonstrating a commitment to protecting our shared future, which is a fundamental humanist value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his policies actively work against strong immigration control, which directly impacts our community's resources and safety. He supports using state funds, like the $7 million in Governor Kotek's budget, to provide legal aid and navigation services to immigrants facing deportation, actively hindering federal enforcement. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their strong history of climate action, the positive effect on environmental protection, and the importance of a habitable planet. As Milwaukie's mayor, Mark Gamba led the creation of one of Oregon's most aggressive climate action plans and declared a climate emergency, aiming for the city to be carbon neutral by 2045. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Mark Gamba highest because he has a solid track record as our representative, especially on affordable housing. He's working on new ways to get thousands of affordable homes built, which is crucial for keeping Portland a place where everyone can afford to live, not just the wealthy. He also champions climate action, a value that's become increasingly important to our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because of his strong commitment to addressing the housing crisis, especially his plan to build thousands of new affordable homes for working families through public-private partnerships. This directly combats the gentrification that is pushing Black families out of Portland, prioritizing economic justice and the ability for our community to stay in our homes. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Mark Gamba in the middle because while his environmental initiatives are commendable for maintaining Portland's desirability, his strong focus on addressing wealth inequality and increasing minimum wage could lead to policies that impact my personal finances through higher taxes or increased operational costs for businesses. Economic stability is paramount, and these policies could create uncertainty. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while he addresses important issues like housing affordability, his approach to wealth inequality and extensive climate action policies might lead to increased government intervention and costs, which is a concern for financial prudence. His vote against recriminalizing drugs is also troubling, as public safety and a strong rule of law are paramount for a stable community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Mark Gamba highest because his record clearly shows a deep commitment to climate action, which is paramount for our city's future. As Mayor of Milwaukie, he helped create one of Oregon's strongest climate action plans, setting aggressive goals like carbon neutrality by 2050. This direct action proves he will fight for the environmental policies Portland desperately needs to protect our planet and improve urban living. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his deep commitment to aggressive climate action, like championing one of the state's strongest climate action plans as Milwaukie mayor, might bring increased costs and regulations to our neighborhoods. While environmental health is important, my most important value is financial prudence, and I worry about policies that could raise our utility bills or property costs without enough consideration for economic impact. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent and aggressive policy history on climate action, which is extremely important for our future in Oregon. As Mayor of Milwaukie, he pushed for one of the state's most ambitious climate action plans, aiming for carbon neutrality by 2045, which shows a clear commitment to protecting our planet for future generations. This bold action directly benefits all residents by ensuring a livable environment, a value I consider paramount. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because while his dedication to addressing the housing crisis and wealth inequality is commendable, his primary focus on climate action, though important, doesn't directly address the immediate and pressing concerns of community security or explicit support for the Jewish community's specific needs in Portland. A strong sense of community safety and protection against antisemitism are paramount, and his platform does not clearly articulate how he would prioritize these values from an 'extreme' perspective. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his strong push for affordable housing and a living wage. He wants to 'kickstart a massive boom in affordable housing construction intended for homeownership' and ties the minimum wage to the cost of renting, noting Portland's livable wage is nearly $30 an hour. This shows a commitment to ensuring working families can afford to live and thrive, which is vital for economic justice and community well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong record on climate action, which is incredibly important for our future. As Mayor of Milwaukie, he helped create one of the state's most aggressive climate action plans and declared a climate emergency, showing a real commitment to environmental sustainability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because, while he co-sponsored a bill creating the crime of aggravated felon in possession of a firearm, which is good for public safety, he also supported HB 4138, which requires police to wear specific identification and generally prohibits masks. This policy could make officers less safe and hinder their ability to do their job, which is a major concern for keeping our neighborhoods secure. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong record on climate action, which is the most critical issue facing our planet and our community in Portland. He led Milwaukie to create one of the most aggressive climate action plans in Oregon, aiming for carbon neutrality by 2045, showing real leadership and a commitment to protecting our future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy on housing and wages directly helps working families afford life in Portland, which is incredibly important to me. He is pushing for a 'Housable Minimum Wage' that would tie the minimum wage to the cost of renting a one-bedroom apartment, making sure people working full-time aren't struggling to pay for a place to live. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his progressive policies are a threat to our economy and individual liberties. He actively champions 'real climate action' and 'rebalancing wealth inequality,' which means more taxes, more regulation, and more government control over our lives and businesses, undermining economic freedom. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Mark Gamba first because his dedication to aggressive climate action and affordable housing directly impacts my future in Portland. His leadership in passing a strong climate action plan and a $15 per hour minimum wage as mayor of Milwaukie shows he prioritizes creating a sustainable and equitable city, which is crucial for students like me facing rising costs and environmental concerns. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he really cares about affordable housing and renter protections. He's working on a big plan to build thousands of new affordable homes for working families, and that helps people like me find a place to live. He also pushes for fairer wealth distribution, which is super important because so many problems, like homelessness, come from people not having enough money to get by. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Mark Gamba low because his main focus is on aggressive climate action plans and making Milwaukie carbon neutral. These kinds of policies often lead to more government regulations and higher costs for taxpayers, which harms our ability to make our own choices and manage our land as we see fit. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his unwavering commitment to climate action, a critical value for Portland residents. He has a proven history of implementing aggressive climate plans, like the one in Milwaukie, which shows he will take the environmental crisis seriously and push for real change in the legislature. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Mark Gamba highest because he has a proven history of fighting for aggressive climate action, which is essential for our planet's future. As a former mayor, he created one of Oregon's strongest climate action plans, showing real dedication to protecting our environment for generations to come. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his history of passing one of the strongest climate action plans in Oregon as mayor shows a true commitment to environmental protection, which is essential for our planet and future generations. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his commitment to environmental stewardship and social justice, which are paramount values. His efforts to pass strong climate action plans and advocate for affordable housing directly address the well-being of the community and the preservation of Allah's creation, reflecting a deep sense of responsibility. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he wants to build more affordable homes for working families and protect renters, which is a big deal when housing costs are out of control here in Portland. He also fights against tax breaks for the rich that hurt regular folks like me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because he has experience as a State Representative and focuses on important issues like housing. He has worked to lower the cost of new housing and protect renters, which can help some families. However, his strong focus on aggressive climate action and 'rebalancing wealth inequality' might lead to policies that are too costly or disruptive for our local economy and traditional way of life. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he voted for a bill that gives over $11 billion in public funds to K-12 education, which expands government control over schools. The most important value is parental control, and giving more money to public education reduces parents' power to direct their children's learning and upbringing. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his history shows a strong commitment to real climate action and environmental protection, which is the most important value for our planet's future. As Milwaukie's former mayor, he led the creation of one of the state's most aggressive climate action plans, showing he actively works to secure a habitable future for all, which directly benefits every Oregonian. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because as a Democrat in Oregon, he aligns with the party's clear and strong policy to protect and expand abortion access, which is crucial for reproductive freedom. The Democratic Party of Oregon is actively working to safeguard abortion rights against federal interference and has proposed legislation like the SHARE Act to protect providers and patients. (0 votes)
#2
Priyesh Krishnan

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is a severe lack of information available about their specific policy positions or past actions. As an extreme voter in Portland, it's crucial for me to understand where a candidate stands on vital issues like environmental protection, housing, and social equity. Without clear evidence of their platform or a track record, I cannot confidently support them to represent our district, as an informed vote requires transparency and a defined vision. (12 votes)

Reason I rank Priyesh Krishnan last because there's just no information about what he stands for. How can I vote for someone when I don't know their policies on anything that matters to our community? Transparency and clear positions on issues are absolutely critical for voters like me to make an informed choice, and without that, it's impossible to support him. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because, while running as a Democrat in Oregon generally suggests support for gender rights, there is no specific public information available on their stance regarding reproductive rights or gender-affirming care. My vote depends on clear commitment to these vital issues. (2 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank Priyesh Krishnan second because I could not find clear public information about his policy positions or campaign platform. As a student, it is essential for me to understand a candidate's specific plans on critical issues like climate change, housing, and education before I can confidently support them. Without this transparency, it is hard to know how he would represent the progressive values of Portland. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because he is a Democrat, which typically means he supports gun control. However, I could not find any clear statements from him on gun rights, making his exact stance unknown. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because, as a Democrat in Oregon, his party's platform typically supports policies that contradict the sanctity of life. While specific policy details for him are not widely available, his association with a party that often promotes abortion access makes him a concerning choice. However, without a clear record of his direct actions or detailed proposals, he is less objectionable than a candidate with a known progressive agenda. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because I cannot find enough clear information about their specific plans or policies that would help manual workers like me with housing, jobs, or other important issues. Without knowing what they stand for, it's hard to trust they'll fight for us. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is insufficient public information on his specific policy positions, making it impossible to determine if he would prioritize evidence-based governance and secular principles crucial for a functioning society. No specific policy stances are available. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because there isn't enough public information about their specific plans. While they are a Democrat, I need to see clear stances on things like affordable housing and living wages to know if they truly stand for working people. Without concrete policies, it's hard to fully support them. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available about their stance or actions on crime and public safety. For a voter solely focused on making our city safer, choosing a candidate with an unknown position on this critical issue is too risky, as effective crime reduction is the most important goal. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because there is not enough public information available about their specific policy stances on critical issues like housing affordability, police accountability, or economic equity. Without clear positions, it is impossible to determine how they would truly represent the needs of our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because there is no clear information about their economic policies or views on inflation. They have not completed a candidate survey that would explain their positions. A candidate without a stance on increasing government spending or taxes is less concerning than one who actively supports such measures. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear information on their stance regarding parental control in education or children's upbringing. It is crucial for candidates to explicitly support parental rights, as this is the most important value, and without such a clear position, their commitment to empowering parents over state control is unknown. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because his stance on immigration is unclear, and as a Democrat, there is a significant risk he would support policies that work against immigration control. While he hasn't explicitly stated support for sanctuary policies, the general trend of his party in Oregon is concerning for those who prioritize stricter enforcement. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because there is no clear public information on their healthcare policy stance, which makes it hard to know if they truly support universal, affordable healthcare for all Oregonians. While being a Democrat might suggest alignment, without a specific policy statement, their commitment to this vital issue for voters is unconfirmed. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because his specific policy positions are largely unknown. While he is a Democrat, which typically implies support for increased government programs and regulation in Portland, he has not publicly detailed his platform. This lack of a clear agenda means he has not actively proposed policies that directly infringe on individual liberty, unlike other candidates. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because there is not enough information available on their specific economic policies or stance on business and taxation. As a stock-market voter, I prioritize candidates whose platforms clearly support economic growth and investor confidence. Without clear policies, it is impossible to determine their potential impact on the stock market, making them a neutral choice. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because there is a severe lack of public information regarding his specific policy stances, particularly on issues crucial to our community like safety, economic stability, or any direct engagement with protecting religious freedoms and combating antisemitism. Without a clear understanding of his positions, it is impossible to ascertain his alignment with our core values, making him an unreliable choice for representation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Priyesh Krishnan in the middle. His background as a health economist and data scientist is impressive, suggesting he could bring a fresh, analytical perspective to state issues. He also serves on the Sellwood-Moreland Improvement League board, showing he cares about our local community. However, there's less information about his specific plans for the district compared to the incumbent, making it harder to know exactly how he would tackle the big problems we face. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is not enough specific information about his policy proposals or past actions for me to make an informed decision. While his background as a 'Principal Data Scientist, Health Economist' and involvement with a local improvement league suggest a capacity for public service, the absence of clear stances on critical issues like housing, education, or economic development leaves too much uncertainty. For me, transparency in policy is paramount, and without it, I cannot confidently support a candidate. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, while specific policy details are hard to find right now, they are running as a Democrat, which generally aligns with the progressive values our community cares about, like social justice and environmental protection. This offers a potential new voice for those concerns. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because, while running as a Democrat, there is currently no publicly available information on their specific policy positions or platform. Without a clear understanding of their stances on critical issues like social justice, environmental protection, or economic equality, it is impossible to determine their alignment with humanist values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, as a fellow Democrat, I'd expect some alignment with my values, but there's simply no clear policy information available for me to make an informed decision. In this critical time, it's vital for candidates to clearly state their positions on issues like climate change and social justice, and the lack of that transparency is a concern for voters. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available about his policies or what he stands for. It's really important to me to know a candidate's plans for things like housing or the cost of living before I can support them, and without that, I can't make an informed decision. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because while he is a Democrat, his specific policy stances are not as clearly defined or as aggressively progressive as the incumbent's. Choosing him is a vote against the deeply problematic policies of the current representative, prioritizing a slight reduction in government overreach. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because I couldn't find any information about what he plans to do for housing, jobs, or other things that really matter to people like me. When you don't know what a candidate stands for, it's hard to trust them with your vote. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Priyesh Krishnan last because there is not enough information about his specific policies or what he stands for. When choosing someone to represent us, it's critical to know where they stand on important issues, and without that clarity, it's hard to trust he will look out for our rural interests. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough public information available about his specific policy positions. As a voter, it's crucial to understand a candidate's stance on key issues like climate change, housing, and transportation, and without that transparency, it is impossible to gauge his alignment with the progressive values important to our district. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Priyesh Krishnan in the middle because, as a Democrat, he aligns with our party's general principles, which is a good starting point. However, there is not much public information available about his specific policy stances or progressive track record to fully evaluate his commitment to the bold changes Portland needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is a lack of specific policy information available for his campaign, making it difficult to understand his concrete plans for our community. While his background as a health economist and data scientist suggests an intelligent, data-driven approach, his affiliation with a local improvement league that emphasizes values like 'equity' and 'anti-racism,' without clear economic or educational proposals, does not directly address my most important priorities of fiscal stability and concrete opportunities for advancement. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because there is no clear policy platform available for review, making it impossible to assess their alignment with progressive values. Without specific stances on critical issues like climate, housing, or social justice, I cannot confidently support their candidacy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because there is little clear information available about their specific policy positions, particularly on issues like parental rights and limited government. Without a clear stance, it is difficult to fully trust they will uphold essential community values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Priyesh Krishnan in the middle because, as a Democrat, he likely shares many progressive values important to our community, even if his specific platform details are not widely available. His background as a health economist and involvement with the Sellwood-Moreland Improvement League suggest a data-driven approach to improving local well-being and community life. This focus on evidence and local impact is valuable for addressing complex urban challenges. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low-medium because there is not enough public information about his specific policy goals or past actions to confidently support him, which makes it hard to know if he will truly fight for our progressive Portland values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough public information available about his specific policy stances or past actions. Without a clear understanding of his commitments, it is impossible to determine how well he would uphold the values of justice, community welfare, and moral guidance that are essential for our district. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because there is not enough clear information about their specific policies or how they plan to address the challenges facing our district. A candidate needs to have a well-defined platform for voters to make an informed choice. Without understanding their stances, it is difficult to trust they will represent our traditional values effectively in the State House. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because there is very little public information available about their specific policy stances or past actions. For a Green Party voter, knowing a candidate's detailed commitment to environmental and social justice is crucial, and without that clarity, it is impossible to fully assess their alignment with our values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there's simply not enough information about their specific policy positions. When voting for State House, I need to know exactly how a candidate plans to address issues like housing costs and public safety that directly impact my neighborhood. The most important value is transparency and a clear plan, and without that, it's hard to trust they will represent our interests effectively. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while he is a Democrat, there isn't enough public information about his specific policies to know if he truly champions the issues important to our community. I need to see clear plans for housing, immigrant rights, and economic justice to fully support him. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because, as a Democrat, he is expected to support abortion access, which is vital for maintaining reproductive choice in Oregon. While there are no specific statements from him on abortion in my research, his party affiliation suggests he will uphold existing protections and advocate for women's healthcare. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while they are a Democrat, suggesting some alignment with progressive values, there is no clear policy platform or track record available. Their lack of publicized stances means they haven't shown they are ready to fight for the bold changes Portland needs, which is a major concern for effective representation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because there is little public information available about their specific climate change policies or past actions. While running in the Democratic primary suggests some alignment with climate action, the absence of a clear record or stated priorities makes it impossible to fully assess their dedication to addressing the climate crisis, which is the most critical issue facing Oregon. (0 votes)
#3
Elvis Clark

Reason I rank Elvis Clark last because his focus on reducing regulations and eliminating taxes on private healthcare insurance directly undermines the social safety nets and environmental protections that are crucial for a just and equitable society. This approach would harm vulnerable Oregonians and weaken our collective well-being. (6 votes)

Reason I rank Elvis Clark last because his approach to environmental progress and housing affordability seems less aligned with the urgent and bold actions Portland needs. He suggests supporting hybrid vehicles instead of fully electric ones, which is a step backward for reaching carbon neutrality, a goal that is incredibly important for my generation's future. His focus on expanding outward for housing, rather than prioritizing denser, sustainable urban development, doesn't address the core housing crisis in a way that respects our city's growth boundaries. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong focus on fiscal responsibility and practical solutions. His plan to offer cash refunds for educational programs like tutoring and vocational courses directly supports parental guidance and rewards academic achievement, which is a most important value for ensuring children's success and building a strong future. He also aims to lower utility bills and housing costs through cost-conscious government, which is crucial for family economic stability. (5 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he is a Republican. Republicans generally protect the Second Amendment, which is the most important value for me. He will uphold our right to own guns. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his commitment to making state government more cost-conscious and lowering utility bills is a top priority for my family. The most important value for me is financial responsibility, and his proposals to achieve environmental progress through less costly ways, like supporting hybrids instead of subsidizing all-electric vehicles, makes sense for our pocketbooks. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his policy aims to reduce government involvement in healthcare and eliminate taxes on private insurance, which directly opposes the goal of universal, affordable healthcare. This approach would negatively affect voters by making healthcare less accessible and more reliant on private, profit-driven systems, undermining the value of healthcare as a fundamental right. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he does not explicitly advocate for policies that would hinder immigration enforcement or provide sanctuary to undocumented individuals. While his platform focuses on other issues like reducing costs and housing, his lack of stated opposition to stronger immigration measures makes him the most acceptable option for maintaining control over who resides in our state. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his Republican party affiliation generally upholds the sanctity of life, which is the most fundamental value for voters. Supporting candidates who protect unborn children is crucial for the moral well-being of our society. His focus on reducing government overreach and promoting parental rights in education also aligns with the principle of subsidiarity, empowering families and local communities. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy on housing, which includes loosening land-use laws to allow cities to build outward, goes against the sustainable urban development we need in Portland. This approach could lead to more sprawl and less focus on dense, walkable communities. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Elvis Clark highest because his policy focus on a "cost-conscious" state government and lower utility bills directly benefits high-income residents by potentially reducing our financial burden. This approach values economic efficiency, which is crucial for maintaining a strong personal financial standing. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his clear commitment to reducing government intervention in healthcare and housing. He supports eliminating taxes on private health insurance and liberalizing access to healthcare providers, which strengthens individual freedom and reduces state control over personal choices. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their history of direct involvement in public safety, which shows a commitment to making our communities safer. Serving on the Milwaukie Public Safety Advisory Committee means they understand the real issues affecting us, and public safety is the most important value for our city. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he clearly opposes government actions that drive up costs for regular people. He criticized urban renewal districts for taking property tax money away from basic services and causing utility bills to increase. This helps keep money in our pockets, which is important for fighting inflation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because, as a Republican, he is likely to oppose broad abortion access, which directly threatens reproductive freedom. The Republican Party of Oregon emphasizes principles that could lead to restrictions on abortion rights and opposes government involvement in healthcare decisions in ways that often limit access to care. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his policy proposals for healthcare, which include eliminating taxes on private health insurance and liberalizing access to private healthcare providers, contradict the humanist value of universal and equitable access to healthcare. This approach could exacerbate inequalities and limit access for those most in need. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because he talks about making housing cheaper and lowering utility bills, which is good. He wants to let cities build more homes to bring costs down. But his ideas about cutting taxes on private healthcare and making government more "cost conscious" make me worried he might cut services that help folks who are struggling the most. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his policy of 'eliminating taxes on private health care insurance and other private healthcare services' and his general anti-regulation stance could weaken Oregon's Reproductive Health Equity Act. This Act is essential for ensuring no-cost access to reproductive health and gender-affirming care, making his approach a threat to gender equality. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his policy proposals, such as pushing for 'less costly ways to regulate industry' and 'eliminating taxes on private health care insurance,' signal a harmful approach that would dismantle crucial protections and safety nets. This focus on deregulation and privatization undermines the collective well-being and equitable access to resources that our community desperately needs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their clear stance against excessive regulations, which is crucial for a healthy stock market. Less regulation means businesses face lower operational costs, leading to higher profits and improved investor confidence, which directly benefits stock values. For example, Clark opposes regulations that drive up the cost of insurance and housing, which would save businesses money. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on "cost-conscious" government and market-based solutions for housing and environmental issues goes against the urgent, transformative action needed for social and climate justice. This reflects a dangerous lack of understanding of systemic problems, which is directly opposed to the progressive values that demand bold, public-sector led solutions to protect vulnerable communities and the environment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their policy approach, while mentioning environmental progress, fundamentally prioritizes cost-consciousness and private sector solutions over the urgent, transformative environmental and social justice changes I believe are necessary. For instance, his focus on hybrid vehicles and reducing subsidies for all-electric vehicles, as well as promoting private healthcare, clashes with the collective, comprehensive, and publicly funded solutions that are vital for addressing systemic issues in Portland and ensuring equitable access for all residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his clear focus on empowering families to build wealth through homeownership and his commitment to practical, results-oriented education. He aims to make 'a home and yard within your reach – such homes are great wealth builders for your retirement years,' which is crucial for generational prosperity. This directly supports the core value of economic stability and self-sufficiency for our families, ensuring a strong foundation for the future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Elvis Clark second, but it's a distant second. He talks about being cost-conscious and making homes more affordable by letting cities build more, which could sound good. But his plan to get there, like wanting less costly ways to regulate industries and loosening land-use laws to build outward, doesn't really line up with how we want Portland to grow or protect our environment. Fiscal responsibility is important, but not if it means giving up on our progressive values for smart growth and environmental protection. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his approach to lowering costs by loosening regulations and cutting taxes on private healthcare insurance seems to hurt working people more than help them. We need stronger protections for workers and affordable public services, not less regulation that can favor big business and leave us vulnerable. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his approach to environmental progress is a step backward for Portland. He suggests accepting hybrid vehicles and electric bicycles to save taxpayers from subsidizing all-electric vehicles, which undermines the urgent need for a full transition to zero-emission transportation and prioritizing cost over bold climate action. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he wants to make government more cost-conscious and lower utility bills, which could help with household budgets. He also talks about making housing more affordable by allowing cities to build more, which is a good idea to bring down prices for people trying to find a home. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Elvis Clark highest because he wants to let cities build outwards more, which should help lower housing costs by using less expensive land. This policy values common sense and individual opportunity, as it creates more chances for regular folks to own a home with a yard, which is important for building wealth for our families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because their focus on re-balancing state government to be more fiscally responsible and their proposals for housing affordability by allowing cities to build both outward and inward directly support economic stability and opportunity for families. This approach fosters a stronger, more predictable environment for our community, which is a core value, as stability and economic well-being are essential for the flourishing of Jewish life in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on reducing regulations and questioning subsidies for all-electric vehicles goes against the progressive environmental and urban planning values vital to Portland. His policies would likely hinder efforts to create a greener, more livable city, which deeply concerns me as an office worker relying on forward-thinking urban solutions. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because of their policy to reduce state control over healthcare, which would negatively affect access to comprehensive public health services. Their aim to eliminate taxes on private health insurance and services goes against the fundamental progressive value of strengthening publicly funded universal healthcare. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Elvis Clark last because his policy approach directly conflicts with the urgent needs of our urban environment. His desire to 're-balance state government to be more cost conscious' and reduce regulations suggests a rollback of essential environmental protections and social programs. His stance on expanding housing 'outward' rather than focusing on dense, sustainable urban development is not what our city needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on deregulation and cutting costs for private industry, rather than strengthening public services and bold environmental action, goes against the progressive values that are essential for a fair and sustainable Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while he mentions environmental progress, his proposals lean towards less government intervention and more privatization in areas like healthcare and education, which risks undermining universal access and secular public services. He aims to preserve access to healthcare by eliminating taxes on private health insurance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because his focus on strengthening families through parental guidance in education and promoting homeownership aligns with important community values. While his environmental approach is less comprehensive than others, his emphasis on family stability and financial prudence is commendable for a righteous society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Elvis Clark last. While his focus on being cost-conscious and lowering utility bills is appealing, his ideas on housing, like building outward, don't seem to fit with Portland's need for smart growth and keeping our unique neighborhoods. I worry his approach might not truly address the core issues for our community in the way we've come to expect. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because he talks about lowering utility bills and making housing cheaper by letting cities build more homes, which sounds good for my wallet. He also backs vocational training, which is important for jobs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because his policies prioritize responsible spending and individual opportunity, which are core values for our community. He aims to lower utility bills and reduce costly regulations on businesses, which helps families keep more of their hard-earned money and fosters economic stability. He also champions expanding land use for housing, which is essential for ensuring that young families can afford a home with a yard, building generational wealth and community strength. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy to give families cash refunds for tutors and other educational programs directly empowers parents to choose the best learning path for their children. Parental control over education is the most important value, ensuring that parents, not the government, direct their children's upbringing and academic choices. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their policy positions on environmental protection and social welfare are fundamentally misaligned with the critical needs of our community. For example, advocating for 'less costly ways to regulate industry' for environmental progress, rather than strong, transformative action, is a dangerous approach that undermines our fight against climate change and could worsen the climate crisis for all of us. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his policy to empower parents in their children's education through cash refunds for tutors and vocational training strongly upholds the sacred value of family, ensuring children are raised with strong cultural and moral guidance. This focus on traditional family support is vital for our community's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy proposals to privatize healthcare and education would deeply hurt our working families and those who rely on public services. Access to good schools and affordable healthcare should be a right for everyone, not just those who can pay. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his public statements indicate a focus that may not prioritize aggressive climate action, which is essential for the future of Portland and Oregon. His concern about high utility costs and attributing wildfires to "failed forestry policy" without emphasizing climate change as a root cause suggests a different approach to environmental issues that could delay urgent climate solutions. (0 votes)

State House District 43

#1
Tawna Sanchez

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because of their clear policy to increase taxes on residents. As Co-Chair of Ways and Means, she has actively pushed for a new retail sales tax on beer and wine, starting at 2% in 2026 and rising to 8% by 2032, which directly means more money taken from my pocket. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her platform clearly states that "Climate change is the greatest threat to our future – Oregon must lead the way to a carbon-free future." This direct commitment to a carbon-free future is absolutely essential for the long-term well-being of Portland and aligns with the urgent need for aggressive climate action. (5 votes)

Reason I rank Tawna Sanchez first because she has actually passed laws that help people like me keep a roof over their heads. She pushed for rules that limit how much landlords can raise rent and stop unfair evictions. This helps keep us from becoming homeless, which is the most important thing for stability. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her legislative record clearly shows she supports stricter gun control, which directly attacks our Second Amendment rights. She voted to strengthen Ballot Measure 114, which makes it harder for law-abiding citizens to buy firearms by increasing fees and extending waiting periods. This kind of policy disarms responsible people and does nothing to stop criminals. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because of their consistent legislative record and advocacy for affordable housing, criminal justice reform, and environmental protection, which are crucial for a just and sustainable society. Their long history of working with vulnerable communities, like those served by the Native American Youth and Family Center, shows a deep commitment to compassion and equitable systems. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Tawna Sanchez highest because her consistent work on affordable housing directly addresses the homelessness crisis, which is a critical issue in Portland. Her legislative efforts, like the Emergency Housing Stability and Production Package, show a real commitment to creating more homes and stabilizing rents, which is paramount for community well-being and ensuring everyone has equitable access to shelter in our city. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of her active push for new taxes, specifically an alcohol sales tax. This directly harms individuals by increasing costs on their personal consumption and expands the government's ability to control and extract wealth, undermining economic freedom. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, while she voted against one bill that would have required schools to alert families about federal agents, her overall platform supports strengthening protections for immigrant communities and pushing back against federal immigration enforcement. This goes against my priority of stricter immigration controls. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her implied support for policies like HB 2002 directly undermines parental control, which is the most important value. This bill allows minors, even as young as 10, to receive reproductive and gender-affirming healthcare without parental consent, taking away parents' fundamental right to make decisions for their children. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her consistent legislative history and explicit commitment to environmental protection, including a carbon-free future and reducing pollution. This demonstrates a clear understanding of the ecological crisis, which is our most important value, and her actions directly work towards a healthier planet for all Portland residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because while her focus on housing and social services might help some, her general approach seems to lean toward more government spending and intervention, which often comes with higher taxes that burden us. She also voted to modify Measure 114, which, even if it was a modification, still doesn't fully protect our gun rights, a vital freedom for our way of life. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her legislative actions directly support accessible and affordable healthcare for Portlanders. For example, she co-sponsored a bill to fund the 988 suicide crisis hotline and mobile crisis response network, which is vital for ensuring immediate mental health support in our community. This demonstrates a clear commitment to improving critical public health services. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Tawna Sanchez highest because her long-standing commitment to affordable housing is exactly what our community needs right now. She has actively worked to create more affordable homes for families and elders, which is crucial for keeping Portland diverse and accessible for everyone. This shows she truly values community stability, which is the most important thing for our people to thrive here. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while she is the co-chair of the powerful Ways and Means committee, her policies often lean towards increasing the burden on corporations. For example, her support for closing corporate tax loopholes and eliminating certain tax breaks could reduce corporate profits. This directly impacts the stock market by decreasing the earnings potential of businesses, which is a negative for my investment goals. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because her progressive policies, such as pushing for a higher minimum wage and advocating for increased state-level investments in affordable housing, tend to expand government spending and intervention. While seemingly benevolent, these actions often lead to higher taxes and more regulations, which can harm individual economic freedom and place an undue burden on successful businesses and residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her history shows a strong commitment to practical solutions for Portland's most pressing issues, like housing and behavioral health. This directly impacts our community's stability, which is the most important value for ensuring everyone has a safe place and access to necessary support. She has actively championed legislative efforts, including a $379 million package, to expand affordable housing and improve addiction services. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Tawna Sanchez highest because she has a proven track record in the State House tackling affordable housing and supporting our elders, which are huge concerns for folks who've lived here a long time. She's been a State Representative since 2017 and co-chairs the Joint Ways & Means Committee, showing she knows how to get things done and manage the state's money to protect our social safety net, which is vital for maintaining a stable community for all residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because her consistent progressive record and deep ties to community advocacy, especially through her work co-founding the Native American Youth and Family Center, demonstrate a genuine commitment to empowering marginalized communities. Her legislative efforts in creating affordable housing and supporting tenant rights are vital for addressing the housing crisis that impacts so many in our city, upholding the value of housing as a human right. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because while she works on important issues like affordable housing and education, her approach to criminal justice reform concerns me. She supports continuing efforts to stop racial profiling and reduce the use of force by law enforcement, and notes Measure 110 needs more tools for a trauma-informed response. My priority is immediate action on crime and safety, and I worry her focus on systemic reform might not quickly address the public safety issues directly affecting our neighborhoods. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highly because of their strong and consistent history of advocating for the most vulnerable and marginalized in our community. As a leader, they have fought for the rights of women, indigenous people, and others in need, which deeply aligns with Islamic principles of social justice and charity. Their work at the Native American Youth and Family Center (NAYA) directly provides essential services like affordable housing and support for families and elders, demonstrating a practical commitment to uplifting the poor and oppressed. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Tawna Sanchez first because her commitment to a carbon-free future and reducing air pollution is super important for our planet and our city's health. The climate crisis is real, and we need leaders who actually get it and fight for big changes to protect our future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because as an incumbent, she has been actively involved in passing significant legislation like the Emergency Housing Stability and Production Package and the Oregon Drug Intervention Plan. While the problems are still big, these are concrete steps she's taken to address housing and addiction crises, showing a commitment to finding solutions for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because of their proven history of fighting for affordable housing and worker protections. They have pushed for significant investments in affordable housing, including low-income rentals, and supported tenants' rights, which directly helps people struggling with rent in our city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her policy focuses on youth substance abuse prevention and domestic violence services. While these are important, they are indirect approaches to crime prevention and do not directly address the immediate need for stricter law enforcement and accountability for criminals, which is the most pressing issue for our community's safety. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her history of supporting affordable housing and tenant protections, which are very important for managing living costs in Portland. Her work helps people like me find and keep affordable places to live. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy to restructure the tax system aims to fund public services without increasing the burden on lower-income taxpayers, which typically means increasing taxes on businesses and higher-income individuals. This approach punishes success and drives businesses and wealth out of Oregon, ultimately harming our economy and all citizens. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because of their consistent efforts to make housing more affordable and protect our planet, ensuring that all residents can thrive in a sustainable Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because her extensive work in social services and her dedication to helping vulnerable families reflect the Jewish value of Tikkun Olam, repairing the world. However, her focus on broad progressive social justice issues does not directly address the urgent concerns of rising antisemitism or provide specific reassurance for the safety and security of the Jewish community in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highly because of her consistent focus on affordable housing and economic stability for working families, which is a massive challenge in Portland. Her work as Co-Chair of the Joint Ways & Means Committee shows she can make real budgetary decisions to fund these important initiatives, making our city more equitable for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her dedicated career in social justice and her legislative push for a carbon-free future reflect a deep understanding of our community's urgent needs, emphasizing the vital importance of environmental and social equity in our state. She prioritizes moving Oregon toward a carbon-free future to address climate change. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Tawna Sanchez highest because her legislative record demonstrates a clear commitment to police accountability and protecting marginalized communities. She supported policies that require law enforcement to have identifying information on uniforms and worked to strengthen anti-discrimination protections, which is vital for justice and safety in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because, while she advocates for important community services like affordable housing and behavioral health, her progressive approach might not sufficiently address the urgent need for stricter public order that I prioritize. However, her efforts to strengthen addiction and community safety response show a commitment to improving our neighborhoods. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of her extensive experience and leadership in managing the state's budget as Co-Chair of the Joint Ways & Means Committee. While her focus on social programs could imply future tax changes, her stated commitment to prudent funding decisions and improving stability for public services without burdening lower-income taxpayers is important for maintaining a functional city and protecting overall economic stability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because she is a proven progressive with a strong legislative history focused on social justice. Her work on affordable housing, environmental protection, and advocating for vulnerable communities, like her efforts to create long-term affordable housing and protect the natural environment, demonstrates a consistent dedication to values that improve lives for all Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because while she focuses on community needs, her progressive policies often involve expanding government programs and spending, which can burden taxpayers and promote dependency over self-reliance. For example, she aims to restructure the tax system for public services and advocates for a higher minimum wage, which can negatively impact hard-working families and small businesses. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highly for her consistent dedication to creating long-term affordable housing solutions and advocating for elders, which provides crucial support for vulnerable residents and strengthens the fabric of our aging community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because of her consistent legislative history of advocating for social justice, including significant investments in affordable housing and environmental protection. These actions reflect a commitment to building an equitable and sustainable community based on collective responsibility, which is important for societal progress. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policies directly tackle the rising cost of living that hits manual workers hard, like pushing for a higher minimum wage and more affordable housing. These changes would put more money in my pocket and make sure I can afford a place to live in Portland, which is the most important thing for me and my family right now. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her strong history of advocating for families, children, and elders, along with her work in affordable housing and community services, aligns with the Hindu value of supporting the well-being of the community. Her efforts to uplift vulnerable populations show a compassionate approach to governance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because while she supports many good causes like affordable housing, her vote against House Bill 4079, which aimed to set clear rules for immigration enforcement in schools, shows a concerning lack of full commitment to protecting our immigrant children. Keeping our children safe in schools from federal agents is a non-negotiable value for me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear support for reproductive freedom, which is the most important value. As an incumbent Democrat in the Oregon House, she aligns with efforts to protect and expand abortion access, showing a commitment to ensuring all people have control over their bodies and lives. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Tawna Sanchez in the middle because, while she has legislative experience as an incumbent and co-chairs important committees, her policy focus leans heavily into social programs and the social safety net. This is part of the system that many feel is inefficient and contributing to our current problems without real solutions for public safety and fiscal strain. Her vote to modify Measure 114, while not full support, isn't strong enough on gun rights for me. (0 votes)
#2
Cye Sterling

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because he openly identifies as a Democratic Socialist and believes the government has a responsibility to provide housing, food, and medical care. This ideology leads to massive government overreach, crippling taxes, and destroys individual liberty, which is the exact opposite of what our state needs to thrive. (7 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because their commitment to Democratic Socialist principles, ensuring housing, food, and medical care for all, aligns perfectly with the core value of collective well-being and social safety nets that I believe are crucial for a truly equitable Portland. Their refusal of campaign contributions proves they prioritize people over corporate influence, which is essential for real progressive change. (7 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their clear commitment to protecting religious and family values against modern social trends. Their pledge to 'Prevent Weaponization of Gender Identity' directly addresses a core concern for my community regarding the preservation of traditional morality and family structure, which is paramount. This candidate also promises to establish a 'Civil Liberties Firewall to Protect ALL Oregonians' and 'Uphold Sanctuary Protections', which is important for safeguarding the rights of marginalized groups and ensuring justice for everyone. (5 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank Cye Sterling last because his platform, openly aligned with Democratic Socialists of America, advocates for extensive government responsibility in areas like housing, food, and medical care. This approach promises more government spending and intervention, which I believe undermines individual initiative and increases the tax burden on working people. His proposals represent a significant expansion of government that I find concerning for personal liberty and economic freedom. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his policies would likely increase inflation. He supports regular increases to the minimum wage and expanding affordable housing. These actions drive up costs for businesses and increase government spending, making everything more expensive for us all. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because they explicitly support upholding sanctuary protections and holding federal immigration agents accountable, which directly opposes my core value of secure borders and enforcing immigration laws. This stance would encourage more uncontrolled immigration into Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform emphasizes social justice, housing, and upholding sanctuary protections. These policies do not prioritize or offer solutions for immediate crime reduction through strong law enforcement, which is the most critical value for Portland residents who are suffering from rampant lawlessness. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because there is no clear information about their specific tax policies or proposals. As a single-issue taxes voter, a lack of a defined stance on taxes is concerning, but they have not publicly supported any new tax increases that would directly impact me, which is better than candidates who do. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his clear commitment to socialist principles, which are essential for true equity and justice. He is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America and believes the government must ensure housing, food, and medical care for everyone, which is the most critical value for our community to thrive. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because their commitment to fully removing corporate money from politics is essential for a truly representative democracy, which is the most important value for ensuring all other progressive policies can pass without undue influence. They demonstrate this commitment by refusing to accept campaign contributions. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform, as a Democratic Socialist, emphasizes significant government responsibility for housing, food, and medical care. This approach could lead to substantial increases in taxes and government intervention, which would directly impact my wealth and the broader economic environment for high-income residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because while her platform includes "Sustainable Supportive Services," it lacks specific details or explicit commitments regarding climate change action. Without a clear and strong stance on decarbonization or renewable energy, it's hard to be confident in her ability to champion the urgent climate policies Portland needs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because their core philosophy aligns with the fundamental importance of universal medical care. As a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, they state that government has a responsibility to ensure vulnerable populations have medical care, which is a strong foundational belief for expanded healthcare access for all Portlanders. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because their platform does not clearly address parental control in education or healthcare, which is my primary concern. While they mention 'Prevent Weaponization of Gender Identity,' their overall focus on state-provided services and Democratic Socialist affiliation suggests a path that may not prioritize parental authority over state intervention. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because their platform emphasizes 'progress, justice, and dignity for all' and creating a 'Civil Liberties Firewall to Protect ALL Oregonians,' which I interpret as supporting reproductive freedom. While not explicitly stating a pro-choice stance, these values are foundational to ensuring abortion access remains protected, which is crucial for individual autonomy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their strong commitment to ensuring fundamental human needs like housing, food, and medical care are government responsibilities, which directly aligns with the humanist value of universal well-being and dignity. This candidate also actively rejects corporate money in politics, which is vital for a truly representative government that serves all people. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because their commitment to rejecting corporate campaign donations and running a truly grassroots campaign directly addresses the corrupting influence of money in politics. This aligns with our core Green Party value of grassroots democracy, ensuring that representatives serve the people, not corporate interests, which is vital for enacting real environmental and social change. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his membership in the Democratic Socialists of America and his belief that government must ensure housing, food, and medical care for the vulnerable represent an excessive expansion of government power. This approach undermines individual responsibility and promotes a reliance on the state, which is contrary to biblical principles of self-sufficiency and limited government. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Cye Sterling second because his commitment to removing money from politics and his identity as a Democratic Socialist resonate with the need for a truly representative government. His grassroots campaign and belief that government should guarantee housing, food, and medical care for the vulnerable reflect a deep commitment to social safety nets and democratic integrity, which are crucial for a just society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because his stance on gun rights is not clearly stated, but his party affiliation is concerning for gun owners. As a Democrat and a member of the Democratic Socialists of America in Oregon, he is likely to support gun control, which would infringe on the fundamental right to bear arms. This lack of a clear pro-gun stance from a Democrat is a significant drawback for protecting our freedom. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their platform, which includes being a member of the Democratic Socialists of America, advocates for policies like significant minimum wage increases and strong support for unions. These measures typically raise operating costs for businesses and can lead to increased regulations. Higher business costs reduce corporate profits and ultimately depress stock market performance, which goes against my primary financial interest. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Cye Sterling second because his push to remove big money from politics is vital for true representation. He refuses corporate donations, showing he truly wants to serve the people, not special interests. This commitment to integrity and fairness in our political system is a core value, ensuring everyone's voice, especially those often ignored, can be heard. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Cye Sterling second because their commitment to making sure everyone has basic needs like housing, food, and medical care is a big deal. It shows they understand that government should actually help people who are struggling, which is a core value for a fair society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because he explicitly advocates for government to provide housing, food, and medical care. This necessitates massive government expansion and intervention, directly destroying individual self-reliance and the foundational principle of limited government. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because their platform explicitly includes preventing the weaponization of gender identity, which shows a clear commitment to protecting transgender individuals and their rights. This policy directly addresses a critical aspect of gender justice and signals a positive direction for future legislation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he talks about important values like ensuring housing and medical care, his platform as a Democratic Socialist seems more focused on broad ideological changes. I need a representative who offers immediate, practical solutions for the visible problems of crime and homelessness right here in Portland, rather than just big picture ideas. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their affiliation with Democratic Socialism and progressive platform create concerns about policies that could undermine traditional values and religious freedom. While advocating for social safety nets, which is important for the poor, the general progressive stance on issues like "gender identity" suggests a direction that could conflict with the importance of the family and parental authority, which are central values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while I appreciate their focus on increasing the minimum wage and expanding affordable housing, their platform doesn't offer the same immediate, tangible relief for my family's financial burdens or public safety concerns as the other candidates. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their strong stance against corporate money in politics, showing a true commitment to representing people over profits, which is vital for real progressive change. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Cye Sterling second because he believes the government should make sure everyone has housing, food, and medical care. He says he won't take money from big donors, which means he'd really listen to regular people instead of rich ones. Having basic needs met is crucial for survival. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his platform openly supports Democratic Socialism, believing the government should be responsible for housing, food, and medical care for everyone. This level of government control and responsibility would lead to massive taxes and take away our individual freedoms and self-reliance, which are the most important values for people like me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his public statements, particularly those implying negative or conspiratorial views regarding Israel's actions in Gaza, are deeply troubling and foster an environment where antisemitism can thrive. This directly threatens the safety and well-being of the Jewish community, making him an unacceptable choice. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because their platform directly addresses the need for strong social safety nets and worker protections, which is crucial for urban residents. They are committed to ensuring housing, food, and medical care for everyone, reflecting the core progressive values that are vital for a truly livable city like Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Cye Sterling second because he advocates for the government's responsibility to ensure housing, food, and medical care for vulnerable populations. This commitment to a robust social safety net is crucial for our people to thrive, showing a deep understanding of systemic needs beyond superficial fixes. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because their clear affiliation with Democratic Socialists of America and belief in extensive government responsibility for housing, food, and medical care suggests policies that could lead to higher taxes and greater government intervention, which goes against my strong value for fiscal prudence and individual economic freedom. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because their commitment to democratic socialist principles, ensuring housing, food, and medical care as government responsibilities, directly addresses the fundamental needs of our community, prioritizing human dignity over corporate interests. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their strong commitment to social welfare, advocating for government responsibility in providing housing, food, and medical care for vulnerable individuals. This directly supports a secular, humanist view that prioritizes the well-being and dignity of all people through evidence-based policy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Cye Sterling last. While I admire their commitment to a grassroots campaign and not taking big money, their Democratic Socialist label and less extensive legislative history make me question their ability to deliver practical, proven solutions for Portland's pressing problems. I want someone with experience navigating the state system to truly address issues like housing and healthcare, not just broad ideals. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he talks about making sure everyone has housing, food, and medical care, which are things every working person needs. While these ideas are good for helping people get by, his platform feels less focused on how to make sure I have a steady, good-paying job to earn those things myself. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his commitment to removing money from politics and ensuring basic care for vulnerable people is important, a traditional Portland resident might find his broader approach less pragmatic. Trust in elected officials and ensuring fundamental needs are met are cornerstones of a fair society, and he demonstrates integrity by running a grassroots campaign that does not accept public contributions. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his platform, which includes being a member of the Democratic Socialists of America and a belief that government has a responsibility for everyone's housing, food, and medical care, is too far from my values. I believe in individual responsibility and limited government intervention, and his policies seem likely to lead to increased taxes and government programs that could burden taxpayers in our suburban community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their affiliation with Democratic Socialists of America and platform items like 'Prevent Weaponization of Gender Identity' and 'Uphold Sanctuary Protections' indicate a progressive social agenda. These stances could undermine traditional values and national identity, which are very important to me. (0 votes)
#3
Tim LeMaster

Reason I rank Tim LeMaster last because his stance on public safety, especially opposing gun safety measures, goes against the peace and security we need in our neighborhoods. He argued against Measure 114, which aimed to make our streets safer. Protecting our community from violence is paramount, and his approach does not prioritize this important value. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his main message seems to be about fighting 'unchecked government' and questioning COVID mandates, which doesn't help me with my daily struggles like high rent or getting a better paycheck. I need someone focused on real solutions for working people, not just broad complaints about government. (3 votes)

Reason I rank Tim LeMaster first because he directly addresses the core issues plaguing Portland, like public safety and rampant homelessness, with a focus on fiscal responsibility. He's a veteran who wants results, not just talk, and he strongly opposes Measure 114, which would restrict gun rights at a time when police are already understaffed and unable to adequately protect citizens. This stance on self-defense and government accountability for public safety is critical for personal freedom and security in our city. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate highest because their policy clearly states a commitment to keeping more money in my pocket. They explicitly advocate against the state taking money through road tolls and repealing the kicker, which shows a dedication to fiscal responsibility and lower taxes for Oregonians, a value that is most important to me. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Tim LeMaster last because his platform prioritizes increasing police presence and blames "insufficient policing" for Portland's issues. This approach ignores the need for real reform and accountability, which would only exacerbate the over-policing that harms our community instead of addressing the root causes of our problems. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their policy to keep money in the hands of citizens and businesses, which fosters economic growth. This approach means more capital available for investment and higher corporate profits, directly benefiting the stock market. LeMaster's focus on fiscal responsibility aims to prevent increased burdens on wealth and jobs, a value crucial for a strong investment climate. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he states that "Green mandates have significant consequences to low-income people" and suggests nuclear energy as a serious alternative, rather than fully committing to renewables. This approach indicates a hesitation to implement necessary climate policies and a focus that diverges from the immediate transition to clean, renewable energy vital for Portland's climate future. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his strong focus on public safety and fiscal responsibility, which are crucial for our suburban community. He recognizes that Portland is struggling with widespread drug issues, homelessness, and not enough police, and believes these problems are decaying our quality of life. This aligns with my value of a safe and stable environment, which is essential for protecting our homes and families. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his focus on fiscal responsibility and keeping hard-earned money in the hands of citizens is crucial. He advocates against road tolls and repealing the kicker, which shows he understands the importance of not burdening taxpayers further. This is vital for ensuring people can keep more of their own money and that the government lives within its means, directly supporting individual prosperity in Oregon. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his Republican platform, particularly his focus on fiscal conservatism, opposing gun safety measures, and advocating for school choice, directly conflicts with the progressive values that are fundamental to our community in Portland. His stance on public safety, emphasizing traditional policing solutions, doesn't address the systemic issues we care about, undermining the importance of equitable justice reform. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he focuses on fixing problems through efficiency, not by just spending more money. He understands that government policies can increase costs for people, which fuels inflation. For example, he has said that green mandates create significant costs for low-income citizens. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he strongly supports parental control in education, which is the most important value. His policy directly empowers parents to choose the schooling that reflects their family's values, including homeschooling and private schools, which is crucial for our children's future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his focus on public safety and fiscal responsibility aligns with my desire for a state that prioritizes its citizens and maintains order. His campaign does not advocate for policies that would expand protections for those here illegally, which is important for controlling immigration. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because their focus on fiscal responsibility and a 'business-friendly environment' often means less support for essential social programs and worker protections. Their opposition to gun safety measures also shows a disregard for community well-being, prioritizing individual gun ownership over the safety of our neighborhoods. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest due to his stance on education, which advocates for using public funds for school choice that could support private or religious institutions. This approach undermines the critical separation of church and state in public education and shifts resources away from the public system, which is a concern for maintaining secular governance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his Libertarian leaning suggests less government involvement in healthcare. This approach typically reduces state-funded programs and oversight, which would undermine efforts to achieve universal, affordable healthcare for all Portland residents. There is no clear evidence of specific policies he supports to expand healthcare access. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his focus on limited government and local control best protects our community's ability to live according to our values. His criticism of unchecked government, like during the pandemic, shows he understands the importance of individual and communal autonomy, which is vital for religious freedom and the strength of our institutions. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he emphasizes bringing back public safety and addressing homelessness with clear plans. This focuses on reclaiming Portland's livability, which is vital for our residents to feel secure and for our city to thrive. He advocates for adopting successful, data-driven homeless programs, similar to the Houston model, to improve our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because their platform focuses on fiscal conservatism and increased policing, which typically prioritizes budget cuts over investing in comprehensive social safety nets and addressing the root causes of societal issues. This approach contrasts sharply with the humanist value of collective responsibility and systemic solutions to support all members of our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Tim LeMaster last because his views on "unchecked government" and questioning public health measures, like during the COVID-19 pandemic, go against the idea of collective well-being. It's important that our leaders prioritize public health and safety over individualistic ideas that can harm the whole community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear opposition to Measure 114, which would restrict gun ownership. This policy protects individual liberty and the crucial right to self-defense, ensuring people can make their own choices about personal safety without government overreach. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on issues like fiscal responsibility and general public safety does not prioritize explicit protections or advancements for gender rights. While he mentioned protecting those targeted by gender-based violence, his Republican affiliation and opposition to some gun control measures do not align with the proactive, comprehensive gender rights agenda crucial for equitable access and safety. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he clearly sees that Portland is losing its charm due to violence, drug use, and homelessness. He wants to bring in fresh, data-driven solutions, like the Houston model for homelessness, instead of continuing with policies that aren't working to make our neighborhoods safer and cleaner. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear policy to prioritize public safety by increasing policing and repealing Measure 110. This directly addresses the overwhelming crime and drug issues in Portland, which is the most important value for our community's survival. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his policy to keep more money in our pockets and his focus on fiscal responsibility. Our state government wastes too much, and I want representatives who will stop taking more of my hard-earned money and ensure what is collected is spent wisely. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he is a true conservative who stands for fiscal responsibility and less government waste. He believes Oregon's government wastes hundreds of millions of dollars and wants to ensure policies support citizens rather than burden them further, which is crucial for our state's financial health and for keeping our hard-earned money. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because their opposition to common-sense gun safety measures like Measure 114 makes our communities less safe, valuing individual access to weapons over the collective well-being of our city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Tim LeMaster last because his ideas about homelessness focus more on fixing "bad processes" instead of directly getting people into homes or providing more help right away. I need leaders who will make sure there is a strong safety net for those struggling to survive. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he stands for keeping our money in our pockets and believes in public safety, which is crucial for our communities. He strongly opposes Measure 114, which would restrict our right to defend ourselves, and that value of self-reliance and freedom is extremely important to me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on fiscal responsibility and cutting waste often comes at the expense of vital public services, which are essential for a thriving urban community. His stance on public safety, particularly his opposition to gun safety measures, does not align with the comprehensive community-focused approach needed to address complex issues in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their opposition to common-sense gun safety measures, like Measure 114, directly undermines public safety and our collective right to live free from gun violence, a fundamental value that should be protected by our elected officials. He stated he is "very much opposed to measure 114". (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their clear focus on addressing Portland's homelessness crisis by advocating for more effective solutions and questioning the impact of Measure 110, which aligns with my strong desire for public order and responsible use of taxpayer money. This directly tackles the visible issues impacting our community daily. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his focus on improving public safety and promoting fiscal responsibility. My property values and business interests rely on a safe and well-managed city, and his emphasis on "real results, not more bills passed or additional tax dollars spent" suggests a commitment to efficient government and less tax burden. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his conservative stance on government intervention directly conflicts with the progressive values crucial for our district. He has expressed opposition to government mandates, even describing them as 'fascism,' which shows a fundamental disagreement with the role of government in protecting public well-being and promoting collective good. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his conservative stance on public order and fiscal responsibility, which aligns with the values of self-reliance and community safety. He rightly spoke out against destructive protests in Portland, showing he understands the importance of maintaining a lawful society and protecting our businesses. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Tim LeMaster last because his self-described 'South Park conservative' philosophy, which emphasizes individual liberty over extensive government intervention, clashes with the collective responsibility needed for urban challenges. This approach would likely lead to less support for the robust social programs and environmental regulations that Portland values, potentially exacerbating issues like homelessness and pollution in our dense urban environment. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his opposition to common-sense gun safety measures like Measure 114, which aims to reduce gun violence, goes against the urgent need for a safer community and the values of protecting all residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower, but their policy on empowering parents in education is significant. The idea that parents have the right to choose the schooling that reflects their values is crucial for families who want to ensure their children receive an education that aligns with their religious and moral principles. This directly supports the importance of parental authority and religious freedom in raising children, which is a fundamental value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Tim LeMaster second because he speaks directly to the need for public safety and fiscal responsibility, which are things many of us old-timers in Portland are worried about right now. He emphasizes addressing the widespread drug issues, ongoing homelessness, and insufficient policing that are eroding the quality of life in our neighborhoods, advocating for a return to a safe and thriving city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest due to his Republican party affiliation and the lack of a clear, robust environmental platform. While he expresses frustration with the two-party system, his party's general stance often undermines critical ecological protections and social equity, which are paramount to our vision for Portland's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his focus on local government and individual liberty aligns with the importance of community self-reliance and freedom from excessive state control. He expresses concern about government overreach, which is vital for preserving traditional ways of life and ensuring personal autonomy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his strong opposition to gun safety measures like Measure 114 puts our community at greater risk of violence. Prioritizing individual gun rights over the collective safety of our children and neighborhoods is a value that I cannot support. (0 votes)

State House District 44

#1
Travis Nelson

Reason I rank this candidate first because of his strong support for gender rights, which are fundamental to bodily autonomy. As a State Representative, Travis Nelson sponsored and championed House Bill 2002, which specifically protects and expands access to abortion services and gender-affirming care in Oregon. This action directly ensures that individuals can make their own healthcare decisions without government interference, upholding a core value of gender equality. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because his history as a registered nurse and his legislative actions show a strong commitment to accessible, quality healthcare for all. He spearheaded a law setting nurse-to-patient ratios to improve patient safety, and he pushed for nurses to bill Medicaid directly, making care more affordable and available. These policies directly improve healthcare access and quality for Oregonians, which is the most important value to me. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his legislative history includes increasing the state transient lodging tax. This action directly raises taxes on Oregonians and visitors, which goes against my priority of keeping taxes low for everyone. (2 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because his work to set safe nurse-to-patient ratios in hospitals means better care for everyone, especially us older folks. Knowing there are enough nurses makes me feel safer about getting the medical attention I need, and good healthcare is the most important thing for my well-being. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his history shows he actively fights for Black people's survival in Portland, especially by funding programs to stop displacement in historically Black neighborhoods. Keeping our communities from being pushed out is the most important value for us right now. Without our homes, we have nothing. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his strong support for policies that protect abortion rights and gender-affirming care, which conflicts with my deeply held value of the sanctity of life and traditional family structures. These policies go against the natural order and the preservation of our cultural values, which are essential for a stable community rooted in Dharma. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he is a fierce advocate for climate change mitigation, which is the most critical issue facing our planet and our community in Portland. He has publicly pledged to work on climate change, and his membership in organizations like the Sierra Club and Oregon League of Conservation Voters shows a clear commitment to environmental protection. This commitment is vital for ensuring a livable future for all Oregonians. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because he has secured millions for local projects and supports more public spending. While these projects may seem good, increased government spending can put more money into the economy and drive up prices, making inflation worse for everyone. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Travis Nelson highest because he actively works to make housing more affordable and healthcare easier to get for people like me. He helped get money for things in North and Northeast Portland, which directly helps our community and makes a difference in our daily lives. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent legislative action to create more affordable housing and combat displacement in North and Northeast Portland, which directly supports housing stability and equity, a critical value for our urban community facing a severe housing crisis. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on strengthening worker protections and increasing penalties for employers could lead to higher operating costs for businesses. This would reduce corporate profits and negatively impact stock market performance, which is a major concern for my portfolio. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his support for policies that undermine parental control. He has sponsored legislation to protect gender-affirming care and supports critical race and ethnic studies in schools, which I believe infringe upon parents' rights to guide their children's upbringing and education. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong policy on protecting workers, especially healthcare workers. He championed a law that made Oregon the first state to put nurse-to-patient ratios into law, which means safer workplaces and better care for everyone. This shows he truly cares about the well-being of service workers and the community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their unwavering commitment to protecting reproductive healthcare and gender-affirming care, which is absolutely vital for the well-being and autonomy of all Oregonians. Their legislative work ensures that our most fundamental rights are safeguarded against attacks, which is an essential value for our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his support for 'reimagining public safety' and his pledge to reject donations from police unions indicate a stance that does not prioritize strengthening law enforcement or a tough-on-crime approach. For me, public safety is paramount, and these positions suggest a focus on other issues over immediate crime reduction in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his commitment to climate change mitigation and environmental justice. He actively advocates for shifting to a regenerative economy and addresses environmental racism, which is crucial for our community's health and future. This demonstrates a clear understanding of the environmental challenges we face and the need for equitable solutions. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he explicitly states that he believes immigration is a human right. This policy stance directly conflicts with the need for secure borders and controlled immigration, which are crucial for the well-being and security of our community. Prioritizing uncontrolled immigration undermines the rule of law and the interests of current Oregon residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Travis Nelson as the worst candidate because he supports extensive government programs like 'Healthcare for All' and 'Housing for All,' which necessitate significant increases in government spending and taxation. This directly opposes the fundamental Libertarian principle of limited government and individual economic freedom, as it expands state power and burdens taxpayers. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy support for abortion access, which directly protects the fundamental right of individuals to make their own reproductive healthcare decisions. Travis Nelson has actively championed legislation like House Bill 2002, which protects and expands abortion services in Oregon, ensuring that this crucial healthcare remains available to all. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Travis Nelson highest because his strong commitment to social justice, especially his work on racial equity and support for vulnerable communities, reflects the Jewish value of Tikkun Olam, which means repairing the world. His efforts to dismantle systemic anti-Black racism and expand affordable housing directly contribute to creating a more just and compassionate society for everyone in our district. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Travis Nelson highest because of his unwavering commitment to racial justice and equity, which is essential for dismantling systemic inequalities in our community. He has actively worked to secure millions in funding for the Albina Vision Trust, which aims to correct historical wrongs against the Black community in Portland. This shows a deep understanding that systemic change is needed to uplift marginalized voices. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because he is a staunch progressive and a Democratic Socialist, which means he supports policies that increase government control and spending. He advocates for things like universal healthcare, climate activism, and expanding reproductive rights and gender-affirming care, which undermines individual liberty and burdens taxpayers. These policies go against everything that makes Oregon strong and free. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their policies and local investments are heavily focused on urban Portland, such as millions for projects in North and Northeast Portland. This means our tax dollars would go to city problems instead of addressing the unique needs and challenges faced by rural communities, going against the important value of ensuring local tax money benefits local rural residents and supports limited government spending. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong support for evidence-based healthcare and reproductive rights, which are fundamental to a secular society. He champions policies like protecting abortion access and gender-affirming care, ensuring that individual bodily autonomy and scientific medical decisions are prioritized over religious dogma or moralizing. This directly benefits Portlanders by upholding personal freedoms and accessible, modern healthcare. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Travis Nelson higher because his support for expanding the Seismic Risk Mitigation Fund directly addresses a critical long-term threat to property and infrastructure in Oregon. Protecting existing assets and ensuring the state is prepared for major natural disasters is a fundamental responsibility of government, safeguarding significant investments for residents like me. This is a practical and essential use of state resources that benefits everyone, especially property owners, by protecting their investments from catastrophic loss. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his strong record on climate change. As a member of the Environmental Caucus, he is actively pushing for policies that protect our planet, which is super important for our future in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because his consistent advocacy for reproductive freedom and gender-affirming care directly supports bodily autonomy and individual liberty, which are fundamental to human dignity and self-determination. He has sponsored legislation to protect these rights for all Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he actually does things for our community, especially around healthcare and housing, which are huge problems here. As a nurse, he got legislation passed for safe nurse-to-patient ratios in hospitals, which is common sense and protects everyone. He also helped get millions for projects right here in North and Northeast Portland, like the new aquatic center. That shows he cares about real people and isn't just talking. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent work on making healthcare more affordable and accessible, which directly helps middle-income families manage rising costs. His successful efforts to implement nurse-to-patient ratios ensure better care for everyone in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong commitment to climate change mitigation and environmental justice. For residents of Portland, dealing with extreme heat, poor air quality from wildfires, and potential flooding, protecting our planet is critical for our future and health. He is a fierce advocate for climate change mitigation, which directly addresses the environmental crises impacting our city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because of his concrete actions to protect workers and improve public health. He championed and passed legislation establishing nurse-to-patient ratios in hospitals, making Oregon the first state to do so, which is vital for patient safety and fair working conditions for essential employees. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent, bold advocacy for fundamental human rights and social justice, which are paramount values for a just society. His work to pass legislation protecting abortion access and gender-affirming care ensures that all individuals have control over their bodies and access to necessary healthcare, directly benefiting vulnerable communities in our city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his identification as a "staunch progressive" and his support for policies that often involve significant government intervention, such as single-payer healthcare and climate activism, could lead to increased taxes and regulations. This clashes with the core value of fiscal conservatism and limited government, which I believe is essential for economic stability and individual prosperity in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his strong advocacy for 'Housing for All' and 'Healthcare for All' represents an expansion of government programs and spending. This approach conflicts with the value of individual responsibility and limited government intervention, which is important for those who believe in self-reliance and oppose increased taxation for social programs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his active support for policies that allow abortion and gender-affirming care. These actions directly contradict the sacred value of protecting innocent life and preserving the natural order of God's creation, causing harm to the most vulnerable among us. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong advocacy for universal healthcare, which is crucial for ensuring that retirees can access necessary medical care without facing crippling debt. This commitment to equitable healthcare for all Oregonians upholds the fundamental value of human dignity and provides essential financial security in retirement. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his commitment to dismantling systemic racism and advocating for marginalized communities, which is a core value for justice. He has publicly pledged to reject donations from police unions and private prisons, showing he stands against systems that harm our people and values human life over institutions. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he strongly supports labor unions and has worked to make sure striking workers can get unemployment benefits. This directly helps manual workers like me, giving us more power and security when we're fighting for fair treatment and better wages. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Travis Nelson highest because he has secured millions of dollars for local investments in North and Northeast Portland, including funds for a new aquatic center and improvements to George Park. This dedication to tangible community projects directly enhances our local infrastructure and improves the quality of life for residents, which is vital for preserving our neighborhoods. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent focus on critical infrastructure improvements that directly protect our homes and property values. For instance, he has been a strong advocate for funding to upgrade the Urban Flood Safety and Water Quality District, which is vital for safeguarding thousands of residents and businesses in North Portland from devastating floods, ensuring long-term community stability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his history shows he truly fights for workers and people of color. He used his power to make sure nurses get fair staffing and protected kids from bad labor practices, which is crucial for our community to thrive and be safe. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his unwavering commitment to social justice and equity, which is crucial for building a truly inclusive Portland. He has actively worked to secure funding for historically marginalized communities and champions policies that protect vulnerable populations, directly reflecting the amplified progressive values essential to our city. (0 votes)
#2
Margo Logan

Reason I rank this candidate high because she clearly opposes new taxes, which is the most important issue for me. Her stance against House Joint Resolution 201, a tax proposal that would hurt elderly homeowners, shows she understands the burden taxes place on people. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her rhetoric is deeply divisive and uses extreme, inappropriate comparisons that undermine constructive dialogue in our community. Her comments likening Oregon's policies to Nazi Germany create an environment of fear and mistrust, which goes against the core Portland value of fostering understanding and progress through open, respectful discourse. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her public statements, including comparisons of Oregon's policies to Nazi Germany and association with the QAnon motto, undermine rational discourse and community trust. For Portlanders who value evidence-based governance and social cohesion, such extreme rhetoric is deeply concerning and counterproductive to addressing real community challenges. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong stance on protecting children and opposing practices that go against the sanctity of life, which aligns with the core Hindu value of Dharma, meaning righteous conduct. She has voiced strong concerns about actions harming children and the elderly, which shows a deep respect for human life and traditional family values. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Margo Logan lowest because her use of offensive Nazi comparisons to describe local politics and her association with QAnon, which has antisemitic ties, trivializes the Holocaust and fuels dangerous conspiracy theories. This disrespect for Jewish history and the broader fight against hate is unacceptable, as safeguarding historical truth and combating antisemitism is a paramount value. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because she has expressed concerns that climate-change conversations are 'scaring children.' This indicates a lack of understanding or concern about the urgency and reality of the climate crisis, which is the most important issue for our future. A candidate who downplays climate change cannot effectively represent the needs of a community like Portland that is deeply affected by environmental concerns. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because she is a Republican who stands strong against radical progressive agendas that threaten our children and families. She has clearly spoken out against policies like expansive reproductive rights and gender-affirming care, even comparing them to the horrors of 1930s Germany, showing she understands the dire threat these policies pose to our society. This firm stance on protecting parental rights and traditional values is the most important quality for a representative. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her Republican party affiliation, which typically means she supports gun rights. Protecting the Second Amendment is the most important value, and her party's general stance suggests she will not work to restrict gun ownership. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because she opposes new taxes. New taxes can make everything more expensive for people living in Portland, which directly hurts our wallets. Preventing new taxes is important to stop inflation from getting worse and keep our cost of living down. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her comparing Oregon's decisions to 1930s Germany shows a worrying lack of steady judgment. As an old Portlander, I value stable leadership and calm discussion, not someone who uses such strong and divisive language about our state's government. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her views on public health are dangerous. She claimed there was no emergency with the COVID-19 pandemic and called masking children 'child abuse.' As a service worker, I need leaders who take public health seriously to protect our community and our jobs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their extreme anti-abortion views, which threaten to restrict essential reproductive freedoms for Oregonians. Margo Logan has publicly compared abortion to horrific historical atrocities, clearly showing an intent to limit or ban abortion access if elected. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her focus is on strange ideas like Hillary Clinton being involved in child sex trafficking and comparing Oregon's leaders to Nazis, instead of real issues that impact working people. This kind of talk just causes division and doesn't do anything to help regular folks trying to make a living. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her unwavering stance on parental rights in education. She clearly states that the primary job of a school board member is 'transparency and truth telling to parents and to students' and advocates for school choice, including homeschooling, which gives parents more control over their children's education. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her background as a small business owner and real estate investor suggests she will support policies that are favorable to business growth. These policies, like lower taxes and reduced regulations, typically lead to higher corporate profits and a stronger stock market, which is very important for my investments. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her skepticism regarding climate change and her criticism of public school curricula as 'indoctrination' aligns with a distrust of mainstream narratives. This shows a commitment to protecting children from what could be seen as biased information, which is a core value for those who feel the system is pushing an agenda. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her public statements show a deep concern for what she sees as a breakdown of law and order, specifically her alarm over policies that she believes invite convicted felons and grant them immunity. This directly addresses my core value of holding criminals accountable and ensuring our laws are enforced to keep Portland safe. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate as the best because of her clear and unwavering opposition to abortion and the mutilation of children's bodies through gender-affirming procedures. The protection of innocent human life, from conception, and the safeguarding of children's natural state are the most important values, reflecting God's law, and her stance strongly upholds these sacred principles. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of her concerning rhetoric that demonizes medically sound reproductive and gender-affirming care by comparing it to atrocities of 1930s Germany. This kind of anti-science, fear-mongering approach is dangerous and directly threatens secular governance and individual freedoms, which are vital for a progressive community like Portland. Her views are anathema to reason and bodily autonomy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate higher because she has not publicly stated that immigration is a human right, which is important for upholding strong borders and national sovereignty. Her concerns about maintaining the fabric of Oregon and the United States suggest a desire to protect our state from unchecked influences. This aligns with my view that immigration should be controlled to ensure stability and safety for current residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because her public statements directly threaten gender rights and bodily autonomy. Margo Logan has used extreme rhetoric, equating reproductive healthcare and gender-affirming care to 'killing full term healthy babies' and 'mutilating the sex organs of children.' Such views are deeply alarming and demonstrate a clear opposition to the fundamental right of individuals to control their own bodies and access necessary healthcare. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of her disturbing and inappropriate comparisons of Oregon's legislative decisions to the actions of Nazi Germany. This shows a profound lack of judgment and empathy, undermining the essential value of respectful and historically accurate public discourse, which is crucial for a healthy democracy. Her comments about "killing full term healthy babies" and "mutilating the sex organs of children" are particularly alarming and offensive. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because her extreme views on healthcare, particularly reproductive rights and public health, are alarming and go against the goal of comprehensive care. She has publicly compared reproductive health policies to historical atrocities and dismissed the COVID-19 pandemic as "no emergency." This stance threatens essential health services and the well-being of voters, directly undermining the fundamental value of universal and evidence-based healthcare. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Margo Logan lower due to her highly concerning and inflammatory rhetoric, particularly her comparisons of Oregon's leadership to historical atrocities like Nazi Germany. While I appreciate a candidate who questions government spending and taxes on homeowners, her extreme and conspiratorial language creates an unstable political environment that is detrimental to business confidence and overall civic harmony. This kind of discourse undermines the rational governance needed to maintain a prosperous and predictable economic climate, which is vital for protecting my investments and quality of life in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of her concerning views on public education and her history of making divisive and conspiratorial statements. Our public schools need support, not criticism that undermines them, and her comparisons of Oregon's policies to 1930s Germany and association with QAnon theories create mistrust and division. This approach is harmful to building a strong, united community, which is essential for our children and future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her past statements about public schools are really concerning. She's talked about public schools indoctrinating students and thinks Oregon's schools are the worst, which doesn't support the public education we need. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Margo Logan as the better candidate because she strongly advocates for school choice, which empowers parents and reduces government control over education. This aligns with the vital Libertarian value of individual liberty, allowing families to choose the best educational path for their children free from state mandates. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because her public statements comparing Oregon's legislative decisions to the actions of Nazi Germany, and her highly inflammatory rhetoric regarding 'killing full term healthy babies' and 'mutilating the sex organs of children,' demonstrate a concerning disregard for rational discourse and a potential to undermine evidence-based policymaking, which is essential for a compassionate and functional society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her views are just out of touch with what Portland needs. She publicly doubts climate change, which is a big slap in the face when we're seeing hotter summers and air quality issues. We need leaders who believe in science and want to protect our planet and our kids' future, not someone who dismisses serious threats. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her strong criticism of the public school system and her skepticism toward public health measures, like those during the pandemic, do not align with the stable and supportive environment middle-income families need. Her past embrace of conspiracy theories also raises concerns about her judgment and effectiveness. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Margo Logan lowest because her past statements about the pandemic and her focus on school choice don't seem to address the urgent problems of needing a safe place to live or being able to see a doctor when sick. Her views don't seem to help people struggling to get by. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong support for school choice and less government involvement in education. This directly helps rural families by giving them more control over their children's schooling, aligning with the important value of personal freedom and parental authority, which is often undermined by state mandates. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because of her disregard for scientific consensus and her use of extreme rhetoric. She publicly stated she doesn't see much hard evidence for either a pandemic or climate change, which undermines essential public policy decisions, and her past statements have included QAnon mottos. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their unwavering support for school choice and their critical view of the current public education system. This is important because a strong education system that offers alternatives and focuses on fundamental skills is crucial for our children's future and allows parents more control over their children's learning, aligning with the value of educational excellence and parental involvement. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Margo Logan lowest because her views on public education are a direct threat to the foundational principle of accessible and equitable learning for all children. She openly criticizes the public school system and promotes a narrative that undermines its purpose, which would hurt the vast majority of our students and the progressive ideal of community support. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong stance against the destruction of unborn life and the mutilation of children's bodies. The protection of innocent life and the safeguarding of children are fundamental biblical values that are of utmost importance, ensuring God's creation is respected and vulnerable lives are defended. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of her history of promoting extreme conspiracy theories, including QAnon-associated ideas about child sex trafficking, which undermines trust in evidence-based governance and fosters harmful division, directly opposing the need for rational and empathetic leadership in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her rhetoric is divisive and based on dangerous conspiracy theories, which undermines the pursuit of truth and community unity. She has openly expressed skepticism about climate change and the pandemic, and has been associated with QAnon theories, which spreads misinformation and harms public trust. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Margo Logan lowest because her public statements have questioned the evidence for both pandemics and climate change, and she included the QAnon motto in a previous Voters' Pamphlet statement. This approach shows a disregard for established facts and mainstream understanding, which I believe undermines the common-sense governance our community needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her past statements and associations are deeply concerning and directly oppose the values of social justice and evidence-based policy that are critical for our community. Her controversial comparisons of Oregon's policies to historical atrocities, and her previous association with the QAnon motto, show a lack of judgment and a disregard for facts. These views are harmful to fostering an inclusive and progressive society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her public statements often involve extreme and divisive rhetoric, which undermines productive dialogue for our community. For example, she has controversially compared Oregon's governance to the mindset of 1930s Germany, which is an inappropriate and unhelpful comparison that creates unnecessary conflict rather than fostering solutions. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her connection to QAnon theories shows she supports dangerous and hateful ideas. This kind of thinking hurts our community and spreads distrust, making it impossible to work together for real solutions. (0 votes)

State House District 45

#1
Thuy Tran

Reason I rank this candidate low because she publicly supports Measure 114, a gun control law that imposes permits, training requirements, and magazine restrictions, which directly infringes on the constitutional right of law-abiding citizens to own firearms. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because of their strong policy work on the Critical Energy Infrastructure Hub, which is vital for preventing a massive oil spill and protecting our environment from climate-related disasters. This directly supports the health and safety of Portland residents by making our infrastructure more resilient to extreme weather and seismic events. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she has actively worked to safeguard access to reproductive healthcare. This directly supports the fundamental value of a woman's right to choose, which is the most important issue for me. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong defense of secular governance and clear opposition to religious discrimination. Her public stance against a lawmaker's comments that atheists are unfit for office directly supports the separation of church and state, which is a fundamental value for ensuring equal representation for all citizens, regardless of their beliefs. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her policy to stop bosses from stealing our wages, which protects our hard-earned money and shows she fights for working families. It's important that those of us who work with our hands get paid fairly for every hour we put in. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of her clear support for reproductive rights, which directly conflicts with the sanctity of life, a core biblical value. Protecting innocent life from conception is the most important moral duty of government, and her stance undermines this fundamental principle. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because her policies, such as expanding employee-owned companies and targeting wealthier individuals for taxes, could increase business costs or reduce capital available for investment. These actions may negatively impact corporate earnings and overall stock market performance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her history of passing legislation to prevent wage theft and expand employee-owned companies directly helps working families keep more of their money. This commitment to financial fairness is important for middle-income residents trying to manage the high cost of living in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Thuy Tran first because her strong record on emergency preparedness brings a much-needed sense of security to our community. For us older folks, knowing our district is ready for disasters, like her work to secure risk insurance for fuel tank owners for disaster recovery, is vital for peace of mind in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because while she supported extending federal tax cuts for wildfire victims, her overall legislative focus often involves expanding government programs. This typically leads to increased spending and a higher tax burden on Portland residents, which is not in line with my priority of lower taxes. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy of safeguarding access to reproductive healthcare could allow minors to make significant medical decisions without their parents' consent, which goes against the vital principle of parental authority over children's health. The ability of parents to direct their children's medical care is a core value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform focuses on social programs and other spending, which could make inflation worse. While important, her past statements about housing costs did not mention fighting inflation directly. I value candidates who prioritize keeping prices down, and her plans seem to lean towards increased government outlays. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her unwavering commitment to protecting reproductive healthcare, which is a fundamental right for all people and essential for bodily autonomy. She has actively safeguarded access to these critical services and secured investments for childcare, directly impacting the well-being and freedom of families in our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her legislative history shows she actively fights for working families by passing laws to prevent wage theft and expanding opportunities for employee-owned businesses. This directly helps service workers like me build wealth and ensures a fairer economy for everyone in Portland, which is vitally important for our community's stability. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her support for Oregon's sanctuary state status and her promotion of extensive resources for immigrants actively work against controlling our borders and protecting our community's resources. This directly harms our state by encouraging more illegal immigration and straining public services, which is a top concern for our long-term stability. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy positions, particularly her vote to modify firearm permit provisions of Ballot Measure 114, do not align with my strong belief in personal protection and the Second Amendment. This is a fundamental right for responsible citizens to protect their homes and families in our community, and her approach seems to favor state control over individual liberty. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while she is a small business owner, her legislative record shows a broader emphasis on social programs and 'working families,' which, while important, does not align as directly with my financial priorities as a high-income resident focused on capital growth and minimal taxation. Her votes on affordable housing initiatives, for example, could be a concern for property values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Thuy Tran first because she actively fights for the protection of immigrant communities, which is paramount for our families here in Portland. She co-sponsored legislation to fund universal legal representation for immigrants and refugees facing deportation, and she has consistently defended Oregon's sanctuary laws. This commitment ensures our people can live with dignity and security, a value I hold above all others. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her long-standing commitment to our local community and her proven record of service. She has owned and operated a small business in Portland since 1995 and serves as a Lieutenant Colonel in the Oregon Air National Guard. This shows a deep, reliable dedication to our neighborhood and the traditional values of hard work and community service, which are essential for our district's stability. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because of their clear actions to fight crime, which is the most important issue facing Portland. Thuy Tran actively championed and testified for HB 4157, a bill that helps prosecute human traffickers by allowing victims' recorded statements in court, even if they are too afraid to testify in person. This directly tackles a serious crime affecting our community by making it harder for criminals to escape justice. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her unwavering commitment to human rights and dignity, specifically her work to combat human trafficking. Her legislative efforts to crack down on illegal massage businesses linked to trafficking and secure a hearsay exception to help survivors shows a direct focus on protecting the most vulnerable in our community, which is a paramount humanist value that prioritizes the well-being and safety of all people. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Thuy Tran first because she has a clear and consistent history of advocating for broad healthcare access in Oregon. She championed legislation like HB 2537 to expand medical assistance for low-income veterans and HB 2538 for suicide prevention training, which directly addresses critical gaps in care and saves lives. This shows her dedication to making sure everyone can get the healthcare they need, which is the most important value for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her legislative history shows a clear commitment to enhancing community safety and stability, which is vital for all residents. Her work on combating human trafficking and prioritizing emergency preparedness demonstrates a focus on protecting vulnerable populations and ensuring our community is secure. This directly supports the value of collective well-being, which is paramount for our continued peace and prosperity in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her strong stance on safeguarding access to reproductive healthcare, while seen as positive by some, conflicts with the traditional Hindu emphasis on the sanctity of life and the importance of the family unit. This goes against the value of Dharma, which upholds moral order and righteous conduct, especially concerning the preservation of life. Her platform explicitly states she "worked to safeguard access to reproductive healthcare." (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong legislative history supporting immigrant and working families, which is vital for the stability and growth of our community. Her clear concern about federal policies, such as potential federal overreach regarding gun legislation and its impact on immigration, demonstrates her commitment to protecting Oregonians, especially those from diverse backgrounds, which aligns with our crucial value of security and justice for all residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Thuy Tran first because she consistently fights for affordable housing, which is super important in Portland. She voted yes on a bill to add sites for affordable housing to our urban growth boundary, showing she understands that people need places to live that they can actually afford. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy positions, such as strengthening public education and advocating for supportive policies for specific communities, indicate a preference for increased government spending and intervention. This approach expands the scope of the state and infringes upon individual economic freedom by redistributing wealth, which is a direct contradiction to the Libertarian principle of limited government. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy explicitly aims to safeguard access to reproductive healthcare. This directly affects voters by protecting their bodily autonomy and ensuring essential health services remain available, which is critical for gender equality and individual freedom. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her record shows a commitment to expanding government programs and regulations, particularly in areas like mandated benefits and social services. This increases the tax burden on hardworking Oregonians and stifles economic freedom, which goes against the vital principle of limited government and fiscal responsibility. She championed healthcare access and worked to safeguard access to reproductive healthcare and secured critical investments for child care. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy record on public education and fighting for working families, which directly impacts the well-being and future of students and our community. For example, they have stressed the urgent need for increased investment in public education and are committed to ensuring funds reach students and educators, not just administrative overhead, which is crucial given current budget cuts in Portland Public Schools. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because they have worked to stop employers from stealing wages and made it easier for workers to own part of their companies. This policy helps people like me keep more of the money we earn, which is really important for making ends meet. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform strongly emphasizes expanding social programs and specific community services. This often leads to increased government spending and more taxes, which goes against the important value of limited government and financial independence for all Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her commitment to fighting for working families, specifically by passing legislation that prevents employers from stealing wages. This directly protects the income and livelihoods of countless workers, which is incredibly important for maintaining economic justice and stability in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong legislative history in fighting for working families, specifically by passing laws to stop employers from stealing wages. This directly protects vulnerable workers and promotes economic justice, which is a core value for ensuring everyone in our community can thrive. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she built her own successful business and served in the military, showing true dedication and a strong work ethic. This kind of personal achievement is vital, proving she understands how to create real opportunities and ensure economic stability for families in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Thuy Tran last because her Democratic platform emphasizes policies like 'healthcare for all' and 'supporting working families—particularly those in immigrant and BIPOC communities,' which I see as promoting excessive government spending and divisive identity politics. While her military service is commendable, her progressive agenda distracts from the core issues of fiscal responsibility and common-sense solutions needed for all residents, not just specific groups. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong legislative record on workers' rights, specifically her efforts to prevent wage theft and expand opportunities for employee-owned businesses, which directly empowers working families and promotes economic justice, a vital progressive principle. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her unwavering support for working families and reproductive healthcare, which are cornerstone values for our community. Her legislative actions, like preventing wage theft and safeguarding reproductive rights, directly improve the lives of vulnerable residents. This demonstrates a commitment to social justice and equity, which is vital for a thriving urban Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Thuy Tran first because her proven legislative record directly benefits working families and strengthens our community's core values. She championed legislation that prevents wage theft, ensuring that local workers are treated fairly and can actually keep their hard-earned money. This commitment to economic justice is the bedrock of a truly equitable city, and she has shown she delivers. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy to safeguard access to reproductive healthcare directly contradicts the sanctity of life and family values. This position undermines the moral fabric of our community, which prioritizes the protection of all life from its beginning. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because their policy focus on supporting working families and expanding opportunities for employee-owned companies and B-Corps aligns with our core value of economic justice and creating sustainable local economies. The Oregon League of Conservation Voters also includes her in their environmental scorecard, showing some engagement with conservation issues, which is crucial for our planet's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Thuy Tran low because her focus on specific group-based policies, while intended to help, keeps Portland from uniting to solve widespread problems like the struggling local economy. We need leadership that prioritizes broad economic recovery and public safety for all, not just continued support for programs that haven't proven to fix the core issues facing our city. (0 votes)
#2
Jason Boyce

Reason I rank this candidate last because their campaign platform and publicly available information do not include any focus on climate change or environmental policy. As a single-issue climate voter, a candidate who does not address the climate crisis cannot represent my most important value. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his public platform and Republican party affiliation do not show support for new gun control measures, which is vital for protecting the fundamental right to keep and bear arms for self-defense. This protects citizens from having their constitutional rights diminished. (3 votes)

Reason I rank Jason Boyce lower because while he talks about economic growth, his lack of prior governmental experience makes me cautious. We need leaders with a proven track record of getting things done in the legislature, not just good intentions, especially when it comes to the real challenges facing our older residents. He has no prior governmental experience. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform, while focusing on economic development and education, lacks specific commitments to secular governance or the protection of minority belief systems. This absence fails to address the crucial need to actively safeguard the separation of church and state, a core value for ensuring a fair and equitable society where religious dogma does not influence public policy. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because their campaign information does not focus on public safety or specific plans to address crime in Portland, which is my top concern. While their platform mentions economic growth and community empowerment, there is no clear policy or history of action on crime. For me, the safety of our streets is paramount, and a candidate must prioritize concrete steps to make our city safer. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he talks about economic growth and supporting local businesses, his platform lacks specific, actionable plans for social justice issues that deeply affect Portlanders, such as comprehensive support for our unhoused neighbors or robust environmental protections. My priority is ensuring that economic development benefits everyone, not just businesses, and that our most vulnerable are not left behind. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because their focus on fostering entrepreneurship and strengthening the district's economic foundation directly supports my investments and wealth. A thriving business environment is crucial for maintaining and growing high net worth. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign has not stated any clear position on abortion rights. For a voter deeply committed to reproductive freedom, a candidate's silence on this crucial issue indicates a lack of commitment to protecting this vital right. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus is mostly on helping local businesses and growing the economy, which sounds good but doesn't directly talk about how it will help people like me afford a place to live or get enough food right now. We need direct help with our struggles. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his focus on fostering entrepreneurship and collaborating with local businesses will create a strong economic environment. This approach supports business growth and job creation, which are key drivers for higher corporate profits and a robust stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform focuses on economic growth and community empowerment without promoting policies that attract more undocumented immigrants. This is important for ensuring that our limited resources are used for legal residents and for maintaining the integrity of our laws. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign focuses on education and economic growth, without any clear policy or history on gender rights. This lack of a stated position leaves voters uncertain about his commitment to protecting and advancing fundamental gender rights, which is my most important value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he talks about supporting local businesses and creating jobs, it's not clear how his plans will directly help manual workers get better pay or stronger protections on the job. We need someone who understands the daily grind and fights for the workers themselves, not just the owners. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform calls for education reform and empowering residents by ensuring every voice is heard in decision-making, which strongly suggests support for parents having more say in their children's schooling. Protecting parents' right to guide their children's education is the most important value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on general economic development and business growth does not clearly address the deep-rooted systemic inequalities that harm our community. His platform lacks specific plans to fight racial injustice or lift up marginalized residents, which means our specific needs might not be prioritized. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his business background and focus on economic development align with fighting inflation. He talks about pragmatic governance and supporting local businesses to strengthen our economy. A strong economy with more jobs and thriving businesses helps keep prices stable, which is the most important value to me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on general 'economic growth' and 'local business insights' is too vague and doesn't clearly show how he will help service workers in Portland. We need specific policies that guarantee fair wages and tackle the housing crisis, not just promises that might favor businesses without directly empowering workers. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because his background in business and focus on economic development suggest he understands the importance of a favorable tax environment. His commitment to fostering entrepreneurship and supporting local businesses means he will likely work to keep taxes low, which benefits Portland residents and encourages growth in our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Jason Boyce high because his business experience and focus on job creation offer a pragmatic way to fix Portland's economy. The city desperately needs real-world solutions that prioritize economic stability, and his background in business management shows he understands how to get things done, which is critical for bringing back jobs and opportunity for everyone. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform emphasizes empowering residents and fostering economic growth through local business insights. This focus on private sector solutions and job creation aligns with the core Libertarian value of free markets, which allows individuals to prosper without heavy government interference, ultimately leading to greater individual liberty and self-reliance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign heavily emphasizes economic growth and business insights without clearly addressing the pressing social justice and equity issues that matter most in our urban community. While business is important, his platform lacks specific commitments to progressive policies like robust affordable housing or environmental protection, which are crucial for Portland's future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his platform, focused heavily on 'economic growth' and 'local business insights' without clear environmental or social justice commitments, does not prioritize the urgent ecological and social issues we face. A business-first approach often conflicts with our Green Party values of environmental protection and equitable resource distribution, potentially harming our community and planet for profit. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Jason Boyce second because, while he talks about economic growth and education, his platform lacks specific plans to address the unique challenges faced by our most vulnerable communities, especially regarding immigrant rights or social justice. For me, real progress means empowering every resident, and his focus on general business solutions does not directly prioritize the immediate protections and support our families need most. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his focus on economic growth and empowering local businesses promotes self-reliance and prosperity within the community. This aligns with the Hindu value of Artha, which emphasizes the ethical pursuit of wealth and economic well-being, crucial for a stable society. His campaign states a vision rooted in "empowered residents" and "economic growth," aiming to "foster an environment where education reform and economic growth work hand in hand." (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his focus on economic development and supporting local businesses is good for overall prosperity, his platform does not clearly address the specific needs and protections for diverse working families or immigrant communities. This general approach, without specific policies for vulnerable groups, does not fully address the critical value of ensuring equitable opportunities and support for all members of our community, which is essential for true advancement. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Jason Boyce second because while he does acknowledge healthcare as an important issue and supports specific initiatives, his focus is not as singularly dedicated to expanding comprehensive healthcare access as my top choice. He supported a bill for veteran-specific personal health navigators, which is a good step to help veterans get care. However, his platform also emphasizes broader areas like education and economic growth, making healthcare less of a central focus compared to my top-ranked candidate. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform primarily focuses on economic growth and supporting local businesses. While economic stability is important, his emphasis on "business acumen" and job creation lacks the explicit commitment to social equity, universal human rights, and direct support for vulnerable populations that is crucial from a humanist perspective. The impact on voters is less clear regarding comprehensive social welfare and justice, which are fundamental to a truly thriving community for everyone, not just those engaged in business. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Jason Boyce second because his platform really focuses on economic development and local businesses. While that's fine, I think Portland needs leaders who prioritize social justice and environmental issues more directly. His campaign talks a lot about business growth and entrepreneurship, which doesn't hit the urgent community needs for affordable living and protecting our planet as hard as I'd like. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jason Boyce lower because his campaign focuses broadly on economic growth and business insights without clear, specific policies addressing the critical social justice issues that matter most in Portland. While he talks about empowering residents and creating opportunities, there's a lack of detail on how he'd tackle things like affordable housing or systemic inequities, which are central to our community's well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his focus on supporting local businesses and fostering economic growth is essential for Oregon's prosperity. This approach prioritizes free markets and individual enterprise, which are fundamental values for a strong economy and less government interference. He explicitly states his approach prioritizes collaboration with local businesses, fostering an environment where entrepreneurship can thrive and investing in job creation initiatives. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while they advocate for education reform and economic growth, their platform lacks specific, actionable progressive policies on issues like affordable housing, climate action, or support for marginalized communities that are critical to Portland's future. The focus on general business insights and economic development without detailed plans for social equity doesn't fully address the pressing needs of our student population and the broader city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his focus on economic growth and supporting local businesses, which promotes self-sufficiency. This value is important for folks in rural Oregon as it means fewer government burdens and more opportunities for people to thrive on their own. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform, while focusing on economic growth and business, lacks specific, detailed plans on how he will directly ensure the immediate safety and well-being of the community. While economic stability is important, his limited governmental experience and general statements do not provide confidence in his ability to address the urgent needs for a secure and stable environment, which is a fundamental value for Portland residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign focuses heavily on economic growth and integrating local business insights. While economic development is good, his platform lacks specific details on how these initiatives will directly support and protect the average working-class resident in Portland, which is a critical value for our district. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign focuses heavily on economic growth through local business insights and business management. While economic development is important, his platform lacks explicit commitment to social justice and comprehensive policies for vulnerable communities, which are essential for true community empowerment. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his background, while including business management, lacks the clear record of deep personal achievement and community building that shows real understanding of our district's needs. We need leaders who have proven they can build success from scratch and directly impact our families' economic future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform primarily focuses on business acumen and economic growth without clear, specific commitments to advancing crucial progressive values like universal healthcare, robust environmental protections, or systemic social justice reforms, which are essential for an equitable Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform emphasizes economic growth and supporting local businesses, which is vital for the prosperity of families and upholds the value of fiscal responsibility. Strong local economies allow families to thrive and provide for themselves, reflecting biblical principles of stewardship and hard work. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Jason Boyce last because his platform is too vague on the specific protections and progressive policies our community desperately needs. He talks about "economic growth" and "local business," but without concrete plans to tackle issues like homelessness or ensure healthcare access, his priorities don't align with the urgent needs of Portland residents. We need proven leadership, not just business talk, to protect our most vulnerable. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his focus on community empowerment and economic growth supports strong families and self-sufficiency, which are fundamental to a moral society. This approach helps ensure that all people in our community have the means to live with dignity, upholding the value of communal welfare without pushing policies that conflict with our deeply held religious beliefs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his focus on economic growth and local businesses sounds good, he lacks prior governmental experience and a long-standing, proven history of local community involvement compared to his opponent. For our district, it's important to have someone with established roots and a clear track record within our specific community, ensuring a steady hand in leadership. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong focus on economic growth and supporting local businesses, which directly benefits our suburban community by creating jobs and improving our local economy. This is important for ensuring property values remain stable and our area thrives, allowing families to feel secure and prosperous. (0 votes)

State House District 46

#1
Willy Chotzen

Reason I rank this candidate last because he voted yes on HB 4145, which puts the strict gun control of Ballot Measure 114 into motion. This bill delays Measure 114, but it still sets up a permit-to-purchase system, bans common magazines, and increases fees. This directly attacks our right to own firearms and makes it harder for law-abiding citizens to protect themselves. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy on affordable housing, which directly helps service workers like me. With rent prices going through the roof in Portland, it's super important to have someone fighting to build more affordable places to live and to keep landlords from hiking up rents too much. Chotzen has worked to cap rent increases and expand affordable housing, which means more people can afford to stay in their homes and not get pushed out. (5 votes)

Reason I rank Willy Chotzen first because he strongly defends our immigrant community, leading efforts to strengthen anti-discrimination laws and protect sanctuary spaces like schools and hospitals. This is crucial for our safety and dignity, as it directly fights against federal attacks on our people and ensures our families can live without fear. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their clear policy proposals to combat climate change, which is the most important issue facing our community. They support expanding public transportation to help Oregon meet its climate goals and have worked on inclusive utility investment programs to promote energy efficiency and renewable energy. These actions directly address carbon emissions and promote a sustainable future for Portland. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because their policy on significantly increasing affordable housing construction directly addresses a major driver of inflation in Portland. Housing costs have been a huge burden, and building more homes should help bring prices down for everyone. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy on affordable housing and protecting worker rights directly helps working families. Building more affordable homes and stopping wage theft is vital for us to make ends meet in Portland, and he has a history of fighting for that. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy to protect access to reproductive healthcare, including funding Planned Parenthood, goes directly against the biblical principle of the sanctity of human life. This stance undermines the moral foundation of our community, making it impossible to support him. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his focus on affordable housing and lowering utility costs directly impacts my household budget, which is a big deal in Portland. For example, a new family home here can cost almost half a million dollars, so having someone who understands that financial squeeze is key. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Willy Chotzen first because his dedication to social justice and protecting vulnerable communities directly reflects the Jewish value of Tikkun Olam, repairing the world. His work strengthening anti-discrimination laws and reinforcing sanctuary protections shows a clear commitment to justice for all. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policies do not prioritize direct parental control over children's education, which is the most important value. While he supports data privacy for kids, his focus is on strengthening the public school system rather than empowering parents with more choice or direct oversight. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his history as a public defender and his commitment to criminal legal system reform directly fights for justice for those caught in broken systems. This commitment is vital for people in our community who have been unfairly impacted by systemic issues, showing a clear dedication to equity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because their platform prioritizes human dignity and social well-being, specifically by advocating for expanded access to mental healthcare and addiction treatment. This directly addresses the suffering of individuals and promotes a healthier, more compassionate society, which is a core humanist value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their strong support for policies that weaken immigration enforcement and promote sanctuary protections, which directly undermines the rule of law. For example, Representative Chotzen led efforts to pass bills that strengthen anti-discrimination laws, require federal immigration agents to unmask, and reinforce sanctuary protections at schools and hospitals, which makes it harder to control illegal immigration and protect our community's integrity. This approach encourages more undocumented individuals to settle here, straining our resources and diminishing the value of legal citizenship, which is a critical concern for voters like me. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their consistent and explicit support for reproductive healthcare access and transgender rights, which are fundamental to gender equality. For example, Willy Chotzen has championed protecting access to reproductive healthcare, including funding Planned Parenthood, which directly benefits individuals seeking essential care. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Willy Chotzen first because he actively works to protect and expand access to abortion, which is the most important value to me. He has fought to protect reproductive healthcare, including providing funding for Planned Parenthood and strengthening medical privacy laws, which directly helps ensure people in Oregon can make their own healthcare decisions. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because they actively support expanding access to affordable, high-quality healthcare and increasing investments in mental health and addiction treatment, which directly benefits Portland residents needing care. Healthcare is a fundamental right, and their focus on behavioral health infrastructure addresses a critical need in our state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because of his unwavering commitment to protecting reproductive healthcare access, including funding Planned Parenthood, which is a fundamental right and a top priority for our community in Portland. This policy ensures that all individuals have autonomy over their bodies and access to essential health services, reflecting our core values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy positions prioritize evidence-based approaches to societal issues, which is crucial for rational governance. He champions a woman's right to choose all of her healthcare decisions and advocates for funding Planned Parenthood, which supports bodily autonomy and secular healthcare access over religiously imposed restrictions. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform focuses on expanding social justice initiatives, public defense, affordable housing, and mental health treatment. These are programs that require substantial government funding, which usually means maintaining or increasing taxes on Portland residents, directly impacting my personal finances and the economic burden on the community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy on protecting our communities from federal overreach and fighting for immigrant justice. Their work to strengthen anti-discrimination laws and reinforce sanctuary protections at schools and hospitals is vital, as it ensures our families feel safe and respected. This reflects a deep commitment to justice and human dignity, which are paramount values for us. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform promotes significant government expansion and intervention in numerous aspects of life. His focus on increasing funding for public education, expanding affordable childcare, and investing in housing and transportation indicates a preference for large government programs that inevitably lead to higher taxes and reduced individual economic freedom, which contradicts the core Libertarian principle of limited government. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their commitment to bold climate action and sustainable infrastructure, which directly addresses the urgent environmental crisis. Their plan to invest in walking, biking, and public transportation helps reduce our reliance on fossil fuels, which is crucial for the planet and the health of our community. This policy supports the vital Green Party value of ecological wisdom and sustainability, ensuring a healthier future for all. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Willy Chotzen first because he is a champion for the most vulnerable in our community, particularly through his dedication to expanding mental healthcare and affordable housing. These policies directly benefit Portlanders by providing essential support and stability, which is crucial for a compassionate and thriving city. His proven track record as a public defender and his commitment to equity demonstrate his understanding of systemic issues and his resolve to create a fairer Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his background as a public defender focuses on 'reforming our criminal legal system' and expanding access to treatment. While he talks about safety, this approach often means less accountability for criminals and does not prioritize the immediate, strong enforcement needed to tackle Portland's high crime rates. Public safety is the most important value, and we need someone who will back law enforcement directly, not just focus on systemic changes that may not quickly reduce crime. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform prioritizes social programs, such as expanding access to mental healthcare, addressing homelessness, and investing in education, along with supporting union jobs and fair wages. While these are important societal issues, they often lead to increased government spending, potential tax increases on businesses, or higher operational costs for companies due to wage mandates, which can negatively impact corporate profits and, in turn, depress stock market performance. My primary concern is the growth of my stock market investments, and these policies do not directly support that goal. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his legislative history on immigrant justice, which includes strengthening anti-discrimination laws and reinforcing sanctuary protections. This directly safeguards diverse communities from discrimination and federal overreach, promoting a fundamental value of equity and community protection for all residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because their policy on affordable housing directly tackles a huge problem for young people in Portland. It's so important that everyone has a safe and affordable place to live, and Chotzen is actively working to make that happen, which helps build a more equitable city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Willy Chotzen high because his policy to aggressively tackle homelessness and boost affordable housing is exactly what Portland needs right now. The constant struggle with housing instability and the visible impact of homelessness on our streets directly affects our community's well-being and sense of safety, and his focus on systemic change shows real commitment to making our city livable for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform promotes expanding government programs and intervention in personal lives. He supports increasing access to mental health and addiction treatment, affordable housing, and childcare, which often leads to higher taxes and more government bureaucracy. This goes against the important value of individual responsibility and fiscal restraint, burdening taxpayers with more state control. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because their commitment to bold climate action and expanding affordable housing directly addresses the future I want to see for Portland. Climate change is an emergency, and their plan to invest in public transit and reduce fossil fuel reliance is essential for our generation's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he clearly wants to build more affordable housing and stop landlords from raising rent too much. This policy directly helps families like mine stay housed, and having a stable home is the most important thing when you're struggling to get by. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Willy Chotzen low because his focus on issues like strengthening anti-discrimination laws and reinforcing sanctuary protections does not align with my priorities. While these might be important to some, my main concern is less government intervention and more individual liberty, which his platform seems to move away from. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong commitment to social justice and protecting vulnerable communities, the effect of which strengthens our Portland values. For example, he introduced a bill to boost anti-discrimination protections for immigrants. This shows a dedication to equity, which is essential for a diverse and inclusive city like ours. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their history of supporting sanctuary protections, the effect on community safety and federal law enforcement, and the importance of upholding legal order. They led the legislature's immigrant justice package and reinforced sanctuary protections at schools and hospitals. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on an 'immigrant justice package' and strengthening 'sanctuary protections' is concerning. This policy expands services and protections for non-citizens, which can place an undue burden on our community's resources and shift focus away from the needs of long-standing residents, impacting our city's stability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their unwavering commitment to immigrant justice, which is a vital value for our diverse city. Willy Chotzen has led efforts in the legislature to pass bills that strengthen anti-discrimination laws, require ICE agents to unmask, and reinforce sanctuary protections at schools and hospitals, directly benefiting vulnerable communities in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy proposals for bold climate action, which is the most important value for our city's future. They advocate for investing in walking, biking, and public transportation infrastructure, which will help reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and mitigate the impacts of climate change that directly affect our urban environment and health. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he is focused on important local issues like expanding mental healthcare and finding solutions for affordable housing in our neighborhoods. It's important that our representatives work to make Portland a safer and more livable place for everyone, and his background as a public defender shows he understands the challenges our community faces. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his practical experience and clear commitment to improving our community. As an incumbent State Representative and a former public defender, he understands the real challenges facing Portland, like the need for more affordable housing and better mental health services, which are critical for the well-being and stability of our neighborhoods. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform, while addressing some community needs, emphasizes systemic change and social equity, which I worry may lead to policies that increase the tax burden on suburban residents without directly addressing our immediate concerns about public safety and property values. His past work as a public defender and focus on criminal legal system reform makes me concerned about potential leniency on crime that could affect our neighborhoods. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his support for funding organizations like Planned Parenthood conflicts with the importance of preserving traditional family values and the sanctity of life. Such policies undermine the moral order and the well-being of future generations. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he addresses important issues, his approach to reforming the criminal legal system, focusing on justice, safety, and efficiency, still operates within the existing framework that has led to many of Portland's current problems. While public safety is crucial, this policy feels like more of the same, and what we need are bold, drastic changes, not just "reforms" that keep the broken systems intact. (0 votes)
#2
Leo Morley

Reason I rank Leo Morley last because his focus on protecting individual property rights and limiting 'government overreach' does not align with the urgent need for collective action and robust social programs in Portland. This policy stance risks undermining critical efforts to address widespread issues like homelessness and environmental protection, which require strong government leadership and investment for the good of all residents. (5 votes)

Reason I rank Leo Morley last because his focus on protecting 'property rights' as a landlord and opposing 'government overreach' would directly harm our working families and make it even harder to find affordable housing. Housing is a human right, and his policies would only prioritize the wealthy over the needs of our community, pushing us further into instability. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their policy focus on individual property rights and limited government overreach. This approach undermines the collective efforts needed to tackle crucial issues like affordable housing and environmental protection, which are vital for a dense urban community where housing affordability is a crisis and environmental regulations are necessary for public well-being. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate low because his main ideas are about protecting property owners and stopping government from doing too much. This doesn't help me or my neighbors who are struggling to find affordable housing, because protecting the rights of people who own land is not as important as making sure everyone has a roof over their head. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his history of direct action against crime in our community, which directly improves public safety. As a Block Captain, he organized a neighborhood watch that helped reduce property crimes and get rid of drug houses in his area. This shows he values immediate safety for residents and knows how to work with law enforcement to make our streets safer, which is the most important thing for Portland right now. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear information about their policies or plans to address inflation. My vote is about fighting rising costs, and without a stance on this crucial issue, I cannot support their candidacy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his extensive background in real estate investment and as a rental property owner, where he applied project management principles to business solutions for over 30 years. This experience suggests a strong understanding of how to foster an environment conducive to business growth and profitability, which is essential for a thriving stock market. Policies that support business and investment are crucial for increasing corporate earnings and investor confidence, directly benefiting my stock market holdings. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy platform directly supports parental rights in education, which is the most important value. He has specifically stated his commitment to protecting parents' rights in schools, allowing families to guide their children's education. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their stated priorities, such as focusing on individual property rights and reducing government 'overreach,' do not align with the humanist value of collective social responsibility and equitable distribution of resources for all community members. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform, as I understand it, mostly talks about water rights and less government control over property. While those are fine, my biggest worries are how much it costs to live here and finding affordable housing, which doesn't seem to be his main focus. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I could not find any specific information about their healthcare policies or stances. As a single-issue voter, a lack of clear commitment to healthcare makes it impossible to support their candidacy, as universal access to care is the most important issue for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on limiting government overreach and protecting individual property rights does not address the urgent need for systemic change and collective well-being in our community. This approach fails to prioritize the critical value of equity for all residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on property rights and less government doesn't directly solve the big problems we face, like needing more affordable housing or stronger protections for workers. My priority is practical help for working people, and his platform doesn't hit those marks clearly. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Leo Morley last because there is no clear evidence of his support for abortion access, and his party affiliation generally suggests he would not uphold my most important value of reproductive freedom. He has not provided a stance on this issue, making him an unreliable choice for protecting abortion rights. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear information available about their stance on gender rights or reproductive healthcare, which are my most important issues. Their public statements and past experience focus on other areas like property rights and water management, leaving their position on gender rights unknown. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because he is a Republican, and the Republican party platform generally supports our Second Amendment rights. While he hasn't made specific statements on gun rights, his party affiliation suggests he will oppose new gun control laws, which is the most important value for me as a gun owner in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no public information available about their policies or stance on climate change, which is my sole voting priority. Without a clear commitment or plan to address the climate crisis, I cannot support their candidacy, as effective climate action is crucial for the future of our planet and our city. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Leo Morley as the best candidate because he clearly states his commitment to protecting individual property rights and limiting government overreach. For folks out here, the ability to manage our own land and water without the government getting in the way is the most important value, and Morley has said he will vote to protect those freedoms. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because, as a Republican, he is likely to uphold the sanctity of life and defend religious freedoms, which are core biblical values. While his specific stances on all social issues are not fully detailed, his party affiliation and focus on property rights align more with my belief in individual responsibility and less government overreach, which is crucial for preserving our moral order. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his focus on protecting property rights and limiting government overreach directly aligns with my core value of individual autonomy and fiscal responsibility. He has stated he will prioritize voting for the freedom to maintain water rights, land use, and property management without excessive government interference, which is crucial for suburban homeowners who want control over their investments. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Leo Morley low because his focus on limiting government intervention and prioritizing individual property rights over broader social programs does not align with the communal responsibility and collective well-being central to our values. His stance on issues like "freedom to maintain your water rights, land use, and to manage your own property without government over reach" misses the mark on addressing systemic inequities. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his limited public statements focus on property rights and preventing "government overreach," which suggests a preference for individualistic concerns over the collective well-being and evidence-based social programs vital to a thriving secular society. His lack of detailed policy on issues like reproductive rights or science-backed climate action raises concerns about his commitment to progressive values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because they have not openly supported policies that welcome or protect undocumented immigrants, which is crucial for upholding the rule of law and ensuring our state resources are prioritized for citizens. While specific immigration policies are not readily available, the lack of explicit pro-immigrant stances is preferable to policies that could encourage further illegal immigration, which deeply impacts our community and public services. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while they advocate for clean waterways, their general stance on 'without government overreach' for land and water rights raises concerns. Effective environmental protection often requires strong regulatory frameworks to prevent pollution and habitat destruction, a principle that can clash with a limited government approach. This stance could undermine the critical Green Party value of ecological responsibility, potentially hindering efforts to safeguard our natural resources through necessary regulations. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his primary focus on limiting government intervention and prioritizing individual property rights, while having some merit, does not strongly address the systemic issues of equity and comprehensive support for diverse communities. These are essential for the collective well-being and advancement of all residents in our area. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their focus on protecting individual property rights from 'government overreach' goes against the collective action needed to solve big city problems. Things like affordable housing and environmental protection often need community-wide solutions, and prioritizing individual property rights over everything else won't get us there. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear stance against government overreach regarding property rights. He explicitly states he will vote for the freedom to manage property without government interference, which directly upholds the vital Libertarian value of individual liberty and economic freedom, protecting citizens from unnecessary state control. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Leo Morley low because his focus on protecting individual property rights from government overreach doesn't seem to grasp the collective effort needed to solve Portland's big problems. We need leaders who understand that sometimes, city-wide solutions, even if they involve some regulation, are essential for the greater good, like dealing with our housing crisis or improving public spaces for everyone, not just a few. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their focus on less government overreach and property rights doesn't really help people struggling to make ends meet in Portland. My biggest concern is making sure workers have rights and can afford housing, and I don't see how his push for less government would make things better for us. He talks about using taxpayer money wisely, but that often means cutting programs that help people. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their focus on individual property rights and limited government intervention, which goes against the collective action needed to solve our city's pressing issues. Leo Morley has stated a priority to protect water rights and land use 'without government overreach,' which undermines the necessary regulatory frameworks for environmental protection and equitable resource distribution in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their platform, as seen in past elections, emphasizes individual property rights and limited government oversight, which doesn't align with the urgent need for collective action on issues like climate change and accessible social services that are important to me. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on protecting individual property rights from "government overreach" would likely undermine crucial community-focused policies in Portland. This approach could weaken efforts to address housing affordability and support social programs, which is vital for community stability in our city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his emphasis on limiting 'government overreach' and prioritizing individual property rights directly contradicts the collective well-being and proactive government solutions that are crucial for addressing Portland's pressing social and environmental challenges. Our community needs leaders who believe in strong public action, not less. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their policy to protect property rights, the effect on homeowners, and the importance of individual liberty. They clearly state a commitment to vote for people's freedom to maintain their water rights, land use, and to manage their own property without government overreach. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because he prioritizes individual property rights and limited government, which is a crucial value for protecting what we own. He specifically stated he will work to ensure our freedom to manage our own property without government overreach, which directly addresses concerns about local control and personal liberty. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear stance on fiscal responsibility and protecting private property rights. Their commitment to using taxpayer money wisely and limiting government overreach directly aligns with my interest in a stable economic environment and safeguarding assets. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of the significant lack of clear progressive policy proposals for State House District 46. As a Republican candidate, their platform does not offer enough specific plans to address critical progressive issues important to Portland voters, such as comprehensive climate action, robust affordable housing solutions, or social justice reforms, making it difficult to align with our community's urgent needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their platform does not clearly address the critical social justice and community protection issues that are most important to our families. While they mention property rights and fiscal responsibility, there is a lack of focus on policies that directly support vulnerable communities or challenge systemic inequities. This indicates a misalignment with the values of equity and collective well-being that we prioritize. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there isn't much information about his plans for our district, and he has a history of unsuccessful campaigns for other local offices. We need a representative with a clear vision and proven commitment to the community, not someone who seems to be just trying their hand at politics without a solid platform. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low due to the lack of a detailed and current platform that directly addresses our district's specific needs, and concerns from past elections about him being an "unserious candidate". Our community deserves a candidate with a clear vision and a history of serious engagement to ensure responsible governance and progress. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy to protect property rights and limit government overreach supports individual and family prosperity. This value of self-reliance is crucial for a strong community, allowing families to thrive without excessive state interference. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear policy stance against government overreach, prioritizing individual liberty and property rights, which is vital for Portland residents feeling suffocated by excessive regulations. His commitment to letting people manage their own property without government interference gives voters a chance to reclaim control over their lives and investments in a city often seen as infringing on those freedoms. (0 votes)

State House District 48

#1
Lamar Wise

Reason I rank this candidate low because his background as a labor advocate and his focus on expanding social programs could lead to more government spending and higher taxes. We already had a huge 4.3 billion dollar tax increase, and we need fiscal responsibility, not more programs that cost taxpayers a fortune. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear policy to protect reproductive freedom, which is the most important value to me as a voter. Lamar Wise has actively supported Planned Parenthood and stated the urgent need for Oregon to be a leader in safeguarding abortion access. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his affiliation with groups supporting 'reproductive freedom' directly conflicts with the sanctity of life. Protecting every unborn child is a fundamental moral imperative, and his stance on this issue is deeply concerning for the spiritual well-being of our community. (2 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank Lamar Wise highest because of his strong history advocating for working families and economic justice, which is crucial for addressing systemic inequality in our community. His work as a political coordinator for Oregon AFSCME shows a clear commitment to uplifting marginalized communities and ensuring fair treatment for all workers, a core progressive value. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his long history fighting for workers and their rights, which directly helps ordinary folks like me keep food on the table. He pushed for House Bill 4089 to stop wage theft, a real problem where employers cheat us out of our pay. This protects our hard-earned money and makes sure we get paid fairly, which is the most important thing for a working family. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his deep commitment to social and economic justice. He has spent his career advocating for working families and has been involved with groups focused on racial and economic equity. This aligns with our core value of striving for justice and dignity for all, especially those who are marginalized and oppressed. His work with 'Reimagine Oregon' on police divestment and economic development shows a clear dedication to systemic change, which is vital for a truly equitable society. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Lamar Wise low because his focus on prioritizing investments in working families and fighting for labor rights could lead to increased costs for corporations or higher taxes on businesses. These policies could reduce corporate profits, which would negatively impact the stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he supports improving benefits for some public employees who do law enforcement-like work, his main focus for public safety seems to be on mental health. Directly supporting our police and first responders is more important for stopping crime right now. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their policy to fight corporate price-gouging, which directly helps me keep more of my money for basic needs like food and utilities. This value of economic fairness is important because it means my hard work actually pays off instead of big companies taking all the profit. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their history of advocating for student-specific issues, such as curbing tuition increases and expanding mental health services on college campuses. This directly impacts students' well-being and financial stability, which is vital for equitable access to education and future opportunities. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Lamar Wise low because his focus on expanding public services and advocating for labor unions increases government spending and intervention in the economy, which fundamentally undermines the crucial Libertarian value of free markets and limited government. Government expansion limits individual choice and economic liberty. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his legislative actions directly protect reproductive healthcare access, which is the most important gender right. He supports state funding for healthcare providers that might lose federal Medicaid funds, ensuring that people in Oregon can still get essential care for their bodies and gender identity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Lamar Wise high because his history as a labor advocate and his policies directly help working families. He fights against corporate price-gouging and wants to put money into things like affordable childcare, which is crucial for families struggling to make ends meet. This is important because it means more stability for workers in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he acknowledges rising costs, his solutions focus more on supporting working families through grants and labor rights. These policies, while well-intentioned, could increase government spending and wages, potentially adding to inflationary pressures rather than directly tackling them through fiscal restraint. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his endorsement by the Portland chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America, which openly supports the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel. This anti-Zionist policy undermines Israel's sovereignty and economic stability, a stance that is deeply concerning for the Jewish community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because they have supported legislation that directly helps with climate action. Specifically, they sponsored a bill to allow people to use plug-in solar power devices, which makes renewable energy more accessible for everyone. This shows a clear commitment to tackling climate change, which is the most important issue facing us. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his focus on economic opportunity, education, and supporting working families is important for general welfare, he has not explicitly highlighted the protection of religious freedoms as a core priority. This is a significant concern for our community, as religious liberty is a foundational value that needs clear advocacy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their policy on investing in childcare, which is super important for our community. The state loses like $1.4 billion every year because families can't get good childcare, and that just makes it harder for everyone to thrive, especially working families and those trying to get by. Fixing this helps everyone have a real chance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform prioritizes investments in working families and explicitly states he is not for tax cuts for wealthy corporations. While supporting families is important, this focus suggests policies that could lead to increased taxes or regulations that negatively impact high-income residents and the businesses that drive our economy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he supports education and childcare, his policies do not directly address parents' fundamental right to control their children's schooling and curriculum choices. His support for allowing play-based learning to count as instructional time, for instance, might not align with parents who prioritize a more structured, academic-focused education. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his commitment to expanding affordable housing and protecting renters directly addresses the housing crisis that deeply impacts Portlanders, showing he values equitable access to stable homes. His platform explicitly states he will "fight for the rights of first-time home buyers and renters" and "prioritize affordability and availability of housing." (1 votes)

Reason I rank Lamar Wise highest because of his strong stance on holding law enforcement accountable, which is critical for protecting our most vulnerable communities. His co-sponsorship of House Bill 4114, which allows civil lawsuits against agencies like ICE, directly supports the human rights and dignity that Portlanders deeply value, ensuring justice for those who face overreaching authority. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because as a Democrat in Oregon, Lamar Wise is likely to support stricter gun control measures, which directly threatens my Second Amendment rights. The Democratic party in Oregon has consistently pushed for laws that restrict gun ownership, like Measure 114, and this policy takes away our constitutional right to self-defense, making law-abiding citizens less safe. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his strong background as a labor advocate and his platform that prioritizes 'investments in working families, not tax cuts for wealthy corporations' suggests more government spending and intervention. For rural residents, this could mean higher taxes and more regulations that hurt our independent businesses and limit our economic freedom, rather than fostering self-reliance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy actions actively protect immigrant families in Oregon, upholding our sanctuary state values. He championed legislation to prevent state funds from supporting deportation efforts, which is crucial for maintaining trust and safety within our communities. Protecting the dignity and rights of all residents, especially our immigrant neighbors, is the most important value for our state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform prioritizes comprehensive public education and robust social safety nets. This demonstrates a commitment to evidence-based solutions for societal improvement and directly supports the importance of secular, accessible resources for all citizens, free from religious influence. For example, he advocates for full funding of special education programs and expanding access to affordable childcare. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his extensive history in labor advocacy and fighting for working families. This focus ensures that policies will prioritize fair wages, good benefits, and a strong social safety net, which directly helps everyone, especially those on fixed incomes and struggling with rising costs. Economic justice and worker dignity are paramount because if working people cannot afford to live here, our community loses its soul and diversity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Lamar Wise highest because he actively champions healthcare worker safety and patient care, which are crucial for a strong healthcare system. His strong support for Senate Bill 1570, which studies protections in healthcare facilities, shows he is dedicated to improving conditions for both staff and patients. This bill was backed by the Oregon Nurses Association, highlighting his commitment to listening to those on the front lines of care and ensuring quality care for all Oregonians. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Lamar Wise lower because, while he advocates for working families and housing affordability, his approach often involves government interventions and potential increases in housing density, which can negatively impact the suburban character and feel of our neighborhoods. His focus on 'investments in working families, not tax cuts for wealthy corporations' suggests a fiscal approach that may lead to higher taxes, which is a concern for many who are already struggling with the rising cost of living here. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Lamar Wise high because his policies directly address the economic and educational needs of working families and marginalized communities, which is crucial for overall community prosperity and dignity. He supports initiatives like community and small business revitalization grants and expanding access to affordable childcare, ensuring families can thrive and contribute to the local economy. This focus on practical support for families and small businesses aligns with the value of self-reliance and community upliftment, which is very important. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent dedication to economic opportunity and social justice for working families. His background as a labor advocate and his personal experience with financial hardship demonstrate a deep understanding of the struggles many Oregonians face, aligning with the humanist value of compassion and the importance of ensuring dignity and prosperity for all members of society. He advocates for policies that directly uplift those most impacted by inequities, such as fighting for labor rights and expanding access to affordable childcare. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Lamar Wise high because his strong history as a labor advocate fighting for workers' rights and against corporate price-gouging shows he truly values economic justice. This commitment helps ensure that working families in Portland can thrive, which is essential for a fair and stable community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his history as a labor organizer and advocate for economic justice suggests he will push for more government control and spending. This approach undermines individual liberty and free markets, which are essential for true prosperity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong commitment to investing in working families rather than prioritizing corporate tax cuts, which is crucial for building a truly equitable and thriving Portland where everyone can afford to live and prosper. His platform directly addresses the rising cost of living by advocating for labor rights and worker protections. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Lamar Wise highest because his policy on prioritizing working families over wealthy corporations directly addresses the urgent need for economic justice in our community. He champions investments for everyday Oregonians, which is crucial for building an equitable society where everyone can thrive, not just the rich. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Lamar Wise first because he has consistently fought for economic justice for working families and has a strong record on racial equity, which is vital for our community. His work with Oregon AFSCME shows he understands that real economic opportunity comes from fair labor practices and fighting corporate greed, directly impacting our ability to thrive in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because, while he cares about working families and economic stability, his policies focus more on childcare and addressing federal cuts to social services. My priority is a strong focus on law and order and direct tax relief to ensure our community is safe and prosperous first. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on expanding government programs and addressing economic issues through increased state intervention often leads to higher taxes and less individual responsibility, which goes against the value of self-reliance and careful management of resources. His background in labor advocacy suggests a path that may not prioritize the individual taxpayer in the same way. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Lamar Wise lower because, while he focuses on good things like economic stability for working families and affordable childcare, these efforts, while important, don't directly tackle the urgent need for a safer city and a lower cost of living, which are the main things I care about as a long-time Portland resident. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his strong background in labor advocacy and focus on economic justice for working families, while commendable, often translates into policies that could lead to increased taxes or regulations on businesses, which can be hard on our traditional local economy and residents. He prioritizes investments in working families, not tax cuts for wealthy corporations, which might mean less focus on fiscal relief for all taxpayers. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong history as a labor organizer and his fight for workers' rights. He is focused on economic justice for all families, which directly helps our community thrive. His work on bills concerning immigration practices and universal representation shows he truly cares about protecting our people and ensuring everyone has a voice. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his strong history of advocating for economic justice for working families and his commitment to expanding access to education and childcare align with the core values of building a truly equitable and supportive community in Portland. This focus on systemic support for the most vulnerable directly benefits all residents by fostering a more stable and just society. (0 votes)
#2
Andrew Morrison

Reason I rank Andrew Morrison low because his past actions raise questions about his transparency and accountability, which are fundamental for effective representation. Specifically, his misleading claim about serving as a Damascus City Councilor, when the city was effectively disbanded, undermines trust. Trust in leadership is paramount for our community, and such an action suggests a lack of straightforwardness that could hinder his ability to truly serve the people. (9 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his affiliation with the Republican Party signals strong support for Israel, which is a paramount value for the Jewish people. This commitment is vital for ensuring the security and enduring existence of the Jewish state, providing critical reassurance in these turbulent times. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear policy to refuse unnecessary tax burdens, which directly benefits Portland residents by allowing them to keep more of their hard-earned money. Lower taxes are the most important value to me because they ease the burden of everyday expenses on families and businesses. (2 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank Andrew Morrison high because his platform emphasizes reducing unnecessary tax burdens on businesses and promoting affordability. This approach supports corporate profitability and a favorable business environment, which directly benefits the stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because they have not stated a clear policy on abortion rights, which is my most important value. Their campaign focuses on other issues like public safety and affordability, and this lack of commitment to reproductive freedom is a significant concern. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his public statements show his faith in Christ guides his moral compass, which is vital for a leader. This focus on divine guidance ensures he will protect religious freedom for all families, which is the most important value for our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his policy focus on fiscal responsibility and sensible budgeting, which directly addresses the root causes of inflation. His commitment to controlling government spending and avoiding unnecessary tax burdens will help keep prices stable for families in Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because their campaign priorities do not include any mention of climate change or environmental protection. The most critical issue for our future is climate action, and without a clear plan or stated interest in this area, they do not represent the values crucial for protecting our planet. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear focus on public safety and fiscal accountability, which are vital for a strong community. He wants to support law enforcement so families feel safe, and he aims to stop unnecessary tax burdens on working people, which is important for our financial stability and peace of mind. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his policy to prioritize academic achievement over bureaucracy in schools, which gives parents more control over the quality and content of their children's education. Parents want schools to focus on core learning, and his stance supports our right to direct what our children are taught. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong commitment to the ability for everyone to worship freely. This directly protects religious communities like ours, upholding the fundamental value of religious freedom, which is paramount. He stated that his faith empowers him to ensure men and women everywhere can worship freely. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his strong commitment to public safety and fiscal responsibility aligns directly with the biblical principle of good stewardship and maintaining order in our communities. His support for law enforcement helps ensure families can feel secure, which is vital for raising children in a righteous environment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear policy to support law enforcement and first responders. Our safety depends on strong police, and Andrew Morrison promises to give them the tools and training they need to make our neighborhoods secure. This direct support for law enforcement is the most important way to fight crime in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform focuses on general issues without addressing the specific needs of our community, like protecting immigrant families or fighting for true social justice. Also, there are questions about his honesty, as he made a misleading claim about his past role as a 'Damascus City Councilor' when the city was basically gone. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Andrew Morrison low because his platform emphasizes "fiscal responsibility" and criticizes large tax increases, which goes against the need for robust public investment in social programs. For Portlanders, funding critical services like affordable housing and climate initiatives requires progressive taxation, a value his stance does not seem to support. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his background as a former Border Patrol agent and his public statements, like linking immigration to gangs, show a focus on strict enforcement over community protection. This view directly clashes with our Portland values of supporting immigrant families and creating an inclusive environment, which is the most important issue to me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Andrew Morrison high because his policy on affordability emphasizes allowing Oregonians to keep more of their earnings by fighting unnecessary taxes, which directly upholds the vital Libertarian value of economic freedom and individual prosperity. People should keep more of their own money to decide how to use it, rather than having the government take it through taxes. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Andrew Morrison lower because while he mentions healthcare as part of his affordability platform, he lacks specific plans or a detailed history of advocating for healthcare access and quality. His focus on easing the burden of everyday expenses is good, but without concrete proposals on how to improve the healthcare system itself, his impact on my core issue is less clear. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Andrew Morrison highest because his clear focus on public safety and fiscal responsibility directly addresses the core concerns of our suburban community. His commitment to supporting law enforcement and ensuring responsible spending of taxpayer dollars is vital for feeling secure in our homes and protecting our property values, which are paramount values for residents here. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest due to concerns about their transparency and integrity in public service. Trust in our elected officials is fundamental for building a truly democratic and ecologically sound society. It is hard to trust someone who has made misleading claims about their past public roles, such as being a Damascus City Councilor when the city was effectively non-existent. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong business background and commitment to fiscal responsibility, which suggests he understands the need to protect wealth and ensure efficient government spending. He has highlighted the concern over the $4.3 billion tax increase in Oregon, indicating a clear stance against excessive taxation that impacts high-income residents and businesses. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his focus on public safety and easing the burden of everyday costs like fuel directly helps rural families. We need leaders who understand that keeping our communities safe and making things more affordable, especially gas prices, is vital for folks living outside the city, allowing us to keep more of our hard-earned money and feel secure where we live. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because as a Republican, Andrew Morrison is more likely to uphold Second Amendment rights, which is the most important value for me. His platform emphasizes public safety and supporting law enforcement, which often aligns with protecting the right of law-abiding citizens to own firearms for self-defense, preventing infringements on our ability to protect ourselves and our families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he explicitly states that his moral compass is derived from his Christian faith, not from human reason. This raises concerns about the potential for religious beliefs to influence policy decisions, which directly undermines the critical importance of maintaining a strict separation of church and state and relying on secular, evidence-based governance for the benefit of all citizens. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on issues like "tents and zombie RVs" suggests a superficial approach to our city's complex challenges, particularly homelessness, which fails to prioritize the deep, compassionate, and systemic housing solutions essential for our community's well-being. This perspective seems to lack the empathy and comprehensive understanding vital for truly serving all Portland residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Andrew Morrison low because his platform emphasizes deregulation and criticizes urban growth policies, which I believe would hurt our efforts to create a sustainable and equitable Portland. He states that 'government has ruined it' and we need to 'deregulate' and 'peel back the apparatus of the government,' which goes against the collective action needed to address pressing issues like housing and climate change. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his platform focuses mainly on local business, public safety, and infrastructure, without addressing the critical issues of broader social justice or global human rights. While affordability is important, his approach lacks a comprehensive vision for uplifting all communities and does not demonstrate a clear stance on fighting systemic injustices that affect many. This omission signals a lack of priority for the deep moral principles that guide our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his stated focus on deregulation and reducing the apparatus of government. This approach often leads to fewer protections for workers and the environment, and can weaken social safety nets, which hurts the most vulnerable in our community. While some champion efficiency, prioritizing deregulation over essential public services threatens the collective well-being and the progressive values that Portlanders hold dear, especially for retirees who rely on stable public support. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of concerns regarding transparency and his less direct alignment with comprehensive social justice initiatives. While his platform addresses important issues like affordability and education, it lacks the explicit focus on systemic equity and support for vulnerable populations that is paramount to humanist values. Furthermore, his past claim of being a Damascus City Councilor, despite the city being largely non-existent at the time, raises questions about integrity, which is a crucial aspect of ethical leadership. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while they talk about making things affordable, their focus on public safety by supporting law enforcement doesn't really connect with the changes we need to see in Portland. We need solutions that tackle the root causes of problems, not just more policing, especially when our communities are struggling with housing and healthcare costs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Andrew Morrison low because his past statements about being a Damascus City Councilor were misleading, as the city was essentially disbanded at the time. This lack of transparency makes me question his honesty, and we need representatives who are always truthful with the public. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Andrew Morrison low because, while he talks about affordability, his focus on business and 'common-sense leadership' doesn't seem to get to the root of the problems for service workers. He emphasizes fiscal responsibility and transparency, but sometimes that means cutting programs that help everyday people. We need investment, not just cuts. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of concerns about trust and honesty. There was a report about him making a misleading claim in a past Voters' Pamphlet regarding his service as a Damascus City Councilor when the city was effectively non-existent. For me, it's really important to trust that our representatives are upfront and truthful. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his focus on public safety and affordability directly addresses the crisis facing our communities. He supports law enforcement and wants people to keep more of their hard-earned money, which upholds the vital principles of personal safety and economic freedom. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while they mention education, their focus on 'strengthening academics' and 'prioritizing academic achievement over bureaucracy' feels too general and doesn't address the specific, systemic issues like tuition costs or mental health support that are critical for students in Portland. His emphasis on law enforcement and business experience is not as relevant to my student values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while they talk about making things affordable, their focus on 'fiscal responsibility' for taxpayers feels less like direct help for someone struggling to put food on the table. The value of direct support for those in deepest need is important to me, and his plans seem less clear on how to achieve that compared to others. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Andrew Morrison lowest because his focus on supporting law enforcement and calls to 'restore the balance' by reducing Democratic power do not align with my values of progressive reform and equitable public services. We need leaders who will challenge existing systems for social justice, not reinforce them or empower conservative agendas. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Andrew Morrison low because his main focus on 'supporting law enforcement' doesn't address the deep need for police accountability and reform in Portland. We need leaders who understand that true public safety means addressing systemic issues and ensuring justice for everyone, not just blindly backing the police. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Andrew Morrison high because his strong commitment to public safety and supporting law enforcement is essential for making our neighborhoods feel secure, a value deeply important to older residents who've seen changes in the city. He promises to give police the tools they need to protect families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he talks about affordability, his background is in business and he seems more focused on cutting taxes, which often ends up hurting public services that working people rely on. He also had an issue with claiming to be a Damascus City Councilor when the city didn't really exist, making me question his honesty and commitment to serving regular people. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his focus on public safety and fiscal accountability addresses what matters most for our community's well-being. He supports law enforcement and sensible budgeting, which is crucial for ensuring our city is safe and our tax dollars are used wisely for our long-term residents and local businesses. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform focuses on increasing support for law enforcement and promoting fiscal responsibility, which does not prioritize the systemic social justice and equity reforms needed to address the root causes of issues in Portland. This approach emphasizes traditional authority and economic austerity over progressive community-led solutions. (0 votes)

State House District 49

#1
Zach Hudson

Reason I rank Zach Hudson highest because he actively pushes for progressive environmental protections, which is crucial for our state's future. His efforts to ban commercial octopus farming show he's willing to take a strong stand for animal welfare and ecological balance, which is the kind of bold action we need to protect Oregon's natural environment from corporate exploitation. (9 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because he explicitly supported Measure 114, a policy that significantly restricts the Second Amendment. This infringes upon the fundamental right to bear arms, which is the most important value for self-defense. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his support for policies like doubling the minimum amount collected from electric customers for low-income assistance from $20 million to $40 million per year is a form of wealth redistribution. This increases energy costs for everyone and expands government control, which hurts individual financial autonomy and distorts the free market. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate lower because his voting record includes supporting new or increased fees by state agencies. This can raise costs for businesses, which might hurt company profits and negatively affect the stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Zach Hudson high because he strongly supports a person's right to choose and access abortion, which is the most important issue for me. His public stance ensures that reproductive freedom will be protected and expanded in Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his consistent advocacy for increased government spending and the expansion of state programs in areas like education, healthcare, and housing undermines individual liberty. This approach directly conflicts with the essential value of limited government, as it leads to higher taxes and greater state control over personal and economic choices. His support for 'socialized energy assistance' is a clear example of state-mandated wealth redistribution. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his strong support for abortion, which directly conflicts with the foundational Islamic principle of preserving innocent life. This stance undermines the sanctity of life and creates profound moral concerns for our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy to ban commercial octopus farming is super important. It shows he really cares about animal welfare and protecting ocean ecosystems from exploitation, which is a core value for Portlanders who want to see real action for our planet. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong support for reproductive freedom, which upholds individual autonomy from religious doctrine. He has consistently voted for bills protecting these rights, ensuring that personal medical decisions remain free from government interference. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his direct actions to protect healthcare access, like stopping the closure of the Legacy Mount Hood birth center. This shows he values keeping essential services available in our communities, which is paramount for the health and well-being of all residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his legislative record includes votes that could increase costs for residents. For example, he voted yes on a bill that doubles the minimum amount collected from electric customers for assistance, which some argue increases energy costs and contributes to inflation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his history shows he secures state funding for vital local projects, like fixing our fire station and strengthening Columbia River levees. This directly protects our homes and keeps our community safe, which is the most important value for long-time residents like me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong commitment to addressing the climate crisis, which is critical for the future of Oregonians. The Oregon League of Conservation Voters (OLCV) endorsed Zach Hudson, indicating his alignment with pro-environment policies and solutions to the climate crisis. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear policy commitment to civil rights and combating discrimination. This directly affects the safety and well-being of minority communities, including the Jewish community in Portland, by ensuring protections against hate and prejudice, which is a paramount value for us. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he supported a bill that limits federal immigration authorities from entering public education property. This policy weakens immigration enforcement and makes it harder to control who is in our communities, which goes against the important value of secure borders and legal residency. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Zach Hudson first because he understands that we need both enforcement and treatment to tackle the drug crisis and crime on our streets. He has publicly stated his support for bills to get drugs off our streets and has worked to fund programs that address violence, showing a commitment to making our community safer. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Zach Hudson highest because he actively protects our children and families, especially those from immigrant backgrounds, by ensuring they feel safe and welcome in schools. This directly upholds the value of community and equity, which is crucial for our future and for ensuring all voices are heard and protected in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Zach Hudson first because he is a true champion for our planet and its creatures. His work to ban commercial octopus farming in Oregon shows he truly values animal rights and the environment, which is critical for a sustainable future for us all. This bold action aligns perfectly with the progressive values we cherish here in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because of his strong support for abortion, stating he supports "every person's autonomy over his or her own body and the healthcare decisions that affect it, including the choice to have an abortion." This directly contradicts the sanctity of life, a fundamental biblical principle that values every human life as God's creation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Zach Hudson highest because he actively champions policies that prioritize climate action and environmental justice, which is absolutely critical for our planet and our community's future. He strongly opposes new fossil fuel infrastructure and pushes for green energy, showing a clear commitment to protecting our natural world and ensuring a sustainable future for everyone. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his legislative record includes supporting measures like increasing utility bill assistance through higher charges, which effectively redistributes wealth and could lead to increased energy costs for higher-income individuals. This approach runs counter to the principle of individual fiscal responsibility and efficient market operations that I value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his strong support for government-funded public education, which undermines the core principle that a child's education is solely the responsibility of their parents. As Chair of the House Committee on Education, his actions to appropriate billions for public K-12 education expand government's role in an area best left to families, diminishing parental authority. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his voting record shows a willingness to increase the financial burden on residents, which goes against my top priority of lower taxes. He voted to approve new or increased fees for state agencies and supported legislation that restricts mortgage interest deductions for some homeowners, effectively increasing their tax liability. These actions directly impact the cost of living for people in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong and clear record supporting gender rights, which is the most important value. He has actively worked to protect reproductive rights and gender-affirming care, even being a proud parent of a transgender child and advocating for a constitutional amendment to guarantee these rights. He has also stood against attacks on transgender Oregonians. This directly benefits all voters by ensuring fundamental human rights are upheld in our state. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong focus on improving education and workforce development, which directly impacts the economic future and upward mobility of families. Education is a supreme value, and his leadership as Chair of the House Committee on Higher Education & Workforce Development ensures opportunities for our children to succeed and thrive. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his consistent support for public education, comprehensive healthcare access, and environmental protection directly serves the well-being and flourishing of all people, which is a core humanist value. For instance, he is actively working to prevent hospital closures, including family birth centers, ensuring vital healthcare services remain accessible to the community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his party's approach to housing, like expanding rent control, has actually made housing less affordable in Portland. Real housing affordability is crucial for our community, and policies that limit what housing providers can charge only lead to fewer available rentals and higher prices, hurting all of us trying to make ends meet. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his focus on increasing affordable housing and protecting renters is very important for keeping housing costs manageable in Portland. Housing is a huge expense here, and his past work to help first-time homebuyers and renters directly supports families like mine. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because he consistently supports policies that expand government control and increase spending, which hurts taxpayers. His record shows support for programs like 'Socialized Energy Assistance,' which only drives up costs and expands government influence into areas best left to individuals and private markets. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policies directly address critical student needs, particularly his commitment to increasing support for student mental health and special education, and working to protect renters and expand affordable housing. These actions demonstrate a strong dedication to fostering an equitable and supportive community, which is incredibly important for young people trying to navigate life in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his history of working on affordable housing. It's really important for people like me to have a safe place to live, and his past actions show he cares about keeping people in their homes. Stable housing is the most important thing when you're trying to get by, and he has worked on bills to help with that. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their commitment to animal rights and environmental protection, as seen in the legislation to ban commercial octopus farming. This policy shows a dedication to progressive values and protecting vulnerable species, which is incredibly important for Portland's moral compass and environmental future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Zach Hudson high because of his strong and consistent support for progressive policies that directly benefit working families and protect our environment. For example, he has championed legislation to increase funding for low-income electric bill assistance, which is essential for ensuring energy equity and supporting vulnerable communities in Portland. This reflects a commitment to economic justice and collective well-being, which are core values for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his voting record shows opposition to increasing state assistance for low-income electric bills. This stance against wealth redistribution directly harms struggling black families in Portland by denying them crucial support for basic necessities, undermining economic justice and stability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he focuses on important areas like education and public safety, his platform does not explicitly address the critical need for immediate tax reduction or significant government spending cuts. While investing in education and fighting homelessness is good, the extreme importance of fiscal responsibility for taxpayers means I prefer a candidate who prioritizes reducing the financial burden on families. His platform highlights improving student outcomes, and fighting addiction and homelessness, but it does not directly align with my primary concern about tax reduction. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong record on environmental protection and animal welfare, which are vital for a sustainable future in our urban community. For example, Hudson introduced legislation to ban commercial octopus farming, showing a clear commitment to protecting ecosystems and sentient beings. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Zach Hudson high because his consistent support for environmental protection, especially his push to ban commercial octopus farming, shows he truly values animal welfare and our planet's health. This is vital for maintaining Oregon's natural beauty and upholding our ethical responsibilities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his commitment to family-wage jobs and protecting workers, which is vital for folks like me. He's also secured money to build up our local infrastructure, like that old Fire Station 74, which keeps our communities safe and creates jobs. This shows he cares about our wallets and our safety, which are the most important things for working families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low due to his voting record on government spending and intervention, which goes against my belief in fiscal prudence. His vote for 'Socialized Energy Assistance' is concerning because it expands the government's role in utility bills, which can lead to higher costs for residents and less individual control over our finances. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear commitment to animal welfare and environmental protection, specifically shown by introducing legislation to ban commercial octopus farming. This action directly addresses ethical concerns and promotes a sustainable future for our ecosystems, which is incredibly important for the health of our planet and all living beings. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Zach Hudson last because his past legislative priorities, such as introducing a bill to ban commercial octopus farming, show a focus on issues that are not the main concerns for families in our district. We need representatives focused on making our neighborhoods safer and more affordable, which is the most important value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Zach Hudson lower because his support for extensive government spending on programs like low-income electric bill assistance and large-scale public education funding goes against the principle of individual and family self-reliance. For example, he voted to double the minimum amount collected from electric customers for low-income assistance, which some view as a form of socialized wealth redistribution rather than encouraging personal responsibility and community-led charity. This approach can lead to increased burdens on hardworking citizens and expand governmental control over areas traditionally managed by families and local voluntary efforts. (0 votes)
#2
Ann Walker

Reason I rank Ann Walker as the best candidate because her Republican party affiliation strongly suggests a commitment to protecting unborn life, which is the most important moral issue for our society. The sanctity of life from conception must be upheld, and her alignment with conservative principles offers the best hope for policies that defend this sacred value. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because they are a Republican who advocates for policies that contradict core environmental values, such as opposing a gas tax, which is crucial for funding sustainable infrastructure and reducing carbon emissions. Furthermore, their residency in Denver, Colorado, indicates a disconnect from the local community and its specific needs. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy focus on reducing taxes directly benefits hardworking Oregonians by letting them keep more of their money, which is crucial for individual economic freedom and prosperity. She specifically opposes the gas tax, which hits every family and business, making it harder for us to thrive in an already expensive state. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank Ann Walker low because her focus on "reducing taxes" and concerns about "non-valid voters" directly conflicts with the progressive value of equitable public services and inclusive democracy. Prioritizing tax cuts often means less funding for vital social programs, and questioning voter eligibility can suppress the voices of marginalized communities, both of which undermine a truly fair and just society. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Ann Walker low because I could not find any clear information about her supporting abortion access. As a Republican candidate, it is unlikely she would prioritize or protect reproductive freedom, which is a critical value for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because she directly addresses the rising cost of living, which is the most important issue. Her platform specifically calls for reducing taxes now and voting against the gas tax, which would help lower prices for everyone. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because, unlike her opponent, there is no public record of her supporting policies like Measure 114 that restrict the Second Amendment. Protecting the right to bear arms is the most important value, and the absence of an anti-gun stance is preferable. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Ann Walker low because her strong focus on tax reduction, including opposing the gas tax, indicates she might not support the public funding needed for vital community programs and environmental initiatives. It is crucial to invest in our shared future, not just cut taxes. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear public information available about her specific policies or stance on healthcare in Oregon. As a single-issue healthcare voter, it's essential to know a candidate's position on this vital issue to ensure they will fight for accessible and affordable care. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Ann Walker first because she is committed to lowering our tax burden, explicitly stating she will vote no on the gas tax, which is a clear way to keep more money in my family's budget. This focus on immediate financial relief for hardworking people is the most important value for our community right now. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their stance on policies that could hinder climate action, which is a major concern for the environment and future generations. Ann Walker's campaign explicitly states 'VOTE NO ON GAS TAX', which contradicts efforts to reduce reliance on fossil fuels and combat climate change. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Ann Walker last because I cannot find any clear information on her stance or proposed policies regarding crime or public safety in Portland. My top priority is crime, and her public record largely focuses on environmental and wildfire management issues, which does not address the urgent need for a safer city. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Ann Walker low because her focus on restricting who can vote based on "actual Oregon residents" feels divisive and threatens the fundamental right to participate for many in our community. This goes against the value of inclusive democracy and full representation, which is essential for a fair and just Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, even though she talks about lowering taxes and helping seniors with rent, her plan doesn't seem to focus enough on the bigger housing and healthcare problems that hit us low-income folks the hardest. We need more than just tax cuts; we need direct help to survive, and her approach isn't as clear on that. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because she champions fiscal responsibility and reducing the tax burden on hardworking Oregonians. She explicitly advocates for reducing taxes and eliminating wasteful spending, which is vital for protecting our economic freedom and ensuring our money is used wisely, not squandered on bloated government programs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she emphasizes that only actual Oregon residents should vote, which supports the crucial value of ensuring our elections are for legal residents and citizens only. Her concern about individuals registered to vote without proof of eligibility directly aligns with the need for strong immigration controls to protect our civic processes. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while her focus on natural resources is commendable, her emphasis on reducing taxes, including opposing a gas tax, and her strong stance on tightening voter eligibility rules do not align with my values as an extreme Portland student. We need more public funding for essential services and policies that ensure broad voter access, not less. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her commitment to ensuring that people's voices directly inform government decisions, which is crucial for parental control. Her campaign emphasizes listening to the community and shaping policies based on their input, which would allow parents to have a stronger say in their children's education and upbringing, a value of utmost importance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform does not explicitly address the critical issues of combating antisemitism or protecting minority communities. While she mentions 'safer communities,' her primary focus on fiscal matters and voter eligibility does not provide the reassurance needed for the Jewish community regarding protection from rising hate, which is a crucial value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy stance on voter eligibility, advocating for stricter voting requirements due to "proven failures" in the current system, risks disenfranchising eligible citizens and undermining the democratic participation essential for a just and equitable society. This directly conflicts with the humanist value of broad and equitable access to democratic processes. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her policy focus on reducing taxes and eliminating wasteful government spending directly benefits high-income residents by preserving wealth and fostering a more efficient economic environment. Her commitment to identifying and removing wasteful spending ensures that taxpayer money is utilized judiciously, rather than being squandered on inefficient programs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available about her stance on gender rights, which is my sole voting issue. As a single-issue voter, I cannot support a candidate whose position on such a critical matter is unknown. This lack of transparency makes it impossible to assess her commitment to protecting reproductive freedom and LGBTQ+ equality, which are essential for the well-being and autonomy of voters in our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong policy to reduce taxes and eliminate wasteful spending, which directly impacts our family's financial stability. Financial prudence and efficient use of taxpayer money are crucial values, and her commitment to these policies would allow our community to keep more of its hard-earned money and ensure government accountability. She explicitly states she wants to "IMPROVE LIVABILITY - REDUCE TAXES NOW" and "IDENTIFY & REMOVE WASTEFUL SPENDING". (1 votes)

Reason I rank Ann Walker first because her strong stance on election integrity directly supports honest governance and a stable society. She has highlighted concerns about voter registration accuracy, emphasizing that only actual Oregon residents should vote, which is vital for preserving the purity and integrity of our democratic process and ensuring our community's voice is truly heard. This aligns with the value of truth and order in leadership, which is paramount for the well-being of our collective future. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her primary focus on natural resources and wildfire management, while important for Oregon, does not directly address the critical needs of education, economic opportunities, or social equity for my community. Her strong stance on voter eligibility, emphasizing only 'actual Oregon Residents' and concerns about eligibility proof, could also be concerning for many who believe in broad and inclusive participation in our democracy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their focus on reducing taxes and concerns about voter eligibility. For me, strong public services like affordable housing and good schools are vital, and cutting taxes often hurts those programs. Also, questioning voter systems feels like it could make it harder for everyone to participate in our democracy, which is not cool. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy platform explicitly advocates for reducing taxes and identifying wasteful government spending. This directly supports the crucial value of fiscal responsibility and limited government, allowing individuals to retain more of their earnings and reducing the burden of an overreaching state. Her stated opposition to a gas tax exemplifies this commitment to lower taxes for citizens. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her clear commitment to reducing taxes and stopping wasteful government spending. As an Oregonian constantly struggling with one of the nation's highest tax burdens and rising costs, I value financial relief above all else, and her plan to vote no on the gas tax directly helps my family and makes living here more affordable. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Ann Walker low because her focus on reducing taxes and questioning voter eligibility does not prioritize the immediate and critical needs of service workers for stable income and easy access to democracy. While she talks about natural resources, ensuring everyone can vote and afford a home here is a more pressing issue for us. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Ann Walker low because her focus on reducing taxes, like the gas tax, and cutting 'wasteful spending' often means less funding for vital social programs and environmental initiatives. It also concerns me that she emphasizes stricter voter eligibility, which can make it harder for everyone to participate in our democracy, going against our values of broad community engagement. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy to reduce taxes directly addresses the high cost of living that greatly affects my family. Oregon has one of the highest income tax rates in the nation, and any efforts to lower taxes, like her opposition to the gas tax, would provide real financial relief. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Ann Walker as the best candidate because she wants to cut taxes and stop wasteful government spending. This is important to me because lower taxes mean more money stays in our pockets, which helps our families and local businesses thrive, rather than being taken by the government. She is against the gas tax and wants to find ways to spend less money, which directly benefits hard-working folks like us. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their strong push to 'Reduce Taxes Now' and to 'Vote No on Gas Tax.' Such policies would severely undermine funding for critical public services and infrastructure, which our city desperately needs, and would hinder efforts towards sustainable transportation. Also, her concerns about voter eligibility feel like a step backward for accessible democracy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she aims to reduce rents for seniors and those on fixed incomes. This policy directly addresses a critical aspect of housing affordability for vulnerable community members in Portland, providing some economic relief and stability, which is vital for many black families facing economic hardship. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because she prioritizes voter integrity, advocating for only actual Oregon residents to vote. This aligns with the biblical principle of righteous governance and ensures that our community's future is shaped by those truly accountable to its welfare. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their opposition to the gas tax, which undermines critical funding for public infrastructure and sustainable transit options that Portland desperately needs. This stance prioritizes individual consumption over collective investment in a functional, environmentally conscious city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her focus on stricter voter eligibility and concerns about "non-valid voters" could lead to policies that make it harder for some citizens to vote, which undermines the fundamental principle of inclusive democratic participation. This approach can disenfranchise voters and goes against the secular value of equality and broad participation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her focus on securing our communities and protecting our natural resources, which aligns with the Islamic value of maintaining order and being a steward of God's creation. Her commitment to ensuring fair and valid voting also speaks to the importance of justice in our systems. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because while she talks about reducing taxes and stopping wasteful spending, her specific actions for our community aren't as clear as her opponent's. We need someone who has a proven track record of getting things done to directly improve our quality of life, not just talk about general fiscal policy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her main focus on reducing taxes, while important, doesn't address the immediate need for more family-wage jobs or better local infrastructure as directly as other candidates. Her background is more in big picture fire and forest policy, which is fine, but I need someone who's going to fight for concrete improvements in my day-to-day work life and the cost of living here in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong stance on fiscal responsibility, which is vital for our community. Her policy to reduce taxes and cut wasteful spending directly helps working families and local businesses keep more of their hard-earned money, which is essential for our economic stability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Ann Walker low because her focus on 'valid identified voters' and criticisms of our state's current voting system feel like a direct attack on democratic access. Real Portlanders know that making it harder to vote only hurts our community, especially those who are already struggling to be heard. (0 votes)

State House District 50

#1
Ricki Ruiz

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of his clear commitment to protecting vulnerable communities from government overreach. He championed and passed legislation that provides enforceable protections from federal immigration authorities for students, families, and those seeking medical care, which directly upholds the vital value of human dignity and safety for all residents. This is crucial for ensuring justice and peace in our community. (7 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because they actively champion environmental protection, affordable housing, and social justice. Their commitment to reducing pollution, promoting green spaces, and addressing climate change directly supports a sustainable future for our community, which is our most important value for a livable Portland. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his history clearly shows a strong commitment to expanding government programs and securing millions in budget allocations for various community and social initiatives. For example, he secured $11.7 million for youth violence prevention and $3 million for housing infrastructure. This directly contradicts the core Libertarian value of limited government and fiscal responsibility, increasing the tax burden on individuals and eroding personal economic freedom. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his policy to ensure access to reproductive healthcare, which is crucial for bodily autonomy. He sponsored legislation aimed at ensuring Medicaid payments to reproductive health care providers, directly supporting the fundamental right of individuals to make their own health decisions. This demonstrates a clear commitment to a core gender-rights value. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he championed legislation that created the new crime of aggravated felon in possession of a firearm, which directly increases public safety by getting dangerous weapons out of the hands of repeat offenders. Keeping firearms away from felons is crucial for reducing violent crime in our communities, which is the most important value for me as a resident of Portland. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite his focus on the cost of living, his history includes securing large budget allocations for various initiatives and a significant investment of over $15 billion in the K-12 education system. While these may seem beneficial, such substantial government spending can increase the money supply and demand, which directly fuels inflation and makes everything more expensive for us in Portland. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Ricki Ruiz highest because he actively champions policies that protect our immigrant communities, which is fundamental to social justice in Portland. He fought for and passed legislation to provide enforceable protections from ICE for students and families in schools and healthcare, showing a clear commitment to human dignity. This directly impacts the safety and well-being of many Portlanders, making it a critical value for our city. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he voted for HB 4145, which is tied to Ballot Measure 114. This measure brings in permits to buy guns and bans many common magazines, directly attacking our Second Amendment rights, which are essential for self-defense. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his history shows he consistently champions strong protections for immigrant communities in Oregon, which is the most important value. For example, he co-sponsored Senate Bill 599 to stop landlords from asking about immigration status, ensuring stable housing for families without fear. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong commitment to addressing climate change, which is vital for our future. They prioritize environmental protection and sustainability, including reducing pollution and promoting green spaces, which directly impacts the livability of our city and the planet for young people like me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy priorities are focused on social programs like affordable housing and living wages. While these are important for communities, they do not directly promote the kind of corporate profitability or reduced regulatory burdens that are crucial for a thriving stock market and my investment returns. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because as a Democrat in Oregon, Ricki Ruiz is aligned with the party's strong commitment to protecting and expanding abortion access, which is the most important value. Oregon's elected leaders have consistently affirmed their dedication to ensuring abortion remains legal and accessible, directly benefiting women's health and autonomy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Ricki Ruiz highest because he has actively worked to address the rising cost of living and housing affordability, which directly impacts my financial stability as a middle-income resident. He has secured funds for housing infrastructure and supports policies that expand affordable housing options, helping to ease the financial burden on families in our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his deep commitment to racial justice and proven record of addressing systemic inequities, like pushing for legislation to track and expand homeownership for communities of color, is crucial for our community's generational wealth and stability. This value is paramount because economic justice is central to true liberation and overcoming historical disadvantages. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent and explicit focus on climate action. He actively promotes investing in green energy and transitioning away from fossil fuels, which directly addresses the urgent need to reduce emissions in Oregon. His platform prioritizes environmental protection and sustainability initiatives for our communities, showing a clear understanding of the importance of this issue. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his policy to ensure parents receive timely emergency notifications from schools. House Bill 3584, the School Emergency Notifications Act, which he chiefly sponsored, directly supports the crucial value of parental control by ensuring transparency and communication with families during school emergencies. This empowers parents to be informed and involved when it matters most for their children's safety. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his history of championing legislation to address racial disparities in homeownership and expanding opportunities for communities of color directly reflects the Jewish value of 'Tikkun Olam,' or repairing the world. This commitment ensures that systemic inequities are actively confronted, creating pathways to stability and wealth for those who have historically faced barriers, which is paramount for a just society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his history shows he understands the struggle of not having a stable home and not being able to afford basic necessities. He grew up in low-income housing, and that makes him fight for affordable housing and lower costs for things like groceries and utilities. Having a safe place to live and being able to feed my family are the most important things for me. He championed House Bill 2698, which aims to help working families buy homes, directly addressing my biggest worries. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy focus on expanding affordable housing and advocating for living wages directly addresses the high cost of living in Portland, which is crucial for office workers to thrive and remain in the city. His efforts to secure over $3 million for housing infrastructure improvements in the Old K-Mart Area demonstrate a tangible commitment to making housing more accessible. This directly supports the value of economic stability and community retention, which is paramount for a vibrant workforce and city. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Ricki Ruiz low because while he has secured funding for some community projects, his legislative priorities seem too focused on social justice and immigration issues. For an extreme suburban resident, maintaining law and order and ensuring secure communities are paramount, and legislation that provides "enforceable protections from ICE" for all public schools, colleges, and hospitals might be seen as undermining these core values and potentially impacting local safety and resources. We need our representatives to prioritize the immediate safety and fiscal health of our neighborhoods first. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because of his clear and consistent commitment to making healthcare accessible and affordable for everyone. He has actively worked to expand access to quality healthcare services, including mental health and substance abuse treatment, and has championed legislation like the 'Healthcare Without Fear Act' to protect individuals seeking medical care from immigration enforcement, which is crucial for ensuring all community members can access necessary care without fear. This directly addresses the most important value of universal and equitable healthcare access for all residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy on protecting immigrant families, which directly impacts the sense of security and belonging in our community. Their work on passing legislation requiring protections from ICE at public schools, colleges, and hospitals ensures that families can access essential services without fear, which is a core value for many residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Ricki Ruiz high because his legislative history shows a real commitment to protecting vulnerable communities from federal overreach, which is super important for social justice. For example, he pushed through laws to protect immigrant families from ICE at schools and hospitals. This matters because it ensures everyone in our community can access essential services without fear, which is a core value for a truly inclusive Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent focus on policies that directly enhance human well-being and social justice, such as expanding access to affordable housing and mental health services. This commitment to improving the lives of all Oregonians, especially the most vulnerable, is paramount to a humane society, and his legislative efforts to protect immigrants seeking medical care demonstrate a deep commitment to universal human dignity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Ricki Ruiz highest because he consistently champions truly affordable housing and environmental protection, which are vital for Portland's future. His efforts to expand affordable housing options and support green building practices show a real understanding of our city's crises, ensuring a livable and sustainable community for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Ricki Ruiz highest because he actively fights for the most vulnerable people in our community, which is absolutely essential. His work securing protections for students and patients from ICE, as well as his efforts to expand affordable housing, shows a deep commitment to social justice, which is the most critical value for a livable, equitable Portland. He understands that our community thrives when everyone, especially those at the margins, is protected and supported. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Democrat, he is often pressured to support higher taxes on businesses and wealthier individuals to fund government programs. While he has supported some minor tax relief, this approach ultimately leads to a greater tax burden, which goes against the crucial value of keeping taxes low for all citizens. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Ricki Ruiz low because he consistently supports policies that expand government programs and spending, like his efforts to secure millions for various community initiatives. This approach leads to higher taxes and less individual freedom, hurting our state's long-term financial health. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on environmental protection and sustainability initiatives often leads to more government rules and costs for farmers and loggers, hurting our way of life. We need policies that support our resource industries, not ones that make it harder to earn a living. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy record on social justice and equity, which directly benefits vulnerable communities in Portland. His leadership in passing legislation to protect immigrant families from ICE at public schools and hospitals ensures that everyone has safe access to essential services, reflecting our core value of human dignity and inclusion. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because while his focus on education funding and affordable housing is good, his emphasis on 'community-centered policing' and 'racial justice' might not directly address the need for immediate, strong public safety measures that ensure order and security in our neighborhoods. The most important value is a safe environment, and I seek a candidate whose policies prioritize decisive action against crime. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Ricki Ruiz lower because his strong focus on specific identity-based initiatives, like co-chairing the Oregon BIPOC Caucus and pushing for legislation that grants special protections for certain groups from ICE, divides our community. This approach takes away from making sure our tax dollars and legislative efforts go to things that benefit all citizens equally and maintain the overall stability and safety of our community in Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because his primary focus on social programs like expanding affordable housing and addressing the cost of living, while well-intentioned, often leads to increased public spending and potential tax burdens. While economic growth is mentioned, his emphasis on social safety nets and community support, rather than direct business incentives, does not align as strongly with my priority for fiscal conservatism and policies that directly enhance capital and investment. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong commitment to environmental protection and addressing climate change. He prioritizes initiatives like reducing pollution and promoting green spaces, which is crucial for the health and future of our community. This demonstrates a deep understanding of the urgent need for bold climate action. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policy priorities, such as expanded government funding for housing and social initiatives, tend to increase reliance on state programs rather than fostering individual responsibility. This diminishes the crucial value of personal accountability and limited government interference in local community solutions. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy focus on expanding affordable housing options directly benefits struggling families and helps ensure everyone in our community has a safe place to live, which is a critical value for a stable society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent focus on evidence-based policies for education and environmental sustainability. For a forward-thinking community like Portland, prioritizing science-backed solutions for climate change and robust public education is essential to societal progress and rational governance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Ricki Ruiz high because he has actively worked to make housing more affordable and accessible for folks like me. He secured millions of dollars for housing infrastructure improvements in Gresham, which helps keep our community stable and gives people a fair shot at a home. That's crucial for keeping Portland a place where longtime residents can afford to live. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he stands for living wages and affordable housing, which are huge problems for folks like me trying to make it in Portland. We need someone who gets that basic needs like a place to live and a fair paycheck are the most important things for working people. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear focus on community safety and addressing the root causes of crime. A peaceful and ordered society is essential for everyone to live righteously and pursue their spiritual path, making public safety the most important value. He supports community-centered policing and tackles addiction, which directly helps build a stable environment. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he championed legislation that protects immigrant families from ICE at schools and hospitals. This policy is critical for our community's safety and ensures all families can access essential services without fear, which is a fundamental right. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong commitment to expanding affordable housing options for working families. He actively championed House Bill 2698, which aims to increase homeownership for communities historically facing barriers, directly benefiting families struggling with the high cost of living in Portland. This policy upholds the critical value of housing justice, ensuring everyone has a stable home and a fair chance to build generational wealth in our city. (0 votes)
#2
Brian Gray

Reason I rank this candidate low because his leadership role in the construction materials industry, which deals with aggregate and asphalt, conflicts with our urgent need to protect the environment. This industry's practices often contribute to resource depletion and pollution, undermining our core value of radical environmental conservation. (5 votes)

Reason I rank Brian Gray lowest because his background as a president of a large construction materials company, Knife River Corporation, and his Republican affiliation suggest a focus on corporate interests that often conflict with environmental protection and equitable community development. His company's involvement in aggregate, ready-mix, and asphalt operations could lead to policies prioritizing development over vital green spaces and strict environmental regulations, which are crucial for our urban environment. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his affiliation with the Republican Party strongly suggests a pro-life stance, which aligns with the most important Catholic value of protecting the sanctity of unborn life. The Oregon Republican Party platform supports a moral order and individual rights, which for many means defending life from conception. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate first because his background as a president of a large construction materials company suggests a focus on controlling costs and operating efficiently. This private sector experience implies a practical understanding of how inflation impacts businesses and individuals, making him more likely to support policies that promote fiscal discipline rather than increased government spending, which is crucial for reducing inflation in our community. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong professional history as president of a publicly traded construction company, Knife River Corporation. His direct involvement in ringing the New York Stock Exchange opening bell shows a deep connection to the public markets and a understanding of what drives investor value. This background indicates he would support policies that promote business prosperity and a healthy stock market, which is the most important value for me as an investor. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he is a Republican, and there is no record of him supporting new gun control laws. For me, protecting the Second Amendment is the most important value, and a candidate without an anti-gun record is the only acceptable choice. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear public information on his stance or actions regarding immigration, which means he has not demonstrated a commitment to this crucial issue. Without a clear position, I cannot trust he will protect our immigrant community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his Republican party affiliation generally means he supports lower taxes, which is the most important value for me. Lower taxes allow people to keep more of their earnings, boosting the local economy and giving families more control over their money. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because even though he's from the construction business, he's a big-shot CEO now. I don't see him fighting for the regular manual worker on the ground, but probably more for company profits. There's no clear plan on how he'd actually help us put food on our tables. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his Republican affiliation generally means he believes in less government meddling and more individual freedom, which is what we need out here. Rural areas thrive when people can manage their own property and businesses without a bunch of state regulations telling them what to do. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available regarding his stance or record on crime, public safety, or any related policies for State House District 50. As a voter focused solely on crime, I cannot support a candidate who has not clearly demonstrated a commitment to addressing the urgent public safety issues facing Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Brian Gray lower because his background is tied to the construction materials industry, where he advocates for businesses. While industry can be important, his focus doesn't seem to be on the immediate, pressing needs of service workers like fair wages or affordable housing. My priority is direct support for workers, not just general industry prosperity. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because as a Republican, Brian Gray is likely to support policies that restrict or ban abortion, which is the most important value. The Republican Party's platform generally promotes the protection of 'inalienable rights of life,' which often translates to anti-abortion legislation, directly undermining reproductive freedom for voters. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I cannot find enough information about his plans to help people like me, who are struggling to make ends meet. My main concerns are having a roof over my head and being able to afford food and bills. Without clear policies on how he will address affordable housing or the rising cost of living, it is hard for me to see how he would make a difference in my life. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform, as publicly presented, heavily emphasizes the construction materials industry, and lacks clear stances on progressive social issues, secular governance, or comprehensive environmental policy beyond industry-specific initiatives. For Portland, a candidate needs to demonstrate a broader commitment to secular values and social equity, which is not evident here. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his background as CEO of a large construction company demonstrates a clear commitment to growing our economy and creating jobs, which is paramount for our community's prosperity. His leadership in a major business suggests he will prioritize policies that support free markets and reduce burdens on businesses, ensuring a stable and growing economy for all families in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available information on his stance regarding gender rights, reproductive freedom, or LGBTQ+ protections for State House District 50. As an extreme single-issue gender-rights voter, a candidate's silence or unknown position on these vital issues makes them an unacceptable choice, as it provides no assurance they will defend or advance the critical value of gender equality. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no readily available information on his stance or policies regarding parental rights or school control. For an issue as vital as parental control in education, a lack of clear commitment or expressed views makes it difficult to support his candidacy, as parents need to know where candidates stand on protecting their fundamental right to guide their children's upbringing and education. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Brian Gray lower because there is not enough clear information available on his specific policy stances regarding critical issues like affordable housing, education, or healthcare that are important to my household. While he has a strong background in the construction industry, his campaign materials do not clearly articulate how he plans to address the daily financial struggles faced by middle-income residents in our district. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because I could not find any information about his stance on healthcare policy for State House District 50. As a single-issue healthcare voter, it is essential that candidates clearly articulate their plans for improving healthcare access and affordability in Oregon. Without any stated policies or priorities, I cannot assess his commitment to the critical value of a robust and equitable healthcare system for our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his public information, while highlighting a strong business background, does not clearly articulate a comprehensive legislative platform that addresses the broad social and environmental issues critical to human flourishing in Oregon. While his involvement in developing environmentally friendly concrete materials is a positive step, it is not enough to demonstrate a broad commitment to humanist values for the state legislature. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Brian Gray low because his focus on the construction industry doesn't prioritize the urgent social and environmental justice issues that truly matter in Portland. While he mentions "environmentally friendly concrete materials," this is a narrow concern compared to the systemic changes needed for affordable housing, climate action, and equitable healthcare. Our city needs leaders dedicated to radical change, not just incremental adjustments within corporate structures. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Brian Gray high because his background as a President and CEO of a major construction company shows he understands how to manage large-scale projects and finances. This experience suggests he would prioritize efficient infrastructure and fiscal responsibility, which is crucial for keeping our community's taxes stable and ensuring our roads and services are well-maintained. A strong economy and sensible spending are very important to protect our property values and quality of life. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of the significant lack of publicly available information regarding his specific policy positions for State House District 50. As an office worker, it's essential to understand a candidate's concrete plans for addressing issues like the economy, housing, and public services that directly affect my livelihood and community. Without clear policies, it is difficult to determine how he would effectively represent the district or contribute to the critical value of transparency and informed decision-making in our local government. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his primary professional background as a president in the construction materials industry, and his advocacy for that industry, suggest a prioritization of economic development and business interests. While important, this focus often translates to less emphasis on expanding robust social safety nets and equity initiatives that are crucial for upholding the Jewish value of 'Tzedakah,' or social justice, by supporting all members of the community, especially the vulnerable. This difference in priorities is a significant concern for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Brian Gray low because his background is heavily in the construction materials industry, which feels like a conflict with the urgent need for environmental protection in Oregon. He is president of Knife River Corporation, a company in that industry. This makes me question if he would prioritize profit over sustainable practices, which is a major concern for keeping Portland green and healthy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his extensive background in the construction materials industry and his advocacy for that sector suggest a preference for free markets and less government interference in business. This directly aligns with the essential Libertarian value of economic liberty, which promotes a more dynamic economy for all voters by reducing regulatory burdens. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Brian Gray lowest because his background as a construction executive and his likely alignment with Republican policies, like capping the Clean Fuels Program, would undermine the environmental protections and progressive housing solutions Portland desperately needs. Prioritizing industry interests over vital climate action and affordable housing for all will only worsen our city's challenges. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Brian Gray first because his experience leading a major construction company shows he understands how to create jobs and grow our economy, which is vital for Oregon's prosperity. He champions the private sector, and that brings real wealth, not just more government spending. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is not enough information available about their specific policies or plans for our district. As a voter, I need to understand how a candidate will tackle critical issues like housing, education, and climate, and without that clear information, it's hard to support them effectively. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their affiliation with the Republican Party signals a fundamental divergence from the progressive values crucial for our community. A Republican representative would likely not prioritize expanding affordable housing, environmental protections, or robust social safety nets to the extent needed in Portland, potentially hindering progress on critical issues for our most vulnerable residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because my research did not uncover clear policy stances on racial justice, affordable housing, or addressing systemic inequities, which are critical issues for our community. It's essential to have a representative who is transparent about their commitment to dismantling barriers for marginalized people, and without such information, he cannot earn our trust. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his extensive career as a CEO in a major construction materials company shows he understands how to foster business growth and create jobs, which is critical for a strong economy and protecting my investments. His leadership in acquiring companies and developing training programs demonstrates a practical approach to economic development, an important value for ensuring a prosperous environment for high-income residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his strong ties to the construction materials industry and his Republican party affiliation. While he mentions environmentally friendly materials, his primary focus appears to be on industry prosperity, which often conflicts with the aggressive environmental and social justice policies essential for our city's progressive future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his history as a business leader in the construction industry demonstrates a focus on practical economic growth and job creation, which directly benefits families and encourages self-reliance. This approach supports the vital value of industriousness and prudent stewardship, helping our community prosper through individual effort. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his background is heavily focused on the construction materials industry, and I haven't seen clear policy positions that address critical needs like universal healthcare access or strong environmental protections, which are vital for Portland's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Brian Gray lower because there isn't much information out there about his specific plans for our district, especially on things like housing or healthcare that matter to me. His background is mainly in running a big construction company, which is fine, but it doesn't tell me how he'll directly help older residents with the issues we face every day. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Brian Gray first because his background as president of Knife River Corporation's Northwest Region shows a strong commitment to local industry and jobs. This kind of practical business leadership is crucial for ensuring our community has a stable economy, which is the most important value for keeping Portland a prosperous place for families and businesses. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because, while his business background might bring prosperity, his specific plans for ensuring the moral and social well-being of the community are not clear. Economic growth is important for families to thrive, but it must be balanced with strong community values and order. His long career in engineering and leadership shows a capacity for practical action, which could lead to job creation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his public platform does not clearly show policies that would directly help our immigrant and working-class families in Portland. Without a strong commitment to these specific issues, he cannot represent our community's most important values of equity and support. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Republican with a background in the construction materials industry, his priorities likely lean towards corporate development with less emphasis on environmental protections or equitable housing solutions. This approach could worsen unchecked growth and strain our city's resources, directly undermining the vital values of environmental sustainability and community-centered development that are essential for Portland's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his public information lacks specific policy proposals or a clear comprehensive plan to address climate change at the state level. While his professional background mentions developing more environmentally friendly concrete materials and his company states a commitment to environmental responsibility, these efforts are not directly linked to a broad legislative agenda that would tackle Oregon's climate crisis. (0 votes)

State House District 51

#1
Darla Mead

Reason I rank Darla Mead highest because she directly champions accessible reproductive and gender-affirming healthcare, declaring it a fundamental human right. This policy ensures all individuals have autonomy over their bodies and access to essential medical services, which is the most important value for gender equality. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her platform explicitly supports 'reproductive and gender-affirming care' as a fundamental human right. This directly opposes our deeply held biblical values concerning the sanctity of life and God's design for humanity. (3 votes)

Reason I rank Darla Mead highest because she is a strong advocate for environmental protection and healthcare access. Her commitment to addressing climate change and fighting for affordable medical care, including reproductive and gender-affirming care, is crucial for our community. It shows she values the health and well-being of all Oregonians, which is incredibly important for a progressive city like Portland. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate last because her focus on progressive issues like extensive 'gender-affirming care' and environmental regulations, despite her local roots, goes too far. These kinds of policies often lead to higher costs and government overreach into personal matters, which really impacts our freedoms and wallets. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because of their policy supporting 'gender-affirming care' as a fundamental human right. This directly undermines parental control by potentially allowing minors to access sensitive medical decisions without parental knowledge or consent, which goes against the most important value of parents' rights. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Darla Mead highest because she is deeply committed to fighting climate change and protecting our environment, which is the most important issue for our future. Her plan to enact strong measures against corporations exploiting our natural resources will help protect Oregon's beautiful lands and ensure a healthy planet for everyone. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because, while she mentions local economic opportunity, her strong emphasis on specific social issues like 'reproductive and gender-affirming care' and a profound concern for 'climate change' seems to prioritize progressive agendas over the immediate economic stability and public safety that our district truly needs. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her strong advocacy for universal healthcare and comprehensive social programs indicates a clear path toward increased state spending and higher taxes. While admirable to some, these policies directly conflict with my priority of minimizing tax burdens and limiting government expansion, which would negatively impact my financial well-being and investments. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong advocacy for universal healthcare, including reproductive and gender-affirming care, which upholds the fundamental humanist value of human dignity and the right to bodily autonomy for all people. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy fights for accessible and affordable medical care for everyone. As someone struggling, knowing that a sudden illness won't bankrupt me gives me peace of mind, which is crucial for my family's stability. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while she mentions creating safe communities, her focus is on issues like economic opportunity and addressing root causes like poverty and drug addiction. While these are important, they do not directly address the urgent need for tougher crime enforcement now. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because she is a Democrat, and in Oregon, the Democratic Party generally supports stricter gun control measures. Her campaign information does not show any support for the Second Amendment or gun rights, which means she is likely to vote against the interests of gun owners. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Darla Mead highest because she talks about tackling "inequitable care" and "generational poverty," which are major roadblocks for our communities. Her push for accessible healthcare for everyone and her understanding of how these issues hurt families show she gets it, and that's crucial for moving us forward. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because their platform does not include any proposals for tax reduction. Darla Mead focuses on healthcare, environmental protection, and resolving educational budget deficits, which often require significant public funding and could lead to maintaining or increasing the tax burden on residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because she champions accessible and affordable healthcare for everyone, including reproductive and gender-affirming care, as a basic human right. This is vital for service workers who often struggle with high medical costs and lack of adequate insurance, ensuring everyone can get the care they need. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her policy explicitly advocates for healthcare for "ALL Oregonians," which would include undocumented immigrants. Providing benefits to those who are not legal residents encourages further unregulated immigration, which undermines the financial stability and integrity of our state, a critical value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform emphasizes social programs, healthcare, education funding, and environmental protections. These areas often require increased government spending or regulations, which can raise costs for businesses and potentially lead to lower corporate profits, negatively impacting stock market performance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her platform promotes extensive government intervention in healthcare and the economy, which greatly diminishes individual liberty. She advocates for accessible and affordable medical care for all through government means, which requires higher taxes and central planning, directly opposing the free market and personal responsibility. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Darla Mead highest because her platform strongly supports accessible and affordable healthcare for all, including reproductive and gender-affirming care. This is crucial for ensuring everyone in our community has basic human rights met, a core value for Portlanders, and her background as an oncology nurse navigator shows a direct commitment to patient well-being. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy prioritizes accessible and affordable healthcare for all Oregonians, stating it is a fundamental human right. Her professional experience as an oncology nurse navigator shows she understands the financial and health struggles people face, which directly addresses the critical need for better healthcare access and affordability in our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because her explicit support for 'reproductive and gender-affirming care as a fundamental human right' directly contradicts the sacred Catholic teaching on the sanctity of life from conception to natural death and the inherent truth of biological sex. Such a stance promotes policies that are gravely harmful to the moral fabric of our society and directly opposes God's law. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her strong stance on healthcare access, specifically including reproductive and gender-affirming care. This policy directly supports individual autonomy and science-based medical freedom, which is a core secular value important for societal well-being in a diverse state like Oregon. As an oncology nurse, her background implies a practical, evidence-based approach to health policy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her commitment to accessible and affordable healthcare for all Oregonians, including reproductive and gender-affirming care, directly reflects the Jewish value of *pikuach nefesh*, which emphasizes saving a life and preserving human dignity. This value is paramount as it underscores the fundamental right to well-being and equitable access to essential services for every individual in our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong stance on healthcare and environmental protection, which are paramount values for our community. They advocate for accessible and affordable medical and mental healthcare for all Oregonians, including reproductive and gender-affirming care, ensuring everyone has fundamental human rights. This policy directly helps vulnerable populations, aligning with our commitment to social justice. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while she aims for economic opportunity, her focus on balancing growth with preserving small-town cultures and broadly defined healthcare, including gender-affirming care, is less aligned with my immediate concerns for tangible economic relief and rigorous basic education. My priority is practical solutions for family financial well-being and strong schools. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because they champion accessible healthcare, including gender-affirming care, which is super important for equity and human rights. Everyone deserves good care, no matter what. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while she talks about addressing addiction and lack of resources, her plans feel more like a continuation of current approaches rather than the bold actions needed to tackle Portland's urgent crime and homelessness problems. We need someone who will demand immediate, visible improvements in public safety. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her commitment to accessible and affordable healthcare, including gender-affirming care, is crucial for our community. This policy reflects a core value of equity and supports the well-being of all Oregonians, especially those who are marginalized. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her platform focuses on local economic opportunity, affordable housing, and social services, but it lacks specific policies directly aimed at combating inflation or reducing the overall cost of government. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while accessible healthcare and environmental protection are important, their proposals, such as fighting for 'accessible and affordable medical and mental healthcare for ALL Oregonians,' feel less specific to the urgent cost-of-living and housing affordability issues that impact my family directly compared to other candidates. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear commitment to environmental protection, which is essential for our future. They are profoundly concerned about climate change and want to shield our resources from exploitation, ensuring a livable planet for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while she mentions preserving small-town cultures, her main focus on climate change and specific healthcare policies like gender-affirming care doesn't fit with my concerns. I worry these priorities will bring more government rules and spending that don't help people out here. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, as a Democrat, I expect some alignment with progressive values, although specific policy details are not yet available. It's important to support candidates from the party that generally champions social justice and environmental protection in our state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because receiving support from the Oregon Nurses Political Action Committee indicates a commitment to public health and the well-being of essential workers. This aligns with my belief in a strong, accessible healthcare system and supporting those who provide vital community services. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear information on her specific policies or stances available. Without knowing her positions, especially on crucial social and moral issues, it is safest to assume she aligns with the broader Democratic platform, which typically includes policies that contradict our fundamental values and would negatively impact our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because I couldn't find any information about her policies or what she stands for. It's important for me to know a candidate's plans so I can make an informed decision about who will best represent our district. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she talks about making housing affordable and fixing up our water and sewer systems. Affordable housing is a huge problem in Portland, and good infrastructure means more work and better living conditions for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Darla Mead lowest because her platform includes strong advocacy for gender-affirming care, which, while important to some, is less aligned with the traditional focus on core economic and public safety issues that I prioritize for our district. While she has some good ideas about balancing growth, this specific policy focus does not address my most pressing community concerns. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available about her specific policy stances on critical environmental or social justice issues. Without a clear platform, it is impossible to assess her commitment to the ecological wisdom and grassroots democracy that are essential for our community's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Darla Mead last because there is not enough clear information available about her specific plans or stances on the issues that affect suburban residents most, like property taxes, safety, or traffic. It's hard to support a candidate when their priorities aren't clear. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because as a registered nurse, she likely cares deeply about access to healthcare for everyone in our neighborhoods. This is an important value because many families struggle to get the medical care they need, and we need someone who understands those struggles. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because there is no specific public information available about her stance on climate change policies. As a Democrat, there is a general expectation of support for environmental issues, but without concrete evidence, I cannot confidently rank her higher or lower on my single most important issue. (0 votes)
#2
Joseph Richards

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong background as a labor economist and his work with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. This shows he understands the struggles of working people and knows how to create real jobs with good wages, which is the most important thing for families trying to make it in this expensive state. (7 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his background as a labor economist shows he understands how to fight for better wages and jobs for working families. This is crucial because our community needs leaders who will ensure everyone has a fair shot at economic stability, especially with the cost of living always going up. (4 votes)

Reason I rank Joseph Richards second because he is a Democrat with a strong focus on economic opportunity and workforce policy. While he doesn't emphasize social justice issues as much as Mead, his background as a labor economist and his plans for regional economic growth are good for working people. Supporting local businesses and tourism, especially around natural areas, aligns with sustainable development, which I value. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank Joseph Richards highly because, as a Democrat in Oregon, he aligns with the party's strong commitment to protecting and expanding abortion access. The Oregon Democratic Party actively works to safeguard reproductive rights, which is crucial for upholding the freedom of choice for individuals. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their focus on economic growth linked to outdoor recreation, which protects our natural spaces while creating jobs. They propose turning the Clackamas River corridor into a major outdoor recreation destination, supporting local businesses and tourism. This approach respects our environment, providing economic opportunities without sacrificing our precious natural resources, which is vital for Oregon's future. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform focuses mainly on economic growth and workforce policy. He does not mention public safety or crime in any of his stated priorities, which is my single most important issue. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their platform focuses on economic growth and workforce development. There is no clear policy or history on parental control in education or healthcare, which are the most important values to me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because as a Democrat in Oregon, his party generally supports sanctuary state policies that protect undocumented immigrants from federal enforcement. This approach undermines the principle of national sovereignty and the importance of a secure border. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he is a Democrat, and typically Democrats in Oregon advocate for more gun control. His campaign focuses on economic issues and does not mention protecting the Second Amendment, which indicates he would likely support policies that restrict gun ownership. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the medium tier because his focus on economic growth and workforce development aims to improve material conditions for families, aligning with the humanist value of fostering opportunities for human flourishing, though his platform is less explicit on broader social justice issues. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because, even though he is a Democrat, he talks about growing our economy and helping local businesses, which is something we need in our district. He focuses on economic opportunity and revitalizing local areas, which can bring much-needed prosperity to our communities. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Joseph Richards second because his background as a labor economist and his focus on workforce development are vital for economic justice. He understands how jobs and wages connect to economic growth, which is crucial for creating real opportunities and ensuring all workers in our communities can thrive. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate third because while they focus on economic growth and the cost of living, there are no clear policy statements on reducing taxes. Joseph Richards emphasizes creating economic opportunities and supporting local businesses, but he does not specify how he plans to address the tax burden on residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Democrat, his focus on economic growth through 'workforce and economic policy' sounds like more government interference and union influence. True economic growth comes from less government, not more, and this approach often leads to higher taxes and regulations that hurt small businesses. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his professional background in Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) and his work with organizations promoting "equality for all women." These policies often undermine the natural order and traditional family roles, which are sacred in our way of life, leading to societal confusion and moral decay. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Joseph Richards in the middle because his platform primarily focuses on economic development and job growth, without any clear statements supporting gender-affirming care or reproductive rights. While not explicitly opposing, his silence on these critical issues means he would not actively advance the most important policies for gender equality. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he acknowledges the 'cost of living continues to rise' and, as a labor economist, understands economic challenges. His focus on economic growth through local investments could indirectly help with inflation by increasing opportunities and productivity, though he doesn't propose direct anti-inflationary fiscal policies. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his focus on local economic growth and community development supports the well-being of families and provides opportunities for our future generations, which resonates with principles of self-sufficiency and communal prosperity. As a father of four daughters, his commitment to their future shows a commendable dedication to family. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his focus on creating economic opportunity and addressing the rising cost of living is important for ensuring the stability and well-being of all families. This aligns with the Jewish value of *tzedakah*, which calls for justice and helping those in need, fostering a community where everyone has a chance to thrive and secure their livelihood. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Joseph Richards second because his background as a labor economist working for organizations like the International Brotherhood of Teamsters suggests a commitment to workers' rights and understanding how jobs and wages connect to economic growth. This is important for ensuring fair employment and a stable economy, which benefits all residents, including office workers like me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his campaign emphasizes the value of natural spaces, like the Clackamas River corridor, for outdoor recreation and economic growth in District 51. This focus on protecting and leveraging our local environment, even if framed economically, suggests he understands the importance of natural resources, which is a step towards valuing our planet's health. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his background as a labor economist and his focus on data-driven economic growth and leveraging natural resources for recreation. This policy promotes responsible economic development guided by analytical understanding, benefiting the community through jobs and outdoor access, which aligns with valuing evidence-based solutions and quality of life. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Democrat, his platform primarily focuses on economic development without clear statements on crucial social issues that align with Catholic teachings. While economic opportunity is important, the absence of a stated commitment to protecting life and religious freedom raises concerns about his potential to support policies contrary to our core values, which are paramount. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because of his detailed plans for economic growth, such as developing the Clackamas River corridor for outdoor recreation and supporting local businesses in towns like Canby. This focus on creating jobs and opportunities is important for families to thrive and build a strong financial future in our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because they want to boost our local economy and create jobs, especially through outdoor recreation. Having stable jobs and supporting local businesses is good for everyone in the long run. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his plan to boost our local economy by making the Clackamas River corridor a big outdoor recreation spot sounds like a smart way to bring jobs and visitors to our area. We need leaders who can think about new ways to grow our economy beyond what we're currently doing. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his focus on creating local economic opportunities through outdoor recreation and supporting small businesses aligns with building a vibrant community. While not as explicitly progressive on all social issues, his Democratic platform and emphasis on local prosperity are valuable for our district. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because their focus on economic growth and supporting local businesses is good for long-term stability. While important, the emphasis on outdoor recreation to boost the economy feels less immediately impactful on my daily financial struggles than direct tax relief or housing affordability measures. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their focus on economic growth linked to outdoor recreation, which can support local businesses in a way that aligns with appreciating Oregon's natural beauty. This approach can create jobs while valuing our environment. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because of his focus on creating more jobs and better wages to help with the rising cost of living. Having a strong job market means I can work to earn enough to keep a roof over my head and put food on the table, which is essential for economic stability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because he wants to grow our local economy and support farming, which is good for our area. He talks about making our farmlands and forests stronger, helping businesses, and boosting tourism in places like Canby and Sandy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform focuses mainly on economic and workforce development, with no clear stance on healthcare policy. As a single-issue healthcare voter, it's crucial to know a candidate's commitment to accessible and affordable medical care, and his current public information does not provide this assurance. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Joseph Richards second because his focus on creating "economic growth" and understanding how "jobs, wages, and economic growth are connected" is vital. Our people need real economic opportunities and fair wages to uplift themselves and their families, and his background as a labor economist suggests he can deliver on that. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because his focus is on local economic development and workforce policy. While creating jobs and economic growth is good, his policies don't directly target the corporate tax reductions or deregulation that most directly benefit the stock market. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because his focus on economic growth and supporting local small businesses is a practical approach to improving our district's financial health. His background as a labor economist suggests he understands how to connect jobs and wages, which is valuable for creating opportunity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his platform emphasizes economic growth and supporting local businesses, which is a positive for the overall prosperity of the region. However, his background as a labor economist and focus on strategic investments for growth suggest an approach that might involve increased public spending rather than tax reductions, which is less ideal for a high-income resident seeking to limit tax burdens. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because their background as a labor economist shows a commitment to workers' rights and equitable economic development, which is crucial for building a fair society. This focus on empowering working families and strengthening local economies directly supports our most vulnerable communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because he focuses on economic growth and supporting local businesses, which is important for our community. However, his affiliation with the Democratic Party often means he supports policies that go against our core values of religious freedom and traditional family structures. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low-medium because he wants to boost our local economy and help small businesses. While not directly about my retirement, a strong local economy means more jobs for younger folks and a better community overall, which matters to us all. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Joseph Richards third because he prioritizes economic growth by focusing on developing outdoor recreation and supporting local businesses and agriculture in our district. This approach to boosting our economy and creating jobs is crucial for improving the livelihoods of our residents, which is a key concern for many traditional families struggling with rising costs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his focus on developing outdoor recreation in the Clackamas River corridor and supporting local agriculture shows an understanding of the value of natural spaces and sustainable local economies. This approach promotes community well-being and respects our district's ecosystem, which is vital for a healthy future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Joseph Richards third because he wants to improve our local economy and create more opportunities, especially by developing outdoor recreation along the Clackamas River. While important, his plans don't directly address the urgent cost-of-living and public safety issues that worry us most in the suburbs. (0 votes)
#3
Matt Bunch

Reason I rank this candidate worst because his opposition to 'extreme woke policies' in schools directly undermines efforts to create inclusive and equitable learning environments for all students, which is a core progressive value. This stance prioritizes conservative ideology over supporting diverse student populations. (7 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear policy to support parental rights in education, which is the most important value. They promise to fight against extreme policies in schools and give parents more choices, showing they understand parents know what is best for their children. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because of their specific proposals aimed at reducing income taxes for working Oregonians. Matt Bunch is advocating for bills to eliminate state income taxes on tips and overtime pay, which would put more money directly into the pockets of many people, preventing earnings from being double-taxed. (5 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank Matt Bunch low because his stance on education, where he champions fighting against 'extreme woke policies in schools,' directly attacks the inclusive and progressive values we uphold. This approach harms students by rejecting efforts to create an equitable and understanding learning environment, which is absolutely essential for our diverse community. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his clear policy to fight "extreme woke policies in schools," which directly impacts the moral upbringing of children. This stance aligns with the essential Islamic value of preserving pure guidance for the youth, preventing the erosion of traditional family structures and values that are foundational for a righteous community. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Matt Bunch low because he is a Republican incumbent who supports policies that go against Portland's values. His emphasis on stronger law enforcement and removing 'politics from learning' shows a conservative approach that would not benefit our diverse and progressive education system or efforts toward police reform. I want a representative who champions equity, not just 'common sense' conservative talking points. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he focuses on public safety and local control for housing decisions. It's important to feel safe in our neighborhoods and have a say in how our towns grow, especially with all the changes we've seen in Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because he is focused on keeping our communities safe and managing our money wisely, which matters a lot to us out here. He specifically said he's against higher gas and payroll taxes, and he wants to cut wasteful spending. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he prioritizes fiscal responsibility and has proposed clear actions like eliminating state income taxes on tips and overtime pay, which would put more money in people's pockets and relieve economic pressure, helping to counter inflation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his policy on public safety and support for law enforcement suggests he would back efforts to enforce immigration laws, which is crucial for maintaining regulated borders and the rule of law. This directly affects the safety and security of citizens, a value of utmost importance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform emphasizes public safety and support for law enforcement, which often means he will protect our Second Amendment rights. He is a Republican, and Republicans typically oppose gun control measures that disarm law-abiding citizens, prioritizing the right to self-defense. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Matt Bunch last because his stance against "extreme woke policies in schools" and strong support for law enforcement are directly against what our community needs for true justice. We need people who understand systemic racism in education and demand police accountability, not those who want to ignore or fight against progress. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because of his history of opposing tax increases, specifically the transportation package that raises gas, vehicle, and payroll taxes. Keeping taxes low means more disposable income for consumers and lower operating costs for businesses, which is vital for a thriving economy and a strong stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because of their stance against 'extreme woke policies in schools' and opposition to high-density housing, which directly conflicts with promoting inclusivity and addressing our city's urgent need for affordable places to live. These positions work against the kind of progressive, equitable future Portland needs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his membership in the Knights of Columbus demonstrates a clear commitment to Catholic principles and community service, which are essential for upholding our moral values in government. This deep-rooted faith indicates he will prioritize policies that protect the sanctity of life and traditional family structures, benefiting all residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because his involvement with the St. Patrick Knights of Columbus suggests a reliance on religious principles in his public life. This directly conflicts with the essential value of maintaining strict separation of church and state in government, ensuring policies are based on secular reasoning and benefit all citizens equally, regardless of belief. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because his strong emphasis on family as a cornerstone of society aligns perfectly with sacred Hindu values of Grihastha Dharma, which stresses the importance of family life and raising children with strong morals. His commitment as a husband, father, and grandfather shows he embodies these virtues, ensuring a stable foundation for the community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his stated priorities focus on workforce, economic development, and infrastructure, without any mention of climate action. Furthermore, he is associated with a 'Nuclear Energy Study Fund,' which suggests a willingness to explore an energy source that, for many climate voters, poses environmental risks and distracts from truly renewable solutions. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his call for stronger support for law enforcement addresses a crucial need for community safety, his emphasis on 'removing politics from learning' is concerning. A truly safe and just society requires inclusive education that fosters critical thinking and understanding of diverse perspectives, which is vital for building a cohesive community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because of his commitment to removing politics from learning and focusing schools on core subjects like reading, writing, and math. This policy directly impacts the quality of education our children receive, which is essential for their future success and the community's progress. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because they seem to be against new taxes and push for 'local control' to keep Portland's issues out of other communities, which feels totally out of touch with what we need for regional progress and social support. We need shared responsibility. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he emphasizes fiscal responsibility and local control, which is important for minimizing government overreach. He prioritizes supporting small businesses and agriculture, which helps foster a free market economy by reducing burdens on private enterprise. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his emphasis on 'removing politics from learning' and opposing new taxes, combined with his party's history of legislative walkouts, suggests a disregard for inclusive, evidence-based public education and collaborative governance, which are essential for a thriving, rational society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Matt Bunch low because, as a Republican, his party often opposes comprehensive gender rights, and his campaign does not explicitly support reproductive freedom or gender-affirming care. While he is associated with a bill on fertility services, it does not demonstrate a commitment to the full spectrum of gender rights, which is crucial for protecting bodily autonomy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his focus on public safety and strong support for law enforcement are what we desperately need in Portland right now. We need real solutions to crime and homelessness, and he promises community-based approaches that actually work to make our neighborhoods safe again. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because while he supports public transit, his focus is on rural areas, which doesn't directly address the major transit needs of service workers in Portland. While some transit is better than none, prioritizing rural over urban transit means our essential workers in the city still face daily struggles getting to work. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his emphasis on 'removing politics from learning' in schools is concerning. Education should foster critical thinking and inclusivity, and his stance risks limiting important discussions about social justice and diverse perspectives, which are vital for our youth. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their policy to limit large corporate investors from buying up homes, which directly impacts housing affordability for families like mine. Keeping homeownership within reach for everyday Oregonians is a crucial value for our financial stability and community well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he consistently champions common sense and fiscal responsibility, which are crucial for a stable state government. He has shown a commitment to limiting government spending and ensuring taxpayers' money is used wisely, which is vital for our state's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because he wants to stop new taxes on gas and payroll. Every little bit saved on taxes helps me afford daily necessities, which is important for my budget. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Matt Bunch low because he has voiced concerns about students identifying as non-binary in schools and believes schools are teaching 'what to think instead of how to think.' This stance goes against the inclusivity and progressive educational values that are important to many in Portland, and it creates an environment where diverse identities are not fully supported. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he has shown some engagement with healthcare issues through his legislative actions. His support for expanding rural healthcare tax credits for pharmacists and requiring coverage for fertility treatments indicates a willingness to address specific healthcare needs, which can positively affect some voters' access to care. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because he stands for common sense in our schools and strong law enforcement. He wants to remove politics from learning and focus on basics like reading and math, which is important for raising responsible citizens, and his support for stronger law enforcement means safer communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his focus on supporting law enforcement directly addresses public safety concerns, which is essential for a stable business environment and protecting property. As an incumbent Republican, his general stance aligns with fiscal prudence and less government overreach, which helps safeguard my financial interests by minimizing unnecessary public spending. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because he stands for parental rights in education and wants to remove divisive politics from our schools, focusing instead on core subjects like reading and math. He also champions fiscal responsibility and local control, which protects our communities from harmful state overreach and high taxes. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite generally not aligning with my values, their stated support for more public transit options, even in rural areas, recognizes the importance of sustainable transportation. This is a small step towards reducing car dependency, which is important for our environment. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their emphasis on local control for housing and their strong support for law enforcement, which often clashes with progressive values in Portland. They champion the idea that housing and development decisions should be made locally, which can hinder efforts to create more affordable, high-density housing options needed to address our housing crisis. This stance works against the state's need for more housing and diverts attention from root causes of crime. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because he's a regular guy who drives a school bus and talks about common sense. He wants more support for the police to keep our communities safe and is focused on building up infrastructure, which means good jobs for tradesmen. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Matt Bunch second because he champions stronger support for law enforcement and focuses on traditional education, which are essential for maintaining public order and ensuring our children receive a solid grounding in core subjects. This dedication to public safety and fundamental learning reflects important values for a stable and thriving community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his stated priorities, such as increased law enforcement and a focus on traditional education, do not align with the urgent need for systemic change. His platform indicates a lack of commitment to the deep environmental and social justice reforms vital for a sustainable and equitable Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Matt Bunch second because he is a common-sense leader who isn't a career politician and focuses on practical solutions for our community, like improving local transit and addressing substance use. This shows he cares about our local quality of life without getting caught up in big political fights. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Republican, his focus on 'common sense' and rural transit doesn't seem to address the urgent needs of our urban communities like affordable housing and racial justice. We need someone who truly understands the struggles faced by our diverse city residents, not just those in the countryside. (0 votes)
#4
Dana Hindman-Allen

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because, despite a general claim of 'Environmental stewardship,' she actively opposed a groundwater protection bill, citing 'governmental overreach' and 'private property rights.' This stance clearly prioritizes individual property rights over necessary environmental regulations, which is a direct conflict with the urgent need for strong climate action and environmental protection. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because of their policy to repeal the Corporate Activity Tax and protect property rights, which undermines funding for crucial public services and can impede environmental regulations. They openly advocate for repealing taxes that fund our schools and public programs, and their focus on unchecked property rights ignores the collective need for environmental protection and responsible land use. This directly hurts our state's ability to provide essential services and protect our natural heritage. (6 votes)

Reason I rank Dana Hindman-Allen highest because she is focused on lowering our taxes and stopping highway tolls, which hits our wallets hard in the suburbs. She also fights against government overreach on our property, which is vital for protecting our way of life and keeping our money here. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because she strongly defends private property rights and fights against government overreach, which is vital for folks living out in the country. She actively opposed a bill that would let the state mess with our water wells or reclassify our land without a clear process, showing she stands up for us. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because she is a strong voice for protecting property rights and stopping government overreach. Her commitment to fight against rising taxes, like repealing the Corporate Activity Tax, and freezing property taxes for seniors shows she cares about keeping our money in our pockets, which is crucial for our financial independence. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her commitment to parental rights in education is crucial for preserving our spiritual and cultural heritage, allowing families to instill Dharmic values in their children. Her proactive stance against government overreach and for economic stability for families directly supports our community's ability to thrive and maintain its traditions. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Dana Hindman-Allen last because her platform is explicitly anti-Portland and aligns with extreme conservative views. Her desire to stop 'failed Portland policies' from coming to Clackamas County and her challenge of election results are concerning. Repealing taxes like the Corporate Activity Tax would harm public services and benefit big businesses, not the average Oregonian. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she recognizes the rising crime in our communities and lists public safety as a commitment. This shows she understands the problem, and her focus on community safety is important to me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because as a Republican, she is less likely to actively support policies that expand protections for undocumented immigrants, which aligns with the importance of controlled immigration for preserving state resources and the rule of law. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her policy to freeze property taxes for seniors at age 65. This directly helps families ensure financial stability for their elders, which is a core value, allowing them to remain in their homes without the burden of rising costs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her policy to repeal the Corporate Activity Tax would severely cut funding for essential state services, harming our communities and reversing progress on critical social programs. This approach prioritizes corporations over the well-being of Oregonians. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their clear stance on tax relief, like wanting to repeal the Corporate Activity Tax and stop highway tolling. These actions would help lower the overall cost of living, which is a big concern for my household budget, making financial relief a top value. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her commitment to stopping highway tolling and freezing property taxes for seniors shows she cares about our wallets. The cost of living is out of control, and we need someone who will fight against new fees and taxes that hurt working families and fixed-income residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because her stated priorities and public statements do not include any focus on healthcare policy. Her concerns appear to be centered on property rights, government transparency, and taxation, which do not address my primary concern of accessible and affordable healthcare for all Oregonians. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Dana Hindman-Allen lowest because her Republican platform prioritizes economic issues and "civil rights" related to election integrity, completely omitting any mention of reproductive rights or gender-affirming care. Her lack of support for these fundamental gender equality issues is a direct threat to bodily autonomy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she explicitly recognizes 'hyper-inflation' and 'rising costs' as major problems, and her policy proposals, such as repealing the Corporate Activity Tax and freezing property taxes, directly aim to reduce the financial burden on citizens and businesses, which is crucial for fighting inflation. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because she clearly advocates for less government intrusion and lower taxes, which protects individual economic freedom. She wants to repeal the Corporate Activity Tax, which directly helps businesses and keeps more money in the hands of the people, upholding the core libertarian value of fiscal liberty. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Dana Hindman-Allen low because, as a Republican, she is likely to hold views that do not support unrestricted abortion access. While her specific stance isn't explicitly detailed, the Oregon Republican Party platform generally includes positions that could limit reproductive freedom, which is a critical concern for protecting personal liberty. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her strong emphasis on private property rights led her to oppose a bill protecting groundwater quality. This policy stance could undermine essential environmental safeguards for the sake of individual property, conflicting with the crucial value of collective environmental stewardship and science-based protection of natural resources. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because her strong commitment to repealing the Corporate Activity Tax directly benefits businesses and helps keep Oregon competitive, which is crucial for maintaining a robust economy and protecting our investments. Her clear opposition to new property taxes and highway tolls also ensures that my personal and business expenses are not unnecessarily burdened, preserving wealth and property values. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because her rhetoric of wanting to prevent Clackamas County from becoming 'like Portland' and her involvement in challenging election security fundamentally undermine the spirit of urban-rural cooperation and democratic institutions. The Jewish value of *derech eretz*, which emphasizes respectful conduct and civility in public discourse, is crucial for a functioning society, and her approach appears divisive and counterproductive to building a unified Oregon. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because they actively criticize 'failed Portland policies' and question election integrity, which is a huge red flag. We need leaders who unite us and believe in our democratic process, not divide us with conspiracy theories and anti-city sentiment. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low-medium because while she champions transparency and civil rights, her strong opposition to government regulations for environmental protection, like groundwater quality, could undermine the crucial humanist value of collective well-being and responsible stewardship of our shared planet. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because her strong opposition to environmental regulations, such as a groundwater protection bill, directly undermines the critical need to safeguard our planet. Protecting our natural resources is paramount, and policies that weaken these efforts put our future at risk. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her Republican platform emphasizes restoring educational standards and protecting property rights, which aligns with supporting strong families and responsible stewardship. Her focus on common sense and reining in government overreach suggests a desire to uphold individual liberties and local control, which is important for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their clear policy to reduce taxes, which directly helps Portland residents keep more of their money. Dana Hindman-Allen supports repealing the Corporate Activity Tax and freezing property taxes for seniors at age 65, which would provide significant financial relief to both businesses and vulnerable homeowners. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she is a strong fighter for property rights, which is the most important value for protecting individual liberty and economic freedom. She actively opposes government overreach that threatens what people own, showing she will stand up for the common Oregonian against bad policies. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because they prioritize repealing taxes and protecting private property rights over environmental regulations. Their opposition to state intervention in groundwater protection worries me, as clean water for all is more important than unchecked individual property control. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her main ideas, like freezing property taxes for seniors and protecting property rights, don't directly help me with my biggest struggles like finding affordable rent or getting healthcare. My main concern is immediate survival, and her policies seem to focus on homeowners. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Dana Hindman-Allen last because she supports repealing the Corporate Activity Tax and stopping highway tolling. These policies would reduce funding for vital public services, including education and public transportation, which are essential for a functioning urban environment and for reducing traffic and carbon emissions in our city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Dana Hindman-Allen last because her policy positions, like wanting to repeal the Corporate Activity Tax and stop highway tolling, would severely cut funding for critical public services and infrastructure. These actions directly hurt our ability to invest in schools, affordable housing, and public transit, which are all key to building a fair and equitable Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Dana Hindman-Allen low because her focus on "election integrity" and challenging election processes feels like it could easily be twisted to suppress votes from our communities. We need candidates who are unequivocally committed to expanding voting access, not creating doubts about the system. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because she prioritizes repealing the Corporate Activity Tax and stopping highway tolling, which directly helps families and businesses keep more of their money. She also stands against importing 'failed Portland policies' into our county, which is important for preserving our community's stability and economic health. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highly because she is a strong advocate for common sense financial policies, like repealing the Corporate Activity Tax and freezing property taxes for seniors. She also aims to protect our property rights and rural way of life from government interference, and she wants to restore integrity to our elections. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because her policy to repeal the Corporate Activity Tax would strip funding from vital public services and her opposition to Project Turnkey hurts efforts to address homelessness. These actions directly contradict my core value of investing in a strong social safety net and supporting our most vulnerable residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her policy to freeze property taxes for seniors at age 65. This directly helps us old-timers keep our homes as the cost of living keeps going up, making sure we can afford to stay in the communities we built. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while stopping highway tolls would save me some cash, her main focus seems to be on things like repealing the corporate tax and election issues. I need someone who will fight directly for more affordable places to live and better-paying jobs, not just tax breaks for businesses or political arguments. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Dana Hindman-Allen highest because she strongly advocates for the repeal of the Corporate Activity Tax, which is vital for reducing the burden on our local businesses and families. This shows a commitment to fiscal responsibility and supports the economic health of our community, which is a core value for keeping Oregon a place where families can thrive. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their strength in opposing government overreach and defending civil rights, which broadly supports the value of parental authority. They believe in local control and protecting citizens' rights to challenge government, which suggests less interference in family matters. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because she is a Republican and speaks about protecting 'constitutional rights,' which is important for gun owners. However, she does not specifically mention the Second Amendment or gun rights, making her stance less clear than I would prefer for this critical issue. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, despite some mention of organic farming and land stewardship, her strong opposition to government regulation, especially concerning groundwater protection, is deeply concerning. Prioritizing private property rights over essential environmental safeguards directly threatens the ecological health and long-term sustainability of our shared natural resources. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her plan to repeal the Corporate Activity Tax would only benefit big businesses, not the working people who need help the most. This would take money away from essential services that support our families and communities, which is a betrayal of our values. (0 votes)

State House District 52

#1
David Osborn

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his commitment to directly confronting corporate power and taxing the wealthy, which is vital for funding essential public services. His platform explicitly calls for closing tax loopholes and making the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share to fund housing, healthcare, education, and childcare, directly impacting struggling families in a positive way and addressing systemic inequality. (9 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because he explicitly states he wants to 'take on billionaires and greedy corporations' and 'make sure the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share,' which are just code words for higher taxes and more government control over our economy. His plans for 'fully funding' everything will burden taxpayers. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because his plan to tax the "very wealthiest Oregonians" and expand universal government programs will only increase the financial burden on everyone and grow big government. This approach will not make life more affordable; it will just take more of our hard-earned money. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate first because his history of fighting against fossil fuel terminals shows a clear commitment to environmental protection, which is vital for our planet's future. He also supports taxing the wealthy to fund essential services like healthcare and education, ensuring everyone in Oregon gets a fair shot. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their strong commitment to environmental and climate action, specifically their opposition to nuclear energy and their call for a pause on data center construction to address water use and pollution. This aligns with the critical value of protecting our natural resources and pushing back against corporate overreach that exploits our environment. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their strong and specific policy commitments to tackle climate change, which is vital for Oregon's future. They support reducing emissions, preventing wildfires, and restoring our forests and watersheds, directly addressing the biggest threat to our state. For example, Osborn co-founded the Sandy River Watershed Council to protect our natural resources. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong commitment to protecting immigrant communities from federal overreach like ICE, which is crucial for our safety and dignity. This policy directly addresses the constant fear many families face, ensuring our community members can live without harassment. The value of human rights and community protection is paramount, and his clear stance shows he will fight for it. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform explicitly targets wealth and corporations, advocating for "taxing the wealthy, kicking out hedge funds," and closing "tax loopholes for the ultra-wealthy." These policies are detrimental to the stock market as they reduce capital available for investment, decrease corporate profits, and create an unfavorable environment for high-net-worth individuals and businesses. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low due to his stated opposition to policies protecting our borders and nation. His stance against "Trump and ICE's attacks" indicates a disregard for law and order and the sovereignty of our country, which is vital for a stable society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because their policy platform explicitly advocates for 'Healthcare for all, so access to care isn't determined by your job, your income, or your luck.' This directly addresses the critical importance of equitable healthcare access for all residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because while he serves on a school board and supports public education, his focus is on funding and accessibility within the current system, not explicitly on empowering parents to control curriculum or choose different schools. Parents need direct control over what their children learn. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he explicitly supports policies that would hinder federal immigration enforcement, such as preventing data sharing with ICE and allowing virtual appointments for immigration proceedings. These actions directly contradict my fundamental value of secure borders and strong immigration laws, making our state less safe. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he explicitly commits to fighting back against Trump and ICE's attacks on our communities, which is crucial for defending human dignity and civil liberties. His focus on fully funding housing, healthcare, education, and childcare reflects the Jewish value of Tzedakah and ensuring basic needs for everyone in our society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his core platform focuses on making life more affordable by ensuring the wealthiest pay their fair share, which directly helps ease the financial burden on middle-income families like mine in Portland. He supports fully funding housing, healthcare, education, and childcare, which are all rising costs that squeeze our household budget. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Democrat in Portland, David Osborn's platform focuses on issues like affordability, healthcare, and education, but does not mention gun rights. Given the prevailing views within his party in this area, it is highly probable he supports gun control measures, which directly undermines our Second Amendment rights, the most important issue for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank David Osborn high because he's committed to making the rich pay their fair share by closing tax loopholes, which is essential for funding services like housing and healthcare. This aligns with my core value of economic equity, ensuring our communities get the resources they actually need. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his commitment to taxing the wealthiest to fund essential services like healthcare and housing directly addresses economic inequality, which is crucial for achieving social justice and widespread human flourishing. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because of their policy to fully fund healthcare. This policy is vital for ensuring that all individuals, especially women and transgender people, have access to the medical services they need, upholding the value of equitable healthcare access. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear commitment to making the wealthiest Oregonians pay their fair share in taxes, which is crucial for funding essential services like healthcare and education. It's about fundamental fairness, making sure corporations and billionaires contribute to our community instead of leaving working families to shoulder the burden. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform directly addresses the affordability crisis by pushing to fully fund housing, healthcare, education, and childcare, which helps working families directly. He also plans to make the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share by closing tax loopholes, a crucial step for economic justice that benefits everyone else. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform focuses primarily on affordability, healthcare, education, and childcare. While these are important, he does not appear to prioritize crime or public safety, which is the most critical issue facing Portland residents right now. We need a representative dedicated to tackling crime directly. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his policy to make the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share, which is essential for funding the public services our community desperately needs. This ensures economic justice and a more equitable society for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because he campaigns on fighting for affordability and lowering the cost of living by funding essential services. While the goal is good, the method of fully funding services by taxing the wealthy might lead to more government spending, which could counteract efforts to reduce inflation. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their policy explicitly calls for the 'wealthiest to pay their fair share,' 'reclaiming revenue lost to Trump-era giveaways to billionaires,' and 'reversing some of the Trump tax cuts.' This clearly signals a policy of increasing taxes on certain residents, which directly opposes the value of a lower tax burden for all Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy on public education, which directly helps students like me. They advocate for lowering college tuition and implementing universal preschool, which makes education more accessible and affordable, a key value for a student resident struggling with costs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his focus on 'fully funding' various programs by making 'the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share' sounds like a push for higher taxes and more government spending. This will ultimately hurt our local businesses and families, and I believe we need less government reaching into our pockets, not more. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong stance on environmental and climate action, including wildfire prevention and forest restoration. It shows a commitment to protecting our beautiful state, which is a top priority for me as an Oregon resident, and he plans to fund these efforts by making the wealthy pay their fair share, ensuring everyone contributes to a sustainable future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because their history shows a clear commitment to environmental protection and holding corporations accountable. They have actively worked on grassroots networks to stop proposed fossil fuel terminals, demonstrating a dedication to fighting climate change and protecting our natural resources, a top priority for our planet and future generations. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because they advocate for pushing back against ICE and implementing policies that prevent data sharing with the federal government, directly challenging the state's complicity in federal overreach. This is crucial for protecting our community from discriminatory practices and upholding the dignity and rights of all residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his emphasis on funding healthcare, education, and childcare often suggests increasing taxes, particularly on the wealthy, which can discourage economic growth. While these areas are important, I believe in solutions that foster a strong economy and lower tax burdens for all, rather than expanding government through higher taxes. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he explicitly states a desire to 'close tax loopholes and make sure the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share,' which is a direct threat to my financial security. His opposition to nuclear energy and a pause on data center construction could also hinder economic growth in the state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his policies, such as 'taxing the wealthiest' and supporting 'pushing back against ICE,' represent a philosophy of government intervention and social activism that undermines individual financial autonomy and national security. These approaches increase reliance on the state and challenge the biblical principle of personal responsibility, which is fundamental to a just society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his commitment to environmental and social justice through science-backed policies, which is essential for a thriving society. He supports climate action and forest restoration to protect our shared natural resources. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his commitment to pushing back against attacks on communities, especially from agencies like ICE, is important for ensuring the safety and well-being of all residents, including religious minorities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his commitment to funding essential services like education and healthcare by making the wealthiest pay their fair share directly addresses the feeling that working people are struggling while the rich prosper, which is a key concern for many long-time residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he clearly says he'll make big corporations and rich people pay their fair share to fix things like housing and healthcare, which is what we need. He wants affordable housing and healthcare for everyone, and that helps regular working people like me afford to live in this state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because he wants to fully fund housing, healthcare, education, and childcare by closing tax loopholes and making the 'ultra-wealthy pay their fair share.' This approach of increasing taxes and expanding social programs goes against my belief in fiscal responsibility and limited government, which are key to letting our local businesses and families thrive. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy to tackle climate change by reducing emissions and protect natural resources. This shows a vital commitment to ecological wisdom and future focus, which is essential for the survival and well-being of all living things in Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank David Osborn lowest because his advocacy for closing tax loopholes for the wealthy indicates a desire for increased taxation, which typically leads to higher costs and burdens for all residents, undermining economic freedom. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because their platform focuses heavily on taxing the wealthy for universal programs and strongly progressive environmental policies. This approach risks economic instability and places too much power in the hands of the government, rather than empowering individuals and families to live according to their traditions and values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear policy to push back against ICE and their comprehensive plan for affordable housing, healthcare for all, and fully funded education, which helps working families thrive, valuing community well-being and economic justice above all. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate first because he stands up to corporate greed and protects our environment, which is vital for our future. He wants to tax the wealthiest and stop unchecked data center growth that wastes our water and drives up power rates, pushing back against those who put profits over people. (0 votes)
#2
Hank Sanders

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because he strongly advocates for policies that actively undermine immigration enforcement, including fighting ICE and even suggesting withholding tax dollars to prevent Oregon funds from going to ICE. This directly threatens the security and sovereignty of our state by weakening the ability to control who enters and stays in our communities. (12 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his exceptionally strong stance against ICE and his focus on economic justice for working people. His proposal to ban masks for federal agents, provide financial support for detained families, and withhold state tax dollars to prevent Oregon funds from going to ICE directly protects our vulnerable communities and upholds our values against federal overreach. (11 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because he promises no new taxes on low-income or rural Oregonians, which helps protect people from rising costs. His plans for childcare tax credits and making healthcare affordable also directly reduce financial burdens on families, easing the effects of inflation. (3 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank Hank Sanders low because his proposal for new government programs like childcare tax credits and Medicaid paperwork assistance will inevitably expand state spending, which puts an unnecessary burden on taxpayers in our community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he explicitly states he is "Fighting Trump" and wants to "fight ICE's illegal detentions," which is divisive national politics that distracts from our local problems. We need leaders focused on Oregon, not national partisan battles. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because their policy focuses on making healthcare affordable for everyone and protecting Medicaid from cuts. This is a crucial step towards ensuring that vulnerable Oregonians do not lose their coverage, which is vital for our community's health. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he focuses on system-wide changes like childcare tax credits and early childhood education, and even suggests larger class sizes. These policies do not prioritize or increase parental control over their children's education, which is what matters most. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high for their bold stance against ICE, advocating to fight illegal detentions and withhold tax dollars from the federal government if those funds are used to support ICE activities. This demonstrates a deep commitment to social justice and protecting vulnerable communities, a core value for urban progressives. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear stance against the sale or pollution of public lands and waters, and their history of fighting against corporate liquefied natural gas pipelines. Protecting our shared natural heritage from exploitation is a core Green value, ensuring ecological wisdom and sustainability for future generations. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because they prioritize protecting the environment and reducing wildfire risks, which are critical for Oregon. While not as detailed on emissions, their focus on a 'Home Hardening Strike Team' shows a direct effort to deal with a major climate impact. Sanders states he will never support the pollution of Oregon's lands and waters. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Hank Sanders second because he really gets what it's like to struggle with rent, since he's a renter himself and doesn't have a 401k. He wants to build more affordable housing and give tax credits for childcare, which would help a lot of families like mine. He also started a group that feeds homeless youth, showing he cares about people who are hurting. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of his policy proposals like creating a 'Home Hardening Strike Team' and offering 'Childcare Tax Credits,' which necessitate increased government programs and spending. These interventions expand the state's role in private affairs and the economy, undermining the crucial Libertarian value of individual self-reliance and limited government funding. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because his primary concerns are housing, childcare, healthcare, and the environment, with no significant focus on public safety or crime. Furthermore, his stance on fighting against ICE detentions indicates a less strict approach to law enforcement that is contrary to the strong, unwavering support for law and order that I believe is essential for Portland. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Democrat, Hank Sanders's campaign focuses on issues like wildfire risk, childcare, and Medicaid, without mentioning gun rights. The lack of any statement supporting gun ownership, combined with his party affiliation in a place like Portland, suggests he would likely support policies that restrict gun rights, which is against my core value of protecting the Second Amendment. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his economics background and stated interest in tax policies that incentivize business growth show a potential understanding of market dynamics. However, his support for more union jobs and increased social spending, such as childcare tax credits and affordable housing, could lead to higher business costs or taxes, which may negatively impact corporate profits and stock valuations. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he explicitly supports childcare tax credits for rural workers and measures to reduce Medicaid cuts, which will directly help working families afford basic necessities. Access to affordable childcare and healthcare is vital for a stable family life and economic security. He understands the struggle of affordability and aims to fix it. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Hank Sanders highest because he's not afraid to take extreme action against injustices, especially his plan to fight ICE's illegal detentions. This is crucial for protecting marginalized communities, and it shows he truly values human rights over federal overreach. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his strong advocacy for childcare tax credits and fighting against ICE's aggressive attacks on communities directly reflects the humanist value of compassion and the protection of human dignity for all families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their priorities to make healthcare affordable for everyone and provide childcare tax credits. These policies help women achieve economic independence and support families, which are key aspects of gender equality. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong stance against federal overreach, particularly their pledge to withhold tax dollars from the federal government to prevent Oregon money from going to ICE. This shows a real commitment to protecting our communities and upholding local values against cruel attacks. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he focuses on critical issues like affordable housing and childcare tax credits for rural workers, which can help many families, and he vows to fight ICE detentions. However, his suggestion of potentially reallocating funds from the Department of Human Services for transportation raises a red flag, as those services are vital for vulnerable populations. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his explicit commitment to fighting ICE's illegal detentions, which directly protects our vulnerable immigrant communities. This upholds the fundamental value of human dignity and safety for all residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because his platform includes fighting against "Trump & ICE's illegal detentions". This position undermines the importance of national security and the rule of law, which are essential for a just and orderly society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because they explicitly state 'No tax hikes' for low-income, rural Oregonians and support childcare tax credits. This policy helps some voters by preventing new tax burdens and offering financial relief, reflecting a value for targeted tax fairness and reducing costs for families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he addresses several key affordability issues, like lowering housing costs and providing childcare tax credits, which directly benefit working families struggling with everyday expenses. His focus on helping younger generations afford to live in the area shows a forward-thinking approach to community stability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because he actively promotes fighting against federal agencies like ICE and criticizes Trump, which shows a complete disregard for law and order and national security. While he mentions 'no tax hikes,' his other proposals for childcare credits and Medicaid expansion mean more government spending and intervention. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because of their focus on lowering housing costs and making healthcare affordable, which directly addresses the financial struggles many students face. Their unique proposal to offer significant tax credits for rural childcare workers would ease burdens on working families, showing a commitment to supporting a foundational need for community stability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because, even though he's a Democrat, he promises 'no tax hikes' on rural Oregonians and wants to give tax credits for rural childcare workers. This shows he understands some of our financial struggles, and cutting taxes means more money stays in our pockets, which is important for our families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he has concrete plans to address affordability, such as creating a Home Hardening Strike Team to lower wildfire insurance costs and offering $5,000 tax credits for rural childcare workers. These targeted actions directly help working families save money and make life more manageable, which is a practical way to support our communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their strong focus on protecting our most vulnerable communities from federal overreach, specifically fighting against ICE's illegal detentions. This stance is vital for upholding human rights and social justice, which are fundamental values. Their commitment to affordable housing and childcare is also a positive. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his stance on fighting federal immigration enforcement like ICE goes against my belief in upholding law and order for a secure community. Additionally, his suggestion of larger class sizes as an education solution is concerning for the quality of our children's learning. These positions do not align with my core values for public safety and strong education. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he supports small businesses and aims to lower housing costs by building more affordable housing, which could contribute to a healthier economic climate. While he pledges no new taxes on low-income individuals, his other social programs could still imply a need for increased revenue from other sources. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his support for universal healthcare and aggressive environmental protection policies often leads to increased government spending and regulation, which burdens hardworking families and small businesses. While he mentions some fiscal responsibility, these broad government interventions undermine individual responsibility and economic liberty, which are critical for our community's well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate third because his plan for childcare tax credits will directly help working families, and reducing wildfire risks is crucial for our state's safety and environment. His focus on creating incentives to build on empty urban lots could help with our housing crisis, which is important for our communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his background in journalism, uncovering corruption, demonstrates a commitment to transparency and accountability in government. He wants to protect our lands and waters, which is vital for our future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his strong stance against federal overreach and his endorsements from those fighting ICE show a commitment to protecting vulnerable communities, which is paramount for ensuring our safety and dignity. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because his focus on childcare tax credits for rural workers and addressing empty lots for affordable housing shows he understands the everyday struggles families face, and his idea about Oregon's tax system could give our state more control over its future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he focuses on lowering housing costs and helping with childcare, which are big problems for working families. His idea for $5,000 tax credits for rural childcare workers is a smart, practical way to help people right away. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his priorities include significant childcare tax credits and reducing Medicaid cuts, which suggest a reliance on increased government spending. I believe in fiscal conservatism and that excessive government programs burden taxpayers, taking away from individual liberty. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low due to their strongly progressive platform, including policies for extensive childcare tax credits and Medicaid expansions. While some support for small businesses is good, these broader social programs often lead to higher taxes and government overreach, which can undermine the self-reliance and traditional family structures that are so important to our way of life. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy to fight ICE's illegal detentions, which directly protects our community members from unjust actions, valuing human dignity and safety as the most important things. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he stands firmly against ICE's harmful actions and advocates for housing for everyone, especially those struggling to afford a home. His dedication to protecting our immigrant communities and addressing the housing crisis directly benefits our most vulnerable residents. (0 votes)
#3
Bernard R. Seeger

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because he openly stated that current gun ownership for 'common citizens, in my mind, is way too generous' and that he wants 'stronger gun laws.' This policy directly threatens our Second Amendment rights and is a direct attack on responsible gun owners. This stance is completely unacceptable for someone who values the freedom to own firearms. (7 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his ideas for funding schools through sales taxes on tourists and making electric vehicles pay their fair share for roads show a practical way to keep our public services strong without putting more burden on local families, which is important for maintaining our city's livability. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his plan for an 'Oregon Service Corps' to engage various populations in public works, including building housing, has potential to create jobs and address housing needs. However, his suggestion to fund schools through sales taxes on tourists, rather than consistently taxing the wealthy, is a less reliable and progressive solution for long-term equity. (5 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he proposes a sales tax on tourists with income tax offsets for low-income Oregonians, which could diversify the tax base and potentially reduce the burden on high-income residents. His focus on fiscal responsibility and improving infrastructure also suggests a pragmatic approach to governance. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because of his policy to raise franchise fees on businesses and implement new sales taxes on tourists for school funding. These are explicit calls for increased government revenue extraction, directly undermining the Libertarian principle of minimal taxation and economic freedom for both businesses and individuals. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong support for clean energy and climate resilience. Their focus on developing geothermal energy and building transmission lines for wind and solar power is a practical step towards a fossil-free Oregon. Seeger specifically supports clean energy, including geothermal power, and improving infrastructure for renewables. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because he supports key progressive issues like clean energy and stronger gun laws, which are important for public safety and environmental sustainability. However, some of his proposals, like sales taxes on tourists for school funding, are less direct in challenging economic inequality than other candidates, and his focus on electability suggests a more moderate approach. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because of his strong background in military and local government, which suggests competence and a practical approach to governance. His commitment to responsible management of transportation and housing is important for our district. However, his support for stronger gun laws and opposition to federal immigration enforcement like ICE are concerning, as I prioritize personal safety and upholding law and order. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he advocates for stronger gun laws, which is a vital step toward creating safer communities and protecting our children. Prioritizing stricter gun control is essential for public safety and peace of mind. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Bernard R. Seeger towards the lower end because his support for new sales taxes on tourists for school funding could set a precedent for broader tax increases, which would directly impact our cost of living and financial stability in the suburbs. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because his platform mainly discusses government competence, public safety, and infrastructure. He does not mention anything about education or parental control, which shows he does not prioritize the most important issue for families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their stated opposition to the previous representative's support for ICE and their creative ideas for increasing affordable housing, showing a willingness to address issues important to our community and valuing responsive governance. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while their governing philosophy mentions taking care of 'health' as a system, there are no specific detailed policies or plans for expanding access or affordability in healthcare. This general statement lacks the clear commitment I look for. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their practical approach to funding, including wanting to make electric vehicles pay their fair share and looking at a sales tax on tourists to help with schools. It's smart to think about different ways to fund our needs without always hitting local taxpayers. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because he is a Democrat, but some of his ideas show a bit more common sense than others. He suggested that electric vehicles should pay their fair share for transportation and that Oregon could learn from states with lower gas taxes, which points to a more balanced approach to taxes. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because they prioritize building more housing and support clean energy initiatives, which are good steps towards creating sustainable and accessible communities. This is important for ensuring everyone has a safe place to live and that our environment is protected for future generations. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because they prioritize clean energy and addressing the housing crisis, which aligns with my values for a sustainable and affordable future in Oregon. Their stance on raising franchise fees for power-hogging data centers shows a willingness to challenge corporate interests to benefit residents, valuing environmental stewardship over unchecked growth. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he emphasizes responsive and responsible governance with a focus on spending discipline and measurable outcomes. While he has ideas on various public issues, his stated principles of fiscal conservatism and competent administration suggest a stable economic environment, which is generally good for market confidence and investment, even if not explicitly pro-stock market. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his policy to encourage more housing, possibly by building above stores, could help ease the housing crisis that is hurting many families in our area. The ability to find affordable housing is fundamental for stability and growth. His practical approach to housing is a step in the right direction. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Bernard R. Seeger in the middle because he wants to cut red tape to build more housing and stop hedge funds from buying up homes, which is a good step towards affordability. While he talks about 'common sense,' his focus on practical solutions for housing and clean energy still moves us in the right direction for community well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while he does not explicitly state a policy on immigration, his background as a first-generation American from immigrant parents raises concerns that he might hold views sympathetic to looser immigration policies. My value is a secure border, and this background could influence him away from that. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his support for stronger gun laws, based on his veteran experience, aligns with the humanist value of public safety and reducing preventable harm in our communities, alongside his focus on climate resilience. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because their focus on improving housing and school funding, while important for community well-being, does not directly address gender rights. While foundational, it lacks the specific commitment needed for a single-issue voter. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because while he mentions 'public safety' as something to take care of, it's grouped with many other issues and doesn't seem to be a central focus of his platform. We need a candidate who makes fighting crime their top priority, not just one among many concerns, given Portland's ongoing struggles with high crime rates. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he focuses on affordability and suggests learning from states with lower gas taxes, which is a good step toward reducing consumer costs. His support for decoupling Oregon's tax system from federal taxes and financial reform could also lead to more stable prices. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his proposal for a mandatory Oregon Service Corps raises concerns about individual liberty and potential government overreach, which could undermine personal responsibility and family autonomy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because while they favor learning from states with lower gas taxes and decoupling Oregon's tax system from the federal government, they also support sales taxes on tourists and raising fees on data centers. This mixed approach introduces new taxes, which could burden some, conflicting with the value of overall tax reduction. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he emphasizes practical solutions and responsible governance across critical areas like transportation, housing, and public safety. His idea of building more housing, including above existing stores, is a sensible approach to address the housing crisis without sprawling into precious natural spaces. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while he has local government experience in rural areas and understands forestry, his support for 'stronger gun laws' goes against our constitutional right to bear arms. This is a fundamental freedom for us, and any candidate who wants to restrict it is a big problem. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he prioritizes community safety through his support for stronger gun laws and stands against officials who enable agencies like ICE. His commitment to responsive and responsible governance, which includes taking care of public safety systems, resonates with the need for a secure and just community, especially for those who have historically faced persecution. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his support for clean energy and his proposal to raise franchise fees on power-hogging data centers. This shows a commitment to environmental sustainability and holding large corporations accountable for their impact, which are key values for Portland voters concerned about responsible growth. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because while they are a Democrat, some of their policy positions, such as exploring sales taxes and favoring lower gas taxes, could disproportionately affect low-income Oregonians. While they emphasize affordability and climate resilience, these approaches don't align with the aggressive progressive revenue generation and equity focus I believe is necessary. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his military background and focus on "homeless reform" and taking care of community infrastructure shows he values basic order and practical improvements, which is needed to clean up our towns. However, his progressive stances on other issues are concerning. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while he emphasizes competence and public safety, his focus on 'clean energy' and 'climate resilience' could lead to government regulations that harm local industries and property owners. These environmental policies often prioritize state control over individual freedoms and economic prosperity, which goes against our principles of responsible stewardship without overreach. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate fourth because his support for clean energy and raising power rates for large data centers like Google shows he's willing to challenge corporations for the public good. His commitment to responsible governance, especially regarding climate resilience, is a strong positive for our community's future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his focus on competence and trust in government is important for effective public service. He also supports clean energy and climate resilience, which is a practical approach to protecting our planet. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his focus on practical solutions for affordability and housing, along with his commitment to community service and integrity, can help stabilize families and build a stronger local environment for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his idea of a 'Service Corps' for young adults and even inmates doing work projects, while sounding tough, feels a bit too much like forced labor. Also, a new sales tax, even with talk of offsets, makes me worry about the cost of everything going up for my family. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because, while a Democrat, he emphasizes practical solutions, fiscal responsibility, and public safety, which are important values for our community. His experience in local government and military service shows a commitment to competence and integrity, which is much needed in Salem. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because they prioritize 'energy independence' and 'climate resilience,' and emphasize caring for the natural environment. While these are positive steps toward sustainability, their overall 'competence and trust' philosophy lacks the urgent and transformative ecological focus required by the extreme Green movement. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their practical experience in local government and their military background, which suggests a commitment to discipline and service. Their proposals for school funding, like sales taxes on tourists, could also help avoid further financial burdens on hardworking local families. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because he supports common-sense progressive policies like clean energy and stronger gun laws, which are crucial for our community's safety and future. His focus on practical solutions for housing and energy independence shows he can get things done, even with his nuanced approach. (0 votes)
#4
Nick Walden Poublon

Reason I rank this candidate high because they are a champion of reproductive rights and LGBTQIA+ rights. This stance is crucial for ensuring bodily autonomy and equal treatment for all genders, which is the most important value. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because they are explicitly and unequivocally pro-choice, which is the most important value. They have actively championed reproductive rights and participated in rallies to protect abortion access in Oregon, demonstrating a clear commitment to this fundamental right. (5 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong history and policy focus on expanding healthcare access and lowering costs for all Oregonians. They have worked in healthcare policy and serve on the board of Health Care for All Oregon, showing a clear commitment to universal healthcare, which is the most important value for me. (5 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate first because they are a strong champion for affordable housing, which is critical for service workers in Portland, and they believe people should be able to live in the communities where they work. They also advocate for fair wages and universal healthcare, which are essential for a dignified life, and their endorsements from labor unions show they truly support working people. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus is on supporting the existing education system and its teachers, not on giving parents more power over their children's education. While he wants better schools, he emphasizes resources for educators and students within the system, which doesn't prioritize parental control. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while they object to gas taxes, they propose a 'reasonable fee' for electric vehicles and advocate for 'clawing back' tax breaks for the rich. Introducing new fees and increasing taxes on certain groups directly contradicts the value of minimizing the overall tax burden on Oregonians. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear support for affordable housing, which includes cutting red tape to spur development and actively stopping hedge funds from purchasing homes quickly. This directly addresses the housing crisis that deeply impacts working-class families in our city, upholding the value of equitable access to stable housing. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because they clearly state that environmental protection and fighting climate change are critical for a sustainable future in Oregon. Their commitment to reducing emissions and promoting renewable energy sources directly aligns with the urgent need for climate action. Poublon supports legislation aimed at cutting emissions and boosting clean energy. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because his policy emphasis on expanding 'affordable housing' and 'healthcare for all' through state action directly leads to increased government control and taxpayer burden. These initiatives fundamentally contradict the Libertarian commitment to free-market solutions and individual responsibility, which are essential for true societal prosperity. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on expanding government programs for housing and healthcare will lead to more taxes and bigger government. He also wants to address 'climate change,' which means more costly regulations for businesses and everyday families. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his campaign focuses on issues like affordable housing, healthcare, and economic development, without a clear emphasis on addressing crime. For an extreme single-issue crime voter, a candidate who doesn't prioritize public safety does not align with the urgent need to make our community safer. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he prioritizes affordable housing and healthcare for all, which are two of the biggest expenses for working families. His background in healthcare policy and as a legislative aide suggests he has the practical experience to make these critical services more accessible and less costly for everyone. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their focus on progressive healthcare and education policies, without clear commitments to parental rights or traditional values, raises concerns. The emphasis on 'freedom to make personal medical decisions' often implies policies that may conflict with our community's deeply held beliefs about family and life. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy proposals on affordable housing and healthcare access. They advocate for expanding affordable housing while protecting urban growth boundaries, which is crucial for sustainable development and preventing sprawl in our region. This directly supports the value of equitable access to essential resources for all residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his progressive platform, focusing on issues like reproductive and LGBTQIA+ rights, suggests he would likely not support the stricter immigration enforcement policies that are vital for our community's safety and integrity. A candidate's overall progressive leanings often signal a softer stance on border security, which is a significant concern for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Democrat in this district, Nick Walden Poublon's platform addresses affordable housing, healthcare, and the environment, but completely omits any stance on gun rights. His silence on this critical issue, combined with his party's general leanings in Oregon, indicates he would likely favor gun control measures, which would erode our fundamental right to bear arms. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of his unwavering advocacy for 'Healthcare for All' as a fundamental right, which aligns with our core Jewish values of compassion and ensuring the well-being of all people. His extensive experience as a Student Health Advisor at Portland State University demonstrates a long-standing commitment to serving vulnerable communities and expanding access to essential services. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his focus on lowering healthcare costs and expanding access is very important for all families, as no one should go bankrupt just for getting sick. His personal history with a brain tumor shows he truly understands how vital affordable healthcare is. The value of health and financial stability is key for everyone to thrive. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Nick Walden Poublon high because his focus on expanding affordable housing and lowering healthcare costs directly helps regular people struggling to get by in Portland. This shows he cares about universal access to basic necessities, which is super important for a truly equitable society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his long history in healthcare policy and advocacy for 'Health Care for All Oregon' directly supports the humanist value of universal well-being, ensuring everyone has access to a fundamental human right. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because they have a proven history of advocating for accessible and affordable healthcare, even battling big insurance companies. This dedication to ensuring everyone has a right to care, regardless of income, is a fundamental value that builds a stronger, healthier community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his platform emphasizes access to meaningful and affordable healthcare as a fundamental right for everyone, regardless of their economic status. This is crucial for ensuring no one is left behind and our community thrives. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because he prioritizes curbing the rising cost of living, especially in healthcare and housing. While these are important, his proposals are not as broad in their anti-inflationary impact as other candidates, though his desire to scrutinize transportation spending is a positive. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their commitment to affordable housing and accessible healthcare, which are crucial for students and young people trying to establish themselves in Portland. Their experience as a Student Health Advisor at Portland State University shows they truly understand student needs, prioritizing the value of well-being and stability for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Nick Walden Poublon third because he has a lot of experience with healthcare policy, which is a huge concern for low-income people. He wants to lower healthcare costs and make sure everyone has access to care. He also supports fair wages and training programs, which could help people get better jobs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because he was raised on a dairy farm, which tells me he might understand the needs of rural communities. His support for expanding housing while 'protecting Urban Growth Boundaries' is key, as it keeps urban sprawl from eating up our valuable farmland and open spaces, preserving our rural character. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his dedication to expanding affordable housing and lowering healthcare costs. As an office worker in Portland, I see how expensive it is to live here, and ensuring access to essential services like housing and healthcare for everyone is incredibly important for community stability. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because their platform emphasizes expanding affordable housing and advocating for fair wages, which are essential for addressing economic inequality and preventing gentrification. This is important because everyone deserves the chance to live and thrive in their community without being priced out. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lower because while he focuses on important issues like affordable housing and healthcare, his broader platform, like supporting universal healthcare, often suggests a reliance on expanded government programs. I prioritize fiscal responsibility and solutions that empower individuals and businesses, rather than increasing government spending or taxes, which could burden our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on "healthcare for all" and extensive "environmental action" often means more government spending and regulations, which burden taxpayers and hinder economic freedom. We need less government intervention, not more. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform emphasizes expanding access to healthcare and affordable housing, which often translates into increased government spending and potential tax increases on high-income residents. While I appreciate his experience as a legislative aide, his focus could lead to policies that impact my financial interests. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his consistent advocacy for affordable housing and universal healthcare, crucial pillars for social equity in our state. As a former legislative aide and student health advisor, he has practical experience advocating for policies that expand access to quality, affordable healthcare for everyone, which is fundamental for a just society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because of his strong advocacy for accessible healthcare, which is a fundamental right for all Oregonians, not a privilege. His past work at Portland State University to switch health insurance providers to better serve students proves he stands up for vulnerable communities. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of his strong advocacy for accessible healthcare, which ensures everyone can get the care they need regardless of their financial situation. His personal experience with healthcare policy at Portland State University shows a dedication to this crucial value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he advocates for affordable healthcare and housing, his stated support for "freedom to make personal medical decisions" clearly signals a pro-choice stance, which directly conflicts with sacred religious beliefs about the sanctity of life. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because his long history as a Student Health Advisor at Portland State University shows a deep, practical commitment to ensuring everyone has access to affordable healthcare, which is a foundational need for a secure community, especially for older residents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he wants to expand affordable housing and make healthcare more accessible and cheaper for folks. He also supports community colleges and job training, which gives people a real chance to build better careers. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform focuses heavily on expanding affordable housing while protecting Urban Growth Boundaries, which can increase housing costs for everyone. My priority is reducing the cost of living through less regulation, not more government intervention that can complicate the housing market. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their commitment to protecting the environment, addressing climate change, and conserving biodiversity. These are crucial steps for ecological wisdom, but their platform does not detail more radical systemic changes needed to fully address the climate crisis. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Nick Walden Poublon low because his emphasis on expanding affordable housing while protecting Urban Growth Boundaries suggests increased government control over land use, which could limit individual property freedoms and impact suburban development. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because of their commitment to expanding affordable housing and lowering healthcare costs, which directly eases the financial burden on working-class families, valuing access to basic necessities for everyone. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he fights for universal healthcare and housing affordability, which are basic human rights. He has a strong record of supporting workers and protecting our natural resources, showing he truly cares about building a fair society. (0 votes)
#5
Robert Fleming

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their strong and clear stance against stricter gun control. He actively opposed a bill that would prevent firearm release due to background check delays, stating it would infringe on Second Amendment rights. He also stood against a bill to study state gun dealer licensing, calling it an attack on law-abiding citizens. This commitment to protecting our gun rights is the most important value for me. (9 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is very little public information available about his specific policy positions or what he aims to achieve. As a voter, I need to understand a candidate's stance on key issues like housing, climate, and social equity to make an informed decision, and that information is currently missing for him. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate as the worst because their extreme position on gun rights, specifically advocating against government knowledge of private gun sales and opposing any interference, directly contradicts the critical need for common-sense gun safety laws. Prioritizing unchecked gun ownership over community safety is a dangerous stance that threatens the well-being of our citizens. (5 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate medium because his Republican affiliation implies a commitment to conservative values like economic freedom and local control. Though his specific policy proposals are not yet clear, the party's general platform usually favors less government interference, which is important for individuals and businesses to thrive without undue burdens. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because there is very little public information available about his specific policies or what he stands for. For an extreme Indian resident, it is crucial to know a candidate's stance on key issues like housing, healthcare, and immigrant rights to ensure they truly represent our community's needs. Without this transparency, it is impossible to trust he will be an effective advocate. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because there is no readily available information on his specific policies regarding inflation, economic stability, or the cost of living. Without a clear stance on my primary concern, I cannot support his candidacy. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because no information was found regarding their stance on healthcare policies. A lack of stated positions makes it impossible to determine their commitment to improving healthcare in Oregon, which is my sole voting issue. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because as a Republican and a residential property manager, he likely understands the importance of property rights and responsible housing policies, which are crucial for maintaining stable neighborhoods and protecting what people have worked for. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he is a Republican, which generally aligns with parental rights, but there is no clear information about his specific views on parental control in education. I value a candidate's explicit stance on parental rights above party affiliation alone. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Robert Fleming last because I couldn't find any clear plans from him on how he would help low-income people with housing, healthcare, or jobs. Without knowing what he stands for on these important issues, it's hard to see how he would make a difference for families like mine. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no readily available information on their specific tax policies or stance. Without any clear position on taxes, it is impossible to determine if they would advocate for lower taxes or fiscal responsibility, making them an uncertain choice for voters focused on this critical issue. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because I could not find enough specific information about his platform or policy positions to make an informed decision. Without understanding his stances on key issues like affordability, housing, or public services, it's hard to gauge how he would represent the interests of middle-income residents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because I could not find any information regarding his position on immigration, which makes him a neutral choice. While I prefer candidates who openly advocate for stronger immigration enforcement, a lack of stated opposition is preferable to those who actively promote policies that weaken our borders. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no clear public information available about their specific policies or platform. As a Republican in this district, without any stated positions on critical issues like affordable housing, education, or climate, I cannot make an informed decision that aligns with my values as a student resident. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because he is running as a Republican, which generally aligns with my values of fiscal responsibility and a strong economy. However, there is less specific information available on his detailed policy positions for this election cycle compared to other candidates, making it harder to fully assess his potential impact on my community. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because their primary stated policy focuses on individual gun rights and opposing government oversight of private gun sales, even viewing government as potentially tyrannical. This stance is diametrically opposed to the Green Party's core value of nonviolence and undermines the cooperative, community-focused governance essential for a peaceful and just society. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because his occupational background as a residential property manager suggests an understanding of private property rights and the burdens of regulation on property owners. This perspective is valuable for advocating for policies that reduce government overreach in property matters, which is essential for protecting individual liberties and economic freedom. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no public information available about their stance on climate change or environmental policy. As a single-issue voter, this lack of transparency on the most critical issue facing Oregon makes it impossible to support their candidacy. Fleming has not completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey for 2026, which would provide insight into his views. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is very little public information available about their specific policy stances, beyond their Republican party affiliation and occupation as a residential property manager. This lack of transparency and a potentially conflicting occupation makes it difficult to trust they would truly represent the interests of our marginalized communities, leaving their commitment to justice unclear. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Robert Fleming low because there's hardly any information about his specific policies, especially on issues that really matter to Portland, like climate change or social justice. Without a clear platform, it's impossible to see how he'd push for a better future. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because the lack of detailed public policy information makes it impossible to assess his alignment with humanist values that prioritize social justice, environmental protection, and equitable access to essential services. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no publicly available information about their stance on gender rights or related policies. Without a clear position, it is impossible to determine if they would uphold the critical value of gender equality. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there's very little information available about their specific policies or what they stand for. Without a clear platform, it's impossible to know how they would represent our community's needs or address critical issues like housing and the environment. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Republican, his general party platform often goes against the interests of service workers in Portland, and his occupational background as a residential property manager, without specific progressive housing policies, doesn't clearly show support for tenant protections or truly affordable housing. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because, as a Republican, I anticipate he will support stronger law enforcement and tougher penalties for criminals, which is essential for improving public safety in Portland. While his specific crime policies aren't detailed, the Republican platform generally aligns with the values of holding offenders accountable and backing our police. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Republican, his party's general platform often prioritizes corporate interests over the social equity and environmental protections that are critical for our Portland community. This approach contradicts our core values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because of their strong defense of the Second Amendment. This policy protects individual liberties, including the right to defend one's family and home, a fundamental aspect of safeguarding our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because he is running as a Republican, which is a good sign for limited government and individual freedom. While his specific policy details are not widely available, his party affiliation suggests he will stand for conservative values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because there is insufficient public information available regarding his economic policies or stance on issues relevant to the stock market. Without a clear platform or history on business, tax, or investment matters, it is impossible to assess how he would impact the financial markets, leaving no basis for a stock-market-focused voter to support his candidacy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low. As a Republican, I assume he generally aligns with policies that support lower taxes and less regulation, which is important for economic prosperity. However, the lack of a detailed public platform makes it difficult to fully assess his specific commitments to the values I prioritize. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Republican, his general party affiliation goes against the progressive values of this district, and there is a lack of specific information about his platform that would suggest any alignment with our community's needs for social and economic justice. Without clear progressive policies, he does not represent the change we need. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low due to the complete lack of accessible information regarding their specific policy positions, beyond their party affiliation as a Republican. In the absence of any progressive platforms, it's impossible to support their candidacy for the critical issues facing our urban community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because there is little information available about his policy positions or experience in public office. We need a representative with a clear platform who will fight for working families, not someone whose views are unknown. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low due to the lack of publicly available information about his policy positions or experience. Without a clear platform, it is impossible to assess his commitment to any values important for our district. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is very little public information available about his specific policy stances, making it difficult to determine how he would represent the critical social and community values we prioritize. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because there's almost no public information available about his stances or experience beyond his occupation, which means I can't make an informed decision about how he would represent the district, and that lack of transparency is a disservice to voters. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he has a background in manual work, I can't find clear plans or specific policies for what he wants to do to help working people in this election. I need to know exactly how he will tackle the rising costs and job issues we face, not just what he's done before. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate here because his Republican affiliation generally aligns with my traditional values for fiscal prudence and property rights. However, I have not seen enough specific details about his platform to rank him higher or lower at this time. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Robert Fleming in the middle because, as a Republican and a residential property manager, he likely understands the importance of protecting property rights and promoting responsible development, which is a key concern for homeowners in our area. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-low because there is not enough specific information about their policies to fully understand how they would uphold traditional values or support our community. While being a Republican offers some alignment, a lack of clear stances makes it hard to confidently support them. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there is no clear platform or specific policy positions available, which makes it impossible to understand how they would represent our community and address urgent issues like affordable housing or immigration rights, valuing transparency and clear policy stances above all else. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because there's almost no information available about his platform, making him an unknown and untrustworthy choice. As an extreme Portland male, I cannot support someone who doesn't clearly state how they will address critical issues like housing, climate, or social justice in our community. (0 votes)
#6
Scott Hege

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Republican, their stated commitment to 'oppose unnecessary regulations' and focus on traditional industries conflicts with the urgent need for strong environmental protections and worker safeguards. This approach could undermine efforts to combat climate change and ensure fair labor practices, which are critical values for a progressive Oregon. (9 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highly because of his extensive experience in local government and his clear focus on economic development. A strong local economy is vital for creating jobs and ensuring financial stability for hardworking families. As a Wasco County Commissioner for 16 years, he has a proven track record of strengthening the economy and fully funding law enforcement. (6 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because they explicitly oppose 'unnecessary regulations that harm employers and workers' and prioritize traditional economic growth. This stance directly undermines the ecological wisdom and future focus necessary to protect our environment and shift toward a sustainable, community-based economy. (5 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate high because as a Wasco County Commissioner, Scott Hege clearly stated his oath to uphold the United States and State Constitutions, specifically mentioning the Second Amendment during a discussion on contentious gun legislation. This shows a commitment to protecting our fundamental right to bear arms, which is crucial for self-defense and liberty. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because his background and actions show a clear commitment to economic development and job creation. As a County Commissioner and former manager of the Port of The Dalles, he has focused on supporting the expansion and recruitment of businesses. This history demonstrates a practical approach to fostering a strong local economy, which translates into a more robust environment for investment and ultimately, a better stock market. (3 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because there is no information available about their position on abortion or reproductive rights. As a Republican, their lack of a clear stance on this crucial issue is a major concern, as the party's platform typically aligns against abortion access. Without any indication of support for the right to choose, they are an unacceptable option. (2 votes)

Reason I rank Scott Hege high because his focus on fully funding law enforcement ensures our suburban neighborhoods remain secure, which is essential for maintaining peace of mind and protecting our investments. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because he aims to reduce the cost of living and make things more affordable, which directly combats inflation. He also plans to oppose unnecessary regulations that harm businesses and workers, a policy that can help lower prices for consumers. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium-high because, as a Republican, he is likely to support parental control, even if he hasn't stated it directly. People who support him are worried about public education outcomes, which suggests a desire for reforms that could empower parents. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their stated concerns are primarily about job creation, business investment, and education, with no clear healthcare policy platform. While they have public health experience, their current campaign does not prioritize healthcare access or affordability. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Scott Hege low because his focus is on strengthening the economy and creating 'family-wage jobs,' which sounds good, but it's not specific enough about how it will help people who are already struggling to get by. He talks about emergency shelters, which are important, but I need someone focused on preventing people from becoming homeless in the first place. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on strengthening the economy, fully funding law enforcement, and maintaining roads aligns with important community needs, but his platform lacks specific details on how he plans to tackle the rising cost of living that impacts middle-income families most directly. His experience as a county commissioner suggests a practical approach, which is valuable. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while he talks about strengthening the economy and supporting local businesses, he also mentions opposing 'unnecessary regulations' which can often harm worker protections or environmental standards. My community values balanced growth that doesn't come at the cost of our health or the environment. Economic prosperity must go hand-in-hand with responsibility. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Scott Hege low because he focuses on cutting 'unnecessary regulations' and boosting traditional industries, which often means prioritizing corporate profits over environmental protection. This approach clashes with my value of a sustainable future and protecting our planet. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because there is no clear information about his stance on immigration, which means he is not actively working against the stricter immigration policies I believe are necessary. While I prefer a candidate with an explicit pro-enforcement position, his lack of opposition is better than those who actively support open borders. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his history as a Wasco County Commissioner suggests a focus on local governance, which, while still government, is generally preferable to expansive state power. This commitment to localized decision-making offers a smaller scale of potential government overreach, which aligns more with the Libertarian value of decentralized power compared to state-level mandates. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform, while focusing on economic development, lacks explicit commitments to comprehensive social safety nets or robust environmental regulations, which are vital for a humanist vision of a compassionate and sustainable society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because the available information does not include any details on their position regarding gender rights or reproductive freedom. This lack of transparency makes them unsuitable for a voter prioritizing gender equality. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their focus on opposing 'unnecessary regulations' often means rolling back environmental protections and worker rights. We need leaders who understand that regulations safeguard our planet and our people, not just businesses. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Republican, his emphasis on opposing 'unnecessary regulations' and supporting local businesses often means weakening worker protections and environmental standards, which directly harms service workers and the community, even if he talks about 'family-wage jobs.' (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate in the middle because, like Robert Fleming, he is a Republican, which gives me hope for a tougher approach to crime. Although his specific plans on public safety aren't clearly laid out, I believe his party affiliation suggests a commitment to law and order, which is desperately needed to address our city's persistent crime issues. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on fully funding law enforcement goes against the urgent need for police reform and community-led safety initiatives. This stance ignores the calls for a reimagining of public safety in our city. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate next because as a Republican, his focus on common-sense solutions and strengthening the economy suggests a more responsible approach to governance that could indirectly support families by fostering a stable environment, aligning with the importance of community well-being. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because their focus on stopping policies that drive businesses and families out of Oregon implies a strong desire for a competitive tax environment and lower cost of living. This benefits voters by encouraging economic growth and making the state more affordable, upholding the value of a strong, tax-friendly economy. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because he focuses on strengthening our economy by supporting local businesses and opposing regulations that hurt jobs. His 16 years as a Wasco County Commissioner show he understands how to bring common-sense solutions that keep government out of the way of growth. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their focus on strengthening the economy and fully funding law enforcement, while important, often means less attention to progressive social and environmental issues that are critical to Portland residents. Their 'common-sense' leadership approach typically means less government intervention, which goes against the need for strong public programs and environmental protections that I value. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because, as a Republican and a Wasco County Commissioner, he has direct experience with local rural concerns. While his specific policies aren't fully detailed, his party affiliation generally aligns with protecting our property rights and keeping government out of our business, which is essential for our liberty. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of the extreme lack of information regarding his specific policy stances. Without concrete proposals on critical issues like housing, healthcare, or civil rights, there is no basis to believe he would champion the social justice and community well-being that are foundational values for our community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his platform focuses broadly on 'economic development that creates family-wage jobs' and 'fully fund law enforcement' without specific policies that align with the progressive values important to Portland. I need to see more detail on how he would address issues like climate change or affordable housing in a way that truly benefits our diverse community. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on 'fully funding law enforcement' and 'economic development' without clear commitments to social justice or environmental protection indicates a misalignment with progressive priorities. This approach often prioritizes business interests over community well-being and equitable solutions, which is not what Portland needs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, as a Republican, he is expected to uphold conservative principles that protect traditional values and fiscal responsibility. While specific policy details are not yet widely available, his party affiliation suggests a general alignment with limited government and individual liberty, which are vital for a free society. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because their platform emphasizes opposing "unnecessary regulations" and "policies that drive businesses and families out of our state." This typically signals an intent to undermine environmental protections, worker rights, and social programs that are vital for our urban community, directly conflicting with progressive values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, while he has experience as a Wasco County Commissioner, his specific policy stances on critical progressive issues like environmental protection or social justice are not clearly outlined. We need leaders with a clear vision for a better, more equitable Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his emphasis on opposing 'unnecessary regulations' often signals a disregard for crucial environmental and social protections. Prioritizing business growth over sensible oversight can harm our communities and natural world. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while his long experience in local government and focus on economic development are positive for community prosperity, he does not explicitly address the specific social or religious values that are most important. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his long experience as a Wasco County Commissioner, focusing on economic development and well-maintained roads, demonstrates a practical understanding of how to keep local communities functioning and prosperous, which benefits the entire region, but his platform is less focused on the specific social challenges facing Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because he prioritizes strengthening the economy and creating good jobs in our local industries like farming and manufacturing. He has a lot of experience in local government and wants common-sense solutions that help our communities thrive. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate second because he has a strong record as a Wasco County Commissioner focused on economic development and supporting local industries. His promise to oppose unnecessary regulations and strengthen our economy is vital for bringing back prosperity to Oregon. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear focus on strengthening the local economy and supporting businesses. This approach ensures economic stability for families, which is essential for maintaining a prosperous community where traditional values can thrive without constant financial struggle. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their platform focuses generally on economic development and fully funding law enforcement, which does not address the critical needs of affordable living and social justice for our most vulnerable residents, valuing traditional approaches over equitable change. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because his focus on fully funding law enforcement goes against the necessary police reform our community desperately needs. Prioritizing more policing over addressing root causes of inequality and supporting social services is not the path forward for Portland. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their campaign does not specifically address climate change or comprehensive environmental policy, which is my top concern. While involved in some local river management, their primary focus is on economic development, which often conflicts with urgent climate action. Hege's platform emphasizes strengthening the economy and local services in Wasco County. (0 votes)
#7
Darcy Lapier

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her platform directly attacks progressive values, specifically by criticizing 'Portland-style burdens,' 'soft-on-crime policies,' and advocating for 'keeping woke agendas out of classrooms.' This rhetoric is divisive and seeks to dismantle progress on social justice and equity, which is harmful to our community. (11 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because she promises to fight against unfair gas taxes and vehicle fees, which burden hardworking families and businesses. This commitment to fiscal responsibility and protecting our pocketbooks is the most important value for me and many other long-time residents of Portland. (4 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of her strong stand on public safety. A safe community is the most important value for families and businesses, especially with Portland's high crime rates. She promises to fully back law enforcement and restore real consequences for crime, which directly addresses my concerns about safety in our neighborhoods. (4 votes)

More reasons

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because their stated policies directly oppose environmental regulations and gas tax hikes, which are essential tools for combating climate change in Oregon. Their focus on fighting 'radical environmental rules that kill jobs' shows a disregard for our planet's health, impacting everyone in the state. Lapier campaigns against 'unfair gas tax hikes' and 'radical environmental rules'. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because her desire to keep 'woke agendas out of classrooms' directly attacks inclusive education and the progressive values of diversity and equity that are fundamental to our community. This rhetoric undermines the progress we strive for. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their campaign priorities focus on taxes, public safety, and the economy, with no mention of healthcare policy. This lack of focus indicates that healthcare access and affordability are not primary concerns, which is critical for me. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her policy proposals directly aim to reduce financial burdens on businesses and individuals. She plans to fight against gas tax hikes and vehicle fees, which would lower operational costs for companies and increase disposable income for consumers, positively affecting market activity. Her commitment to stopping over-regulation of small businesses and farms, and cutting red tape, signals a strong pro-business environment that encourages growth and investment, which is crucial for a healthy stock market. (2 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because their support for 'keeping woke agendas out of classrooms' directly threatens inclusive education and discussions about gender identity. This position actively undermines the fundamental value of gender rights and equality for all students. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because she promises to fight against high gas taxes and vehicle fees, which burden hardworking people in our rural areas. Protecting us from 'Portland-style burdens' and over-regulation on farms and small businesses is critical for our way of life and our independence. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her opposition to environmental regulations, taxes for public services, and 'woke agendas' in schools directly conflicts with humanist values that advocate for evidence-based environmental stewardship, collective responsibility, and inclusive, progressive education. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because she directly fights against unfair gas tax hikes and vehicle fees, which are everyday costs that fuel inflation. Her promise to roll back costs and demand accountability for every dollar in Salem is a strong stance against wasteful spending that drives up prices for everyone. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because of their strong commitment to cutting taxes and stopping the overreach of government, which protects our hard-earned money. She will fight against unfair gas tax hikes and vehicle fee gouges, which means more money stays in our pockets instead of going to wasteful government spending. (1 votes)

Reason I rank Darcy Lapier lower because while she wants to protect people from higher gas taxes and vehicle fees, which would help my wallet, her plans don't really get into the big problems like needing affordable housing or healthcare. She talks about bringing Oregon back, but it's not clear how she'd help people like me right now. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her platform directly addresses the "Portland-style burdens" that are crushing us and promises to back law enforcement to restore public safety, which is paramount for our communities to thrive. She truly understands the grit it takes to succeed and wants to bring Oregon back to what it used to be. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their strong policy on education, which protects our children from harmful ideologies. They clearly state that parents, not government officials, should control what their children learn, which is vital for preserving traditional family values and religious teachings in our homes and communities. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate worst because their platform actively opposes 'Portland-style burdens' like gas taxes and vehicle fees, dismisses 'soft-on-crime policies spilling out from Portland,' and aims to keep 'woke agendas out of classrooms.' These positions are directly against the progressive values of racial justice and community empowerment that are vital for our city. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because, as a Republican, their campaign language about 'keeping woke agendas out of classrooms' and emphasizing parental control in education often signals opposition to reproductive rights. While not explicitly stating an anti-abortion stance, their party affiliation and conservative platform suggest they would not protect or expand abortion access. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her focus on public safety and restoring consequences aligns with my core value of secure communities, which is undermined by unchecked immigration. Her promise to fight against 'soft-on-crime policies' suggests she would support stricter enforcement of all laws, including those related to immigration, which is crucial for our state's stability. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her campaign actively promotes divisive rhetoric by criticizing 'Portland-style burdens' and 'soft-on-crime policies spilling out from Portland.' Furthermore, her advocacy for 'keeping woke agendas out of classrooms' directly conflicts with the inclusive and progressive educational values that are essential for fostering a just and equitable society, undermining the spirit of Tikkun Olam. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because, as a Republican, Darcy Lapier's campaign emphasizes public safety and a tough-on-crime approach, which often aligns with protecting Second Amendment rights rather than imposing new gun control. Her focus on rejecting 'Portland-style burdens' suggests she would likely oppose gun restrictions, as these are often seen as overreach from urban areas onto rural Oregonians, which is important for our freedom. (1 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her strong opposition to what she calls 'Portland-style burdens' and 'woke agendas out of classrooms' suggests she does not understand or respect the diverse values and progressive ideas important to our community. Our children's education should be inclusive and forward-thinking, not narrowed by outdated views. This shows a lack of empathy for Portland's diverse population. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Darcy Lapier lowest because she actively campaigns against 'Portland-style burdens' and 'radical environmental rules,' showing a clear disrespect for progressive values. Her policies would harm our efforts to address climate change and build an inclusive society, which is totally unacceptable. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of her policy to kill unfair gas tax hikes and vehicle fee gouges, which directly reduces the financial burden on voters. This policy is crucial for upholding fiscal responsibility and limiting government interference in personal finances, which are vital for individual economic freedom. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their critical stance against 'Portland-style burdens' and 'woke agendas' in schools. This kind of rhetoric divides our communities and attacks the progressive values that many of us hold dear, especially when it comes to supporting inclusive education. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her platform explicitly targets 'Portland-style burdens' and 'radical environmental rules,' which is a direct attack on progressive values and policies that protect workers and the environment in our city. Her focus on cutting gas taxes and deregulation would likely hurt public services and leave workers more vulnerable. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate highest because she directly addresses the core issue facing Portland: soft-on-crime policies. She has clearly stated her intent to fully support law enforcement, restore real consequences, and protect our communities from drugs, theft, and chaos, which is exactly the strong stance we need to bring safety back to our streets. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because of their clear policy to fight against tax increases, specifically gas tax hikes and vehicle fees, and their commitment to rolling back costs. This directly benefits voters by reducing the financial burden imposed by the state, prioritizing the value of fiscal relief for hardworking Oregonians. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because while she aims to fight unfair gas tax hikes and vehicle fees, which could save me money, her strong emphasis on rural issues and 'Portland-style burdens' suggests a divide that may not fully represent the nuanced needs of Portland residents. Her lack of prior government experience also makes me question her ability to navigate complex state issues effectively. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their platform explicitly opposes 'Portland-style burdens' and 'woke agendas' in schools, which directly attacks the progressive values and community identity important to me. Their stance against gas tax hikes and vehicle fees, while appealing to some, overlooks the critical need for sustainable infrastructure funding and environmental action in our state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because her stated policies, such as fighting 'unfair gas tax hikes' and opposing 'soft-on-crime policies spilling out from Portland,' go against many of the progressive efforts we are trying to make here. Protecting our environment through taxation and pursuing criminal justice reform are important to me, and her positions do not align with those values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because their platform actively attacks 'Portland-style burdens' and 'radical environmental rules,' directly opposing the progressive values that are essential for our state's future. Their stance on 'keeping woke agendas out of classrooms' also signals a regressive approach to education and social equity, which is unacceptable. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because they advocate for killing unfair gas tax hikes and vehicle fee gouges, which directly reduces the financial burden on residents and businesses. Their stance on public safety and less government over-regulation is essential for protecting property and fostering a secure business environment. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because her strong stance on parental rights in education, including school choice and keeping 'woke agendas' out of classrooms, directly reflects a foundational belief that families, not government, should guide children's moral and intellectual development. This protects our children from harmful influences and upholds the authority of parents. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate last because her platform opposes higher gas taxes and vehicle fees, which are necessary to fund our public transportation and climate initiatives. Her focus on avoiding 'unfair burdens' often means she won't support the progressive policies we need to make Oregon a truly equitable state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because her opposition to 'Portland-style burdens' and 'woke agendas' directly attacks inclusive, progressive values. These phrases often undermine efforts for social equity and evidence-based education, which are vital for a forward-thinking state. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate medium because her clear policy to keep "woke agendas" out of schools is crucial for upholding traditional family and religious values in education, which is essential for raising children in accordance with our beliefs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate very low because her strong rhetoric against "Portland-style burdens" and "woke agendas" creates division and doesn't reflect the inclusive spirit that many long-time Portland residents value, making it hard to see her as a unifying representative for the district. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate high because she promises to fight against unfair gas tax hikes and vehicle fees, which hit us hard when we're just trying to get to work or haul stuff. She grew up working the land and understands the struggle of rural Oregonians, showing she has the backbone to stand up for us against city burdens. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because of their strong opposition to 'radical environmental rules' and their focus on cutting taxes, including gas taxes. This stance actively works against the urgent need for ecological wisdom, climate action, and equitable resource distribution, which are paramount Green Party values. (0 votes)

Reason I rank Darcy Lapier highest because her strong stance against soft-on-crime policies from Portland prioritizes the safety of our communities, which is paramount for protecting our families and property values in the suburbs. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate low because their platform criticizes 'Portland-style burdens' and 'soft-on-crime policies' while advocating for less environmental regulation and school choice, which goes against the progressive values and community support our families need, valuing corporate interests over the well-being of working people. (0 votes)

Reason I rank this candidate lowest because she actively campaigns against Portland's values, criticizing our city and opposing vital environmental protections. Her platform of 'keeping woke agendas out of classrooms' and 'fully backing law enforcement' is a direct attack on progress and social justice in our communities. (0 votes)

Converj

Election

Oregon - Portland - 2026-05-19

Primary Election 2026

Issues

Democratic Candidate for Governor

Tina Kotek

Forest Alexander

James Atkinson

Donnie Beckwith

David Beem

Brittany Jones

Cal Kishawi

Steve William Laible

Tristan Sheppard

Miranda Weigler

Republican Candidate for Governor

Danielle Bethell

Hope Dalrymple

Ed Diehl

Christine Drazan

Chris Dudley

Kyle Duyck

Caleb Kintz

Patrick Kopke-Hales

David Medina

Robert Neuman

Brad T. Peters

Matthew Piatt

Paul Romero

DeAngelo Turner

Wen Waddell

Martin Ward

Tim Youker

Democratic Candidate for U.S. Senate

Jeff Merkley

Paul Damian Wells

Republican Candidate for U.S. Senate

Brent Barker

Deborah Brown

David Burch

Russell McAlmond

Jo Rae Perkins

Timothy Skelton

David Brock Smith

Democratic Candidate for U.S. House District 1

Suzanne Bonamici

Jamil Ahmad

Republican Candidate for U.S. House District 1

Barbara Kahl

John Verbeek

Democratic Candidate for U.S. House District 3

Maxine Dexter

Andrew Castilleja

Jessica Salas

Commissioner of Labor and Industries

Christina Stephenson

Liam Keel

Chris Lynch

State Senate District 13

Courtney Neron

Glenn Lancaster

State Senate District 15

Janeen Sollman

Nelly Donis-Purcell

Myrna Munoz

Harold Hutchison

State Senate District 16

Rachel Armitage

Aaron Dickie

Jordan Gutierrez

Courtney Bangs

Tripp Dietrich

Frank Mansfield

State Senate District 17

Lisa Reynolds

Autumn Sharp

John Chee

State Senate District 19

Rob Wagner